Do Democrats Really Want to Celebrate the FBI's Heinous Abuses Against Mike Flynn?

  
Via:  Release The Kraken  •  5 months ago  •  66 comments

By:   Tyler O'Neil (pjmedia. com)

Do Democrats Really Want to Celebrate the FBI's Heinous Abuses Against Mike Flynn?
 

Sponsored by group The Donald on Newstalkers

The Donald on Newstalkers


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Tyler O'NeilMay 07, 2020 7:48 PM EST Share Tweet Email Comments Share Tweet fe4c268a-f0b4-45e7-ad3b-488cb205f768-730 AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

When the Department of Justice (DOJ) finally dropped the case against General Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser for President Donald Trump, House Democrats slammed the decision as a partisan attempt to "cover up" for Trump — presumably on Russia. While Flynn's attorney, Sidney Powell, presented evidence suggesting Flynn was "set up by corrupt agents" who threatened his son in order to pressure him into pleading guilty, Democrats insisted that the DOJ's decision to drop the case will "incriminate Bill Barr."

"Attorney General Barr's politicization of justice knows no bounds," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a statement. "Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators in the face of overwhelming evidence - but now, Attorney General Barr's Justice Department is dropping the case to continue to cover up for the President."

"Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about his illicit Russian contacts," Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) tweeted. "His lies do not now become truths. This dismissal does not exonerate him. But it does incriminate Bill Barr. In the worst politicization of the Justice Department in its history."


Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about his illicit Russian contacts.

His lies do not now become truths.

This dismissal does not exonerate him.

But it does incriminate Bill Barr.

In the worst politicization of the Justice Department in its history.

— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) May 7, 2020

"This is outrageous! Flynn PLEADED GUILTY to lying to investigators," Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) chimed in. "The evidence against him is overwhelming. Now, a politicized DOJ is dropping the case. The decision to overrule the special counsel is without precedent and warrants an immediate explanation."

Nadler insisted that he went easy on Bill Barr due to the coronavirus crisis, but now he will have to put his foot down because of this "outrageous" move. "Due to the ongoing COVID-19 emergency, I worked with DOJ to postpone our scheduled hearing with AG Barr as attentions and resources appropriately went to responding to the pandemic. But rest assured, we are going to reschedule that hearing, ASAP, and demand answers!" he added.


Due to the ongoing COVID-19 emergency, I worked with DOJ to postpone our scheduled hearing with AG Barr as attentions and resources appropriately went to responding to the pandemic. But rest assured, we are going to reschedule that hearing, ASAP, and demand answers! 2/2 https://t.co/OywQR41khM
— (((Rep. Nadler))) (@RepJerryNadler) May 7, 2020

All this pretend outrage is disgraceful because Flynn's exoneration represents the restoration of justice, not the perversion of it.

As Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University, put it, then-FBI Director James "Comey et al sought to create a crime in the absence of any evidence of criminal conduct. The case has now collapsed and represents one of the most ignoble moments for [former Special Counsel Robert] Mueller. The Justice Department did the right thing in seeking this dismissal. The new evidence not only undermined the legitimacy of the prosecution but the Justice Department itself. For those blinded by this age of rage, the abuse has been ignored and even defended."


The Justice Department did the right thing in seeking this dismissal. The new evidence not only undermined the legitimacy of the prosecution but the Justice Department itself. For those blinded by this age of rage, the abuse has been ignored and even defended.This is long overdue
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) May 7, 2020

Whatever Americans think about the Trump-Russia investigation, they should be able to acknowledge that Flynn was abused.

As National Review 's Andrew C. McCarthy, a former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, explained, Powell's evidence seemed to confirm not just that Flynn had been set up but that Mueller's staff had threatened to target his son unless he confessed to the false statements charge.

