╌>

We Have A President Who Will Lie At The Drop Of A Hat

  

Category:  News & Politics

By:  john-russell  •  5 years ago  •  62 comments

We Have A President Who Will Lie At The Drop Of A Hat
Unfortunately both for Trump's re-election prospects, and for the American people, no one ever knows if Trump is telling the truth or lying about any given topic or instance. It's basically a coin toss. 

President* Trump realizes that he wants X to be the case, but the reality on the ground is Y. What does someone like Donald Trump do when reality does not agree with his desires?  He tries to create his own reality. I would suggest a large portion of his 12,000 lies and misstatements come from his inability to accept the details of reality. He loses a state like New Hampshire to Hillary Clinton? The remedy is to invent an alternate history where it was stolen from him. When New Hampshire officials responsible for policing the voting in that state tell him that everything was proper with the results, Trump eventually doubles down on his accusation. This is where his 12,000 lies accumulate, he repeats fragments of false reality numerous times, in many cases.

Most Americans, the 65 or 70 percent of the population who do not believe Trump tells the truth, often hear the president of the United States say something and have no way of knowing whether Trump's words align with the reality of the situation. On the face of it would seem like an important problem that needs to be corrected by Trump and his aides and advisers, but in practice everyone involved just denies it is an issue. 

The Week magazine had an example this morning


On Monday morning, President Trump told reporters in Biarritz, France, that " China called last night " and said they want to  resume trade talks , later  elaborating  that two "high-level" Chinese officials had called to try and restart stalled negotiations. He turned to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin for backup, and Mnuchin said there had been "communication," later amending it to "communications."

Well, "aides privately conceded the phone calls Trump described didn't happen they way he said they did,"  CNN reported Wednesday . "Instead, two officials said Trump was eager to project optimism that might boost markets, and conflated comments from China's vice premier with direct communication from the Chinese."

Trump is agitated,  CNN reports , because "the economy is flashing warning signs Trump didn't expect, his trade war with China is dragging on months longer than expected yet he refuses to give in," and he's "spinning to find victories to sell to voters." The voters may be fooled —  China apparently isn't Peter Weber



Reality was that the stock market was struggling because of Trump's trade war with China, and it was a reality that Trump did not want to accept. So he made up a "phone call" from China which purportedly signaled hope for negotiations. Trump lies so much that surely he didnt blink an eye when he fabricated the "phone call". 

Unfortunately both for Trump's re-election prospects, and for the American people, no one ever knows if Trump is telling the truth or lying about any given topic or instance. It's basically a coin toss. 

The sad part is that his base completely accepts this situation. 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    5 years ago

There is another example this morning as well.  The president* is lying about having made statements to the effect that he will pardon aides who break the law by seizing private land at the southern border in order to build "the wall". 

"The president has repeatedly suggested during meetings on immigration policy that aides 'take the land' and 'get it done,' according to a person who has heard him say it." Two sources  confirmed Trump's pardon comments  to CNN. The reports aren't unbelievable. Trump "has publicly talked up the government's ability to seize land for infrastructure purposes, and he has dangled pardons before,"  the  Times  reports . In fact, the  Post   adds,  "several of the 15 pardons that Trump has issued during his presidency — a power that is nearly unchecked and that Trump has relished — have carried with them an overtly political tone," sending "indirect signals of his willingness to help those close to him escape punishment."
 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @1    5 years ago

How are his aides supposed to seize that land? Just walk on it, plant a flag, and declare "It's mine!"?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    5 years ago
Just walk on it, plant a flag, and declare "It's mine!"?

In all honesty? That's pretty much what would happen. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.1    5 years ago

I wonder how my neighbor would feel if I put caution tape around his pond and declared it mine?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    5 years ago
How are his aides supposed to seize that land? Just walk on it, plant a flag, and declare "It's mine!"?

In Trump's mind?  Yes...

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.1.4  MrFrost  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.2    5 years ago

I wonder how my neighbor would feel if I put caution tape around his pond and declared it mine?

Probably not well.. LOL

In reality the government would cut a check for the property, (which would be far below market value), and essentially tell the owner to go pound sand. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.4    5 years ago

I thought that when the government condemned a property under Eminent Domain they had to give you fair market value for it?

