<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[@Perrie Halpern - blog]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[Everyone thinks of changing the world, but few think of changing themselves. 
Tolstoy was right. We all look outwards and never inwards. One of the biggest problems with the human race. 
Now enough with the heady stuff!
I am the founder of The NewsTalkers and its Resident Advisor. I have a BA in Accounting and Economics and a Masters in Education/Biology/Earth Science. Politically, I am a vocal independent. I am married and mom to identical twin girls and my fur son Wally.]]></description>
        <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 15:15:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="http://thenewstalkers.com/feed/blog/perrie-halpern" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[About the blogs - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/2788/about-the-blogs</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/2788</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[The blogs on this site are meant for true independent and original thoughts on many topics. What they are not for is a way to taunt other members, political rants, or short blurbs with no journalistic quality. Please keep that in mind.<br>
Thank you.]]></description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2024 14:28:57 -0500</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Heroes - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/1746/heroes</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/1746</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<br><br>
 Most people think of heroes as people who do amazing selfless acts to aid those or act on behalf of those they do not know. And while this is true, most heroes are just everyday people facing everyday trials and tribulations. <br>
 Tonight I lost a friend. She was one of the bravest people I have ever known and she was a hero to those of us who face chronic illness. Seven years ago, my friend Sue, was diagnosed with stage 4 ovarian cancer. Against all odds, she fought it and she did it with a smile and with a joke to spare to lighten any tough moment. She was actually pronounced cancer free after 4 years, but her joy was short lived. About a month later the cancer had returned and she underwent the same grueling treatment that she did the first time around. She never complained. She never wanted to talk about it. She was too busy living life and enjoying her sons and her hubby. <br>
 I went to see her about 2 weeks ago. She was was weak but her mind was sharp. She joked with me and asked me if she looked good enough to go dancing. I laughed as I tried not to cry. I told her I loved her and she told me she knew and she loved me, too. We had some time together and I am grateful for that, since that would be the last time I saw or spoke to her. She would not see anyone after that visit. <br>
 Sue will forever be my hero. She taught me how to face adversity with grace and bravery. She was a wonderful woman who never deserved this kind of ending... but then again, no good person does. I will never forget her but I chose to remember her as the tiny girl who could take on the world and make it look easy.  <br>
  <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 23:54:47 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Souvenirs. Moments that Make the Person - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/1418/souvenirs-moments-that-make-the-person</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/1418</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<br><br>
  <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
    Souvenir   <br>
  A picture postcard <br>   A folded stub <br>   A program of the play <br>   File away your photographs <br>   Of your holiday <br>
  And your mementos <br>   Will turn to dust <br>   But that's the price you pay <br>   For every year's a souvenir <br>   That slowly fades away <br>   Every year's a souvenir <br>   That slowly fades away <br>
  Words and lyrics, B. Joel <br>
  Souvenir. From the French word meaning to remember. We collect souvenirs throughout our lives. Occasionally we take them out from their dusty boxes, the scrap books we carefully constructed, or the photo albums we put them in, and look at them and remember. But the real souvenirs are the ones that are not physical, not the ones that we can actually see, but the ones that made us who we are. They are the defining moment or moments of our lives. Yet, those we rarely look at. <br>
  I have come to the conclusion that the reason for this is that for most of us, these defining moments are not pleasant. They are times that brought us some pain. Humans are odd creatures in that, the events that make us who we are, were rarely welcomed events. With the exception of having a child or a grandchild, most of these moments that defined us as people were also the ones that brought us a level of discomfort or grief. They were thrust upon us, and the choices we made at those moments, changed us forever in some way. The human condition is such that we tend not to change by our own volition, but by circumstances beyond our control. <br>
  Tolstoy said that, "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself." He also said,"Without knowing what I am and why I am here, life is impossible." For me, these are absolute truths. Yet very few of us, take a moment to look at the events of our lives and see, why we are who we are. Introspection is a skill that many of us lack. Why is that? Does it hurt too much to look back and see how the choices we made were either right or wrong? Do we not really like the person that we are? Is it too hard to question the values and principals today, which were based on these pivotal moments? Or is it just that these moments in themselves are just like opening up an old scar? If every year is a souvenir that slowly fades away....will we open the box that contain the souvenirs of the events in our lives and look in? Can you do that, and see how they made you who you are? And if we don't like who we are, can we change ourselves. Something to ponder. <br>
]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:59:04 -0500</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[What Is The Nature Of Internet Friendships? - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/832/what-is-the-nature-of-internet-friendships</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/832</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<br><br>
What is the nature of internet friendships?  Recent events in my life have me pondering this question. I have come to the conclusion that there are differing perceptions of what a internet friendship is.  Looking back on my experience I have had to ask myself some serious questions that I am sure many of us here have encountered. I think it comes down to several questions. <br>
What does it mean to you when you befriend someone on the internet?  Is it as real as any other friendship and therefore should we have the same expectations from it, or is it something less? Do we ever really know the person, or are they like a character in a play?<br>
Are there different degrees of friendship as we have in real life, or should we regard anyone we take on as a internet friend with the same respect we give other members? <br>
Shouldn't we avoid confrontation on articles with friends, if there can only be a poor outcome or do we engage our friends even if your points of views are so different that the outcome can only be damaging and deemed a transgression?<br>
