10 injured in shooting after high school football game in Alabama
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
At least 10 teenagers were injured when a shooting broke out after a high school football game in Mobile, Alabama, on Friday night, authorities said. Nine of the victims suffered gunshot wounds.
Deangelo Parnell, 17, was arrested and charged on nine counts of attempted murder, a police spokesperson told CBS affiliate WKRG.
Gunfire broke out inside the concourse of Ladd-Peebles Stadium at the conclusion of the LeFlore vs. Williamson High School football game. The shooting was partially recorded by security cameras, WKRG reported.
The victims' ages ranged from 15 to 18 years old. Five were transported to local hospitals in critical condition.
"Why are the young people bringing this type of violence to public events?" Mobile Police Chief Lawrence Battiste asked in a news conference Friday. "They're bringing their beefs that they have with each other in their neighborhoods and they're putting other people in harm's way."
Police were still questioning witnesses late Friday and said the shooting investigation was ongoing.
Tags
Who is online
94 visitors
Where is the faux rage be the Anti 2nd amendment snowflakes?
Oh wait it doesn't fit the narrative.
A minor with a gun in a gun free zone and being black to boot, shooting other black folks, children mind you, just doesn't have the same ring to it as a white shooter that they can try to tie to the right.
I wonder what the total deaths in Chicago will be this weekend?
SO you are admitting that gun violence in the USA is a problem. Thanks for that.
So that is what you got out of my comment? Not suprising.
Try reading my comment again.
Spot on response.
You notice as I stated this gun violence perpetrated by a black youth is a non issue with the Anti second amendment folks. It's to touchy of a subject for them to address. It's much easier to sit back and call everyone a racist.
Where exactly did I say anything about race?
Well, since you seem to think it was so clever. Can we then assume that the only reason you ran the article was because the suspect is Black? I mean, no one even died, yet you seem to think this is somehow worse or more heinous than the shootings in Texas, (where people DID die)?
Oh here we go. WTF is it with you people always telling others what they think. Can you for once try and defend your own comments?
Wow what a disgusting comment. I'm sure the victims in the hospital take solace in your insensitive comments.
I understand your indifference to the people being shot and not killed. You are proving my point and I want to thank you. The left doesn't care about black people being shot as you prove with your own comment.
So all you black people if you get shot it's okay because you know
And hey you people in Maryland, Houston, Philadelphia, Chicago, Trenton that were shot, Suck it up motherfuckers, You don't matter because gosh no one even died FFS.
Sorry but I'm not motivated by race like some people appear to be.
So can we assume that you didn't run the article because the suspect is black? From your comments i can only assume your motivation is Race.
Hey, I am not the one that praised a comment that was based on race.
Indeed, your concern is overwhelming. I wonder if trump will show up to this tragedy?
If you want me or anyone else to believe that this article was posted for any reason other than deflection and playing the race card, good luck. No one is going to buy it. Your past comments prove that.
I'm not black, not even remotely so.
Indeed, so why bring up Chicago? Or this shooting if for no other reason than to deflect?
[ deleted ]
Again, you proved my point, we have a problem with gun violence in this country. You were looking for deflection, and all you did was prove that point.
But i'll give you a break, what's the solution? Do tell.
Sure, and your messiah trump welcomes guns at all of his rallies because more guns makes us safe..
Trump is not the subject, please check your TDS and speak on the article.
I don't give a fuck what you believe, It doesn't change the fact that if you can't use a shooting for your preferred talking points you ignore it, as you are doing here.
What the fuck does that have to do with anything. LMFAO. Has that ever stopped the left from playing the race card. Too fucking funny.
You don't know shit about my posting history so don't tell me what I posted.
You don't know shit about me so keep your personal attacks to yourself.
But it wasn’t a mass shooting because no one died yet....
It depends on whether or not some one wants to use the shooting in a statistic.
Incorrect, it IS a mass shooting as defined by the FBI, (4 victims or more).
Even though I am actually supporting HA's position here with facts, not one up vote. Whew, and here I thought I was on a partisan bs article.
1. Today is Monday. This happened last Friday. Had you seeded it Friday, I would have been happy to show some faux outrage on Friday.
2. You seeded this as a one-up? Pfffttttt.
WTF you talking about?
Never mind.
Wow is it?
What is your point if you have one?
I was enjoying my weekend, But I seen all the faux rage about one shooting and I thought I would see a mention of the other. I mean you have two mass shootings in one day how horrible for the Anti 2nd amendment folks. You think they would have posted this story on a shooting in a gun free zone with little kids as victims.
Alas but then when I looked up the story for myself today I seen it involved a non white shooter and understood why none on the left dragged it out for all the left to get in their faux rage over.
Bingo.
Because it is such a common event.
Look at murders by state.
California is at the top, with Texas being second. But look at the population density, if you adjust to compensate for that, Texas has the highest murder rate in the country by a LONG ways.
Population density, CA. 244.2, Texas 98.07. If Texas had the same population density, Texas would be far and above the most murderous state in the country.
Illinois? 5th. So all those shootings in Chicago? Don't even come close to the murder rate in Texas.
Comment was deleted as off topic by author/ seeder at seeder's request.
Comment was restored because seeder did not flag comment 1.6 as off topic
and this is a continuation. Also the seeder acknowledged the wider scope in his comment 1.2.6 with this comment.
{SP}
You should read your own links much, much better.
Or at LEAST look for a source that actually supports your wondrous claims.
Um, I did. Maybe the data is confusing to you. Sorry.
Not confused in the least.
I saw right through your bogus claim and figured you hadn't actually read it yourself.
Anyone can easily click on your link and see for themselves.
Clearly you are since the data speaks for itself. Anyone can click on the link and see that to be true.
Math is hard for some people, that seems to be your sticking point. Not to worry, not everyone is good at math. It's totally ok.
Yes it IS. Which is why I want to check yours.
heck, I don't even know if you can even ATTEMPT to explain your methodology.
Did you divide California's population density by Texas' and then multiply that number by Texas' murder rate?
Come on, spill how you DID IT!!
Funny thing about your link.
I found 5 states with lower population density than Texas that have
higher murder rates ALREADY---without even doing ANY adjustment for density.
I guess that means that this comment:
is false.
I also found at least 10 states that would surpass Texas if adjusted for density.
How did you adjust to compensate for population density?
Would any state with a lower popular density but a higher murder rate be above Texas in your math?
And if frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their asses when they hopped. Coulda, shoulda, woulda doesn't count for anything.
It was a ridiculous, ludicrous claim, completely unsubstantiated by his very own link.
well look who it come from.
[Deleted]
High school sports makes people insane.