AP Exclusive: Justice Dept dropping Flynn's criminal case

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  texan1211  •  2 months ago  •  39 comments

By:   MICHAEL BALSAMO and E (MSN)

AP Exclusive: Justice Dept dropping Flynn's criminal case
The Justice Department on Thursday said it is dropping the criminal case against President Donald Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, abandoning a prosecution that became a rallying cry for the president and his supporters in attacking the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department on Thursday said it is dropping the criminal case against President Donald Trump's first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, abandoning a prosecution that became a rallying cry for the president and his supporters in attacking the FBI's Trump-Russia investigation.

The move is a stunning reversal for one of the signature cases brought by special counsel Robert Mueller. It comes even though prosecutors for the past three years have maintained that Flynn lied to the FBI in a January 2017 interview about his conversations with the Russian ambassador.

Flynn himself admitted as much, pleading guilty before asking to withdraw the plea, and became a key cooperator for Mueller the special counsel investigated ties between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign.

In court documents being filed Thursday, the Justice Department said it is dropping the case "after a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information." The documents were obtained by The Associated Press.

The Justice Department said it had concluded that Flynn's interview by the FBI was "untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI's counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn" and that the interview was "conducted without any legitimate investigative basis."

The U.S. attorney reviewing the Flynn case, Jeff Jensen, recommended dropping the case to Attorney General William Barr last week and formalized the recommendation in a document this week.

"Through the course of my review of General Flynn's case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case," Jensen said in a statement. "I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed."

The decision is certain to be embraced by Trump, who has relentlessly tweeted about the case and last week pronounced Flynn "exonerated," and to energize supporters who have taken up the retired Army lieutenant general as a cause. But it will also add to Democratic complaints that Attorney General William Barr is excessively loyal to the president, and could be a distraction for a Justice Department that for months has sought to focus on crimes arising from the coronavirus.

 The Department's action comes amid an internal review into the handling he case and an aggressive effort by Flynn's lawyers to challenge the basis for the prosecution. The lawyers cited newly disclosed FBI emails and notes last week to allege that Flynn was improperly trapped into lying when agents interviewed him at the White House days after Trump's inauguration. Though none of the documents appeared to undercut the central allegation that Flynn had lied to the FBI, Trump last week pronounced him "exonerated

The decision is the latest dramatic development in a years-old case full of twists and turns. In recent months, Flynn's attorneys have leveled a series of allegations about the FBI's actions and asked to withdraw his guilty plea. A judge has rejected most of the claims and not ruled on others, including the bid to revoke the plea.

The decision comes as Barr has increasingly challenged the Russia investigation, saying in a television interview last month that it was started "without any basis." In February, he overruled a decision by prosecutors in the case of Roger Stone, another former Trump adviser, in favor of a more lenient sentence for the longtime Trump friend.

Earlier this year, Barr appointed U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen of St. Louis to investigate the handling of Flynn's case. As part of that process, the Justice Department gave Flynn's attorneys a series of emails and notes, including one handwritten note from a senior FBI official that mapped out internal deliberations about the purpose of the Flynn interview: "What's our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?" the official wrote.

Other documents show that the FBI had been prepared weeks before its interview of Flynn to drop its investigation into whether he was acting at the direction of Russia. Later that month, though, as the White House insisted that Flynn had never discussed sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, FBI officials grew more concerned by Flynn's conversations with the diplomat and what he had communicated to the White House. The investigation remained open, and agents went to visit him in the White House on Jan. 24, 2017.

Justice Department officials visited the White House two days later to warn officials that they feared that Flynn was compromised and vulnerable to blackmail by Russia because of his account of what was said on the call. White House officials waited several weeks to oust him from the job, saying they'd concluded that Flynn had lied to them.

Flynn pleaded guilty that December, among the first of the president's aides to admit guilt in Mueller's investigation. He acknowledged that he lied about his conversations with Kislyak, in which he encouraged Russia not to retaliate against the U.S. for sanctions imposed by the Obama administration over election interference.

