When Liberals Club People, It’s With Love In Their Hearts
Apparently, as long as violent leftists label their victims “fascists,” they are free to set fires, smash windows and beat civilians bloody. No police officer will stop them. They have carte blanche to physically assault anyone they disapprove of, including Charles Murray, Heather Mac Donald, Ben Shapiro, me and Milo Yiannopoulos, as well as anyone who wanted to hear us speak.
Even far-left liberals like Evergreen State professor Bret Weinstein will be stripped of police protection solely because the mob called him a “racist.”
If the liberal shock troops deem local Republicans “Nazis” — because some of them support the duly elected Republican president — Portland will cancel the annual Rose Festival parade rather than allow any Trump supporters to march.
They’re all “fascists”! Ipso facto, the people cracking their skulls and smashing store windows are “anti-fascists,” or as they call themselves, “antifa.”
SEE ALSO
Democratic Rep: What We're Seeing With Trump Is Like The Rise Of Hitler
We have no way of knowing if the speakers at the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally last weekend were “Nazis,” “white supremacists” or passionate Civil War buffs, inasmuch as they weren’t allowed to speak. The Democratic governor shut the event down, despite a court order to let it proceed.
We have only visuals presented to us by the activist media, showing some participants with Nazi paraphernalia. But for all we know, the Nazi photos are as unrepresentative of the rally as that photo of the drowned Syrian child is of Europe’s migrant crisis. Was it 1 percent Nazi or 99 percent Nazi?
As the “Unite the Right” crowd was dispersing, they were forced by the police into the path of the peace-loving, rock-throwing, fire-spraying antifa. A far-left reporter for The New York Times, Sheryl Gay Stolberg, tweeted live from the event: “The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding ‘antifa’ beating white nationalists being led out of the park.”
That’s when protestor James Fields sped his car into a crowd of the counter-protesters, then immediately hit reverse, injuring dozens of people, and killing one woman, Heather Heyer.
This has been universally labeled “terrorism,” but we still don’t know whether Fields hit the gas accidentally, was in fear for his life or if he rammed the group intentionally and maliciously.
With any luck, we’ll unravel Fields’ motives faster than it took the Obama administration to discern the motives of a Muslim shouting “Allahu Akbar!” while gunning down soldiers at Fort Hood. (Six years.)
But so far, all we know is that Fields said he was “upset about black people” and wanted to kill as many as possible. On his Facebook page, he displayed a “White Power” poster and “liked” three organizations deemed “white separatist hate groups” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. A subsequent search of his home turned up bomb-making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition and a personal journal of combat tactics.
Actually, none of that is true. The paragraph above describes, down to the letter, what was known about Micah Xavier Johnson, the black man who murdered five Dallas cops a year ago during a Black Lives Matter demonstration. My sole alteration to the facts is reversing the words “black” and “white.”
President Obama held a news conference the next day to say it’s “very hard to untangle the motives.” The New York Times editorialized agnostically that many “possible motives will be ticked off for the killer.” (One motive kind of sticks out like a sore thumb to me.)
In certain cases, the media are quite willing to jump to conclusions. In others, they seem to need an inordinate amount of time to detect motives.
The media think they already know all there is to know about James Fields, but they also thought they knew all about the Duke lacrosse players, “gentle giant” Michael Brown and those alleged gang-rapists at the University of Virginia.
Waiting for facts is now the “Nazi” position.
Liberals have Republicans over a barrel because they used the word “racist.” The word is kryptonite, capable of turning the entire GOP and 99 percent of the “conservative media” into a panicky mass of cowardice.
This week, Mitt Romney and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) — among others — instructed us that masked liberals hitting people with baseball bats are pure of heart — provided they first label the likes of Charles Murray or some housewife in a “MAGA” hat “fascists.”
Luckily, the week before opening fire on Republicans, critically injuring House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, Bernie Sanders-supporter James Hodgkinson had used the vital talisman, calling the GOP “fascist.” So you see, he wasn’t trying to commit mass murder! He was just fighting “Nazis.” Rubio and Romney will be expert witnesses.
