Donald Trump's Approval Rating Hits a Stunning New All-Time Low of 32 Percent
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Hits a Stunning New All-Time Low of 32 Percent
Donald Trump’s approval rating hits a stunning new all-time low of 32 percent , with his disapproval rating skyrocketing to 63 percent , according to a new Pew Research survey .
Read more: http://hinterlandgazette.com/2017/12/donald-trumps-approval-rating-hits-stunning-new-time-low-32-percent.html#ixzz50hTbikEp
Tags
Who is online
68 visitors
Limbo lower now
Limbo lower now
How low can you go
The mush mouth pro-Israel incident might have turned off some deplorables.
The base still thinks they are "winning" though.
That's still considered a strong mandate by russian puppets.
Another article to be ignored. 32% approval in the first year of a presidency is unheard of, but his cult members will blame it on Hillary I suppose.
I heard Hillary KEEPS blaming her loss on (Fill in the Blank) !
It's a good thing the MSM has been sooooo Truthful these days. How many so-called MSM reporters have been suspended or fired so far ?
Hell, even the simple ESPN (SPORTS) corporation have had to get rid of "Reporters" over this Trump Win.
kind of tells you that there are a lot of comment-tators on the WRONG Side of reality.
Mr. Green seemed to have lacked the votes to get that done. Maybe he should have done a straw poll before he made a Fool of himself at the podium.
364 against......58 for.
Gee, I wonder who the 58 were.
And yet he still occupy's the White House.
Do you have any evidence that Donald Trump is popular?
Sean Hannity's ratings and the number of page views for Infowars don't count.
Every president was elected at some point, but many of them have suffered poor approval ratings. His being elected means little. The nation has now seen him in action in the office for 10 1/2 months, and is widely appalled.
Do you have ANY evidence that Trump has popularity approaching half the country? No other president in known history had such poor approval ratings for his entire first year. People figured out (for some of them a little too late) that he is an irredeemable piece of shit.
And they can be as appalled as they wish for the next three years and nobody gives a rat's ass. Your conclusion is backward John; having been elected means everything, current approval ratings mean nothing until just before the next election in, roughly, three years. Then, and not until then, will approval ratings matter.
MSN reported it at 45% approval.
Nonsense. Politicians decide all the time whether or not to run again, or even sometimes how to vote, based on their poll ratings.
From the lady that said she doesn't believe anything the MSM says...
Tell ya what, his approval rating in the media has never risen above 45% and that was during the run up to the election. Once the election started, his approval rating sank to below 40% and has remained there ever since.....
Yet, he stomped all republican party opposition into the ground and won an election for president despite his "approval rating"
That should tell everyone all they need to know about the media derived "approval ratings"
They do not reflect anything real......
Pew Research Center is a non-partisan think tank.
Maybe Pew should have spent MORE time on what was ACTUALLY going on in the real world, than spending so much time on the difference in which Men and Women, races, religion, etc.... are voting FOR Hillary.
Polling in general was.....OH SO WRONG !
So is the Heritage Foundation .
But that doesn't stop the left wingers from calling it a conservative hog pit sweets......
Uh, this poll had nothing to do with Hillary. You can't seem to let her go, can you ?
The Heritage Foundation (abbreviated to Heritage ) [2] [3] is an American conservative public policy think tank
from Wiki.
Hillary lives rent-free in your head. She's totally irrelevant now. Let her go
The Heritage Foundation doesn't seem to think that it's non parisian.
From their website.
Someone should spend more time telling HER to STFU than. She's the Democrats worst enemy now.
I don't even listen to her!
It's a "Poll". That's all I need to hear/see. If liberals want to hang their hats on that crap again.....Long live the willowing Democrats. We will miss you......NOT !
Good thing.
Maybe her sibling legacy can win ?
HA! The jokes's on you! There's nothing in my head!
When I searched "non-partisan think tank" Google shows a list, it was third on the listing.
I know it's partisan, every bit as partisan as Pew...... (which wasn't listed as non-partisan by google)
I KNOW it is a partisan organization. That is my point.....
ALL of them are in one way or another. Some more obvious that others....
News? No. Information, yes and it's pretty damn spot on. Just because you don't agree with something they said doesn't make them partisan.
No, it wasn't. Polls reflect the popular vote, which Hillary won. They do NOT reflect the electorate.
What do you mean by that? Also, are you saying that polls do NOT reflect the popular vote?
Look at the numbers you posted. Hillary won the popular vote by `4.5%.. Pretty close to the numbers you listed. You helped me prove my point, thanks.
Another one that can't let go of Hillary. You guys gotta move on. You'll find someone new.
I don't know what you meant, but I doubt if that is acceptable. You look headed for a vacation to me unless you get your comments under control. No skin off my nose.
Wow, you are just one personal attack after another. Now you attack me saying I am not a veteran? I am betting that's a CoC violation.
Need to unpack that BS: First the national polls got the popular vote almost on the nose. Second, the state polls for those states where Trump "won" by 60,000 votes to get him his EV "win" were all over the place but had one thing in common--in the last week of the campaign they were narrowing.
Here ya go. They give these out to just anyone, don't you know? I'll accept your apology now. Don't ever question my military service again. And yes, I literally just took that picture 5 minutes ago, you can look at the time stamp if you like.
Never said anything about Trump going ahead, just that the gap was closing right up to the last day; so nice-try-no-cigar for trying to push a lie. I see Mr. Frost has kicked your ass but good for doing this kind of shit.
Here, have another!!!
Wiki is well know for it's inaccuracies and on certain subjects bias....
It is a good source to start research, it is NOT research in and of itself.
Former Wiki editor here. In fact even you can be a Wiki editor, all you have to do is start editing.....
Doesn't require any intelligence at all...
Inaccuracy in places? Sure, I will buy that. Bias? I haven't seen a lot of bias on Wiki, I am sure there is some, so I won't say you are wrong. I have seen both side quote it quite a bit. Just sayin..
Oh, that IS rich coming from someone who no doubt relies on FarzNooz for large doses of total BS.
That explains a lot. When someone just looks at the Google search list and no further it's no wonder that the result is constant BS.
Another one that doesn't get the point of my posting......
Good Wiki articles come with extensive, footnoted sources so it takes little effort to check statements out for accuracy or get more details. I suspect you have either not noticed this feature or don't put the extra effort or are afraid to have your own preconceived notions destroyed by doing so.
100% agreement, but yes there is plain bias on some topics. Just try the Barack Obama wiki page for example..... (nothing but bias)
Wiki is subject to the editors and the editors can control the pages they edit. there is one on a video show ran for 17 seasons had a facing table showing the dates the seasons ran. the problem I tried to correct was their dates were overlapping, which means the seasons were running at the same time....
I showed them the Cineflix (show producer) pages which showed the accurate dates and episode listing, but the main editor got all the changes I made reversed but then had me banned form editing the article.
Despite having the actual producers accurate listings......
NEVER trust Wiki for anything accurate, ALWAYS check the basis of anything it claims....
When I quote Wiki it is always AFTER I have checked it's info....
It's hilarious that you think you have a "point."
And a perfect example of your prejudging...... (and bias)
Thank you..
(jeese what a tool)
I think it is stunning that you didn't get it....
Looks like the mods are fine with it.
https://secured.heritage.org/join-heritage-parallax/?utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=donate
The headline on the front page of their website:
Join the most influential conservative group in America
[insert hilarious laughter emoticon]
Poll's reflect what pollsters "WANT YOU TO KNOW" !
This last election showed that, as the polling "FAILED" at what they were trying to portrait.
"HILLARY HAS HER ERECTION SOWED UP" ?