State Department DENIES Hillary Clinton’s Attempt To Avoid Deposition

  
Via:  surfs-up  •  2 months ago  •  142 comments

State Department DENIES Hillary Clinton’s Attempt To Avoid Deposition
The State Department, represented in court by Justice Department lawyers, declined to join Clinton’s legal argument on Friday.

320


The court also ordered the deposition of Mills and two other State Department officials. Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-doj-tells-appeals-court-it-should-reject-clinton-effort-to-avoid-testimony/


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth said.

Judge Lamberth also described her previous rounds of questioning on the issue as unsatisfactory, explaining that her answers were “either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best.”

Now that the government has refused to back Hillary Clinton’s attempt to avoid sworn testimony over her private email server, it is only a matter of time before the former Secretary of State must appear in court for questioning.

https://trendingpolitics.com/court-rejects-hillary-clinton-s-attempt-to-avoid-deposition/


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
The Magic Eight Ball
1  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball    2 months ago

this will be fun to watch :)

 
 
 
cjcold
1.1  cjcold  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @1    2 months ago

So how many times has the far right wing already investigated Hillary?

How many times has she already testified?

Seems the far right is just looking to deflect from Trump's many crimes.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
1.1.1  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 months ago
So how many times has the far right wing already investigated Hillary?

this is not a new investigation it has been going on for yrs.

besides, at this point what difference does it make?

LOL

 
 
 
Ender
1.1.2  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @1.1.1    2 months ago

Can't find anything, look and look again.

So the excuse this time is they didn't like her answers to why she had a server.

Well maybe because it wasn't against any protocol back then?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1.3  igknorantzrulz  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @1.1.1    2 months ago
besides, at this point what difference does it make?

Exactly!

What Fckn difference does or will it make as there is obviously NOTHING more pressing...

besides, maybe

ANOTHER FCKN BENGHAZI INVESTIGATION,

while their at it !

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
1.1.4  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @1.1.2    2 months ago
Well maybe because it wasn't against any protocol back then?

then she has nothing to worry about.

well, except for the fact she is walking into a perjury trap.

but hey, she is honest as the day is long so no worries right?

 
 
 
Ender
1.1.5  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @1.1.4    2 months ago

So you admit they are trying to trap her and get her on anything they can...

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 months ago
Seems the far right is just looking to deflect from Trump's many crimes.

Oh, FFS, Every time anyone does anything to one of the left's heroes or heroines, someone has to start whining about how it's all about deflecting away from Trump.

Can you not understand that Hillary and Trump aren't related?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
1.1.7  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @1.1.5    2 months ago
So you admit they are trying to trap her

of course.... the same thing the left does to trump daily.

is good fun huh?

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @1.1.4    2 months ago

Kind of funny that some are whining because it is an old case.

Damn sure didn't make a difference to them regarding Kavanaugh!

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
1.1.9  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.8    2 months ago
Kind of funny that some are whining because it is an old case.

stall for as long as possible then declare it old news / already settled... 

they are predictable like that

 
 
 
Ronin2
1.1.10  Ronin2  replied to  Ender @1.1.2    2 months ago

The left should take their own advise; but Trruuummmmppppp!!!!!!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
1.1.11  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 months ago
How many times has she already testified?

None that I remember, under oath that is.............you have something different?

 
 
 
PJ
1.1.12  PJ  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 months ago

It's sad and pathetic.

 
 
 
Sparty On
1.1.13  Sparty On  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 months ago

Lol .... if Hillary gets scrutinized like Trump has been for the last three years she is french toast.   No doubt about it.  

The Deep State that was protecting her during her investigations has largely been rooted out and shit-canned.

No more help from deep state Obama toadies ..... bad dream for the Hill ......

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
1.1.14  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 months ago
So how many times has the far right wing already investigated Hillary?

Too many to times to count. A lot more than any other Politician that I know of beginning way back in her Arkansas days.  Funny how it is always her underlings that get convicted while she knows nothing about anything--even though several tell-all books have said otherwise...

How many times has she already testified?

Candidly?  0 It looks like this time she is facing a judge she doesn't have any dirt on though:

Judge Lamberth also described her previous rounds of questioning on the issue as unsatisfactory, explaining that her answers were “either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best.” Seems the far right is just looking to deflect from Trump's many crimes.

Maybe, but since those actions pre-date Trump, she has no one to blame but herself.

