╌>

Where Are the Brave Military Voices Against Forever War?

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  badfish  •  7 years ago  •  13 comments

Where Are the Brave Military Voices Against Forever War?

protest_soldier.jpg


















Today, my peers are silent.


But they’ve been taught the way to do it

Like Christian soldiers; not with haste

And shuddering groans; but passing through it

With due regard for decent taste

 — Siegfried Sassoon How to Die  (1918)

It is my favorite moment. Of World War I, that is. The one that stays with me.

Christmas, 1914: Nearly a million men are already dead, and the war is barely four months old.  Suddenly, and ultimately in unison, the opposing German and British troops begin singing Christmas carols. At first light, German troops emerge unarmed from their trenches, and walk out into “no-man’s land.” Despite fearing a ruse, the Brits eventually joined their sworn enemies in the churned earth between the trench lines. Carols were sung, gifts of cigarettes exchanged—one man even brought out a decorative tree. It only happened once. Though the bloody, senseless war raged across three more Christmases, the officers on each side quashed future attempts at a holiday truce. And yet, for that brief moment, in the ugliest of circumstances, the common humanity of Brits and Germans triumphed. It must have been beautiful.

Ultimately, nearly ten million men would die in battle. For all that, little was settled. It rarely is.  The ruling classes still ruled, the profiteers profited, and Europe went to war again not twenty years later. So it went, and so it goes.

Nonetheless, World War I boasted countless skeptics and anti-war activists both in and out of uniform. Their poetry and prose was dark, but oh was it ever powerful. Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen from the Brits; Erich Maria Remarque for the stoic Germans; and our own Ernest Hemingway. A lost generation, which sacrificed so much more than youth: their innocence. They call to us, these long dead dissenters, from the grave.

They might ask: Where are  today’s  skeptical veterans? Tragically, silence is our only ready response.

It was not always so in America. During the brutal Seminole Indian Wars, 17 percent of army officers resigned in disgust rather than continue burning villages and hunting natives down like dogs in Florida’s Everglades’ swamps. Mark Twain’s cheeky prose demolished the Philippine-American colonial war at the turn of the century. Hemingway laid the truth bare after being wounded in the First Great War. And Major General Smedley Butler—two-time Medal of Honor recipient though he was—emerged from the Caribbean “Banana Wars” to admit he’d been naught but a “high class muscle man for Big Business,” a “gangster for capitalism.”  

For all the celebration (and mythologizing) over World War II, at least we had Kurt Vonnegut and Joseph Heller to burst our comfortable, patriotic bubble. And, though it likely lost him the presidency, Senator John Kerry (and his Vietnam Vets against the War mates) showed the courage to testify to the truth in the Winter Soldier Hearings.

Today, despite a few brave attempts, we are treated to nothing of the sort. Why, you ask?

To begin with, most of the above mentioned wars were fought by draftees, militiamen, and short-term volunteers: in other words, citizen-soldiers. Even now, the identity of “citizen-soldier” ought to emphasize the former term:  citizen . It doesn’t. Now, as we veterans are constantly reminded, we are  warriors Professionals.  Hail Sparta!

In 2017, it’s near impossible to remember that today’s professional, volunteer army is less than half a century old, a product of epic failure in Vietnam. Most of America’s Founding Fathers, after all, scorned standing armies and favored a body of august, able citizen-soldiers. Something more akin to our National Guard. Deploy  these  men to faraway lands, so the thinking went, and each town would lose its blacksmith, carpenter, and cobbler too. Only vital interests warranted such sacrifice. Alas, it is no longer so.

In truth, the “citizen-soldier” is dead, replaced—to the sound of cheers—by self-righteous subalterns hiding beneath the sly veil of that ubiquitous corporate idiom: professionalism.  Discipline, motivation, teamwork—these are all sleek, bureaucratic terms certain to mold terrific middle managers, but they remain morally bare. And, ultimately, futile.

So today, my peers are silent. Professional officers are volunteers; dissenters are seen as little more than petulant whiners, or oddball nuts. It is hard to know why, exactly, but the increasing cognitive and spatial distance of contemporary soldiers from society at large seems a likely culprit. Combine that with the Republican Party’s veritable monopoly on the political loyalties of the officer corps and you have yourself a lethal combination.

Only don’t rule out cowardice. Who isn’t fearful for their career, income, and family stability? It is only natural.  After all, this business—despite protestations to the contrary—does not tend to value intellectualism or creative thinking. Trust me. Besides, in this struggling transitory economy, the military “welfare state” is a tempting option for America’s declining middle class. Ironic, isn’t it, that the heavily conservative officer corps loves their socialized medicine and guaranteed pensions?

