╌>

The mystery surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's PRIVATE ISLAND is telling a tale!

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  eat-the-press-do-not-read-it  •  5 years ago  •  11 comments

The mystery surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's PRIVATE ISLAND is telling a tale!
Epstein is a lot of fun. He love women more than me, and, younger, too" - Donald J. Trump

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Locals call it "The Perverts Island", or, "Orgy Island", where Jeffrey Epstein and his VIP friends threw parties featuring underage girls and some of the most influential names in America were frequent visitors.

Names that pop up include TRUMP, Clinton, members of the Senate and the House of Representative, attorneys to the powerful, and many, many more.

Trump has admitted that was "Best Friends" with Jeffrey and considered him a "good guy", a "lot of fun", despite his conviction for "soliciting prostitution" from underage teens.

Trump, now, that Jeffrey is back in the "Hot Seats" claims that he had a "falling out" with Epstein about 10 years ago, and hasn't seen, or, talked or had a "sleep over" with him.

The world knows that Trump is a pathological liar , so, we cannot take his word for anything, now, can we?

256

Currently, Trump's BF has been arrested as a suspect in a Child Slavery Sex Ring that Epstein organized, headed, and financed for his twisted Rich Sisters: fellow billionaires, and high profile politicians.

The line up includes mostly Republicans, and a few high profile Democrats, plus so social lites, our "sauces" claim.

READ IT AND WEEP - F ellow Trump Travelers , the man yo'll idolize is a child sexual predator monster, as much as his "like-minded sexual predator" buddy, Jeffrey Epstein.

The old adage, "You are known by the company you keep", is still good advice.

Hiding one's crimes behind a Wall of Ill-Gotten Gains, and, blocked by a fleet of high-priced attorneys is not synonymous with NOT GUILTY.

The SUPER RICH, too, often believe that the Rule of Law does not apply to them. Many of an incarcerated GANGSTERS held similar views!
256


This young lady was 12 when she says that she was raped by Trump. In her affidavit to Judge Ronnie Abrams count, she claims that Trump slapped, forcibly raped her several time, threaten her family if she every divulged what Trump did to her that Summer.

Remember the Access TV tape? Or, the 19 women that have come forward at considerable risk to expose this pervert in the White-house? Five women have accused Trump of raping them, including his first wife, Ivana, who later recanted after she received tens of millions in "shut up" money.

Trump is a piece of work! The thrice divorced, serial adult-er is believed by some Evangelicals to have been "Chosen by God" to usher in the "END OF TIMES". Who would be a better choice than the "evil, debauchery soaked Trump to fulfill that prophesy?

Oh, God save us from the STUPID!


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It    5 years ago

I am not certain that I "seeded" this article correctly, or, to the satisfaction of [ Deleted.  Enough with the meta, Eat the Press.  Further meta will result in points toward suspension. ]

If not, I am quite certain that the Pro-Trump Idolizers will crawl through it letter by letter to see what is accrued fodder for their tirades.256

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
1.1  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @1    5 years ago

Exactly what are you talking about, Sandy-2021492, when you say "enough with the meta"?

 The American Heritage Dictionary of English defines "Meta" as a "River rising in the West Central part of Columbia".

The other usages indicate that it is a "prefix for anatomy," e.g., "Metacarpus".

Does TheNewsTalkers.com have its own lexicon? Or, is this question another example of my violating "meta".

Is that the River, or, the prefix for medical terms?

I am sincerely trying to comply with the CofC, as I understand them, but, there seems to be a disconnect in communication.

Meta is discussion about the site or its operation, including moderation.  If you have a problem with a mod's decision, take it up with them via chat or private message.  Barring that, take your issue to Perrie.  If you want to discuss the site, including moderation, you can do so in the group "Metafied", accessible via the "Meta" button at the top of your screen.  This keeps discussion on topic, without veering off into arguments about the site.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
1.1.1  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @1.1    5 years ago

Clever . . .!

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
1.1.2  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @1.1    5 years ago
[Deleted.  Enough with the meta, Eat the Press.  Further meta will result in points toward suspension.]

Really, now, what does this even mean?  "Enough with the "meta"?


 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
1.1.3  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @1.1    5 years ago

I forever bow to your wisdom. I shall do so, immediately. I stand rebuked.

Will you, then, rebuke Trump?

His sins seem far greater than mine. Mine is a mere ignorance of protocol. The article attests to the validity of the accusations being brought against the occupant of the Oval Office. 

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
2  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It    5 years ago

512

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
2.1  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @2    5 years ago

"Jes more Fake News from Left Wing, Socialist, Pinko Communist, non-patriots", I heard one of my hallucination whisperers say.

 
 
 
Eat The Press Do Not Read It
Professor Guide
3  seeder  Eat The Press Do Not Read It    5 years ago

Odd, that the horrendous accusations made in this seeded article are not the subject of discussion, rather, the protocol of addressing alleged criticisms of TNT is the primary focus for some.

What strange Code of Ethics is this?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  Texan1211  replied to  Eat The Press Do Not Read It @3    5 years ago
Odd, that the horrendous accusations made in this seeded article are not the subject of discussion, rather, the protocol of addressing alleged criticisms of TNT is the primary focus for some.

Any fool can make an accusation.

B.F.D.

For instance, I can write that some Democrats want to take all guns away from law-abiding citizens, or that they want an open border.

Does me writing it make it true?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4  Texan1211    5 years ago

Regurgitating a dead lawsuit now?

Really?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
5  It Is ME    5 years ago

"The old adage, "You are known by the company you keep", is still good advice."

Not really.

Some of the folks I know, that seem to show up, I concider "Dicks".....but I'll nod and smile now and again (Just being polite), as they bring forth their "Dickishness". 

Doesn't make me a "Dick" for sure, unless a few "Limp" (nod and smile) moments is a bad thing.

 
 

Who is online

Jack_TX
GregTx
JohnRussell
devangelical


189 visitors