 
 
 
devangelical
1.1.15  devangelical  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1.14    2 months ago
Funny how it is always her underlings that get convicted while she knows nothing about anything-

gee, change the gender designation in that sentence and it sounds very familiar to today...

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
1.1.16  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  devangelical @1.1.15    2 months ago

I'm sure if we stuck dumbass under the same microscope we try to get her under, there would be a lot of dirt to find. What we ought to do is put EVERY Politicians through a thorough background check for corruption and amorality check every 2 years.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
1.1.17  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @1.1.16    2 months ago

I'm sure if we stuck dumbass under the same microscope we try to get her under, there would be a lot of dirt to find. What we ought to do is put EVERY Politicians through a thorough background check for corruption and amorality check every 2 years.

WOW,

thorough agreement.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.18  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.11    2 months ago

You have a piss poor memory

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.1.19  Tessylo  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.13    2 months ago

Deep State?

 
 
 
JBB
1.1.20  JBB  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.18    2 months ago

It has been over seven years since Mrs Clinton has even held any public office. Seven Years! 

 
 
 
Sparty On
1.1.21  Sparty On  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.19    2 months ago

Google it and talk amongst yourselves ..... let me know when you're ready to discuss it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.22  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @1.1.20    2 months ago
It has been over seven years since Mrs Clinton has even held any public office. Seven Years! 

I haven't seen anyone debating that fact.

WTF does it have to do with anything?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
1.1.23  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  cjcold @1.1    2 months ago
Seems the far right is just looking to deflect from Trump's many crimes.

The Democrats investigated Trump's "crimes" and come up empty.  So please enlighten us all and list these "crimes" with corroborating evidence.  Because apparently Bobbie Mueller missed them.

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @1    2 months ago

Another whackjob hit piece on Hillary.

YAWN

 
 
 
Split Personality
2  Split Personality    2 months ago
it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,

State of mind?  WtF?  I can't remember 2011 either and I am bit younger than HRC.

Wanna bet she says she can't remember 50 times?

What a waste of $$

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
2.1  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Split Personality @2    2 months ago

you think hillary can't remember why she used her own server?

OK then... LOL

 

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @2    2 months ago

Yes, her state of mind that told her it would be a good idea to do something no one else ever has--install a private server in her home to conduct official business on.

gee, some might even think she might have done it to avoid FOIA requests.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.2  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.1    2 months ago

Why confuse a private email address with a private server?

they are different, and that difference is important.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.3  XDm9mm  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.2    2 months ago
Why confuse a private email address with a private server? they are different, and that difference is important.

Shhhh........    that's a secret that they don't want you to recognize or understand.  Many on the left have a grossly misplaced superiority complex.

Nor do they want you to know that emails that were sent/received on a private server are under your complete control to destroy as necessary if questioned where those using a public domain email service are retrievable from the email address domain provider, for example @gmail.com, @yahoo.com, @hotmail.com, etc., etc.

 

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.4  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.2    2 months ago

Ignoring the Romney story?

Why would the location of the server matter?

Every email came from somewhere or went somewhere leaving at least two copies of that email on the internet and at least two servers, probably more at State.

If she had physically destroyed the hard drive like Gov Romney did, then she should have been charged.

Otherwise she's just a washed up two time losing Presidential candidate who most people are sick and tired of hearing from and about.

All this FOIA dust up does is put her back in the news.  the last place she deserves.

Total waste of time.

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.5  Split Personality  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.3    2 months ago
Nor do they want you to know that emails that were sent/received on a private server are under your complete control to destroy as necessary

Totally wrong.  The info is somewhere on the other servers which were the senders or the receivers.

it's just inconvenient to look for it that way.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
2.2.6  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.4    2 months ago

Trump WANTS her in the headlines to be red meet for his illiterates, and to distract from his total F up of this pandemic handling. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.7  XDm9mm  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.5    2 months ago
Totally wrong.  The info is somewhere on the other servers which were the senders or the receivers. it's just inconvenient to look for it that way.

Totally not wrong.    One would need to know who the other senders were to be able to investigate it.  As to who the 'receivers' were, hell that's ezpz as long as that information wasn't bleach bit erased from the offending (read private Clinton) server.

