Nunes calls for House probe of 42 Obama-era anti-Trump activists

Nunes calls for House probe of 42 Obama-era anti-Trump activists
Via:   old-school-marine
Created:   one week ago
Comments:   68

Tags

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Rep. Devin Nunes is referring 42 Obama administration officials, FBI agents and outside political activists to a House task force for as investigation into how the Obama Justice Department targeted the Donald Trump campaign.

If the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and Judiciary Committee agree, their task force would conduct the most extensive probe to date on anti-Trump government operations in 2016.

Mr. Nunes, Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, has sent letters to Oversight head Trey Gowdy of South Carolina and Judiciary’s Bob Goodlatte of Virginia.

The California Republican is asking his fellow GOP legislators to summon for public testimony all 42 — a cast of FBI, Justice Department and State Department officials and outside anti-Trump people with whom they communicated.

Nunez.jpg

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_profile_id: user_id parameter required
Old School Marine
1  Old School Marine    one week ago

Through subpoenas, Mr. Nunes also forced Democrats to acknowledge that the dossier was financed by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign. He says the FBI abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by using opposition research on one party to spy on the other––in this case the Trump team.

 
 
Tessylo
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Old School Marine @1    one week ago

Nunes?  The one who ran to Rump to obstruct the Russian investigations?  He's real trustworthy, NOT.

 
 
NORMAN-D
1.1.2  NORMAN-D  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    6 days ago

Deleted

 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
1.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Old School Marine @1    one week ago

Only a sucker's sucker would put any trust in anything that ratfucking, lying Nunes says.  He makes scum look like yummy icing.  

 
 
Old School Marine
1.2.1  Old School Marine  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.2    one week ago

Can you anything contained in the article?

If you can then get after it and let's see what you have in the way of factual evidence.

 
 
MUVA
1.2.2  MUVA  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.2    one week ago

[deleted]

 
 
Old School Marine
1.2.3  Old School Marine  replied to  MUVA @1.2.2    one week ago

Removed for context

Notice how they come here and rant and rage and name call and claim this is fake, yer when you simply ask them to refute the information contained in the article all of a sudden they become conveniently MIA?

 
 
MUVA
1.2.4  MUVA  replied to  Old School Marine @1.2.3    one week ago

They are void of reason it's like the AG report is fake or all the revelations that have come to light  like the text messages are all fake.

 
 
Old School Marine
1.2.5  Old School Marine  replied to  MUVA @1.2.4    one week ago
They are void of reason it's like the AG report is fake or all the revelations that have come to light  like the text messages are all fake.

They will deny it as the jail doors close on some of them.

 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
1.2.6  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.2    one week ago

(Deleted, labling)  (deleted, sweeping Generalization ) His carefully redacted phony committee report was shredded to bits when the Dems put out the unredacted version.  

 
 
Old School Marine
1.2.7  Old School Marine  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.2.6    one week ago
Nobody gives a shit about how badly you hate the President, he is not the topic of this thread.  SPeak the the content of the article or leave.

 
 
Dulay
1.2.8  Dulay  replied to  Old School Marine @1.2.3    6 days ago
Notice how they come here and rant and rage and name call and claim this is fake, yer when you simply ask them to refute the information contained in the article all of a sudden they become conveniently MIA?

Well gee OSM, if there were only a modicum of information contained in the article to refute. There isn't. 

Every single ink in the 'article' links to a WT topics page. There isn't one link to an actual statement from Nunes. Hell, there isn't even a quoted statement in the whole fucking article. 

You posted a WT 'story' about a Nunes fairy tale list of people being sent to a fairy tale 'task force' that doesn't even exist. 

Post a link to this list of 42 names with the allegations, a document that Nunes sent to Goldlatte, ANYTHING! 

Until then: 

Avoidshinyobjectsyndrome.jpg

 
 
NORMAN-D
1.2.9  NORMAN-D  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.2    6 days ago

[deleted]What's the price of bread in East Berlin today...or, for that matter, the price of straws in the peoples republic of Portland. 