"As I've noted several times over the years, it has long been speculated that Flynn — though he did not believe he was guilty (and though the agents who interviewed him also did not believe he had intentionally misled them) — nevertheless pled guilty to false-statements charges because prosecutors from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's staff threatened him," McCarthy wrote. "Specifically, Flynn is said to have been warned that, if he refused to plead guilty, prosecutors would charge his son with a felony for failing to register with the Justice Department as a foreign agent. Such a so-called FARA violation (Foreign Agent Registration Act) is a crime that the DOJ almost never charged before the Mueller investigation, and it had dubious application to Flynn's son (who worked for Flynn's private-intelligence firm)."

"Well, Powell now contends that the new disclosures demonstrate that Mueller's prosecutors — she specifically cites Brandon Van Grack, who now runs Justice's FARA unit — did indeed promise Flynn that they would not charge his son if Flynn pled guilty. Worse, Powell avers that the prosecutors coerced Flynn and his counsel to keep this agreement secret. That is, this was to be a side deal that would not be written into the plea agreement and therefore would be kept from the court and the public," McCarthy added.

"Under federal law, all understandings that are relevant to a guilty plea must be disclosed to the judge . It would be not merely a serious ethical breach for government lawyers to fail to reveal such an arrangement. It would be a fraud on the court."

McCarthy also made the argument that the DOJ cited in dropping the case against Flynn. " There was no good-faith basis for an investigation of General Flynn . Under federal law, a false statement made to investigators is not actionable unless it is material . That means it must be pertinent to a matter that is properly under investigation," the former U.S. Attorney wrote. "If the FBI did not have a legitimate investigative basis to interview Flynn, then that fact should have been disclosed as exculpatory information. It would have enabled his counsel to argue that any inaccurate statements he made were immaterial."

Flynn pled guilty to making false statements in a January 24, 2017 interview about communications he had with Sergey Kislyak, then the Russian ambassador to the U.S., during the transition from President Obama to President Trump. It is entirely proper for an incoming national security adviser to meet with an ambassador, and the idea that these communications somehow violated the Logan Act — which forbids private interference in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy — is absurd.

Later revelations even suggested the FBI set a "perjury trap" for Flynn.

Do Democrats really want to defend the propriety of a prosecution that seemingly involved a perjury trap, proceeded on absurd pretenses, and allegedly procured a guilty plea by threatening a man's son with prosecution? Americans should remember their support for this in November.

Tyler O'Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center . Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

Trump's Response to DOJ Dropping the Case Against Flynn Is Spectacular


Share Tweet Tags: DemocratsMike Flynnnancy pelosiRussiagate


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
Release The Kraken
1  seeder  Release The Kraken    5 months ago

They really have no choice. The exposure over the last administration's corruption and treason represents every single democrat.

They lost an election and couldn't accept they chose the worst candidate in history.

They've learned nothing as 28 moonbats ran for the nomination and they decided on a corrupt rapist who has done absolutely nothing during his  political career except enrich his family and forcibly finger bang a woman and sniff dozens of minor children.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
1.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Release The Kraken @1    5 months ago
.... they decided on a corrupt rapist who has done absolutely nothing during his  political career except enrich his family and forcibly finger bang a woman and sniff dozens of minor children.

I'm shocked you are talking about Trump that way.

 
 
 
Ronin2
1.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1    5 months ago

Funny, they have Biden on video doing it; where is your video proof of Trump?

I will give Trump has used his political career to enrich his own family. Just like every other damn politician. It doesn't matter what letter they put behind their name, they all do it. Trump has been thoroughly investigated and called out for enriching his own family and businesses. But the Democrats are insisting no investigation of Biden is need for landing Hunter his well paying job; and taking actions to support the company his son took a lot of money from.

 
 
 
sixpick
1.2  sixpick  replied to  Release The Kraken @1    5 months ago

The bottom feeders had to get rid of Flynn, otherwise as National Security Advisor, the bottom feeders wouldn't have been able to continue their illegal investigation. 

The documents expose their objective and we have known for quite some time what they were doing, even before Obama, who was in the loop, left office.

