╌>

Conservatives and FOX News Under Attack

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  make-america-great-again  •  5 years ago  •  116 comments

Conservatives and FOX News Under Attack
First, Fox News is behind us, as they have been since the very first day. Toughness is a rare quality in a TV network, and we are grateful for that. Second, we’ve always apologized when we are wrong and we will continue to do that. That’s what decent people do — they apologize, But we will never bow to the mob — ever. No matter what.”

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


When FOX News first appeared on the scene they were an alternative to the liberal mainstream media consisting of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and  Washington Post all who were one sided to the left. Fox showed you the other side and showed you things the mainstream media didn’t want you to see. Slowly over the years after Roger Ailes died and Rupert Murdoch turned control over to his two very liberal sons, things started changing. At first they were fair and balanced as they said with having both sides referenced and more conservative than the other stations, but lately they have become more and more liberal and just like the other stations.

We watched Shep Smith go to the Left of Hugo Chavez. We listened to hours of garbage pointless manipulated talking points from anti-Trump former colonels and many other grifters who shill their books. But it’s time to wake up to what Fox News is doing. They are not on the American people’s side.

Fox News was a hot topic of discussion this week after the radical Left and their Muslim Brotherhood counterparts decided to carry out their own form of jihad against Judge Jeanine Pirro, one of Fox News’s most popular hosts. On Saturday evening during her opening statement, Pirro sparked controversy after she logically questioned whether or not Ilhan Omar’s use of the hijab suggests that she is in favor of Sharia Law.


(


“She’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democrat party. So if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from? Think about it,” Pirro said. “Omar wears a hijab, which, according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?” Pirro said.

Pirro has not apologized for her remarks, but defended her position in a statement on Monday. “I’ve seen a lot of comments about my opening statement from Saturday night’s show and I did not call Rep. Omar un-American,” she said. “My intention was to ask a question and start a debate, but of course because one is Muslim does not mean you don’t support the Constitution. I invite Rep. Omar to come on my show any time to discuss all of the important issues facing America today.”

The Murdoch-owned Fox News network has decided to shelve Judge Jeanine Pirro’s television show this week, after Pirro questioned Islam’s compatibility with the U.S. Constitution in a segment on Democrat congresswoman Ilhan Omar, an avowed anti-Semite.

Variety reports:  “Fox News Channel replaced tonight’s broadcast of Jeanine Pirro’s weekly program with a repeat episode of its documentary series “Scandalous,” just days after the 21st Century Fox-owned cable-news network said it condemned remarks the outspoken host made about Minnesota Democrat Ihan Omar.”


(


Fox News did not choose to provide an explanation to Variety for their report. This should tell you everything you need to know about the Fox News corporation.

In case you were wondering whether or not wearing an hijab means one is pro-Sharia, the answer is yes.

According to Islamic law, devout Muslim women are to cover themselves, or face punishment for violations of Sharia Law.

But Trump urged Fox News to reinstate Pirro, whom he’s personally known for years. “Fox must stay strong and fight back with vigor. Stop working soooo hard on being politically correct, which will only bring you down,” Trump wrote Sunday.

He added: “Stay true to the people to the people that got you there. Keep fighting for Tucker, and fight hard for  @JudgeJeanine

pirro-trump.jpg

Here is reporter   Laura Loomer’s incredible article for Big League Politics  the other day regarding the Pirro controversy. Maybe Fox News doesn’t care, but a whole lot of conservatives and independents out there do.

Loomer writes: “We do not negotiate with terrorists” used to be a unanimous position held by both sides of the political arena in America, but sadly, Fox News is objecting and has indeed negotiated with terrorists in their crusade against free speech and honest dialogue about Islam in America.

Despite the claims of many Muslim women that it is “their choice” to wear a hijab, the truth of the matter is that according to Sharia —the “Sacred Path of Islam”, wearing head coverings for women is  “Obligatory” in most of the Muslim world.”