Of course, with that SCOTUS hearing about that thing in Conneticut (?), who knows now? (I can't remember the name of that case where the local gov't condemned a property because of civic value or some such nonsense)

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.6  Jack_TX  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.5    5 years ago
I thought that when the government condemned a property under Eminent Domain they had to give you fair market value for it?

They do.  And they would.

When you hear the word "seize", consider the source.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.7  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.5    5 years ago
I thought that when the government condemned a property under Eminent Domain they had to give you fair market value for it?

Who determines the "fair market value"?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.7    5 years ago

The real estate market? I dunno

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1.9  Jack_TX  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.7    5 years ago
Who determines the "fair market value"?

This has happened to several of my clients.

Usually, they make you an offer.  You think it's worth more than they offer.  They counter offer.  You counter offer.  You still disagree so you end up in arbitration where you get pretty close to what you wanted to begin with.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.8    5 years ago
The real estate market? I dunno

I don't know either.  But anyone want to bet that it eventually comes down to the government determining "fair market value"?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.1.11  cjcold  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.4    5 years ago

Water wars in the old West saw many improvements in ranch rifles.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @1    5 years ago

He lies and then doubles down on the lies

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @1.2    5 years ago

He wins and will double down on that with re election next year.  

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2  1stwarrior    5 years ago

"Another totally Fake story in the Amazon Washington Post (lobbyist) which states that if my Aides broke the law to build the Wall (which is going up rapidly), I would give them a Pardon. This was made up by the Washington Post only in order to demean and disparage - FAKE NEWS!" Trump tweeted.

Yawwwnnnnn - guess we can all go back to sleep now that this "new" story has been posted, eh?  Since it's only a commentary, what's new?

However, the bias of The Week's commentary section clearly  leans left  overall. The Week's news portion is much more easily found in its print magazine than online. In addition, The Week's homepage features mostly commentary, giving its homepage a Lean Left bent.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @2    5 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to    5 years ago
“Trumpsters like it when he lies.”  It’s the high point of my day.

Those 2 sentences say more about you than I cared to know

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.2  MrFrost  replied to  1stwarrior @2    5 years ago
FAKE NEWS!" Trump tweeted.

Remember when trump said the stormy daniels thing was fake news? If trump says it's fake news, it's likely true. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  1stwarrior @2    5 years ago
Yawwwnnnnn

"A White House official hadn't denied Trump's pardon offers to the Post, saying only that Trump was joking, and a senior administration official told the Times the same thing, insisting that when Trump offers pardons or asks aides to break the law, "he winks when he does it."

We are stuck with a sad, fat half-wit mob boss who thinks he can pretend to be joking anytime he gets in trouble for suggesting completely illegal actions to his aides. We know from the Mueller report that he did try to get several of his staff to lie and to fire those investigating him.

It seems the bar for his supporters is that if he lies in public it's no big deal because they see the lies as inconsequential, and if he lies or makes comments that are consequential then it was just a joke.

"Sure, I joked about having that lying snitch Smitty killed, but I never told anyone to go do it... And just because Smitty washed up on the Jersey shore wearing concrete boots doesn't mean I had anything to do with it. And besides, even if I did have something to do with it, Smitty was a piece of shit, hired muscle, nothing but a thug, but I didn't ask anyone to get rid of him, that's just a bunch of fake news...".

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.3    5 years ago

Good comment. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.4  XXJefferson51  replied to  1stwarrior @2    5 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.5  XXJefferson51  replied to  1stwarrior @2    5 years ago

Great post.  I absolutely loved your linked source and highly recommend it. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3  MrFrost    5 years ago

"I hereby order all companies to stop doing business with China!!!!'

'take the land' and 'get it done,'

.

Trump is a fascist and a wannabe dictator.

The outrage from the right would be a gallows in the street if a democrat had said something like that. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  MrFrost @3    5 years ago

I think it is fair to say that "conservatives" have lowered their standards for presidential honesty over the past three years. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    5 years ago
have lowered their standards for presidential honesty over the past three years. 

