New Bombshell: Emails Show Hunter Biden Helped Arrange White House Meeting for CCP Elites

  
Via:  1776 Traditional American  •  5 days ago  •  321 comments

By:   Bronson Stocking

New Bombshell: Emails Show Hunter Biden Helped Arrange White House Meeting for CCP Elites
According to Breitbart, Biden and his business associates secured a "private, off-the-books" meeting between Joe Biden and a delegation of Chinese investors and Communist Party officials. A 2011 email reportedly includes a discussion of developing relations with "China Inc." and a "new push on soft diplomacy for the Chinese."

Sponsored by group The Donald on Newstalkers

The Donald on Newstalkers

Joe Biden is the ultimate swamp creature.  He completely swims in corruption and I’ll gotten gains for himself and his family for decades.  Now we see that not only did he interfere in Ukraine holding American tax payer aid hostage to their treatment of his sons company, he’s been in bed with communist China all along.  Fortunately this story is better protected from the pro democrat bias censorship of Twitter and Facebook than the Mew York Post’s was


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



24e3deaa-5f96-48e9-9eb5-7dc1caf22d4b-500x250.png

Source: AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Breitbart is reporting that one of Hunter Biden's business partners has turned over emails allegedly showing how Hunter Biden and his associates helped communist-aligned Chinese officials secure private meetings with the Obama-Biden White House. It's the first business associate of Hunter Biden to confirm that Hunter enriched himself by trading on his father's influence. The emails are unconnected to the other emails at the center of the New York Post reporting. 

The new emails detail how Hunter Biden and his associates used their access to Hunter's father, Vice President Joe Biden, to arrange private White House meetings for clients and investors. According to Breitbart, Biden and his business associates secured a "private, off-the-books" meeting between Joe Biden and a delegation of Chinese investors and Communist Party officials. A 2011 email reportedly includes a discussion of developing relations with "China Inc." and a "new push on soft diplomacy for the Chinese." 

The emails were turned over to Peter Schweizer by Bevan Cooney, a former business associate of Hunter Biden who is currently behind bars for a bond fraud investment scheme. Cooney contacted Schweizer after reading Schweizer's book Secret Empires,  exposing how corrupt politicians abuse their office to enrich themselves and their families. Breitbart says Cooney believes he was the "fall guy" for the bond investment scheme and that Hunter Biden and another associate, Devon Archer, have unfairly avoided responsibility for their involvement. 

(Via Breitbart


The emails offer a unique window into just how the Biden universe conducted business during the Obama-Biden Administration. These associates sought to trade on Hunter Biden’s relationship with, and access to, his father and the Obama-Biden White House in order to generate business.

For instance, on November 5, 2011, one of Archer’s business contacts forwarded him an email teasing an opportunity to gain “potentially outstanding new clients” by helping to arrange White House meetings for a group of Chinese executives and government officials. The group was the China Entrepreneur Club (CEC) and the delegation included Chinese billionaires, Chinese Communist Party loyalists, and at least one “respected diplomat” from Beijing. Despite its benign name, CEC has been called “a second foreign ministry” for the People’s Republic of China—a communist government that closely controls most businesses in its country. CEC was established in 2006 by a group of businessmen and Chinese government diplomats.

...

Hunter Biden and Devon Archer apparently delivered for the Chinese Communist Party-connected industrial elites within ten days .

...

The Obama-Biden Administration archives reveal that this Chinese delegation did indeed visit the White House on November 14, 2011, and enjoyed high-level access. The delegation included approximately thirty members, according to White House visitor logs. But those records also obscure perhaps the most important item for the Chinese delegation: a meeting with Vice President Joe Biden himself.

...

The relationships established during that visit may have benefited Hunter Biden and Devon Archer down the road. Two years later, they famously helped to form the Chinese government funded Bohai Harvest RST (BHR) investment fund. One of BHR’s first major portfolio investments was a ride-sharing company like Uber called Didi Dache—now called Didi Chuxing Technology Co. That company is closely connected to Liu Chuanzhi, the chairman of the China Entrepreneur Club (CEC) and the founder of Legend Holdings—the parent company of Lenovo, one of the world’s largest computer companies. Liu is a former Chinese Communist Party delegate and was a leader of the 2011 CEC delegation to the White House. 

So that Twitter doesn't use the same excuse of saying the emails were hacked in order to censor the report, as they did with the New York Post reporting, Breitbart notes the emails were obtained after Cooney provided written authorization to access the email account -- with a password provided by Cooney -- and to publish the material.

Twitter took the unprecedented step of censoring New York Post reports that call into question Joe Biden's involvement in his son's overseas business activities and the extent to which Hunter Biden was paid for access to his father. 

The Republican National Committee filed an FEC complaint on Friday over Twitter's apparent in-kind political contribution to the Biden campaign. 

Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have said  Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey will be subpoenaed before the committee to provide emergency testimony regarding the company's decision to interfere in the election.   

Joe Biden is a swamp creature who appears to have helped his son sell access to the White House. Voters deserve to know what Joe Biden did the last time he was in the White House before they think about sending him back for another four years. 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
MAGA
1  seeder  MAGA    5 days ago


The emails offer a unique window into just how the Biden universe conducted business during the Obama-Biden Administration. These associates sought to trade on Hunter Biden’s relationship with, and access to, his father and the Obama-Biden White House in order to generate business.

For instance, on November 5, 2011, one of Archer’s business contacts forwarded him an email teasing an opportunity to gain “potentially outstanding new clients” by helping to arrange White House meetings for a group of Chinese executives and government officials. The group was the China Entrepreneur Club (CEC) and the delegation included Chinese billionaires, Chinese Communist Party loyalists, and at least one “respected diplomat” from Beijing. Despite its benign name, CEC has been called “a second foreign ministry” for the People’s Republic of China—a communist government that closely controls most businesses in its country. CEC was established in 2006 by a group of businessmen and Chinese government diplomats.

...

Hunter Biden and Devon Archer apparently delivered for the Chinese Communist Party-connected industrial elites within ten days .

...

The Obama-Biden Administration archives reveal that this Chinese delegation did indeed visit the White House on November 14, 2011, and enjoyed high-level access. The delegation included approximately thirty members, according to White House visitor logs. But those records also obscure perhaps the most important item for the Chinese delegation: a meeting with Vice President Joe Biden himself.

...

The relationships established during that visit may have benefited Hunter Biden and Devon Archer down the road. Two years later, they famously helped to form the Chinese government funded Bohai Harvest RST (BHR) investment fund. One of BHR’s first major portfolio investments was a ride-sharing company like Uber called Didi Dache—now called Didi Chuxing Technology Co. That company is closely connected to Liu Chuanzhi, the chairman of the China Entrepreneur Club (CEC) and the founder of Legend Holdings—the parent company of Lenovo, one of the world’s largest computer companies. Liu is a former Chinese Communist Party delegate and was a leader of the 2011 CEC delegation to the White House. 

So that Twitter doesn't use the same excuse of saying the emails were hacked in order to censor the report, as they did with the New York Post reporting, Breitbart notes the emails were obtained after Cooney provided written authorization to access the email account -- with a password provided by Cooney -- and to publish the material.

Twitter took the unprecedented step of censoring New York Post reports that call into question Joe Biden's involvement in his son's overseas business activities and the extent to which Hunter Biden was paid for access to his father. 

The Republican National Committee filed an FEC complaint on Friday over Twitter's apparent in-kind political contribution to the Biden campaign. 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2020/10/16/hunter-biden-business-partner-turns-over-emails-showing-hunter-arranged-white-house-meetings-n2578257

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  MAGA @1    5 days ago

Breitbart and Townhall are not valid/reputable sources.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    5 days ago

But you are completely and utterly incapable of providing even one teensy bit of evidence to dispute what was written, aren't you---as usual.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.1    5 days ago

You can not disprove a made-up lie. If I say that Joe Blow met with your local mechanic to make a deal, how do you disprove that?

Unless they are willing to show us what they have, they have nothing but hearsay, which doesn't count.

Or we can revisit Trump's Russia/China connection? See how that works?

You can't throw crap at the wall and hope it sticks...

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.3  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    5 days ago

They are completely and totally both despite the biased opinion of some.  I noticed that you had nothing to say about the Biden crime family syndicate and their connections and loyalties to the Communist Party of China.  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.4  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.2    5 days ago

The Trump Russia connection is a made up lie while the Hillary Russia one and the Biden China connections are quite real and totally true.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.2    5 days ago

I have made one comment on this seed:

"But you are completely and utterly incapable of providing even one teensy bit of evidence to dispute what was written, aren't you---as usual."

Please do relate what crap you think I have thrown at the wall in hopes it sticks within the confines of what I actually wrote.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.6  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.1    5 days ago

There’s this smoking gun...

The Obama-Biden Administration archives reveal that this Chinese delegation did indeed visit the White House on November 14, 2011, and enjoyed high-level access. The delegation included approximately thirty members, according to White House visitor logs. But those records also obscure perhaps the most important item for the Chinese delegation: a meeting with Vice President Joe Biden himself.

https://thenewstalkers.com/release-the-kraken/group_discuss/10681/new-bombshell-emails-show-hunter-biden-helped-arrange-white-house-meeting-for-ccp-elites#cm1435410

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.7  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.2    5 days ago

The story is now about corroboration. Even the Biden campaign will not deny it. This thing will only grow. Biden can't simply call a CBS reporter biased for asking about it.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.2    5 days ago
You can't throw crap at the wall and hope it sticks...

It was done by the msm for 3 years - and it stuck!

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  MAGA @1.1.6    5 days ago

Well, apparently, some will refuse to believe that any such meeting ever took place.

Even when the WH visitor logs tell them otherwise.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.10  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.7    5 days ago

A CBS reporter?  So this is at least somewhat live in the lamestream media and not some made up lie....

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.11  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.8    5 days ago

But that was done to Trump by the democrats and msm so that was all ok...../s 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.12  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.9    5 days ago

So it would seem.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.13  Vic Eldred  replied to  MAGA @1.1.10    5 days ago

Only one man dared ask the question at this point, but as long as this is going to be a main topic at Trump rallies, Joe Biden will have to face it sooner or later and Trump victories have a way of multiplying. Yes sir, the dems had all of Wall Street flooding them with money, but they are worried again!