He provided such extensive cooperation that prosecutors said he was entitled to a sentence of probation instead of prison.

As it turned out, that sentencing hearing was abruptly cut short after Flynn, facing a stern rebuke from U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, asked to be able to continue cooperating and earn credit toward a more lenient sentence.

Flynn's misgivings about the case were already on display when his then-attorneys pointedly noted in their sentencing memo that the FBI had not warned him that it was against the law to lie when they interviewed him at the White House in January 2017.

Since then, he has hired new attorneys — including Sidney Powell, a conservative commentator and outspoken critic of Mueller's investigation — who have taken a far more confrontational stance to the government. The lawyers have accused prosecutors of withholding documents and evidence they said was favorable to the case and have repeatedly noted that one of the two agents who interviewed Flynn was fired from the FBI for having sent derogatory text messages about Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Read More


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
Texan1211
1  seeder  Texan1211    2 months ago

Certainly looks like the whole thing was nothing more than a set-up now, doesn't it?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2  XDm9mm    2 months ago

As i said elsewhere regarding this.

The kitty is unraveling the ball of yarn and the dominoes are starting to fall.

This is just the beginning of what is to come in my opinion.

I'm hoping for and looking forward to some perp walks.  Hell, maybe we can even get an "exclusive" for FOX news as a swat team goes to someones home for that arrest!!  US Marshall's arrest FBI Agents!!

 
 
 
badfish
3  badfish    2 months ago

3 2 1, all involved are looking out their windows for an FBI swat team. They are coming!

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1  XDm9mm  replied to  badfish @3    2 months ago
They are coming!

I'll submit it will likely be US Marshall's.   Too many good FBI agents might want to exert personal animus for what they've done to the reputation of the FBI.

But they will have to be heavily armed in full gear as the people they'll be going after ARE KNOWN TO BE ARMED.

 
 
 
badfish
3.1.1  badfish  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1    2 months ago

Let's hope the news is tipped off so we can watch it live when they kick in John Brennan's door with loaded weapons. pointed at him.

 
 
 
Tacos!
3.1.2  Tacos!  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1    2 months ago

Can we start a pool on how many big black SUVs they’ll be using? Maybe some over/under wagering?

 
 
 
badfish
4  badfish    2 months ago

I thought for a moment I was in an echo chamber but then I realized they are hiding from the truth. They are reading but don't want to have to eat a turd sandwich.

A moment of silence for the thousands of bogus Russia articles, the flow charts and all the Putin comments. Meanwhile It was Hillary licking Putin's taint and swallowing disinformation.

 
 
 
TTGA
4.1  TTGA  replied to  badfish @4    2 months ago
they are hiding from the truth. They are reading but don't want to have to eat a turd sandwich.

Not in an echo chamber.  Finally some stuff happening.  XDm is right.  They would likely use Marshall's rather than FBI.  There are lots of good FBI agents out there who feel as I do.  As an ex cop, I totally despise dirty cops.  They make it worse for everybody else who  are trying to do an honest job.  Of course, secrecy must be maintained because there are a few in that organization who would give a tip off to the perps.

 
 
 
JBB
5  JBB    2 months ago

If you needed more proof of corruption within the Trump Justice Department...look no further. Flynn plead guilty FFS! History will note this as a new low...

 
 
 
badfish
5.1  badfish  replied to  JBB @5    2 months ago

Oh no is that what your going with? 

That isn't going to work out very well for you when Durham starts kicking in doors of your favorite Obama administration bureaucrats. 

Good luck with that, the Russia collusion hoax is an ugly stain on American history and the truth has come out. Democrats colluded with Russia to take out the Donald and they got caught.

Furrther more, you have posted thousands of comments on this site that have been completely debunked. They weren't true then and they aren't now.