In Chapter “w” Section 23 of “Reliance of the Traveller”—the sharia manual for Muslims, it states that the hijab is obligatory under Sharia. “A woman must not reveal anything except her hands and her face when outside the home and on the street.”

In other words, Pirro was speaking the truth and nothing but the truth.

Following the segment, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) wrote a letter to Fox News, calling for  Pirro to be fired  for what they called “Islamophobia”.

But, what is Islamophobia? It’s the biggest hoax ever created. It’s a tool used by jihadis in suits to further their process of civilization jihad and subversion as outlined in the “Explanatory Memorandum”, the Muslim Brotherhood’s blueprint for an Islamic takeover in the United States.

From the  Explanatory Memorandum — the Muslim Brotherhood in America in its own words:

“The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Judge Jeanine is a patriot who often spoke against radical Islam or the communist conspiracy in our social network.  As you have observed, the Murdoch family are not or ever has been conservative or pro GOP.  The only reason they featured more conservatives than leftists is because of RATINGS and they scored big for several decades.  It was congress getting rid of the socialist FAIRNESS DOCTRINE in 1988 that gave rise to Rush Limbaugh, and other conservatives on radio and TV.  Finally, FOX is part of the FCC approved networks, not much different than ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, PBS, NPR, etc. and the FOX network has the same advertisers as the conspiratorial leftist networks.

Judge Jeanine was absolutely right in what she was saying about this Muslim traitor IIhan Omar. FOX is defending this Muslim traitor in our government whose a puppet for the Islamic takeover of the United States.

Judge Jeanine is just the latest in a movement to shut out all conservative commentary. The left is  going after Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity too.

The left has been after Tucker Carlson for some time now. First last year demonstrating outside his home when he wasn’t there, but his family was thus terrifying his wife and kids. The police said they couldn’t do anything unless property was destroyed or someone was hurt.

Now the left is going after Carlson for something he said against women 10 years ago on some shock jock’s program so they are going after him by getting sponsors to boycott his show. Supporters of Carlson are boycotting the sponsors.

Tucker responded in his monologue saying , Since the day we went on the air, they’ve been working hard to kill this show. We haven’t said much about it in public; it seemed too self- referential. The point of this show has never been us. But now, it’s obvious to everybody. There is no pretending that it is not happening. It is happening, and so, going forward, we’ll be covering their efforts to make us be quiet.

For now, though, just two points to leave you with. First, Fox News is behind us, as they have been since the very first day. Toughness is a rare quality in a TV network, and we are grateful for that. Second, we’ve always apologized when we are wrong and we will continue to do that. That’s what decent people do — they apologize,

But we will never bow to the mob — ever. No matter what.”

tucker-carlsen.jpg

I’m not so sure FOX is behind Tucker as he says since they pulled Judge Jeanine’s show this week-end bowing to Muslim pressure groups.

Sean Hannity is another FOX personality the left is going after.

seanhannity.jpg

Representative Brad Sherman, a Califronia Democratic, said that Hannity and fellow Fox star Laura Ingraham represent—or direct—an important strain of public opinion, which should inform whether impeachment proceedings can begin.

.“We won’t actually remove this president until Sean Hannity calls for us to remove this president. Or until Laura Ingraham [does],” he said, according to  The New York Times . He warned that impeachment would not be feasible “until we drive home our message, change public opinion and develop more facts.”

Former Obama administration staffers Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett and Tommy Vietor, who are the hosts of the wildly popular ‘Pod Save America’ podcast, promoted a Media Matters protest outside of Fox News’ Manhattan headquarters to ramp up the pressure on the network to fire Carlson.

“They’re having a protest outside of Fox News headquarters on Wednesday at 11 a.m. in New York because Fox is having an emergency meeting with their advertisers,” Vietor told the audience.

“So if you want to send a message, and you want people to actually care there, let the advertisers know because that’s the only reason the Bill O’Reillys and the Laura [Ingrahams] and the other people actually get punished.”

“And the Glenn Becks too. It’s the only thing that’s worked,” Lovett chimed in.