The best part of this is that reference of "10 for the big guy." That indicates that Joe Biden got money from China through Hunter. That drives a stake right through the heart of this dishonest proxy campaign the democrats have constructed!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.14  Sean Treacy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.2    5 days ago
I say that Joe Blow met with your local mechanic to make a deal, how do you disprove that

You start by deniyng the meeting happened.  Biden hasn't done that.

hey have nothing but hearsay, which doesn't count

documents can't be dismissed as hearsay. Nor are logs from the White House. 

u can't throw crap at the wall and hope it sticks..

That's what the Biden cheerleaders are doing. 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.15  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.14    5 days ago

Well said. jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
cjcold
1.1.16  cjcold  replied to  MAGA @1.1.4    5 days ago

Mueller wrote that were Trump not a sitting president that he would be prosecuted for his many crimes.

Trump's few remaining years will be spent in court and in prison where he belongs.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.17  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.14    5 days ago

Obama's first reaction was right - "Joe, don't embarrass yourself."  The entire establishment endorsed him, dressed him up, coddled him and probably gave him drugs to help him focus and now it will be Joe who takes the fall. (No Katie Couric ever got near enough to ask Joe what he reads).

I'm predicting a red wave!

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.18  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.13    5 days ago

Trump at his rallies yesterday was openly quoting e-nails being censored by Twitter and Facebook and those who use them.  With all those who livestream his events and it being repeated in local media and elsewhere we’ve effectively run their blockade.  When liberal social media make something off limits we in conservative media will find other ways and other channels to get it out there and publish it more widely because they did use content control to try to limit the impact of Biden’s crimes.  Big tech social media will have to ban all conservative and Christian media sources because if they limit one we will use others to work around their efforts at content control.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1.19  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @1.1.4    5 days ago
The Trump Russia connection is a made up lie while the Hillary Russia

Prove it.

the Biden China connections are quite real and totally true.  

Prove it

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1.20  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.7    5 days ago
The story is now about corroboration. Even the Biden campaign will not deny it. This thing will only grow. Biden can't simply call a CBS reporter biased for asking about it.

It's a nothing burger. 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.21  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.17    5 days ago

I sincerely hope that your red wave prediction comes true.  America and the American people are counting on it.  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.22  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.20    5 days ago

Prove it!  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1.23  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.14    5 days ago
You start by deniyng the meeting happened. 

Really? Why would anyone even give credence to such a stupid accusation? 

documents can't be dismissed as hearsay. Nor are logs from the White House. 

Then let's see them and if there were meetings, I there should be some sort of record of the discussions. 

u can't throw crap at the wall and hope it sticks.. That's what the Biden cheerleaders are doing. 

But Biden....

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1.24  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @1.1.22    5 days ago

You're funny! 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.25  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.20    5 days ago
It's a nothing burger. 

Facebook and Twitter wouldn't have exposed themselves to charges of blatant bias if it were a "nothing burger."

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.26  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.19    5 days ago
Prove it.

It has been proven!   Do you deny that fact?

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/russia-investigation-mueller-trump-gregg-jarrett

The link I'm using is a random one of many. Hopefully you are not going to contest the Russia hoax that was a coup attempt!

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.27  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.26    5 days ago

It would seem so.  I’m funny it seems as well.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.28  Sean Treacy  replied to  cjcold @1.1.16    5 days ago
wrote that were Trump not a sitting president that he would be prosecuted for his many crimes

No, he didn't.  Stop deflecting with fake news. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.29  Vic Eldred  replied to  MAGA @1.1.21    5 days ago

I think I've got Chris Matthews tingle.

You remember him right?

th?id=OIP.Dc8OwAC567o9tU6uqPqvHAEsDX&pid=Api&rs=1&c=1&qlt=95&w=162&h=116

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.30  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.26    5 days ago

But Fox News!  Just thought I’d say it to discount their notion before another brings it up intending to discount it. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1.31  MrFrost  replied to  MAGA @1.1.18    5 days ago

Trump at his rallies yesterday was openly quoting e-nails being censored by Twitter and Facebook and those who use them.  With all those who livestream his events and it being repeated in local media and elsewhere we’ve effectively run their blockade.  When liberal social media make something off limits we in conservative media will find other ways and other channels to get it out there and publish it more widely because they did use content control to try to limit the impact of Biden’s crimes.  Big tech social media will have to ban all conservative and Christian media sources because if they limit one we will use others to work around their efforts at content control.  

The information was blocked because it was Russian based propaganda given to Russian Rudy and leaked to a pro trump fake news news paper. Rudy is Russia's useful idiot. We have known this since 2016, the right just either ignored it or did what they usually do, claim it's not true. That's on you, not everyone else. 

https://www.businessinsider.com/officials-told-white-house-russian-intelligence-targeted-rudy-giuliani-report-2020-10

Rudy is a Russian asset. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1.32  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.26    5 days ago
was a coup attempt!

No, it was an investigation. Trump supporters planning to abduct a governor and over throw the government is a coup. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.33  Vic Eldred  replied to  MAGA @1.1.27    5 days ago

I think there was someone called Will Rogers who used to combine social commentary, unpleasant facts and humor. You may be in rare company.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.34  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.29    5 days ago

Biden gets those affects on his own leg when children rub his sensitive blonde hairs there, and he said so himself. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.35  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.32    5 days ago
No, it was an investigation.

No it was a farce based on nothing and fraudulently started. It went on for years, even though the FBI knew Donald Trump had never colluded with Russia.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.36  Vic Eldred  replied to  MAGA @1.1.34    5 days ago

Correct!  And the sun light plays havoc with his leg hairs. That must have been before he was put on whatever he's on.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.37  Sean Treacy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.23    5 days ago
y would anyone even give credence to such a stupid accusation? 

Because there is evidence that it occurred. 

tThen let's see them a

Now that's funny. Why don't you ask Biden's pet media that question? 

But Biden....

I don't think you get how that works. The article is about Joe Biden.  I'm not trying to deflect form  Biden, you are by bringing up Trump etc..

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1.38  MrFrost  replied to  MAGA @1.1.4    5 days ago
The Trump Russia connection is a made up lie while the Hillary Russia one and the Biden China connections are quite real and totally true.  

So you are taking the word of trump. How sad. But gotta admit, Hillary sure talked a LOT of trumps people into criminal behavior!!!

Lets recap shall we? 

512

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.39  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.31    5 days ago
The information was blocked because it was Russian based propaganda

PROVE IT!

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.40  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.31    5 days ago

Business insider is a democrat party tool and asset.  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.41  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.31    5 days ago

Right.  Our American hero of 9-11 is a Russian asset?  Not!  How low can some media go?  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.42  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.33    5 days ago

Thanks! jrSmiley_15_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.44  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.35    5 days ago

But Hillary did as a diversion and cover for her e-mail scandal and Obama knew it as President and let it happen 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.45  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.43    5 days ago

All left wing media stories attempting to tarnish other Americans to protect Benedict Biden...

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1.46  MrFrost  replied to  MAGA @1.1.41    5 days ago

Right.  Our American hero of 9-11 is a Russian asset?  Not!  How low can some media go?  

Hey, people thought the Rosenberg's were hero's too. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1.47  XDm9mm  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.43    5 days ago
There are pages and pages of links. We have known this shit since 2016.

Of course there are pages and pages of as you yourself describe as SHIT.  All untrue and baseless.

Thanks for the validation that the left is quite gullible and susceptible to RUSSIAN disinformation tactics.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.48  seeder  MAGA  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1.47    5 days ago

They are even more susceptible to Chinese Communist Party disinformation tactics.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
1.1.49  MrFrost  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.39    5 days ago
PROVE IT!

Prove it wasn't. There is overwhelming evidence, (that I have posted), that it IS Russia based propaganda. It's not the first and only tied between Rudy and Russia. Lev Parnas? That's just one. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.50  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.43    5 days ago

He was a target of disinformation?  It doesn't mean that he became a pawn, otherwise the FBI would have charged him.

And more important it has nothing to do with this story that social media is censoring and the MSM will not cover. Probably because the Hunter Biden emails were fabricated by the same Russian operative who beat up Jussie Smollett, wrote homophobic slurs on Joy Reid’s blog, and hacked Steve Scully/s.

We have corroboration now on the most damaging part of these e-mails - namely that China gave money to Joe Biden through Hunter Biden. You can't seem to touch that?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1.51  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.49    5 days ago
There is overwhelming evidence, (that I have posted), that it IS Russia based propaganda.

Your post does not show that!

You can repeat it over and over, but like the Russia hoax it is a false narrative!

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1.52  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.37    5 days ago

Sean,

I get how this works. I am amused. My Trump comment was nothing more than ironic and you didn't seem to get it. 

I don't think either thing happened. I think that both sides had/ have wishful thinking. I also think that the right is struggling to find and "October Suprise" and when there is none will take a nothing burger and try hard to push that narrative. 

Have fun. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1.53  XDm9mm  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.52    5 days ago
I also think that the right is struggling to find and "October Suprise" and when there is none will take a nothing burger and try hard to push that narrative. 

Fox has corroborated the Hunter shit.  They spoke with other people directly named on the emails.

But you're too much of a Trump hater to know or even believe the truth when presented.

Now....  DELETE MY ACCOUNT....

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1.54  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1.53    5 days ago

I don't hate Trump. I just don't think he should hold the office of the Presidency. I have felt that way about other presidents, too. But you can only think in the binary. Like/hate. 

And I followed your directions, although nothing stopped you from just not showing up here. 

Btw, you were banned, not deleted for your display of disgusting foul language. 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.55  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.46    5 days ago

The ones with the same broad ideology of AOC and Biden-Harris

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.56  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.50    5 days ago

I couldn’t agree more.  Well put and thanks for sharing it.  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.57  seeder  MAGA  replied to  XDm9mm @1.1.53    5 days ago

I wish you hadn’t done or said what you did in reply to the thread.  

 
 
 
bugsy
1.1.58  bugsy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.54    5 days ago
I have felt that way about other presidents, too.

Let me guess...

Reagan

Bush 1

Bush 2

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.59  seeder  MAGA  replied to  bugsy @1.1.58    5 days ago

Nixon, Ford....

 
 
 
bugsy
1.1.60  bugsy  replied to  MAGA @1.1.59    5 days ago

Only if they have an R next to the name.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.61  seeder  MAGA  replied to  bugsy @1.1.60    5 days ago

That is the bottom line...

 
 
 
TᵢG
1.1.62  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @1.1.60    5 days ago

You really should not presume.   I happen to know you are wrong.

