‘EVOLUTION VS. GOD’ a video documentary you have to see.
Evangelist Ray Comfort has produced a 38-minute video called the Evolution vs. God documentary . The video, which received 46,000 comments in just over three weeks, has, to no ones surprise, sparked another bitter debate between the atheist community and religious believers.
Comfort claims scientists cannot offer definitive "observable evidence" for Darwins' theory. He said, his project, on YouTube since July 9, has " ....received many praise-worthy comments as well as a multitude of angry rebuttals ."Well now, isn't that a surprise!
The video consist of a highly edited taping of Comfort asking people on the street extremely loaded, almost trick questions, that are difficult to answer under the circumstances they were asked. For instance exchanges like this (paraphrased);
Q; "How long ago do you think that happened?"
A; "About 65 million years."
Q: "Can you show me observable, definitive evidence of that occurring?"
A; "No".
Q; Then why do you believe it?
A; I have confidence in the research of the scientist"
Q; So you believe in the scientist research on faith, is that right?
A; (Hesitates) "I guess"
The people on the street that were asked these questions were not the scientist that have the answers, and Comfort knew that, he framed his questions in a manner that made him confident most of the people he queried would not be able to give definitive answers to his loaded questions.
What I, and many others would like to see, is the respondents that gave Comfort definitive answers, that made too much sense to be part of his jaded "documentary", and were cut out. That's what I would like to see!
Supporters of this "documentary" are claiming Richard Dawkins will be blown away by this video. Yeah right, as he falls out of his wheelchair laughing.
Enough from me, watch the video and see for yourself, you will be blown away.
No personal attacks, if your discussion gets too heated, take it to:
Tags
Who is online
62 visitors
Those that can't understand Darwins' theory, always like to say "prove it", but when they are presented with scientific evidence and studies gathered over the past two hundred years, they are unable, or unwilling (mostly unable), to to fathom what they are shown.
Understanding science, like understanding math, geology or astronomy, is not, as some think , having "faith" in what they have learned, it is understanding what they have learned, because they have the intelligence to understand.
Most of those that refute science are people that lack the intelligence to understand science.