<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[@A. Macarthur - blog]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[
• Retired Labor Representative, Contract Language Writer, Negotiator, Contract Enforcement Agent
• Retired Newspaper Editor-in-Chief, Published Author, Editorial/Writer-columnist
• Currently ... Photographer, Digital Artist
• Degrees in Biology, Fine Art, Post-Graduate Studies
]]></description>
        <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 15:15:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="http://thenewstalkers.com/feed/blog/a-macarthur" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[New Fantasy Digital Painting - @a-macarthur]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/39/new-fantasy-digital-painting</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/39</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[    Moon photographed in Wyoming ... landscape photographed in the Grand Canyon ... compositing done in Photoshop (Layers). ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:52:18 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Got Milk - @a-macarthur]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/38/got-milk</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/38</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[  Keeping abreast of the goings-on in my back yard.         ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:06:25 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[If "Obamacare" (The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act/PPACA) is Repealed, Here's My Advice to Democrats - @a-macarthur]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/14/if-obamacare-the-patient-protection-affordable-care-act-ppaca-is-repealed-heres-my-advice-to-democrats</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/14</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[  If the PPACA is repealed, the President and Democrats in Congress should immediately re-introduce  H.R. 676 FAQ ... U.S. Representative Jon Conyer's Universal Health Care Legislation.   <br>      And before going any further, here is that piece of legislation, one that unfortunately was not put on the table by President Obama.    <br>       What is H.R. 676/Universal Health Care?    H.R. 676, also called the United States National Health Insurance Act, is a bill to create a single-payer, publicly-financed, privately-delivered universal health care program that would cover all Americans without charging co-pays or deductibles. It guarantees access to the highest quality and most affordable health care services regardless of employment, ability to pay or pre-existing health conditions.    What is "single-payer"?   The term single-payer describes the kind of financing system that H.R. 676 uses. It means that one entity--in this case, established by the government--handles all billing and payment for health care services. Right now, there are thousands upon thousands of "payers"-- HMOs, PPOs, bill collection agencies, etc. The sheer volume of paperwork required by our current system means that  administrative waste accounts for roughly 31% of the money spent on health care . The single-payer system would eliminate the wasteful paperwork and administrative costs, redirecting more of our health care dollars to providing care.   Medicare is perhaps the best known single-payer system. Essentially, H.R. 676 would improve Medicare and expand it, so that it covers all Americans, regardless of their income.   <br>  Who will be eligible for health care coverage under H.R. 676?     All Americans  will be eligible for health care coverage. Every person who enrolls in the program and receive a United States National Health Insurance Card and individual ID number, and that is all anyone will need to receive care.    What health care services are covered?    The program established by H.R. 676 will cover all medically-necessary services without charging co-pays or deductibles. The services covered will include: primary care; inpatient, outpatient and emergency hospital care; prescription drugs; durable medical equipment; hearing, dental and vision care; chiropratic treatment; mental health services; and long-term care.    What about "catastrophic" care? Will I ever reach a limit for coverage?    No. There are no limits on coverage. Just as you will never pay a co-pay or a deductible under the universal national health care program, you will never reach a ceiling on your coverage.    Will I be able to choose my doctor?    Yes. Patients will have their choice of physicians, providers, hospitals and clinics. The financing will be public, but the providers will all remain private.    No co-pays or deductibles-- what's the catch? Will I actually pay less for health care?    There is no catch. Both families and employers will pay significantly less for health care.   Currently, the average family of four covered by an employer-provided health care plan spends roughly $4,225 on health care each year, including premiums, services, prescription drugs and supplies. This figure does not include the annual Medicare payroll tax, currently at 1.45%. Under the plan created by H.R. 676, a family of four making the median income of $56,200 would pay about $2,700 in payroll tax for all health care costs. No deductibles, no co-pays, no worrying about catastrophic coverage.  Employers who provide health insurance currently pay, on average, 74% of employee health premiums. For a family of four, the average employer share is $8,510 per year. Under H.R. 676, the employer pays a 4.75% payroll tax, not a premium to health insurance companies. For an employee making the median family income of $56,200 annually, the employer would pay roughly $2,700.   Estimates taken from: Employer Health Benefits 2006 Annual Survey, Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust; Consumer Expenditure Survey, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; and Study by the Center for Economic Research and Policy.    How will the transition to the new system work?   The full conversion to a non-profit, single-payer universal health care program will not take place overnight once the bill is passed. The total transition time will be roughly a 15-year period. Important elements of the transition will include:    Private health insurance companies will be prohibited from selling coverage that duplicates any benefits included in the universal national health care program. The private companies will, however, still be able to sell coverage for services that are not deemed medically necessary, such as many cosmetic surgery procedures.  Private insurance company workers who are displaced as a result of the transition will be the first to be hired and retained by the new single-payer entity. Any of the displaced workers who are not rehired will receive two years of unemployment benefits.    How will the universal program be paid for?   First, switching to a single-payer system will lead to billions of dollars saved in reduced administrative costs. Those savings will be passed on through the system and allow coverage for all Americans. Additional savings in the overall cost of health care will come from annual reimbursement rate negotiations with physicians and negotiated prices for prescription drugs, medical supplies and equipment.  