 
 
 
TᵢG
1.1.63  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @1.1.61    5 days ago

... and of course you are also wrong.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.64  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @1.1.63    5 days ago

I’m sure that Eisenhower is the exception....

 
 
 
TᵢG
1.1.65  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @1.1.64    5 days ago

More than that.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.66  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.43    4 days ago

Maybe this tidbit will get people to consider the motivations of Facebook in trying to shut down the Biden e mail stories:  

Anna Makanju, Facebook’s Public Policy Manager for Global Elections, was Joe Biden’s senior policy adviser… on Ukraine

Anna Makanju has a history perfectly tailored to help Joe Biden get elected though her current position.

Anna-Makanju-Facebooks-Public-Policy-Manager-for-Global-Elections-was-Joe-Bidens-senior-policy-advis.jpg?resize=750%2C375&ssl=1 The debacle that Big Tech created this week when they decided to censor an article critical of Joe Biden and his son, Hunter , has put a spotlight on people who were otherwise hidden in the shadows. Of particular interest are those who are involved with ensuring “election integrity” at companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google. That’s why it’s no surprise to find out Anna Makanju, Facebook’s Public Policy Manager for Global Elections, has a history that should spark interest.

First and foremost, she was born in the former Soviet Union. That fact alone is not disqualifying; there are many patriotic Americans born in the USSR who are now wonderful citizens. But when we look at the rest of her history, the Soviet connection becomes a bigger issue. Here are some of the other areas of concern, especially when we consider the role she plays at Facebook should be filled by someone who is politically unbiased:

  • Senior Policy Advisor to Ambassador Samantha Power
  • Director for Russia at the National Security Council
  • Chief of Staff for the Office of European and NATO Policy
  • Professor at Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University
  • Field organizer for Obama for America in Wisconsin
  • Worked for the President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
  • Distinguished Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship recipient

She has put together one of the most prolific resumes possible for a radical progressive attorney with credits that would make any budding Democratic-Socialist envious. But in light of the actions by Facebook to quash a series of stories that reveal the unambiguous corruption of the Biden family and the candidate himself, the most glaring part of her resume is that she was the Special Policy Advisor for Europe and Eurasia to Vice President Biden . In other words, she was his senior policy adviser on Ukraine.

And now she’s making decisions about whether a story about Joe Biden and Ukraine should be allowed on the platform......

read more at: https://noqreport.com/2020/10/17/anna-makanju-facebooks-public-policy-manager-for-global-elections-was-joe-bidens-senior-policy-adviser-on-ukraine/

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.67  Tessylo  replied to  MAGA @1.1.3    4 days ago
"I noticed that you had nothing to say about the Biden crime family syndicate and their connections and loyalties to the Communist Party of China." 

Because they're lies.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.68  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.25    4 days ago

It's a nothingberder.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.69  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.26    4 days ago

All you have are Faux 'news' links and Breitbart and Townhall, NOT REPUTABLE SOURCES.  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.70  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.67    4 days ago

Actually it’s the denial of his activities that are the lies here.  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.71  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.69    4 days ago

They most certainly are reputable sources as is the NY Post. 

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.72  gooseisgone  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.38    3 days ago

You forgot to include the Clinton Foundation donations when Hillary was in office vs after she lost her run for President.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.73  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.72    3 days ago

You forgot to include the Trump Foundation donations that Donald used for his own benefit and which got shut down because of fraud. 

Oh and BTFW, the Clinton Foundation is still up and running and helping people all over the world and still has a 3 star rating as a charity. 

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.74  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.73    3 days ago
Clinton Foundation is still up and running

Glad to hear it, has nothing to do with what I asked.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.75  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.74    3 days ago
Glad to hear it, has nothing to do with what I asked.

You didn't 'ask' anything goose, why pretend you did? 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.76  seeder  MAGA  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.74    3 days ago

Typical “but Trump!” TDS derailment attempt.  

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.77  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.75    3 days ago

True..but still has nothing to do with what you posted. Why don’t you supply the financials Dulay since you seem to be up on the foundation. Btw he included the Trump foundation in his post did you miss that. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.79  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.77    2 days ago
Btw he included the Trump foundation in his post did you miss that. 

No. My comment was in reply to YOURS, did you miss that?

You brought up donations, did you not?

I replied about donations, did I not? 

Oh and BTFW, your comment was a deflection from the Trump foundation, not mine. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.80  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @1.1.34    2 days ago

Isn't lying a Cardinal sin?  

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.81  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.35    2 days ago

Where's Durham's 'report' Vic? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.82  Sean Treacy  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.74    2 days ago
linton Foundation is still up and running

And pulling in about 10% of the donations it did when Clinton had access to power and Russian Oligarchs were giving her millions.

Amazing how a "charity's" donations are tied to it's leaders ability to use governmental power to benefit the donors.

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.83  gooseisgone  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.82    2 days ago
Amazing how a "charity's" donations are tied to it's leaders ability to use governmental power

Sean, how could you say such a thing! 

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.84  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.79    2 days ago
I replied about donations, did I not? 

No.....you're asking me something about someone else's post, if you want information about the donations to the Trump Foundation ask MrFrost yourself.

Oh and BTFW, your comment was a deflection from the Trump foundation, not mine. 

I was NEVER talking about Trump until you brought it up, so how can I deflect, explain that. My comment was directed at the Clinton Foundation donations, still is,  if you want to talk about the Trump Foundation start another seed. It's really not that hard, you need to learn to stay on task. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.85  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.82    2 days ago
Amazing how a "charity's" donations are tied to it's leaders ability to use governmental power to benefit the donors.

Even more amazing is that after 5 years of the same bullshit allegations, no prosecutions have happened in connection to the Clinton Foundation while Trump's Charity was forced to liquidate and close and ALL of it's officers prohibited from being on the board of any NY charity into perpetuity because of documented FRAUD. 

Ya Sean, but Hillary...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.86  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dulay @1.1.85    2 days ago
ars of the same bullshit allegations, no pr

Not really. Russian oligarchs and the Clintons, who live on the edge of criminality, know how to avoid leaving the evidence that can secure an indictment.  

That their donations  dried up when Clinton lost access to power isn't a bullshit allegation, it's easily verifiable, which I'm sure you know. 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.87  Dulay  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.84    2 days ago
No.....you're asking me something about someone else's post,

Since you're pretending shit about questions again, how about you post an answer. 

I was NEVER talking about Trump until you brought it up, so how can I deflect, explain that.

YOU replied by deflecting to Clinton and you admitted as much since you said of Mr. Frost's post:

Btw he included the Trump foundation in his post did you miss that.   

So Mr. Frost cited Trump...

My comment was directed at the Clinton Foundation donations, still is, if you want to talk about the Trump Foundation start another seed. 

The YOU defected to Clinton and I brought it back ON TOPIC to Trump. Get it now? 

It's really not that hard, you need to learn to stay on task.

If that's true, why have you proven yourself incapable of doing so? 

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.88  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.86    2 days ago
Not really. Russian oligarchs and the Clintons, who live on the edge of criminality, know how to avoid leaving the evidence that can secure an indictment.

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

That their donations dried up when Clinton lost access to power isn't a bullshit allegation, it's easily verifiable, which I'm sure you know.

Oh please DO post some evidence that Russian oligarchs donated then and stopped donating in 2013. I hope you know I won't be holding my breath waiting for it. Maybe they're listed in the list of 298,248 who gave $250 or less. I know you can't mean Bill and Melinda Gates who gave over 25 million. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
1.1.89  Ronin2  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.82    2 days ago

Wasn't just Russian oligarchs- Sheiks, dictators with insanely bad human rights violations, and despots of every kind had their money "invested" in the Clinton Foundation. Of course that all dried up once Hillary lost her bid to be President. No play, no pay.

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-foundation-donations/

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.90  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.87    yesterday
you're pretending shit about questions, YOU replied by deflecting to Clinton, since you said of Mr. Frost's post, So Mr. Frost cited Trump, I brought it back ON TOPIC to Trump, why have you proven yourself incapable of doing so, Get it now?

What kind of word salad is this shit. I was posting to Frost not you, you want me to respond to you, here's a response [Deleted.]  I'll help you out. see the next post.

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.91  gooseisgone  replied to  Dulay @1.1.87    yesterday

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.92  Texan1211  replied to  gooseisgone @1.1.91    yesterday
removed for context

Perhaps Dulay should open an article for that instead of derailing this one.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.93  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.92    yesterday
Perhaps Dulay should open an article for that instead of derailing this one.

Perhaps some members should think about growing a pair and addressing other members face to face.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.94  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @1.1.93    yesterday
Perhaps some members should think about growing a pair and addressing other members face to face.

When and if I choose to respond to you in the future, you will be able to tell by this:

Next to the post number at the top left, the words "Texan1211 replied to Dulay" will appear. On my screen, our names appear in blue.

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.95  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.94    yesterday

Yet here you are and STILL incapable of addressing the issue you pretend to have. 

You might want to review the thread before accusing me, on the down low, of derailing.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.96  Texan1211  replied to  Dulay @1.1.95    yesterday

jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
1.1.97  Dulay  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.96    yesterday

24

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.98  Tessylo  replied to  Dulay @1.1.97    yesterday

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  MAGA @1    5 days ago

Hunter "The Hustler" Biden is nothing more than the proverbial chip off the old block!

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2    5 days ago

Indeed.  They are equal in their lack of moral values and their corruption. 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.3  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MAGA @1    5 days ago

Reaction to big tech censorship of Hunter Biden story

Judge Jeanine on Big Tech's suppression of the alleged Hunter Biden emails linking him to Ukraine, China

https://www.foxnews.com/shows/justice-jeanine

 
 
 
MAGA
1.4  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MAGA @1    3 days ago
 
 
 
MrFrost
2  MrFrost    5 days ago

In the end, the right is still trying to get me to not vote for for Hunter Biden. Fine...I voted for Joe Biden this morning and for the first time in my life, I vote Democrat all the way down the ballot. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.1  Split Personality  replied to  MrFrost @2    5 days ago

I know, funny I could not find Hunter Biden on any ballots either.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.1.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Split Personality @2.1    5 days ago
I know, funny I could not find Hunter Biden either.

Did you look in daddies basement?  He might be hiding there with him.

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1.1    5 days ago

Did you look in daddies basement?  He might be hiding there with him.