You should apologize to the community.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
5.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @5    2 months ago
If you needed more proof of corruption within the Trump Justice Department

Yeah, try again.  It wasn't "Trump Justice Department" it was Obama's that kicked all this off. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.3  XDm9mm  replied to  JBB @5    2 months ago
If you needed more proof of corruption within the Trump Justice Department...look no further. Flynn plead guilty FFS! History will note this as a new low...

Have you ever heard of the word COERCION?   When you have the full weight and power of the United States Government destroying you and promising to do the same to your loved ones, you yourself would confess to nailing Christ to the Cross to save them.

It's a well known and to be honest a very useful, albeit a lowlife scumbag thug, tactic to use when you know you'll lose in court.   

 
 
 
badfish
5.3.1  badfish  replied to  XDm9mm @5.3    2 months ago

We know for fact they threatened to go after his son. They are awful people.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
5.3.2  XDm9mm  replied to  badfish @5.3.1    2 months ago
We know for fact they threatened to go after his son. They are awful people

I'm sincerely hoping that some of these people are prosecuted and imprisoned, preferably in general population with people they themselves put behind bars.   

Some if imprisoned will of course need to be in super-max simply due to what they know and we have to make damn sure that is kept secret.  Obviously, some have no problem colluding and working with adversaries of this country.

I'm also hoping they don't stop running up the flag pole for political expediency. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
6  Dismayed Patriot    2 months ago

So he didn't lie? Oh, wait, no, he did lie and admitted to lying.

But, but some official in the justice department said "What's our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?"!!

So? That in no way exonerates him from the lie. How do you "get" someone to lie anyway? If I asked any of you conservatives reading this, do you think I or anyone else could "get you to lie"? Is there someway I could trick you into lying? Did the investigators use hypnosis? All that they did is what any good detective does when investigating a crime, they try and get their suspect to trip up in their story proving they have something to hide and that their actions were not above board and completely innocent. If what Flynn did was totally above board and completely innocent how and why would he feel the need to lie? How could he be backed into a corner where he felt lying to investigators was the only option?

Trump is a low IQ criminal, much like Al Capone, as are all his lackeys, Barr, Flynn, all of them, disgusting half witted bigoted thugs trying to run the government like their own personal mafia. Trump is nothing but a less intelligent Putin who is trying to copy their oligarch mobster government. This action by the justice department further proves their complicit corruption, it's just too bad there is no God to burn their putrid souls for eternity for they certainly have earned such an end. The fact that so many have had the wool pulled over their eyes and continue to support this criminal enterprise is what's truly shocking.

 
 
 
badfish
6.1  badfish  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6    2 months ago

Documents show he never lied, the FBI agreed he never lied. They lied and they got caught.

Why not just admit for the last three years you were completely wrong and it can end here. Then we can go on and take your comments seriously.

800

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
6.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  badfish @6.1    2 months ago
Documents show he never lied

Bullshit.

the FBI agreed he never lied

Bullshit.

They lied and they got caught.

Some admitted to not having proper cause and said the interview was "conducted without any legitimate investigative basis".

Flynn still lied and admitted to lying.

If Flynn didn't lie, why would he admit to lying?

The facts remain, Russia did aid Trump in the 2016 election, Putin did admit he intentionally helped Trump win and did illegally hack and publicly release an American political parties emails to embarrass and sabotage their chances in a national election, there were dozens of contacts between Russians and the Trump campaign, Manafort did share polling data with a pro-Russian oligarch, Flynn did lie about his conversation with the Russian ambassador, Trump did on at least 10 occasions attempt to obstruct the investigation as found by the Mueller report, the only thing it didn't find was a smoking gun proving Trump was directly involved in a criminal conspiracy where he offered to get rid of sanctions for help in the election. The fact does of course remain that he did later try to get sanctions against Russia lifted after the election, so he tried to pay back Putin, we just don't have any evidence of the conspiracy, it was apparently just unspoken good will exchanged between the two of them. How the blind, deaf and dumb continue to call all the facts we know about what happened "a hoax" is still rather stunning and shows how truly brain-dead they must be.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
6.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.1    2 months ago
Bullshit.

