╌>

'Don The Con, You're Fired!' Trump Gets A Blunt Message At His Own Rally

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  5 years ago  •  252 comments

By:   Ed Mazza Huffpost

'Don The Con, You're Fired!' Trump Gets A Blunt Message At His Own Rally

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Politics

'Don The Con, You're Fired!' Trump Gets A Blunt Message At His Own Rally







1b7bcfa0-ffe6-11e8-abbe-535ccd54ed26 December 18, 2019, 10:29 PM EST







5dfadfb7240000e70c5a3c21.jpg

'Don The Con, You're Fired!' Trump Gets A Blunt Message At His Own Rally

President  Donald Trump  got an unexpected message at  his own rally  on Wednesday night after protesters unfurled a banner as he was speaking.  

“Don the Con, you’re fired!” said the banner unfurled at the event in Battle Creek, Michigan, as the House voted to impeach the president. 

Trump demanded that the protesters be removed, although he seemed to notice only one of them ― perhaps because she was giving him the double bird as she was escorted out.

Or, as Trump later called it, “a horrible gesture with the wrong finger.” 

A second protester waved his hat as he left, but Trump appeared fixated on the woman.

“Get her out,” he said. “Get her out of here.”  

The crowd booed and chanted “USA!” as the protesters were escorted out. 

Trump called the woman “a real slob” and “a disgusting person,” and he said, “She’ll get hell when she gets back home with Mom.” 

Then he complained that security officers at the event were “so politically correct” and didn’t grab her by the wrists as they took her out. 

“You gotta get a little bit stronger than that, folks,” he griped as the crowd cheered. 

Trump also  complained of “politically correct” security  at an event last week when a woman entered a pen near the stage with a banner reading “Grabbing power back.”

She also gave him the finger. 





Article is LOCKED by moderator [smarty_function_ntUser_get_name: user_id or profile_id parameter required]
[]
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Tessylo    5 years ago

jrSmiley_81_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

Fuck tRump!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Tessylo    5 years ago

'Trump called the woman “a real slob” and “a disgusting person,”

Always the projection with this 'president'

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

This is a seeded article from the Huffington Post. It is interesting to see it on the front page.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    5 years ago

Why?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1    5 years ago

Seeded stories from other sources don't belong under the banner of Columnists. It is not your fault. It is a glitch. They need to fix it.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    5 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.2    5 years ago

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
3.1.4  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    5 years ago
(deleted)
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @3.1.4    5 years ago

I'll have TiG explain it to you.  It's like putting Nancy Pelosi's name underneath the heading "Republicans". 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.6  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.5    5 years ago

I see how much it bothered you that I had something on top of yours.

Very petty.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.8  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @3.1    5 years ago

It’s a part of the double standard here between what can be used here from the far edge mainstream left compared to the far edge mainstream right per our board of censors.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.9  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.8    5 years ago

What does that have to do with anything?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
3.2  Krishna  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    5 years ago
This is a seeded article from the Huffington Post. It is interesting to see it on the front page.

Yes-- absolutely fascinating!

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Participates
4  Citizen Kane-473667    5 years ago

IDK, I think the sparks that flew at Shifty Schiffs townhall meeting were much more entertaining!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
4.1  Dulay  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @4    5 years ago
IDK, I think the sparks that flew at Shifty Schiffs townhall meeting were much more entertaining!

That meeting was organized by the Armenian National Committee of America, Western Region, to celebrate the passage of legislation recognizing the Armenian genocide and get information on the legislation. It wasn't a 'political' townhall. 

I can't help but wonder if you would be just as 'entertained' by liberals protesting when Republican speaks at the Jewish Federations of North America.   

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  Dulay @4.1    5 years ago
I can't help but wonder if you would be just as 'entertained' by liberals protesting when Republican speaks at the Jewish Federations of North America.

Are they going to be smacking people around? Shoving women like they did at Shifty Shiff's  shindig? If so, then Hell YEAH, let;s go watch it on YouTube!  It's almost as much fun as watching catfights and Funny Fails!

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
5  The Magic 8 Ball    5 years ago
You're Fired!

"fired" as in he is still president and will be re-elected.

the lunatic left cracks me up.

thanks for my daily laugh :)

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @5    5 years ago

We'll see if your whackjob pronouncement comes true.  We'll see.  

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
5.1.1  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  Tessylo @5.1    5 years ago
We'll see.  

you got that right.  

because you will.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @5.1.1    5 years ago

We'll see, we'll see.

