╌>

Lawyer for Berkeley Republicans in Coulter Case Slams ACLU for Absence

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  xxjefferson51  •  7 years ago  •  9 comments

Lawyer for Berkeley Republicans in Coulter Case Slams ACLU for Absence
Attorney Harmeet Dhillon, who is representing the Berkeley College Republicans in their free speech case against the University of California, Berkeley over failing to allow Ann Coulter to speak on campus on equal terms, slammed the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for ignoring the case.”
“I don’t see the ACLU here in this room, which is unfortunate,” Dillon said, after listing several prominent Democrats who join her in opposing Berkeley’s efforts to restrict Coulter’s speech.



Asked whether there was “something special” about suing UC Berkeley, the home of the Free Speech Movement, Dillon answered:

“I never thought I’d be on the same side of an issue as Willie Brown, Bernie Sanders, Bill Maher, Keith Ellison, and every other person who’s a lawyer. Now, there are some amateur lawyers, like Howard Dean, who looks up a case on the Internet and then thinks he’s a Supreme Court scholar — and, you know, some of our members of Congress who play lawyers on TV, apparently. But no, I think I don’t know any lawyers, serious lawyers practicing constitutional law, who think that this is appropriate.



“And I have had dozens and dozens of emails and calls from lawyers who don’t know me, around the country. They all start with, ‘I don’t support what Ann Coulter says, but,” you know, or, ‘I hate what Donald Trump stands for, but you’re absolutely right on this, and this cannot stand.’

“And nor should it stand if it were happening on a conservative college campus and it were liberal students whose views were being marginalized.”

She noted that her passion for free speech issues was born when she was a student at Dartmouth, when some students were expelled for criticizing a music professor in print.



“Who represented us in the hinterlands of New Hampshire? The American Civil Liberties Union came in to represent my colleagues on the Dartmouth Review.”

She remarked, in that context, that the ACLU’s absence at Berkeley was noteworthy.

As Breitbart News noted last month, Dhillon once served on the board of the San Francisco Bay Area chapter of the ACLU.



She is a noted Trump supporter, and serves as the vice chair of the California Republican Party. She is reportedly under consideration to be named to lead the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Dhillon is also representing Trump supporters who were attacked by anti-Trump rioters outside a Trump rally in their lawsuit against the city of San Jose for failing to protect them from the mob.

Critics say the ACLU has been drifting in a left direction for many years, often abandoning its absolute adherence to basic civil liberties in favor of a state-centered, redistributionist, and identity inflected concept of rights. http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/04/24/coulter-lawyer-berkeley-college-republicans-slams-aclu-ignoring-free-speech/

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51    7 years ago

The ACLU should be leading the charge to assure Coulter her full free speech rights at Berkeley.  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
link   Buzz of the Orient    7 years ago

The ACLU used to be an admirable unbiased apolitical organization. What happened?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Buzz of the Orient   7 years ago

They like the SPLC have become a partisan collective hate group more than an advocate for any individuals rights as an individual.  

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
link   1ofmany  replied to  Buzz of the Orient   7 years ago

The ACLU protects politically correct speech. Everything else is hate speech because they hate to hear it.

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
link   Cerenkov  replied to  Buzz of the Orient   7 years ago

They lost their way due to ideology. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Cerenkov   7 years ago

Exactly.  They traded 1st amendment advocacy for secular progressive advocacy.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
link   pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51   7 years ago

They traded 1st amendment advocacy for secular progressive advocacy.  

Is that to say "1st amendment advocacy" is religious (not secular) ?

 
 
 
Steve Ott
Professor Quiet
link   Steve Ott    7 years ago

You don't suppose the ACLU is afraid of the anti-fa? Heaven forbid they should stand up to a bunch of jack-booted brown shirts masquerading as liberals.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
link   seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Steve Ott   7 years ago

The anti-fa is a product of the political left.  

 
 

Who is online


devangelical
Greg Jones
Kavika
CB
Sparty On
Ed-NavDoc


55 visitors