He warned Trump about Flynn for obvious reasons.  He thought he could persuade him to not select Flynn as National Security Advisor solving their problem easily, but Trump was on to Obama from the very beginning and didn't take his advice.

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
1.2.1  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  sixpick @1.2    5 months ago
but Trump was on to Obama from the very beginning

admiral rogers flipped on obama and told trump what was going on.

that is why the trumps transition team moved out of trump towers after that meeting.


NSA Head Meets With Trump Team But Doesn't Give Obama A Heads Up

https://www.npr.org/2016/11/22/502980006/reports-suggest-nsa-director-mike-rogers-is-on-his-way-out

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
1.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Release The Kraken @1    5 months ago

Somehow, I cannot take anything "Shifty" Schiff and "No Nads" Nadler say seriously. Those two would sell their own mothers for the sake of political expediency!

 
 
 
MAGA
1.3.1  MAGA  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.3    5 months ago

There is no doubt that they would do that.  The NY and California duo even worse than Schumer and  Pelosi.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
2  Jeremy Retired in NC    5 months ago

It's mind boggling that these moronic half breeds cannot accept that even their own investigation didn't come up with anything.  They ignored evidence of their own corruption in their desire to unseat a duly elected president.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    5 months ago

Jeremy here is a hint. They are all corrupt. What I find shocking is that I can at least admit that, while others defend the corruption of the other team. No one has the high road here. 

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.1  JBB  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1    5 months ago

Are you okay with the racist "Half Breeds" slur?

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JBB @2.1.1    5 months ago

I actually had no idea what he is talking about when he said that. Do you?

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.3  JBB  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.2    5 months ago

Does it matter? In what context are racial slurs okay in your opinion?

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.4  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JBB @2.1.3    5 months ago

Well, racial slurs only matter if they are true and are directed to someone in particular, right? I mean if he called them mutts, they would not be dogs, would they? I am not trying to be obtuse. 

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.5  JBB  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.4    5 months ago

NONSENSE! He was not referring to dogs. It is a racial slur and you know It!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-breed

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/half-breed

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.6  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JBB @2.1.5    5 months ago

JBB,

Who there in the party is a half breed? It needs context. 

If he said it to me, that would be an insult. since I am White and Indian.

Do you see what I am trying to say?

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.7  JBB  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.6    5 months ago

SMH. He is referring to people like me who believe what Flynn did was inexcusable. I am part Native, too, and am offended you are defending it...

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.1.8  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JBB @2.1.7    5 months ago

Now I am smh. How is he referring to us when we were not in the discussion. And no I am not defending anything. I usually know when I am being insulted. It might have been a poor choice of words, but it is not applicable to anyone who he is describing. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
2.1.9  1stwarrior  replied to  JBB @2.1.1    5 months ago

WWOW - where in the world did you get that?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
2.1.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  1stwarrior @2.1.9    5 months ago

Three guesses and the first two don't count.............SMDH

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
2.1.12  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @2.1.5    5 months ago
He was not referring to dogs. 

You sure?  It is cute that you THINK you know what's going through my mind?  You don't know a goddamn thing about me aside from what I put here on NT.  For all you know I was referring to dogs.  But no.  You went childishly with the personal attack.

 
 
 
JBB
2.1.13  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.12    5 months ago

I saud what I said. You weren't referring to dogs!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
2.1.14  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.6    5 months ago

Perrie, JBB

I'll get this out there in plain simple English.  Nothing in my comment is directed at anybody's race or anything else that will trigger somebody.  A person't race, to me, is irrelevant.  The idea of treating people based on race is narrow minded and serves absolutely no purpose. 

You want clarification on something I say; ask me.  Don't go running off on some moronic rant that more than likely will be wrong like your idea that my mention of "half breed" is racist.  It's that simple.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
2.1.15  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @2.1.13    5 months ago

So you took what I said and ran with a moronic rant and personal attack without any kind of clarification.  See 2.1.14 .

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2.1.16  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.8    5 months ago
It might have been a poor choice of words, but it is not applicable to anyone who he is describing. 