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
5.1.4  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.2    5 years ago

if there was a real case against trump the house would be in a hurry to send the impeachment to the senate .  but they are scared to do so because they have nothing but supposition, speculation, and innuendo.  and that simply aint enough.

I suggest you start at the beginning. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.5  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @5.1.3    5 years ago

We'll see.  We'll see.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.6  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @5.1.4    5 years ago

Get the fuck out of here with your Breitfart bullshit.  

 
 
 
katrix
Sophomore Participates
5.1.7  katrix  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @5.1.4    5 years ago

Stop listening to right wing lies. Breitbart - that explains why your comments are generally so fact-averse.

Today, we happen to need some budget decisions to avoid a government shutdown. Believe it or not, that's more important.

And since McConnell and Graham have already stated that they will violate their oaths to be impartial jurors, Pelosi rightly wants to delay to see what can be done to get them to do their fucking jobs.

Apparently, utter disdain for oaths and the Constitution is now a general trait of GOP officials, not just limited to Trump. They are piss poor Americans.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  katrix @5.1.7    5 years ago
Stop listening to right wing lies.

The McConnell speech was carried correctly, right?  There is no need to attack the source. I know you know that. 


Today, we happen to need some budget decisions to avoid a government shutdown. Believe it or not, that's more important.

You are 100% right.


And since McConnell and Graham have already stated that they will violate their oaths to be impartial jurors

Projection. It's not worthy of you, Kat.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.10  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @5.1.4    5 years ago

What makes you think I'd look at your whackjob Breitfart video?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.11  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  katrix @5.1.7    5 years ago
Today, we happen to need some budget decisions to avoid a government shutdown. Believe it or not, that's more important.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.12  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.6    5 years ago
Get the fuck out of here with your Breitfart bullshit.  

So actual video scares you....

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
5.1.13  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.10    5 years ago
What makes you think I'd look at your whackjob Breitfart video?

I prefer you didn't...

watching the lefts "we got trump" charade is more fun.

please continue :)

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
5.1.14  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  XDm9mm @5.1.3    5 years ago

Think they will want mustard and ketchup with all that crow they will have to eat????

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.15  XXJefferson51  replied to  katrix @5.1.7    5 years ago

You really think his recorded comments would have come out differently if seeded from another news source?  😂 Long live Breitbart, a great and valuable source for news.   I strongly recommend them.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.16  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.10    5 years ago

What makes you think that the senators words would have come out differently from another source.  That is why the use of a rating system for news organizations is so irredeemably stupid and ignorant.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.17  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.16    5 years ago

Let it go.  Move along [now  .delete]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.18  XXJefferson51  replied to  bugsy @5.1.12    5 years ago

They think that slapping that CNS, WND, or Breitbart label on it is going to make it say something else or contaminate the site by its mere presence here.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.19  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.15    5 years ago

Breitfart.   It's a source that's not even allowed here for an article or seed.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.20  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @5.1.13    5 years ago
'I prefer you didn't...'

Then stop posting that shit and all your whackjob shit on my seeds then.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.21  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.17    5 years ago

[deleted,] I will not let it go or move along.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.22  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.19    5 years ago

As a seed, true.  That’s why we go to another source and seed an article that isn’t theirs but quotes extensively from their reporting. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.23  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.20    5 years ago

What?  You can’t stand seeing opposition points of view in your echo chamber?

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
5.1.24  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @5.1.12    5 years ago
So actual video scares you....

Wow. Far-reaching. And funnier than hell ... !

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
5.1.25  cobaltblue  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.15    5 years ago
I strongly recommend them.  

Heartland, every time I see you and your commentary, I merely shrug because it's what you rely upon and to each his own. However, I do worry that you have children and you seem to spend more time here than with those children you adopted and fostered and now care for. While I commend you that you foster children, I hope you realize they have come from difficult circumstances. When the government gets involved in family issues and takes those children away for neglect, they need more care and love and support than ever. I hope you ultimately spend more time with them than you do spreading rhetoric from an unreliable and conspiracy driven website as you do on this forum.

Regarding Breitbart:

[Brietbart was] [s]elf- conceived  as set in opposition to what it derided as the “political correctness” of “social justice warriors” on the left, the alt-right was deeply influenced by  chan culture  in particular; trolling (the art of tricking people to get a rise or reaction out of them) and the widespread use of racist and homophobic slurs were cultural phenomena within the alt-right driven by the anonymity of the communities in which its proponents had come of age. 

Cite

Please. Give those children what they deserve. Time and attention. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.26  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.22    5 years ago

Would you fucking let it go goddamnit?