Um, he meant on the ballot to vote for president. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.1.4  XDm9mm  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.2    5 days ago
Um, he meant on the ballot to vote for president. 

[Deleted]

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.5  seeder  MAGA  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1.4    5 days ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.1.6  XDm9mm  replied to  MAGA @2.1.5    5 days ago
That’s indeed how it is here!

[DELETED]

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.7  seeder  MAGA  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1.6    5 days ago

[DELETED]

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.8  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.7    5 days ago

Well here you go MAGA, since you are such a kind good person that you need to see this: 

Yeah... maybe now the cunts that "moderate" and OWN this click bait bullshit site will delete my fucking account from this shithole.

THATS A HINT CUNT!!~!!!!!!~!

Oh, by the way... EAT SHIT SANDY. It's what you're good for.

Banned for repeated hateful, disgusting, and disrespectful comments. 

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.9  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.8    5 days ago

It’s sad that his frustration level built up to the point that he felt the need to vent like that.  I’m going to miss him.  That said, I would not have expressed myself like that nor vented my feelings in that manner.  The effects of Covid and it’s lockdowns and corresponding losses of freedom along with the pressures of what amounts to an all or nothing result for our beliefs and ideals for the losing side of the election campaign can build in some to a boiling point.  I’m sorry to everyone involved here that this happened and thus the intent of thread  4

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.10  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.9    5 days ago

This reads remarkably like a defense of his behavior.  A poor one, but a defense, all the same.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.11  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.9    5 days ago
 The effects of Covid and it’s lockdowns and corresponding losses of freedom along with the pressures of what amounts to an all or nothing result for our beliefs and ideals for the losing side of the election campaign can build in some to a boiling point.

We are all under the same pressure and I am sorry, but I would never talk to a person like that and I truly believe that most here would not either. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.12  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @2.1.9    5 days ago
corresponding losses of freedom

What losses of freedom? 

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.13  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.10    5 days ago

It wasn’t but to each there own.  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.14  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.12    5 days ago

Face diapers and mandatory lockdowns and school closures not to mention the bigotry against religion while allowing mobs to roam our cities...

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.15  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @2.1.14    5 days ago
Face diapers

What are "face diapers?"

and mandatory lockdowns and school closures

That's a means to contain contagion spread. But how does locking down remove any freedom?

not to mention the bigotry against religion while allowing mobs to roam our cities...

 Since you so often make the claim of bigotry against religion or seem to think everything is bigoted against religion, your statement is utterly meaningless. But I doubt your religion has been affected in any way.

 
 
 
Kavika
2.1.16  Kavika   replied to  MAGA @2.1.9    5 days ago

96005015_3564751740206572_4190011188777582592_o.jpg?_nc_cat=111&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=Ol-op_lY-wwAX_uwrhn&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-1.xx&tp=7&oh=a43dc3504f477f748d994f7a9109bfe5&oe=5FAF6B8A

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.17  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.14    5 days ago

We are in a pandemic. People are dying about 1,000 a day. Fellow Americans. And you are complaining about masks, and kids going to school remotely until a vaccine is made? And what religious bigotry. Are you not free to pray to god? Don't you have a personal relationship with him? I can attend any faith's services by just turning on the TV. Can't you?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.18  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.17    5 days ago

They are brainwashed . 

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.1.19  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @2.1.9    5 days ago
It’s sad that his frustration level built up to the point that he felt the need to vent like that.  I’m going to miss him.

It's like the 7th time he said it in public and in PN and in chat to several MODs.

It's unacceptable and most unchristlike.

I'll miss him like I miss shingles, lol.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.20  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.17    5 days ago

Cardinal Blase Cupich, the archbishop of the Chicago archdiocese, celebrates Mass every Sunday at Holy Name Cathedral , the point being it is on television, on the local ABC station, channel 7. 

They have this tv mass even though the churches are open for limited attendance. 

There are religious services all over the place on You Tube and streaming. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.21  Gordy327  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.18    5 days ago
They are brainwashed . 

That's hilarious coming from you! And I see you dodged the questions-yet again!

 
 
 
devangelical
2.1.22  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.19    5 days ago

... and another 2+ weeks for even more desperate bombshells to detonate. hilarious.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.23  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.15    5 days ago

Even the WHO is against lockdowns now based on what we now know.  There is no legitimate reason or any science in support of lockdowns.  They are all about control now.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.24  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @2.1.23    5 days ago
Even the WHO is against lockdowns now based on what we now know.  There is no legitimate reason or any science in support of lockdowns.  

Lockdowns have been largely lifted. Many states only have partial lockdowns (i.e. reduced capacity in public places) to prevent further spread. Lockdowns are to prevent the spread of contagion.

They are all about control now

Still more nonsense. And yo still haven't answered the questions. 

As long as blue leaders say a cause is more important than the disease and they sanction their allies actions while condemning smaller groups meeting who aren’t their allies,

Preventing the spread of disease and protecting peoples health and possibly their lives seems like a good cause to me.

we on the right will ignore everything they have to say.  

That says a lot about what kind of people the right really is then.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.25  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.17    5 days ago

Then the looters and rioters and the like can do likewise.  As long as blue leaders say a cause is more important than the disease and they sanction their allies actions while condemning smaller groups meeting who aren’t their allies, we on the right will ignore everything they have to say.  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.26  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.17    5 days ago

I can and I have.  That’s not the point though nor is it for non religious people to have any say or power over at all of any kind.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.27  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.23    5 days ago

No, the WHO Didn’t Change Its Lockdown Stance or ‘Admit’ Trump Was Right

But did the WHO change its stance on lockdowns or concede anything to Trump, as he said it did? Briefly, no.

Yet those lockdowns — marked by stay-at-home orders and other restrictions — have been less stringent than those implemented in other countries, said   Brooke Nichols , an assistant professor of global health at Boston University.

The “definition has differed country by country and state by state. I would argue that the U.S. has never had an actual enforced lockdown like there have been in some Asian countries and in Italy last spring,” Nichols wrote in an email.

...

A member of the WHO media office told us in a statement, “Our position on lockdowns and other severe movement restrictions has been consistent since the beginning. We recognize that they are costly to societies, economies and individuals, but may need to be used if COVID-19 transmission is out of control.”
 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.28  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.20    5 days ago

My church is open for limited attendance until next week and it’s on Facebook live as well.  Whether it goes outdoors or strictly Facebook then I don’t know.  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.29  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.24    5 days ago

Shouldn’t the so called peaceful protestors, rioters, looters, and arsonist Biden supporters prevented the spread of disease and protect public health by staying home all summer and fall?  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.30  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.27    5 days ago

Then they will need the same kind of force to re lock it down that China exerts in order to get its people to bend over to their will.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.31  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.25    5 days ago
Then the looters and rioters and the like can do likewise.

Who said no, especially since looting and rioting is against the law.

As long as blue leaders say a cause is more important than the disease and they sanction their allies actions while condemning smaller groups meeting who aren’t their allies

No blue leader has sanctioned looters and rioters.

while condemning smaller groups meeting who aren’t their allies,

What are you talking about?

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.32  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.26    5 days ago
I can and I have.  That’s not the point though nor is it for non religious people to have any say or power over at all of any kind.  

No that is the very point. You are saying that people are being stopped from worshipping and yet they are not. And everyone has a say in a democracy. Are you not trying to dictate what a woman does with her body? I could say the same thing.

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.33  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @2.1.29    5 days ago
Shouldn’t the so called peaceful protestors, rioters, looters, and arsonist Biden supporters prevented the spread of disease and protect public health by staying home all summer and fall?  

If they're rioters and looters, they're hardly peaceful. And that is still against the law. It doesn't help matters when protesters are egged on by politicians too. Everyone should band together as a nation and stay home whenever possible. But some people are clearly too inconsiderate, selfish, or ignorant to do so.

Still waiting for you to answer the questions posed. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.34  Gordy327  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.27    5 days ago

What? You mean the statement about the WHO being against lockdowns was a lie? >Gasp< I'm shocked. Shocked I tells you, lol

 
 
 
TᵢG
2.1.36  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @2.1.14    5 days ago
Face diapers and mandatory lockdowns and school closures not to mention the bigotry against religion while allowing mobs to roam our cities...

We are in the middle of a pandemic and we have individuals whining instead of helping get through this.   The use of terms like 'face diaper' reveals you do not comprehend the importance of wearing a mask.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.37  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.30    5 days ago

You mean we can't rely on some folks to keep their germs to themselves for humanitarian reasons?

Noted.

You know, even the Hebrews of the Old Testament had quarantine laws regarding contagious diseases - think leprosy.

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.38  Gordy327  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.36    5 days ago
We are in the middle of a pandemic and we have individuals whining instead of helping get through this.   The use of terms like 'face diaper' reveals you do not comprehend the importance of wearing a mask.

It doesn't help that certain politicians only promote such behavior. Or that such individuals are not very smart or considerate.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.39  sandy-2021492  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.34    5 days ago

Who woulda thunk it, right?

 
 
 
TᵢG
2.1.40  TᵢG  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.38    5 days ago

Would not be a problem if people did not sycophantically believe what these politicians proclaim.

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.41  Gordy327  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.40    5 days ago
Would not be a problem if people did not sycophantically believe what these politicians proclaim.

Like I said, some people are not very smart or considerate. Unfortunately, nowadays that seems to be the norm rather than the exception.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.42  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.36    5 days ago

His commentary is entirely Fox News or other right wing media talking points. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
2.1.43  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.42    5 days ago

Copy & paste, sycophantic parroting.   The polar opposite of critical analysis.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.44  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.31    5 days ago

Blue city and states sanctioned mass peaceful protests for BLM than some of their elements and Antifa turned into the other, yet they didn’t restrict large gatherings of those “peaceful” protesters even after they led to the other things happening and yet they were quick to be critical of pro back the blue events, re open the economy events, outdoor religious events, and pro Trump events.  It’s hypocrisy pure and simple.  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.45  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.32    5 days ago

We don’t have a democracy.  We have a constitutional republic and a constitution that is designed to ready excessive majoritarian impulses.  Part of that is preventing two secular wolves from dictating what’s for lunch to the Christian or ultra orthodox Jewish lambs.  Besides many of these blue city mayors and state governors are using emergency powers to often thwart the will of the people’s elected legislative bodies.  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.46  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.34    5 days ago

It’s not a lie.  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.47  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.42    5 days ago

Msm sucks!  I use real and objective reliable news sources.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.48  JohnRussell  replied to  MAGA @2.1.47    5 days ago
I use real and objective reliable news sources.  