There are many who would say, that friends, especially internet friends, should engage in dialog, because that is the purpose of this site.  I am not totally convinced that this is true because our community has very diverse views and therefore this is not always possible.  There are just certain hot button topics that make all of us lose it.  So then, the question becomes, does an internet friend leave those articles alone for the sake of the friendship or do they engage, for the sake of the topic? That is the bigger question. That goes back to the degree of friendship and the expectations one has about that friendship.  I have always been on the side of caution, and didn't engage people who I had a very differing point of view, once I had excepted their friendship, out of respect to that acceptance.  Call it a social contract on the site.  But I think you can divide the nature of internet friendships into three groups.<br>
The first group is those who befriend people carefully on the site.  They go to the potential friend and look into their bio's and their other social connections.  They are careful whom they befriend, because their expectation is to value the friendship as if it was one in the real world.  <br>
The second group is those who feel that the site is here for debate, and therefore, the friendship is a loose social association, one that is casual, and that the name of the game is debate. To them, an internet friendship is easily broken, with little mind of who is on their friend list.  They give little or no thought to whom they befriend, and therefore don't think twice about whether or not to engage a friend in a heated discussion, even if the outcome will be poor.<br>
The third group are those who make distinctions between close internet friends and casual internet friends and vary their behavior accordingly when deciding to enter a conversation with a friend, especially if their points of views are to divergent to engage in a productive dialog or debate.  They may engage in a heated debate with some friends, while with others, they will avoid a dialog that could potentially end the friendship, valuing the friendship over the debate.<br>
Some would say that true friends could always forgive each other if things get out of hand.  But this isn't true in real life.  How many of us have had a falling out with a long time personal friend, and have felt terrible about it for years to come.  On this site, most of our friendships are not that personal, and therefore, easily damaged.  Words pile up and get in the way, and all that is left behind are ruminations and bitterness, for words left in the public domain for all to see. <br>
I personally don't enter into a friend's article if I know that our points of view are too different to find a common ground and it will damage a friendship. As I said earlier, I regard it as part of the social contract with the internet.  I am all too aware that once the words I write are out there in the public domain for all to see and it's hard to erase the damage they have done. If there is something to learn from my recent experience is that all should be clear what they expect from their friendships when we engage each other in debate, because once the words are pounded out on our respective keyboards, there is no taking them back.  And there's the rub....<br>
]]></description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:14:05 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Life Is The Sound Of Distant Thunder At A Graduation - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/403/life-is-the-sound-of-distant-thunder-at-a-graduation</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/403</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[<br><br>
I wrote this almost 4 years ago and I can't believe that my daughters will be graduating from college this May. I thought it was worth the reprint, since we all get caught up in the trivial things in life, that we don't even notice it going by... and life is but a dream. <br>
So it's the day my daughters graduation. A moment I had been both looking forward to and feeling a bit blue about. My little shrews had finally gotten their wings. Did I say shrews out loud? .. I meant loving daughters... sorry, that must have been the wine talking. But even though they can be shrews.. they are my shrews and the thought of them leaving us,l eaves me with a flood of emotions. But I digress...<br>
It was supposed to be a lovely first day of summer here on Long Island... translate that to mean 93 degrees and 90 percent humidity. I have all my hair weapons on hand to prevent the frizz that will happen as I walk <!-- pagebreak -->outside the door. But after I have done my magic in the bathroom, and I look as good as a girl who just turn 52 is going to look without a trip to the plastic surgeon, I step out of the bathroom to hear what I think is distant thunder...<br>
I thought of author W. H. Auden's quote: "Death is the sound of distant thunder at a picnic." When I first read that line in one of Auden's poems many years ago, the meaning eluded me, but suddenly on graduation day, it had such clarity. For what is a graduation, but a big picnic of a sort... So I looked at the sky and it just looks hazy... yet again.. I think I hear thunder...<br>
So I yell down to Matt to check the local weather channel and see if we are expecting a storm. He reports up, "No, that's later today. 5 min later, the skies are black and Matt and I are yelling up to the girls, who are glued to their respective mirrors quaffing, to move the arses out the door before the rain. Just as we made the car, the sky opened and sheets of rain started to come down, along with lighting hitting things that we could actually see. The girls, sophisticated woman of the world that they are, started to scream like 5 year olds, and I'm thinking as I tell them to cool it... this isn't good. We drive very slowly through the rivers that were just streets a few minutes ago, to the college campus where the graduation is taking place. The storm that wasn't supposed to be, has gotten even worse, and now I can see lightning hitting in the parking lot. Of course, this paralyzes all of the families stuck in their cars. All these people had to get into the building come hell or high water... in this case both, and so we all started to wade through the ankle high water, I in my brand new shoes. Matt goes to park the car.<br>
Now Matt is a different animal to moi. His parents should have named him Felix Unger. He got out of the car and seeing the river before him that he had to cross to get into the building bends down to roll up his pants, making him invisible due to the sheets of rain. The obvious question remains why his soaking wet back doesn't bother him, but wet pant bottoms would, but hey why ask questions? He bent over to take off his shoes, when a car just barely missed hitting him...<br>
The horrified driver jumps out of the car, to see if he had actually hit Matt, and who is it? Jeff Sunshine. Now that name might sound vaguely familiar here to some of our vegan friends, since Debby Sunshine is his wife, is a member of this group, and oh yeah, my close friend. Jeff is visibly shaken, but the weather has made it an imperative to get in, and so Matt is totally unaware of how close he had come to getting hit.<br>
Again, death is the sound of distant thunder at a picnic.<br>