Enough already 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.27  XXJefferson51  replied to  cobaltblue @5.1.25    5 years ago

I do a very good job with the children I work with and live with.  Just because I don’t log out doesn’t mean I’m always here. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.28  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.26    5 years ago

No

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
5.2  cobaltblue  replied to  The Magic 8 Ball @5    5 years ago
"fired" as in he is still president and will be re-elected.

At least people will have to acknowledge that their voting for a crook and are as morally rudderless as their president.

EMIXDAIUEAAqgLJ?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
5.2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  cobaltblue @5.2    5 years ago

morally rudderless"

and utterly ethically challenged

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
6  Dean Moriarty    5 years ago

I hadn’t realized he was attracting that many supporters to his rallies this early in the campaign. Looks like he’s off to a strong start. 

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
6.1  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  Dean Moriarty @6    5 years ago

trump fill stadiums while the left can barely fill a gymnasium... LOL

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Dean Moriarty @6    5 years ago

His latest KKK rally drew lots of deplorables.  

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.1  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @6.2    5 years ago

There were 3 African American women in the backdrop last night. Now, I know the leftists will say they are props, but even if they were, are they members of the kkk?

You seem to think so.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @6.2.1    5 years ago

I wonder how much he paid the African-Americans to be there?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.5  seeder  Tessylo  replied to    5 years ago

But you're only half black MUVA.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
6.2.7  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.2    5 years ago
I wonder how much he paid the African-Americans to be there?

Speaking of "Paying African Americans", or any other minority that is needed to get elected...… "VOTE BLUE" !

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.2.8  Ronin2  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.5    5 years ago

Disparaging his ethnicity? How nice.

Whatever happened to the left's, "you are what you think you are BS?" Or does that only apply to those on the left?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.9  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @6.2.8    5 years ago

I'm not disparaging anything.  MUVA has said himself many times that he is half black.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.10  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.2    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.2.11  Trout Giggles  replied to    5 years ago

So you admit that people set aside their dignity to attend a trmp rally!

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.12  cobaltblue  replied to    5 years ago
It's kind of racist that you would think that African Americans would sell their dignity for money

Trumplethinskin didn't even have to pay his supporters and tons of his fellow republicans shit for selling their dignity and moral compass. At least he paid his porn stars to be fucked by him. His supporters and his sycophants are bending over for free. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.13  cobaltblue  replied to    5 years ago
Like Obama? 

Just like Obama. Your point? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
6.2.14  It Is ME  replied to  cobaltblue @6.2.12    5 years ago
Trumplethinskin didn't even have to pay his supporters

Tada !

In the mean time....Liberalthinskins DO PAY their supporters....with others money ! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.17  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.5    5 years ago
But you're only half black MUVA.

So is Obama. Difference is Obama hated his white side...and everything about it.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
6.2.18  It Is ME  replied to  bugsy @6.2.17    5 years ago
Difference is Obama hated his white side...and everything about it.

Well.....to be a bit honest here....it was the "LEFT" that wanted to ignore that point.

Obama just went along with it.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.19  cobaltblue  replied to    5 years ago
Daniels ended up paying trump 130,000.00 for that romp

Ha! Seems you missed the point where he rawdogged a porn star hooker right after his third wife gave birth. Wouldn't you rather he paid no mistress/hooker/porn star a dime or she have to pay him at all? Wtf??!?! The fact that any money had to pass hands is shameful. If he screwed his daughter (since he made several videos and audios stating his desire for his daughter), he probably wouldn't have had to pay a thing. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.20  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.2    5 years ago
I wonder how much he paid the African-Americans to be there?

IF it were true, (and I notice you provide absolutely no evidence to support your ridiculous claim), then it must mean that Trump IS creating jobs!!

LMAO!

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.21  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @6.2.17    5 years ago
Difference is Obama hated his white side...and everything about it

I hadn't realized you guys were so close that he shared that with you. Did you share Thanksgiving meals together or did you just hang out? 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.22  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  cobaltblue @6.2.19    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.23  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.22    5 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.24  bugsy  replied to  cobaltblue @6.2.21    5 years ago
I hadn't realized you guys were so close that he shared that with you.

Don't need to be close to know this. In his book, he berated his "white grandmother" and was a proud member of Reverend Wright's black theology liberation church. Only reason why he condemned the "Reverend" is because he had to.

He thinks Biden is an idiot (he is), but picked him as a VP just to get the white vote, because he HAD to have it.

