Should pedophiles be castrated?

  
Via:  krishna  •  3 weeks ago  •  43 comments

Should pedophiles be castrated?
NO: Saying pedophiles should be castrated so they wouldn't rape children is like saying heterosexuals should be castrated so they won't rape the opposite sex.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


512

Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein (CNN)

YES: Think about it. Of course they should be castrated what if they rape a girl under 18 that is able to have children and gets pregnant. It might not stop them from doing it again but atleast the child won't have to go through the pain of having to go through the pain of having thier abusers child in thier womb.

NO: Saying pedophiles should be castrated so they wouldn't rape children is like saying heterosexuals should be castrated so they won't rape the opposite sex.   

A pedophile can't control whether they are a pedophile or not. They simply are due to their sexual attraction. However, they aren't necessarily rapists, even if many are. They don't have some superhuman urge to have sex with young children. They simply have a sexual attraction. Now, if you're asking if child molesters and rapists should be castrated, I say no. The way I see it, you did the crime, you did the time, you're done. Of course, people need to know you went to jail and for what and all, but still.

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
Krishna
1  seeder  Krishna    3 weeks ago

A pedophile can't control whether they are a pedophile or not. They simply are due to their sexual attraction. However, they aren't necessarily rapists, even if many are. They don't have some superhuman urge to have sex with young children. They simply have a sexual attraction. Now, if you're asking if child molesters and rapists should be castrated, I say no. The way I see it, you did the crime, you did the time, you're done. Of course, people need to know you went to jail and for what and all, but still.

 
 
 
TTGA
1.1  TTGA  replied to  Krishna @1    2 weeks ago

Krish,

A better solution than castration; just give them the best psychological treatment ever, the BN158 treatment.  No more pedophilia.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
1.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  TTGA @1.1    2 weeks ago

Don't make me go look that up. Be a pal and tell me what BN158 is

 
 
 
TTGA
1.1.2  TTGA  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.1    2 weeks ago

158 grains of lead applied to the back of the neck.  NOTE:  158 grains (about 1/3 of an ounce) is the weight of a standard .38 Special bullet

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
1.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  TTGA @1.1.2    2 weeks ago

See? One can learn something new everyday. Thanks!

 
 
 
TTGA
1.1.4  TTGA  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.3    2 weeks ago

You won't find that one in a dictionary, but most cops know what it means.

 
 
 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
2  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh    3 weeks ago

It would be too expensive. We'd castrate a rapist, then they go to prison where a large white supremacist claims them bitch and tattoos a swastika on their ass, then we would have to castrate Vern too. He'd then get raped and the endless cycle of castrations would put an unfair burden on the tax payer.

Then they join news forums when they get out and post anti-Jewish articles because they were indoctrinated and inseminated by Vern. There will always be another Vern.

We can ban them though. That works. It's like online castration.

 
 
 
dave-2693993
3  dave-2693993    3 weeks ago
Should Pedophiles Be Castrated?

No.

Execution squad.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
3.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  dave-2693993 @3    3 weeks ago
Execution squad.

Can we execute them by slowly castrating them with rusty hacksaws?

 
 
 
dave-2693993
3.1.1  dave-2693993  replied to  al Jizzerror @3.1    2 weeks ago

Works for me.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.2  Ozzwald  replied to  dave-2693993 @3    2 weeks ago
No. Execution squad.

Pedophilia is an easily treated disease.  All pedophiles should be forced to to take the cure for this disease.

  • You start with, Sodium thiopental or pentobarbital.
  • Followed by Pancuronium bromide.
  • Then the chaser, a shot of Potassium chloride.

Guarantee they will never have another inappropriate thought about a minor again.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2    2 weeks ago

They are born that way. Should we execute anyone ever diagnosed with pedophilia?

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.1    2 weeks ago
They are born that way. Should we execute anyone ever diagnosed with pedophilia?

Yes.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.2    2 weeks ago

And that is different than fools wanting to kill gays how exactly???

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JBB
3.2.4  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.3    2 weeks ago

No children are harmed when two consenting adults engage in sex...

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.5  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @3.2.4    2 weeks ago
No children are harmed when two consenting adults engage in sex..

No one is harmed because someone is a pedophile.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.2.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.5    2 weeks ago

No one is harmed because someone is a pedophile.

A child cannot consent.

skeptical-baby-duh-meme.png

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
3.2.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.5    2 weeks ago

Excuse me?  No one is harmed?!?!  How about you put your children with one seeing as no one is harmed.  They should be perfectly safe, right?

