╌>

Tracking site suggests White House model is overestimating coronavirus hospitalizations

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  4 years ago  •  17 comments

By:   Daniel Payne

Tracking site suggests White House model is overestimating coronavirus hospitalizations
The discrepancies are also stark when looked at on a state-by-state basis. The model estimated that 65,434 patients would need hospital beds in New York State on Friday. In reality, there were 15,905 hospitalizations in that state by Sunday morning, according to the COVID Tracking Project.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



A Web site that tracks actual hospital beds in use suggests the model used by top White House health officials to project the trajectory of the coronavirus has so far  overestimated the number of Americans hospitalized by the disease by tens of thousands. 

Those projections, popularly known as the "Murray" model after the model's lead author, University of Washington professor Christopher Murray, were  explicitly cited  by Dr. Deborah Birx, the response coordinator for the White House's Coronavirus Task Force, at a press conference in the last week.

Birx told reporters that Murray's model, which predicts a shortage of tens of thousands of hospital beds throughout the country by the middle of April, underscored the task force's "concern that we had with the growing number of potential fatalities" based on the model's projections. 

Yet a comparison of actual hospitalized patients by state and nationally suggests the model has so far overestimated the number of beds needed to treat pandemic patients. 

The forecast  predicted , for example, that the United States would need around 164,750 hospital beds for COVID-19 patients on Saturday. Yet the COVID Tracking Project, a team of journalists and data analysts who collect and tabulate coronavirus data from state tallies around the country,  reported  only around 22,158 currently hospitalized coronavirus patients nationwide on Saturday.

The discrepancies are also stark when looked at on a state-by-state basis. The model estimated that 65,434 patients would need hospital beds in New York State on Friday. In reality, there were  15,905  hospitalizations in that state by Sunday morning, according to the COVID Tracking Project. 

Notably, the model touts its predictions as occurring under "full social distancing" through May of this year, meaning the projected hospitalizations are meant to occur even with significant quarantine measures. 

It is unclear why the model's numbers are so significantly higher than the actual numbers observed in hospitals across the country. Officials have offered explanations for various model fluctuations ranging from data assumptions to the impact of stay-at-home orders.

White House officials did not respond to requests for comment from Just the News. 

But at a White House press conference on Saturday, Birx said that coronavirus modelers are "re-evaluating all of their models in light of the level of the impact of the mitigation." 

"Just to be clear, we won't know how valid the models are until we move all the way through the epidemic," she said.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, meanwhile, reportedly said during a recent meeting that disease models "don’t tell you anything. You can’t really rely upon models."

Fauci has elsewhere indicated a preference for overestimating the possible effect of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States, telling reporters in March: "I think we should be overly aggressive and get criticized for overreacting."


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    4 years ago

This might quell the anxiety over ventilators!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2  Krishna    4 years ago

A Web site that tracks actual hospital beds in use suggests the model used by top White House health officials to project the trajectory of the coronavirus has so far  overestimated the number of Americans hospitalized by the disease by tens of thousands.

That's strange...because I saw several websites that track that sort of thing...and they all "suggested" that (not surprisingly) the figures used by the White House grossly underestimated those numbers! 

(And "Many people are saying" that that may actually increase the anxiety over ventilators!).

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Krishna @2    4 years ago

I wonder what sites?

Please give us some links

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    4 years ago

I think whatever discrepancy between the model and the actual number of hospitalizations is likely explained by many people who were expected to go to the hospital emergency room or call an ambulance have decided to tough it out at home. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3    4 years ago

Lol!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    4 years ago

LOL to you too. You dont think there are people who the model predicted would need hospitalization who never called 911 or had someone drive them to the emergency room because they decided they would tough it out on their own? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    4 years ago

I doubt there would be many of those. It seems as though some here are enjoying the panic.

There is strong evidence that these models have overestimated the hospital crisis

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    4 years ago

By the way, there are news reports this morning suggesting that the number of U.S. dead from coronavirus is being under reported. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4    4 years ago

A conspiracy theory!!!!

Link please

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    4 years ago

It's not a conspiracy theory Vic, thats your job.    It's bureaucracy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    4 years ago
thats your job.

Let's not get personal...That seems to be a bad habit of your's.


Just give us the link

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
4.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.2    4 years ago

[removed.]

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    4 years ago

That's because those bastards are trying to downplay the virus!

Oh wait. that's not how "downplay" works. Um never mind.

(Betcha didn't know I did impressions.)

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
5.1  Thrawn 31  replied to  Tacos! @5    4 years ago

[removed]

 
 

Who is online




38 visitors