Of course, investigators could request every email from every email account provider on a global basis and try to sort through that.   Hell, maybe get the personal emails between the Russians and Clinton and the DNC.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.8  XDm9mm  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.2.6    2 months ago
Trump WANTS her in the headlines to be red meet for his illiterates, and to distract from his total F up of this pandemic handling. 

Ok..   here's your assignment for the day.   As you obviously like to play Arm Chair General and denigrate what someone has done in the PAST, now's YOUR time to shine and tell the world exactly what needs to be done going forward from today.  Be specific.  Oh and saying you would NOT have done this or that in the past is NOT going forward.

Actually, that challenge goes for ALL the Trump haters out there.  SPECIFICALLY what would you do GOING FORWARD.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2.9  Sparty On  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.8    2 months ago

You're gonna just get a lot of 20-20 hindsight nonsense and you know it.    And probably from people here who accused him of being racist when he stopped travel to and from China BEFORE China was completely honest about the aggressively viral nature of this virus.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.10  XDm9mm  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.9    2 months ago
BEFORE China was completely honest

May I ask exactly when that happened?  China and honest do not belong in the same sentence together unless specifically indicating they were not and never have been honest about anything.

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.11  Split Personality  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.9    2 months ago
BEFORE China was completely honest about the aggressively viral nature of this virus.

Have they been honest yet?

That seems to be an inconsistency in the implied conspiracy theories.

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2.12  Sparty On  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.10    2 months ago

Lol .... okay .... how about "more" honest?

 
 
 
Sparty On
2.2.13  Sparty On  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.11    2 months ago

Do you think they were "forthcoming" and "honest" in how they reported on this outbreak?

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.14  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.4    2 months ago

Why do you feel compelled to deflect  from Hillary?

This ain't got SHIT to do with Romney, Bush, Trump, or anyone else besides Hillay R. Clinton and her little group of toadies.

This is about a S of S who, unlike ANY of her predecessors, had a private server installed at her house, later had 30k+ emails deleted, and then had the server Bleached-Bit.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.15  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.2.6    2 months ago
Trump WANTS her in the headlines to be red meet for his illiterates, and to distract from his total F up of this pandemic handling. 

W-a-h, w-a-h, w-a-h.

Somebody is being mean to your Abuela.

WWWWAAAAHHHHHHH!

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.16  XDm9mm  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.14    2 months ago
later had 30k+ emails deleted

ALL of which were under Congressional subpoena.   But she had to delete the recipes and wedding lists!!  jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.17  XDm9mm  replied to  Sparty On @2.2.9    2 months ago
You're gonna just get a lot of 20-20 hindsight nonsense and you know it.

Actually, I got exactly what I anticipated.  CRICKETS.  Not a word.  Nothing.  Nadda.  ZIP.  ZILCH.

So, the plethora of TDS sufferers who pose as hindsight 20/20 Arm Chair Generals don't have a clue or theory among that they can share.   TYPICAL.

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.18  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.14    2 months ago
Clinton was the filter for what was relevant to work and what was not. Of course, before electronic communication, federal records were routinely filtered by individuals, who sorted their papers before handing over boxes to archivists. And, many federal workers, Capitol Hill staff, etc., use personal email accounts — in addition to their official accounts — and choose what, if anything, is turned over from those. ...
The Justice Department weighed in , calling it "sheer speculation" that "Clinton withheld any work-related emails from those provided to the Department of State." What's more, Justice wrote, "FOIA creates no obligation for an agency to search for and produce records that it does not possess and control."

In fact, the department refers to a past fight over former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's notes, as Josh Gerstein points out . Notes and tapes of Kissinger's conversations were sent to the Library of Congress — rather than leaving them to the State Department — restricting their public access. FOIA requests were denied by the State Department because they were under the aegis of the Library of Congress. Kissinger declined to turn the documents over to archivists' requests.

What's more, the Supreme Court held that the Kissinger documents did not have to be turned over under FOIA — even though they were notes taken while Kissinger was at State — because State did not have possession of them.

...

The bottom line is this: No one will likely ever know what was deleted from Clinton's server. Barring one of the 30,000 emails Clinton turned over to the State Department being deemed "classified," it's also unlikely she will ever be found to have violated the letter of the law.
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/04/02/396823014/fact-check-hillary-clinton-those-emails-and-the-law

Just another tempest in a teapot by those so invested in partisan politics that they think some sort of punishment is due and will change something.