GET USED TO IT!

THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING!

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
6.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.1.2    2 months ago
THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING!

Nah, the bullshit coming from the right has been ongoing for decades, this is no where near the beginning. The majority no longer trusts the right wing and have continued to reject them at the ballot box, the only hope the right has is to disenfranchise as many patriotic Americans as they can, it's their only hope of winning any future elections which is why they are so adamant about denying mail in ballots and push intentionally discriminatory voter ID laws. They know they can't win in a free and fair election, just like their hero Putin and his tiny-handed puppet Trump, but their cheating will not help them survive the upcoming tsunami this November. Have fun eating all those sour grapes you've been hoarding.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
6.1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.3    2 months ago

You seem upset. Console yourself with the fact that none of these rouge agents and dirty lawyers seem to be going o jail. They got caught, yet they got to walk away. I'll leave the rant as the epitaph of the progressive movement.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.1.5  XDm9mm  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.1    2 months ago
Documents show he never lied
Bullshit.

Does that manure smell sweet?  The FBI documents prove it must.

the FBI agreed he never lied
Bullshit.

See above.

They lied and they got caught.
Some admitted to not having proper cause and said the interview was "conducted without any legitimate investigative basis".

Flynn still lied and admitted to lying.

If Flynn didn't lie, why would he admit to lying?

If you had the full weight and power coupled with the financial resources of the United States Government coming after you, I will submit that you would admit to nailing Jesus Christ to the Cross, being Jack the Ripper and any number of other issues.

The facts remain, Russia did aid Trump in the 2016 election, Putin did admit he intentionally helped Trump win and did illegally hack and publicly release an American political parties emails to embarrass and sabotage their chances in a national election, there were dozens of contacts between Russians and the Trump campaign, Manafort did share polling data with a pro-Russian oligarch, Flynn did lie about his conversation with the Russian ambassador, Trump did on at least 10 occasions attempt to obstruct the investigation as found by the Mueller report, the only thing it didn't find was a smoking gun proving Trump was directly involved in a criminal conspiracy where he offered to get rid of sanctions for help in the election. The fact does of course remain that he did later try to get sanctions against Russia lifted after the election, so he tried to pay back Putin, we just don't have any evidence of the conspiracy, it was apparently just unspoken good will exchanged between the two of them. How the blind, deaf and dumb continue to call all the facts we know about what happened "a hoax" is still rather stunning and shows how truly brain-dead they must be.

The FACT remains, the campaign of Hillary Clinton and the DNC were in fact colluding and paying for a fictitious dossier put together by a FOREIGN AGENT working with Russian agents to besmirch now President Trump in his then to be victorious campaign for the Presidency of the United States.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
6.1.6  KDMichigan  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.3    2 months ago

Did you copy and paste this from 2016? Sounds like the same old wore out left-wing talking points. 

Remember the Republicans will never win another election? Sure you do.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.1.7  XDm9mm  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.1.3    2 months ago
Nah, the bullshit coming from the right has been ongoing for decades, this is no where near the beginning.

True, this is only the beginning of the end for the parasites that tried to destroy this country while they themselves were guilty of exactly what they were trying to accuse others of.

Get used to that smell of manure.  If you collect enough, you can sell it in some areas of the world for heating and cooking fuel.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
6.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6    2 months ago
So he didn't lie?

No he didn't. He admitted to a false charge to save his son.

The scum that framed him should be going to jail, but they probably never will.

If only I could run into them in a dark alley!

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
6.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2    2 months ago
He admitted to a false charge to save his son.

? So he had to lie to save his son? What did the FBI have on his son? If you and your son were innocent of any wrongdoing, how exactly would someone force you to admit to false charges? I'm really curious as to what scenario you can fabricate to explain this all away as a perfectly innocent incident.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
6.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.2.1    2 months ago
So he had to lie to save his son?

