╌>

There Is Only One Antidote For Trump's Lies - IMPEACHMENT

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  johnrussell  •  6 years ago  •  24 comments

There Is Only One Antidote For Trump's Lies - IMPEACHMENT

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Democrats Need to Fight for Impeachment — It's the Only Antidote to the Trump 's Lies













If you’re playing chess with someone who puts a hand grenade on the board, you don’t try to capture the grenade with your bishop.








screen_shot_2018-07-12_at_1.40.33_pm.png




Living through the Trump era is like being critically ill yet being denied the medicine that could make you better.

White House Counsel John Dean famously told President Richard Nixon, at the height of the Watergate scandal, that the coverup of the break-in at the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee was a “cancer on the presidency.” If only we were so lucky. Donald Trump ’s malignant presidency has been eating away at our entire political system.

So when newly nominated Democratic House candidate  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez  recently declared her support for impeaching Trump , I found myself thinking, not at all for the first time: Oh, right. We have a vaccine. We’re just so afraid of offending the anti-vaxxers that we’d rather cure ourselves with positive thinking and a juice cleanse.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are of the opinion, you see, that despite  Nixon-in-1974 poll numbers  supporting impeachment, Democrats explicitly calling for it would only help Republicans running in the midterm elections. Which no doubt it would, if Democratic leaders were to approach it the way they tend approach other goals — like they kinda, sorta want it but it’s probably not something they should go into any detail about or get all righteous about or anything and, OK, you know what? Forget they ever mentioned it.

Which, you know, is — God, I can barely type the words at this point —  exactly why Trump won. 

By vastly underestimating the metastatic reach of modern, paranoid right-wing ideology and the tenacious hold it can take in the public consciousness, Democrats have ceded more than mere political ground. Years of substantive and rhetorical compromise with a  Republican Party that feeds on fantasy  has nourished an ever-expanding, corrosive lunacy that grows harder to stem with each dispiriting news cycle. Now, in the person of newly nominated prospective Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, it's on the brink of blocking future Democratic attempts at a cure, and destroying everything.

I know, I know: Democrats don’t have the votes to impeach Trump  now. They may not have them after the midterms either, even if they win a House majority. Yes. Also, that sound you’re hearing is the sound of a President Who Didn’t Have the Votes to Become President laughing all the way to the Deutsche Bank.

If you’re playing chess with someone who puts a hand grenade on the board, you don’t try to capture the grenade with your bishop. You recognize that you are no longer playing chess, that something else is now occurring where there once was chess, and you react accordingly. You flip over the board. Then you flip the table and go find some guys who know how to toss a grenade or two themselves. Hoping to stop Trump by tapping his shoulder lightly with Chuck Schumer’s pen has become life-threateningly ridiculous.

Here’s something you may have noticed about how Republicans react when they don’t have the votes for something: They don’t give a flying death panel about votes.

They care about story.

Politics is storytelling, and the stories that Republicans tell are highly successful and have loads of fans. There's the story of a health care system that robbed from the “makers” to give to the “takers” and put the government in charge of your physical well-being. There's the story of a heartless, anti-American corporate shill who slept soundly while Americans were being killed in a middle-sized city in North Africa. Anybody remember its name?

Half the country came to believe those stories and lots of similarly dubious other stories. The fact that they were 110 percent steaming bot-crap didn’t matter in the slightest.

Yes, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, but in case you haven't noticed, she is not president today. Yes, the Affordable Care Act is still (barely) hanging on, but the story of its diabolical concoction at the hands of a Muslim socialist helped elect Donald Trump and continues to help sustain his massive support among Republicans.

Even on their own terms, the terms of good-faith political horse-trading, the Democrats have been winning battles but losing wars like this for decades, from “ending welfare as we know it” to Bush v. Gore, to the public option that didn't happen with Obamacare. The Democrats’ knack for preemptive compromise on any and all issues hasn’t just let Republicans assert false counter-narratives, it has legitimized those narratives in a way that shut down future avenues for argument.

When Bill Clinton declared that the era of big government was over, when Obama proposed a stimulus half the size it needed to be, they breathed life into the cancerous nonsense at the heart of the conservative movement. Now, even with the cataclysmic results of this  allergy to fighting  sitting in the Oval Office, Democratic leaders have made sure that another looming conflict — this one over impeachment — will be twice as hard as it should have been.

