╌>

Why alt-right trolls shouted down Donald Trump Jr.

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  ender  •  5 years ago  •  30 comments

By:   Jane Coaston

Why alt-right trolls shouted down Donald Trump Jr.
The “Groyper Army” and the war over college campus conservatism, explained.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



512

Supporters of President Trump yell at counter protesters outside a book promotion by Donald Trump Jr. at the UCLA campus in Westwood, California, on November 10, 2019.   Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images

A group of alt-right and “dissident right” activists have joined forces with neo-Nazis and others on the far-right fringes to attack conservatives who they feel aren’t true conservatives, both online and in person.

Sunday, for instance, members of this group   heckled Donald Trump Jr.   at an event in California. And conservative speakers have been beset by the “groypers” at events in Texas, Tennessee and Arizona as well.

This group, which calls itself the “groyper army” — “ groyper ” being a reference to a meme of Pepe the Frog, itself a   meme overtaken by the alt-right   — purports to be supporting “traditional values” within conservatism, like immigration restrictionism. And it argues that relatively mainstream conservative student groups like Turning Point USA need to be confronted because they are shutting down “socially conservative Christians and supporters of President Trump’s agenda” and promoting “degeneracy” by having gay speakers.

This “groyper army” targets what it has termed “Conservative Inc,” a collective epitomized by conservative speakers like pundit Ben Shapiro,   Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk , Rep. Dan Crenshaw, conservative writer Jonah Goldberg, and even Trump Jr., as well as conservative student organizations including Turning Point USA and Young Americans for Freedom.

Beyond the sort of heckling Trump faced, the network’s tactics usually focus on asking speakers specific and very leading questions about Israel, immigration, and LGBTQ issues within conservatism, hoping to elicit answers that reveal the speaker’s “ fake conservatism .” “Real conservatism” being defined essentially as an emphasis on ethnic and racial characteristics as determinants for immigration coupled with an isolationist foreign policy and a “traditional” stance on LGBTQ issues. These tactics have gotten   support   from some mainstream right-leaning pundits who advocate for extreme restrictions on immigration, like Michelle Malkin.

In reality, the “groyper army” is simply the alt-right of 2016 and 2017, warmed over, reenergized and using new terminology aimed at disassociating itself from the “ optics ” problem caused by the tremendous failure of 2017’s Unite the Right Rally, which ended in the murder of a young woman. Its leaders and advocates are racists and Holocaust deniers, its message boards   wax rhapsodic   about the man who perpetrated the Christchurch mass shooting, and the questions it presents to conservative speakers are based on anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and “white genocide” fears.

As one source told me after a Turning Point USA event beset by “groypers,” “I did not know there were this many racists out there.”

The groyper army at work


Over the weekend, the “groyper army” targeted Turning Point USA events, one featuring   Donald Trump Jr.   at UCLA and another featuring Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) at Arizona State.

According to a source, the former event was intended to be a brief interview conducted by Kirk, followed by a book signing of Trump Jr.’s new book   Triggered.

But the groyper army, which made up roughly a third of the audience, overwhelmed Trump, Jr. and Trump campaign senior adviser Kimberly Guilfoyle, screaming loudly and demanding a Q&A session (The video above was from the Twitter account of a “groyper army” supporter.)

Rep. Dan Crenshaw was another target of the groyper army this weekend. At an event at Arizona State   titled   “Prove Me Wrong ft. Congressman Dan Crenshaw,” at which Crenshaw answered questions from an audience, Crenshaw was asked a series of questions which he later told me by email were “almost exclusively about Israel.”

“The basic nature of their questions was to ask a question that at first seems like a legitimate policy difference, perfectly debatable,” Crenshaw told me. “But what then becomes clear — and there are hints along the way — the motivations are deeper and darker than their original question indicated.”

One of those questions is centered on the USS Liberty. As BuzzFeed News reporter Ellie Hall   detailed   in 2018:


The USS   Liberty   is a dog whistle referring to an incident in 1967 where Israeli forces fired on the US spy ship,   killing 34 , during the Six-Day War. In the aftermath, Israel said that its pilots had thought the ship was an Egyptian vessel, and apologized — the government eventually paid out   $6.7 million   in reparations to the survivors and families of the dead. Ever since, there have been unproven conspiracy theories surrounding the circumstances that question whether the attack was intentional. Both the Israeli and the United States governments have said that it was   a case of mistaken identity .

The USS Liberty has now become an anti-Semitic meme, used to argue that the Israeli government is actually an enemy of the United States and that the country should not be receiving American funding. And members of the groyper army have been urged online to ask TPUSA speakers about the USS Liberty and other anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, like that of the “dancing Israelis,” which   alleges   that Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks and five Israeli nationals “danced” in celebration while watching them.

They ask these questions with the hopes of creating viral content of the responses like this video, of an October 21 Turning Point USA event at Grand Canyon University.

According to the neo-Nazi website Daily Stormer, countering speakers by simply shouting out specific conspiracy theories is good enough. It urges readers who attend Turning Point USA events who fail in their attempts to ask questions, “When you get pulled out [by security], yell “GOOGLE THE USS LIBERTY” or “GOOGLE DANCING ISRAELIS” or “AMERICA FIRST NOT ISRAEL FIRST” or just “NICK FUENTES.”