 
 
Dulay
1.2.10  Dulay  replied to  Old School Marine @1.2.3    6 days ago

crickets.gif

 
 
epistte
1.2.11  epistte  replied to  NORMAN-D @1.2.9    4 days ago
[deleted]What's the price of bread in East Berlin today...or, for that matter, the price of straws in the peoples republic of Portland.

East Berlin hasn't existed for almost 30 years, ( deleted )

Why do you care about straws in Portland?

Nunes sounds suspiciously like Joe McCarthy in the 1950s.

 
 
Old School Marine
1.2.12  Old School Marine  replied to  epistte @1.2.11    4 days ago

Do not name call people on my threads, thanks.

 
 
epistte
1.2.13  epistte  replied to  Dulay @1.2.8    4 days ago

Ther Moonie Times isn't even well-written fiction. 

ruden defends his papers style of journalism as being more in tune with the public than other mainstream media. "We would not only cover the news without slant or bias, but give voice to those who had been shut out of the national debate. This challenged a smug and entrenched journalism establishment that was swiftly losing touch with its constituency," was how he explained the charter of the paper.

"The one constant would be our editorial independence. We would never be told to put anything in the paper; more important, perhaps, we would never be asked to leave anything out. All that was ever asked was to be faithful to the task of reporting the news without fear or favor, to get it first and get it right", Pruden told those attending the Heritage Foundation's 'Second Annual Distinguished Journalist Lecture'.

"We hold to conservative political views, but we do not cover the news with a conservative slant or bias. A newspaper with a conservative bias in covering the news is no better than the newspapers with a liberal bias, because the reader can never know when someone is blowing smoke at him. We keep our opinions, and we have a few, to the editorial and commentary pages, or to columns clearly identified as opinion, in the honored tradition of American newspapers," he said.

Gene Grabowski, who resigned in 1988 over the misleading alternation of an article, said of the Washington Times: "It's the Fox News of the print world."

 
 
Skrekk
1.3  Skrekk  replied to  Old School Marine @1    one week ago

So.......pro-Trump Russian agents and their co-conspirators are OK, but non-partisan civil servants and anti-Trump American civilians are a problem?     Only in the world of a loon like Nunes who was part of Trump's transition team.     Apparently his real goal is to Make America Russia Again.

 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
1.3.1  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Skrekk @1.3    one week ago

Yeah, that's about it for our phony "patriots" who hide behind the flag and flash the bible and are ready at any point to stab this country in the back.  

 
 
Old School Marine
1.3.2  Old School Marine  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @1.3.1    one week ago

Don't make sweeping generalizations on my threads.

 
 
Ozzwald
1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Old School Marine @1    5 days ago
Through subpoenas, Mr. Nunes also forced Democrats to acknowledge that the dossier was financed by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Through subpoenas?  Who else would fund opposition research other than the opposition and of course the Free Beacon right wing newspaper?

He says the FBI abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by using opposition research on one party to spy on the other––in this case the Trump team.

He says it, but his committee's investigation was unable to prove anything even close to that.

 
 
Dulay
1.4.1  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @1.4    5 days ago
He says the FBI abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by using opposition research on one party to spy on the other––in this case the Trump team.

That despite the FACT that Page wasn't a member of the Trump team when the FISA warrant was issued. 

 
 
Ozzwald
1.4.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Dulay @1.4.1    5 days ago
That despite the FACT that Page wasn't a member of the Trump team when the FISA warrant was issued.

No he wasn't, but he WAS when the FISA warrant was renewed.

 
 
Dulay
1.4.3  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @1.4.2    5 days ago
No he wasn't, but he WAS when the FISA warrant was renewed.

Nope. Page left in September and never rejoined the campaign. The FISA warrant was filed in October. 

 
 
Ozzwald
1.4.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Dulay @1.4.3    5 days ago
Nope. Page left in September and never rejoined the campaign. The FISA warrant was filed in October.

FISA warrant was renewed 3 times, try again.