Second, a "Medicare For All Trust Fund" will be created to ensure a dedicated source of funding in addition to annual appropriations. Sources of funding will include:   Maintain current federal and state funding for existing health care programs<br>   Closing corporate tax loopholes<br>   Repealing the Bush tax cuts for the highest income earners<br>   Establish employer/employee payroll tax of 4.75% (includes present 1.45% Medicare tax)<br>   Establish a 5% health tax on the top 5% of income earners; a 10% tax on top 1% of wage earners<br>   One quarter of one percent stock transaction tax  ________________________________________________________________________________  Should the PPACA be overturned, Republicans should be challenged by Obama and Democrats to vote for the above or, a similarly constructed bill ... and hold their feet to the fire ... broadly publicizing the tenets and benefits of the idea of Universal Health Care (Single Payer) as well as a Public Option that would compel heath insurance companies to establish competitive premiums.  Since the only health care "plan" advanced by Republicans involves the end of medicare and ... as one author puts it ...   Paul Ryan's Budget Plan: More Big Tax Cuts for the Rich          Howard Gleckman                 Paul Ryan, Member of the U.S. House of Representatives (Photo credit: Wikipedia)  No surprise here, but the tax cuts in Paul Ryans 2013 budget plan would result in huge benefits for high-income people and very modestor no benefits for low income working households, according to a new  analysis  by the Tax  Policy  Center.  TPC looked only at the tax reductions in Ryans plan, which also included offsettingbut unidentifiedcuts in tax credits, exclusions, and deductions. TPC found that in 2015, relative to todays tax system, those making $1 million or more would enjoy an average tax cut of $265,000 and see their after-tax income increase by 12.5 percent. By contrast, half of those making between $20,000 and $30,000 would get no tax cut at all. On average, people in that income group would get a tax reduction of $129. Ryan would raise their after-tax income by 0.5 percent.   http://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2012/03/23/paul-ryans-budget-plan-more-big-tax-cuts-for-the-rich/    ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:08:57 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA["Repeal Obamacare?" Hey ... Whaddya got to Lose? Oh ... I'm Glad You Asked. - @a-macarthur]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/13/repeal-obamacare-hey-whaddya-got-to-lose-oh-im-glad-you-asked</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/a-macarthur/blog/13</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[   Not that it matters, but for all its right-wing detractors who likely have no clue about what it offers or, IT'S ACTUAL NAME which is NOT "Obamacare," for those interested in knowing something about that which they oppose (don't ya' just hate those little f'n details?) ... it's ACTUAL NAME Is THE PATIENT PROTECTION AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE ACT (PPACA).  How many didn't know that? Raise your hands ... come on ... let's see the hands.  And for those who oppose it, but, who (prior to, and possibly even  after  this article) can not cite one actual provision of the Act, allow me to impart some information that Mitt, Newt, Rick, Rush et al ... could not fit on your bumper-sticker of a miseducation.  PPACA includes numerous provisions that began to take effect in 2010 and will continue/expand over several years.  * Require insurers to offer the same premium to all applicants of the same age and geographical location without regard to most pre-existing conditions (excluding tobacco use).  {That means insurers can't discriminate!)   * A shared responsibility requirement, commonly called an individual mandate, requires that all persons not covered by an employer sponsored health plan, Medicaid, Medicare or other public insurance programs, purchase and comply with an approved private insurance policy or pay a penalty, unless the applicable individual is a member of a recognized religious sect exempted by the Internal Revenue Service, or waived in cases of financial hardship.  {That means no one can game the system -- go to an emergency room uninsured and have those of us who purchase insurance pay an additional $1100/year on our premiums)   * Medicaid eligibility is expanded to include all individuals and families with incomes up to 133% of the poverty level along with a simplified CHIP enrollment process.  {That means A CHILD of poor parents doesn't necessarily have to die of cancer!}   * Health insurance exchanges will commence operation in each state, offering a marketplace where individuals and small businesses can compare policies and premiums, and buy insurance (with a government subsidy if eligible).  {That means if you move or change jobs you can still have health insurance}   * Low income persons and families above the Medicaid level and up to 400% of the federal poverty level will receive federal subsidies on a sliding scale if they choose to purchase insurance via an exchange (persons at 150% of the poverty level would be subsidized such that their premium cost would be of 2% of income or $50 a month for a family of 4).  {That's like the old favorite ... Christian Charity ... hmmmmm ... then why does the religious right hate this?}   * Minimum standards for health insurance policies are to be established and annual and lifetime coverage caps will be banned.  {That means if you run out of money you don't have to die because of it}     And contrary to the Right-Wing Hype   Health care law repeal: Why would it increase the deficit?   http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/The-Vote/2011/0107/Health-care-law-repeal-Why-would-it-increase-the-deficit    So ... as the U.S. Supreme Court is about to hear arguments brought against the PPACA by the plaintiffs - 26 states, two individuals, and the National Federation of Independent Business ... in case you might ask, "AND WHO MIGHT THEY BE?" -- I'm here to help.   On its website, the National Federation of Independent Business states that it is a "nonprofit, nonpartisan organization founded in 1943" and "represents the consensus views of its members in Washington and all 50 state capitals."  Its PAC is called Save America's Free Enterprise Trust (SAFE). The organization's donations tend to strongly favor Republicans.   I n 2010, 25 of its members, all Republican, were elected to the 112th Congress. A number of them, such as Rand Paul, Jeff Duncan, Paul Gosar and Kristi Noem, are affiliated with or endorsed by the Tea Party movement.    One other point.  The wife of one of the Supreme Court Justices, that would be Mrs. Clarence Thomas ... has been a Tea Party Activist lobbying against ... Obamacare!  Justice Thomas is not likely to recuse himself!        ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:41:50 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>