Nick Fuentes and “America First”


The groyper army is led in part, or at least symbolically, by   Nick Fuentes , a 22-year-old former conservative radio host and Unite the Right attendee who hosts a YouTube show called “America First.”

A   former ally   of white nationalist Richard Spencer and a friend of white nationalists like   Patrick Casey   and   Vincent Foxx,   Fuentes has attempted to obfuscate his views by arguing on the messaging service Telegram that “America First” is a “traditionalist, Christian, conservative, reformist, American Nationalist” movement while the alt-right was “racialist” and “transnational.”

But this is pure semantics, as Fuentes is a white nationalist and an avowed anti-Semite who   referred to Daily Wire writer Matt Walsh   as a “shabbos goy race traitor” for condemning the   El Paso, Texas, gunman   who killed more than 20 people in August. In fact,   in an interview with a French Canadian white nationalist , Fuentes said that the only reason he didn’t call himself a white nationalist is because “that kind of terminology is used almost exclusively by the left to defame.”

“I think in a way it’s almost redundant that you’re a ‘white’ nationalist. We know that the word ‘nation’ almost implicitly talks about ethnicity and biology,” Fuentes said.

In a series of videos deleted from his YouTube account in late October, Fuentes argues (using a thinly veiled metaphor referring to black Americans as “blackboards” and white Americans as “whiteboards”) that “America First is not America First if it’s not 100 percent whiteboard” and that he’s a “whiteboard nationalist.”

In another video, he advocates for segregation and Jim Crow, arguing “even if it was bad, who cares?” He has also described one of the   Koch brothers   as “an enemy of the white race” and his reaction to the El Paso shooting was to say, “the easiest way for Mexicans to not get shot in Wal-Mart is to not fucking be here.”

In September, Turning Point USA — which   has faced allegations of racist behavior   previously —   cut ties   with a brand ambassador, Ashley St. Clair, who was photographed with   Fuentes , and in October, Fuentes was prevented from accessing an event at Politicon, the annual non-partisan political conference, that featured Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.

A source told me that it was the organization’s decision to cut ties with St. Clair that led to Fuentes’s fight with the organization, and to a host of resignations from chapters from members more aligned with Fuentes’s world view. In fact, a source told me that Turning Point USA decided to dissolve one chapter of the organization, at   Kansas State University , saying, “Turning Point has a very specific big tent message” that Fuentes and his followers are not a part of. He said that the organization largely greeted the resignations with “don’t let the door hit you.”

But he added that Fuentes isn’t trying to take down just Turning Point USA: “He wants to burn down Conservative Inc.”

The war over campus conservatism


The fight over the groyper army is not just about college campuses. It’s about the future of conservatism, and what that future should look like as the groyper army attempts to make itself, as Ben Shapiro   put it in a speech   focused on the alt-right last week, the “heirs of conservatism.”

And yes, that future begins in college. College campuses have long been where conservative groups and conservative concepts get their start, from Young Americans for Freedom and the   Sharon Statement   in the 1960s to the   “trigger the libs”   style of TPUSA.

Basically, there are two paths.

To Rep. Crenshaw, “conservative principles aren’t exclusionary, and I firmly believe the Republican Party must continue to grow.” But in Fuentes’s view, that’s not true — conservatism must be white, Christian, and heterosexual. As he posted on his Telegram account, “America is NOT a propositional nation. We have NO ALLEGIANCE to Israel. We are CHRISTIANS and we don’t promote degeneracy. Demographic replacement is REAL and it will be CATASTROPHIC.”

And Fuentes and his army believe that they are the real conservatives and the true inheritors of conservatism, the last real defenders of what they view Trumpism to actually be standing against the “ unelected face of Trumpism ” in Kirk and other pundits. While   Charlie Kirk and others enjoy close ties to the White House , Fuentes and the groyper army believe that he and similar figures are betraying Trump by allowing LGBTQ conservatives within the movement and advocating for legal immigration.

Or, as   neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin , editor of Daily Stormer, put it, “We want Donald Trump to do what he said he was going to do. ... Kirk and all of these other shills and Jews are traitors to the revolution. They have attached themselves to Trump to push a big money corporatist, homosexualist, Zionist, globalist agenda.”

In a statement, Young Americans for Freedom spokesperson Spencer Brown told me his organization sees the groyper army as working to “advance repugnant views that are antithetical to conservatism’s core belief in the sanctity and equality of every individual. “

But to Fuentes and his groyper army, that’s precisely the problem.

Videos in article at link.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Ender    5 years ago

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Ender @2    5 years ago

So I'm supposed to give my money away because they don't throw people off buildings. No thanks end this wasteful spending and return it to the taxpayers pocket. The government is stealing money from poor people and giving it to rich people with this aid. 

Why Are We Sending $38 Billion to Rich and Powerful Israel?   