 
 
Dulay
1.4.5  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @1.4.4    4 days ago
FISA warrant was renewed 3 times, try again.

Page left that campaign in September of 2016. There are a plethora of articles about that fact all over the internet from that time period with quotes from Hope Hicks, Steven Miller and Trump himself stating that Page wasn't a part of campaign as of September.  

The FISA warrant was authorized in October of 2016, a month AFTER Page LEFT the 'Trump team'.

How many times the FISA warrant was renewed is irrelevant since Page never returned to the Campaign after Sept. 2016, wasn't a member of the transition team or a member of the Administration. 

How was THAT try Ozz? 

 
 
Ozzwald
1.4.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Dulay @1.4.5    4 days ago
How was THAT try Ozz?

That was fine, so what you are saying is that the FISA warrants on Page were perfectly legal.  They just didn't happen because of the Trump investigation and therefore may have been able to provide evidence that leads to Trump.  I think I understand what you are saying, but no clue what it has to do with the alleged illegality of the FISA warrants.

 
 
Dulay
1.4.7  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @1.4.6    4 days ago
That was fine, so what you are saying is that the FISA warrants on Page were perfectly legal.

Actually, I didn't say a word about the 'legality' of the FISA warrant. 

They just didn't happen because of the Trump investigation and therefore may have been able to provide evidence that leads to Trump.

Didn't say a word about that either. Why be misleading about my comments? 

I think I understand what you are saying, but no clue what it has to do with the alleged illegality of the FISA warrants.

There is only ONE reason that Nunes gives a shit about Page and that reason is as a deflection. As you pointed out, Nunes' dog and pony show memo didn't PROVE that the FISA warrant was nefarious in any way. But it sure as hell IS a shinny object used to divert investigators, waste time and deflect from the actual purpose of the House Committee's investigation. 

One VERY telling bit of flotsam and jetsam is that Devin Nunes was the one who shepherded the most recent FISA 702 renewal through the House. They gave Rep. Amash a vote on his amendment that would have required a warrant for surveillance on American citizens. Nunes spoke and voted AGAINST the Amendment. Not ONE Amendment by Nunes or anyone else on his 'in the know' Committee. The vote was a blowout. 

 
 
Ozzwald
1.4.8  Ozzwald  replied to  Dulay @1.4.7    4 days ago
Actually, I didn't say a word about the 'legality' of the FISA warrant.

Then why the hell are you commenting on a thread that is discussing the legality of the FISA warrant????

There is only ONE reason that Nunes gives a shit about Page and that reason is as a deflection.

Wait, what??? 

Of course it is a deflection, anybody that has done even the smallest amount of research into FISA procedures knows that it is a deflection.  Carter Page has had "Russian Agent" tattooed on his ass for years before the Trump campaign, and has probably been monitored by the FBI long before Trump ever came down that ridiculous escalator.

Nunes's entire job in life is to provide distractions for, and relay any new intelligence that his committee may find out about, to Trump.

 
 
Dulay
1.4.9  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @1.4.8    4 days ago
Then why the hell are you commenting on a thread that is discussing the legality of the FISA warrant????

The claim was made that: 

the FBI abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by using opposition research on one party to spy on the other––in this case the Trump team.

That claim is false. I stated WHY it's false. The Page warrant had NOTHING to do with 'spying on the Trump team'.

We KNOW this because of the information that has been released to date and THAT information has been dissected into hamburger. Unless and until the actual application for the Page FISA warrant is release [which would be a travesty] there is no way the right will believe that the FISA warrant was kosher and if past is prologue, even clear and concise evidence won't deter then from their rabid attack on the FBI and all things 'law and order'. 

Wait, what???
Of course it is a deflection, anybody that has done even the smallest amount of research into FISA procedures knows that it is a deflection. Carter Page has had "Russian Agent" tattooed on his ass for years before the Trump campaign, and has probably been monitored by the FBI long before Trump ever came down that ridiculous escalator.
Nunes's entire job in life is to provide distractions for, and relay any new intelligence that his committee may find out about, to Trump.