Are you related to Baghdad Bob ?

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.49  JBB  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.48    5 days ago

More like Tokyo Rose and Baghdad Bob mated...

 
 
 
TᵢG
2.1.50  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @2.1.45    5 days ago
We don’t have a democracy.  We have a constitutional republic

Ours is a federated constitutional Republic operating on representative democracy.

Our Republic is a democracy.   The two are not necessarily at odds.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.51  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @2.1.47    5 days ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.52  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @2.1.46    5 days ago
It’s not a lie.

Looks like Sandy proved you wrong! 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.53  sandy-2021492  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1.52    5 days ago

I think it took me all of 10 seconds on Google.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.54  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.45    5 days ago
Part of that is preventing two secular wolves from dictating what’s for lunch to the Christian or ultra orthodox Jewish lambs.

What are you talking about? Do you even know? Most Christians and Jews are going on with the mandates willingly. The Haredi think they are above the law and they are not. And frankly, the only complaint that the orthodox community had, was that Cuomo first called the Haredi "the orthodox community" which offended the true "Orthodox community" of which the Haredi don't even consider themselves part of and the rest of the proper Orthodox community doesn't want to be labeled along with the Heredia sects Neturei Karta and the Satmar. You feel sorry for them? Well, if you are waiting for the second coming they are not your people. They don't believe that Israel should exist till the coming of the Messiah. So every messianic Christian is out of luck with them.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.55  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.53    5 days ago

The World Health Organization has warned leaders against relying on COVID-19 lockdowns to tackle outbreaks — after previously saying countries should be careful how quickly they reopen.

WHO envoy Dr. David Nabarro said such restrictive measures should only be treated as a last resort, the British magazine the Spectator reported in a video interview.

“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Nabarro said.

“The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”

Nabarro said tight restrictions cause significant harm, particularly on the global economy.

“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never, ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer,” he said.

He added that lockdowns have severely impacted countries that rely on tourism.

“Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry in the Caribbean, for example, or in the Pacific because people aren’t taking their holidays,” Nabarro told the outlet.

“Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world. Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition.”

The UN agency previously warned countries against lifting lockdowns too soon during the first wave of the virus.

“The last thing any country needs is to open schools and businesses, only to be forced to close them again because of a resurgence,” said Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

But Tedros had urged countries to bolster other measures, including widespread testing and contact tracing, so they could safely reopen and avoid future lockdowns.

“We need to reach a sustainable situation where we have adequate control of this virus without shutting down our lives entirely, or lurching from lockdown to lockdown — which has a hugely detrimental impact on societies,” he said.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2020/10/11/who-warns-against-covid-19-lockdowns-due-to-economic-damage/amp/

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.56  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.54    5 days ago

Just because religious beliefs might be incompatible doesn’t mean I wouldn’t support their constitutional right to meet in person for their religious events or the right of any other religious group.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.57  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.56    5 days ago

They can meet like all other reasonable faiths have been meeting. With masks on and socially distant, or on TV or computer. But they don't want to do that, in the middle of a disease that they think God will save them from. Not working so far. They are dropping like flies while making others in their neighborhoods sick along with them. 

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.58  seeder  MAGA  replied to  XDm9mm @2.1.1    5 days ago

And doing it with his deceased brothers widow while there...

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.59  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.48    5 days ago

No. That’s the fascists that run Twitter and Facebook 

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.60  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.57    5 days ago

You realize that there are blue city mayors and blue state governors prohibiting indoor religious services even with temperature checks, hand washing, social distancing, and mask wearing? 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.61  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.55    4 days ago
“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary (bolding mine) means of control of this virus,” Nabarro said. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”

You seem to read this as an unequivocal disavowal of lockdowns.  It is not.  The word "primary" is key here, and the conditions mentioned as justifying lockdowns have been met in many countries (think Italy) and cities (think NYC).

But Tedros had urged countries to bolster other measures, including widespread testing and contact tracing, so they could safely reopen and avoid future lockdowns.

And how have we done with these measures?

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.62  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.50    4 days ago

The federalism and the constitution and its protections of individual rights and the bill of rights along with the original senate and the electoral college were all put in place to protect against excesses in majoritarian rule and to provide checks on the heated and passioned enflamed actions of a national majority.  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.63  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.61    4 days ago

I never said that they disavowed the original lockdowns too many nations resorted to in the beginning of Chinas virus.  And yes we need to avoid any and all future lockdowns.  Period and it won’t matter because the more some try to impose them again the more they will be defied.  The nations in Europe that locked down the longest and most severely are now having cases much higher per capita right now than the USA or Sweden are right now.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
2.1.64  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @2.1.62    4 days ago

You wrote this:

MAGA @2.1.45We don’t have a democracy.  We have a constitutional republic and a constitution that is designed to ready excessive majoritarian impulses.

I replied with this:

TiG @2.1.50 ☞ Ours is a federated constitutional Republic operating on representative democracy.  Our Republic is a democracy.   The two are not necessarily at odds.

You then reply with this non sequitur??:

MAGA @2.1.62 ☞ The federalism and the constitution and its protections of individual rights and the bill of rights along with the original senate and the electoral college were all put in place to protect against excesses in majoritarian rule and to provide checks on the heated and passioned enflamed actions of a national majority.

Yeah, none of that is in dispute (at least not in general;  not going to nit-pick).

Getting back to the actual question on the table:   do you or do you not comprehend that ours is a federated Republic operating on representative Democracy?

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.65  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.64    4 days ago

No kidding.  I had no idea at all before you came along.  /s Quit being so darned condescending.  We all know that at the local, state, and federal House of Representatives our constitutional republic has an elected representative democracy within the bounds of what the constitution allows and that the constitution was later (wrongly in my opinion) amended to make the federal senate that way as well.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.66  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MAGA @2.1.60    4 days ago

No they are not. What they are limiting is the number of people in enclosed buildings. Almost every house of worship is open here in NY. You really have to stop reading Town Hall, because what it is saying is just not true. 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.67  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.63    4 days ago

You said they oppose lockdowns, period. These are your words:

There is no legitimate reason or any science in support of lockdowns.

This is not true.  You have misrepresented the WHO position on lockdowns, and portrayed it as more black and white than it actually is.

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.68  Tessylo  replied to  MAGA @2.1.9    4 days ago

"It’s sad that his frustration level built up to the point that he felt the need to vent like that.  I’m going to miss him.  That said, I would not have expressed myself like that nor vented my feelings in that manner.  The effects of Covid and it’s lockdowns and corresponding losses of freedom along with the pressures of what amounts to an all or nothing result for our beliefs and ideals for the losing side of the election campaign can build in some to a boiling point.  I’m sorry to everyone involved here that this happened and thus the intent of thread  4"

Wow blaming everyone but the one responsible for their own behavior, himself.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.69  Tessylo  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.8    4 days ago
"Well here you go MAGA, since you are such a kind good person that you need to see this:"

"Yeah... maybe now the cunts that "moderate" and OWN this click bait bullshit site will delete my fucking account from this shithole. THATS A HINT CUNT!!~!!!!!!~! Oh, by the way... EAT SHIT SANDY. It's what you're good for.

Banned for repeated hateful, disgusting, and disrespectful comments."

That's a lot of venom and hate and ignorance.

Yet they call us libs/progressives/dems full of hate.

Go figure!

 
 
 
TᵢG
2.1.70  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @2.1.65    4 days ago
No kidding.  I had no idea at all before you came along.  /s

The sarcasm connotation is not true given you stated:

MAGA @ 2.1.45 ☞ We don’t have a democracy .

This does not correlate with this:  

MAGA @ 2.1.65 ☞ We all know that at the local, state, and federal House of Representatives our constitutional republic has an elected representative democracy within the bounds of what the constitution allows and that the constitution was later (wrongly in my opinion) amended to make the federal senate that way as well.  

Per you, we do not have a democracy but then we do.  

You made a false claim and were corrected.   Now you wish to state that you never made the claim.   That is impossible, the claim is right there.

You can always qualify your comments by explaining in more detail what you meant.   For example, you could have said that by 'democracy' you are referring to 'direct democracy'.   Or you could have said that we do not have a simple democracy ... that ours is a more complex system.   

But you chose to obfuscate and got an appropriate reply to that tactic.

 
 
 
Ender
2.1.71  Ender  replied to  MAGA @2.1.14    4 days ago

 
 
 
TᵢG
2.1.72  TᵢG  replied to  Ender @2.1.71    4 days ago

Outstanding!   Loved Mrs. Potts.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.73  sandy-2021492  replied to  Ender @2.1.71    4 days ago

Still chuckling.

 
 
 
Dulay
2.1.74  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @2.1.63    4 days ago
The nations in Europe that locked down the longest and most severely are now having cases much higher per capita right now than the USA or Sweden are right now.  

Yet those nations actually came out of their first wave, the US hasn't. 

Since you and yours are all about America FIRST, how about you compare the STATES that had true lockdowns and those that didn't. The STATES with the top 10 highest per capita rate are ND, LA, MS, SD, FL, AL, IA, TN, AR and GA. Some of those states STILL haven't had ANY form of lockdown and the others gave it lip service. Chickens come home to roost.  

 
 
 
Veronica
2.1.75  Veronica  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.8    4 days ago

Wow.  Go back to work full time (less time here) and I miss a whole bunch of stuff.  I am sorry the two of you were exposed to such venom.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.76  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.66    4 days ago

Then why do churches in enclosed buildings get fewer people allowed in than any other enclosed building used for any other purpose?  And yes there are places that allow people to go indoors for any purpose except religious services.  We (Organizations I’m sympathetic to or affiliated with) are still fighting some of them in court now.   

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.77  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.67    4 days ago

It’s good enough to be used as a basis to resist any attempt at a future national lockdown attempted by a Biden regime.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.78  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.77    4 days ago

Petulant resistance based on a dishonest interpretation, endangering your fellow human beings.  Sounds so Christlike.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.79  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.70    4 days ago

Oh whatever!  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.80  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.78    4 days ago

The science shows that far more harm up to and including death comes from the lockdown than the disease.  Lockdowns are a cure worse than the disease but there’s actually two other seeds on that issue here.  This one is about the corrupt Biden crime family syndicate and their dealings with foreign particularly Chinese influence.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.81  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.80    4 days ago

Again, it's not as black and white as that, and your own links don't support that claim.  You have to ignore key words and even whole paragraphs in your own links to convince yourself that they do, and ignore when that's pointed out, then deflect with unsupported insults about the Bidens.  It's a very transparent tactic, and a bit pathetic.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.82  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.79    4 days ago

Brilliant response jrSmiley_84_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.83  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @2.1.80    4 days ago

What science? Cite your sources!