"All US foreign aid is immoral and counterproductive. As I have often said, it is money taken from poor people in the US and sent to rich people overseas. That is because US assistance money goes to foreign governments to hand out as they see fit. Often that assistance is stolen outright or it goes to the politically connected in the recipient country.

Just as bad is the fact that much of what we call “foreign aid” is actually welfare for the wealthy here at home. The aid package to Israel is a very good example. According to the agreement, this $38 billion will all go to US weapons manufacturers. So the real beneficiaries are not the American people, and not even Israeli citizens. The real beneficiaries are the US military-industrial complex."

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2.1    5 years ago

The point of the article is not Israel or aid.

It is the tactics used by the antisemitic racists.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Ender @2.1.1    5 years ago

I’m confused which one in your video do you think is anti-semitic the one that would prefer the aid goes to the Jews or the one who doesn’t? 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.3  seeder  Ender  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2.1.2    5 years ago

Did you read the article?

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1.4  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Ender @2.1.3    5 years ago

Yes and I'm still see nothing in the video we are discussing that indicates any racist anti-semitism by either participant. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.5  seeder  Ender  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2.1.4    5 years ago

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1.6  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Ender @2.1.5    5 years ago

Good advice it really sucks when they only want softball questions and are moving people to the back of the line with questions they would rather not answer. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.7  seeder  Ender  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2.1.6    5 years ago

Sounds like you are defending them...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1.8  Nerm_L  replied to  Ender @2.1.1    5 years ago
The point of the article is not Israel or aid. It is the tactics used by the antisemitic racists.

There is a difference between being anti-Semitic and anti pro-Semitic.

The distinction is too subtle for political propaganda, though.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1.9  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Ender @2.1.7    5 years ago

I’m defending the guy that would prefer open dialogue so the tough questions can be asked. I’m not supportive of controlling the conversation and moving people to the back with the questions they would rather not hear. How about you?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.10  seeder  Ender  replied to  Nerm_L @2.1.8    5 years ago

This alt-right group is antisemitic. Their plan is to ask about Israel specifically.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.11  seeder  Ender  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2.1.9    5 years ago

If you think that is what this alt-right group is about.

Their message is clear and you are only trying to divert away from what they are.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1.12  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Ender @2.1.10    5 years ago

So you think they should be moved to the back? This is the whole point of the Q&A. I might not agree with what they stand for but I see no reason to prevent them from asking questions just like everyone else. 

In the video you posted above in comment #2. I thought the kid did a good job of respectfully presenting his point of view and the people on stage dodged and weaved and were not interested in continuing the dialogue. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.13  seeder  Ender  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2.1.12    5 years ago

How is that respectful? Why are you defending a Nazi group?

If you think asking about the USS Liberty has any relevance....

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1.14  Dean Moriarty  replied to  Ender @2.1.13    5 years ago

That was just part of his justification for his position. He was willing to say fine and move past that part of his presentation. That has been a controversial topic for a long time and we had a member here that would bring it up frequently as he held a grudge against Israel for the attack and he was not a Republican. 

I’m not saying it wasn’t an accident but I certainly have no problem with people questioning the government’s claims. 

If you educate yourself on MK Ultra the CIA’s quest for mind control you will see why it is good to question the government. 

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.15  seeder  Ender  replied to  Dean Moriarty @2.1.14    5 years ago

He has no justification for his positions.

Questioning the government is fine, what they are doing is promoting conspiracy theories. When their questions only pertain to Israel, their intentions are clear.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3  Paula Bartholomew    5 years ago

Jr is even more useless than his old man.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3    5 years ago

I am surprised they are attacking Jr when they love trump.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Ender @3.1    5 years ago

Jr is just a cheap imitation of Sr, so they have no use for him.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.3  MrFrost  replied to    5 years ago

He is like the cheap Chinese knock off Trump.

512

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Kavika   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @3.1.1    5 years ago

It's the hair. Jr. doesn't have the squirrel on his head. 

In the world of the alt-right that is a bigly covfefe.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to    5 years ago

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
4  Ed-NavDoc    5 years ago

A bunch of moronic dweebs all the way around on both sides!

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Ender  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @4    5 years ago

I would call them more than that.  Haha

Do you think the rightwing has brought this on themselves? You know, being there are fine people on both sides.

Imo the right somewhat coddled them or ignored them for a vote.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5  seeder  Ender    5 years ago

The videos at the article source show them doing exactly as the article states.

A lot of them are from twitter and I don't have a twitter account.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
5.1  MrFrost  replied to  Ender @5    5 years ago

A lot of them are from twitter and I don't have a twitter account.

I made one ~ two years ago. Six months later our POTUS blocked me. And yes, I do wear that as a badge of honor. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
6  MrFrost    5 years ago

He and his girlfriend thought they were slamming "liberals", when they were actually attacking their own supporters... Priceless. 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
7  bbl-1    5 years ago

Groyper Army.  In the age of Trump.  Simply proves that there is more than what meets the eye when the chief groper said, "When you're a star--you can do anything."

As far as Don Jr.  Uh-------------I-----------uh--------the hell with it.

 
 

Who is online

afrayedknot
Kavika
Texan1211


110 visitors