So we all start to find our seats now running over a half hour late, due to the weather, when we hear a bang, and suddenly... black. The auditorium's power has just gone out. No lights, no amps for the PA and NO AIR CONDITIONING! A few minutes later, the emergency generator kicks in and we have dim lights and some power for the PA, but no AC. Decisions must be made about what to do, to carry on or not. The powers that be decide to do away with all the speeches, (thank the heavens for that, literally), and to just go ahead with the graduation. I sit there in my soaking wet shoes, listening to the girls best friend, Danny, who is also class president and Valedictorian, give a beautiful speech to the class. He tells them, that after 13 years of being together, that this will be the last time in their lives that they will all be together in one place. He tells them that this event is another thing that they will be able to cross off the "Bucket List of Life". I choke up, as this observation is both profound as it is true. The class of 2012 is announced to the audience and we go back out to our car, and bump into Jeff and have him recount how close he came to whacking Matt. We make light of it, with Jeff promising to leave his business card on Matt's body next time. After all, he is a lawyer. Then we're off to dinner.<br>
We are all sitting in the restaurant. We're all having a wonderful time toasting and eating and suddenly there is a lull in the conversation. I look at my mother in law, who is in treatment for pancreatic cancer and at my dad, who ended up in hospital with pancreatitis, and I wonder is "Death is the sound of distant thunder at a picnic" or is life one long "Bucket List" or are they all really the same thing? Or am I getting way to intense, due to this big life transition?<br>
But in any case, as I squish around in my shoes and clothes in a now very cold air conditioned room and the one thing I am sure of is if there is a god, I must be his punch line. Seriously. I have given this much contemplation and I'm pretty sure he looks at me and laughs. But hey, I am sure he does the same thing to most of you from time to time. At least we're all at this picnic together.<br>
]]></description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:09:32 -0500</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Tuesdays with Morrie and Mondays with Herman - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/248/tuesdays-with-morrie-and-mondays-with-herman</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/248</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[  The book "Tuesdays with Morrie" told the very touching story of a man named Morrie, a retired philosophy Professor, dying of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) better known as Lou Gehrig's disease. The book was written by a past student of Morrie, who made it a point to visit his mentor every Tuesday and gain Morrie's pearls of wisdom before he died. I read the book and thought the story was very touching. So after I read the book, I promised myself to live my life in a positive, productive way and to savor every moment I had with my loved ones. But the lessons of the book never prepared me for what was to come. The book was trite compared to real life. <br>
  Six years ago at Thanksgiving, I looked across the table at my Uncle Herman. His mouth seemed a little droopy, his speech a little slurred. "Hey Uncle Herman", I said. "Did you notice that your mouth is kind of drooping? <!-- pagebreak --> My Aunt Phyllis, Herman's wife, interjected, "It is, isn't it. And he's slurring his words, too. I told him to go to the doctor, but he keeps saying it's nothing." "She worries too much, it's nothing", he replied in his very Brooklyn/Bronx accent. To my uncle, this was a nothing. He was very stoic, a trait found on my father's side of the family. Besides, a few months earlier, my Aunt and Uncle had lost their only child, my cousin Paul to a lung infection at the age of 41. He was unmarried and had no children. Paul was their singular joy in their life. A little droop in the corner of his mouth was the last thing on his mind. <br>
  But a month went by, and he wasn't getting better, so my aunt and I convinced my uncle that he needed to go to his doctor to rule out a stroke. After undergoing routine tests that all were negative, his doctor sent him to a neurologist. After another battery of tests, the neurologist called my Uncle and Aunt into his office. He said, "Herman, you have Bulbar ALS. I suggest, you get your life in order and spend some time with your family". That was that. My aunt couldn't get over the coldness of his tone as he told my uncle his death sentence. Having a neurological problem of my own, I knew that getting a proper diagnosis in neurology was very hit and miss, so I suggested going to Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center to get a second opinion.  <br>
  After careful testing, with multiple teams of doctors coming and going from the examination room, the diagnosis came back. My uncle Herman had Bulbar ALS. This was the worst of all possible outcomes. Bulbar ALS starts in the throat and kills the quickest. The doctors at the hospital told us that their job was to his extend his life, and to make him as comfortable as possible. And so came the routine of taking my Uncle and Aunt to and from the hospital on Mondays and Thursdays, which were clinic days. With each visit my Uncle was a little bit worse. He became harder and harder to understand as his tongue and mouth became paralyzed. This affected his swallowing, so a feeding tube had to be put into his stomach so that he wouldn't choke to death. The muscles in his arms developed twitching, known as fasciculations, which is always present in ALS and then began the muscle wasting, first his arms, then his legs. But whenever I asked him how he felt, when he could speak, he would say fine and smile and when he lost his speech, he would give me thumbs up. <br>
  But as the Mondays and Thursdays passed, he quickly deteriorated. And I began to notice that the doctors seemed very laissez faire about my uncle's condition. They never volunteered any information without us prompting them to do so. We had to ask about the drug riluzole (Rilutek), to which they replied that they could put him on the drug, but it would only help prolong his life about 3 months. Then my aunt and I asked about any drug trials that my uncle qualified for. They told us about various drug studies that used existing drugs, so I started to do my own research into other trials. During my research, I learned much about ALS, more than most. <br>
  It has been 134 years since Dr. Charcot's discovery of ALS, yet we are no closer to understanding the disease. What we do know is that ALS is a motor neuron disease. For unknown reasons, ALS causes the death of the motor neurons, the nerves that make muscles move. A person with ALS will progressively lose the use of their limbs, throat and lungs. Most people will die of suffocation. According to the Baylor Institute of Medicine, approximately 150,000 people will get ALS every year. It is estimated that as many as 30,000 Americans have the disease at any given time. The rate of ALS is 2 out of 100,000 people, or about 15 new cases a day or 6,000 new case a year. Gulf war veterans have a rate double that of the civilian population. No one has identified the reason why. There are increasing numbers of ALS clusters in the United States. For instance, according to Christine Wallgrenin of the Boston Globe, the rate is 9.5 per 100,000 in Plymouth County and across the Southeastern part of the state of Massachusetts. The number of ALS clusters is growing. No one knows why. The average life span of someone with ALS is 2 to 5 years. Because of this short life span and the quick progression of the disease, there is little patient advocacy. The patients and their families are consumed by the day-to-day challenges of living with the disease. So there is little in the way of ALS awareness, walk-a-thons, or spokespeople. The disease just fades into the background. Also there have been no large endowments for ALS and minimal government funding for research. The two biggest advocacy groups are the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association (ALSA) and Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA), both of which fight over the scant funding they get. <br>