Vietor, Favreau, and Lovett speak for the Obama world.The professional left is now getting in on the act of trying to shut down Carlson’s show. If they succeed in claiming his scalp, they will not stop with Carlson.

Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Judge Jeanine Pirro will be the next targets.

The attack on conservatives doesn’t end with just FOX News. Twitter and Facebook are also censoring conservatives.

Recently the political censorship social media platform known as Twitter, conducted a late night sneak attack of Conservative accounts. The attack occurred sometime late Tuesday night or Wednesday morning. Conservative users discovered that their accounts had been locked and/or they had lost hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of followers all at once.

This attack on Conservatives, which is being identified by the hashtag #TwitterLockOut, is further evidence of Twitter’s obvious efforts to censor accounts on the basis of political content. This is fundamentally un-American.

Facebook has also been accused of censoring conservative news sites. Facebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network’s influential “trending” news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project. This individual says that workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing in the highly-influential section, even though they were organically trending among the site’s users.

If the Facebook Trending curation guidelines released to  The Guardian  were   accurate and legitimate, the documents in no way supported claims Facebook was suppressing “conservative news.” The guidelines as issued simply delineated “best practices” in ensuring that information pushed out via Facebook’s powerful platform remained accurate and credible, filtering out sources that might favor rumor or misinformation over credible reporting.

According to  Gizmodo , “several former Facebook ‘news curators’” manipulated the flow of conservative information on the social network (for largely unexplained reasons).

A Gateway Pundit June study of top conservative news outlets found that facebook has eliminated 93%of top traffic to conservative websites.

The left’s goal is not to eliminate “hate” from the airwaves. Their objective is to cleanse the media of any opposition to their agenda.The left obviously doesn’t want any other opinions but their own  just like the old leftist/ communist Soviet Union.

i-am-a-conservative-800.jpg


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    5 years ago

“Vietor, Favreau, and Lovett speak for the Obama world.The professional left is now getting in on the act of trying to shut down Carlson’s show. If they succeed in claiming his scalp, they will not stop with Carlson.

Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Judge Jeanine Pirro will be the next targets.

The attack on conservatives doesn’t end with just FOX News. Twitter and Facebook are also censoring conservatives.

Recently the political censorship social media platform known as Twitter, conducted a late night sneak attack of Conservative accounts. The attack occurred sometime late Tuesday night or Wednesday morning. Conservative users discovered that their accounts had been locked and/or they had lost hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of followers all at once.

This attack on Conservatives, which is being identified by the hashtag #TwitterLockOut, is further evidence of Twitter’s obvious efforts to censor accounts on the basis of political content. This is fundamentally un-American.

Facebook has also been accused of censoring conservative news sites. Facebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network’s influential “trending” news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project. This individual says that workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing in the highly-influential section, even though they were organically trending among the site’s users.

If the Facebook Trending curation guidelines released to The Guardian were accurate and legitimate, the documents in no way supported claims Facebook was suppressing “conservative news.” The guidelines as issued simply delineated “best practices” in ensuring that information pushed out via Facebook’s powerful platform remained accurate and credible, filtering out sources that might favor rumor or misinformation over credible reporting.

According to Gizmodo, “several former Facebook ‘news curators’” manipulated the flow of conservative information on the social network (for largely unexplained reasons).

A Gateway Pundit June study of top conservative news outlets found that facebook has eliminated 93%of top traffic to conservative websites.

The left’s goal is not to eliminate “hate” from the airwaves. Their objective is to cleanse the media of any opposition to their agenda.”

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    5 years ago

How is it that Fux 'news' and 'conservatives' are under attack?

 
 
 
Don Overton
Sophomore Quiet
1.3  Don Overton  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    5 years ago

Good, it's about time that the liars and cleared from the media

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    5 years ago

Fox News has unrepentant racist sexists to purge including Carlson and Pirro.