On the other hand, the charge of "racism" is being made against someone who clearly did not make a racist remark. I think something needs to be done about it. It is a personal attack!  (The Coc!)

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1.17  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.16    5 months ago
It's mind boggling that these moronic half breeds cannot accept that even their own investigation didn't come up with anything. 

That is an odd way to describe government and law enforcement officials. 

Half-breed is a term, now considered derogatory, used to describe anyone who is of mixed race; although, in the United States, it usually refers to people who are half Native American and half European/white. 
wikipedia
 
 
 
sixpick
2.2  sixpick  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2    5 months ago

The only difference it would have made if anyone else had been elected, that person would have probably played ball with the other side, since most of them come from the same cloth and it's one stinking rag, let me tell you.

Trump is a real threat to Washington's corruptness.  They have driven themselves insane for fear of things just like this exposure of how dishonest the top tier of our government has been for so long.  Without Trump we would still be in the dark and Washington would still be making deals to enrich themselves and screwing us all along the way.

Trump is worth less today than he was the day he was elected, but look at the last President before him.  He promised "Hope and Change", but the only thing we got out of it was more wars than any other President since WWII, more illegals coming into this country to take our jobs, having a blind eye for all the corruption around him, not to mention spying on his Party's opponent and has spread the wealth around to fill both his pockets into the multi-millions.

And not to forget, framing an incoming National Security Advisor.

 
 
 
zuksam
2.2.2  zuksam  replied to  XDm9mm @2.2.1    5 months ago

He must be worth more than $12.2 million since he bought a $11.75 million Martha’s Vineyard estate. In 2017 they bought a 8.1 million house in DC.

 
 
 
sixpick
2.2.3  sixpick  replied to  zuksam @2.2.2    5 months ago

It's more like $80 million to $135 million between the two of them.  Both of them have very lucrative future income prospects.  Who knows or really cares? 

With their speaking engagements, merchandise, book deals and more, it won't take long before they reach that threshold of over a couple of hundred million they set for Romney and then he can tell them the same thing Obama told him, "I do think at a certain point, you've made enough money".

The Left are the same all over the world, "Do as I say, not as I do".

It's not going to mean anything for them or anyone else, if the seeds they planted come to fruition.

 
 
 
Tacos!
3  Tacos!    5 months ago

The ONLY reason these liars and hypocrites give a shit about Michael Flynn is because they think it can get them to Trump. Period. End of Story.

 
 
 
pat wilson
3.1  pat wilson  replied to  Tacos! @3    5 months ago

Most Americans believe in the rule of law, it doesn't make anyone a liar or hypocrite to state the obvious. We now have a useless Justice Department. The AG is firmly in the "POTUS" back pocket and our ship of state is listing hard !

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
3.1.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  pat wilson @3.1    5 months ago
The AG is firmly in the "POTUS" back pocket and our ship of state is listing hard !

I would have to agree with you there. It does matter who the AG is, doesn't it?

 
 
 
Raven Wing
3.1.2  Raven Wing  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @3.1.1    5 months ago
It does matter who the AG is, doesn't it?

Indeed it does. I have to wonder when America will get out country back. 

When will America become the country our world so desperately needs once again? 

[Removed

We can only regain America and what it stands for when the American people once again thinks for itself, and not simply be led like mindless sheep by those who are only after their own interests. 

 
 
 
sixpick
3.1.3  sixpick  replied to  Raven Wing @3.1.2    5 months ago

We need more people like this fellow, don't we?  He goes after a 33 year military leader who served this country, exonerated Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who lied about a Benghazi video and shuffled guns through Turkey, lied about it and destroyed evidence after it had been subpoenaed from an illegal server located in her residence to avoid government oversight.

Think about it.  Flynn lied.  Said he didn't talk to the Russian Ambassador about requesting Russia to not retaliate for the sanctions put on by Obama and only respond to the U.S. Sanctions in a reciprocal manner.