 
 
 
Gordy327
2.1.84  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @2.1.79    4 days ago

The typical dismissive response when one has no valid rebuttal.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.85  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @2.1.81    4 days ago

What was the title and topic of this seeded article?  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
2.1.86  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @2.1.85    4 days ago

I'm responding to YOUR comments.  If you'd like to stick to the seeded topic, start at home.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2  XDm9mm  replied to  MrFrost @2    5 days ago
Fine...I voted for Joe Biden this morning and for the first time in my life, I vote Democrat all the way down the ballot. 

Damn.  Here I thought you were a gun owner.  Now you're obviously willing to surrender those guns to whoever Hiden Biden or suck-ass Beto assigns to the task.

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.2.1  MrFrost  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2    5 days ago

Damn.  Here I thought you were a gun owner.  Now you're obviously willing to surrender those guns to whoever Hiden Biden or suck-ass Beto assigns to the task.

Yea yea, "They will take your guns!!!!"

Repubs have been screeching the same lie for every Democrat presidential candidate since Carter. Never has happened and absolutely no legislation has ever been up for a vote to abolish the 2nd amendment. Same lie, different candidate...

 
 
 
MAGA
2.2.2  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @2.2.1    5 days ago

None previously has talked of doing away completely with the filibuster or openly speculated about court packing either.  All prior norms are out the window if the criminal Biden gang was elected.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.3  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @2.2.2    5 days ago

Wake up and smell the coffeve..

All political norms have been dashed on a daily basis since 01/20/2017.

The Trump crime family is the epitome of pay to play, always has been.

SMH

 
 
 
MAGA
2.2.4  seeder  MAGA  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2    5 days ago

The Trump family are great Americans and Trump is a great American President!  

 
 
 
MAGA
2.3  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @2    5 days ago

Joe enriched himself personally through Hunters connections using his elected office.  A great basis for a democrat party line vote!  

 
 
 
MrFrost
2.3.1  MrFrost  replied to  MAGA @2.3    5 days ago

Joe enriched himself personally through Hunters connections using his elected office.  A great basis for a democrat party line vote!  

Proof? None. How shocking. 

 
 
 
MAGA
2.3.2  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MrFrost @2.3.1    5 days ago

Breitbart, the New York Post, Fox News have all the evidence any rational objective observer would need to see that it is true.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.3.3  JohnRussell  replied to  MAGA @2.3    5 days ago

giuliani-dracula-meme.jpg

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.3.4  Tessylo  replied to  MAGA @2.3.2    4 days ago
"Breitbart, the New York Post, Fox News have all the evidence any rational objective observer would need to see that it is true."

None of which are valid/reputable sources, NONE!

 
 
 
Dulay
2.3.5  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @2.3.2    4 days ago

So your claim that you cite reliable sources was BS. Thanks for proving what I already knew. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
3  Split Personality    5 days ago

Chinese delegations have visited the WH innumerable times and they are all documented.

State visits are easier to verify.

https://www.whitehousehistory.org/history-of-chinese-state-visits-to-the-white-house

When Ivanka visits China to apply for patents which are granted in record time, who complains?

The desperation in these stories is laughable.

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Split Personality @3    5 days ago

Which side is desperately trying to censor, hide, repress these stories about Biden and his pay to play influence and enrichment schemes? 

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @3.1    5 days ago

Have you seen Joe Bidens tax returns?  I have. He must be terrible at the collecting on these connections, lol.

The conservatives who tend to be Republicans, bring these stories and charges of "pay to play" out against Democrats

like the Clintons and Bidens, childishly calling them "crime syndicate families"  while ignoring the

the most nepotistic Administration ever to occupy the WH and Ivanka's wheeling and dealing for patents and favorable

contracts making products in typical Chinese sweat shops. She enriches the Trump family.

At least the Trump entities that haven't been sued out of existence yet.

The irony is palpable.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.1    5 days ago
He must be terrible at the collecting on these connections, lol.

It is typical of China to pay a family member so as to conceal the transaction.

"10 for the big guy" means to me that Joe got paid in cash. We don't have a lot of time to get at the truth and I no longer have much faith in the system that we ever will.

Have a good one.

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.2    5 days ago

Then how much do you think Donald and Ivanka have collected in cash?

It's ridiculous to assume these things only happen to one candidate or party.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.3    5 days ago
Then how much do you think Donald and Ivanka have collected in cash?

Why don't you post an article about that and discuss it there?

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.5  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.4    5 days ago

Good point!  Great idea!

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.6  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.3    5 days ago

image-7-390x220.png

A.F. Branco October 16, 2020
0

What’s in a Name? – A.F. Branco Cartoon

See more Branco toons HERE

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.8  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @3.1.7    5 days ago
Well, my understanding is that you have no kids of your own, so your meme is as meaningless to me as it is untrue.
Quick Facts on Drug Addiction
  • According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 19.7 million American adults (aged 12 and older) battled a substance use disorder in 2017 . 1
  • Almost 74% of adults suffering from a substance use disorder in 2017 struggled with an alcohol use disorder. 1
  • About 38% of adults in 2017 battled an illicit drug use disorder. 1
  • That same year, 1 out of every 8 adults struggled with both alcohol and drug use disorders simultaneously. 1
  • In 2017, 8.5 million American adults suffered from both a mental health disorder and a substance use disorder, or co-occurring disorders . 1
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/rehab-guide/addiction-statistics

About 74% of Americans drink beer, wine or liquor daily while not considering themselves to be addicted.

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.9  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.8    5 days ago

Was that a defense of Biden’s child?  

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.10  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.8    5 days ago

Really?  You do realize that by adopting a child it makes them legally every bit my child as if they were my flesh and blood.  I’ve spent my entire adult life career working with and putting kids first.  I worked with at risk emotionally disturbed children and teens in a residential setting and then a non public school setting for over 30 years helping them overcome abuse be it abandonment, neglect, physical, verbal, sexual, access to illicit mind altering substances, you name it.  I have played a role in helping a lot of kids reach a productive adulthood and even a salvaged remainder of childhood.  In my last years there and my current main job I work with special needs young people in person in a special ed program and as a substitute after school staff for an elementary after school program. I have also foster parented short term kids I couldn’t adopt and plan to adopt again.  So please don’t try to tell me I can’t be a compassionate caring, loving person who cares about what happens to kids in this world or my own.

 
 
 
Ender
3.1.11  Ender  replied to  MAGA @3.1.10    5 days ago

Do you think a gay couple should be able to adopt?

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.12  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @3.1.10    5 days ago

This is a reply that I learned from you and yours:

Triggered? 

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.13  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @3.1.10    5 days ago
You do realize that by adopting a child it makes them legally every bit my child as if they were my flesh and blood.

Admirable but still not the same as being a biological parent of your own for their entire lives, sorry, "It is what it is".

I’ve spent my entire adult life career working with and putting kids first

Great, I divided mine between supporting the military and working dozens of jobs.

So please don’t try to tell me I can’t be a compassionate caring, loving person who cares about what happens to kids in this world or my own

I did not say that, but I will say that having your own kids is different. 

Far better and far worse.

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.14  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @3.1.9    5 days ago
Was that a defense of Biden’s child?

No, a defense of everyone who has had a child or children or spouse with substance abuse issues, short or long term,

because shit happens

and your God is useless against it.

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.15  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Ender @3.1.11    5 days ago

Yes I do as long as they do so through a county agency or via a charity group that also agrees with that.  I draw the line at compelling faith based charitable groups that do adoptions and foster placements being compelled to do those placements over their religious beliefs objections. 

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.16  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Dulay @3.1.12    5 days ago

No.  Just frustrated at seeming to be made like a 2nd class parent because I adopted.  

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.17  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.14    5 days ago

No, he isn’t if people so affected actually listened to Him and followed His Council.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
3.1.18  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.2    4 days ago
"10 for the big guy" means to me that Joe got paid in cash.

That is pure conjecture without a lick of evidence backing that false claim up.

We don't have a lot of time to get at the truth

I see, so that's why you resort to lies and baseless opinion.

I no longer have much faith in the system that we ever will.

Well that explains why you'd support such a vile political arsonist like Trump who has spent his time burning political norms and institutions down. Putin has no doubt convinced many conservative Americans that our establishment sucks and we'd be better off without it which is no doubt why he supports Trump, his obvious intent is to destroy western democracy that was so successful in taking down the soviet union. It's just sad that so many disgruntled and gullible conservatives would buy into his false narrative and allow themselves to be used as witless tools of America's greatest most dangerous enemy.

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.19  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @3.1.15    4 days ago
I draw the line at compelling faith based charitable groups that do adoptions and foster placements being compelled to do those placements over their religious beliefs objections. 

I draw the line at having MY tax dollars used to fund an organization that insists that they have the right to discriminate based their religious animus. 

I find it hypocritical that you claim to be an advocate for at risk children yet insist that religious animus should control whether they are placed in a loving home. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.20  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @3.1.16    4 days ago
No.  Just frustrated at seeming to be made like a 2nd class parent because I adopted.  

Yet you've made it clear that you lack the empathy to recognize that LGBTQ people feel that same frustration in more than just adoption and fostering. In fact you support that treatment. 

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.21  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Dulay @3.1.19    4 days ago

Why misrepresent what I said?  I said I have no problem at all with gay unions or single parents or unmarried heterosexual couples adopting kids.  I find those arrangements preferable for the child to an orphanage or institutions or permanent foster care. That said there are plenty of government and private organizations from which to do that.  There is no reason to go to say catholic social services and demand that they make such a placement when you know darn well that their religious beliefs don’t allow that.  Last I checked, neither your nor my tax dollars are funding that that aspect of Catholic social services.  The only animus here is from those who would compel a Christian charity to act against the religious beliefs of their denomination.  

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.22  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @3.1.21    4 days ago
Why misrepresent what I said?

Why pretend that I did. You go on to prove I didn't. 

That said there are plenty of government and private organizations from which to do that.  