  According to Ken O'Donnell, in his article "Advocate for a Cure for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis" and a member of Patients Like Me, which tracks ALS patients, there's an additional reason for the lack of progress in finding a cure. "The drug companies want more profits; their motivation is greed. Since it is estimated that there are 30,000 ALS sufferers alive at any one time, they consider    ALS to be an orphan disease (defined as fewer than 200,000 sufferers). The drug companies focus their research primarily on the major killers of the US population, which are heart disease, cancer, and AIDS. As a result, much progress has been made with all of these diseases. The difference is that there is major profit potential in curing AIDS, heart disease, and cancer. Unfortunately for ALS sufferers, drug companies find it hard to calculate a return on their investment in finding an effective treatment for ALS. This is the main reason that we only have one drug approved for ALS (Rilutek) in the last ten years. The drug companies will not be investing in research for ALS unless they uncover something that occurs in other major neurological diseases that would have a common use for ALS. Thus, we cannot count on these drug companies to change their research programs to focus on ALS." This leaves the financial burden of ALS research on the federal government. <br>
  On the Federal level there has been some movement made by the ALSA. According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the National ALS Registry Act, which had already passed the House last year, would have appropriated $5 million to fund the collection of data on every person diagnosed with ALS each year and an additional $5 million to continue studying why armed service veterans contract ALS more often than the general population, which the ALSA hopes will help find environmental causes for the disease. So ALS will receive $10 million annually as opposed to AIDS, which gets 1.4 billion dollars annually, according to the Nationl Center for Political Analysis. <br>
  This past July 4 will mark the 75th anniversary of Lou Gehrig's famous farewell speech at Yankee Stadium, and since then more than 600,000 Americans have shared Gehrig's fate. There have been no significant developments toward finding a cure, yet the rate of ALS is slowly growing. The ALSA will be starting a PSA featuring Angela Lansbury, whose sister died of the disease and is working to increase government funding for research, for this soon may no longer be an "orphan disease". Though this is a beginning, it is not enough. ALS knows no gender, race, creed, or age. It robs people of their bodies, and their dignity, while leaving their brains fully intact to witness their own demise. It robs families of their loved ones, and often their finances, while giving them no hope and it's been going on for too long. <br>
  I loved my Uncle Herman. He was a kind and decent man, who loved mankind, loved animals, loved pretty girls and most of all, loved his family. He never called me his niece, but his nice. And on that early spring day that we buried my beloved Uncle, I walked with my Aunt Phyllis over to my cousin's grave. I heard her say in a whisper, "Paul, I brought your daddy to keep you company". I could barely contain the tears. It was then I promised myself that I would do my part to make my Uncle's death count. Please donate to this very important under-funded disease. The life you save may be someone you love.  ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 02:31:29 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Souvenirs - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/245/souvenirs</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/245</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[          Souvenir. From the French word meaning to remember. We collect souvenirs throughout our lives. Occasionally we take them out from their dusty boxes, the scrap books we carefully constructed, or the photo albums we put them in, and look at them and remember. But the real souvenirs are the ones that are not physical, not the ones that we can actually see, but the ones that made us who we are. They are the defining moment or moments of our lives. Yet, those we rarely look at.    I have come to the conclusion that the reason for this is that for most of us, these defining moments are not pleasant. They are times that brought us some pain. Humans are odd creatures in that, the events that make us who we are, were rarely welcomed events.    With the exception of having a child or a grandchild, most of these moments that defined us as people were also the ones that brought us a level of discomfort or grief. They were thrust upon us, and the choices we made at those moments, changed us forever in some way. The human condition is such that we tend not to change by our own volition, but by circumstances beyond our control.    Tolstoy said that, "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself." He also said,"Without knowing what I am and why I am here, life is impossible." For me, these are absolute truths. Yet very few of us, take a moment to look at the events of our lives and see, why we are who we are. Introspection is a skill that many of us lack. Why is that? Does it hurt too much to look back and see how the choices we made were either right or wrong? Do we not really like the person that we are? Is it too hard to question the values and principals today, which were based on these pivotal moments? Or is it just that these moments in themselves are just like opening up an old scar? If every year is a souvenir that slowly fades away....will we open the box that contain the souvenirs of the events in our lives and look in? Can you do that, and see how they made you who you are? And if we don't like who we are, can we change ourselves. Something to ponder.  ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 02:07:21 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Things Left Unsaid - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/244/things-left-unsaid</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/244</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[  What seems like a lifetime ago, I had a very close friend, Jesse. He was everything a person should be. He was kind, good natured, brilliant, athletic, and very handsome. But to me, he was a great pal, someone I could talk to and would keep all my secrets. We cared about each other in that very special way that happens only every now and then with guy-girl friendships.    We were getting ready for spring break in my Junior year of high school. There were parties planned and vacations, too. The Friday night of spring break I had plans to go to a party with my friends, and then the next day I was leaving for a short car trip with my family. I had seen Jesse during that Friday at school. He had decided not to go to the party, but instead to go and visit our favorite teacher at her home with another friend of ours, Mark.    