Conservatives’ Crushing Counterattack In the Culture War

  
Via:  1776 Traditional American  •  one month ago  •  137 comments

By:   Kurt Schlichter

Conservatives’ Crushing Counterattack In the Culture War
All this garbage the left has pushed on us – from racial self-loathing to gender idiocy to killing babies – has catastrophic real-world consequences on real people and the people who presumed to lead us didn’t want to risk the kool kidz of kultur wagging their collective fingers at them. Trump not only cares but counterattacks. That’s why the executive order getting the government out of the racial grievance business is so important. Finally, we are able to exercise our brand of power –...

Sponsored by group The Donald on Newstalkers

The Donald on Newstalkers

deleted by SP


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



3c73a6b1-3be6-479f-aaca-9dec532b7741-500x250.jpg

Source: AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

You know, I am still not tired of all the winning. Imagine having a Republican president conserva-woke enough to issue an executive order banning the poisonous lies of critical race theory from being inflicted upon our federal workforce. Well, we do have a president fearless enough to fight back, boldly and publicly, against the noxious propaganda of the academic left we taxpayers have been shelling out millions to pay commie consultants for. And he did it in the face of the utterly predictable narrative that “Trump is racist for prohibiting indoctrinating government employees with the idea that people are good or bad based on their race!”

Do you think a Jeb!, or a Mitt! or even a Nikki! would dare stand up to that kind of heat? No, they’d be kneeling, begging for absolution from the NYT and WaPo for the sins of the GOP base not wanting to pay moral and/or financial reparations for slaves they never owned to people who were never owned.

Thanks to Donald Trump, the culture war is back on and instead of General McClellan we have General Patton, and he’s up to RINO-slap a squish.

The culture war is that thing the “fiscally conservative, socially liberal” smart set of spineless Fredocons , who are all in on the “socially liberal” part but never get around to the “fiscally conservative” part, have told us for decades is a sure loser. Now, normally one should defer to the Fredocons on losing since they are the indisputable experts, but the fact that for decades the GOP establishment refused to fight about things that our base was concerned with led to a society where people tell you their pronouns and insist dudes can get preggers. Fiscal and foreign policy stuff is important, but when some dude dangles his doings in your daughter’s locker room because now he insists that he is no longer Charlie but is, instead, Charlotte, that’s a problem. And the geniuses kept telling us “Hush, knuckledraggers, we’re too busy trying to ship your job to China because Milton Freidman told us to and we don’t have time to icky fights over the things you care about that might get us called hayseeds at the next Georgetown mixer.”

All this garbage the left has pushed on us – from racial self-loathing to gender idiocy to killing babies – has catastrophic real-world consequences on real people and the people who presumed to lead us didn’t want to risk the kool kidz of kultur wagging their collective fingers at them. Trump not only cares but counterattacks. 

That’s why the executive order getting the government out of the racial grievance business is so important. Finally, we are able to exercise our brand of power – political power, since we control the executive branch – to push back against the unaccountable and totally left cultural power of the establishment. And it’s not only the president.

We’re all supposed to applaud the kneeling zillionaires of the NFL – the most spoiled bunch of jerks on planet earth – and yet when they came out and tried to rub their cultural power in our faces, when they tried to make us just sit there and silently be insulted presented by the felons, losers, and accused sex offenders whose names were emblazoned on their helmets , tons of us refused to tune in and those who showed up live booed these pretentious twits. How dare those peasants refuse to submit to the cultural commandments of their betters!

And then there was the reaction to the despicable Netflix Cuties film, a child molester’s fantasia that disgusted the nation. Look, far be it from me to stop the blue bubble-dwelling cultural elite from selecting “You dumb Jesus people don’t appreciate why pedophilia is no big deal” as their hill to die on. As long as they die on some hill I’m not too picky about which one, but if they want to choose the one that’s even going to creep out a lot of the Democrat Party’s voters, go for it. 

The simple and indisputable fact is that within the liberal bubble there is not only huge pressure, but an ideological need, to defend any perversion that comes along. The logic of the liberal ideology makes it impossible to say “No” – if you can’t tell a dude who is manifestly a dude that “Sorry, but you are a dude,” you are probably going to have a hard time coming up with a consistent reason why it’s bad for an adult to have sex with a 14-year-old. And, at least in California, the Democrat governor just signed a bill to substantially cut the penalties for a 24-year-old to have sex – of any kind – with someone 10 years younger. Sick.

Oh, it occurs to them that normal people are disgusted and appalled, but this does not cause them to rethink their disgraceful actions but to insist we are somehow mischaracterizing what they are doing. We say they are trying to penalize pedos less, and they are. And based on their grotesque rationalizations, if you follow their twisted logic there is nothing that creates a boundary between the lessened penalties they want today and the total abandonment of the idea of the age of consent. The leftist perverts get their perversion and the rest of the leftists get to further undermine the family and society – to people who hate you, it’s a win-win.

But we’re now fighting back. People are furious with Netflix, and it seems as if the Obama-affiliated VOD service was actually stunned that people objected. After all, cultural decency rarely penetrates into the deep blue bubble, and the idea that telling someone “Hey, your perversion is not okay” is totally alien to their caste. The cultural critics adored Cuties and were scandalized that anyone might be offended by the horrific sexualization of pre-teen girls. Alyssa Rosenberg of the WaPo fumed: “ If conservatives, who have jumped on the debate over #Cuties, want to be taken seriously as cultural arbiters, they have to be able to talk about the *text* of a movie like this in an honest, responsible way. ” Well, if the price of the total rejection of pedo exploitation of kids is having people in blue metro enclaves not take us seriously, we’re ready to pay it.

Ted Cruz and Tom Cotton have gotten involved and attacked Netflix and, by extension, the leftist luminaries involved. Note that Obama, who is deeply connected with Netflix, has said zero. And, of course, there’s no outrage from the creepy, hair-sniffing weirdo who lives in a basement. But it would be no surprise to see the president tweet about it: “Many are disgusted by failing Netflix (Obama has a big-money deal with it) exploiting kids. We will investigate and prosecute perverts. Sick! LAW AND ORDER!”