And let’s recall the response of Hillary Clinton to the horrifying murder of five Dallas cops last year. The woman who ran against Trump displayed all the moral blindness currently being slanderously imputed to him.
In an interview on CNN about the slaughter that had taken place roughly 12 hours earlier, Hillary barely paused to acknowledge the five dead officers — much less condemn the shooting — before criticizing police for their “implicit bias” six times in about as many minutes.
What she really wanted to talk about were the two recent police shootings of black men in Baton Rouge and Minneapolis, refusing to contradict Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton’s claim that the Minneapolis shooting was based on racism.
Officers in both cases were later found innocent of any wrongdoing. Either the left has had a really bad streak of luck on their police brutality cases, or bad cops are a lot rarer than they think.
Some people would not consider the mass murder of five white policemen by an anti-cop nut in the middle of a BLM protest a good jumping-off point for airing BLM’s delusional complaints about the police. It would be like responding to John Hinckley Jr.’s attempted murder of President Reagan by denouncing Jodie Foster for not dating him.
Or, to bring it back to Charlottesville, it would be as if Trump had responded by expounding on the kookiest positions of “Unite the Right” — just as Hillary’s response echoed the paranoid obsessions of the cop-killer. Trump would have quickly skipped over the dead girl and railed against black people, Jews and so on.
That is the precise analogy to what Hillary did as the bodies of five Dallas cops lay in the morgue.
Thank God Donald J. Trump is our president, and not Mitt Romney, not Marco Rubio and not that nasty woman. https://m.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2017/08/16/when-liberals-club-people-its-with-love-in-their-hearts-n2369688
Even far-left liberals like Evergreen State professor Bret Weinstein will be stripped of police protection solely because the mob called him a “racist.”
If the liberal shock troops deem local Republicans “Nazis” — because some of them support the duly elected Republican president — Portland will cancel the annual Rose Festival parade rather than allow any Trump supporters to march.
They’re all “fascists”! Ipso facto, the people cracking their skulls and smashing store windows are “anti-fascists,” or as they call themselves, “antifa.”
SEE ALSO
Democratic Rep: What We're Seeing With Trump Is Like The Rise Of Hitler
We have no way of knowing if the speakers at the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally last weekend were “Nazis,” “white supremacists” or passionate Civil War buffs, inasmuch as they weren’t allowed to speak. The Democratic governor shut the event down, despite a court order to let it proceed.
We have only visuals presented to us by the activist media, showing some participants with Nazi paraphernalia. But for all we know, the Nazi photos are as unrepresentative of the rally as that photo of the drowned Syrian child is of Europe’s migrant crisis. Was it 1 percent Nazi or 99 percent Nazi?
As the “Unite the Right” crowd was dispersing, they were forced by the police into the path of the peace-loving, rock-throwing, fire-spraying antifa. A far-left reporter for The New York Times, Sheryl Gay Stolberg, tweeted live from the event: “The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding ‘antifa’ beating white nationalists being led out of the park.”
That’s when protestor James Fields sped his car into a crowd of the counter-protesters, then immediately hit reverse, injuring dozens of people, and killing one woman, Heather Heyer.
This has been universally labeled “terrorism,” but we still don’t know whether Fields hit the gas accidentally, was in fear for his life or if he rammed the group intentionally and maliciously.
With any luck, we’ll unravel Fields’ motives faster than it took the Obama administration to discern the motives of a Muslim shouting “Allahu Akbar!” while gunning down soldiers at Fort Hood. (Six years.)
But so far, all we know is that Fields said he was “upset about black people” and wanted to kill as many as possible. On his Facebook page, he displayed a “White Power” poster and “liked” three organizations deemed “white separatist hate groups” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. A subsequent search of his home turned up bomb-making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition and a personal journal of combat tactics.
Actually, none of that is true. The paragraph above describes, down to the letter, what was known about Micah Xavier Johnson, the black man who murdered five Dallas cops a year ago during a Black Lives Matter demonstration. My sole alteration to the facts is reversing the words “black” and “white.”