He said to me not to forget to say "Goodbye" before we left school that day, since I wasn't going to see him at the party. But being a 16 year old, I was consumed with other things. The day ended and I never said "Goodbye". I went to the party and had a great time.    The next morning, I had a very early phone call from another friend. He told me that after Jesse and Mark had visited our teacher, that Jesse, who was a new driver, had lost control of the car and hit a tree. They both had died in the accident. I got off the phone and cried. It was then I realized that I had never said "Goodbye" to Jesse, as he asked. I felt haunted by my lack of consideration to his request. Did he feel something was coming, or did he want me to say goodbye to acknowledge that we cared about each other. A goodbye is such a simple yet meaningful way of saying, "Even though we're apart, I'm still thinking of you."    I sat through Mark's funeral mass and cried my eyes out. But when I went to pay a Shiva call to Jesse's family, I sat calmly with my friends, who were shocked by what seemed like a lack of emotion. Those who knew him less than me were crying, while I sat there silent. I was consumed with guilt over a simple request to say "Goodbye". I never got the chance to say to him for the last time, that even though we're apart, I care about you and I'll be thinking of you. It is a lesson I still keep in my heart.    We all have people in our lives that we care for and love. In the busyness of our lives, we often forget to say the little things to them to let them know how we feel. Sometimes, we never get that second chance. We should all try to take the time to say our "Hellos" and "Goodbyes" To acknowledge that you care about them and that you're thinking of them, as if you may never see these people again. It's far better than leaving things left unsaid.  ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:24:23 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[In Good Company... Aspergers and Autism. - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/242/in-good-company-aspergers-and-autism</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/242</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[  When my nephew was about two and a half, we began no notice that he had a peculiar habit. He would arrange his cars in size order. When you changed the order of the cars, He would quickly change the cars back order from smallest to largest. He would persist in this activity, and get increasingly upset each time you changed the order of the cars. Soon after, we began to notice that everything in his room had an order, whether it was books, stuffed animals or trains. And then there were those trains. By the time he was three, he could tell you everything about trains. He knew all the models of trains, the year they were first built, the types of tracks that they used and all the major stations that the trains ran through. This was his sole interest, and if you were not interested in trains, that was tough. He was going to tell you about them anyway.    There were other little things about my nephew that were a bit different. He had poor impulse control. If he liked a little girl in his nursery school class, he would jump out of his seat and kiss her. This did cause problems with some of the girl's moms, who didn't see this as cute. He was a bit klutzy. He winced when he was nervous or upset. He didn't follow class rules and spoke out of turn.    Sometimes he would just burst out and say what was on his mind at that moment, and he had a very busy mind. I had noticed that he was a little different. But being an elementary school teacher, I have had so many students that were a little different, that I saw it as no big deal. To me, if a child is a different kind of learner, it's your responsibility as a teacher to adapt your teaching for that child. My sister saw things differently. Between the teachers making such a big deal about his behavior, and what she saw at home, my sister began to worry. We come from a long line of worriers....    So after much research on the internet, my sister had her suspicions about his condition. She took him to the top doctor in the field, and after an extensive examination, he and my sister got their diagnosis. My nephew had Aspergers. Aspergers is a condition given to children who have "Autism Spectrum Disorder". According to the Autism Society, "One of the major differences between Asperger's Disorder and autism is that, by definition, there is no speech delay in Asperger's. In fact, children with Asperger's Disorder frequently have good language skills; they simply use language in different ways. Speech patterns may be unusual, lack inflection or have a rhythmic nature, or it may be formal, but too loud or high pitched. Children with Asperger's Disorder may not understand the subtleties of language, such as irony and humor, or they may not understand the give-and- take nature of a conversation.    Another distinction between Asperger's Disorder and autism concerns cognitive ability. While some individuals with autism experience mental retardation, by definition a person with Asperger's Disorder cannot possess a "clinically significant" cognitive delay and most possess average to above average intelligence. While motor difficulties are not a specific criteria for Asperger's, children with Asperger's Disorder frequently have motor skill delays and may appear clumsy or awkward."    My sister was understandably distraught about the diagnosis. My nephew was officially labeled, with all the limitations that came with having that label. I was not. I wasn't in denial about his condition, it's just that nothing had really changed. All he had now was a label for his unique behavior. He was no "Rain Man" Hs was charming, super bright, very empathetic, though hard to deal with. His limitations were minor in my eyes. In my teaching career, I had seen much worse, like the "crack children" of the 1990's. His special needs, were minimal compared to those children. Yet, most of them went on to develop the life skills and education they needed to live productive lives. I knew in my heart, that he would be just fine.    In the months and years to come, the label allowed my nephew to get special services. He had an physical therapy for his gross motor skills. He had some speech therapy. When he entered the public school system, they provided him with a para professional to integrate him into the classroom experience. he has grown and developed into the adolescent I expected him to be. He is beyond bright, cheerful, loving and quite the chatter box. Is he still challenging as a child? Well, I would have to say yes. Did the label of being on the "Autistic Spectrum" hurt or help him. I would have to say both. As parents, it hurt my sister and brother in law to know that they had a special needs child. As a family, we reminded the both of them, that nothing had really changed. All that had happened was what educators and evaluators are quick to do, they label him. But I kept telling my sister that the label need not be a limitation. On the other hand, the label was helpful. By labeling my nephew, it got him the special education he needed. He thrived with the additional help he got, and if that was the cost of the label, then so be it. Parents need to keep in mind a label only hurts if you let it consume you and define your child. Once you move beyond the label, your child is only limited by your expectations. Have high ones, and your child will rise to the occasion.    