The culture war is not some niche distraction for Bible thumpers and repressed weirdos channeling Chris Cooper in American Beauty . It is not an inconvenience to our GOP establishment and a frivolous distraction from the serious business of managing America’s decline to keep it at a slightly slower rate than under the Democrats. It is the battle over the things that we normal Americans live with every day. The nature of our country and society is vitally important, and we demand a say in it.

Under Trump, we have that say again, finally, and in his second term look for Donald Trump’s administration to stay on the cultural offensive.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
MAGA
1  seeder  MAGA    one month ago

Oh, it occurs to them that normal people are disgusted and appalled, but this does not cause them to rethink their disgraceful actions but to insist we are somehow mischaracterizing what they are doing. We say they are trying to penalize pedos less, and they are. And based on their grotesque rationalizations, if you follow their twisted logic there is nothing that creates a boundary between the lessened penalties they want today and the total abandonment of the idea of the age of consent. The leftist perverts get their perversion and the rest of the leftists get to further undermine the family and society – to people who hate you, it’s a win-win.

But we’re now fighting back. People are furious with Netflix, and it seems as if the Obama-affiliated VOD service was actually stunned that people objected. After all, cultural decency rarely penetrates into the deep blue bubble, and the idea that telling someone “Hey, your perversion is not okay” is totally alien to their caste. The cultural critics adored Cuties and were scandalized that anyone might be offended by the horrific sexualization of pre-teen girls. Alyssa Rosenberg of the WaPo fumed: “ If conservatives, who have jumped on the debate over #Cuties , want to be taken seriously as cultural arbiters, they have to be able to talk about the *text* of a movie like this in an honest, responsible way. ” Well, if the price of the total rejection of pedo exploitation of kids is having people in blue metro enclaves not take us seriously, we’re ready to pay it.

Ted Cruz and Tom Cotton have gotten involved and attacked Netflix and, by extension, the leftist luminaries involved. Note that Obama, who is deeply connected with Netflix, has said zero. And, of course, there’s no outrage from the creepy, hair-sniffing weirdo who lives in a basement. But it would be no surprise to see the president tweet about it: “Many are disgusted by failing Netflix (Obama has a big-money deal with it) exploiting kids. We will investigate and prosecute perverts. Sick! LAW AND ORDER!”

The culture war is not some niche distraction for Bible thumpers and repressed weirdos channeling Chris Cooper in American Beauty . It is not an inconvenience to our GOP establishment and a frivolous distraction from the serious business of managing America’s decline to keep it at a slightly slower rate than under the Democrats. It is the battle over the things that we normal Americans live with every day. The nature of our country and society is vitally important, and we demand a say in it.

Under Trump, we have that say again, finally

https://thenewstalkers.com/release-the-kraken/group_discuss/10077/conservatives-crushing-counterattack-in-the-culture-war

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MAGA @1    one month ago
 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  MAGA @1.1    one month ago
 
 
 
CB
1.2  CB   replied to  MAGA @1    one month ago
People are furious with Netflix, and it seems as if the Obama-affiliated VOD service was actually stunned that people objected.

Damn stretch to nuance Obama under this. What proof do you have? Present or the statement is conservative fake news! The quote above reminds me of the 2020 Family Research Council's Ralph Reed sending out voting "mailers" begging for donations from hopeful new donors based on Christian beliefs. As if Donald Trump believes in God (whom he won't ask for forgiveness or render an apology) or anyone other than himself. See what I did there—I stretched.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @1.2    one month ago

Are you defending Netflix over Cuties or denying Obama’s connection to the streaming service?  

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.2  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @1.2    one month ago
 
 
 
CB
1.2.3  CB   replied to  MAGA @1.2.1    one month ago

I'm sorry, but where do you acquire "Cuties" in my comment? 

Damn stretch to nuance Obama under this. What proof do you have?

NOTE: I have Netflix, but I am not interested in watching any "Cuties."

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.4  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @1.2.3    one month ago

The context of Netflix in the seeded article was regarding Cuties and the blowback against it and that Obama has ties to Netflix.  

 
 
 
CB
1.2.5  CB   replied to  MAGA @1.2.4    one month ago

I have "ties" to Netflix, and nobody asked me about making, airing, or reviewing the show you are concerned about. You just can't go around "indicting" people, MAGA. It loses you credibility. Fake news.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.6  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.5    one month ago

Being a subscriber can hardly be compared to the Obama's ties to Netflix.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.7  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.6    one month ago

Prove the ties. So far, you're just "puffing" Wait: Who is this?! —You AGAIN?!!!

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.8  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.7    one month ago

Please do at least try to keep up here, okay?

Here, since Google seems to be SUCH a challenge:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/business/media/obama-netflix-shows.html https://nypost.com/2019/08/27/netflix-is-now-a-propaganda-machine-for-the-obamas/

And yes, it is I. No need to start the 20 Questions game again.

Prove the ties. So far, you're just "puffing"— Wait: Who is this?! —You AGAIN?!!!

Done!

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.9  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.7    one month ago

Okay, I answered your questions--I "proved' it, so what now? What is your point for making me prove something a 15 second search on Google would have told you? Do you even have a point besides "Orange Man Bad"?

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2.10  Tessylo  replied to  MAGA @1.2.4    one month ago

What ties does President Obama have to Netflix other than this: 

  • The Obamas are headed to Netflix. The company announced Monday that the former first couple have signed a multiyear agreement to produce films and series for Netflix. The deal can include scripted and unscripted series, as well as documentaries and features. The content will be produced by Higher Ground Productions .
 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2.11  Tessylo  replied to  MAGA @1.2.4    one month ago

"The context of Netflix in the seeded article was regarding Cuties and the blowback against it and that Obama has ties to Netflix." 

