╌>

3 Children and 3 Adults Were Shot And Killed At A School Shooting Today, And It Doesnt Even Feel Like News

  
By:  John Russell  •  last year  •  116 comments


3 Children and 3 Adults Were Shot And Killed At A School Shooting Today, And It Doesnt Even Feel Like News
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


3 nine year olds and 3 adults were shot and killed by a 28 year old woman at a grammar school in Nashville today. Reports are the shooter was armed with two "assault style" rifles and a handgun. 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    last year

A few years ago this would be an all day news story dominating every channel. Now it is just another day in America. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

Sad but true.  Mental health illness seems to grow with every year in our society.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    last year

Sad but true.  Mental health illness seems to grow with every year in our society.

So we should make guns more available to the mentally ill.. Seems legit. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
1.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.1    last year
So we should make guns more available to the mentally ill.. Seems legit. 

My comment didn't imply that in anyway.

 
 
 
goose is back
Sophomore Guide
1.2  goose is back  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year
A few years ago this would be an all day news story dominating every channel

Did you ever think it doesn't fit the narrative?

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.3  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year
A few years ago this would be an all day news story dominating every channel. Now it is just another day in America. 

No, this incident would not have received much coverage even a few years ago.  Nothing about the incident fits the media bias.

The attacker doesn't fit the media bias.  The victims don't fit that bias.  The school doesn't fit that bias.  The actions of the cops don't fit that bias.

Bodycam video shows an assault rifle heading up the stairs to confront the attacker.  So, even that doesn't fit the media bias.

The media can't use this incident to feed their own bias.  So, obviously it's not news.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    last year

If the shooter is who the online reports indicates, it won't be for long. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    last year

Too bad this transgender killer wasnt armed with a squirt gun. Then it wouldnt matter what the "identification" was, would it? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  author  JohnRussell    last year
Rachel Diane
@ladyracheldiane
·
It’s so insane that majority of school shooters and mass murderers who kill innocent people are white, straight men, and republicans don’t do anything about it, but once it was unconfirmed that the Nashville shooter could be a transgender person, they pay attention.
FsQa0CaaIAIzfqg?format=jpg&name=small
 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
3.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year

Any demographic stats?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1    last year

Tell us about all the gang warfare shootouts that prove that black people are the real mass killers. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
3.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    last year

I don’t know about gang warfare but:

Between 1982 and February 2023, 73 out of the 140 mass shootings in the United States 73 were carried out by white shooters. By comparison, the perpetrator was African American in 25 mass shootings, and Latino in 11. When calculated as percentages, this amounts to 52 percent, 17 percent, and eight percent respectively.
 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.2    last year

Latinos are underrepresented then.

Latinos outnumber blacks in America.

Those numbers you provided look pretty close in line with the numbers for the general population.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
3.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.3    last year

Can’t find the numbers but it would be interesting to see urban versus rural demographics.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.5  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    last year

A lot of people being killed by gang violence, including little kids and innocent women.

Especially in big cities.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1.5    last year

You deflect.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year

And yet you ignore and forget the inconvenient truth that black-on-black shootings account for more total victims over time.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @3.2    last year

Again you deflect.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
3.2.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.1    last year

Deflect?  Isn't your issue the number of Americans killed by homicide?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year

 s o insane that majority of school shooters and mass murderers who kill innocent people are white, straight men

75% of the mass shootings in 2021 were committed by blacks. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.3.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.3    last year

mass shootings done as part of gang activity and gang warfare should be a separate category.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.3.2  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  JohnRussell @3.3.1    last year

same as suicide by firearm shouldnt even be counted as gun violence ...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.4  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year
It’s so insane that majority of school shooters and mass murderers who kill innocent people are white, straight men, and republicans don’t do anything about it, but once it was unconfirmed that the Nashville shooter could be a transgender person, they pay attention.

It's okay though.  Our children are safe from drag shows.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.4.1  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @3.4    last year
Our children are safe from drag shows.   (bolding is mine to enhance what I'm talking about)

Not all drag shows are equal.  Do you approve of this sort of action at a drag show against a child under the age of 18?

A North Carolina public school says it's exploring ways to "revise campus policies" after children as young as 14 were invited to a drag queen show on campus.

Forsyth Technical Community College in Winston-Salem was thrust into the national spotlight Tuesday after a video published by Libs of TiktTok showed a drag queen straddling a young girl during an LGBTQ Pride Festival at the school.