There has been much speculation about people like Albert Einstein and Bill Gates having Aspergers. We may never know if it's true. But if it is, that's fine with me. My nephew will be in good company.  ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 02:10:43 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[In the living years - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/241/in-the-living-years</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/241</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[  Crumpled bits of paper    Filled with imperfect thought    Stilted conversations    I'm afraid that's all we've got    You say you just don't see it    He says it's perfect sense    You just can't get agreement    In this present tense    We all talk a different language    Talking in defense    My childhood friend and stylist to the stars, Phillip Bloch, wrote an article to his deceased father on the first Father's Day that he had without him. Like many of us, he had had his differences with his dad. He talked of words now exchanged, that can no longer be taken back. The issues that seemed so important to him in life, no longer seemed as important to him now that his dad passed. As I read the article I cried. I cried because I knew his dad and had always had a warm relationship with him. I cried; for my friend, who was now regretting moments he could no longer fix. I cried because like my friend Phillip, I too, have had rough patches with my own mother and wondering it there is any possibility to fix them. There have been so many years of damage. Sometimes, because of situations and family dynamics you just can't find agreement, in the present tense ; a parents expectation of a child sharing their beliefs and values, only to find disappointment when they don't ; A child's frustration, in trying to get the parent to understand these differences, feeling a disconnect when their parents can't seem to bend.    This pattern of behavior has been going on since the beginning of time. It is not exclusive to parent and child relationships. It is played out in marriages, friendships and where ever there are human relationships, and it's this pattern that is the hardest to break. But why?    So we open up a quarrel    Between the present and the past       We only sacrifice the future    It's the bitterness that lasts    So Don't yield to the fortunes    You sometimes see as fate    It may have a new perspective    On a different day    And if you don't give up, and don't give in    You may just be O.K.    We all live within the confines and definitions of our relationships and as life proceeds, we encounter a series of situations and issues. The situations are not always avoidable. Birth order, loss of a job, a home, a spouse, a family, a child, death, these are just examples of the situations we can't control. How we deal with them, may or may not lead to misunderstandings. But it is not these that usually bring about a deep divide, although they can. It is usually specific issues that enter a relationship that we become reactionary to. And more often than not, these issues arise and arise again, and with each time, old wounds are opened and scares deepened, with the ending result being that both parties become more resolved in the idea that there can never be compromise. Somewhere in relationships, the mix of emotions become fused with the issue, instead of logic and emotion is the over riding propellant, leading us further and further apart. Compound these feelings with human pride, and you have a toxic combination for permanent barriers. Yet, this is not what most of us seek. We would like resolution, it just that we want it on our own terms. Oddly, it's when we don't give in and we don't give up, that we find is shocking that nothing is OK. We have only deepened the divide between those that we care for. All we have is the cold comfort of feeling right. And although, we may, indeed, be right, does that actually make us feel better? In many cases the answer is no. And although compromise may be a possibility, often, issues are seen in black and white. So the question then becomes, which is more important to us? To be right, but loose the relationship or the connection to that individual, or to look away, or compromise and keep the relationship?    Say it loud, say it clear    You can listen as well as you hear    It's too late when we die    To admit we don't see eye to eye    Death is so final. For my friend, death left him no chance to set things straight with his father. But for many of us, this is not the case. There is a chance to put aside the anger and hurt. There is a chance to gain understanding. Most of us can hear, but choose not to listen when the other side is speaking. And the times when it would be better for our relationships not to listen, but put aside the other persons pattern of behavior, to not hear those words that hurt, and try to get past them, that we most often hear those words, and so the cycle continues. We all have a chance, to change these things, if we get passed our pride, our hurt and anger, to admit that we don't see eye to eye and move on, but more often than not we don't. Maybe we would, if we just realized that we can only do this in the living years.  ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 02:10:12 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Gays in America and Gays in Russia - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/219/gays-in-america-and-gays-in-russia</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/219</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[ A while back I had a debate with an old friend of mine about a discussion on the percentage of gays    that make up our population. I had told him that I had seen an article by the AMA that said that 9-10% of the population was gay. He said it was more like 3-4% During this debate, we went back and forth on the numbers, but my main point was that we would never get a clear number, since being gay in America wasn't still an accepted due to social and family pressures and so I was sure that many people would be apt to lie about their sexual preference on any survey.  For the last 20 years, organizations like  NARTH , have been pressuring the AMA to change this 9-10% figure to 3-4%. You can find one such letter  here . The AMA did eventually adjust their numbers based on a  Gallup survey of 120,000 Americans. These results are based on responses to the question, "Do you, personally, identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender?" The results were that 3.4 said yes, 92.2 said no and 4.4 said don't know or refused. It's that last number I would like to take a look at. Straight people say they are straight, but by declining by either saying you don't know or you refused, indicates you have some doubts about your sexuality or you something to hide and don't want to lie. So suddenly that 3.4 becomes more like 7.8, which is a lot closer to the AMA's original number. Now add a few straights from that poll, who don't want to be outed and you get your 9% that the AMA claimed years ago.  I understand that many people will say that I am surmising here. But if we got real with ourselves, we know that there are loads of gays living on the "Down low", hence the term. All anyone has to do is look at Hollywood. In by gone years, there was many a closet gay man. Macho men like Rock Hudson, family guys like Dick York, Dick Sargent, the iconic Robert Reed of the "Brady Bunch", These men only came out at the end of their lives. Only more recently have men like "Star Trek's" George Takei and "Doogie Howser's" Neil Patrick Harris came out. None of these men seem the least bit gay. I remembered being shocked upon hearing it. They hid it so well, at the time. I am sure with organizations like NARTH, I know some are still hiding it, as I have friends who have yet to "come out".  