Carlson was already fired by CNN and MSNBC. Fox hired the no good losers...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @2    5 years ago

Fox needs to repent for absolutely nothing and it needs to retain both of them.  Fox News is the most trusted name in news and is the most fair and balanced. The MSM and their fact checkers and the social media on line are all fake news. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    5 years ago
'Fox News is the most trusted name in news and is the most fair and balanced.'

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    5 years ago

Um, no they are not

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @2.1.2    5 years ago

Actually, yes, they are.  

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
2.1.4  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.3    5 years ago

No they are not

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.3    5 years ago

Actually,  no, they are not.  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1.6  JBB  replied to  lady in black @2.1.4    5 years ago

This article and the many others like it XX are all just bullshit piled on bullshit piled on bullshit. Is Fox New under attack? He'll No! Butt, They ShouldGbe if we care one bit anymore about truth justice and the American Way. Have you noticed an effort rlund here to silence anyone? I have. The SPLC, ADL, ACLU and even the Humane Society. When there is nobody left to call foul. When there is nobody defending truth or justice. When real freedom to decry hate is gone. Cockroaches, MAGA Hatters and Fox News WILL PREVAIL... 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.1.7  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.5    5 years ago

About as much as CNN is...jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @2    5 years ago
'Carlson was already fired by CNN and MSNBC. Fox hired the no good losers...'

Where all the bigot 'conservatives' go after everyone else kicks their loser asses down the road.  Fux 'news'

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
2.2.1  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @2.2    5 years ago
Where all the bigot 'conservatives' go

So Donna Brazille is a conservative bigot? Huh....who woulda thunk.

Only a liberal that hates anyone and everyone that does not toe the loony liberal line.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  bugsy @2.2.1    5 years ago

There are a bunch of liberal contributors who have air time on FNC.  More liberals there than conservatives at CNN or MSNBC.  

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     5 years ago

Poor Fox standing all alone 

Whose fault is that ? 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1  Tessylo  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3    5 years ago

Hi Steve!  Good to see you!  Hope you are well

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
3.1.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  Tessylo @3.1    5 years ago

Thanks Tessylo I'm doing well. I got bored being retired so I went back to work got ta keep active ya know. So, Busy busy lol and tired too, I'm working with a bunch of 20 and 30 year olds.  I'm 61. That about says it all...LOL 

I see you're still fighting the power that is. Unfortunately I think most of trump's followers wouldn't even listen to trump himself if he said "I'm really just a shyster and no good for America", they just wouldn't and couldn't believe that about their idol.

Some people never saw the flaws in Obama either but it seems this guy is like a cult leader or worse... and he's the damn president.. jrSmiley_55_smiley_image.gif

Good Luck to the republicans they own this mess lock, stock and barrel. 

Good Luck to America as well, I live here.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3.1.1    5 years ago

Glad to hear it Steve.  Good to see your face around the place.  

'Unfortunately I think most of trump's followers wouldn't even listen to trump himself if he said "I'm really just a shyster and no good for America", they just wouldn't and couldn't believe that about their idol.'

They believe it, they just don't give a shit!  As long as liberals/progressives/democrats are getting screwed (his supporters too) they're happy.  Sad.

'Good Luck to the republicans they own this mess lock, stock and barrel.'  True dat!  Unbelievable though how everything is blamed on everyone else except Rump, the 'conservatives' and the whole Rump administration - a bunch of gangsters, crooks, grifters, thieves, scum.   

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3.1.1    5 years ago

So the democrat house means nothing now?  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3    5 years ago

Fox serves the needs of the American people instead of the liberal media establishment.  They are our champions for truth.  

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.2.1  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2    5 years ago

Alternative truth

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
3.2.2  It Is ME  replied to  lady in black @3.2.1    5 years ago
Alternative truth

As told by CNN, NBC, MSNBC....etc ?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.2    5 years ago

Those be the fake news sources.  Breitbart and CNS are the very best news sources.  

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.2.4  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.3    5 years ago

More alternative news sites.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
3.2.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2    5 years ago
Fox serves the needs of the Conservative American people instead of the liberal media establishment

So, we're all not alike.

