Can US companies solve the Trump tariff problem by manufacturing in the US? It’s complicated.

  
Via:  bob-nelson  •  3 months ago  •  2 comments

Can US companies solve the Trump tariff problem by manufacturing in the US? It’s complicated.
Harley-Davidson CEO Matthew Levatich talked with Kara Swisher at Code about US manufacturing in the era of Trump — and trade wars.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Should United States companies just start making everything in the United States in light of President Donald Trump’s trade wars ? Harley-Davidson president and CEO Matthew Levatich says it’s complicated — but once you leave, it’s hard to come back.

“To me, innovation comes from know-how,” Levatich, who was named president and CEO of the Milwaukee-based company in 2015, told Recode’s Kara Swisher at the 2019 Code Conference in Scottsdale, Arizona, on Monday. “[Innovation] comes from the daily practice of doing something, and because you do something, you’re able to figure out how to do it better. And conversely, once you stop doing something, you no longer have the ability to be excellent at it, because you’re starting from scratch. And there are industries that have left the United States that would be difficult to resurrect here in the United States, certainly at scale.”

Levatich pointed to textiles, leather, and footwear as industries that left the US years ago and now probably can’t return easily. “Apparel is difficult to source at volume in the United States, because the know-how left decades ago, and you can’t snap your fingers and create it at scale,” he said.

When it comes to technology companies, the situation may be even more difficult. Trump, for example, has in the past called for Apple to do all of its manufacturing in the United States instead of China and demanded it “start building new plants now.” ( As Vox explained last year, making the iPhone in the US would be pretty complicated .)

original

Levatich also talked about that time Trump called out his company on Twitter

On Monday, Levatich also discussed the effects tariffs have had on Harley’s business, as well as President Trump’s public criticism of the company for the business measures it took to mitigate these tariff impacts. He said that Harley remains “heavily invested in American manufacturing” but acknowledged that Europe’s response, specifically, to the United States’ trade aggressions has been detrimental to the company.

“The EU’s response was a very specific retaliation toward Harley-Davidson, Levi’s, and bourbon,” he said.

Trump invited Harley executives and union representatives, including Levatich, to the White House in February 2017 and claimed Harley’s business would flourish under the Republican Party’s new policies on trade and taxes. And the company enjoyed the GOP tax bill, passed in December 2017, after which it announced $700 million in stock buybacks in February 2018.

But the tax cuts couldn’t fix everything at Harley — including in light of Trump’s approach to trade. Days before the stock buyback announcement, Harley announced plans to close a Kansas City factory.

And later that year, Harley said it would shift some of its production for its Europe-bound motorcycles overseas as a result of trade tensions between the US and Europe and Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership . Trump complained on Twitter about the decision.

original

Trump even suggested a Harley boycott.

original

Swisher asked Levatich what it was like to see a tweet from President Trump. “I wouldn’t say we expected it,” he said. “So yes, it was a surprise.”

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
Bob Nelson
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    3 months ago
On Monday, Levatich also discussed the effects tariffs have had on Harley’s business, as well as President Trump’s public criticism of the company for the business measures it took to mitigate these tariff impacts. He said that Harley remains “heavily invested in American manufacturing” but acknowledged that Europe’s response, specifically, to the United States’ trade aggressions has been detrimental to the company. “The EU’s response was a very specific retaliation toward Harley-Davidson, Levi’s, and bourbon,” he said.

The video is fascinating. Highly recommended to anyone who wants a good look at the real-world impact of tariffs.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
2  Nerm_L    3 months ago

“To me, innovation comes from know-how,” Levatich, who was named president and CEO of the Milwaukee-based company in 2015, told Recode’s Kara Swisher at the 2019 Code Conference in Scottsdale, Arizona, on Monday. “[Innovation] comes from the daily practice of doing something, and because you do something, you’re able to figure out how to do it better. And conversely, once you stop doing something, you no longer have the ability to be excellent at it, because you’re starting from scratch. And there are industries that have left the United States that would be difficult to resurrect here in the United States, certainly at scale.”

Matthew Levatich explains the adverse impact of free trade and globalization.  Tariffs are only a problem because capitalism is dead in the United States.  American capitalists have lost the ability to innovate.  At the beginning of the video Levatich brings out a model of an electric motorcycle.  Pay close attention, the company that developed the electric motorcycle was purchased.  That innovation came from a small startup business, it wasn't developed by an established global business like Harley-Davidson.  Global corporations have become an obstacle to innovation.

Levatich also explains how tariffs affect the foreign manufacturer.  The EU retaliatory tariffs was a problem for Harley-Davidson exporting into the EU.  Harley was concerned about retaining access and share of the European market.  Why doesn't US tariffs work the same way for Chinese manufacturers?  China is different because American capitalists have given up on the United States.  American capitalists have stopped producing and innovating; it's just too hard to start doing that again in the United States.  China has the United States by the short hairs.

Of course, moving the jobs out of the United States did require starting from scratch.  Moving production out of the United States required building factories in foreign countries and training a foreign labor force.  So, in the end, Matthew Levatich is just another supply-side, free trade liar.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


al Jizzerror
Ozzwald
Just Jim NC TttH
KDMichigan
Tessylo
jungkonservativ111
Freedom Warrior
Vic Eldred
Paula Bartholomew
Dulay





JaneDoe
arkpdx


50 visitors