Which brings me to an interesting event that happened this week in Hollywood. Very masculine, heart- throb, Wentworth Miller, who was well known for his performance as the fearless Michael Scofield, in the Fox's "Prison Break", casually came out to the world that he is a gay man, by taking a stand about Russia's criminalizationof homosexuality, by openly declining to attend an invitation in an letter to the St. Petersburg International Film Festival.       As a gay man, I must decline, Miller wrote in his  letter  . I am deeply troubled by the current attitude toward and treatment of gay men and women by the Russian government. The situation is in no way acceptable, and I cannot in good conscience participate in a celebratory occasion hosted by a country where people like myself are being systematically denied their basic right to live and love openly.      One has to admire his no fanfair approach to both coming out and standing on hisprinciples. Still, it was surprising that he never stated his sexual preference before. It could have been that he just wanted his privacy or maybe he felt he couldn't get work as a leading man. But this is allsupposition. Two things can be drawn from this event. The first is that there is no way to tell how many gay and lesbians there are in our population, since there is still enough of a social taboo, that many still choose to keep it private. The other thing is, that no matter how far we need to go to get total acceptance for the homosexual community, Russia seems to have gone willingly backwards. Which leads me to wonder, how easy would it be for us to go backwards. I guess only time will tell.  ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 14:36:10 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[NYPD and the Muslim Spying Issue. - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/11/nypd-and-the-muslim-spying-issue</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/11</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[ As a New Yorker and a 9/11 survivor, I will not deny that I find the security of New York City of theutmostimportance. After 9/11, the NYPD developed on of the most aggressive intelligence agencies in the nation. It's goal was simple. Covert surveillanceof the Muslim community to get information that could lead tothwartingany further attacks in NYC. As a New Yorker, I support these activities. To me, it all comes down to this: if you are doing nothing, than you have nothing to hide.  The AP carried an interesting article debating whether or not the NYPDactivitieswere violations of civil rights of the Muslim community. You can read the Q&amp;A article here . But I would like to focus on two questions in particular from the article:   Q: Is that legal?  A: The NYPD says it definitely is. Civil rights lawyers say some of it, like keeping police files on innocent religious sermons, is definitely not.  Some of what was done, like monitoring public Internet sites or visiting businesses, was likely lawful, since police can go wherever the public can go. There are disagreements, however, about whether police can legally catalog innocent people in police files without some allegation of wrongdoing. The FBI, for instance, is prohibited from doing so.  These questions aren't likely to be settled anytime soon. The NYPD's tactics are regulated by a court order in a decades-old lawsuit over police spying on anti-war protesters and political groups during the 1960s and 1970s. Civil rights lawyers have asked a judge to look into these most recent police activities, but the legal process moves slowly.  Q: So this all might be legal. Then what's the controversy about?  A: Like many counterterrorism programs of the last decade, including waterboarding, secret CIA prisons, warrantless wiretapping and drone attacks, the revelations about the NYPD spying programs have prompted a vigorous debate about whether they are good policy, not just whether they are legal.  The NYPD surveillance has made many Muslims feel like suspects for attending services in mosques, participating in student groups or eating in restaurants in their neighborhoods.  "People are saying they are afraid to pray in mosques," said Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker, whose city's Muslim neighborhoods were under NYPD surveillance. "They are afraid to eat in restaurants. A chill has been put on my community; the pain and the anguish is real."  The NYPD's programs also touch on one of the major questions in counterterrorism: How can authorities fight terrorism without ostracizing entire neighborhoods and reinforcing the notion that America is at war with Islam, a belief that al-Qaida has promoted in its recruiting.  New York leaders say they have built strong, successful programs to reach out into Muslim neighborhoods   First of all, the AP story is a bit conflicted. Throwing in waterboarding and drone attacks into this discussion, is way over the top, since that has never happened. It'shyperboleto amp up the debate. It is irresponsible journalism.  May I also point out, that because of the NYPD CounterterrorismDivision, events like the "Time Square Car Bomber" was thwarted. In one of my life's greatest ironies, I was in the exact spot in Times Square, the night before the attempted bombing. As I looked around, that evening, I saw a swath of humanity, enjoying a warm spring evening, and I am sure, that there were Muslims in the crowd, too, just like there was on 9/11 in the towers. This program serves the greater good, so why try to discredit them?  Maybe the question should be, who is trying to discredit them. According to a  Forbes article, it is Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). According to the article " the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has issued yet another condemnatory statement calling for an investigation into NYPD counterterrorism programs. Accusing the force of spying on innocent Muslims, lying, and of civil rights violations, CAIR called the NYPD disingenuous in excluding them from planned meetings with other Muslims groups and Muslim leaders whom CAIR contends are not representative of the constituency or the concerns of New York City Muslim communities.    Interesting. Not a shocker. Because as the Forbes article also pointed out:    " True enough, CAIR, which is explicitly barred from any involvement with Federal law enforcement counterterrorism investigations as a result of its ties to Islamist groups like Hamas, received no invitations to attend the NYPD discussions, nor has it been asked to consult on NYPD counterterrorism procedures in general. But if the organization means to suggest that they are the group that best represents the constituency of the New York Muslim community, we have a problem: CAIR has, after all, not only enduring connections with Hamas and terrorism financiers, but is closely tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and its Islamic Association for Palestine , under which it was first founded in 1994."  This is not to say, that I think that most Muslims in New York are members of CAIR or are not good New Yorkers. Quite the contrary, I think they are. But the members of CAIR, I have my doubts about. It's CAIR and not the Muslim Community at large, that is doing all the complaining. Why? Because it is CAIR, and not the Muslim community at large, that has the ties to the terrorist groups that the NYPD is looking into.  