The school confirmed in an earlier statement that students of all ages were allowed to attend, and photos posted by the school’s official Instagram account showed drag queens posing with young girls

And before you disregard or ignore this due to the source...

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
3.4.2  CB  replied to  Snuffy @3.4.1    last year

The queen should not have 'forgot' herself and maybe she went too far in that single instance. That said, a policy change (which I understand North Carolina schools are looking into) can fix this, without a ban . That said, thi s queen is tone-deaf to an understanding and acceptance that there are conservatives itching to take a 'moment' and exploit it as the norm. Perhaps, it would benefit "her" to take a sensitivity course to stay above the 'fold' on contact or simulated contact with young adults.

Drag queens are under the spotlight now and they need to be cautious and uniform in their approach to these 'hours.' 

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9026f716-8e2a-476e-bf79-f89fc428c3a5_503x655.png

It is evidently clear that these queens were "Special Guests" headliners on the flyer.  Also, by virtue of its description anyone attending a PRIDE FESTIVAL can take for granted some 'risque' performances will be on the bill.

In an explicit video obtained by Libs of TikTok, one drag queen was seen performing a lap dance for someone reported to be a student [age not certain - CB] , while others cheered and staff looked on and laughed. Some parents were outraged that although faculty members and campus police were present, no one attempted to ensure that underage students were prevented from participating in the drag event. Forsyth Tech maintained that faculty, staff and campus police were there to “make sure that this was a safe event for our students.”

There were adults present. There were religious leaders present. Even faculty, staff, and campus police were present. This event evidently did not go to far as no one was arrested. Although, conservatives were offended.

The queens should self-censor their routines, but I reckon they have their 'stage reputation' to keep intact—it is their business model after all.

Are some conservatives 'outraged' by the 'act' of simulating a lap dance (for mere seconds on the clock), of course. How could some conservatives not be?

I mean no malicious intent meant by this: But, these drag events are for (young) people who want to be there/need this 'outlet' - not for old people who are set in their ways and judgemental about well, 'everything.'  Again, no bad intent is meant about stating the obvious. For a great many older folks, this is their 'first' time brushing up against what drag queens do for a living and in their own limelights!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.4.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @3.4.1    last year
Do you approve of this sort of action at a drag show against a child under the age of 18?

The action of a drag queen posing with young girls?  Were the girls ted up or forced to be in those photos?  If not, then why shouldn't they be allowed to?  Are you afraid that gayness is contagious?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.4.4  Tacos!  replied to  Ozzwald @3.4.3    last year
Are you afraid that gayness is contagious?

They’re convinced of it.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.4.5  Ozzwald  replied to  Tacos! @3.4.4    last year

They’re convinced of it.

If you put out that rumor, DeSantis will be the first one mandating masks. jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.4.6  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @3.4.3    last year
Do you approve of this sort of action at a drag show against a child under the age of 18?
The action of a drag queen posing with young girls?  Were the girls ted up or forced to be in those photos?  If not, then why shouldn't they be allowed to?  Are you afraid that gayness is contagious?

If you had read the story or even read what I highlighted in my post, you should have been able to understand that it was not a drag queen "posing" with a young girl, it was a drag queen straddling and giving a lap dance to a young girl.  By your dismissive post I must take from it that you approve of such actions.  So you approve of a man in drag thrusting his crotch into a young girl.   Well damn...   That's not gayness being contagious, that's an adult committing sex abuse on a minor.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.4.7  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @3.4.6    last year
it was not a drag queen "posing" with a young girl, it was a drag queen straddling and giving a lap dance to a young girl.  By your dismissive post I must take from it that you approve of such actions.

Are they with the "young" girls consent?  What do you mean "young", this occurred at a college, so what was the age of this specific "young girl"?  

So you approve of a man in drag thrusting his crotch into a young girl

You like using the word "young" just like the article you referenced.  What was her age????  At a college, she could have been in her 20's, but since that does not fit your narrative, you just keep repeating "young".

That's not gayness being contagious, that's an adult committing sex abuse on a minor.

For god's sake!!!!  Prove she was a minor, and prove it was not consensual!!!!!

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.4.8  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @3.4.7    last year

The college has students as young as 14, had  you read any of the links you would have seen that.  The article also stated there were minors present and the article states the girl in question is "young" but nowhere does it state the age of the girl.  But  your disregard to the lapdance and pelvic grinding in this setting...   