 
 
 
TTGA
3.2.8  TTGA  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.2.7    2 weeks ago

I think that I know what Tex means Paula.  Just being diagnosed by a psychologist as a pedophile or having a gene that would cause it, does not rate punishment.  That cannot come until the person has actually committed an act involving pedophilia.  You cannot punish someone until they have actually committed a crime and been sentenced, even though you may know because of the diagnosis that they will eventually do so.  That is an example of reactive law enforcement, the only kind that allows for any kind of freedom.  Proactive law enforcement is almost certain to lead to a totalitarian police state.

So, that means that my BN158 treatment can't be used until the crime has actually been committed.  It is more useful in making sure that it never happens twice.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.2.9  Ozzwald  replied to  TTGA @3.2.8    2 weeks ago
Just being diagnosed by a psychologist as a pedophile or having a gene that would cause it, does not rate punishment.

That's not how it works.  Even if a psychologist knows about his patient's tendencies, doctor patient confidentiality prevents him from telling anyone about it.  If a person comes out as a pedophile, it is only because of an action he has taken coming to light.

If you would like to provide me with a list of diagnosed pedophiles, that have not been outed by some action or another, I will admit to being wrong.  But this would have to fall under your example and be a list from a certified psychologist(s) of their patients with pedophilia tendencies who have shown no sign of acting upon those tendencies.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.9    2 weeks ago

I think that's what TTGA is saying. A pedophile can't be prosecuted until he/she commits a crime. Even if diagnosed by doctor or a blood test, it's immaterial until that person does something heinous

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.2.11  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.10    2 weeks ago
A pedophile can't be prosecuted until he/she commits a crime

At what point did I ever mention "prosecute"?

Are you saying that pedophiles are a-okay with you as long as they are never caught?  Jeffrey Epstein, and what he did, was fine with you until he was caught?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.12  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.11    2 weeks ago
At what point did I ever mention "prosecute"?

You didn't.

Are you saying that pedophiles are a-okay with you as long as they are never caught? 

If they never harm a living soul or download child porn, what can I or you do about it? However, IF they do harm a child, I want them prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
3.2.13  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.12    2 weeks ago
If they never harm a living soul or download child porn, what can I or you do about it?

Again, I never implied any action realistically.  Theoretically I seen no reason for their continued existence, but in the real world, unless I witness something, you are correct in that I cannot do anything.

Since you mentioned it, I assume you are okay with child porn as long as the poster hasn't been prosecuted?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.14  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.13    one week ago

No, I am absolutely not ok with child porn but the only way to stop it is to catch the bastards and prosecute them

 
 
 
Krishna
4  seeder  Krishna    3 weeks ago

Related:

Pedophile advocacy groups

See also: Category:Pedophile activism and List of pedophile and pederast advocacy organizations

From the late 1950s to early 1990s, several pedophile membership organizations advocated age of consent reform to lower or abolish age of consent laws, as well as for the acceptance of pedophilia as a sexual orientation rather than a psychological disorder,and for the legalization of child pornography.

The efforts of pedophile advocacy groups did not gain any public support, and today those few groups that have not dissolved have only minimal membership and have ceased their activities other than through a few websites

 
 
 
Goodtime Charlie
5  Goodtime Charlie    2 weeks ago

What good would castration do? A pedophile is still going to be sexually attracted to children. The problem isn't between the legs, its between the ears.

 
 
 
CometRider
5.1  CometRider  replied to  Goodtime Charlie @5    2 weeks ago
What good would castration do? A pedophile is still going to be sexually attracted to children. The problem isn't between the legs, its between the ears.

In that case, a lobotomy would cure it.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
6  Nerm_L    2 weeks ago

I think sterilization has been tried before.  Eugenics by any other name is still eugenics.  

The only reason to sterilize sexual deviants would be to prevent pregnancies.  That doesn't protect anyone from the crimes committed by sexual deviants.  Protecting a rape victim from becoming pregnant isn't a substitute for preventing rapes.

If the idea is to prevent repetition of the crime then some consideration should be given to the death penalty.  Mutilating perpetrators of sex crimes really isn't more humane treatment.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
6.1  mocowgirl  replied to  Nerm_L @6    2 weeks ago
If the idea is to prevent repetition of the crime then some consideration should be given to the death penalty.  Mutilating perpetrators of sex crimes really isn't more humane treatment.