They are our champions for truth.  

I prefer to get my truth from a variety of news sources. It seems each one is somewhat bias including Fox. Somewhere in the middle is usually where the truth lives.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
3.2.6  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3.2.5    5 years ago
Somewhere in the middle is usually where the truth lives.

Now.....where can we actually "FIND" that source ?

"News" ….. is now commentary and Opinion !

Maybe "VICE LIVE" will give us actual news ?

jrEmbed module="jrYouTube" youtube_id="0Gr58B7wRnw"]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  It Is ME @3.2.6    5 years ago

Breitbart is where the truth is.  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.2.8  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.7    5 years ago

Yeah, and down is up and black is white and evil is good per you...

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Participates
3.2.9  katrix  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.7    5 years ago
Breitbart is where the truth is.

That's an even more dishonest comment than your comment about Fox being the dictionary definition of veracity.

But it does explain a lot - people who limit their sources of "news" to conspiracy theorist sites like Breitbart can't be expected to have any actual knowledge.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.10  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @3.2.4    5 years ago

The more “alternative” the better.  The closest to the edge of the censoring board the better and more likely to use.  The over the edge ones are the best

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.2.11  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.10    5 years ago

Of course you listen to alternative facts, not real facts.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.2.12  evilone  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.7    5 years ago
Breitbart is where the truth is.  

A lie.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2.13  Trout Giggles  replied to  evilone @3.2.12    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.14  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @3.2.11    5 years ago

It is the msm that deals in alternative facts.   The alternative media deals with reality.  

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.2.15  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.14    5 years ago

Nope, fox news is the alternative fact "news" station

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     5 years ago

It's another war on Christmas.....

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4    5 years ago

Not quite the same but just as real

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1    5 years ago

Living in a mythical kingdom has no basis in reality either.......

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.1    5 years ago

You have experience with that?  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.2    5 years ago
You have experience with that?  

Sure do, when I take the grand kids and great grand kids to Disney. You, on the other hand, live it daily based on your articles and comments on a non existent state.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.3    5 years ago

A state is not a kingdom.  We in Jefferson are stil part of an exceptional America.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.3    5 years ago

A state is not a kingdom.  We in Jefferson are stil part of an exceptional America.  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.6  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.5    5 years ago
A state is not a kingdom.  We in Jefferson are stil part of an exceptional America.  

Sure it is, it's a mythical kingdom that doesn't exist...The reason that your part of an exceptional American is because you live in California...

Deal with it...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.7  Kavika   replied to  Kavika @4.1.6    5 years ago

You should stop bumping up your article. My comment was made to you two days ago...LOLOLOL

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.8  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.7    5 years ago

Well I still have a life...Also, I was responding to your post and all heck will freeze over before you taking a shot at me and the aspirations of the people where I live will be the last word on any of my seeds.  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.9  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.8    5 years ago
Well I still have a life...

Funny, you've been on NT numerous times in that two day period but it took you that long to comment...LMAO

and the aspirations of a FEW of the people where I live

There fixed it for you.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.10  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.6    5 years ago

Californication is a net negative for America.  There is nothing positive about it’s coastal urban population.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.10    5 years ago

I think a lot of 'Californians' would beg to differ

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.12  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.10    5 years ago

Brilliant comment, you should have posted in crayon, that would appeal to your base...

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
4.1.13  livefreeordie  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.11    5 years ago

I and many of my friends gave up on Stalinist Kalifornia and moved out.  It is a cesspool that is not salvageable 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.14  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.9    5 years ago

Sabotaging another members posts by trying to twist them does nothing except reflect negatively on the personal moral character of the one doing so no matter who does it to whom. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.15  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.11    5 years ago

Those who do need to accept who it is that is our President.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.16  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  livefreeordie @4.1.13    5 years ago

You are largely correct.  There are inland portions of the state from Oregon to The south end of Riverside county that are not the cesspool that the progressive urban coast and most but not all of its population clearly are.  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.17  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.14    5 years ago
Sabotaging another members posts by trying to twist them does nothing except reflect negatively on the personal moral character of the one doing so no matter who does it to whom. 