But let's clear up some myths about profiling and the NYPD. There is nothing new about the NYPD investigating criminal activity based on ethnicity or national origin. They kept tabs on the "Westies", and Irish gang that took over the "Hell's Kitchen" part of Manhattan andspecificlocal Italian families, in both Manhattan, Brooklyn and Queens. No cries about profiling then.  The NYPD's Muslims, have formed the NYPD Officer Society with it's own Imam. No complaints from them about profiling.  The greater Muslim community came together on March 5, 2012, in support of the NYPD. From their  officialstatement of this event:  " Representatives of over 20 Muslim organizations and activists affiliated with the American Islamic Leadership Coalition (AILC) will gather on Monday, March 5, 2012 at One Police Plaza in New York City to demonstrate their support of the New York City Police Department (NYPD). The event starts at 10:00 AM EST and will be joined by Congressman Peter King (R-NY), Chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security."    On March 5, this is what they said, We, as Muslims, should be monitoring extremism. The more we exaggerate necessary monitoring, the more we will inflame Muslims and Islamists. Where are the responsible Muslims? Here we are.      Finally,  Pakistani-American counterterrorism expert and author Farhana Qazi affirmed:  NYPDs surveillance of any ethnic minority group is for the overall protection of US national security interest. There have been far too many threats by individual American Muslims in New YorkCity, which warrants additional security measures.The best way to promote peace in the city is further collaboration between American Muslims and the police to promote understanding and break down the barriers of misunderstanding.  9/11 changed the life of every New Yorker, Muslim and non-Muslim alike. You can't go into Penn Station, without seeing troopers, fully weaponed. There are armed stops at all our tunnels and bridges. The troopers are seen at highly visited sites. My own husband was detained as JFK Airport, under what some would consider racial profiling. What we as New Yorkes have come to accept it when the Towers came down on 9/11, so did a way of life for all New Yorkers.But all reasonable New Yorkers of all faiths and all colors know, that this is done for our protection and that goes for the NYPD's CounterterrorismDivision. Only CAIR has complaints about that and one should wonder why.   ]]></description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:29:35 -0400</pubDate>
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title><![CDATA[My Thoughts on Politics from an Independent's Perspective. - @perrie-halpern]]></title>
                <link>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/4/my-thoughts-on-politics-from-an-independents-perspective</link>
                <guid>http://thenewstalkers.com/perrie-halpern/blog/4</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Being an Independent is an odd seat to be in at the political table. We are wedge between the Democrats and Liberals to the left of us and Republicans and Conservatives to the right. Unlike those sitting at the ends of the table, we want to talk to both sides, but it's very hard to have our voices heard at either end. It's quite a frustrating experience to have to yell to be heard. And like playing the game of "Telephone" by the time our message has been transmitted down the table, it is often twisted and misunderstood.More often than not, we end up unwittingly playing an odd game of "Devil's Advocate". You see, for us, we want to make other people think outside their comfort zone. And so, we take stances on things that we don't fully buy into, but would like to explore with our fellow Americans. But to those who are loyal to one position or the other, this looks like we have taken a side. More often, instead of exploring the concept it's self, it is mocked and dismissed, just because it doesn't fit in with a specific ideology. The net result is, that it looks like we have picked a side, which ultimately ticks someone off, which in turn just frustrates us more.This condition, is a sad state of affairs. After all, the majority of Americans are independents. Yet, our voice is seldom heard, much less understood. We are the "Fence Sitters", or "Democrats/Republicans in sheep's clothing" Nothing could be father from the truth. We view politics much like dinner at a ChineseRestaurant. We sit at a round table instead of a long one. We each choose from the menu, one from column A and 2 from column B and then share our plates with each other. We might not like every flavor at the table, but we are all willing to give it a taste before we decide. This is a far different experience from sitting at the long table with folks to the left and right of us and we only get a choice of two dishes. We actually enjoy discussing the food with each other, and the round table is a good way to get our thoughtsacross, even if at the end of the meal, we still hold specific dishes as our favorite.Recently, I wrote an article about OWS and the 99%. Never in my wildest dreams did I think it would have gotten the response that it did. I thought I was exploring the ideas that they presented. Did I write itpassionately? Sure! Who wants to read an Op Ed that is boring? But I never thought that it would have people digging their heals in the way that they did. I am not a member of OWS, and I might hold some sympathies with the 99% ( BTW they are different movements), but the point of the article was to make people think. Instead, what I got, were positions taken, instead of an exchange of ideas. I found that very disappointing. I was hoping to be at the round table and not the long one. Even more frustrating, is that I was told what mypositionwas, which I found odd. I actually have nopositionon this movement, other than to note that there seems to be a growing frustration within the American people and that these movements, just like the Tea Party, are a reflection of this discontentment. Being branded was never my objective, and in fact, I found it beyond annoying. What I wanted were some people from the long table to just join us for a little while at the round one. Hey, maybe you'd like something there? But you see this is the sad state of politics these days. The need topigeonhole a person. There is adiscomfortin not knowing where someone sits, and for those Americans who are part of the party system, it looks like to you, thatindependentsjust want to play musical chairs, when in fact; we just want you to try some different food, even if you don't end up liking it. You can't tell if something is too spicy or too bland without trying it. Yet, we get very few who even want to taste a little.If we are going to get on as a nation, we are going to have to start to think about the table we are sitting at. It might be easier to find our place card at the long table, but in fact, more folks are sitting at the round one, trying out different foods. We would like you to join us at that round table. It really isn't scary not having a place card. Just pull up a seat and one of us will move over a bit. We'll be glad for the extra company. Cross posted in the NewsTalkers Forum]]></description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:35:11 -0500</pubDate>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>