Similar thing will happen with whoever gets the dem nomination. Whoever it is will pick a minority simply to get the black vote. They know Trump has 35 percent support of the black vote now. To them it's all about race.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.25  bugsy  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.23    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
6.2.26  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.2.11    5 years ago

So you admit that people set aside their dignity to attend a trmp rally!

the locker/coat check room would need to be bigger than the arena to hold all the set aside dignity

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.28  cobaltblue  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.23    5 years ago
Got any proof of this outlandish claim?

Got any proof he didn't? According to IIM, if one is innocent, they don't have to prove their innocence. They just get to sit back and see if they're found guilty. Well, he was found guilty with the documentation produced. So Trumplethinskin chose to keep all documentation that would exonerate him of all claims because ... well ... he didn't have to. 

Ha!

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.29  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @6.2.25    5 years ago
removed for context [ph]

Oh my. That's a wee bit impolite. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.30  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @6.2.24    5 years ago
'They know Trump has 35 percent support of the black vote now.'

PROVE IT

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
6.2.31  Dulay  replied to  bugsy @6.2.1    5 years ago
There were 3 African American women in the backdrop last night.

Yes there was. Did you notice their reaction to Trump's disgusting remarks about Dingle? 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.2.32  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.30    5 years ago

Emerson and Rasmussen good enough for you? I really doubt it and you don't click on links anyway...........especially if they give you exactly what you ask for.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.33  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.2.32    5 years ago

The Washington Examiner?

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.2.34  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.33    5 years ago

"When ya got nothing, dispute the source."

Hard to tell from here. Pot or kettle.

 
 
 
Karri
Freshman Silent
6.2.35  Karri  replied to  bugsy @6.2.24    5 years ago
They know Trump has 35 percent support of the black vote now.

I tried to confirm this, but I could not.  The latest poll I could find (Gallup 11/20/19) states it is at 10%, remaining steady.  Can you give me a more recent poll that says it is at 35%?

 
 
 
Karri
Freshman Silent
6.2.37  Karri  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @6.2.32    5 years ago
Emerson and Rasmussen good enough for you? I really doubt it and you don't click on links anyway...........especially if they give you exactly what you ask for.

Well, I did -- and I read it.  About half-way through the article, they discussed the small sample which could lead to large errors.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.38  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.30    5 years ago
PROVE IT

For once I wish you would start paying attention to what is going on around you. There are other publications that do not start with "Far left loon (fill in the blank)".

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.39  bugsy  replied to  Dulay @6.2.31    5 years ago
Did you notice their reaction to Trump's disgusting remarks about Dingle? 

And? So what? Who has said they support what he said? It was a stupid comment, but with 94 percent negative press coverage over 3 years, even with all of the accomplishments the press refuses to report, he has the right to defend himself.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.40  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.33    5 years ago

Says the one that uses HuffPo and the Independent regularly

 
 
 
Karri
Freshman Silent
6.2.41  Karri  replied to    5 years ago

First of all, Newsday is known for its bias.  Second of all, it was an opinion piece.  So I went to the Emerson site and could not find the poll you referenced.  I'd like to see the sample size and margin of error.  It is strange to me that polls have a very steady number and then you have a couple of polls with a 300% increase in favorability. Honestly, it sounds like an outlier.  Let's wait for a few more polls.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.2.44  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Karri @6.2.41    5 years ago

Yes, newsday is bias.............

LEFT-CENTER BIAS
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.  These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

Overall, we rate Newsday Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

 
 
 
Karri
Freshman Silent
6.2.46  Karri  replied to    5 years ago

Umm, my objection was not based on the source; if you read my comment, I discussed the differences between this ad other polls.    Also, I am not saying it is wrong; I am saying lets wait and see.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.48  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Karri @6.2.37    5 years ago

Folks like Jim are always posting stuff that never supports their claims, EVER

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.49  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @6.2.38    5 years ago

Again you're posting something, like Jim, that doesn't support your claim

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.50  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @6.2.40    5 years ago

Huffpost and the independent have never failed a fact check.

Yours often do

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.51  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @6.2.39    5 years ago

The press coverage is so negative because the shitstain never does anything positive 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
6.2.52  Dulay  replied to  bugsy @6.2.39    5 years ago
And? So what?

Their reaction was shock. 

Who has said they support what he said? It was a stupid comment, but with 94 percent negative press coverage over 3 years, even with all of the accomplishments the press refuses to report, he has the right to defend himself.

WHO was he defending himself from? Dingle has been DEAD for 10 months now. Is Trump STILL threatened by him? 

Oh and BTFW, YOU just supported what he said by defending it. Well done. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.2.53  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.5    5 years ago

That is one pretty low comment even for you! I think you seriously owe MUVA an apology!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.54  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @6.2.53    5 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.55  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.50    5 years ago
Huffpost and the independent have never failed a fact check.