I refuse to converse with anybody who would attempt to excuse this sort of behaviour.  This is not drag queens reading a book and posing with children,  this is a man in scanty clothes giving a lap dance to a "young" girl and in front of minors.  There is no excuse for dismissing this sort of action.

Just fuck off and go away.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.4.9  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @3.4.8    last year
The college has students as young as 14

Or as old as??????

had you read any of the links you would have seen that.

I saw it, been has nothing to do with the specific action you are referencing.  How old was the girl that was being given the "lap dance" that you are so outraged about???

The article also stated there were minors present

So what?  Everyone was fully dressed.  Do we need Kevin Bacon to explain to you that there is nothing wrong with dancing?

and the article states the girl in question is "young" but nowhere does it state the age of the girl.

So you admit that the article is just trying to stir up bigotry.  "Young" is relative.  I am in my 60's and have still been addressed as "young man" by even older people.

But  your disregard to the lapdance and pelvic grinding in this setting

I assume you were equally insulted and outraged by Elvis the pelvis?

I refuse to converse with anybody who would attempt to excuse this sort of behaviour.

The behavior of grown adults dancing????

This is not drag queens reading a book and posing with children,  this is a man in scanty clothes giving a lap dance to a "young" girl and in front of minors.

giphy.gif?cid=6c09b9528a634663dc572d08994fea233ba7918808d841d4&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  author  JohnRussell    last year
LoneStarPatriot73 @LSPSDevelopment
Funny how a gun control lobbyist and fascist from Highland Park Illinois just happens to be in Nashville (supposed vacation) and shows up at the scene. She is a Commie liar who lives in a place with some of the strictest gun control. How did that gun control work out for you?
 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5  Texan1211    last year

Why does a school shooting have to evolve into a bitchfest about race?

 
 
 
shona1
PhD Quiet
5.1  shona1  replied to  Texan1211 @5    last year

Morning Texan...good bloody question..

All I see is Americans shooting Americans...and how do you say it..how dumbass is that..and worse little kids. 🥀🥀🥀

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  shona1 @5.1    last year
.good bloody question..

Some people have no good questions. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  shona1 @5.1    last year
All I see is Americans shooting Americans...and how do you say it..how dumbass is that..and worse little kids.

It is indeed a tragedy, only made worse by people trying to make it a racial thing.

Completely stupid when people have just been shot and killed, but expected here.

You'll find no answers here to my question.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    last year

It appears the killer left a manifesto and a map of how it was to play out. 

A tragic hate crime.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7  Sean Treacy    last year

An English Professor at Wayne State University responding to the Stanford Law incident:

"I think it is far more admirable to kill a racist, homophobic, or transphobic speaker than it is to shout them down,"

The buzz word on the left a few months ago was stochastic terrorism.  I doubt they'll be making that argument anytime soon. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7.1  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    last year
An English Professor at Wayne State University responding to the Stanford Law incident: "I think it is far more admirable to kill a racist, homophobic, or transphobic speaker than it is to shout them down,"

Words probably supported wholly by many on the left.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8  Kavika     last year

It was reported that the shooter, Audrey Hale once attended the school.

Sadly, we have three dead children and three adults. Many lives lost and many more will be devasted by this shooting. 

Just another day in America.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
9  Buzz of the Orient    last year

"And it doesn't even feel like news."  That's because it ISN'T news - something that happens every day isn't news.  Did you wake up this morning - well that's not news, right?- because you wake up every morning.  What IS news is something that DOESN'T happen every day.   Welcome to America.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
10  bbl-1    last year

Even this does not matter.  A republican congress person commenting on a similar event recently stated that, "This is the price of freedom."  I assume he was equating the assault rifle as freedom and dead kids in a school on the same level as dead soldiers on the beaches of Normandy.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
10.1  Texan1211  replied to  bbl-1 @10    last year
I assume he was equating the assault rifle as freedom and dead kids in a school on the same level as dead soldiers on the beaches of Normandy

Maybe your assumptions need some work.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
11  pat wilson    last year

We are now averaging about 1.5 mass shootings per day since 1/2023.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
11.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  pat wilson @11    last year

Exactly, we have too many crazy people in this country.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
12  author  JohnRussell    last year
Shannon Watts
@shannonrwatts
THIS is last year's Christmas card from Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles, a Republican who represents the district that Covenant School is in in Nashville. #tnleg
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
12.1  author  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @12    last year

What would ever possess someone to put a picture of the family toting guns on a Christmas card? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
12.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @12.1    last year

The left seems angrier at him than the left wing terrorist who killed kids. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
12.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @12.1.1    last year
left wing terrorist

Seems weird since, "leftists" hate guns. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
12.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  MrFrost @12.1.2    last year
Seems weird since, "leftists" hate guns.