Exactly, so WHY fund NGOs that discriminate based on religious animus? 

There is no reason to go to say catholic social services and demand that they make such a placement when you know darn well that their religious beliefs don’t allow that.  Last I checked, neither your nor my tax dollars are funding that that aspect of Catholic social services.  

Then you're not looking very hard, in fact, I suggest that you're intentionally ignoring facts. Catholic Charities closed down their adoption and foster care programs all over the country because states codified anti-discrimination legislation and their funding dried up. 

The only animus here is from those who would compel a Christian charity to act against the religious beliefs of their denomination.  

So your posit is that Christians should be able to share their federally funded 'charitable' acts based on whether those who they allege to serve are their kind of Christians? How unchristian. 

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.23  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Dulay @3.1.22    4 days ago

Catholic social services closed in some cities and states where the law compelled them to violate their religious beliefs.  They chose to close down and cease offering public services rather than agree to operate while violating their beliefs.  I see the day coming where all evangelical Christians schools, hospitals, and other charitable services will simply close and cease operations rather than continue in operation while going against closely held religious beliefs.  Public schools and hospitals will have a sudden unexpected load to carry and government And secularists will have to become a replacement charitable services provider.  We will not both operate our services and violate our religious beliefs.  We either operate our charities on our terms or close them altogether without providing alternative services if we can’t because of secular government mandates or decrees

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.24  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Dulay @3.1.22    4 days ago

I know my church doesn’t take government funding for any of our social and charitable services so we don’t have to obey them to get federal or state funds.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.25  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @3.1.16    4 days ago

Get over it, biological fathers are second class to biological mothers and every one else comes in behind them.

"It is what it is"

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.26  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @3.1.23    4 days ago
 I see the day coming where all evangelical Christians schools, hospitals, and other charitable services will simply close and cease operations rather than continue in operation while going against closely held religious beliefs.

I doubt it Xx. In the first place,  the vast majority of Christian schools and hospitals are NOT charities. 

For example, the Franciscans make millions here in the midwest. They've been discriminating against women and the LGBTQ community FOREVER. 

In the day they and other 'Christian' hospitals all over the country used to just put a woman who had a botched abortion in the hall and let her bleed to death. My mother in law witnessed this fact more times than she cared to count when she trained as a nurse in the west in the 50's and worked in the midwest in the 60's. Her co-workers told her horror stories from all corners of 'Christian' America. 

So you see, Christian hospitals are selective in which 'closely held religious beliefs' they choose to follow. 

BTW, I note that you are no longer denying that Catholic Charities takes federal funding. 

 
 
 
Dulay
3.1.27  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @3.1.24    4 days ago

Actually Xx, they sure as hell have to 'obey' the state non-discrimination regulations on charitable services if they want funding and CA's are some of the most progressive on the country. 

If they take NO funding at all, their charitable services are very limited. 

 
 
 
MAGA
4  seeder  MAGA    5 days ago

Hello everyone.  Since this seed is a key topic of conversation and I have no flagging abilities, you are all on God’s honor and your conscience here to be civil and avoid slap fights on this seed.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
4.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @4    5 days ago

This comes across as a bit insincere, considering that you were egging XDM on above, when he called me and Perrie cunts and told me to eat shit.  Is that what Jesus would have done?

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.1    5 days ago

I didn’t ask for your editorial commentary in the first place and I simply expressed regret at missing what Vic deleted.  You mean he directed something at the left in general that you took personally?  You hadn’t previously commented here so it couldn’t possibly have been directed at you. Had he actually named you two personally and literally told you that he’d have gotten a full Coc not a skirt.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
4.1.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @4.1.1    5 days ago

When I adjusted the ticket so as to award the points he deserved, I inadvertently changed it to a Skirt instead of a full CoC.  Perrie copied and pasted his comment here @2.1.8, since you didn't bother to read what you'd upvoted.  But in case scrolling up is too much effort, here's what you supported:

Yeah... maybe now the cunts that "moderate" and OWN this click bait bullshit site will delete my fucking account from this shithole.

THATS A HINT CUNT!!~!!!!!!~!

Oh, by the way... EAT SHIT SANDY. It's what you're good for.
 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  MAGA @4.1.1    5 days ago
You mean he directed something at the left in general that you took personally?
-
Yeah... maybe now the cunts that "moderate" and OWN this click bait bullshit site will delete my fucking account from this shithole. THATS A HINT CUNT!!~!!!!!!~! Oh, by the way... EAT SHIT SANDY. It's what you're good for.

Sounds pretty personal to me. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
4.1.4  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.1.2    5 days ago

And may I add, he sent me this in chat:

FUCK YOU CUNT!!! EAT CSHIT AND DIE

Now that quality human being/ sarc, has been banned from this site. A rare happening here, may I also note. 

Do you have anything else to share with us MAGA?

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
4.1.5  sandy-2021492  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @4.1.4    5 days ago

I will add that his last suspension was for calling me a cunt on chat and telling me to eat shit.

And some people are sorry to see him go (see MAGA's post @2.1.9).

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.6  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @4.1.2    5 days ago

I can only respond to one post at a time so read 2.1.9 and apply it here.  I sincerely hope that you take his over the top response to you and consider the unspoken Unwritten thought and feelings of many conservative members here 

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.7  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @4.1.4    5 days ago

Only that we should get the seed back on track as per my intent in post #4.  See 2.1.9

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
4.1.8  sandy-2021492  replied to  MAGA @4.1.6    5 days ago

Liberals and independents have every bit as much at stake in this election as conservatives do, and I expect civility from both sides.  This was not the first time I've been attacked by him, and I have never attacked in return.  I believe conservatives are the ones always touting personal accountability.  Why does that seem to go out the window when one of your own misbehaves?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  MAGA @4.1.6    5 days ago
I can only respond to one post at a time so read 2.1.9 and apply it here.  I sincerely hope that you take his over the top response to you and consider the unspoken Unwritten thought and feelings of many conservative members here 

What the hell does that mean?  It sounds like you are saying that other conservatives here think the same thing about these two ladies that XDM said out loud. 

You embarrass yourself enough. Just let it go and move on. 

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.10  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.9    5 days ago

Not what I said so go ahead and move on.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.1.11  JohnRussell  replied to  MAGA @4.1.10    5 days ago
 I sincerely hope that you take his over the top response to you and consider the unspoken Unwritten thought and feelings of many conservative members here 

Ok, explain that then. 

 
 
 
devangelical
4.1.12  devangelical  replied to  MAGA @4.1.6    5 days ago
I sincerely hope that you take his over the top response to you and consider the unspoken Unwritten thought and feelings of many conservative members here

bfd, like you speak for those members. some thoughts and feelings get less and less relevant with each passing day, and there's not many days left.

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.13  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.11    5 days ago

It would be meta to go further so no.  

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.14  seeder  MAGA  replied to  devangelical @4.1.12    5 days ago

Do you seriously think that if your side won all political power at the national level that we would simply go away or become quiet?  Our opposition and resistance will be quite relevant in that event.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.15  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.14    5 days ago
Our opposition and resistance will be quite relevant in that event.  

Sounds a little seditious.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
4.1.16  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  MAGA @4.1.6    5 days ago
I can only respond to one post at a time so read 2.1.9 and apply it here.  I sincerely hope that you take his over the top response to you and consider the unspoken Unwritten thought and feelings of many conservative members here 

Unspoken and unwritten thoughts and feelings?

Over the last four years, you have called me personally, a whore, a slut, a baby-killer, and a pedophile.  My only offense, according to you, was being a democrat or liberal or whatever.  Your friends have done the same with their trolling and off-topic stupid remarks, not just to me, but to anyone not sharing similar beliefs.  My decision to start calling you and your friends out was made when you started trolling my friend Marsha (Dowser to you).  That's when I decided to grow a pair. 

My point?  Take your definition of 'unspoken and unwritten thoughts and feelings' and stick it straight in your unused Bible.  Then tonight, be sure to set your alarm so you can get an early start to your God-loving day.  Then when you are sitting in your reserved pew space, tap the lady in front of you on the shoulder and call her a cunt.  Then call the lady sitting next to her a cunt and tell her to eat shit.  Be loud and proud about it.  Then slap a couple of AMEN!'s in for good measure.  There wouldn't be a person at Monday Night Visitation who would explain your whack outburst as some sort of payback for previous wrongs.

Here's something you don't know:  In private conversation, Perrie has taken up for your sorry behind, and the sorry behinds of your friends, more times than I care to consider.  That's how she runs this site.  She makes her decisions according to the CoC and the ToS, and not by name or persona.  For you to excuse your friend's behavior by placing some kind of blame on Perrie or Sandy and site moderation or whatever, is as repulsive as the words your friend used.

And PS:  Dump Trump 2020!

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.17  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @4.1.6    5 days ago
I sincerely hope that you take his over the top response to you and consider the unspoken Unwritten thought and feelings of many conservative members here 

How the fuck does that work Xx? Osmosis? Séance? 

Seriously, it's hard enough for some of us to 'consider' the WRITTEN thoughts and feelings of many of the conservatives here. Divining WTF y'all are secretly thinking and feeling is asking far too much and if XD's post is any example, unworthy of our time. 

I can't imagine that you or any of the other conservative members here would make excuses or be anywhere as understanding my circumstances had I gone off in public and on chat to a mod or anyone else for that matter. 

IMHO, XD's FIRST instance of verbal abuse should have resulted in being banned post haste. 

 
 
 
Ender
4.1.18  Ender  replied to  MAGA @4.1.14    5 days ago

Considering 'your side' hasn't been quiet while having power...

 
 
 
Ender
4.1.19  Ender  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1.16    5 days ago
Dump Trump 2020!

384

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.20  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @4.1.15    5 days ago

Only exactly to the extent that the resistance and opposition to Trump by your side is...nothing more, nothing less. 

 
 
 
JBB
4.1.21  JBB  replied to  MAGA @4.1.20    5 days ago

256

 
 
 
Split Personality
4.1.22  Split Personality  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1.16    5 days ago

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Split Personality
4.1.23  Split Personality  replied to  MAGA @4.1.20    5 days ago

No worse that the not so silent treatment of the previous President here and there and back again,

the more salacious the lies, the better for your conservative friends,

although I admit you were more likely to proselytize and explain your investment in Jefferson back then.

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.24  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.20    5 days ago
by your side is.

What exactly is my "side?"

