Surfs_Up

This Was Rigged - Ted Cruz LIGHTS UP FBI Over Wiretapping Donald Trump

  
By:  The Magic Eight Ball  •  Politics  •  6 months ago  •  30 comments

This Was Rigged - Ted Cruz LIGHTS UP FBI Over Wiretapping Donald Trump
This Wasn't Jason Borne - This Was Beavis and Butthead

If you want a preview into what Durham's criminal investigation will find this might help.

Don't wait for Horowitz to dispute anything said, because he doesn't.

Tags

jrBlog - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
The Magic Eight Ball
1  author  The Magic Eight Ball    6 months ago

The Timeline: 


  • Impeachment Hoax 
    Horowitz Testimony <--- YOU ARE HERE
    Senate Hearing 
    Durham 
    Justice 
    TRUMP2020 LANDSLIDE
 
 
 
Tessylo
2  Tessylo    6 months ago

So another whack pronouncement?

Nothing you've ever said ever comes true!

 
 
 
It Is ME
2.1  It Is ME  replied to  Tessylo @2    6 months ago
Nothing you've ever said ever comes true!

And your record is …………… ?

Stones and Glass Houses ! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
2.2  author  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  Tessylo @2    6 months ago
Nothing you've ever said ever comes true!

you said that in early 2017 when I told you this investigation would happen.

do try to keep up :)

 
 
 
Tessylo
3  Tessylo    6 months ago

Durham is a republicon hack.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
3.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @3    6 months ago
Durham is a republicon hack.

Interesting. That must be why Janet Reno (1999), Eric Holder (2009), and other high level Democrats appointed John Durham to important positions.

 
 
 
Tessylo
4  Tessylo    6 months ago

79000375_10215335575889258_5321549958183

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
4.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @4    6 months ago

Ackkkkkkkkkkkkkkk!!!!!! Pass the eye bleach.

 
 
 
Tessylo
5  Tessylo    6 months ago

79898217_1987098804768194_87494332104688

 
 
 
Greg Jones
7  Greg Jones    6 months ago

Wait, watch, and learn, Miss Tessy. No other outcome is possible

All attempts to derail the thread will fail

 
 
 
loki12
8  loki12    6 months ago

256

 
 
 
Tessylo
9  Tessylo    6 months ago

79934538_10220992625947618_3101012455531

 
 
 
Steve Ott
10  Steve Ott    6 months ago

How to shut down fake Republican outrage over 'spying' on Trump

the FBI submitted its first application to surveil Page a month after the Trump campaign cut ties with him. How would the FBI spy on a campaign if the person under surveillance is no longer a part of it? 

More importantly, following revelations that his travels  to Russia were under federal investigation , the Trump campaign swiftly distanced itself from Page. Trump’s communications director summed it all up quite well: “Mr. Page is not an advisor and has made no contribution to the campaign.” He went on to state that Page “has never been a part of our campaign. Period.”

Another Trump staffer said that Page had “no role” and that the campaign was “not aware of any of [Page’s] activities, past or present.” 

So, according to Trump’s own people, Page was an irrelevant player. That means that he did not communicate with high-level campaign staff (and certainly not with Trump himself), making Page worthless as a source of information about Trump or his campaign.

The republicans are nothing if not good story tellers. Would be nice if someone would tell a true story, not that I mind fantasy. I just don't like it in my politics.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
10.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Steve Ott @10    6 months ago
The republicans are nothing if not good story tellers. Would be nice if someone would tell a true story, not that I mind fantasy. I just don't like it in my politics.

Well, maybe you should have watched the Senate hearings with Horowitz.

Had you accomplished that, you would know that Horowitz indicated that the FBI undertook "illegal surveillance". 

During Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz admitted the FBI engaged in “illegal surveillance” of the 2016 Trump campaign.

When Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) asked Horowitz if the surveillance of Carter Page was unlawful, the IG said he’d “leave that decision to the courts.”

“Let’s put it this way,” Graham rephrased the question, “if you don’t have a legal foundation to surveil somebody and you keep doing it is that bad?”

“Absolutely,” Horowitz replied.

Graham asked, “Is that spying?”

“It’s illegal surveillance. It’s not court-authorized surveillance,” Horowitz explained.

Graham interrupted, saying, “Whatever illegal surveillance means, they did it. So, all this stuff that ‘they didn’t illegally surveil Trump’s campaign.’ They did.”

To most people that would indicate spying.  Especially when you consider this:

Surveillance

The concept of surveillance entails keeping continuous and close watch on an individual or group. It's a common dynamic security measure. Also, surveillance largely has legal authority regardles of the type of security cameras.

Surveillance might also involve consent. This depends on the area of concern and whether it is a public place, work place or a private space. It is good to know that surveillance can take place without a high level of technology. However, development of complex surveillance systems is known to facilitate surveillance. An example of such is a   remote security guard system . Great! Isn’t it?