Lol.  If only history didn't exist, you'd have an argument. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
12.1.4  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @12.1.2    last year

Whatever, but most of the shooters have been lefities.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
12.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  Greg Jones @12.1.4    last year
most of the shooters have been lefities.

It's  not right wingers shooting up left wing cities, that's for sure. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
12.1.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @12.1.1    last year

They are probably going to have a committee and try to legislate what can and can not be on Christmas cards.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
12.2  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @12    last year

So the hell what?

Were the guns all legally bought? Are they holding them wrong? All of their fingers seem to be well off the triggers. 

I know it must be the big scary black guns they are holding. 

Or is it that they are white! That is it; they are showing their white privilege by making a family X-mas cards that they know will be offensive to leftist loons!

The little one holding the X-mas card is the worst- not a single minority pictured in the card. A white family with a non racially diverse card? How dare they?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.2.1  cjcold  replied to  Ronin2 @12.2    last year

 I'm curious as to why he has a silencer (suppressor) on his rifle.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
12.2.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @12.2.1    last year

Protect their hearing?

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
12.2.3  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  cjcold @12.2.1    last year

you do know that until that NFA in the 30s , that they were not only legal , but common on may sporting rifles from the turn of the 1900s until then , usually found on shotguns though  because of the louder report . 

 it could also be a muzzle brake  and not a flash hider /disperser or a silencer/ suppressor at all 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
12.2.4  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @12.2    last year

crucifix immersed in urine ( Piss Christ "art")

131126152944-controversial-art-8-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg

gun love christmas card

FsPocbRaMAAS8t3?format=jpg&name=900x900

equally offensive?

one but not the other?

the idea that a christmas card with a family brandishing guns and smiles would not offend a lot of people is bizarre. Unless they are not Christians and unless they just celebrate Christmas as a secular holiday. I think we both know that is not the case with an extremely conservative politician from Tennessee. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.2.5  cjcold  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @12.2.3    last year

I own several flash hiders and compensators for the AR platform.

That can is neither. They also make fake empty silencers...Why?

It could also be a golf ball launcher. Just add blanks and balls.

Yes, one can actually shoot golf balls from an AR platform.

One can also shoot .22 LR by just swapping out the bolt and mag.

The AR-15 is a very versatile ranch rifle that suffers due to its looks.

The Ruger Mini-14 rifle slips under the radar simply due to its looks.

They are both able to fill tight groups at 500 yards with the same mag.

But I digress.

As fond as I am of the rifle, It seems very creepy on a Christmas card.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
12.2.6  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @12.2.4    last year
the idea that a christmas card with a family brandishing guns and smiles would not offend a lot of people is bizarre. Unless they are not Christians and unless they just celebrate Christmas as a secular holiday. I think we both know that is not the case with an extremely conservative politician from Tennessee. 

The Hale family wouldn't pose with firearms for any occasion.  The Hale family doesn't fit the narrative so it's necessary to find a surrogate.

How many people have Andy Ogles and his family shot?  How many schools have the Ogles family attacked?  The Ogles family aren't using guns to commit a crime.  The poses don't appear to be threatening or intimidating.  And there isn't anything that identifies the intended audience for the photograph.

So, a story has been concocted about a photograph to fit particular biases.  And that concocted story serves as a distraction to avoid confronting the reality that the actual incident doesn't fit the particular bias.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
12.2.7  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  cjcold @12.2.5    last year

well looking at the photo a lot closer , it actually looks like some sort of cloth cover with velcro to keep it in place , and if it is a cover like that , no telling whats under it until its removed , what purpose a cover like that would serve and what its covering is anyones guess , but thats what it would be from a photo , a wild assed guess. just like trying to say what each of those rifles is chambered in from that photo , one could make an educated WAG.

not only can one launch golf balls , but they make one that does the same thing for tennis balls ....those are fun with dogs ....