Ciao! jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.19  Split Personality  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.16    2 months ago
ALL of which were under Congressional subpoena

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

Yeah we have seen how many Congressional subpoenas are honored....

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.20  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.14    2 months ago
This is about a S of S who, unlike ANY of her predecessors, had a private server installed at her house,

The same SoS the FBI refused to prosecute?

yeah, I seem to remember that jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.21  XDm9mm  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.19    2 months ago
Yeah we have seen how many Congressional subpoenas are honored....

Keep laughing.....    it will come back to haunt you.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.2.22  XDm9mm  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.20    2 months ago
The same SoS the FBI refused to prosecute?

Yeah, that skank.  Of course, that was also predicted on another top dog FBI guy that got his ass fired if you remember that little tidbit of information.  And the number of other FBI pukes that got their asses fired.

Don't fear SP, the train be comin round the mountain real soon.

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.23  Split Personality  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.21    2 months ago
it will come back to haunt you.

Zero skin in the game, nothing to haunt me at all. No axe to grind or scores to settle.

jrSmiley_7_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.24  Split Personality  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.22    2 months ago
Don't fear SP, the train be comin round the mountain real soon.

Been hearing dat shit for 5 or 6 decades.

Waiting for revenge is wasteful.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.25  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.20    2 months ago

Rather naïve to assume that nothing could be wrong just because a Justice Dept. in the tank for Hillary refused to prosecute her.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
2.2.26  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  igknorantzrulz @2.2.6    2 months ago
Trump WANTS her in the headlines

so trump started this case?    yrs ago?      

trump also scheduled the resulting judges decisions and the timetable for hillary's appeals to reach this point today?

all that so hillary would be in the headlines today?

trump must be a genius to plan that far out... LOL

when durham releases the hounds in the fall?     you can believe that is scheduled...   because it is.

this hillary thing?  just a happy coincidence.

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.27  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.25    2 months ago

I always appreciate your kind Christian thoughts of empathy and forgiveness.

jrSmiley_93_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.28  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.25    2 months ago

Naive? Doesn't God work through prayer?

Obviously the Justice Department is in the tank for no one, let alone "a Clinton"

and prayer prevailed, don't you agree?

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.29  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.27    2 months ago

As I appreciate your deflections away from your beloved Abuela.

 
 
 
Split Personality
2.2.30  Split Personality  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.29    2 months ago

I buried mine about 20 years ago. She was 98 and still independent up to the last minute.

Thanks for reminding me. She was a hoot.

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.31  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @2.2.30    2 months ago

I'm sure Hillary would absolutely love it if you thought of her as your Abuela.

She wanted everyone to think that just a few short years ago.

 
 
 
Ender
3  Ender    2 months ago

I say she just defy any subpoena. Worked for donald and his cohorts.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.1  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3    2 months ago
I say she just defy any subpoena.

me too.... having that judge order her arrest would be hilarious...  good times for everyone.

I knew we would eventually agree on something.. LOL

but, when exactly did a judge order trump to testify?     (  I must have missed that bit )

 
 
 
Ender
3.1.1  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.1    2 months ago

Why does judicial watch get to ask her anything?

If you think this is the end of this...

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.1.2  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.1.1    2 months ago
Why does judicial watch get to ask her anything?

simple, "because the judge said so"

If you think this is the end of this..

don't be afraid to finish a sentence.

besides... this is just the start.  nothing can stop what is coming in the fall either.

 
 
 
Ender
3.1.3  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.1.2    2 months ago

Again, probably not the end of it.

You are acting like this cannot be appealed, when it states in the article the Hillary camp already plans to do so. They have asked for it to go to a higher court.

If so, I believe they will fail. A freedom of information act does not include what people may have been thinking at the time along with sworn depositions.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.1.4  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.1.3    2 months ago
You are acting like this cannot be appealed,

she is trying that now. she is going to lose.

the state dept just threw her under a bus.

that is what the article is about.

 
 
 
Ender
3.1.5  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.1.4    2 months ago

So you think that getting documents through the freedom of information act should include what people may have been thinking at the time and sworn depositions along with testimony for people that no longer hold a government office, and no longer have access to those records.

Good to know. If it goes through and succeeds, plan on plenty of people in the donald administration to have to go through the same.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.1.6  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.1.5    2 months ago
and no longer have access to those records.

she needs "records" to explain why she used a private server? and why she lied to the american people about benghazi?

 really?