What ties would those be?  And what do those ties have to do with Cuties on Netflix?

 
 
 
CB
1.2.12  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.8    one month ago

Please take your Obama Derangement Syndrome bashing away. What does the Obama's being successful in life have to do with MAGA's content on "Cuties"?

 
 
 
CB
1.2.13  CB   replied to  Tessylo @1.2.11    one month ago

I second that!

 
 
 
CB
1.2.14  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.9    one month ago

@1.2.12.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.15  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.12    one month ago
Please take your Obama Derangement Syndrome bashing away. What does the Obama's being successful in life have to do with MAGA's content on "Cuties"?

Please take your time and actually READ my comments before responding. That way, you'll KNOW next time that I didn't say anything at all bashing your dearly beloved Obama. Tell you what, why don't YOU prove that I bashed Obama, since you demanded proof from me and I provided it. Let's see if you are even willing to reciprocate. I am betting you won't and can't.

Go! Let's further the discussion, shall we?

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.16  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.14    one month ago
@ 1.2.12 .

Why? Why should I even bother?

Did you change it and make it correct now? I don't think so!

Anytime you want to quote me bashing Obama--as YOU CLAIMED I DID--I will be MORE than happy to read it. What you got?

 
 
 
CB
1.2.17  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.16    one month ago

Your linked article bashes the Obama's for achieving success apart from a successful eight years presidency. Perhaps you need to read your link materials before plying them to others. But, in any case:

th?id=OIP.YVe8g7vvjbWt2cE9R1WncQHaD4&w=187&h=100&c=8&rs=1&qlt=90&dpr=1.25&pid=3.1&rm=2

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.18  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.17    one month ago

Aw, gee, that is really too bad. I have noticed, as usual, you are bereft of any proof for YOUR statements, and magically ignore any requests while demanding it from others. One way street as always. You don't want to further discussions, you want to control them. Only like-minded thoughts to be heard, right? Don't want to burst that special little bubble, now do we?

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.19  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.17    one month ago
Your linked article bashes the Obama's for achieving success apart from a successful eight years presidency.

Well, that certainly proves you didn't read both links I provided you. You clearly did not read the NYT link, or you wouldn't have posted that rubbish.

I know you didn't read it and can prove it to you quite easily.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.20  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.18    one month ago

Well said.  You nailed it!  

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.21  Texan1211  replied to  MAGA @1.2.20    one month ago

Thanks.

What is really funny is he suggests that I read my links when it is OBVIOUS he didn't!

No sense engaging any further, as I don't travel one way streets often enough to indulge him.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.22  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.18    one month ago

Read your damn Washington Post link and get back to me. Or just talk to the hand!

It is not my responsibility to fix your blunder. You ran your links together like box-cars. Fix your BS.

All the same, the Washington Post article is a bash-fest so don't try to lecture me with bull-pucky.

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.2.23  dennis smith  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.18    one month ago

The lack of proof from some on the left is silencing. Asking them for it leads to deflection which they think is what proof is. 

 
 
 
CB
1.2.24  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.21    one month ago

And yet you are here interjecting yourself.  You can't quit me, apparently. Keep coming, I have more "doses" (drug of choice) available.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.25  CB   replied to  dennis smith @1.2.23    one month ago

Meh.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.26  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.22    one month ago
Read your damn Washington Post link and get back to me.

Oh. Wow. Please tell me where you read a link that I posted from the Washington Post. because MY links are clearly NOT from there. Here, I'll refresh your faulty memory for you:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/business/media/obama-netflix-shows.html https://nypost.com/2019/08/27/netflix-is-now-a-propaganda-machine-for-the-obamas/

Please do note that the Washington Post is NOT listed here. It is CLEARLY the New York Times and the New York Post. Not the Washington post. Please get it straight.

It is not my responsibility to fix your blunder .

What blunder? Forcing you into inventing a Washington Post link you merely IMAGINED???????????

You ran your links together like box-cars. Fix your BS.

Sounds like a personal problem to me. Do you need help in separating them? Do I NEED to do that so you don't confuse the WP with the NYT or NY Post?

All the same, Washington Post article is a bash-fest so don't try to lecture me with bull-pucky

Please, sir, if it isn't too much trouble for you, post the Washington Post article you keep going on and on about. At least a link, since you keep referring to it and I don't see it anywhere.

You know, if you want to truly further discussion. If   it all isn't just words to you.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.27  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.24    one month ago
And yet you are here interjecting yourself.  You can't quit me, apparently. Keep coming, I have more "doses" (drug of choice) available.

I highly recommend you lay off the hallucinogenics.

They are making you see Washington Post articles where none exist. 

be careful!

 
 
 
CB
1.2.28  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.26    one month ago

My mistake in the name obviously. You know damn well what I meant. The New York Post!  

"Box car" links together is confusing. Don't do it. Anyway, I can comment on the bashing New York Post article and I did! So now what?!

 
 
 
CB
1.2.29  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.27    one month ago

Fix your tired "box-car" links. And I will comment on whichever one or several I wish. It's my privilege. Got it.  Anyway, I am off this see-saw of yours. It's coffee-time for me anyway.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.30  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.28    one month ago
My mistake in the name obviously.

Yes, obviously. So obvious I am shocked you didn't catch it yourself before berating me for my "mistake".

You know damn well what I meant.

There are so many times I don't have a clue as to what you are posting about that I just now take you for the words YOU post. I don't try to suss out what you meant to say, I go by what you DO say.

"Box car" links together is confusing.

Apparently so, for some. I got it just fine.

Don't do it.

So now you seem to think you are the boss. LOL!

Anyway, I can comment on the bashing New York Post article and I did! So now what?!

Actually, (and it is pretty plain to see) you only referenced some Washington Post article and haven't commented on any others that I see.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.31  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.29    one month ago
Fix your tired "box-car" links.

To satisfy some whim of yours? I don't think so!