Sabotaging!!!!  LOLOL, read you own comments. My moral character is just fine, but after reading some of your articles and comments it brings yours into question. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.1.18  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.16    5 years ago

Someone that lives in the mythical shit hole of Jeffersonia should not be calling any other part of the state or country a cesspool...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.19  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.17    5 years ago

Quoting someone and then substituting your words for theirs is exactly that.  It is not a moral act. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.20  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @4.1.18    5 years ago

https://www.shastacascade.com/visitor-guideThe rest just wishes they could be a part of this. http://s3.amazonaws.com/document.issuu.com/190305201307-7b7964585b1cc3d8fc8c1f4b9fa41850/original.file?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIAOLWUHJLJAFRLXA&Expires=1553384097&Signature=MStTWvwhCfsnGgZ7Y0oHPeD2BRE%3D

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
5  evilone    5 years ago

Poor Fox & friends. How will they manage to survive? Poor poor alt+right bigots can't make any friends. /s

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1  Tessylo  replied to  evilone @5    5 years ago
'Poor Fox & friends. How will they manage to survive? Poor poor alt+right bigots can't make any friends. /s'

Just like the scum in D.C. in the gop administration.  They wonder why they can't get any dates?  Like Steve Miller.  Puke!  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1    5 years ago

It’s more like when Christians try to defend the right to express our beliefs on a social media site in a calm, loving, and rational manner and get maltreated by the fascist biased bigots that run google and the like. It’s ok for secularists and progressives there to demonetize and discriminate while their like minded can freely bash our beliefs to their evil hearts content.  Google needs to be fair to conservatives and to Bible believing Christians.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.1    5 years ago
'It’s more like when Christians try to defend the right to express our beliefs on a social media site in a calm, loving, and rational manner'

fascist biased bigots 

Don't you mean 'christian' dominionists'?  

I've yet to see proof of that - the christian dominionists doing anything in a calm, loving, and rational manner.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.1    5 years ago

Still think Christians have been pushed back into the dark?

I saw a bunch of them standing in the middle of the street the other day with their signs about Jesus and such. I didn't see anyone harassing them or the police throwing them in a van

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.2    5 years ago

There are very few Christian doninionists and they have no power at all. mainstream evangelical Christians are not dominionists and in fact do speak and act in a calm, rational, and loving 🥰 manner toward all people.   

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1.3    5 years ago

Probably not in the very fine area that you have chosen to live.  If we did that in San Francisco or the people’s republic of Berzerkely then the harassment would commence.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  evilone @5    5 years ago

Google and You Tube are alt left bigots and haters just like the SPLC.  

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
5.2.1  evilone  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2    5 years ago
Google and You Tube are alt left bigots and haters just like the SPLC.  

Shining a light into the dark pits of the alt+right exposes them as the cockroaches they really are. Trying to soften bigoted, racist and misogynistic rhetoric using slick talking heads like Tucker Carlson can only work for so long before a just society to take notice and reject it. It only takes a few alt+right members like Cesar Sayoc and Richard Spencer for that to happen. 

There are rumors that Lachlan Murdoch doesn't like Trump and is working to add more balance to the opinion side of Fox News. They realize to make money and keep people watching they will have to appeal to a little bit broader demographic of people than the 17% that make up the alt+right.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  evilone @5.2.1    5 years ago
'Shining a light into the dark pits of the alt+right exposes them as the cockroaches they really are. Trying to soften bigoted, racist and misogynistic rhetoric using slick talking heads like Tucker Carlson can only work for so long before a just society to take notice and reject it. It only takes a few alt+right members like Cesar Sayoc and Richard Spencer for that to happen.'