I agree.

I looked at some stats on pedophiles.  I am doubting that many families are going to be able to admit they they are raising a pedophile when they discover their teenager raping toddlers.   

Until pedophilia is better understood by society, I don't know that our societal conscience will allow us to execute teenage pedophiles even though it could be the most humane thing to do period.

https://www.thoughtco.com/facts-about-child-sexual-abuse-statistics-3533871

An estimated 25% of girls and 16% of boys experience sexual abuse before they turn 18 years old.   Statistics for boys may be falsely low because of reporting techniques. (Ann Botash, MD, in   Pediatric Annual , May 1997.)

  1. Of all   victims of sexual assault   reported to law enforcement agencies
    • 67% were under age 18
    • 34% were under age 12
    • 14% were under age 6
    Of offenders who victimized children under age 6, 40% were under age 18.   (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000.)
  2. The consequences of child sexual abuse are wide-ranging and varied . They can include: According to the American Medical Association,  20% of all victims develop serious long-term psychological problems . They may take the form of:
    • dissociative responses and other signs of post-traumatic stress syndrome
    • chronic states of arousal
    • nightmares
    • flashbacks
    • venereal disease
    • anxiety over sex
    • fear of exposing the body during medical exams
    ("Child Sexual Abuse: Does the Nation Face an Epidemic - or a Wave of Hysteria?"  CQ Researcher , 1993.)
 
 
 
 
mocowgirl
6.1.1  mocowgirl  replied to  mocowgirl @6.1    2 weeks ago
I am doubting that many families are going to be able to admit they they are raising a pedophile when they discover their teenager raping toddlers. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
7  MrFrost    2 weeks ago

Anyone remember the movie, "The Wanderers"? 

"Rock-n-cock"... perfect for pedo scum. 

 
 
 
bbl-1
8  bbl-1    2 weeks ago

No.

 
 
 
lady in black
9  lady in black    2 weeks ago

They can start with the faux christian Duggar family

 
 
 
bbl-1
9.1  bbl-1  replied to  lady in black @9    2 weeks ago

I would make an exception there.

 
 
 
dennis smith
10  dennis smith    2 weeks ago

There are few things in life deserve the death penalty and this is one of them. No second chance for Pedophiles.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
10.1  mocowgirl  replied to  dennis smith @10    2 weeks ago
No second chance for Pedophiles.

Agreed.  

Society has a duty to protect our children from sexual predators.

This man is still blaming his 7 year victim even after serving time in prison.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
11  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 weeks ago
Should Pedophiles Be Castrated?

Yes.  From the shoulders up.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
12  Paula Bartholomew    2 weeks ago

You don't need a penis to rape.  There are plenty of inanimate objects that can be used.  So unless you chop off their arms as well, castration is a wasted effort.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
12.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @12    2 weeks ago

Good point. Maybe Big Pharma could come up with a drug to treat pedophiles

 
 
 
mocowgirl
12.1.1  mocowgirl  replied to  Trout Giggles @12.1    2 weeks ago
Maybe Big Pharma could come up with a drug to treat pedophiles

Although I agree that would be the ideal, I see major hurdles.

It would involve rewiring their brain with a drug.

Even if such a drug is possible, it would need major government funding for research and development, and willing test subjects.  Then, we would have to somehow figure out a way to make it legal to force a pedophile to take a drug that may have side effects that cause brain damage and even death.  Also, can society force a pedophile to take a drug prior to being convicted for molesting/raping a child?  If not, then this drug would be used in order to basically neuter them so they can be released after incarceration for their crimes.  

In another discussion (a few months ago), the subject of allowing pedophiles (who have not offended) to seek therapy without police notification was mentioned.  I am supportive of the therapy w/o police notification up to a point with certain limits.  The pedophile cannot be working with children in any capacity and cannot use their therapy bid in any manner to lessen their punishment if they do molest/rape a child.

Pedophiles are predators.  I think it is difficult for anyone with empathy to understand how anyone can live without a conscience, but how could anyone, with any grain of empathy, sympathy or compassion, molest/rape children and call it "love for the child" or say the child "wanted" to be molested/raped?

 
 
 
Kathleen
13  Kathleen    2 weeks ago

They make me sick.

Throw them in a cell and throw away the key.

 
 
 
Krishna
15  seeder  Krishna    2 weeks ago
(deleted)
 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


lib50


25 visitors