And I will comment on whichever one or several I wish. It's my privilege. Got it. 

Strawman argument. No one is telling you you can't post. Stop playing the martyr. You will garner no sympathy from me by playing one.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.32  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.30    one month ago

Growth and development; it's a 'thing.' We all should experiment with it.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.33  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.31    one month ago

Meh. And notably laughable.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.34  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.32    one month ago

Truth and honesty; it's a thing. We should all experiment with it.

You know, if we truly want to further the discussion, and not merely pay lip service to it.

That is, if you aren't too busy being amused and all.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.35  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.34    one month ago

I don't find you amusing, Texan. "Believe me."

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.2.36  dennis smith  replied to  CB @1.2.28    one month ago

How do you know someone else knows what you meant instead of what you said?

 
 
 
CB
1.2.37  CB   replied to  dennis smith @1.2.36    one month ago

"Washington Post" vs. New York Post? Give me a break. We're not a bunch of pre-teens here. Figure it out..

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.38  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.37    one month ago

So we aren't to take your posts seriously? We now have to try and figure out what you really mean, and just ignore your words?

HA!

I go by what is written. You should try that sometime.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.39  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.35    one month ago

imagine. if you will. my acute disappointment.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.40  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.39    one month ago

Okay, I am using my imagination. . . .(Sigh) I get old conservative stuff every time.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.41  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.40    one month ago

sounds bad, might want to get checked out!

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.42  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.40    one month ago

okay, now is that what you really meant to write?

just want to make sure!

 
 
 
CB
1.2.43  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.42    one month ago

Well so-called, "cultural warrior" are you here for the 'war'? What say you about "Cuties." Go on the record with something substantial.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.44  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.43    one month ago

let me think a while on what you really mean by that.

I'll get back to you!

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.45  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.43    one month ago

why are you calling me a cultural warrior?

 
 
 
CB
1.2.46  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.45    one month ago
The culture war is not some niche distraction for Bible thumpers and repressed weirdos channeling Chris Cooper in American Beauty . It is not an inconvenience to our GOP establishment and a frivolous distraction from the serious business of managing America’s decline to keep it at a slightly slower rate than under the Democrats. It is the battle over the things that we normal Americans live with every day. The nature of our country and society is vitally important, and we demand a say in it. Under Trump, we have that say again, finally, and in his second term look for Donald Trump’s administration to stay on the cultural offensive.

Please let you reply be about "Cuties" (or something in the article and not some tangent about protesting labels.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.2.47  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.38    one month ago

It’s all about feelings...

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.48  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.46    one month ago

meh 

 
 
 
Tessylo
1.2.49  Tessylo  replied to  CB @1.2.12    one month ago
"Please take your Obama Derangement Syndrome bashing away. What does the Obama's being successful in life have to do with MAGA's content on "Cuties"?"

Absolutely NOTHING

 
 
 
CB
1.2.50  CB   replied to  MAGA @1.2.47    one month ago

Spoken like an automaton, but you are not one. So, what are you trying to sell us on believing?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.2.51  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  dennis smith @1.2.23    one month ago
The lack of proof from some on the left is silencing.

Just to let any Russians bots or infiltrators out there know, who likely have a hard time with idioms, that should read "The lack of proof from some on the left is deafening". Of course, the premise is also total bullshit which is what one would expect from some foreign bot.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.52  CB   replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.51    one month ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.53  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.51    one month ago

You sure seem awfully informed on Russian bots.

Had much experience with them?

Cashed any checks from them?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.2.54  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.53    one month ago
Cashed any checks from them?

No, have you? Pretty strange for anyone to be defending them who wasn't.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.55  Texan1211  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.54    one month ago

see, there's the thing.

I didn't defend anyone, and I dare you to post a quote from me doing so.

if you accuse. you should be able to back your trifling nonsense up.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.56  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.55    one month ago

You didn't not defend Russia. —Yes, I did!

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.57  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.56    one month ago

I don't understand babble.

Go try to bamboozle someone else, or rephrase what you wrote so it might make sense.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.58  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.57    one month ago

Oh, I think you got it perfectly. And, I wouldn't take directions from you if you and I were the last people on NT.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.59  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.58    one month ago

I keep telling you, I am not fluent in gibberish.

THIS is gibberish:

   You didn'tnotdefend Russia. —Yes, I did!

I did not not defend Russia? That makes sense to you? Not to me!

And ----Yes, I did! makes even less sense.

Enjoy your day, I hope you find someone who is fluent in gibberish so you can have a nice conversation.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.60  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.59    one month ago

Two negatives make a positive. And yes, I interjected myself. But, continue on your way some-wheres, by all means. Here let me help (shutting the door).

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.2.61  Texan1211  replied to  CB @1.2.60    one month ago

th?id=OIP.O2cc4mTsUL-JJYDPPQ_bpwHaHa&w=209&h=209&c=8&rs=1&qlt=90&dpr=1.25&pid=3.1&rm=2

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  MAGA @1    one month ago

Does anyone here know anything about the far right white grievance crank named Kurt Schlicter ? you know, the guy who wrote the seeded article?  I do

Kurt Schlichter, a California trial lawyer and retired Army colonel, is a columnist at   Townhall   and fills in as a host on Hugh Hewitt’s nationally syndicated radio show. Schlichter has also written a series of books on a post-divorce America.

His self-published Kelly Turnbull series imagines a red state/blue state split, the latter now a progressive dystopia called the People’s Republic of North America, where whites have been impoverished and left homeless by reparations taxes.

The divorce is anything but amicable. It is a brutal race war. Most unsettling are the numerous parallels between the Turnbull series and  The Turner Diaries .

Both describe a tyrannical government that takes blacks off government assistance and gives them police powers, which they use to terrorize sympathetic white characters and seize their guns.