Like I said to you before...

When a loony left site "fact checks" another loony left site, they don't dare fail one of thier own.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.56  bugsy  replied to  Dulay @6.2.52    5 years ago
YOU just supported what he said by defending it. Well done. 

Only in your mind....which does not say much.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.2.57  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.54    5 years ago

I have serious doubts you even know what a ditty bag is!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.58  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @6.2.57    5 years ago

I wouldn't have used the phrase if I didn't know what it meant Doc.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
6.2.60  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.58    5 years ago

Yep, that was probably after you had google naval terminology...😆

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
6.2.61  Dulay  replied to  bugsy @6.2.56    5 years ago
Only in your mind....which does not say much.

Nope, from your own words.

The press is mean to Trump, even though he's accomplished so much, so he has a right to defend himself against a dead man. 

Defending the man child's petulance equates to supporting it. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.62  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Karri @6.2.37    5 years ago

I bet they only polled republicons and tRump supporters in that small sample.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.63  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @6.2.60    5 years ago

Whatever doc, [delete

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
6.2.64  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.5    5 years ago
But you're only half black MUVA.

"Only"? What does that even mean in 2019? A "half black" man became the POTUS in 2008. There are also several other POTUSs who allegedly had black ancestry. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.65  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Jasper2529 @6.2.64    5 years ago

I don't know why y'all continue to beat a dead horse.

[Deleted]

[From the CoC:] [Common abbreviations such as STFU, FU, and GFYS are considered personal derogatory attacks and are forbidden.]

[Further violation of this portion of the CoC will result in suspension.]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.66  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @6.2    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.67  XXJefferson51  replied to    5 years ago

touche’

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.68  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.2.67    5 years ago

More like douche

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.69  cobaltblue  replied to  Karri @6.2.46    5 years ago
I am saying lets wait and see.

You're fuckin' awesome.

The absurdity of their rush to judgment is what hurts them when they suffer what they perceive to be a loss. The wait and see approach will keep most people from appearing foolish. For instance, Donald Jr.'s Tweet That Hasn't Aged Well

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.70  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  cobaltblue @6.2.69    5 years ago

'The absurdity of their rush to judgment is what hurts them when they suffer what they perceive to be a loss. The wait and see approach will keep most people from appearing foolish. For instance, Donald Jr.'s  Tweet That Hasn't Aged Well'

Good Gawd the stupid moron didn't fall far from the incompetent fucking idiot tree.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.71  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.33    5 years ago

The Huffington Post?  😂😂🤣😁

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.72  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.48    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.73  XXJefferson51  replied to  bugsy @6.2.55    5 years ago

Exactly.  You are exactly right about that.  [deleted]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.74  bugsy  replied to  Dulay @6.2.61    5 years ago
The press is mean to Trump, even though he's accomplished so much, so he has a right to defend himself against a dead man. 

Shitty Schiff, is that you?

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.2.75  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @6.2.74    5 years ago
Shitty Schiff,

Ooooh. That's going to traumatize him for life. Because, like the rest of us, what you think of us is what matters most in the entire universe. Said no one ever. 

Insults are the last resort of woefully insecure people who are intellectually impotent. Relying on name calling is for those that haven't the capacity for rational, fundamentally accurate statements to support their position. It only detracts from credibility in all areas. Name calling is for the weak. Like Trump. And others ... 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.76  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @6.2    5 years ago

Impeachment was Nancy Pelosi’s KKK rally.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.77  XXJefferson51  replied to  bugsy @6.2.55    5 years ago

Without a doubt.  You are right on.  I strongly support and agree with your comment.  ICFN is the ultimate in pro left lamestream media bias and bigotry along with all groups and individuals associated with it.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.78  Texan1211  replied to  cobaltblue @6.2.28    5 years ago
Got any proof he didn't? 

Come on, you're smarter than that. You know the person making the claim should be able to prove it.

According to IIM, if one is innocent, they don't have to prove their innocence. They just get to sit back and see if they're found guilty. Well, he was found guilty with the documentation produced. So Trumplethinskin chose to keep all documentation that would exonerate him of all claims because ... well ... he didn't have to. 

Perhaps I was giving too much credit than what is due here.

When on trial, it is on the prosecution to prove the case. The accused doesn't have to do a thing.

See, I COULD say that Hillary pimped her daughter out to her own husband, but that doesn't make it true, and I strongly suspect you would demand proof of such a scurrilous claim. And rightly so.

