Nicolle Wallace Quips Putin Must Have 'Lots Of Pee Tapes' For GOP To Push Kremlin Line

  
Via:  tessylo  •  one week ago  •  1 comments

By:   Mary Papenfuss, HuffPost

Nicolle Wallace Quips Putin Must Have 'Lots Of Pee Tapes' For GOP To Push Kremlin Line

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Politics








Nicolle Wallace Quips Putin Must Have 'Lots Of Pee Tapes' For GOP To Push Kremlin Line



710c91c0-4b9c-11e7-8912-374be9390b1b_H-1   Mary Papenfuss, HuffPost   12 hours ago  







A stumped  Nicolle Wallace  quipped on  MSNBC   on Monday that Russian President  Vladimir Putin  “must have lots of  pee tapes ” to get Republicans to parrot Kremlin propaganda.

Wallace, confused by Republicans’ insistence on pushing claims by Putin in “defiance of facts” uncovered by U.S. intelligence officials, was referring to an unfounded claim in a dossier gathered by former British intelligence agent  Christopher Steele  that  Donald Trump  watched prostitutes engage in “ golden showers ” in a Moscow hotel room in 2013. Such tapes could be used as blackmail, Wallace was insinuating — though not seriously. But how else to explain Republicans’ strange insistence on stories that serve Putin’s aims?

Wallace guest and  Bulwark  editor  Charlie Sykes  accused Sen.  John Kennedy  (R-La.) of coming off as an “addled Russian asset” when he claimed Sunday on MSNBC that former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko “actively worked” for Hillary Clinton to skew the American election on her behalf. When an astounded Chuck Todd asked for the basis for Kennedy’s claim, the senator responded: “Just read the articles” — though he identified no “articles.” An exasperated Todd responded: “C’mon!” 

Sykes, a conservative commentator and author, had no explanation for why Kennedy did a “full  Devin Nunes ,” referring to the California congressman who defends Trump no matter what the cost. “Is this the price now to be paid for currying favor in Trump World?” he asked. He called Kennedy’s — and others’ — Ukraine election claims “flat-out BS.”

The insistence that Ukraine — and not Russia — interfered in the 2016 election serves to distract attention from the Kremlin just as officials warn Russia is already taking action to manipulate the 2020 U.S. election, critics warn.


Former White House Russia analyst Fiona Hill testified last month before the House Intelligence Committee that the story that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election is “a  fictional narrative  that has been perpetrated and  propagated by the Russian security services  themselves.”

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Sunday called Republican lawmakers the “ most important global asset”  of Russian intelligence.

Check out the rest of the MSNBC video up top on Republicans pulling the Moscow party line.

Also on HuffPost











004e056aee643618c95d5629f618cbc6



Witness Obliterates Republican Conspiracy Theory


The National Security Council’s former Russia expert torched a Republican conspiracy theory that it was Ukraine - and not Moscow - that interfered in the 2016 election.








Love HuffPost? Become a founding member of HuffPost Plus today.

This article originally appeared on  HuffPost .










Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
Tessylo
1  seeder  Tessylo    one week ago

Wallace, confused by Republicans’ insistence on pushing claims by Putin in “defiance of facts” uncovered by U.S. intelligence officials, was referring to an unfounded claim in a dossier gathered by former British intelligence agent    Christopher Steele    that    Donald Trump    watched prostitutes engage in “   golden showers   ” in a Moscow hotel room in 2013. Such tapes could be used as blackmail, Wallace was insinuating — though not seriously. But how else to explain Republicans’ strange insistence on stories that serve Putin’s aims?

Wallace guest and    Bulwark    editor    Charlie Sykes    accused Sen.    John Kennedy    (R-La.) of coming off as an “addled Russian asset” when he claimed Sunday on MSNBC that former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko “actively worked” for Hillary Clinton to skew the American election on her behalf. When an astounded Chuck Todd asked for the basis for Kennedy’s claim, the senator responded: “Just read the articles” — though he identified no “articles.” An exasperated Todd responded: “C’mon!” 

Sykes, a conservative commentator and author, had no explanation for why Kennedy did a “full    Devin Nunes   ,” referring to the California congressman who defends Trump no matter what the cost. “Is this the price now to be paid for currying favor in Trump World?” he asked. He called Kennedy’s — and others’ — Ukraine election claims “flat-out BS.”

The insistence that Ukraine — and not Russia — interfered in the 2016 election serves to distract attention from the Kremlin just as officials warn Russia is already taking action to manipulate the 2020 U.S. election, critics warn.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

KDMichigan
JBB
Sunshine
Wishful_thinkin
jungkonservativ111
Gordy327
Ozzwald
Tessylo
Ronin2
SteevieGee

bccrane
Freefaller
Just Jim NC TttH
Texan1211
loki12


32 visitors