They do it quite a bit. Another thing they do is is to go out and get two conflicting statements. Then they call the guy they want the liar and threaten the individual with prosecution. All that has to stop. Of course this is a bit different. This was part of a Coup to take down an American President and they couldn't keep up a secret investigation of the President with Flynn in charge of National Security. It was an outrageous act and they almost got away with it because when you plead guilty to perjury, you normally wave your right to exculpatory evidence. Once the AG looked into it the rouge agents were on the hook.

Why didn't Mueller know about this?

You better brace yourself for the release of info Adam Schiff has been sitting on. That's next!

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.2.3  XDm9mm  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.2.1    2 months ago
So he had to lie to save his son? What did the FBI have on his son?

They don't need ANYTHING.   Just an accusation to force him to defend himself against financially and emotionally destroying him like they did his father.   There's a word that describes it perfectly.   

Coercion.  Look it up.

Would you sacrifice yourself to save your son, even knowing full well that you're innocent but realizing that you're nothing more than a grain of sand compared to the never ending sand dunes before you?

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.2.4  XDm9mm  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2.2    2 months ago
Why didn't Mueller know about this?

Who is saying he didn't?   Ok..   watching him "testify", he didn't know.  Hell, he was lucky he knew which hand to hold up to get sworn in.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
6.2.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2.2    2 months ago
They do it quite a bit.

So I guess you'll be able to easily list many more examples of this, right? Or even one?

This was part of a Coup

Really? I assume you have evidence to back that up, no?

Once the AG looked into it the rouge agents were on the hook.

Once partisan, hand picked Trump defenders "looked" at it  they decided it was all deep state coup conspiracy and Trump was completely innocent, like a newborn babe with cherubic wings. What a crock of horse shit that keep spilling out of your comments. It's disgusting.

You better brace yourself for the release of info Adam Schiff has been sitting on. That's next!

Yeah, and all those people you said were going to be arrested and convicted for investigating the great white dope are all behind bars now, right? I have yet to hear of anyone being indicted let alone being convicted of any crime. Why isn't Andy McCabe serving time by now? Why aren't all these supposed deep state actors behind bars by now? I won't bother bracing myself for any of your sad and ridiculous predictions to come true, it would be beyond pointless much like your constant defense of this inept moron in the oval office.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
6.2.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  XDm9mm @6.2.4    2 months ago

Correct. That was in effect the Weissmann investigation.   Weissmann being the Roy Cohn of our time.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
6.2.7  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.2.5    2 months ago
I assume you have evidence to back that up, no?

You've been given evidence. Today you should have learned that Michael Flynn was framed. By now you should have known that Carter Page's rights were violated. You should also know that the fake Steele Dossier was fraudulently used by the FBI to get FISA warrants. You should also know that an FBI lawyer deleted perrtinent information from those applications. You should also know that there was no justification for the Mueller investigation. You should know that James Comey and Andrew McCabe leaked sometimes classified and many times false info to the anti-Trump media. You should also know that Comey (Comey lied to the President & to Congress) and McCabe (McCabe lied to the FBI)lied, yet no charges have been filed. 

You should know all of that at the very least, but you still show up every day saying "wheres the evidence." 


Yeah, and all those people you said were going to be arrested and convicted for investigating the great white dope are all behind bars now, right?

That's a lie. They should be behind bars, but I know better. 

BTW it's not about me - it's about a hate filled ideology. Hopefully you'll open your eyes.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.2.8  XDm9mm  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6.2.5    2 months ago
Yeah, and all those people you said were going to be arrested and convicted for investigating the great white dope are all behind bars now, right? I have yet to hear of anyone being indicted let alone being convicted of any crime. Why isn't Andy McCabe serving time by now? Why aren't all these supposed deep state actors behind bars by now? I won't bother bracing myself for any of your sad and ridiculous predictions to come true, it would be beyond pointless much like your constant defense of this inept moron in the oval office.