Lowered? More like threw it out the window. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.1    5 years ago

What standards?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.2    5 years ago

Well we all know that many Trumps critics if they didn’t double standards wouldn’t have any at all.  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4  Ronin2    5 years ago

You know we really should hold elections so Trump can be voted out of office. Oh wait, we do.

It is really funny that the left is focusing so hard on Trump; when it should be concentrating on their candidates- all 20 some odd of them- running for President. They need to get the word on how their candidates differ from one another on the main issues. Unfortunately all they have is an insane exploding clown car of candidates running ever further left. Anyone outside of the hard left that stops and looks at their agenda is turned off.

So it will be Trump 24/7 up to election night. The Democrats only hope is to make Trump look so bad that everyone will ignore their candidates agenda.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ronin2 @4    5 years ago
The Democrats only hope is to make Trump look so bad that everyone will ignore their candidates agenda

Democrats don't have to bother making Trump look bad, he does that all on his own.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.1.1  Jack_TX  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1    5 years ago
Democrats don't have to bother making Trump look bad, he does that all on his own.

They might consider explaining how they would be better.

Doubling my taxes so they can take away my healthcare is not actually "better".

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Jack_TX @4.1.1    5 years ago
Doubling my taxes so they can take away my healthcare is not actually "better".

They love to take from some and give to others.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jack_TX @4.1.1    5 years ago
Doubling my taxes so they can take away my healthcare is not actually "better".

"Today's level (of uninsured) is the highest in more than four years, and well above the low point of 10.9 percent reached in 2016," the report said. "The 2.8-percentage-point increase since that low represents a net increase of about seven million adults without health insurance."

"Trump likes to claim that everything he does is the largest by any President. He is going to get his “wish” with the budget deficit since they are on course to be the biggest in an expanding economy. Between the 2018 tax cuts and the increase in spending for 2020 and 2021 it will push the accumulated deficits to be the largest ever over a four-year timeframe ."

Considering Trump is the one kicking millions off their health insurance and doubling deficit spending I guess you won't be casting your vote for him in 2020.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.1.4  Jack_TX  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1.3    5 years ago
"Today's level (of uninsured) is the highest in more than four years, and well above the low point of 10.9 percent reached in 2016," the report said. "The 2.8-percentage-point increase since that low represents a net increase of about seven million adults without health insurance."

Interesting what happens when you give people the freedom to make their own decisions.

"Trump likes to claim that everything he does is the largest by any President. He is going to get his “wish” with the budget deficit since they are on course to be the biggest in an expanding economy. Between the 2018 tax cuts and the increase in spending for 2020 and 2021 it will push the accumulated deficits to be the largest ever over a four-year timeframe ."

AOC is telling us that deficits don't matter when it comes to her Green New Deal.  So do they matter or not?  Will you be voting for the candidate least likely to balloon the deficit?  That would rule out Bernie, Warren, Harris and several others.  So...Biden?

Considering Trump is the one kicking millions off their health insurance and doubling deficit spending I guess you won't be casting your vote for him in 2020.

Riiiight.  Because "not forcing you to buy" something is ...in some universe somewhere...the same as "kicking you off".   So "not forcing you to buy" a Mercedes is the same as "kicking you out" of your Mercedes.  Riiiiight.  That's not totally batshit or anything.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
4.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  Jack_TX @4.1.1    5 years ago
Doubling my taxes so they can take away my healthcare is not actually "better".

Actually, you have to pay either way and the ACA was based on participation, blame the people that refused to sign up for the ACA not dropping to that fabled $2,500.00 a year. 

Old System: Poor person goes to the ER, (because they have no ins.), which usually runs 3-4 thousand dollars a visit regardless of the reason. Poor person cannot pay so the hospital eats part of it and the rest is written off, which is picked up by the taxpayers. 

ACA: Poor person now has insurance and they can go to a doctors office which is going to run ~$150.00. They still cannot pay for it, but, it's only $150.00 instead of 3-4 thousand dollars.

Summary? Either way, no matter what happens, you WILL be helping pay their medical bills, the only question is, what would you rather have to cover?

$150.00 or;

$3-4,000.00? 

