╌>

Magic Underwear Explained

  

Category:  Religion & Ethics

Via:  hal-a-lujah  •  11 years ago  •  12 comments

Magic Underwear Explained
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mormons-address-mystery-surrounding-undergarments/ar-BBau1jC SALT LAKE CITY The Mormon church is addressing the mystery that has long surrounded undergarments worn by its faithful with a new video explaining the practice in-depth while admonishing ridicule from outsiders about what it considers a symbol of Latter-day Saints' devotion to God.The four-minute video on The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' website compares the white, two-piece cotton "temple garments" to holy vestments worn in other religious faiths such as a Catholic nun's habit or a Muslim skullcap.The footage is part of a recent effort by the Salt Lake City-based religion to explain, expand or clarify on some of the faith's more sensitive beliefs. Articles posted on the church's website in the past two years have addressed the faith's past ban on black men in the lay clergy; its early history of polygamy; and the misconception that members are taught they'll get their own planet in the afterlife.The latest video dispels the notion that Latter-day Saints believe temple garments have special protective powers, a stereotype perpetuated on the Internet and in popular culture by those who refer to the sacred clothing as "magical Mormon underwear.""These words are not only inaccurate but also offensive to members," the video says. "There is nothing magical or mystical about temple garments, and church members ask for the same degree of respect and sensitivity that would be afforded to any other faith by people of goodwill."The video and accompanying article feature more detailed information about the garments than has ever before been released to the public, Mormon scholars say.It was made to fill a void on the Internet, which has little, if any, accurate information about the undergarments, church spokesman Eric Hawkins said in a statement.The video, also available on YouTube, explains that the undergarments are worn daily by devout adult Latter-day Saints as a reminder of their commitment to God to live good, honorable lives.The garments, which resemble a T-shirt and shorts, are shown laid out on a table in what marks a rare public glimpse at clothing that normally is hidden from outsiders. Members are taught not to hang the garments in public places to dry or display them in view of people "who do not understand their significance."The video comes two years after jabs about the undergarments were lobbed at Mitt Romney in 2012 with the intent to damage his candidacy as the first Mormon presidential nominee of a major political party.At one point during the campaign, New York Times columnist Charles Blow tweeted, "I'm a single parent and my kids are amazing! Stick that in your magic underwear," after Romney decried the country's rate of out-of-wedlock births.The video's focus on the offensiveness of flippant remarks about the undergarments shows the church no longer will tolerate them, Armand Mauss, a retired professor of sociology and religious studies at Washington State University.The church has some 15 million members worldwide.Latter-day Saints seem pleased by the refreshing transparency from the church on a topic that has been the source of much curiosity among outsiders, some whom are rude about it, said Jana Riess, who blogs about Mormonism for the Religion News Service.She wrote this week that she hopes the footage will "persuade gawkers that there's nothing to see here, folks.""They now have something official to point to if people ask questions," Riess said in an interview. "I love that they put it on YouTube for the entire world to see. I think that's very brave."

Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   seeder  Hal A. Lujah    11 years ago
"The video's focus on the offensiveness of flippant remarks about the undergarments shows the church no longer will tolerate them, Armand Mauss, a retired professor of sociology and religious studies at Washington State University."Lol - no longer will tolerate?!
 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   seeder  Hal A. Lujah    11 years ago
Isn't "Mormon comedian" a contradiction in terms? Remember Romney's 'who let the dogs out?'
 
 
 
Miss_Construed
Freshman Silent
link   Miss_Construed    11 years ago

I have a friend who is now ex-Mormon. She had a Mormon wedding ceremony and a traditional one. She said that in the Mormon ceremony they are married in their holy garments and that they are each given a name. The husband is allowed to know the wife's name, but she isnt allowed to know his. So that when they reach heaven, the husband can call for his wife by name to have her by his side or he can not call her.

She is what I would call a militant agnostic and he supports her at home, but not in front of their collective family.

She was the breadwinner for a long time and their combined family shamed them into moving home and making her stay home when she had a kid. Prior to their move, the father was stay at home dad and loved it.

They soon found themselves living with her parents because the husband couldn't provide as well as she could and eventually moved away again so that she could work.

Anyway... long story short... some of those church-family dynamics can be very oppressive.

 
 
 
Larry Hampton
Professor Quiet
link   Larry Hampton    11 years ago

It would be more holy if they took images from gods creation, tiger stripes, leopard spots, Holstein cow...

:~)

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   seeder  Hal A. Lujah    11 years ago
I admit that I only know one Mormon, but he and his family are a mess. They have ten kids, the older ones are having problems with drugs, the younger ones will probably follow in their footsteps. I worked with the dad, who is a morbidly obese oaf who would leer at young girls while pumping gas at the gas station. He made nowhere near enough money to support that size of a family, so she had to go to work, but her unskilled labor job didn't make much of a dent. We no longer work together, so I don't know how bad things have gotten. I feel so sorry for those kids though. They have nothing to look forward to in life.
 
 
 
Aeonpax
Freshman Silent
link   Aeonpax    11 years ago

I'm biased against Mormons.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   seeder  Hal A. Lujah    11 years ago
Some are kookier than others regardless of timespan. Believers like to claim that even Albert Einstein believed in God. If you could call his beliefs a religion, it would be one bazillion times less kooky than any organized religion.
 
 
 
Swamijim sez
Freshman Silent
link   Swamijim sez    11 years ago

Did L Ron have magic underwear? Or was it just the magic tin cans?

 
 
 
Swamijim sez
Freshman Silent
link   Swamijim sez    11 years ago

Aw, c'mon, Mickey... just look:

Tom Cruise, John Travolta, Kirstie Alley, Edgar Winter, Charles Manson...

Ummm (as Ruth Buzzey used to say--) 'Never Mind'

 
 
 
Enoch
Masters Quiet
link   Enoch    11 years ago

Dear Friend Swamijim: I think you mean the late great Gilda Radner, who played her characterEmily Litella, who finished her malapropism bits with "Never Mind".

Enoch.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   seeder  Hal A. Lujah    11 years ago
I remember her - wasn't she concerned about conserving our natural race horses? :)
 
 
 
Enoch
Masters Quiet
link   Enoch    11 years ago

Dear Friend Hal: Yes. Other of her concerns were Fraud in Presidential Erections, and Preserving Endangered Feces.

I enjoyed watching Emily Litellavision.

E.

 
 

Who is online

Trout Giggles
Hallux
devangelical
Sparty On


70 visitors