In order to overcome that self-imposed disadvantage, Democrats need to get to work now, telling the story -- or the many stories -- of Trump ’s corruption, cruelty and incompetence, so that when (or if) the opportunity for impeachment finally presents itself, the necessary groundwork will have been laid.

While maybe a few dozen journalists and their most devoted readers might have anything approaching a comprehensive understanding of the extent of Trump ’s corruption, everyone in America knows The Story of the Witch Hunt — even if they don’t believe it. Schumer and Pelosi have let the White House and the GOP craft, repeat and refine a baroque and possibly democracy-destroying lie, all for the possibility of . . . what exactly? Susan Collins' vote against the confirmation of a sure-to-be-revanchist Supreme Court nominee whom Schumer shouldn’t even let come to the floor in the first place?

I mean, I get it. Part of me can’t help but admire the Democrats’ faith — as unshakable as the Republicans’ belief in the free market — in the wonk market, in the hidden moral hand that guides political compromise. Yet by continuing to insist on its honorable, musty tenets -- by respecting the other side’s point of view, taking their word at face value, upholding norms — liberals are putting their faith in a thoroughly obsolete set of conventions that only worked when they were practiced in the context of an agreed-upon reality.

Modern conservatives re-concoct a new reality for themselves every day. It’s not horse-trading when the other side is offering unicorns. When Democrats refuse to challenge Republican delusions and lies , whether about MS-13 or the Russia investigation "witch hunt,” they help give body and shape — the weight of reality — to insidious fantasy.

Yet Democratic leaders seem determined to keep on taking the Republicans seriously and clamming up about impeachment in the hopes that it will earn them some undefined political capital at some unnamed point in the vague and misty future, despite the toll that strategy has taken on their stated agenda and the country. As a full-fledged authoritarian assault is being made on our system, Schumer and Pelosi, rather than taking measures to stop it, lecture the party’s most fearsome fighters on the  value of civility  and scold its base about how things “really work” in Washington.

Republicans, on the other hand, know that the way things really work is that volume and repetition can make anything true. Anything. The Russia investigation is a witch hunt. The  deficit is going down.  The press is the enemy of the people.

An April  poll by Monmouth University  found that 77 percent of Americans believe that major news outlets regularly report "fake news.” How can that be? How can so many people believe a lie? At least one answer is: What choice do they have? What equally vivid, galvanizing assertions of honest-to-God truth have been articulated as often and as loudly by Democrats?

Democrats need to talk about impeachment. The story of why Trump  should be impeached is the story of the greatest con in American history, one that, if Democrats are not working tirelessly to expose, they are aiding and abetting. They need to call a lie a lie and a grift a grift — quickly, forcefully and repeatedly. They need to articulate a clear, resounding vision in powerfully symbolic language, every day, and connect the dots between that vision and the effect it has on real people’s lives.

Democrats need to fight the good fight, even for causes that might seem lost, and especially for the most urgent cause of all: salvaging our democracy. There’s more at stake than just an election.



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    6 years ago

Trumpsters aid and abet this travesty. We see that here every day.  A third of the country (die hard trumpsters) is acting against the best interests of the country and must be defeated. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    6 years ago

You're funny JR. I can feel your anger and frustration. Hang in there, only six and half years to go. Giggle

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    6 years ago

You're the one who has to self-justify supporting this asshole, not me. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    6 years ago

I justify it and then some...best president ever. la de da

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.1.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    6 years ago

You wish.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.1.4  bugsy  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.1.3    6 years ago
You wish

Ooooooooo,,"you wish"....I thin I last said that 40 years ago when I was 13.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @1    6 years ago

Win. Some. Elections. And. Change. Things. Then.

President Trump--OUR President--can be impeached----just as soon as you think you have some PROOF of what HE DID ILLEGALLY.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
1.3  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  JohnRussell @1    6 years ago

well this should be interesting.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.4  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    6 years ago

For what? You know what my challenge is so maybe you can show your proof here...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  bugsy @1.4    6 years ago

You know what my challenge is

You face many challenges. I hope you can overcome some of them. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.4.2  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.1    6 years ago

I think many of conservative posters on here challenge is to show you how wrong you are on so many levels.