In that we are in complete agreement. I would add, it seems to me that Nunes isn't JUST covering Trump's ass. Nunes may have some skin in this game and is defending Trump to defend himself. I read a thingy about his wheeling and dealing in CA but since my brain leaks, I can't quite bring up the file...something more pressing took over it's prominence, like making the best French onion soup on the planet right this minute. It is AWESOME!

 
 
Ozzwald
1.4.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Dulay @1.4.9    4 days ago
Nunes may have some skin in this game and is defending Trump to defend himself.

Interesting theory.  Mine goes in a different direction, I believe Nunes and several Congressman have discovered the open wallet that is Russia, and is trying to get their share, through Trump.  I have no other idea why some of them would travel to Russia on the 4th.

 
 
Dulay
1.4.11  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @1.4.10    4 days ago

Sounds like a reason for Trump to sidle up to Putin too. The fact that Putin is a homicidal maniac, has gutted his own country and has attacked the US be damned. Trump wants to be best buddies with the richest man in the world and he's willing to sell out the western world to get there...

 
 
Ozzwald
1.4.12  Ozzwald  replied to  Dulay @1.4.11    4 days ago
Trump wants to be best buddies with the richest man in the world and he's willing to sell out the western world to get there...

Agree 100%.  Everything Trump has done so far has been to enrich himself.

 
 
Heartland American
1.5  Heartland American  replied to  Old School Marine @1    4 days ago

About time!  Yes!  

 
 
Tessylo
2  Tessylo    one week ago

There was no targeting of  rumps campaign by the Obama administration. None.  

 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
2.1  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Tessylo @2    one week ago

Christamighty, they can't even stay on message for this one.  One week it's Obama's fault for not blowing the whistle on Rightwing's FatNastyJesus' campaign conspiracy with Russia and the next is this warmed over bullshit.  

 
 
Old School Marine
2.2  Old School Marine  replied to  Tessylo @2    one week ago
There was no targeting of  rumps campaign by the Obama administration. None.

According to whom and what evidence to you have to validate this bullshit?  Fuckall, that's what you have. 

Nothing 

 
 
Tessylo
2.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Old School Marine @2.2    one week ago

That's what you have OSM.   Fuckall nothing against President Obama and his administration, nothing, zip, zero, NADA, diddly squat

 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
2.2.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Old School Marine @2.2    one week ago
Fuckall, that's what you have.

That's a lot more than you've got with a scumbucket like Nunes as your source.  You must like getting humiliated if you line up behind shitballs like him.  

 
 
Old School Marine
2.2.3  Old School Marine  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.1    one week ago
Fuckall nothing against President Obama and his administration, nothing, zip, zero, NADA, diddly squat

Then refute the information contained in the article.

 
 
Old School Marine
2.2.4  Old School Marine  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @2.2.2    one week ago
That's a lot more than you've got with a scumbucket like Nunes as your source.  You must like getting humiliated if you line up behind shitballs like him.

I published an article containing facts.  If you can refute those facts then do it.

CAN YOU?

 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
2.2.5  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Old School Marine @2.2.4    one week ago

Been done and done.  If if comes out of Nunes filthy shit-filled mouth it's pure lies.  It's been that way ever since he made that phony trip to the WH  last year to provide them with "intelligence" that the WH fed to him.  This is the kabuki theater shit that's made Nunes infamous as a traitor, liar and criminal.  

 
 
Dulay
2.2.6  Dulay  replied to  Old School Marine @2.2.3    6 days ago
Then refute the information contained in the article.

Again, there IS not information contained in the article. 

See  https://thenewstalkers.com/community/discussion/40903/nunes-calls-for-house-probe-of-42-obama-era-anti-trump-activists#cm829981

 
 
Dulay
2.2.7  Dulay  replied to  Old School Marine @2.2.4    6 days ago
I published an article containing facts.

Nope, you published an 'article' containing statements that tell a story. 