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.25  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Ender @4.1.19    5 days ago

You’ll get your chance on Jan 20, 2025.  Not until then.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
4.1.26  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @4.1.14    5 days ago
Our opposition and resistance will be quite relevant in that event.  

Who are you speaking for?   I venture to guess that a lot of conservatives and R's do not want you speaking for them.  

I think that a great many people will be relieved with Trump out of office.   That includes many of his supporters.   Seems to me that those who support Trump (at least those who are rational) are in a constant state of cognitive dissonance.   They likely know that this miserable human being should never have been elected PotUS but prefer his policies to those of Biden.   So while they will likely vote for him, they will also likely not behave as you claim that you will behave.

That is, I suspect you are far more of an exception than a rule.   So, again, who do you think you are speaking for?

 
 
 
Freewill
4.1.27  Freewill  replied to  MAGA @4.1.6    5 days ago
I sincerely hope that you take his over the top response to you and consider the unspoken Unwritten thought and feelings of many conservative members here

MAGA I am glad that at least you recognize that his response was WAY over the top, and I hope you agree that his removal from this site was nobody else's fault but his own.   Everyone here should understand that we cannot treat each other like that here, nor should we in ANY venue.  

I have no idea what you mean about "unspoken/unwritten thoughts and feelings of many other conservative members here", and I hope for their sakes that this is just a misconception on your part.  If you or others really think what xD actually wrote about Perrie and Sandy, or any other moderator or member here, then I'm afraid you/they really need to get a grip.  Thinking like that can do nobody any good, and is a sure path to self-destruction.  That level of hatred and disrespect is dangerous to others and very unhealthy for those who harbor such feelings.  It is a terrible way to go through life, hating all who see the world differently.   

I truly hope that xD gives some deeper thought to what he has done and said here and that he might consider that perhaps all of this was not Perrie's fault, nor Sandy's fault, he has no one to blame but himself.  If he doesn't, and he continues to treat people that way, he will likely leave this world a very lonely person.

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.28  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.26    5 days ago

If you really think that conservatives won’t be united in opposition and resistance to Biden should he support a nuclear option on the filibuster or packing the courts, or bringing about the green new deal, Or selling our manufacturing out to China again, to name some key issues you are making the mistake or miscalculation here.  I see a Tea Party like movement building very quickly in those events...

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1.29  MUVA  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @4.1.16    5 days ago

Remember you called me a dick so your high horse has left the stable.

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1.30  MUVA  replied to  Dulay @4.1.17    5 days ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.31  Dulay  replied to  MUVA @4.1.30    4 days ago

Try reading my comment again. I'm not talking about what the mods would do, I'm taking about Xx and you other conservatives. 

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.32  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @4.1.28    4 days ago

Since conservatives aren't united in opposition and resistance against Biden NOW, what makes you think that will change? 

Oh and BTFW, the Senate controls it's own rules and the POTUS has nothing to do with it. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
4.1.33  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @4.1.28    4 days ago

You seem to presume all conservatives think like you.   Buy a vowel.

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.34  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.33    4 days ago
 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.35  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Ender @4.1.18    4 days ago

Were we supposed to be quiet?  

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.36  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.26    4 days ago

You really think that we on the right will present less opposition to Biden than we did to the dear leader wannabe messiah lord Barry when he was President?  

 
 
 
TᵢG
4.1.37  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @4.1.36    4 days ago

You invent a scenario, attribute it to me and then ask me why I believe it.  

If you cannot formulate an argument, inventing a strawman is a pathetic alternative.   Better to remain silent ...

 
 
 
Dulay
4.1.38  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @4.1.35    4 days ago

Scream at the sky all you want...

 
 
 
Ender
4.1.39  Ender  replied to  MAGA @4.1.35    4 days ago

My point was you never were quiet. Trying to say anyone could shut up some conservative voices is a misnomer in itself when it has never happened, or never could/would happen.

 
 
 
Ender
4.1.40  Ender  replied to  Dulay @4.1.38    4 days ago

If I scream in the night, I can Crack The Sky.

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.1.41  Tessylo  replied to  Gordy327 @4.1.15    4 days ago
"Sounds a little seditious."

A little?

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.1.42  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @4.1.30    4 days ago
"I have been called names in a chat and the head mod let it go it happen twice."

How long ago?

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.43  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Ender @4.1.40    4 days ago

Democrats screamed at the sky on the anniversaries of Trumps election.  

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.44  seeder  MAGA  replied to  TᵢG @4.1.37    4 days ago

Feel free to remain silent yourself! 

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.45  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.41    4 days ago

I promise to be exactly as seditious in my opposition to Biden then as you are being now in your opposition to Trump. Nothing more nothing less.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
4.1.46  TᵢG  replied to  MAGA @4.1.44    4 days ago

A Pee Wee Herman style rebuttal — akin to: “I know you are but what am I?”.    Again, sometimes it is better to remain silent ...

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.47  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.45    4 days ago

So you admit to engaging in sedition? 

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.48  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.35    4 days ago

When have you ever been quiet? 

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1.49  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.42    4 days ago

You tell me ?

 
 
 
Veronica
4.1.51  Veronica  replied to  MAGA @4.1.45    4 days ago

Like you did with Obama. Nothing new there.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
4.1.60  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Veronica @4.1.51    4 days ago

This comment is to MUVA and Tessy

Comments deleted for being off topic and meta. Please stop. Only warning.

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.61  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Ender @4.1.18    4 days ago

Nor was yours when the Obama regime was in power. 

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.62  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @4.1.47    4 days ago

No, not at all.  Do you admit that the Trump resistance is now engaging in sedition? 

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.63  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.62    4 days ago
No, not at all.

Then that's a lie, as you already admitted to that intention, "I promise to be exactly as seditious...."

Do you admit that the Trump resistance is now engaging in sedition? 

Explain how sedition is being carried out?

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.64  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @4.1.63    3 days ago

That’s the point. It isn’t sedition now and won’t be then we we do likewise.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.65  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.64    3 days ago

Then you shouldn't make declarations of wanting to engage in sedition.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
4.1.66  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  MAGA @4.1.64    3 days ago
we we do

Yes, that is what this unfounded conspiracy theory is, "wee wee doo".

"I promise to be exactly as seditious "

No one needed you to promise that, it's quite apparent from virtually every one of your comments.

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.67  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @4.1.65    3 days ago

Some Democrats are engaged in seditious acts almost every day. 

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.68  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.67    3 days ago

That's quite the accusation. I'm sure you can prove it too, right? Otherwise your statement is libelous.

 
 
 
MAGA
4.1.69  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gordy327 @4.1.68    3 days ago

Libelous against who exactly? 

 
 
 
Gordy327
4.1.70  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @4.1.69    3 days ago

You tell me! You're the one accusing "some Democrats" of seditious acts.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
6  The Magic Eight Ball    4 days ago

I say we just treat bidens accusations exactly the same way we treated that trump russia nonsense.

joe should get the same levels of skepticism and compassion trump received.

in other words... joe deserves no less than 5yrs of non stop investigations and harassment.


I'm sure joe had a good laugh or two over the last few yrs about that trump russia bs

I wonder if joe is laughing now...

 
 
 
MAGA
6.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @6    4 days ago

Joe is personally responsible for putting Trump through much of that nonsense so turnabout is fair play in his case.  As to Joe, lock 🔒him up!  

 
 
 
Gsquared
7  Gsquared    2 days ago

Breaking news:  Just revealed that Trump has secret bank account in China and earned at least $25 million from Chinese sources during his first year as President.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
7.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Gsquared @7    2 days ago

Do tell.

 
 
 
MAGA
7.1.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  sandy-2021492 @7.1    2 days ago

06-lil-guy-nrd-1080-1200x630-390x220.jpg

A.F. Branco October 20, 2020
0

Steal Team Six – A.F. Branco Cartoon

Biden claimes for the American little guy but then why is he being bought off by Wall Street and Communist…

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  sandy-2021492 @7.1    2 days ago

Yes, latest report from NYT based on Trump's tax records.

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  MAGA @7.1.1    2 days ago

That comment is a pathetic joke.  Worthless B.S.

 
 
 
JBB
7.1.4  JBB  replied to  Gsquared @7.1.3    2 days ago

I believe you went a little overboard on your assessment there. It wasn't really that good...

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.5  Gsquared  replied to  JBB @7.1.4    2 days ago

You're right.

 
 
 
MAGA
7.1.6  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gsquared @7.1.3    2 days ago

Your response is proof positive that my post is right on!  

 
 
 
MAGA
7.1.7  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JBB @7.1.4    2 days ago

It was better than good.  It was great!  

 
 
 
MAGA
7.1.8  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Gsquared @7.1.5    2 days ago

No, that would be me.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.9  Gsquared  replied to  MAGA @7.1.6    yesterday

My comment confirms that your comment is a pathetic joke and worthless B.S.

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.10  Gsquared  replied to  MAGA @7.1.8    yesterday

No, that is NEVER you.  NEVER.

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.11  Gsquared  replied to  MAGA @7.1.7    yesterday
It was great 

Only if you consider a total FAIL as great.

 
 
 
Dulay
7.2  Dulay  replied to  Gsquared @7    2 days ago

25 million that he failed to disclose on his yearly financial disclosures, which just happens to be a Federal Crime. 

But Trump...

 
 
 
MAGA
7.2.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Dulay @7.2    yesterday

It was a corporate account, not a resonant one and was intended to pay taxes due in China for family businesses there.  In other words a big nothing burger. 

 
 
 
Dulay
7.2.2  Dulay  replied to  MAGA @7.2.1    yesterday
It was a corporate account, not a resonant one and was intended to pay taxes due in China for family businesses there.

So it's you ridiculous posit that the 'GREATEST' business man on the planet left $17+ MILLION in an account to pay for a $200,000 tax liability. 

Now THAT is fucking hilarious. 

Oh and WTF is a resonant account Xx?

 
 
 
Tessylo
7.3  Tessylo  replied to  Gsquared @7    yesterday
"Breaking news:  Just revealed that Trump has secret bank account in China and earned at least $25 million from Chinese sources during his first year as President."

There are also two other secret accounts, forget where, which were never disclosed on his tax returns

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
8  sandy-2021492    23 hours ago

Thread 1.1 locked for slapfighting.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


JBB
Hal A. Lujah
GregTx
CB
lady in black
Gsquared
Gazoo
Vic Eldred
Dulay


71 visitors