That's all I'm doing here.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.79  Texan1211  replied to  cobaltblue @6.2.75    5 years ago
nsults are the last resort of woefully insecure people who are intellectually impotent. Relying on name calling is for those that haven't the capacity for rational, fundamentally accurate statements to support their position. It only detracts from credibility in all areas. Name calling is for the weak. 

I believe THIS is EXACTLY what you are referring to:

So Trumplethinskin chose to

Good point!

Too bad it was lost on its author.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
6.2.80  bugsy  replied to  cobaltblue @6.2.75    5 years ago

Wow....you sure did get triggered over 5 words....that were not even directed at you...

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.3  cobaltblue  replied to  Dean Moriarty @6    5 years ago
Looks like he’s off to a strong start. 

Good for him. It's good to know with that asterisked impeached next to his name, history will have to have a clearinghouse for his juvenile tweets, his lying about incidents that had been videotaped, his lechery for his daughter and his payoff to mistresses. 

I'm curious though. Perhaps you have an answer. If he's innocent and has the documentation to prove it and the witnesses to prove it, why has no one come forward? If he's not guilty, he sure as hell appears guilty. He could have testified. He could have allowed others to testify on his behalf. He could have turned over the documentation he says he has that prove his innocence. And why hasn't Giuliani brought forth all the evidence he has on the Bidens? Wouldn't this be an ideal time to turn documents over? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
6.3.1  It Is ME  replied to  cobaltblue @6.3    5 years ago
asterisked impeached next to his name

* Based on "Conjecture", "Innuendo" and "Feelings", President Trump was Impeached !

"If he's innocent and has the documentation to prove it and the witnesses to prove it, why has no one come forward?"

Because in THIS COUNTRY....the "Innocent" aren't required to prove anything. It's all on the "Accusers" shoulders to prove otherwise. The "Liberal Accusrs" .........FAILED "Legally", but seem to have won....."Politically" !

It's a good thing your everyday "Courts" aren't "political" huh !

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.3.2  cobaltblue  replied to  It Is ME @6.3.1    5 years ago
It's all on the "Accusers" shoulders to prove otherwise.

Omigawd. You've made that ridiculous argument before. Thank you. It  always  makes me laugh. 

EMHnlyuVAAA58-l?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
6.3.3  It Is ME  replied to  cobaltblue @6.3.2    5 years ago

OMG....you put up a MEME ! 

Thank you. It  always  makes me laugh. jrSmiley_100_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
6.3.5  cobaltblue  replied to    5 years ago
Only guilt has to be proven.

Since Trump refuses to let anyone testify to his innocence, since he's refused to hand over the document from the secret server, since he's refused to cooperate himself or allowed anyone else to cooperate with the investigation, then he's at the mercy of the evidence provided. He brought this upon himself.

It's akin to someone being charged with murder because there is fingerprint/dna evidentiary documentation and yet refusing to provide work records to prove you were someplace else at the time the murder was committed. If one refuses to help themselves, then the process proceeds the only way it can. 

So why do you think that Trump won't provide proof of his innocence when he claims he has scads of it? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
6.3.6  Dulay  replied to    5 years ago

So all the whining about 'due process' was about what exactly? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.3.7  XXJefferson51  replied to  cobaltblue @6.3.5    5 years ago

Trump recognizes separation of powers and appealed to the courts to settle differences/disputes between the two other branches and the House impeached him for it.  The defense owes the prosecution nothing.  It’s on the prosecution to prove guilt. Otherwise presumption of innocence prevails.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
8  It Is ME    5 years ago

'Don The Con, You're Fired!'

Nope !

Trump is "STILL" President.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
8.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  It Is ME @8    5 years ago

Keep America Great!

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
8.1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  XXJefferson51 @8.1    5 years ago

POOF! Another liberal's head imploded somewhere!

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
8.1.2  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @8.1.1    5 years ago
Another liberal's head imploded somewhere!

original

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
9  Texan1211    5 years ago

Isn't it cute how excited people can get over a freaking sign from some low-life losers?

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
9.1  cobaltblue  replied to  Texan1211 @9    5 years ago
Isn't it cute how excited people can get over a freaking sign from some low-life losers?

Adorable. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  cobaltblue @9.1    5 years ago

Really, it is totes adorbs

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
9.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @9.1.1    5 years ago

It really is.

Always fun to watch folks get all in a lather over something so trivial!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.3  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @9.1.2    5 years ago

I was talking about Cobalt Blue.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @9    5 years ago
'from some low-life losers'

Talking about the latest tRump rally?