Give it time boy, give it time.  The investigators want to ensure all the i's are dotted and all the t's crossed before they start bringing down the hammer.  I feel certain when those hammers start dropping, there will be a lot of former talking heads doing interviews that will be feeling like the're new names are NAIL.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.2.9  XDm9mm  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2.7    2 months ago
Hopefully you'll open your eyes.

That's a hope that will never be fulfilled.

 
 
 
Heartland American
7  Heartland American    2 months ago

A great day for true justice and a great day for America 

 
 
 
badfish
7.1  badfish  replied to  Heartland American @7    2 months ago

Obama spied on the Trump campaign - Fact

The FBI and DOJ both knew the Dossier was bogus but appointed a special counsel. They selectively leaked throughout the first 2 years of the Trump administration, much of which was classified.

Flynn was intent on auditing the Intel agencies because of glowing corruption during the Obama administration. They took him down to push the bogus Russian Collusion narrative.

This is going to accelerate TDS  so please prepare for mountains of salt on this site.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
8  Vic Eldred    2 months ago

EXbrAZnXsAAmcWr?format=png&name=360x360

"The order also requires the government to submit favorable defense evidence to the court, including possible "impeachment evidence" that could undermine witnesses, even if the government believes the evidence “not to be material.” (Sullivan still has the ultimate authority over what to do with Flynn's case, even after the DOJ withdrawal, given that a guilty plea has been entered.)

Van Grack has long informed Sullivan that the government’s so-called "Brady" obligations, referring to prosecutors' duty to turn over exculpatory materials to defendants, have been met. In an October 2019 filing, Van Grack denied governmental misconduct and assured the court that the government “has complied, and will continue to comply, with its discovery and disclosure obligations, including those imposed pursuant to Brady and the Court’s Standing Order.”

In that same October 2019 motion, Van Grack elaborated on those claims, telling Sullivan that the government had not “affirmatively suppressed evidence” or hid Brady material. He denied that the government was “aware of any information that would be favorable and material to [Flynn] at sentencing.”

Van Grack further dismissed arguments by Flynn's attorney, Sidney Powell, that “General Flynn was targeted and taken out of the Trump administration for concocted and political purposes” as “conspiracy theories.”

What Van Grack didn’t inform the court about – and didn’t provide to Flynn – was the newly  unsealed  January 4, 2017 "Closing Communication" from the FBI Washington Field Office, which recommended the FBI close its investigation of Flynn, as its exhaustive search through government databases “did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts."

Van Grack also failed to provide evidence to Flynn’s attorneys that  anti-Trump former FBI agent Peter Strzok  then immediately  intervened  and instructed the FBI case manager handling the Flynn investigation to keep the probe open, followed by  indicators  that the bureau would seek to investigate Flynn for possible violations of an obscure 18th century law known as the Logan Act -- which has never been utilized in a modern prosecution.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mueller-prosecutor-removed-from-flynn-case-after-questions-surface-concerning-his-compliance-with-court-order


First I want to thank Flynn's new Lawyer Sidney Powell, the Attorney General William Barr and of course, the honest hard working journalists at the Wall Street Journal and Fox News. It was a long time coming but we all knew this was a dirty perjury trap.

Good Job Tex in getting the story out to our readers.

As for the progressives who called it a conspiracy theory - YOU BETTER STAY HIDDEN!

 
 
 
TTGA
8.1  TTGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    2 months ago
As for the progressives who called it a conspiracy theory

Not a theory any more.  There actually was a conspiracy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
8.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  TTGA @8.1    2 months ago

Yup!

 
 
 
Tacos!
9  Tacos!    2 months ago

This poor man (and anyone associated with him) has been shamed in news media and by politicians for three years. You can be sure that the coverage of his clearing of wrongdoing will receive about 1/10,000th the effort.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

Tessylo
arkpdx
Gazoo
loki12
Adam_Selene


33 visitors