 the mini 14( poor mans AR) use to slip under the radar , it isnt anymore , it doesnt have the ability to be customized to the individual that the AR does , and part of the reason it use to slip under was it was made with traditional wood fabrication(stock ) ., other than that from first gen mini to current itineration , it too has evolved and used less wood and more composit or "plastic' than it use too.

 both fire arms basically fall into  the accuracy you get is what your willing to spend on them cat with me , top the mini with decent optics and it has reasonable and decent accuracy , same with the AR , i did when i did my AR build go "unconventional", yet remained 94 ban compliant .

 i opted for a 24 in long bull barrel( 4 inches longer than a common heavy barrel of 18-20 and a lot more metal in the barrel ) with a slightly different twist rate . those 2 changes gained me about another 250-300 yards of accurate range within a 6 inch disc. I also opted for a target crown at the muzzle , no compensator or flash hider at all.

and as i know you know , swapping out to a different upper , changes the whole thing and appearance .

 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
12.2.8  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @12.2.6    last year
So, a story has been concocted about a photograph to fit particular biases.  And that concocted story serves as a distraction to avoid confronting the reality that the actual incident doesn't fit the particular bias.

Nothing has been concocted. Ogles is the US representative for the area where the school shooting took place. His promotion of guns on a Christmas card is relevant to a great many people. 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
12.2.9  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @12.2.8    last year
Nothing has been concocted. Ogles is the US representative for the area where the school shooting took place. His promotion of guns on a Christmas card is relevant to a great many people. 

How is a photograph of Ogles and his family relevant?  

Concocting a story to create phony relevance ain't that relevant.  You know, banning all guns would not have done one damned thing to help Audrey Hale deal with whatever problem she was facing.  The phony relevance for gun bans would have just swept Audrey Hale under the rug.  That's consistent with most liberal activism.  If it's Not In My Backyard, it's Not My Problem.  So, the photograph of Ogles and his family really only has NIMBY relevance.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
12.2.10  JBB  replied to  Nerm_L @12.2.9    last year

original

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
12.2.11  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @12.2.4    last year

Leftists argued the first was art if I remember right. Because the religious hated it; and wanted it banned.

Leftist are arguing that the Christmas card is an offense against humanity. 

I could care about either.

Piss Christ is not my cup of tea when it comes to artwork; but to each their own. The Chinese seem to love Hunter's butt ugly artwork; and the left have no problem with that.

The Christmas card is only offensive to gun grabbers (Religion has nothing to do with it). Since I am an atheist I could care less. It is their card, and they can do what they want so long as it is legal. I have seen (and received) far worse cards from people that are supposedly very religious.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
12.2.12  Ronin2  replied to  JBB @12.2.10    last year

Only to gun grabbing leftists.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
12.2.13  Nerm_L  replied to  JBB @12.2.10    last year

Gee, that's swell.  Audrey Hale's family aren't ammo-sexual.  Seems like Audrey Hale already had enough hate.  So, why feed more hate to Hale?  Or are these memes supposed to recruit more people like Audrey Hale?

Who could Audrey Hale turn to?  Where was the safety net for Hale?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.2.14  cjcold  replied to  Ronin2 @12.2.12    last year

No matter how many far right wing fascists claim (gun grabbing leftists) It's just far right wing NRA propaganda.

This centrist owns many firearms just because they're fun to shoot.

From my back porch it is 125 yards to a ten-inch steel plate.

I hit it standing more often than not with a scoped AR-15 5.56. 

My Lapua .338 tears holes in it. Best hot long distance round ever!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.2.15  cjcold  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @12.2.7    last year
for tennis balls

Still have to love any rifle that can shoot a grand!

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.2.16  cjcold  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @12.2.7    last year

The problem being is that some swaps make one a criminal.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
12.2.17  Ronin2  replied to  cjcold @12.2.14    last year

Would love to get into long range shooting; but it is too expensive. Decking out a long range rifle the right way alone would do me in even before factoring in the costs for ammunition. Not to mention the range costs; and getting someone to instruct me.

I own three guns- all for home defense. What money I spend on ammunition is for them. I own a highly modified Keltec 12ga bullpup- would almost feel sorry for anyone stupid enough to try and come upstairs uninvited. With the house's narrow stairs and hallways nothing would be left except a fine red mist. Compartmentalized rooms offer no place to hide- except for the basement- which for whatever reason is wide open. Have hand guns, a Rhino revolver for the main floor, and the basement a Sig Saur P365. 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
12.2.18  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  cjcold @12.2.16    last year

very true , but that is on the person to know and follow the law .