That scum bag Rump supporter is on trial right now.  Crying.  Typical snowflake.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.2.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.2.2    5 years ago

shine a light on this: https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/22/splc-richard-cohen-resigns/

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.2.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  evilone @5.2.1    5 years ago

It seems that it is the SPLC that has been exposed as a criminal sham organization scamming its true believers out of their money with their faux hate lists while they discriminate against minorities as abuse women.  They are the hate that they falsely accuse others of.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    5 years ago
In case you were wondering whether or not wearing an hijab means one is pro-Sharia, the answer is yes. According to Islamic law, devout Muslim women are to cover themselves, or face punishment for violations of Sharia Law.

This is the kind of illogical, dishonest, stupid, nonsense that is damaging America and making previously normal heartland conservatives into idiots. 

Wearing a hajib does not mean one is pro-sharia. It does mean that the woman is pro-identifying herself as a Muslim.

Muslims are 2 or at the most 3 percent of the US population. Sharia law is literally a non factor in American life. Besides that it is largely unconstitutional. It's not going to happen. 

Fear of sharia law in the US IS Islamophobia. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
7.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @7    5 years ago

No it is not.  Fear of sharia law being established in places in the USA 🇺🇸 is real and 100% completely justifiable.  There had already been activist courts that have struck down American laws banning the use of foreign law precedent in American jurisdiction because they ruled it was directed at preventing sharia law from being used in certain areas of the country.  We wish it were unconstitutional for the application of sharia law in any part of America for any reason.  

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
7.1.1  evilone  replied to  XXJefferson51 @7.1    5 years ago
Fear of sharia law being established in places in the USA 🇺🇸 is real and 100% completely justifiable.

Please educate me, since you say it's 100% justifiable there must be some evidence of sharia law being established in places of the USA. I can find none in my searches. This should be easy.

There had already been activist courts that have struck down American laws banning the use of foreign law precedent in American jurisdiction because they ruled it was directed at preventing sharia law from being used in certain areas of the country.

This has nothing to do with establishing sharia law anywhere in the USA. Where in the US does sharia law prevent US Criminal or Civil Law from taking precedent? 

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Participates
8  katrix    5 years ago
Fear of sharia law being established in places in the USA 🇺🇸 is real and 100% completely justifiable

The royal we again?  It is unconstitutional, but that doesn't stop your royal we from trying to push your Christian dominion theology into our country, our laws, and our schools.  MASA - Make America Stupid Again - that's the Christian dominionist motto.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
8.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  katrix @8    5 years ago

Im not a dominionist.  Next?  

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
8.1.1  LynneA  replied to  XXJefferson51 @8.1    5 years ago

The mantra of Christianity being attacked is as fake as Judge Pirro being concerned about Sharia law.  All cable news channels provide spoon-fed POVs with lazy ass Americans lapping it up!  

All personalities hired and fired are business decisions made to increase the bottom line.  Nothing more, nothing less.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
8.1.2  It Is ME  replied to  LynneA @8.1.1    5 years ago
The mantra of Christianity being attacked is as fake

Then how is it....you ain't allowed to say one DAMN thing thing about "Muslims", as is said about Christians ?

Weird huh !jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
8.1.3  LynneA  replied to  It Is ME @8.1.2    5 years ago

Talking/discussing the Muslim faith in relationship to one's faith system, or lack thereof is always acceptable to me.  Casting a shadow over the garb worn, in Judge Pirro case, was not exploring faith issues.  Obviously Fox agreed and sent her packing.

I recall a time Southern Baptist women/girls couldn't wear slacks...that whole modesty thing 😉

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
8.1.4  It Is ME  replied to  LynneA @8.1.3    5 years ago
Casting a shadow over the garb worn, in Judge Pirro case, was not exploring faith issues.

Juan Williams was canned from NPR for saying "he had issues being on the same flight as a "Muslim".

Nothing about their "religion", but just noting a "Feeling".

if he had said he had issues about being on a flight where someone wore a "Cross" around their neck, he'd still be at NPR !