If you can refute those facts then do it.

No facts to refute. 

 
 
Ozzwald
2.2.8  Ozzwald  replied to  Old School Marine @2.2    5 days ago
According to whom and what evidence to you have to validate this bullshit?

Can't prove a negative [deleted]  After over 2 years and there has not been any evidence supporting the right's claim against Obama should be all you need.

After all, after a little over 1 year, guilty pleas and indictments, and you all are complaining about the Mueller investigation length.

 
 
Vic Eldred
3  Vic Eldred    one week ago

Obviously, we need to know exactly when this investigation began. The FBI has clung to what is becoming a shaky date of July 31, 2016 based on the information provided by an Australian diplomat concerning statements made by a drunk campaign volunteer. That "claim" was made when it was discovered that the FBI used an unverified document (which was nothing more than opposition research) to obtain FISA warrants.

If it can be proven that the FBI investigation really began before that date, the entire FBI investigation becomes completely discredited and we may finally see some criminal indictments.

 
 
Old School Marine
3.1  Old School Marine  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    one week ago
If it can be proven that the FBI investigation really began before that date, the entire FBI investigation becomes completely discredited and we may finally see some criminal indictments.

I believe it will be proven this is the case, that date is borderline credible at best. 

Look at these two on here screaming bullshit, yet consistently failing to post anything credible to refute the information contained in the article.

 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Old School Marine @3.1    one week ago
I believe it will be proven this is the case, that date is borderline credible at best.

As I say, it seems the FBI made that argument only after being accused of starting the investigation with the Steele Dossier. Thus they used the babel of a drunk Papadopolous as the reason for a counterintelligence investigation. Many progressives on here and elsewhere have repeated the claim. Once that card is removed the entire house of cards comes down.

 
 
Old School Marine
3.1.2  Old School Marine  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    one week ago
Once that card is removed the entire house of cards comes down.

Yes indeed and Lord knows that house they built is crumbling fast.  We'll see indictments over this I would imagine.

 
 
Colour Me Free
3.1.3  Colour Me Free  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    one week ago

The NY Times says that Carter Page's early July 2016 visit to Russia was a catalyst to the investigation .. although everyone is sticking to the story the investigation began in late July...

WASHINGTON — Ever since F.B.I. investigators discovered in 2013 that a Russian spy was trying to recruit an American businessman named Carter Page, the bureau maintained an occasional interest in Mr. Page. So when he became a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign last year and gave a Russia-friendly speech at a prestigious Moscow institute, it soon caught the bureau’s attention.

That trip last July was a catalyst for the F.B.I. investigation into connections between Russia and President Trump’s campaign, according to current and former law enforcement and intelligence officials.

It is unclear exactly what about Mr. Page’s visit drew the F.B.I.’s interest: meetings he had during his three days in Moscow, intercepted communications of Russian officials speaking about him, or something else.

The Steele dossier perhaps?

...

When the F.B.I. opened its investigation in late July, agents were just beginning to explore whether Mr. Trump’s advisers had contacts with Russian government officials or intelligence operatives, according to the current and former American officials, who spoke about the continuing inquiry on the condition of anonymity. In the months that followed, they said, more evidence came to light, including intercepts of Russian officials discussing Mr. Page and other Trump associates.

In his talk at the New Economic School in Moscow, Mr. Page criticized American policy toward Russia in terms that echoed the position of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, declaring, “Washington and other Western capitals have impeded potential progress through their often hypocritical focus on ideas such as democratization, inequality, corruption and regime change.” His remarks accorded with Mr. Trump’s positive view of the Russian president, which had prompted speculation about what Mr. Trump saw in Mr. Putin — more commonly denounced in the United States as a ruthless, anti-Western autocrat.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/19/us/politics/carter-page-russia-trump.html

I love a good conspiracy … supposedly Steele reached out to the FBI with information of a possible security issue over whether there was blackmailing of a presidential candidate … the Steele dossier was written between June and December of 2016...

