Missouri Prosecutor Declines to Charge Officer Who Killed Michael Brown

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  gooseisgone  •  one week ago  •  6 comments

Missouri Prosecutor Declines to Charge Officer Who Killed Michael Brown
“The question for this office was a simple one. Could we prove beyond a reasonable doubt that when Darren Wilson shot Micheal Brown he committed murder or manslaughter under Missouri law. After an independent and in-depth review of the evidence, we cannot prove that he did,” Bell said.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Describing the announcement as “one of the most difficult things I’ve had to do,” Bell said that his office conducted a five-month review of witness statements, forensic reports and other evidence.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
gooseisgone
1  seeder  gooseisgone    one week ago

Bell, ran on the premise he would charge Wilson, he looked at the evidence for 5 months to find out the only crime was committed was by Michael Brown.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1  MAGA  replied to  gooseisgone @1    one week ago

I guess it took him that long to figure out that if the Obama AG and justice department couldn’t charge him, that he wasn’t going to find anything either...

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.1  seeder  gooseisgone  replied to  MAGA @1.1    one week ago
I guess it took him that long to figure out that if the Obama AG and justice department couldn’t charge him

and the whole "Hand Up Don't Shot" was a lie.

 
 
 
Tacos!
2  Tacos!    one week ago
Missouri Prosecutor Declines To Charge Officer Who Killed Michael Brown

What the . . . ?! This prosecutor is obviously just another racist a-hole who hates black people.

Meet Prosecuting Attorney for St. Louis County, Wesley Bell:

ap8829b0f43fd245dbb7477fa914717344.jpg

Oh. Nevermind.

 
 
 
Tacos!
3  Tacos!    one week ago
But, he said, “our investigation does not exonerate Darren Wilson.”

This is a shitty thing to say. It's like saying "We all know he's guilty, but for . . . uh . . . reasons . . . we can't convict him. But you people know what's up, right?"

What can be the point of this statement except to further smear the reputation of Darren Wilson and boost Bell's political image? There is no reason to make this qualification. It's not as if key evidence is being hidden. It's not like Darren Wilson refused to cooperate with the investigation. This is why it sucks that public prosecutors are elected. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
4  Sean Treacy    one week ago

That “hands up, dont shoot “ hoax was incredibly damaging to the country.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

loki12
Dismayed Patriot
JBB
CB
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
MAGA


65 visitors