╌>

Woman's flesh-coloured leggings cause embarrassing optical illusion - and it looks indecent

  
Via:  Release The Kraken  •  6 years ago  •  78 comments


Woman's flesh-coloured leggings cause embarrassing optical illusion - and it looks indecent
 

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



We've all had a few fashion fails in our time - especially those of us who grew up wearing skirts over trousers in the 90s.

But few could say their photo has been seen by millions of people because their fashion faux pas made it look like they were naked in public.


This iframe is not allowed


A photograph of a woman doing her shopping has drawn attention for all the wrong reasons and she probably regrets pulling on her chosen outfit.

The picture, showing a woman standing in the aisle of a supermarket with a young girl sitting in the trolley, appears normal from her waist up.

But once you glance downwards it seems as though she's gone to the shop without any trousers - or underwear.

512

Then, as your eyes reach her feet, it's obvious the woman hasn't actually indecently exposed herself, but is wearing a particularly unfortunate shade of flesh-coloured leggings which produce an embarrassing optical illusion.

She's probably wishing she never put them on.

The image is thought to be several years old, taken in the USA, and has done a few rounds of the internet.

But after it was posted to   Facebook   by Reannon Allison on October 7 it has gone viral all over again.

The cringeworthy photo has racked up more than 60,000 shares and 11,000 comments in just a few weeks.

And Reannon has pointed out something new in the photograph that people hadn't spotted because they were distracted by the nude optical illusion.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2  Ed-NavDoc    6 years ago

Comical. Amazing that Facebook did not ban the photo for violating FB's bogus perceived community standards!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    6 years ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

I got nothing

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
3.1  Skrekk  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    6 years ago

I was at Walmart the other night and wondered about the brazen clothes some of the customers were wearing, and then I remembered it was Halloween.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
4  lady in black    6 years ago

Remember when this was the worst thing a woman could do when going out shopping:

“Curlers in your hair, shame on you!” to a stranger in the checkout line at the supermarket. Even though it was considered gauche to go out in public with rollers in your hair, many busy housewives simply tied a scarf around their head in an attempt to cover their rollers and went about their daily errands hoping that their hair would be dry in time for the evening.

Now anything goes, lol

 
 
 
Freefaller
Professor Quiet
5  Freefaller    6 years ago

Might be a little sexist here but I'd like to say that leggings should be a privilege that is earned

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Freefaller @5    6 years ago

Leggings are comfortable and can even work for women like me who tend to be a little hefty.

What I mean is.....I wear a loose fitting tunic that comes down over my butt and nearly to my knees. It looks good enough for office work.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Release The Kraken @5.1.1    6 years ago

Black is always good choice

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
5.1.6  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Release The Kraken @5.1.3    6 years ago

I used to prefer them until you posted that picture.  That is how I would have looked when I was at 240.  I am now 145 but leggings are not age appropriate for me outside of my house.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.9  Trout Giggles  replied to  Release The Kraken @5.1.3    6 years ago

Isn't this against the TOS????

MY EYES!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @5.1.6    6 years ago

I think it depends on what you wear with them

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
5.1.12  Paula Bartholomew  replied to    6 years ago

Trust me on this one. :)

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6  Ender    6 years ago

Haha  I have to comment on the choice of avatar at this time.

It looks like the fish is trying to get a better look.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ender @6    6 years ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

"What did I just see?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1    6 years ago

I am  glad it is a picture from behind if there must be a picture at all.  I just know she had a serious camel toe going on and I am out of eye bleach.

 
 
 
Uptownchick
Junior Silent
6.1.2  Uptownchick  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.1.1    6 years ago

6452b356a9050bfe481810b9b92657cd.jpg

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Uptownchick @6.1.2    6 years ago

Where can I order that? Bad Fish posted a photo of a large woman in animal print leggings and my eyes are scarred!

 
 
 
dave-2693993
Junior Quiet
7  dave-2693993    6 years ago

All I can say is:

bennyhill_wtf.png

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
8  Perrie Halpern R.A.    6 years ago

I think I met her at Walmart. 

 
 
 
TTGA
Professor Silent
8.3  TTGA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @8    6 years ago
I think I met her at Walmart.

Some years back I had to stand in line behind her or someone similar, but much broader in the beam.  She was wearing spandex.  There are some women who just should not wear spandex (darn, you took the barfing emoji away again and it expressed my gut feelings so well in this case) pun intended.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  TTGA @8.3    6 years ago

Let's protest until we get the puke emoji back!

WE WANT OUR PUKE!

WE WANT OUR PUKE!

WE WANT OUR PUKE!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.3.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Release The Kraken @8.3.2    6 years ago

Hey! I call no fair!

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
10  bbl-1    6 years ago

1.  A Trumpett on welfare with ATD child?

2.  Not a photo shot of Taylor Swift?

3.  Never mind.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
12  It Is ME    6 years ago

Mirror, Mirror on the wall.....STFU !

Honest ????????

512

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
13  MrFrost    6 years ago

800

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  MrFrost @13    6 years ago

Well....the Orca is a thing of natural beauty.....

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
13.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Release The Kraken @13.1.1    6 years ago

No comment

yer killing me

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Participates
13.1.3  Skrekk  replied to  Trout Giggles @13.1    6 years ago

That Orca needs a butt implant.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
13.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Release The Kraken @13.1.1    6 years ago

Just because Kanye is a big dick doesn't mean he has one.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
13.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  MrFrost @13    6 years ago

The whale wears it better.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
14  Kavika     6 years ago

When living in Missouri our neighbors pig, Miss Priscilla, was a model at Wally World...And thats'the truth!!!!

rouge%2Ba%2Blevre.jpg

 
 
 
dave-2693993
Junior Quiet
14.2  dave-2693993  replied to  Kavika @14    6 years ago

Got to ask, did Miss Priscilla watch Green Acres reruns to see Arnold Ziffel?

 
 
 
Uptownchick
Junior Silent
14.3  Uptownchick  replied to  Kavika @14    6 years ago

1t9jmf.jpg

 
 
 
Uptownchick
Junior Silent
14.3.2  Uptownchick  replied to  Release The Kraken @14.3.1    6 years ago

Oh come on now...that's never stopped you before! Close the door!

 
 

Who is online




Freefaller


124 visitors