Judging by the right wing's reaction, they are much happier paying far more money to help people with their medical bills. "Genius"... jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
4.1.6  Jack_TX  replied to  MrFrost @4.1.5    5 years ago
Actually, you have to pay either way and the ACA was based on participation,

I wasn't referring to the ACA.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.7  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jack_TX @4.1.4    5 years ago

All your points above are well made and right on.  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
5  Paula Bartholomew    5 years ago

There is an old saying.

"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, then baffle them with bullshit."  Trump baffles the world 24/7.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
7  lady in black    5 years ago

We have a president who thinks he should be given special treatment.  Once again acting like a fucking dictator.....what a fucking disgrace

Trump suggests he should have extra time as president, in rant over ‘dishonest fool’ Comey’s leaks

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
7.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @7    5 years ago

We are going to give him that extra time as in 4 more years.. 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
7.1.1  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @7.1    5 years ago

Did you consult your crystal ball?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
7.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  XXJefferson51 @7.1    5 years ago

We are going to give him that extra time as in 4 more years.. 

More time to run up the debt? He said he would pay off the debt in 4 years and in 3 he has ADDED just short of three trillion. He lied. And where is that wonderful healthcare for all that trump was pushing? Nothing new? He lied. Tax breaks for the middle class? Lie. 10% tax cuts for the middle class that he announced days before the midterms? Where are they? Lie. 

Trump flat out lies to your face every day, and you just smile and say how great he is? Look up the definition of a cult, you're in one. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.3  bugsy  replied to  MrFrost @7.1.2    5 years ago
He lied

So he's a politician. No different than the thousands of others before him.

 
 
 
TTGA
Professor Silent
7.1.4  TTGA  replied to  MrFrost @7.1.2    5 years ago
More time to run up the debt? He said he would pay off the debt in 4 years and in 3 he has ADDED just short of three trillion. He lied. And where is that wonderful healthcare for all that trump was pushing? Nothing new? He lied. Tax breaks for the middle class? Lie. 10% tax cuts for the middle class that he announced days before the midterms? Where are they? Lie. 

FAR OUT Mr. Frost!!!  What you just said means that any prediction Trump made which did not pan out 100% is a lie.  EXCELLENT.  That means that we can now hold Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Pete Butagieg, Beto O'Rourke, and all other Democrat politicians to exactly the same standard.

  Sorry Mr. Sanders, when you proposed to give us health care for all and free tuition paid for by corporations and the one percent, which anyone who can do basic mathematics can determine is totally impossible, YOU LIED.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.5  bugsy  replied to  TTGA @7.1.4    5 years ago
Sorry Mr. Sanders, when you proposed to give us health care for all and free tuition paid for by corporations and the one percent, which anyone who can do basic mathematics can determine is totally impossible, YOU LIED.

Exactly. He has been a Senator for decades, and he had the chance to at least propose these bullshit ideas, but never did. Same thing with Elizabeth Warren. She also had opportunities to propose the bs she is pushing today.

He is nothing but a pandering socialist who warps the minds of our younger people to push a well known failed ideology.

AND...He's a liar.

 
 
 
TTGA
Professor Silent
7.1.6  TTGA  replied to  bugsy @7.1.5    5 years ago
He is nothing but a pandering socialist who warps the minds of our younger people to push a well known failed ideology. AND...He's a liar.

Those things are, of course, very true.  The really great thing is, however, that the left wing has changed the definition of what is a lie by their treatment of the President.  That allows us to adopt that definition.

  From this point forward, any Democrat who says that he/she will walk ten steps forward and only walks nine, or who veers more than one degree off from walking exactly forward IS A LIAR.  If they don't like that definition being used on them, they shouldn't have tried it on Trump.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
8  al Jizzerror    5 years ago

Trump entered politics after securing the support of racists with his five year long "birther" lie.

800  

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
9  freepress    5 years ago

He is nothing but a con man professional liar who has had a lifetime of experience avoiding consequences with an army of high priced attorneys. Whether it was discrimination in housing, cheating his contractors or employees, or cheating on wives, paying off mistresses, and paying off sexual assault victims. He is a liar.

 
 

Who is online




56 visitors