 
 
 
Ender
3.1.7  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.1.6    2 months ago

Again, do you understand what you are championing?

If allowed to go through by this judge, it is basically letting a politically bias private institution have their own investigation.

I know you are only looking at this as at get Clinton at all costs thing but think about what it would really do and the doors it could open up.

 
 
 
Ender
3.1.8  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.1.6    2 months ago

Where did you get that from what I said. The government has the records, not Hillary.

This is a fishing expedition by a bias private entity.

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.9  Split Personality  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.1.4    2 months ago
the state dept just threw her under a bus.

Gee, I wonder why?

Are you stating that this State Department is impartial and unbiased?

Please...jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.1.10  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.9    2 months ago
Are you stating that this State Department is impartial and unbiased?

I would state that this state dept is at least as unbiased as pelosi, schiff, and crew when they investigate trump.

does that thought worry you?    it should.

besides, why should the left get all the fun with endless investigations?  the right gets to play also ya know.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.1.11  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.1.7    2 months ago
  and the doors it could open up.

doors called transparency and accountability?  let's do it 

maybe this is what it takes to get politicians scared straight.

let chaos reign :)

 
 
 
Citizen Kane-473667
3.1.12  Citizen Kane-473667  replied to  Ender @3.1.1    2 months ago
Why does judicial watch get to ask her anything?

Because they have a legal Right to do so under the FOIA requests they filed. Are you arguing that Government actions should be shielded from Public scrutiny even when it doesn't involve actual National Security? How much Accountability is too much for you?

It is quite obvious that her supporters and the Democratic Party have no intention of holding her accountable for anything, so Yeah, we need someone else to do it for them...

 
 
 
Split Personality
3.1.13  Split Personality  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.1.10    2 months ago
does that thought worry you?    it should.

Why on earth would it worry me?

 
 
 
Ender
3.1.14  Ender  replied to  Citizen Kane-473667 @3.1.12    2 months ago

Bullshit. Why is every conservative here ignoring what I said. Seems to go right over their heads.

It is like some cannot see straight through their partisan lens. 

For you, 

The following are not included within the definition of “agency record”:

Anything that is not a tangible or documentary record, such as an individual’s memory or oral communication.

https://www.fca.gov/template-fca/download/foia_handbook.pdf
 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2  Texan1211  replied to  Ender @3    2 months ago
I say she just defy any subpoena. Worked for donald and his cohorts.

LOL! She will testify as ordered.

 
 
 
Ender
3.2.1  Ender  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2    2 months ago

No, they are going to appeal and are asking a higher court to look at it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.2  Texan1211  replied to  Ender @3.2.1    2 months ago

I bet she has to be deposed.

Want to make it interesting?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.3  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.2.1    2 months ago
No, they are going to appeal and are asking a higher court to look at it.

this is THAT appeal.   and the state dept threw her under the bus.

if needed, the supreme court will crush her as well.

time is not a problem.  patience is a virtue :)

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.2.3    2 months ago

Kind of makes one wonder what she is so scared of, huh?

Why not testify if she has nothing to hide?

Isn't that what they say about Trump's taxes?

LMMFAO!

 
 
 
Ender
3.2.5  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.2.3    2 months ago
Along with arguing that the court ruling was outrageous, Hillary Clinton’s legal team asked a higher court to reverse the ruling from the lower court.

From the article. It is not over yet.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.6  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.2.5    2 months ago
From the article. It is not over yet.

I agree, just getting started.

even if it has to go to the supreme court she will eventually lose this one and be forced to testify.

nothing will stop it forever, time is not a problem

 
 
 
Ender
3.2.7  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.2.6    2 months ago

You actually think the SC would let a private institution have their own investigation?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.8  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.2.7    2 months ago
You actually think the SC would let a private institution have their own investigation

LOL nice spin job,

the law is not on clintons side here.   

do you think the supreme court will rule clinton is above the law? 

that would be one hell of a precedent to set.