In   The Turner Diaries , the gun raid that opens the story is conducted by the “Northern Virginia Human Relations Council”, which has “deputized [blacks] in large numbers from the welfare Rolls”:

I opened the door, and four Negroes came pushing into the apartment before I could stop them. One was carrying a baseball bat, and two had long kitchen knives thrust into their belts. The one with the bat shoved me back into a corner and stood guard over me with his bat raised in a threatening position while the other three began ransacking my apartment.

In Schlichter’s books,   People’s Republic   and   Indian Country,   gun raids are also conducted by black former welfare recipients deputized into a police force whose slogan is “Diversity Is Our Strength.” Before a weapons seizure operation, an agent in one of Schlichter’s books declares “I’m gonna shoot me some redneck, ride their asses back here tied to my hood.”

The Turner Diaries   depicts an oppressive government cracking down on “racists, fascists and other anti-social elements.” Posters are displayed “urging citizens to ‘help fight racism’ by reporting suspicious persons to the political police.” In the first chapter of Schlichter’s   People’s Republic , a billboard commands “REPORT HATEMONGERS, DENIERS AND SPIES TO YOUR PEOPLE’S BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.”

Insurgents in   The Turner Diaries   use a truck-borne fertilizer bomb to attack FBI headquarters in Washington. In Schlichter’s   Indian Country , insurgents use a truck-borne fertilizer bomb to attack a military installation.

Even the names of the protagonists, Turner and Turnbull, are strikingly similar.

Beyond these obvious parallels, Schlichter’s books and   The Turner Diaries   share the same paranoia that progressive governments, aided by white collaborators, are empowering blacks to enable them to rape white women and ultimately exterminate the white race.

In   The Turner Diaries   a “Day of the Rope” is observed during which race traitors—politicians, businessmen, and journalists who supported the System—are summarily executed.

https://thebulwark.com/its-time-to-stop-talking-about-a-national-divorce/
 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1.3    one month ago

In his article here, Schlicter says 

Imagine having a Republican president conserva-woke enough to issue an executive order banning the poisonous lies of critical race theory from being inflicted upon our federal workforce. Well, wedohave a president fearless enough to fight back, boldly and publicly, against the noxious propaganda of the academic left we taxpayers have been shelling out millions to pay commie consultants for.

In his own writing elsewhere Schlicter all but calls for a race war and creates racist stereotypes of black characters. 

The entire premise of this seed is a sick joke. 

 
 
 
CB
1.3.2  CB   replied to  JohnRussell @1.3.1    one month ago

[Off topic no value]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.3.3  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1.3    one month ago

Since when is demonstrating that the author of a seed about race is a racist off topic? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.3.4  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1.3.1    one month ago

Since when is demonstrating that the author of a seed about race is a racist off topic? 

 
 
 
MAGA
1.3.5  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JohnRussell @1.3.4    one month ago

He’s not a racist. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  MAGA @1    one month ago
Oh, it occurs to them that normal people are disgusted and appalled, but this does not cause them to rethink their disgraceful actions but to insist we are somehow mischaracterizing what they are doing.

Please XX, tell me what is normal about the person who wrote the article you seeded? 

Can you do that? 

Vanderbrouk highlighted the  work of Kurt Schlichter , a well-known figure on the right despite his fringey extremism. Schlichter peddles white nationalist “replacement” theory, calls inner city residents of Chicago “savages,” and celebrates violence with obsessive regularity. Despite that, he remains a columnist at  Townhall  and fills in as a guest host on Hugh Hewitt’s nationally syndicated radio show. 

But it was a  series of books  written by Schlichter featuring “ white genocide paranoia and race war fantasy”  that Vanderbrouk found the most disturbing. Schlichter’s self-published Kelly Turnbull series, Vanderbrouk wrote “imagines a red state/blue state split, the latter now a progressive dystopia called the People’s Republic of North America, where whites have been impoverished and left homeless by reparations taxes.” In the books, Schlichter describes a brutal and hyper-violent “all out war.” In one book, his “ruthless” (his term) protagonist is “ sent back into the blue states to help those trapped inside resist a politically correct police state.” 

The body count of progressives, minorities, and even police officers is extraordinarily high. 

The obvious question is whether these turgid, overwrought books are simply harmless fiction. They are, after all, novels, not manifestos. But as Vanderbrouk notes, Schlichter makes clear that “he is not merely writing speculative fiction for entertainment. 

https://thebulwark.com/the-rights-continuing-glorification-of-violence/

 
 
 
CB
1.4.1  CB   replied to  JohnRussell @1.4    one month ago

Disgusting, stupid, bigoted people should be shunned. They have no value and nothing to offer the good people of this planet! They are not light, but foul darkness.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.4.2  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @1.4.1    one month ago

That’s why we shun the secular progressive left!  

 
 
 
CB
1.4.3  CB   replied to  MAGA @1.4.2    one month ago

Do you have any evidence that people who use critical thinking are racist? Present it. Examples even!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2  Vic Eldred    one month ago

I'm hoping that Mr Cruz might just be the next Justice appointed to the Supreme Court. That will help!

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    one month ago

Indeed it would.  The whole issue of this seed would be improved upon if he were to be on the court.  I’m sure the Gov. of Texas could pick a sufficiently conservative non establishment replacement for the Senate.  

 
 
 
CB
2.2  CB   replied to  Vic Eldred @2    one month ago
That’s why the executive order getting the government out of the racial grievance business is so important.

Enjoy it while it last, why don't you. Think that you will enjoy oppressing and suppressing the citizenry of this country under your authoritarian leader. Donald Trump has accomplished one significant thing, that is he has exposed a governing segment of republicans and conservatives who are ruthless and undeserving of an sympathy when the pendulum swings back in the other direction.  Yes! Donald and his small base of supporters have consumed nearly all the oxygen in the room-can burn out be approaching. Let's hope so.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.2.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @2.2    one month ago

Our President is a small government federalist in his approach to governing our country.  It is the progressive left that has fascist authoritarian tendencies on the issues, not Trump or his supporters.  