However, I speculate that in March 2016 when Page first became involved with the Trump campaign the FBI was all over it .. just my speculation mind you!

 
 
Old School Marine
3.1.4  Old School Marine  replied to  Colour Me Free @3.1.3    one week ago
supposedly Steele reached out to the FBI with information of a possible security issue over whether there was blackmailing of a presidential candidate

That alone would be cause for a much deeper investigation

 
 
Colour Me Free
3.1.5  Colour Me Free  replied to  Old School Marine @3.1.4    one week ago

As I said I love a good conspiracy .. here is an interesting read and opinion piece from Forbes...  Enjoy : )

The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why

...

The Orbis report makes as if it knows all the ins-and-outs and comings-and-goings within Putin’s impenetrable Kremlin. It reports information from anonymous “trusted compatriots,” “knowledgeable sources,” “former intelligence officers,” and “ministry of foreign affairs officials.” The report gives a fly-on-the-wall account of just about every conceivable event associated with Donald Trump’s Russian connections. It claims to know more than is knowable as it recounts sordid tales of prostitutes, “golden showers,” bribes, squabbles in Putin’s inner circle, and who controls the dossiers of kompromat (compromising information).

There are two possible explanations for the fly-on-the-wall claims of the Orbis report: Either its author (who is not Mr. Steele) decided to write fiction, or collected enough gossip to fill a 30-page report, or a combination of the two. The author of the Orbis report has one more advantage: He knew that what he was writing was unverifiable. He advertises himself as the only Kremlin outsider with enough “reliable” contacts to explain what is really going within Putin’s office.

As someone who has worked for more than a decade with the microfilm collection of Soviet documents in the Hoover Institution Archives, I can say that the dossier itself was compiled by a Russian, whose command of English is far from perfect and who follows the KGB (now FSB) practice of writing intelligence reports, in particular the practice of capitalizing all names for easy reference. The report includes Putin’s inner circle – Peskov, Ivanov, Sechin, Lavrov. The anonymous author claims to have “trusted compatriots” who knew the roles that each Kremlin insider, including Putin himself, played in the Trump election saga and were prepared to tell him.

The Orbis report spins the tale of Putin insiders, spurred on by Putin himself, engaging in a five-year courtship of Donald Trump in which they offer him lucrative real estate deals that he rejects but leaves himself open to blackmail as a result of sexual escapades with prostitutes in St. Petersburg and Moscow (the famous “golden shower” incident). Despite his reluctance to enter into lucrative business deals, Trump “and his inner circle have accepted regular intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals,” according to the Orbis report.

This story makes no sense. In 2011, when the courtship purportedly begins, Trump was a TV personality and beauty pageant impresario. Neither in the U.S. or Russia would anyone of authority anticipate that Trump would one day become the presidential candidate of a major U.S. political party, making him the target of Russian intelligence.

The Orbis report claims, that as the election neared (July 2016), Igor Sechin, Putin’s right-hand man and CEO of Rosneft (Russia’s national oil company) offered Trump a deal that defies belief. I quote:

“Speaking to a trusted compatriot in mid-October 2015, a close associate of Rosneft President and PUTIN ally Igor SECHIN elaborated on the reported secret meeting between the latter and Carter PAGE, of US Republican presidential candidate's foreign policy team, in Moscow in July 2016. The secret had been confirmed to him/her by a senior member of staff, in addition to the Rosneft President himself…Sechin’s associate said that the Rosneft President was so keen to lift personal and corporate Western sanctions imposed on the company, that he offered PAGE associates the brokerage of up to a 19 per cent (privatized) stake in Rosneft in return PAGE had expressed interest and confirmed that were TRUMP elected US president, then sanctions on Russia would be lifted.”

This story is utter nonsense, not worthy of a wacky conspiracy theory of an alien invasion....

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2017/01/13/the-trump-dossier-is-false-news-and-heres-why/#35321c7f6867

 
 
Old School Marine
3.1.6  Old School Marine  replied to  Colour Me Free @3.1.5    one week ago

Gotta say that's a pretty interesting read.