 
 
 
Ender
3.2.9  Ender  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @3.2.8    2 months ago

How is she being above the law? The investigation into her was closed. Several actually. Now a private entity wants more testimony. Do you actually think that after the government closes an investigation any private entity can come along and reopen it and demand more testimony?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.10  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.2.9    2 months ago
The investigation into her was closed.

one closed investigation does not close all other investigations... LOL

 

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.11  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Ender @3.2.9    2 months ago
any private entity can come along and reopen it and demand more testimony?

look on the bright side. in 5yrs after trump leaves office the left can try to do the same.

assuming trump can stall a case as long as hillary has?    we can discuss that in about 8-10 yrs.

LOL

 

 

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.12  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.4    2 months ago
Kind of makes one wonder what she is so scared of, huh?

her worst nightmare.is being under oath while testifying.    

she might even shit herself again... LOL

 
 
 
Sparty On
3.3  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @3    2 months ago

Or she could just the do the Obama Admin shuffle .... just plead the 5th.

No muss, no fuss, no accountability.   Right up Hills alley.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
4  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball    2 months ago

chief of staff cheryl mills is trying the same stall tactic in the same case.  she will fail also

does anyone think cheryl and hillary's stories will match?  

 
 
 
Split Personality
4.1  Split Personality  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @4    2 months ago

What? The Clinton Cabal hasn't killed her yet?

Say it ain't so!

/s

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @4.1    2 months ago

Naw--they probably need her to take a fall or to "corroborate" something Hillary says under oath.

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1.3  MUVA  replied to  Split Personality @4.1    2 months ago

When you are the head of the cabal you are safe everyone else not so much.

 
 
 
Sparty On
4.1.4  Sparty On  replied to  MUVA @4.1.3    2 months ago

Damn, i need a cabal.  

Anyone have a how too book on it?

 
 
 
Split Personality
4.1.5  Split Personality  replied to  Sparty On @4.1.4    2 months ago
 
 
 
Sparty On
4.1.6  Sparty On  replied to  Split Personality @4.1.5    2 months ago

Lol, thx ... i'd get right on that but i already spend way too much mind numbing time on the net ..... i mean look at this place .... jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Split Personality
4.1.7  Split Personality  replied to  Sparty On @4.1.6    2 months ago

Now, now...

No one is holding you hostage, you know. jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sparty On
4.1.8  Sparty On  replied to  Split Personality @4.1.7    2 months ago

Very true, i wouldn't make for a very good hostage ....

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
5  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball    2 months ago

The Court has considered the numerous times in which Secretary Clinton said she could not recall or remember certain details in her prior interrogatory answers. In a deposition, it is more likely that plaintiff’s counsel could use documents and other testimony to attempt to refresh her recollection. And so, to avoid the unsatisfying and inefficient outcome of multiple rounds of fruitless interrogatories and move this almost six-year-old case closer to its conclusion, Judicial Watch will be permitted to clarify and further explore Secretary Clinton’s answers in person and immediately after she gives them. The Court agrees with Judicial Watch – it is time to hear directly from Secretary Clinton.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-doj-tells-appeals-court-it-should-reject-clinton-effort-to-avoid-testimony/


under oath facing hostile lawyers who ain't gonna fall for her bs?  hillary will go stark raving mad... LOL    I hope they record her deposition.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
6  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball    2 months ago

The court also ordered the deposition of Mills and two other State Department officials. Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-state-doj-tells-appeals-court-it-should-reject-clinton-effort-to-avoid-testimony/

 
 
 
lib50
6.1  lib50  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @6    2 months ago

What if she just says no and ignores everything just like Trump?  What if EVERYBODY Trump tries to go after says fuck off?  New Trump standards are for everyone, not just Trump and the gop. 

 
 
 
loki12
6.1.1  loki12  replied to  lib50 @6.1    2 months ago

Then she goes to jail, because most intelligent people know that a judge has the ability to enforce a subponea, where the house has to beg the DoJ to enforce theirs.  They are toothless tigers who have an inflated sense of their importance.

 
 
 
Texan1211
6.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  lib50 @6.1    2 months ago
What if she just says no and ignores everything just like Trump?  What if EVERYBODY Trump tries to go after says fuck off?  New Trump standards are for everyone, not just Trump and the gop.  

Ooh, SPECTACULAR DEFLECTION!!!!!

Trump ain't got shit to do with this.

Hillary OWNS this shit--she created the mess, now she can deal with the repercussions of HER actions.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
6.1.3  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  lib50 @6.1    2 months ago
What if she just says no and ignores everything just like Trump?

the judge will throw her ass in jail.... so yepp. lets hope for that  :)

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.1.4  XDm9mm  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @6.1.3    2 months ago
the judge will throw her ass in jail.... so yepp. lets hope for that 

Why?  There's not enough disinfectant to clean it when the shithead gets out.   

