Acosta said: "We live in a very different world."

  
Via:  john-russell  •  one month ago  •  11 comments

Acosta said: "We live in a very different world."
Sex trafficking was a crime in 2007. Rape was a crime in 2007. F***ing kids was a crime in 2007. What is #Acosta talking about?

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Victoria Brownworth  🏳️‍🌈Retweeted Adam Klasfeld


Sex trafficking was a crime in 2007. Rape was a crime in 2007. F***ing kids was a crime in 2007. What is #Acosta talking about?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



k8dXdUqV_bigger.jpgAdam KlasfeldVerified account @KlasfeldReports

FollowFollow @KlasfeldReports





More






Q: Would you make this same agreement today?

A: With "knowledge and hindsight," Acosta said: "We live in a very different world."



11:59 AM - 10 Jul 2019


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
Find text within the comments Find 
 
JohnRussell
1  seeder  JohnRussell    one month ago
Acosta suggested that what was a good deal at time was being looked at differently today, but also said that “facts are being overlooked.”

“Times have changed, and coverage of this case has certainly changed, ” Acosta said.

Acosta said that the deal he reached as Miami’s top federal prosecutor guaranteed that Epstein would do jail time on a state charge, be forced to register as a sex offender, and offered the financier’s victims a chance to obtain money damages.

“There was value to getting a guilty plea and having him register,” Acosta said. “The world needed to be on notice that he was a sexual predator.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/10/labor-secretary-alex-acosta-holds-press-conference-on-jeffrey-epstein.html
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1    one month ago

The facts that are being overlooked are these:

“Simply put, the Palm Beach state attorney’s office was ready to let Epstein walk free, no jail time,”

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2  seeder  JohnRussell    one month ago

Acosta seemed to be suggesting that prior to the "Me Too" movement it would have been pointless to go all out to prove this sort of sex crime because the victims would not be believed. 

2007 was not 1907. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3  Vic Eldred    one month ago

The question is does that press conference save him?

 
 
 
Snuffy
3.1  Snuffy  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    one month ago

Isn't the DOJ now reviewing that decision?  I'll leave it there until there is a public dissemination of the facts that we just don't have access to right now.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Snuffy @3.1    one month ago
Isn't the DOJ now reviewing that decision?

That they are. 

I'll leave it there

Why?  We have a monster sexual predator to discuss, yet we seem to be fixated on the deal Acosta arranged long ago. Have you thought about that?

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    one month ago

Yup Rump and Epstein are monster sexual predators.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
4  Sean Treacy    one month ago

Acosta is terrible.  The sooner he's gone, the better.

 
 
 
livefreeordie
5  livefreeordie    one month ago

If the Dems are so upset with this, why didn't the Obama DOJ pursue this during Obama's 8 years?

 
 
 
Tessylo
5.1  Tessylo  replied to  livefreeordie @5    one month ago

Why would they?  This has absolutely nothing to do with the Obama administration 

 
 
 
livefreeordie
5.1.1  livefreeordie  replied to  Tessylo @5.1    one month ago

you leftists are complaining about Epstein being free these past 10 years and that the DOJ should investigate.  

That brings a logical question why no one in the Obama DOJ cared about this?  

We know the answer- Epstein was a major donor to liberal Democrats

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



Kavika
loki12
cjcold
Dean Moriarty
igknorantzrulz
devangelical


143 visitors