 
 
 
CB
2.2.2  CB   replied to  MAGA @2.2.1    one month ago

Untrue. Donald is a hodge-podge of putting the whole of the country under his control. If it was not so, it is highly likely that republicans and conservatives would be able to speak up and out about him without presidential commentary in all quarters. And he "models" after authoritarian leaders:

Trump told Woodward in a clip released on NBC's "Today."
  • "It's funny, the relationships I have, the tougher and meaner they are, the better I get along with them. You'll explain that to me someday, ok? But maybe it's not a bad thing. The easy ones I maybe don't like as much or don't get along with as much."
Woodward's response: "The president controls foreign relations unilaterally. He decides, and he has decided, oh, I'm going to get along with Putin, I'm going to get along with the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, MBS, and I'm going to try to get along with Kim Jong-un, the leader of North Korea."
  • "But not South Korea. He just smears South Korea time and time again in my interviews," Woodward continued. "He is the face of the United States to the world. And he has said, hey look, I get along with these bad guys but not the good guys."

Donald Trump is "whipping" Trump-RINOs into a mode for what he sees as his next four years (Heaven forbid!) should he retain office. Either you approve of this, or you are a willing participant in your own democracy's undoing. Either way, somebody will lose, if Donald does not go back into the private sector.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.2.3  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @2.2.2    one month ago
 
 
 
MAGA
2.2.4  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @2.2.2    one month ago

Then why were your political friends demanding that Trump impose one size fits all national lockdown orders instead of letting each governor meet the needs of their state and then with masks and a national mask mandate? Trump is a federalist not an authoritarian 

 
 
 
CB
2.2.5  CB   replied to  MAGA @2.2.3    one month ago

No more pics or memes. I won't look. Put them on 'screen' for all to see or forget about it.

 
 
 
CB
2.2.6  CB   replied to  MAGA @2.2.4    one month ago

There are exceptions to every rule. Stop with the nonsense. Nothing is absolute—not even democracy. I fully understand Donald plays at democracy and states rights too as a means to an end. It's all very Machiavellian. Donald Trump is an authoritarian-wannabe. End the denial—"See the Man"—While You Can Contain Him!

 
 
 
MAGA
2.2.7  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @2.2.6    one month ago

Ah, another orange man bad no matter what position he takes or what his governing stance is. It’s just wrong because it’s him, no matter what he says or does.  

 
 
 
CB
2.2.8  CB   replied to  MAGA @2.2.7    one month ago

Nonsense. Your deflection/deference to Texan is noted. However, he failed in connecting all the shows on Netflix (specifically "Cuties") to the Obamas. Gave them some free advertisement in the offing, nevertheless. I did not know of the Obama's project before this! Great for the Obamas. They have jobs galore!

 
 
 
dennis smith
2.2.9  dennis smith  replied to  MAGA @2.2.4    one month ago

Don't expect a coherent answer to that question.

 
 
 
CB
2.2.10  CB   replied to  dennis smith @2.2.9    one month ago

Meh.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.2.11  seeder  MAGA  replied to  dennis smith @2.2.9    one month ago

I don’t.  It’s way to much to ask of the progressive left 

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.12  Texan1211  replied to  CB @2.2.8    one month ago
Your deflection/deference to Texan is noted. However,hefailed in connecting all the shows on Netflix (specifically "Cuties") to the Obamas.

Still trying to bamboozle people, eh?

I never failed because I never tried. Get a grip, dude.

Can't quit me even when I am not involved, eh?

 
 
 
Texan1211
2.2.13  Texan1211  replied to  dennis smith @2.2.9    one month ago

Some don't answer questions, they like to play 20 questions.

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
2.2.14  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  CB @2.2.5    one month ago
No more pics or memes. I won't look. Put them on 'screen' for all to see or forget about it.

My precious boy, I'm surprised you look in the first place.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.3  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    one month ago

Notice that a secular progressive moderator censored my content above the seed that mirrored what the topic of the seeded article is all about.  Whenever you see that deleted we know it was right on and that they are abusing their power to content control personal opinion that opposes theirs.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
3  Dismayed Patriot    one month ago
"All this garbage the left has pushed on us – from racial self-loathing to gender idiocy to killing babies – has catastrophic real-world consequences on real people"

Who was forced to hate themselves, please come forward and raise your hand...

Who was forced to have an abortion, please come forward and raise their hand...

Who was forced to get gay married or was forced to be transgender, please come forward and raise their hand...

Well that's odd... No one is coming forward... But conservatives keep claiming they're being forced to do things they don't want to do... How could this be? They couldn't be fucking lying could they?... /s

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3    one month ago

It’s the secular progressive left that is destroying the moral fabric of our nation and lying about their true intentions.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
3.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  MAGA @3.1    one month ago
It’s the secular progressive left that is destroying the moral fabric of our nation

Sure, sure... It couldn't possibly be the serial adulterer with more than two dozen sexual assault accusation who cheated on all three of his wives, ran a fraudulent university, fraudulent charity, six companies into bankruptcy, has told over 30,000 lies since taking office, been impeached by the congress, is an un-indicted co-conspirator in a felony campaign finance case and President who chose to hide the truth from the American people about the seriousness of a pandemic that has now cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.

But it's the 'left' who is destroying the moral fabric of our nation. /s 

What a monumental crock of right wing conservative bullshit. Trump is the proof that the religious right have relinquished any and all moral superiority. They no longer represent the "moral fabric of our nation", most just represent the sniveling worthless piece of shit xenophobes and Islamophobes that make up a large portions of the right wing base.

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.2  Veronica  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.1    one month ago
religious right have relinquished any and all moral superiority.

So true.  

 
 
 
Raven Wing
3.1.3  Raven Wing  replied to  Veronica @3.1.2    one month ago
religious right have relinquished any and all moral superiority

Totally. Most of them are RINOs who preach religion to others, while they themselves are grossly immoral. '

The look on their faces when they are turned away at the Pearly Gates will likely be hilarious. Even more so when they are told their lies don't work there and directed to the 'Down' elevator.