 Now i COULD take an AR pistol upper and swap it out , but unless i paid the NFA tax and had the permit , it would be considered an SBR ( short barreled rifle ) and in violation without  the permit and paid tax IF i kept the rifle stocks in place  . but as long as i stay with a barrel length over 16 in perfectly legal  or if i take the rifle stock off and make it strictly a pistol platform . no tax or permit needed  if those things are done . it entirely depends on what furniture is on the firearm that designates it rifle or pistol . rifle butt stock collapsible or not , its a rifle .

* the cow elk i took this past season was take with a .338, win mag not lapua  @ in the 250 yrd range  and i slowed it down with my reloads  to under 2900 fps using a 200 grn bullet ,  one and done .

 
 
 
Waykwabu
Freshman Silent
12.3  Waykwabu  replied to  JohnRussell @12    last year

That's why I won't take my vacation in America !

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13  Trout Giggles    last year

But why? Why is nobody asking that question?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @13    last year

What question, TG?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @13.1    last year

Why...why did this happen? What was the motive?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1.2  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @13.1.1    last year

Ashley Hale's manifesto has not been released yet or spoken out of.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
13.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  CB @13.1.2    last year

Yes, the trans activists are pressuring to keep it hidden from the public. Probably because it blames country music….

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @13.1.2    last year

I hope after the investigation that it is released

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
13.1.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  CB @13.1.2    last year

They have "released" tidbits of notes they found through the press conferences as that is where they discovered that there were other sites in the planning and at least one of them was written off as they had too much security to be considered.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1.6  CB  replied to  Sean Treacy @13.1.3    last year

I don't/won't give Ashley Hale any cover from her misdeeds. She did this. After all, there is no mention of her being on hormone therapy that I have read or learned.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1.7  CB  replied to  Trout Giggles @13.1.4    last year

Me too! She needs to let us know why she, a woman, would harm anybody-especially innocent kids. Kids have limited to no special power in society to effectuate change!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1.8  CB  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @13.1.5    last year

Goes to how narrowly focused mentally illness can be. That is, 'tactical planning and reasoning' still intact! She did this! A female did this! Ashley Hale is her name and she is solely responsible for doing this!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
13.1.9  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @13.1.5    last year

I have read , there was another school , and a shopping mall that was supposedly targeted , the other school was public and had a resource officer on duty , and a mall , well  with it being a public place and people allowed to carry concealed .....

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
13.1.10  Greg Jones  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @13.1.9    last year

They finally put SRO's back in Denver schools last week, after a 17 year old kid....who was expelled from another school, had to have a "pat down" inspection every day at East High School. He shot two administrators and escaped to the mountains, where he committed suicide. Both victims survived.

Sounds like the kid never had a decent chance and was just warehoused around by the schools.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1.11  CB  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @13.1.9    last year

Here's a consideration: If we keep escalating where, when, how many, guns are reasonable to be or feel safe - as what 'saturation point' does the inverse happen? That is, even safe gun owners begin to question the wisdom of who is safe when everybody is clearly 'packin'?  Ashley Hale chose the point of less resistance, but then again she was 'manned up' for serious 'combat.' (Though she appears to have died as a 'wimp.')

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
13.1.12  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  CB @13.1.11    last year
she was 'manned up' for serious 'combat.

The term usually used there is "tacticool "  usually just to look badassed and threatening . most people cant tell if someone is wearing a load bearing vest , a plate carrier or body armor , hell just a vest with mags is intimidating and people will think its armor and its not  . the type of people that employ that are those that want to make the impression they have some sort of training or abilities  and they usually dont . they will most likely open carry in plain sight , with either a drop leg holster , or a really ornate one tucked into a LEO/FBI style carry but highly visible . and they are real easy to embarrass if one wants to take the time and knows what they are talking about .

I have the option of 2 different types of carry here where i live , open , in plain sight for all to see, only time i use that one is if im doing fence work and repair  for myself or if i hire out to help a neighbor . have never had a problem with it because people see that type of work being done they think wow old west ( yes i do wear an old ,30 yrs , silver belly stetson that sorta looks like kevin costners in open range , its been beaten battered and pissed on by mother nature natural sweat of the brow , and a few fell beasts of the land ), and well he is prepared , most understand snakes and other things that happen along that might need that type of solution .