President Obama held a news conference the next day to say it’s “very hard to untangle the motives.” The New York Times editorialized agnostically that many “possible motives will be ticked off for the killer.” (One motive kind of sticks out like a sore thumb to me.)
In certain cases, the media are quite willing to jump to conclusions. In others, they seem to need an inordinate amount of time to detect motives.
The media think they already know all there is to know about James Fields, but they also thought they knew all about the Duke lacrosse players, “gentle giant” Michael Brown and those alleged gang-rapists at the University of Virginia.
Waiting for facts is now the “Nazi” position.
Liberals have Republicans over a barrel because they used the word “racist.” The word is kryptonite, capable of turning the entire GOP and 99 percent of the “conservative media” into a panicky mass of cowardice.
This week, Mitt Romney and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) — among others — instructed us that masked liberals hitting people with baseball bats are pure of heart — provided they first label the likes of Charles Murray or some housewife in a “MAGA” hat “fascists.”
Luckily, the week before opening fire on Republicans, critically injuring House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, Bernie Sanders-supporter James Hodgkinson had used the vital talisman, calling the GOP “fascist.” So you see, he wasn’t trying to commit mass murder! He was just fighting “Nazis.” Rubio and Romney will be expert witnesses.
And let’s recall the response of Hillary Clinton to the horrifying murder of five Dallas cops last year. The woman who ran against Trump displayed all the moral blindness currently being slanderously imputed to him.
In an interview on CNN about the slaughter that had taken place roughly 12 hours earlier, Hillary barely paused to acknowledge the five dead officers — much less condemn the shooting — before criticizing police for their “implicit bias” six times in about as many minutes.
What she really wanted to talk about were the two recent police shootings of black men in Baton Rouge and Minneapolis, refusing to contradict Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton’s claim that the Minneapolis shooting was based on racism.
Officers in both cases were later found innocent of any wrongdoing. Either the left has had a really bad streak of luck on their police brutality cases, or bad cops are a lot rarer than they think.
Some people would not consider the mass murder of five white policemen by an anti-cop nut in the middle of a BLM protest a good jumping-off point for airing BLM’s delusional complaints about the police. It would be like responding to John Hinckley Jr.’s attempted murder of President Reagan by denouncing Jodie Foster for not dating him.
Or, to bring it back to Charlottesville, it would be as if Trump had responded by expounding on the kookiest positions of “Unite the Right” — just as Hillary’s response echoed the paranoid obsessions of the cop-killer. Trump would have quickly skipped over the dead girl and railed against black people, Jews and so on.
That is the precise analogy to what Hillary did as the bodies of five Dallas cops lay in the morgue.
Thank God Donald J. Trump is our president, and not Mitt Romney, not Marco Rubio and not that nasty woman. https://m.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2017/08/16/when-liberals-club-people-its-with-love-in-their-hearts-n2369688
Tags
Who is online
82 visitors
Comment removed off topic [ph]
Comment removed off topic [ph]
Comment removed off topic [ph]
Any further spamming of this article will result in a 2 day suspension. [ph]
The seed is about domestic American politics, not World War Two.
It is about fighting Fascism. Americans fighting Fascism. These are directly on topic and if you don't think so then flag them!
I did. The seed is about liberals and Antifa clubbing people here in America. It's also about a complete lack of tolerance they have in this country of their domestic political opposition, thus the off topic derailing picture posts having nothing to do with the seeded article or American politics.
You seeded an article about Fascism and what you claim are unwarranted attacks on them. Therefore images of Fascists being defeated and assaulted are on topic no matter what era they are from, since they are Americans doing it! YOU opened the door so deal with it!
No, I seeded an article about Antifa and the left, labeling its domestic opposition as fascists and or nazis and using that objectifying labeling as their rational to club people over the head that they don't like.
So... let's not talk about Nazis, even though there were self-proclaimed Nazis in Charlottesville...
Why don't you want to talk about Nazis, whatever-your-name-is-this-week? Too close for comfort?
American nazis are a crazy and tiny fringe group who will rightly never have a voice in America or our politics. Even the ACLU though defended their right to march in a Jewish suburb when I was a teenager. Even though I hate everything they and the kkk stand for, Antifa had no right to attack their rally which they had a permit to have.