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
10  cobaltblue    5 years ago

I hope some of you people here would have been outraged if Obama had done one-tenth of what traitorous Trump has done. Out of curiosity, would you think 'it ain't no thang' if Obama would have committed the same acts as Trump has committed? If Obama would have done an iota of what Trump has done, I would have immediately regretted my vote and would have hoped that he was impeached. 

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
10.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  cobaltblue @10    5 years ago

Obama traded five hard core terrorists for one worthless deserter. That was traitorous to me and many other vets who served honorably, but business as usual to the progressive liberal left.

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
10.2.1  cobaltblue  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @10.2    5 years ago
That was traitorous to me and many other vets who served honorably,

Pfft. Don't talk to me about vets who served honorably. Anyone who doesn't think that five time deferment, disappearing bone spurs Trump saying about McCain that he didn't like "people who were captured" was a disgusting comment have no room to talk. Please. Spare me your rhetoric. Anyone who doesn't bring up the fact that you, and others, fought to keep America from tyranny, fought to keep America a country that has the freedom to peacefully protest (instead of insisting that athletes be fired because of their form of peaceful protest), has it wrong. Those people should put on their MAGA hats and wear them proudly. Because all that MAGA means at this point is Manipulating America's Gullible Assholes. (Or, in the alternative, My Attorneys Got Arrested.)

Thank you for your service, by the way. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.2.2  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  cobaltblue @10.2.1    5 years ago

Also the recent remarks about Mr. Dingle who served for 59 years in Congress and died recently

His wife voted for impeachment so the 'president' said the honorable Mr. Dingle was in hell.

Fuck tRump.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
11  Texan1211    5 years ago

Do some folks actually believe that sign?

Do they not understand what impeachment is? How it works?

My God, the level of stupidity is incredible to see over some dumbass sign.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12  Texan1211    5 years ago

HuffPost--certainly NOT an unbiased site!

LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

 



 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12    5 years ago

When ya got nothing, dispute the source.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1    5 years ago
When ya got nothing, dispute the source.

Oh, Tessy. Tsk tsk tsk.

I didn't dispute the source. Did you actually believe I did?

There is no dispute that MBFC finds it to be thus.

Sorry if your source is biased.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.3  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.2    5 years ago

Yeah, you did dispute the source.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.3    5 years ago
Yeah, you did dispute the source.  

Well, then, in your own words, PROVE IT!

I merely pointed out how biased your source is. That isn't in dispute even from the Bible on bias here

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
12.1.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.4    5 years ago

luckly never any other bias posted around here

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.6  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.4    5 years ago

Yes, you did dispute the source.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
12.1.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @12.1    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.6    5 years ago

You can say it a million times, and it will be just as false the millionth time as it is the first.

LMMFAO!!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.9  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.8    5 years ago

Truth and reality and facts have a Liberal bias.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
12.1.10  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @12.1    5 years ago

Works for you on a regular basis.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.9    5 years ago
Truth and reality and facts have a Liberal bias

Yet another lie promoted by many Democrats.

Must be another day ending in a "y".

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.12  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.11    5 years ago

Another stupid retort from you.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.12    5 years ago

It's your lucky day!

I have a few spare moments to explain anything in my post you didn't understand!

Tell me what confused you and made you think it was stupid.

Perhaps I can clarify for you.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.14  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.13    5 years ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
12.1.15  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.14    5 years ago

So you aren't interested in learning?

Got it.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
12.1.16  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.15    5 years ago

Horse to water? Yep...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.17  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.15    5 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
12.1.18  cobaltblue  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.8    5 years ago
You can say it a million times, and it will be just as false the millionth time as it is the first.

Why, what a coincidence. That's as many times as you've been wrong.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.3  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @12    5 years ago

Facts and reality have a Liberal bias.  

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
12.3.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @12.3    5 years ago

🤣

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
14  Raven Wing    5 years ago

I find it rather humorous that the Repubs said Trump would NEVER be impeached. Now that he has been legally impeached, and now one of 3 U.S. presidents that have been impeached, and it is now a matter of U.S. history forever, they are trying their best to find another way to try to negate what has happened.

Whether or not Trump is removed from office makes no difference to the fact that he has been impeached, and will forever remain a part of America's sad history.

The stain of Trump's impeachment on both him, and out country, will never be removed, no matter how hard the right tries. 

And IMHO, the ones who are to blame for this debacle are the Republicans themselves. Trump was always obviously unfit for the job, a job he really did not want in the first place. But, once thrown into the Oval office, and fed the adulation of being the leader of one of the most powerful countries in the world, they used Trump as a puppet President and led him down the the path to his own destruction. 