I wish you would finally admit that the only reason you hate Trump is that he is not named Hillary. That will get alot off your chest.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Quiet
2  96WS6    6 years ago

Deleted

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.2  Cerenkov  replied to  96WS6 @2    6 years ago

Let them tilt at windmills while we get things done.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  96WS6 @2    6 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3    6 years ago

Removed for context

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.3.2  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3    6 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Quiet
3  mocowgirl    6 years ago

When Bill Clinton declared that the era of big government was over, 

Uh, Clinton downsized government by privatization.

The Reagan Years: Privatization’s Coming out Party

Ronald Reagan’s 1980 election was the opportunity conservatives hoped for to downsize government and privatize public services. Reagan didn’t run on an explicit privatization platform, but he embraced the idea as central to his agenda once elected. The administration began to develop concrete proposals to sell off government assets. He also gave privatization a rhetorical lift by adopting the term “privatization” (still unfamiliar at that time) and softened opposition with Friedman’s argument that it simply represented using private means to pursue public goals.

By his second term Reagan had made privatization a centerpiece of his agenda.

The Clinton years – From Idea to Institutionalization

President George H. W. Bush, a more foreign policy-focused president, didn’t maintain Reagan’s drive for privatization. Vice President Dan Quayle led the administration’s Council on Competitiveness but didn’t make much progress. Bush’s one significant privatization-related action in the final year of his presidency was to sign an executive order that would make it easier for states and cities to sell or lease public facilities such as housing projects, roads, or sewage treatment plans built with federal money. The order, though, didn’t launch a sell-off of public assets.

President Clinton, the New Democrat, had warmer attitudes towards the role of government but followed the Reagan-Bush direction of smaller government.

In fact, Clinton succeeded where Reagan and Bush failed. Writing in 1997, the Heritage Foundation’s Ron Utt (who had been Reagan’s “privatization czar”) praised Clinton for pursuing “the boldest privatization agenda put forth by any American president to date,” and noted that his proposals were “virtually all drawn from recommendations made in 1988 by President Reagan’s Commission on Privatization.” In 2006 Reason Foundation’s Robert Poole declared that “the Clinton administration’s privatization successes exceeded those of Reagan.”

But the 1996 Welfare Reform law supercharged privatization. The law removed restrictions that prohibited states from contracting out welfare intake and eligibility in what the Washington Post described as potentially “the largest transfers of public sector operations into private hands.”

Large corporations including EDS, IBM, Lockheed, and a subsidiary of Arthur Anderson and Co. saw welfare reform as a lucrative new market that promised to become a “multi-billion dollar enterprise.”

The law represented a significant shift in the history of privatization. The contractors weren’t simply managing public services. They would make important public decisions – helping to determine which Americans received welfare and under what circumstances.

Texas and Wisconsin moved quickly to privatize their welfare intake programs. Texas Gov. George W. Bush wanted to go further than the law permitted and contract out eligibility screenings beyond welfare to other programs such as food stamps and Medicaid — a lucrative $2.8 billion, seven-year contract. The Clinton administration, after 9 months, showed restraint and ruled that the outsourcing of food stamp and Medicaid eligibility review were not allowed under federal law.

In the end, Maximus, Inc., a “small” company with only $100 million in government contracts, got the Wisconsin contract and Ross Perot’s EDS got the initial Texas contract. Maximus is now one of the largest for-profit managers of public social services across in the country today.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4  charger 383    6 years ago

Pence becoming President should be enough to stop any thought of impeaching Trump

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1  Snuffy  replied to  charger 383 @4    6 years ago

Doh!!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    6 years ago

This should be in the onion.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
6  bbl-1    6 years ago

Trump will do the 'impeachment work' himself. 

It is coming.  The flim flam man is out of his league.  He believes he's a member of 'the club' except he never paid his dues and those dues would not be accepted anyway.

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
7  lennylynx    6 years ago

There is one criticism the right likes to make about the left that I agree with 100 percent; they're wimps.  The Benghazi! 'investigations' were treated as legitimate when there was nothing, absolutely NOTHING that even remotely suggested ANY wrongdoing.  The farce was allowed to drag on, and on, and on.  Where was the outrage?  It's LONG past time to take the gloves off, but I guess the Democrats are still worried about breaking a nail!  Pathetic cowards who stand idly by while the corporate thugs run amok. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1  Texan1211  replied to  lennylynx @7    6 years ago

Gee, this is about old Benghazi investigations?

I must have slipped into the wrong seed!

Careful------some MIGHT consider this off topic, but you being who you are, probably not!

 
 

Who is online


devangelical
bugsy
Greg Jones
Sparty On


92 visitors