Now, modern surveillance systems combine a wide variety of functionalities. These might include video recording, position sensing, imaging, tracking, metal detection and reporting. Businesses, government agencies, and residential homes now make use of these systems to keep surveillance over their assets. A good example is an IP video surveillance system.

Spying

Spying, on the other hand, deploys clandestine means to extract secret information. It is often without due authorization. Remember James Bond’s   “The Spy who loves me?”

Spying is a common practice of unscrupulous individuals and institutions. However, secret government agencies often take to spying for national interest reasons.

For instance, spies may be deployed to uncover the strategies of terrorist organizations in order to nail them. In addition, exposure of most spying activities often results in negative legal and political consequences.

Source:  https://blog.alphavs.com/difference-between-spying-and-surveillance

 
 
 
Steve Ott
10.1.1  Steve Ott  replied to  XDm9mm @10.1    6 months ago

So tell me this, how was surveillance on Page, ONE MONTH, after he left the campaign, surveillance on the campaign? Who else was being surveilled?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
10.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Steve Ott @10.1.1    6 months ago

you should read the report.

The FBI set up a meeting with the campaign using "security" as a pretext in order to spy on it. Plus the FBI used confidential human sources to speak with and record Papadapuolous, Page and an unnamed member of the campaign.

 
 
 
cjcold
10.1.3  cjcold  replied to  Sean Treacy @10.1.2    6 months ago

So you're complaining about the FBI doing their job?

Trump and his crew have always warranted investigation.

Trump has been a serial criminal and bully since he was a filthy rich kid that never learned morals.

Hanging out with the NY mafia growing up obviously had an influence. 

As soon as Trump is no longer president a whole shit-storm of legal troubles will be descending upon his head. He won't survive them.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
10.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  cjcold @10.1.3    6 months ago

Forging documents and withholding evidence in order to spy on an American citizen is the FBI's job? 

There used to be a time the left wing actually cared about civil liberties. I miss those days.

 
 
 
Ender
10.1.5  Ender  replied to  Sean Treacy @10.1.4    6 months ago

There also use to be a time when republicans saw a commie and red everywhere.

Now they are in bed with them.

 
 
 
cjcold
10.1.6  cjcold  replied to  Sean Treacy @10.1.4    6 months ago

A whole bunch of judges signed off on those FISA thingys. Only Trump owned propagandists say differently.

Trump is going down for his criminal activities.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
10.1.7  XDm9mm  replied to  cjcold @10.1.6    6 months ago
A whole bunch of judges signed off on those FISA thingys.

A whole bunch of lied to judges signed of on those.

Only Trump owned propagandists say differently.

Actually, Howorwitz, the man that actually investigated the situation says differently.

Trump is going down for his criminal activities.

Only in the wildest of your wet dreams.   The actual criminals involved, mostly in the upper echelons of the federal law enforcement and intelligence communities will be going down for THEIR criminal activities.  It won't be this week or next, but trust that the man who brought down the corruption in the Boston office of the FBI will bring down the corruption in the offices in Washington DC.  The truth works slowly but surely and with purpose.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
10.1.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  cjcold @10.1.6    6 months ago

The judges believed the fbi was being honest with them and not faking and withholding evidence.

why do you think that helps you? 

 
 
 
Steve Ott
10.1.9  Steve Ott  replied to  Sean Treacy @10.1.2    6 months ago

I did read the report. The fact remains, the surveillance was on Page, not the Campaign.

 
 
 
Ronin2
10.1.10  Ronin2  replied to  Steve Ott @10.1.9    6 months ago

You know what a Trojan Horse is?

Page was the conduit that the FBI used to spy on the Trump campaign. The FBI didn't just spy on Page, they spied on anyone associated with Page. You think 1 month separation from the Trump campaign stopped the FBI from wire tapping it? 

Horowitz admitted they did it. Why does the left find that impossible to comprehend?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
10.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Steve Ott @10    6 months ago
Would be nice if someone would tell a true story, not that I mind fantasy. I just don't like it in my politics.

You should probably read the report if you actually want facts, rather than parrot spin from a left wing pundit.

 
 
 
cjcold
10.2.1  cjcold  replied to  Sean Treacy @10.2    6 months ago

I've read many 'reports'. The vast majority say that Trump is a idiot childish criminal.

 
 
 
MUVA
10.2.2  MUVA  replied to  cjcold @10.2.1    6 months ago

What crimes?

 
 
 
Heartland American
10.2.3  Heartland American  replied to  MUVA @10.2.2    6 months ago

Winning the 2016 election against Hillary...

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
10.2.4  author  The Magic Eight Ball  replied to  cjcold @10.2.1    6 months ago
The vast majority say that Trump is a idiot childish criminal.

and you believed that also....  stop believing leftwing news. 

they are completely full of shit.