 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.7  Vic Eldred  replied to  Colour Me Free @3.1.3    6 days ago

I would think that at this point the FBI needs to explain to all of us, but especially Page about why an American citizen was so thoroughly investigated for so long.

 
 
Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו
3.2  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    one week ago
Obviously, we need to know exactly when this investigation began.

[deleted]  You'll grab any thread no matter how slender and fragile to hang on to the hope that Trump and his entire criminal enterprise isn't up to their eyeballs in treason.  

 
 
Old School Marine
3.2.1  Old School Marine  replied to  Atheist יוחנן בן אברהם אבינו @3.2    one week ago

Stop attacking other members on my threads.  Either speak to the topic or leave.

Last warning.

 
 
PJ
4  PJ    4 days ago

God - this man should win the "Worst American" award but unfortunately that title goes to Mr. Trump's followers .....although I guess he would qualify as a Trump follower so maybe he does get the title after all.  

 
 
Old School Marine
4.1  Old School Marine  replied to  PJ @4    4 days ago

Don't make sweeping generalizations on my threads and thanks in advance.

 
 
PJ
4.1.1  PJ  replied to  Old School Marine @4.1    4 days ago

I do not feel it is a sweeping generalization but I am happy to honor your request  I generally try and avoid your seeds so as not to upset you and must have overlooked that this one was yours.  I will move along.

 
 
Old School Marine
4.1.2  Old School Marine  replied to  PJ @4.1.1    4 days ago

No you're more than welcome to comment on my threads, I enjoy what you have to say whether I disagree most times or not, but when you call all Trump supporters the worst Americans, you are very much making a generalization.  I am a Trump supporter and I consider myself to be a proud American.

Best Regards

 
 
Hal A. Lujah
5  Hal A. Lujah    4 days ago

I wonder how many roads and bridges could be rehabilitated with the money Nunes want's to squander?

 
 
Old School Marine
5.1  Old School Marine  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5    4 days ago
I wonder how many roads and bridges could be rehabilitated with the money Nunes want's to squander?

Not nearly as many as could be built and/or repaired with that 4 billion or whatever it was Obama gave to Iran.  Or the money already spent on the Mueller investigation which should already have been shut down.

 
 
Hal A. Lujah
5.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Old School Marine @5.1    4 days ago

You mean Iran’s money?  How would you feel about Iran trying to steal four billion dollars from the US?  Money on Mueller will be well spent once it removes Trump, and relegates the Trump administration’s legacy to the halls of shame for eternity.

 
 
KDMichigan
5.1.2  KDMichigan  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.1    4 days ago
and relegates the Trump administration’s legacy to the halls of shame for eternity.

Unfortunately President Trump has already turned over the token who used to reside in the White House EO's and once the failing ACA is allowed to crash and burn he will go down as the worse president in history. his only legacy is being, well Token.

 
 
Hal A. Lujah
5.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  KDMichigan @5.1.2    4 days ago

I think you might be tokin’.  Can you rephrase that in English?

 
 
KDMichigan
5.1.4  KDMichigan  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.3    4 days ago

Unfortunately President Trump has already turned over the token, who used to reside in the White House, EO's.

Once the failing ACA is allowed to crash and burn he will go down as the worse president in history.

His only legacy is being, well Token.

deleted

 
 
Hal A. Lujah
5.1.5  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  KDMichigan @5.1.4    4 days ago

ESOTERIC


Es`o*ter"ic [Gr. In.]

Designed for, and understood by, the specially initiated alone; not communicated, or not intelligible, to the general body of followers

 
 
Old School Marine
5.1.6  Old School Marine  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.1    4 days ago
Money on Mueller will be well spent once it removes Trump, and relegates the Trump administration’s legacy to the halls of shame for eternity.

Yeah well you come on back and let us all know how that fantasy plays out for ya.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

sixpick
Drakkonis
epistte
Enoch
Gordy327
pat wilson
arkpdx
dave-2693993


45 visitors