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.4  Veronica  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1.3    one month ago
turned away at the Pearly Gates

It makes me so glad there is no gate to keep me out of my "heaven" in my belief system.  

I was actually thinking about it on my drive into work today.  How can some people claim to have the religious superiority and continue to support a man that not only broke their own commandments, but totally obliterated quite a few.  I just do not get it. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
3.1.5  Raven Wing  replied to  Veronica @3.1.4    one month ago
It makes me so glad there is no gate to keep me out of my "heaven" in my belief system.  

Same here. I practice the religion of my Cherokee ancestors, totally non-Christian related. Cherokee religion, like many other Native American Tribes, is Spirituality related.  This says it all...

384

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.6  Veronica  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1.5    one month ago

That is awesome & very very true.  Over the years I have learned to overcome 'hell on earth' and trudge on as best as possible.

Being Wiccan my heaven (as my BFF calls it - I hate to disagree with her, but sometimes it is better to just let things pass) is called Summerland.  It is what I make of it & I am never denied entry.  

I prefer to be a good person because it is right rather than try to be good because of a threat.  

 
 
 
Raven Wing
3.1.7  Raven Wing  replied to  Veronica @3.1.6    one month ago
I prefer to be a good person because it is right rather than try to be good because of a threat. 

I totally agree. I wish to be a good person to all people, not just to those who agree with me. There are more good people in the world than bad. And many of the bad have been brainwashed to be that way, either by their parents, environment, peers, or some religious cult that threatens their members with living in hell forever if they do not follow their teachings.

I believe that all humans of the planet are connected. We all share the world and all that Mother Earth and Father Sky provides for us. We all have our circle of life beliefs, and no one person is more valuable of important than another. Some just believe they are.

I do not judge anyone by their skin color, language, where they live, where they are from, or their religious beliefs. It is their decision as it is mine. What makes them happy in their own life, as long as they allow others to decide what makes them happy, allows for Harmony among the people, and that is how we can survive as a country, and as a people.

Wiccans and Native Americans are not that far apart in their Spirituality. Acceptance of our differences allows us to live in Harmony.

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.8  Veronica  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1.7    one month ago
What makes them happy in their own life, as long as they allow others to decide what makes them happy, allows for Harmony among the people, and that is how we can survive as a country, and as a people.

This is it, totally.  I follow the Power of 3 and the thought of "do as you will - harm none".  

 
 
 
Gordy327
3.1.9  Gordy327  replied to  MAGA @3.1    one month ago

Nothing like playing the blame game, eh?

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.10  Veronica  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1.5    one month ago

I finally found the one I was looking for... I keep putting them in different folders.....

256

"I do not exist to impress the world.

I exist to live my life in a way, that will make me Happy."

Richard Bach

 
 
 
Raven Wing
3.1.11  Raven Wing  replied to  Veronica @3.1.8    one month ago
I follow the Power of 3 and the thought of "do as you will - harm none". 

That is a very good thought. To Native Americans, Harmony is very very important, as without true Harmony within the Tribe it could adversely affect the stability of the Tribe, as well as their ability to survive as a whole. Thus, any complaints among the members of the Tribe are brought before the Council for resolution. The decision of the Council is final, and if either of the members cannot accept their decision they will have to leave the Tribe. No one is allowed to cause anything that will create disharmony within the Tribe. It is one of the Tribal laws that all members must follow in order to remain a member of the Tribe.

While there are very very rare where the Council's decision is not accepted and the member must leave. 

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
3.1.12  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1.3    one month ago
Totally. Most of them are RINOs who preach religion to others, while they themselves are grossly immoral.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
Raven Wing
3.1.13  Raven Wing  replied to  Veronica @3.1.10    one month ago

A very great way to look at life. Most everyone strives to be happy in their life. However, one person's strive to be happy should not in any way intrude on how others find their own happiness. Thus, no one has the right to dictate how others must live to match their own. 

Unfortunately, there are far too many people today that have little or no respect for the rights of others to live in a way that allows them to live in their own way to find their own peace and happiness. 

Happiness is not a 'one-size-fits-all' way of living, and everyone's idea of what makes them happy is different. It is the respect and acceptance of our differences that makes our nation, and people, strong.

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.14  Veronica  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1.13    one month ago
Happiness is not a 'one-size-fits-all' way of living, and everyone's idea of what makes them happy is different. 

So very true.  

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.15  seeder  MAGA  replied to  Veronica @3.1.2    one month ago

We relinquish nothing.  We defend morality and values.  

 
 
 
CB
3.1.16  CB   replied to  MAGA @3.1.15    one month ago

This nation's majority can not abide four more years of this extreme chaos. This nation can not be ruled by a Trump minority, it is time for the pendulum to swing back in the other direction. Donald Trump has no leadership ability; thus, the people grumble!

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.17  Veronica  replied to  MAGA @3.1.15    one month ago

Uh huh sure.  That is why you defend a man that committed adultery MULTIPLE times (he and the women should have been stoned), bears false witness on a daily basis (also a death sentence) as in ALL the 10 commandments are MORTAL sins, stolen from contractors that did work for him that he failed to pay for...........

But keep telling yourself you hold the moral high ground - I doubt many would believe you.

 
 
 
CB
3.1.18  CB   replied to  Veronica @3.1.17    one month ago

It is the workings of deceit send down from the Father of Lies. We are wise to that one's displays.

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.19  Veronica  replied to  CB @3.1.18    one month ago
Father of Lies

You talking Trump or Satan?

 
 
 
CB
3.1.20  CB   replied to  Veronica @3.1.19    one month ago

Send down from the Father of Lies (Satan) to one in the flock:  Trump. Moral-less and extremely transactional. Machiavellian.

 
 
 
Veronica
3.1.21  Veronica  replied to  CB @3.1.20    one month ago

Since I don't believe in Satan I would have to say that Trump lies all on his own.  