Kerry has been to Iran since Trump has been President.  What do you think they talked about, the grandchildren?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
3.1.4  1stwarrior  replied to  pat wilson @3.1    5 months ago

As was Lynch and Yates and . .. . . . .

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
3.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  sixpick @3.1.3    5 months ago

That's the thing, the FBI knew what Flynn had said and knew it was innocuous before they decided to interview him. The only reason they had to break protocol and interview him under false pretenses was for political advantage. 

Comey makes Hoover look like an honest director.

 
 
 
MAGA
3.1.6  MAGA  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.5    5 months ago

The regulars in the FBI were closing the case until the leadership took over and targeted Flynn.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.7  Vic Eldred  replied to  pat wilson @3.1    5 months ago

Why is it useless? Because it respects the rule of law?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @3.1.1    5 months ago
I would have to agree with you there.

You do?  Really?

 
 
 
JBB
3.2  JBB  replied to  Tacos! @3    5 months ago

Are you really okay with an Acting Director of National Security secretly being a paid agent of a foreign government? 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/us/politics/michael-flynn-turkey.html

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  JBB @3.2    5 months ago

how about the guy FRKN CONFESSED ALREADY,

.'

WTF   YET AGAIN

 
 
 
sixpick
3.2.2  sixpick  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.1    5 months ago

What would you do if the corrupt bottom feeders who had the authority to do whatever they wanted threatened to put your son in jail and throw away the keys unless you pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI?

FBI_Corruption1-600x193.jpg

They had to get rid of him.  He was a big obstacle in their illegal pursuit of investigating the President.  They knew Flynn would be poking around and realize what they were doing.  He had to go.

 
 
 
JBB
3.2.3  JBB  replied to  sixpick @3.2.2    5 months ago

Flymn's son was also illegally and secretly a paid undeclared foreign agent!

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  sixpick @3.2.2    5 months ago

Don't you find it funny how all of the whole Russia hoax thing is seemingly blowing up on the idiots who perpetrated it?

And the Kool-Aid drinkers are pissed off that someone is getting caught!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
3.2.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.4    5 months ago

And the Kool-Aid drinkers are pissed off that someone is getting caught!

says thev true kool aid konsumer.

Trumpo is so damn guilty of being Helped  by the Russians who Putin him in place it is pathetic clowns try and pass it off as a hoax.

199 indictments & multiple jail sentences do NOT  a hoax present, un\less one is Absent, of ANY damn critical thinking skill sets

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.2.6  Texan1211  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.5    5 months ago

Laughable nonsense.

Democrats and the media screamed about collusion for 2-3 years. Long years to have to listen to that cockamamie crap.

And then the Great Mueller was supposed to prove it for them.

But he didn't. Hell, Democrats didn't even use a damn thing from that Great Report to impeach Trump.

So excuse the hell out of me for being glad that some of the underhanded shit done  to Trump and anyone associated with him is being finally exposed.

The fucktards at the FBI went too far.

And now, they are being exposed for the crapweasels they are.

And if some folks get their panties in a wad defending the assholes, its even better.

 
 
 
sixpick
3.2.7  sixpick  replied to  JBB @3.2.3    5 months ago
Flymn's son was also illegally and secretly a paid undeclared foreign agent!

And so were many others.  Tony Podesta was one.  You know, John Podesta's brother.  You don't see him in jail do you?

Dozens race to register as foreign lobbyists since start of Mueller ...

https://www.latimes.com / politics / la-na-pol-foreign-lobbyi...
 
 
 
Tacos!
3.2.8  Tacos!  replied to  JBB @3.2    5 months ago

I don’t need to click on a link to a pointless story when I already know he wasn’t charged with anything having to do with your ridiculous allegation. But you would HAVE to change the subject or shout “Squirrel!” - like you are here - to avoid facing a horrendous truth that should make you want to vomit. I.e. the use of our justice department to destroy innocent people for political purposes. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
3.2.9  Tacos!  replied to  igknorantzrulz @3.2.1    5 months ago

Uh no. He entered a plea. That’s not a confession.