I'd prefer sending her on a mission to Benghazi and let the locals know exactly who she is before arrival.   

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
6.1.5  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  XDm9mm @6.1.4    2 months ago
I'd prefer sending her on a mission to Benghazi

id put her in gitmo and then forget where cuba was... LOL

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.1.6  XDm9mm  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @6.1.5    2 months ago
id put her in gitmo and then forget where cuba was... LOL

GITMO is a pretty nice place.   

Of course, it's populated by Marines so that does detract some! //S//

Seriously, let the people that had their family killed by the people in the annex know who she was and her live would become very complicated very quick and even her dollars wouldn't buy her ass out.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
6.1.7  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  XDm9mm @6.1.4    2 months ago
I'd prefer sending her on a mission to Benghazi and let the locals know exactly who she is before arrival.

the more I think about that, the more I can get behind that plan.

cheers :)

 
 
 
loki12
7  loki12    2 months ago

Bye Bernie, The democrats are now left with a senile old fool who can't fill a phone booth for his appearances.   Yeah?

 
 
 
TTGA
7.1  TTGA  replied to  loki12 @7    2 months ago
Bye Bernie, The democrats are now left with a senile old fool who can't fill a phone booth for his appearances.   Yeah?

He probably can't , but right now nobody can fill a phone booth with people for any reason.  You do realize, don't you, that you've just dated pretty much everybody here.  The youngsters out there have never even seen a phone booth outside of a museum.  They couldn't recognize your allusion, but the folks here can.

 
 
 
loki12
7.1.1  loki12  replied to  TTGA @7.1    2 months ago

That isn’t exactly correct 😜, Dr Who is quite popular with the younger crowd. The Tardis is a phone booth. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
8  Perrie Halpern R.A.    2 months ago

This article need to move to the front page main board as blogs are for original material. 

 
 
 
Steve Ott
9  Steve Ott    2 months ago

It wasn't the State Dept. that denied anyone anything. It was the freakin' court.The State Dept declined to go along with her petition, but that does not mean that the court may not have decided to rule in her favor. The justice dept often gets its face slapped by judges. The title is exceptionally misleading and shows ignorance, or malicious intent.

 
 
 
bbl-1
10  bbl-1    2 months ago

The Judicial Watch people are snipping at Clinton's heels again.

Could it be that there have some recent rumblings from Deutsche Bank papers and certain sycophants' are scrambling to get on board with a tried and true distraction? 

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.1  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  bbl-1 @10    2 months ago
are snipping at Clinton's heels again.

again?  this case is like 6yrs old... LOL

she cant keep stalling forever.

ain't it a shame when people persist even though the left determines it is over?   LOL

 
 
 
Tessylo
10.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @10.1    2 months ago

Still beating that dead horse I see 

That's whack

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.1.2  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Tessylo @10.1.1    2 months ago
That's whack

in chess, the long game always beats the short game.

this case is about 6 yrs old... how many times have you declared it over and hillary in the clear?

you can say it is over today - but it ain't over just because you say. it is.

we can discuss this all again after durham is finished.    (  yes that is still going on also. )

 

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.1.3  bbl-1  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @10.1    2 months ago

Stalling for what?  What is it?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.1.4  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  bbl-1 @10.1.3    2 months ago
Stalling for what

time.

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.1.5  bbl-1  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @10.1.4    2 months ago

No.  What is it that Clinton is hiding?  Russian connections?  Money laundering?  Tax frauds or evasions?  Insurance frauds?

I ask again.  What is it that the right wing seeks?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.1.6  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  bbl-1 @10.1.5    2 months ago
What is it that Clinton is hiding? 

 she lied 

why would she be in a hurry to prove that?

she used a private server to bypass the FOIA and hide her bs but... it is not working.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.1.7  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  bbl-1 @10.1.5    2 months ago
What is it that the right wing seeks?

nothing less than a good old fashioned  "perp walk"    and she is not the only one on that list.

relax, chill out, sit back and watch the show. it is just getting interesting.

wait until durham finishes his criminal investigations.    that is gonna be awesome.

this is just a sideshow

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.1.8  bbl-1  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @10.1.6    2 months ago

What are the alleged lies in her server?