The other option i have which i use when going around people in public ,is concealed , usually covered /concealed out of sight by a shirt coat vest , and if i do it right , no one is the wiser and i just appear to be an old duffing gray haired man with a walking stick /cane . If it is noticed  and asked about it , my simple response is , because i can, its usually dropped at that , and usually because i give them a sam elliot look like im about to ask them to show me the teets on an almond to get almond milk . that annoyed look one doesnt wanna screw with .

 if im carrying concealed its because something told me ( hunch) something wasnt right  and today it isnt exactly a virtue to trust everyone you come into contact with , it would be nice , but it can get you killed in a heart beat . 

besides not only do i follow what the law says I CAN do and when to use it , i have my own set of rules even more stringent than state law i must follow .

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1.13  CB  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @13.1.12    last year

Thanks. I take your point. In my comment 13.1.11 I am more 'impressed' by the weaponry Ashley Hale is said to have been 'packing.' And how she shot out and stepped through the 'entry' ways to enter into the building. Of course, she drew down on anything real and imagined in the video of the 'invasion.' That's more of what I meant. The authorities are saying she exhibited some training in her stances and demeanor, I don't know this for sure because I do not have such access to the footage about her. So I use the termage: "manned up" loosely.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
13.1.14  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  CB @13.1.13    last year

no worries ,  i watched the video of the  entry , it appears a  9mm kel-tec  rifle was used for breaching the window glass, its a pistol round chambered rifle , and does seem to be the predominant weapon used in the movement through the building that could be seen. so what armament was reported by media at first doesnt seem to be what existed . though i did see both the kel-tec and an AR, neither can be confused for the other , and of course the after shots of all 3 weapons , the AR,kel-tec , and the S&W MP , likely either a 9mm or a 40 , but that is a WAG ( wild assed guess ). i havent heard how many shots were fired total , the AR was capable of 30, the 9mm looked to have a 32 round stick mag , and the MP depending on chambering ? 15 to 18 ?

I think i read somewhere that the individual liked video games , one can pick up some rudimentary things such as tactics but not everything , as for stances and that could have been acquired with range time practicing shooting , hell someone might have even helped  at a range and corrected improper stance or technique , ive done it myself with shooters just starting out with their permission .

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
13.1.15  cjcold  replied to  Trout Giggles @13.1.1    last year
What was the motive?

Sometimes it just comes down to bad wiring and drain bammage.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
13.1.16  CB  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @13.1.14    last year

Good points all! Well-received.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
13.2  JBB  replied to  Trout Giggles @13    last year

Why? Why were there more mass shootings than days this month? Because it is easy as hell for the criminally insane to get guns in the US!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
14  Tacos!    last year

As soon as we ban all the right books, this will stop.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Senior Guide
14.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tacos! @14    last year

I thought it would have stopped when they cut Mr. Potato Heads nuts off.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
15  Gsquared    last year

We should recognize the principled stance of those who would willingly sacrifice their children or grandchildren, or other people's children or grandchildren, so that the manufacturers of the AR-15 can continue to profit.

 
 
 
goose is back
Sophomore Guide
15.1  goose is back  replied to  Gsquared @15    last year
so that the manufacturers of the AR-15 can continue to profit.

You may want to include Hollywood, video game manufactures and the Music industry on the people who profit.  I have yet to see a Firearms Manufacturer or the NRA advertising the use of an AR-15 but I can turn on the TV, go to apps on a phone, see a movie or listen to a rap station and see or hear about guns non-stop. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
15.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  goose is back @15.1    last year
I have yet to see a Firearms Manufacturer or the NRA advertising the use of an AR-15

Gun companies emphasize masculinity and make veiled references to white supremacist groups to sell AR-15-style rifles, congressional committee report says 

The Militarized Marketing of Bushmaster Assault Rifles 

see or hear about guns 

You must certainly believe that more guns make us safer, right?  So, why wouldn't you want to see or hear about guns?

 
 
 
goose is back
Sophomore Guide
15.1.2  goose is back  replied to  Gsquared @15.1.1    last year

I love how you totally ignore how youths are introduced to guns!