Trump himself was used as much as he used others. His 'advisers' were mostly incompetent themselves, and those who were knowledgeable and experienced and could have led him in the right direction were soon tossed out by those who were afraid of losing control over him. 

In short, Trump has no one to blame for his ultimate impeachment but himself, and those who led him down a path they soon could not control.

No...I don't feel sorry for Trump, but, I also don't blame him alone for what will forever be his stain on American history. And McConnell, being the primary puppet master, is most to blame for a large part of what Trump will be have to bear for for the rest of his life. And Trump's  young Son will have to live in the shadow of the shame his Father has brought to America for his lifetime as well.

This is my own opinion. If you don't like it, that is on you, not me. I will not respond to any hate fests or gang banging from those who have supported the wrongful use of someone as mentally and emotionally weak as Trump's ego.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
14.2  bugsy  replied to  Raven Wing @14    5 years ago
Repubs said Trump would NEVER be impeached

Said no one...ever.

We know loon leftists have been calling for his impeachment since the day he rode down the escalator. Most of them ran on getting him impeached in 2018.  We have always maintained he will not get removed and he will be your president for another 5 years.

So far we are still correct.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
14.2.1  Raven Wing  replied to  bugsy @14.2    5 years ago
Said no one...ever.

Yes....many DID say that. Right here on NT. If you didn't say it, good for you. It's good you can think for yourself.

So far we are still correct

"So far".......and the full outcome is still yet to be seen.

As for the rest of your rote BS....Meh......par for the course. And I know that you don't speak for the majority of intelligent Republicans here in America. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
14.2.2  bugsy  replied to  Raven Wing @14.2.1    5 years ago
"So far".......and the full outcome is still yet to be seen.

I bet you still think Chris Christie is going to get indicted for "Bridgegate".....any day now...

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
14.2.3  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @14.2.2    5 years ago
Chris Christie is going to get indicted for "Bridgegate".

Don't give a shit about indictment. He threw his buddies under the bus and they sat in jail for him. And everyone still knows the truth. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
14.2.4  Raven Wing  replied to  bugsy @14.2.2    5 years ago
I bet you still think Chris Christie is going to get indicted for "Bridgegate"

I have no interest at all in Chris Christie. If all you have is ridiculous Trolling such as this, do not respond to me. I am not interested in your game.

 
 
 
Karri
Freshman Silent
14.2.5  Karri  replied to  bugsy @14.2    5 years ago
Most of them ran on getting him impeached in 2018. 

That's not what I remember.  It is also not backed up by the Dem's platform.  Voting rights, health care and campaign reform were much more dominant.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
14.3  pat wilson  replied to  Raven Wing @14    5 years ago

Very well said !

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
14.4  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Raven Wing @14    5 years ago

This is my own opinion. If you don't like it, that is on you, not me. I will not respond to any hate fests or gang banging from those who have supported the wrongful use of someone as mentally and emotionally weak as Trump's ego.

i WILL

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
14.4.1  Raven Wing  replied to  igknorantzrulz @14.4    5 years ago

jrSmiley_15_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
14.5  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Raven Wing @14    5 years ago

Actually, they have said impeachment would not mean removal from office, and it won't. The only other presidents impeached, i.e. Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, remained in office and completed their terms. Trump will also.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
14.5.1  bugsy  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @14.5    5 years ago
Trump will also.

Then get reelected in a landslide and serve a second successful term.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
14.5.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  bugsy @14.5.1    5 years ago

Then get reelected in a landslide and serve a second successful term.

Lets hope America isn't THAT IGNORANT

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
14.5.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  igknorantzrulz @14.5.2    5 years ago

America was ignorant enough to vote for his predecessor twice. We saw what happened with all his hope and change crap...🤣

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
14.5.4  cobaltblue  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @14.5    5 years ago
Trump will also.

Good for the traitorous liar who lusts after his own daughter. The right should be proud. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
14.5.5  cobaltblue  replied to  bugsy @14.5.1    5 years ago
Then get reelected in a landslide and serve a second successful term.

We shall see soon enough, won't we?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
14.5.7  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  cobaltblue @14.5.4    5 years ago

Is it wrong to be more sexually attracted to your own daughter than your wife?"

Ivanka was 13 years old at the time.

Donald tRump

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
15  seeder  Tessylo    5 years ago

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
15.1  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @15    5 years ago

That link says virus all over it.

 
 

Who is online

Ed-NavDoc
JohnRussell
MonsterMash


96 visitors