Under the circumstances, perhaps silence is understandable. But it is also complicity.

By now, the wars are lost, if ever they were winnable. Iraq will fracture, Syria collapse, and Afghanistan wallow in perpetual chaos. It will be so. The people will forget. Our professional, corporate regiments will, undoubtedly, add banners to their battle flags—sober reminders of a job well done in yet another lost cause. Soldiers will toast to lost comrades, add verses to their ballads, and precious few will ask why.

Perhaps a good officer suppresses such doubt, maintains a stoic, if dour, dignity, and silently soldiers on. As for me, I am not made of such stuff, and more’s the pity. I buried seven men in the fields of the Forever War, casualties of combat and   the muted sufferings of suicide.

Their banal sacrifice demands explanation. They deserve as much.

For those lonely few, we who publicly dissent, the audience is scant, interest meagre, and our existence: solitary.

Link


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2  Kavika     7 years ago

Innocence is the first casualty of war...

Excellent article.

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Quiet
3  magnoliaave    7 years ago

It is. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    7 years ago

The story of the German and British troops getting together for Christmas during World War I is a lesson that is still taught to US Service members to this day.  The intended message is not to dehumanize our enemies.  While we are fighting it is still important to remember that our enemies are human, away and missing their families just as we are.

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
5  sixpick    7 years ago

http://www.encognitive.com/files/images/military%20industrial%20complex--dwight%20eisenhower.preview.jpg

Sometimes wars can be avoided and sometimes they can't,  but the money to be made in wars by the Industrial Military Complex is usually the driving force in almost all wars.

 
 
 
user image
Freshman Silent
6      7 years ago

What kills more " the Forever war " or HIV/AIDS?

What leaves a More devastated National State?

 
 
 
Studiusbagus
Sophomore Quiet
6.1  Studiusbagus  replied to  @6    7 years ago
What leaves a More devastated National State?

All one needs to do is look to central Africa and see what disease unchecked can do.

As much as I opposed him, GW Bush saw this and acted as did Clinton.

 
 
 
user image
Freshman Silent
6.1.1    replied to  Studiusbagus @6.1    7 years ago
All one needs to do is look to central Africa and see what disease unchecked can do. As much as I opposed him, GW Bush saw this and acted as did Clinton.

Both Ebola and Zika, originated from there  but thanks to  Fast intercontinental Transport, human greed and Sex Tourism, they are now world wide, But::

And here is the Crux. take the time to look at My Photobucket HIV/AIDS and the US of A, then follow the Clues, there of how to look up and the find the TRUE DATA about which is the most infected nation in the World, and I guarantee You, it will not show AFRICA, want to guess as to why?

 
 
 
kpr37
Professor Silent
7  kpr37    7 years ago

Where Are the Brave Military Voices Against Forever War?

History, it's a real bitch.

From John Adams." We ought not to fight them at all unless we determine to fight them forever."

Your favour of the 11th, instant I have recd. There are great and weighty Considerations urged \in it/ in favour of arming against the Algerines, and I confess, if our States could be brought to agree, in the Measure, I Should be very willing to resolve upon eternal War with them . But in such a Case We ought to conduct the War with Vigour, and protect our Trade and People. The Resolution to fight them would raise the Spirits and Courage of our Countrymen immediately, and We might obtain the Glory of finally breaking up these nests of Banditts. But Congress will never, or at least not for years, take any Such Resolution, and in the meantime our Trade and Honour suffers beyond Calculation.— We ought not to fight them at all, unless We determine to fight them forever.

Forgetfulness occurs when those who have been long inured to civilized order can no longer remember a time in which they had to wonder whether their crops would grow to maturity without being stolen or their children sold into slavery by a victorious foe....They forget that in time of danger, in the face of the enemy, they must trust and confide in each other, or perish....They forget, in short, that there has ever been a category of human experience called the enemy.

"That, before 9/11, was what had happened to us. The very concept of the enemy had been banished from our moral and political vocabulary. An enemy was just a friend we hadn't done enough for yet. Or perhaps there had been a misunderstanding, or an oversight on our part -- something that we could correct....

"Our first task is therefore to try to grasp what the concept of the enemy really means. The enemy is someone who is willing to die in order to kill you. And while it is true that the enemy always hates us for a reason, it is his reason, and not ours."

 
 
 
Tex Stankley
Freshman Silent
8  Tex Stankley    7 years ago

Sadly, Smedley Butler is long dead and gone.  

 
 

Who is online

devangelical
Nerm_L
George
Just Jim NC TttH


98 visitors