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.2  Texan1211  replied to  bbl-1 @10    2 months ago

Here is my fearless prediction:

Every single time someone posts an article unfavorable to Democrats, and Hillary Clinton in particular, someone will deflect and accuse people of trying to "deflect from Trump".

It is a pretty safe prediction--based on articles and comments made here.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.2.1  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Texan1211 @10.2    2 months ago
It is a pretty safe prediction--based on articles and comments made here.

yepp. what cracks me up is the left somehow thinks it is all over. then get shocked when they find it is not.

when the truth is along with benghazi and hillarys server, everything 2016 is still being investigated.

maybe they have long term memory problems?  

they will say the same things when durham is done with his criminal investigations.  count on it.

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.2.2  bbl-1  replied to  Texan1211 @10.2    2 months ago

No.  What are the lies that are allegedly in her server?

No deflection.  Just asked a question.  What are the lies?

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.2.3  bbl-1  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @10.2.1    2 months ago

Durham will be done with his investigations in the early part of November, 2020.  Whereupon he will go home, prepare his statements and papers as he readies himself to testify under oath.

 
 
 
Tessylo
10.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @10.2.1    2 months ago

What is there still to be investigated FFS?

Beating a dead horse still 

 
 
 
Ender
10.2.5  Ender  replied to  bbl-1 @10.2.3    2 months ago

I read some excerpts from an interview with Barr that he did on, of course, fox.

Said he didn't like what he saw and if anyone was found to have broken the law they would be prosecuted. Sounded like they really didn't have anything so have to keep on digging.

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.2.6  bbl-1  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.4    2 months ago

Wonder what would happen if the new Attorney General in January 2020 would be Hillary Clinton?  That would be a 'hoot', wouldn't it?  I'd love it.  Remember her coining the term, "A vast right wing conspiracy?"

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
10.2.7  igknorantzrulz  replied to  bbl-1 @10.2.6    2 months ago

lock him up !

lock him up!

lock him up!

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.2.8  bbl-1  replied to  igknorantzrulz @10.2.7    2 months ago

Yes sir!

 
 
 
bbl-1
10.2.9  bbl-1  replied to  Ender @10.2.5    2 months ago

Barr isn't looking for lawbreakers.  He is looking for time to shield himself, the administration, several Russians, Saudis, fellow republicans, donors, Bankers, Hedge Fund folk, Chinese investors, the Trump family and their three friends, others yet unnamed, certain people in the NRA, several GOP Super Pac's and most importantly of all, 'What really happened in Helsinki'.

Except, I suspect 'they are running out of time'.  And they know it.

This too.  What is Durham being paid?   From which department are the funds being procured?  Of his investigations have their been documents already compiled?  Where are the documents being kept?  When will the documents be made public?  If they are not to be made public, then what are the reasons?

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.2.10  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.4    2 months ago
What is there still to be investigated

maybe read the linked article and find out.

just a thought.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.2.11  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.4    2 months ago
What is there still to be investigated

if your talking about durhams investigation?


everything prior to and including 2016  russia russia russia bs

what did everyone know and when did they know it.

most importantly, who told who to do what. and how far up does it go.

fabricating evidence and lying to courts in an attempt to remove a president?   people have to go to jail.

if you thought that was over also?    I have more bad news...

the gears of govt move slow..  however, once they start turning they never stop. patience is key.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.2.12  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  bbl-1 @10.2.3    one month ago
Durham will be done with his investigations in the early part of November, 2020.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/john-durham-expands-investigative-team-amid-coronavirus-outbreak

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.2.13  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  bbl-1 @10.2.9    one month ago
Barr isn't looking for lawbreakers.

barr is not part of this case... LOL

but nice attempt at the spin cycle...

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.2.14  seeder  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Tessylo @10.2.4    3 weeks ago
What is there still to be investigated FFS?

breaking news...   

  Latest DOJ Documents Released In Flynn Case Reveal Obama White House Was Running the Operation

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/04/huge-revelation-latest-doj-documents-released-flynn-case-reveal-obama-white-house-running-operation/

Beating a dead horse still 

yepp, those horse's names are obama, clinton and their lackeys.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


Eat The Press Do Not Read It
JohnRussell
Ronin2
FLYNAVY1
GregTx
Gordy327


28 visitors