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
8.1.5  LynneA  replied to  It Is ME @8.1.4    5 years ago

His statement was as ignorant as Pirro's question.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
8.1.6  It Is ME  replied to  LynneA @8.1.5    5 years ago
His statement was as ignorant as Pirro's question.

So a question is now considered ignorance ?

[deleted]

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
8.1.7  LynneA  replied to  It Is ME @8.1.6    5 years ago

Not a question...her question. 

While I didn't hear Juan's full commentary, based on what you provided, yes it appears ignorant.  Feelings without providing a knowledgeable baseline seems to fit the definition.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.1.8  Tessylo  replied to  LynneA @8.1.1    5 years ago
'is as fake as Judge Pirro being concerned about Sharia law'

That Rump supporter is off Fux 'news' for the second week in a row.  jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
8.1.9  It Is ME  replied to  LynneA @8.1.7    5 years ago
Not a question...her question.

A question is a question....no matter whom asks it !

Should a "question" not be put forth, if it's about "Muslims" ?

Christianity is "Questioned" ALL THE TIME !

is questioning the "Muslim' religion …. OUT OF BOUNDS" ?

 
 
 
LynneA
Freshman Silent
8.1.10  LynneA  replied to  It Is ME @8.1.9    5 years ago

In consideration of my first response 8.1.1 where do you want to go with this?  

You replied, I answered.

As a Christian, I'm not being attacked and reject the very premise espoused by my fellow sojourners.   People can question my faith, my POV any time and any where.  Not one seeking personal consensus.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
8.1.11  It Is ME  replied to  LynneA @8.1.10    5 years ago
As a Christian, I'm not being attacked

Christianity is supposed to look at the "big picture". Do you look at the "Big picture" ?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
8.1.12  It Is ME  replied to  It Is ME @8.1.6    5 years ago

I don't find Juan Williams to be ignorant !

Better ?

Even though the personal comment I responded to said this:

His statement was as ignorant as Pirro's question.

This fallacy that a statement can only be ignorant, but the individual that said it....isn't....is ridicules !

An "Ignorant " statement has to come from an "Individual" .....right. Their thought process....no one else's ! The "Scarecrow" actually does have a brain ?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
8.1.13  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  LynneA @8.1.1    5 years ago

People who share the Christian beliefs and values share and protect something very real to us.  There is nothing fake about our beliefs that are under attack by the secular world and msm.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
8.1.14  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  It Is ME @8.1.2    5 years ago

And Muslims don’t get accused of proselytizing when they explain their beliefs in defense against any attacks on their beliefs unlike evangelical Christians.  

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
9  luther28    5 years ago

When FOX News first appeared on the scene they were an alternative to the liberal mainstream media consisting of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and  Washington Post all who were one sided to the left

The only thing that Fox seems to have brought to the table as far as alternatives go is reality. While the mainstream media tends for the most part to deal in real world news, Fox has a tendency to broadcast from Bizarro World making it up as they go along.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
10  Veronica    5 years ago

God I miss the days when news was "real" and you could trust the newscasters.  Oh Walter where art thou?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
10.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Veronica @10    5 years ago

Never again will all Americans be subjugated to listening only to the ABC, CBS, NBC propaganda newsreaders like him reading the pages of the New York Times to us and calling it our national news.  Those days are forever and happily gone.  

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
11  Veronica    5 years ago

Any specifics on how conservatives, Fox News and Christians are under attack?  I mean specific, verifiable, fact based examples on how they are being attacked, not just an opinion.  Are conservatives being forced to abandon their views?  Are they still free to speak their views?  Is Fox News still on TV and as popular as ever?  Has anyone forced them to change their views?  Are Christians denied their Sunday services or do they have to do it in secret to avoid being dismissed from their job?  Are any of them "in the closet" because of their views?  Specific fact based verifiable examples, please.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
11.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Veronica @11    5 years ago

MBFC is a great example of anti conservative and anti Christian bias and bigotry in action.  

 
 

Who is online

Greg Jones
JohnRussell


104 visitors