And even if it were, do you have any concept of how many bogus confessions there are?

 
 
 
sixpick
3.2.10  sixpick  replied to  Tacos! @3.2.9    5 months ago

You know, Tacos!

Mueller didn't do anything in my opinion.  He didn't even know what the heck was going on when he testified.  It was Weissman, the ass who got several people convicted on false premise years before.  I believe a couple of them actually died in prison and all of them were exonerated.  He's the vicious prosecutor, although Mueller was right there with him back then.  They, together ruin a few people's lives.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
3.2.11  1stwarrior  replied to  JBB @3.2.3    5 months ago

And you pulled that out of what part of your body?

 
 
 
Release The Kraken
3.2.12  seeder  Release The Kraken  replied to  1stwarrior @3.2.11    5 months ago

The psrtisan truth deniers are losing their minds as their tinkerbell fantasy Russian collusion coup attempt is exopsed for what it is, treason.

The reality is their favorite president betrayed his country and his minions are now peeking through their windows waiting for the swat team.

 
 
 
MAGA
3.2.13  MAGA  replied to  Release The Kraken @3.2.12    5 months ago

Hopefully their wait won’t be too long!  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.2.14  JohnRussell  replied to  sixpick @3.2.2    5 months ago
They had to get rid of him.  He was a big obstacle in their illegal pursuit of investigating the President.  They knew Flynn would be poking around and realize what they were doing.  He had to go.

There was no illegal pursuit of investigating Trump.  If investigating Trump was illegal, why did Robert Mueller do it for a year and a half in plain sight? 

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
3.2.15  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.14    5 months ago
 why did Robert Mueller do it for a year and a half in plain sight? 
  • mueller was backed by elected democrats who are corrupt beyond belief.

next question?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
3.2.16  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @3.2    5 months ago

when was he charged with that?

 
 
 
It Is ME
4  It Is ME    5 months ago

These years of President Trump have been great.

"Politics as usual" has been turned on it's head, with some..... personally being shown their own Colons for the first time. jrSmiley_68_smiley_image.png

It's SHOCKING....SHOCKING I tell ya ! jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
squiggy
5  squiggy    5 months ago

""This is outrageous! Flynn PLEADED GUILTY to lying to investigators," Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) chimed in."

Happens every day to people without the means to fight a malicious prosecutor.

 
 
 
bbl-1
6  bbl-1    5 months ago

Or-----do the 'dead conservatives' and the 'new GOP' want to celebrate Flynn's anti democratic, anti American actions?

 
 
 
MAGA
6.1  MAGA  replied to  bbl-1 @6    5 months ago

Flynn knows where all the skeletons of the Obama regime and deep state are buried and the democrats tried to take him out.  They have now failed and have been exposed.  

 
 
 
bbl-1
6.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  MAGA @6.1    5 months ago

Sorry.  Don't think Obama banged Daniels while his wife was home with a newborn.  Try again.

 
 
 
MAGA
6.1.2  MAGA  replied to  bbl-1 @6.1.1    5 months ago

Trump didn’t do that while he is President or during his Presidential campaign.  The deep state and Obama tried to take out our President 

 
 
 
Release The Kraken
6.1.3  seeder  Release The Kraken  replied to  MAGA @6.1.2    5 months ago

They are trying and failing.

Obama spied on the campaign to interfere in the election than committed treason to organize the post inaugural coup.

It happened, we all know it now. It's Obama's legacy, he betrayed his country.

 
 
 
MAGA
6.1.4  MAGA  replied to  Release The Kraken @6.1.3    5 months ago

Obama and The security portion of his administration literally attempted a bloodless coup against the incoming administration 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
6.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  MAGA @6.1.4    5 months ago

A few hours ago the President gave it a name - "Obamagate"

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


Release The Kraken
Dulay
Texan1211
Old Hermit
Tacos!
MonsterMash
Mark in Wyoming
Kavika


68 visitors