You may want to include Hollywood, video game manufactures and the Music industry on the people who profit.
 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
15.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  goose is back @15.1.2    last year

Aren't most youths who have or use guns introduced to guns by their parents?

Don't you support youths being introduced to guns?

Why do you seem to oppose Hollywood, video games and the Music industry "profitting" from guns?  Don't you support gun rights?  Don't you support the proliferation of guns in our society?  Don't you support the right of gun manufacturers to conduct business and make a profit?

 
 
 
goose is back
Sophomore Guide
15.1.4  goose is back  replied to  Gsquared @15.1.3    last year

See 16

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
15.1.5  cjcold  replied to  goose is back @15.1.2    last year

I'm 68 and was introduced to guns by my gun-owning family before being trained by the NRA.as a Boy Scout. 

Never was a hunter but have always loved punching holes in paper from a long, long, long way away.

Hitting thousand yard shots makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
15.1.6  Gsquared  replied to  goose is back @15.1.4    last year

See 16.2

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
15.1.7  cjcold  replied to  Gsquared @15.1.1    last year

Actually own a highly modified Bushmaster.

And yet am still a liberal 

 
 
 
goose is back
Sophomore Guide
16  goose is back    last year
Aren't most youths who have or use guns introduced to guns by their parents?

I have no data on this but, I would say the ones that "don't" randomly shoot people, yes. 

Don't you support youths being introduced to guns?

Yes, if the person who is provding the teaching is a responsible gun owner and not Cornpop on the corner. 

Why do you seem to oppose Hollywood, video games and the Music industry "profitting" from guns?

I don't have a problem with it but, they need to admit responsibility for their glorifying of guns and don't seem surprised when a kid knows how to load a magazine into an AR and rack a shell having never been taught by anyone.

Don't you support gun rights? 

Yes,  good intentions don't protect you!

 
 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
16.1  cjcold  replied to  goose is back @16    last year

Pretty sure I want to be the only person on the planet to own a firearm.

Just think how much more peaceful that would be.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
16.2  Gsquared  replied to  goose is back @16    last year
Aren't most youths who have or use guns introduced to guns by their parents?
I have no data on this but, I would say the ones that "don't" randomly shoot people, yes. 

Adam Peter Lanza, the Sandy Hook Elemantary School murderer:

"Adam Peter Lanza  (April 22, 1992 – December 14, 2012) lived with his mother, Nancy Lanza, in Newtown, 5 miles (8 km) from the elementary school. [147]  He did not have a criminal record. [14] [148] [149]  He had access to guns through his mother, who was described as a "gun enthusiast who owned at least a dozen firearms". [150] [151] [152] [153] She often took her two sons to a local shooting range, where they learned to shoot."

"The parents of a teenager who killed four students at a Michigan high school can face trial for   involuntary manslaughter , the state appeals court said Thursday in a groundbreaking case of criminal responsibility for the acts of a child. The murders would not have happened if the parents hadn't purchased a gun for Ethan Crumbley..."

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
17  Just Jim NC TttH    last year

Capital in Tennessee breached by protesters!

It's an insurrection to get some worthless gun legislation discussion rolling!! Arrest them and put 'em in the slammer for two years prior to trial!!

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
17.1  George  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @17    last year

[deleted]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
17.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @17    last year

Sure now that a Christian school has been shot up. If it had been a public school there probably wouldn't have been any protestors

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
17.2.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @17.2    last year

I sincerely doubt that. Every shooting there is a call to protest................maybe not capital breaching but protest nonetheless.

Now watch some foolish, moronic dolt come along and say that Trump set the tone for protesting for GovCo action.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
17.2.2  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @17.2.1    last year
Now watch some foolish, moronic dolt come along and say that Trump set the tone for protesting for GovCo action.

Well, that or maybe that the laws passed by adults in the legislature is the reason and justification for killing kids.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
17.2.3  cjcold  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @17.2.1    last year

Trump did set the tone! 

That's why he will soon be sent to prison for his many crimes.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
17.2.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  cjcold @17.2.3    last year

And right on time as predicted.......................

256

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
18  Just Jim NC TttH    last year

But of course........................SMMFH

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
18.1  Snuffy  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @18    last year

Yeah,  I saw that.  All I can say is WTF!!!!

 
 

Who is online

shona1
devangelical
Hal A. Lujah
Ed-NavDoc
Igknorantzruls
JohnRussell
zuksam


73 visitors