Hiroshima buildings that survived atomic bomb to be demolished

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  8 months ago  •  5 comments

Hiroshima buildings that survived atomic bomb to be demolished
The Japanese city of Hiroshima plans to knock down two buildings that survived the 1945 atomic bomb - but some locals want them preserved as landmarks. The two blocks - built in 1913 - were first used as a military clothing factory, and later as university student accommodation. They were also used as a makeshift hospital after the bomb itself.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Hiroshima buildings that survived atomic bomb to be demolished
















_110157611_008ac5c5-1789-4473-a7e1-38cd2 A Google street view picture with a warning that the building is not earthquake safe

The Japanese city of Hiroshima plans to knock down two buildings that survived the 1945 atomic bomb - but some locals want them preserved as landmarks.

The two blocks - built in 1913 - were first used as a   military clothing factory , and later as university student accommodation.

They were also used as a makeshift hospital after the bomb itself.

"They could be used as facilities toward (promoting) the abolition of nuclear weapons," said one survivor.

Around 80,000 people were killed as a direct result of the bomb, and another 35,000 were injured.

The attack flattened most of the city, and - as of last year - only 85 buildings built before the bomb remained within five kilometres of "ground zero".

The blocks survived, at least partly because they were made from reinforced concrete. Some bomb damage to the metal windows and doors is still visible.

In 2017, authorities found the structures - now publicly-owned - were highly likely to collapse in a strong earthquake.

And - as the buildings are not in use, and are not open to the public - the local government decided they should be demolished by 2022.

A third building at the site will be preserved, and its walls and roof will be repaired and reinforced to protect it from earthquakes.

_108197244_hi001453910.jpg Image copyright AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Image caption The atomic bomb destroyed thousands of buildings in Hiroshima

Iwao Nakanishi, 89, was in one of the buildings when the city was bombed. He is now the head of a local group demanding the preservation of the buildings.

"Considering the historical significance of telling the tragedy to the future generation, we can no way accept the demolition," he told the Mainichi newspaper. "We strongly oppose it."

Mr Nakanishi said the buildings could be used to promote "the abolition of nuclear weapons".

In recent years, they have not been used - although visits were possible via the local authority.

"These are valuable buildings that are telling us the horror of the atomic bomb," one 69-year-old who visited the site told Hiroshima paper Yomiuri.

"I felt strongly after looking at them directly for the first time so I want all of them to be preserved."

Hiroshima's most famous ruin from the bomb is the dome in the city's Peace Memorial Park.

A Unesco World Heritage site, it has undergone reinforcement work to make it more earthquake resistant.

_110157610_0d726686-1136-44f7-9589-20b93 Image copyright GETTY IMAGES
Image caption The ruin of the Genbaku dome is preserved as a memorial

What happened in Hiroshima?


After Germany had surrendered in May 1945, Japan continued the war in Asia.

The US hoped that dropping a nuclear bomb - after Japan rejected an earlier ultimatum for peace - would force a quick surrender without risking US casualties on the ground.

The first bomb, dropped on Hiroshima, killed an estimated 140,000 people in total, once long-term radiation illness was taken into account.

The attack was the first time a nuclear weapon was used during a war.

When no immediate surrender came from the Japanese, US forces dropped a second bomb three days later, on the city of Nagasaki.

Japan surrendered six days later and officially brought about the end of World War Two.



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
JohnRussell
1  seeder  JohnRussell    8 months ago

I would leave the buildings up for a while, another hundred years or so. They have profound historic value. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 months ago
I would leave the buildings up for a while, another hundred years or so. They have profound historic value.

I have to disagree.  They should be left standing in perpetuity as a reminder for all.

Now, having said that, I can understand both sides of the issue and will of course respect the decision the locals make for themselves.

 
 
 
Ender
2  Ender    8 months ago

A little off topic yet they have a temple that they rebuild every twenty years.

Something about rebirth.

 
 
 
Freefaller
3  Freefaller    8 months ago

Progress marches on

 
 
 
It Is ME
4  It Is ME    8 months ago

Hell..… Set them up as "New Apartment living". It would be the "Safest Place on the Planet" to live. They still stand, even after a Nuclear Blast !!!!! jrSmiley_36_smiley_image.gif

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


loki12
SteevieGee
JohnRussell
Ender
Sunshine
Gordy327
Save Me Jebus


37 visitors