Antifa had no right to attack their rally which they had a permit to have.
Who attacked whom first ? I'm sure there are videos. Let's find out and prosecute them.
Antifa had no right to attack their rally which they had a permit to have.
321Steve, I totally agree. But what's even worse is that that guy from Antifa who ran over people with his car and murdered an inncoent protestor in cold blood! (Plus He also injured many people, some very seriously). Just one incident of terrible carnage that the Antifa people perpetrated in C-Ville.
They were defending themselves in Charlottesville from the White Supremacists, who came armed and spoiling for a fight, who are more politely called the "Alt-Right". Sadly they were unable to defend themselves enough to prevent the "Alt-Right" from murdering an innocent protester!
Read the CoC.
"Apparently, as long as violent leftists label their victims “fascists,” they are free to set fires, smash windows and beat civilians bloody. No police officer will stop them. They have carte blanche to physically assault anyone they disapprove of, including Charles Murray, Heather Mac Donald, Ben Shapiro, me and Milo Yiannopoulos, as well as anyone who wanted to hear us speak."
WTF are you saying that makes people want to hurt you ?
I talk all the time, about a lot of things and no one ever threatens to assault me.
It's called hyperbole.
The "me" is not me the seeder but the author of the Town Hall article in reference to herself. I'm sure she felt the love when she could not feel safe going to and speaking to students at. UC Berkeley.
OK, WTF is she saying that makes people want to hurt her ?
I talk all the time, about a lot of things and no one ever threatens to assault me.
In my opinion, If you are saying things that make people want to hurt you, maybe you should either be quiet or rethink WTF you're saying.
is there really anything that could be said at an American political rally by one side that would make it legitimate and justified for the other side to respond to those words with physical violence and or major property damage?
Charles Murray, Heather Mac Donald, Ben Shapiro, me and Milo Yiannopoulos
Which ones are dead?
Heather Heyer is actually dead. Killed by a fascist.
If Heather's case isn't enough, I can post photos of piles of corpses, slaughtered by Nazis.
He does not want to see or hear the truth because he knows, deep in what he calls a heart (though there is some debate to be had on that), that he is trying to defend the indefensible. He is trying to defend Racism, Bigotry and Fascism.
"As the “Unite the Right” crowd was dispersing, they were forced by the police into the path of the peace-loving, rock-throwing, fire-spraying antifa. A far-left reporter for The New York Times, Sheryl Gay Stolberg, tweeted live from the event: “The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding ‘antifa’ beating white nationalists being led out of the park.”
While I am usually one of the first people advocating for free speech when it comes to white supremacists or Nazis I back out.
When they want to play that race card they’re on their own. Their racism has no place in this country as far as I'm concerned, I dont go to bat for them, they seem to have more than enough bats, and shields as it is.
If Heather's case isn't enough, I can post photos of piles of corpses, slaughtered by Nazis.
Well-- then what about the police officer who was brutally beaten by someone from Antifa. (And there was even a photo !!!)
If the liberal shock troops deem local Republicans “Nazis” — because some of them support the duly elected Republican president — Portland will cancel the annual Rose Festival parade rather than allow any Trump supporters to march.
They call themselves Nazis! Proudly! It's not because of who they voted for, it's about what they are and say they are.
If the liberal shock troops deem local Republicans “Nazis”...
If the liberal shock troops deem local Republicans “Nazis”...
What Nazis?? I don't see no fuçkin' Nazis!!
Nazis have no more place in America today then they did in Germany in the 1930's. We are coddling them too much and ignoring their growing power. We don't think it can happen here, but if anyone would open their fucking eyes it is happening here RIGHT NOW!
Read your history and be warned! Those who ignore it are bound to repeat it and today's Nazis (being as they are no different then the ones in the 1930's and 40's) are hoping we are complacent and have forgotten history and are too arrogant to think it can't happen to us. They are counting on that!
The nazis and secular progressives are alike in that matter. Both are counting on real Americans being complacent. The earlier nazis learned their racism and eugenics from the European and American progressives preceding them in time.