 
 
 
CB
3.1.22  CB   replied to  Veronica @3.1.21    one month ago

Machiavellian, then. (Chuckles.)

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.23  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @3.1.22    one month ago
 
 
 
CB
3.1.24  CB   replied to  MAGA @3.1.23    one month ago

Can't see it. No 'clicky.' So you want to post it for all to see?

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.25  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @3.1.24    one month ago

Teacher Trump And The 1776 Commission – Ben Garrison Cartoon

Ben Garrison September 18, 2020 1 Comment

Everyone gets an “A”,  A for America First! President Trump has announced he will sign an executive order to restore patriotic education to our schools. No one can deny that our education system is churning out students who can barely read or write. The one thing they are experts in is hating America and the Founding fathers. American history isn’t ...

https://www.conservativedailynews.com/category/trending-topics/political-cartoons/

 
 
 
CB
3.1.26  CB   replied to  MAGA @3.1.25    one month ago

We do not brain-wash ourselves to love this country blindly. That would be wrong on too many levels. Executive order  "patriots" from the group that swore they could legislate. All some of y'all can do is steal the rights and privileges from others. It is all some of you desire doing. Let's talk unalienable rights and white privileges .

EiT4F8vVgAAJmQC?format=jpg&name=medium

https://twitter.com/TBreassealeDHS/status/1307442577419894785/photo/1

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.27  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @3.1.26    one month ago

Nuclear Fallout – A.F. Branco Cartoon

A.F. Branco September 21, 2020 Leave a comment

05-bitten-li-1080-1200x630-300x160.jpg Folks are wondering if Democrats are regretting that they and Harry Reid ended the Senate judicial Filibuster. Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2020.
 
 
 
CB
3.1.28  CB   replied to  MAGA @3.1.27    one month ago

Republican and their alternative reality. One day when the weight of holding an alternative 'world' system together gets to be too much—the rest of us will be here for you in spite of ourselves.

 
 
 
CB
4  CB     one month ago
 People are furious with Netflix, and it seems as if the Obama-affiliated VOD service was actually stunned that people objected. After all, cultural decency rarely penetrates into the deep blue bubble, and the idea that telling someone “Hey, your perversion is not okay” is totally alien to their caste. The cultural critics adored Cuties and were scandalized that anyone might be offended by the horrific sexualization of pre-teen girls. Alyssa Rosenberg of the WaPo fumed: “ If conservatives, who have jumped on the debate over #Cuties , want to be taken seriously as cultural arbiters, they have to be able to talk about the *text* of a movie like this in an honest, responsible way. ” Well, if the price of the total rejection of pedo exploitation of kids is having people in blue metro enclaves not take us seriously, we’re ready to pay it.

I just watched the Beginning, partial middle, and ending of "Cuties." Do you know how the movie ends? What it's point is?

 
 
 
CB
4.1  CB   replied to  CB @4    one month ago

Comeback Maga, I am informed now. Let's discuss "Cuties."  Take the challenge. Clear the air!

 
 
 
CB
4.1.1  CB   replied to  CB @4.1    one month ago

CUTIES! Let's talk about it.

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.1    one month ago
Comeback Maga, I am informed now. Let's discuss "Cuties."  Take the challenge. Clear the air!

So your prior comments were when you were uninformed?

 
 
 
CB
4.1.3  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.2    one month ago

Meh.

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  CB @4.1.3    one month ago

hem

 
 
 
CB
5  CB     one month ago

Those of us who criticize "Cuties:" What is the thrust of this movie? Did you watch the film to its ending?  Did you passed judgement on it before or after watching its conclusion?

The movie is just what it tragically says it is:  A coming of age movie about young preteen girls, specifically focused on the behaviors of one conservative girl.

 
 
 
MAGA
5.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @5    one month ago

The whole concept of pre teen girls coming of age Is totally offensive and sickening to me. Its why we conservative Christians have engaged the enemy in the culture wars.  

 
 
 
CB
6  CB     one month ago

Your'e not in any culture war over preteens "coming of age" a stage where young people do more, achieve more, and understand more about themselves. That is, they begin and continue to make choices for themselves.

What conservatives are engaging in is attempting to "soap-opera" program youth to live a conservative life, in a manner similar to their own upbringing and yes, old age.

There is no culture war. Your article writer is a sham. Your so-called "culture war" on "Cuties" is an exploitation of the movie.

BTW, have you watched the movie through to its completion. If you have then tell me what the theme of this movie is! Please proceed. . . .

 
 
 
CB
6.1  CB   replied to  CB @6    one month ago

@6 is for MAGA.

 
 
 
MAGA
6.2  seeder  MAGA  replied to  CB @6    one month ago

There is no excuse for a movie showing pre teen girls doing that no matter the rationale for attempting to excuse it.  It’s wrong, period.  End of subject.  

 
 
 
CB
6.2.1  CB   replied to  MAGA @6.2    one month ago

Spare me your obvious display of hypocrisy. You support the most well-known "pussy-grabber" in the world for president. How many pre-teens on this planet, 'cut their teeth' on the concept from Donald's bus ride? And you dare to "model" his image here!!!!

Your lack of answering the question is a tell: You did not watch CUTIES or its conclusion. Weak.

 
 
 
JBB
7  JBB    one month ago

256

 
 
 
CB
7.1  CB   replied to  JBB @7    one month ago

The conservative Right is hung up on helping God (as if God needs any help). Actually, what they have done is booted out 99.99 percent of reasonable, principled republicans and conservatives while taking into their breast a wild, unprincipled, Machiavellian "confidence" man. 

Donald Trump is a con man. A confidence man. He never accepts no as any form of an answer. And, his bottom-line is selling. In this manner, if situations work out for the best—swell. If situations don't work as stated—that's how it goes, 'cuz'.

"Buyer beware."

Caveat Emptor

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online




Sean Treacy
Ronin2
Bob Nelson
cjcold
GregTx


35 visitors