I think the left in general is soft on terrorists.
I think the left was perfectly content to let Iran flaunt international sanctions, and were completely fine with Iran plotting and killing Americans.
No, we do NOT know for sure what will happen now.
But we DAMN SURE knew what would CONTINUE to happen if we chose to stand idly by while Americans were getting killed.
We ended the life of a lowlife scumbag.
It was richly deserved and LONG overdue.
WTF was he even DOING in Iraq? He was under a travel ban, so I guess we should have just pretended he didn't break that ban, hmm? Told him no again? Because THAT certainly was working, eh?
Iran also doesn't consider its attacks through proxies an act of war, so that must mean they are right about THAT, too, huh?
WTF was he doing in Iraq anyways? He was defying an international travel ban. too fucking bad he got killed, but I refuse to mourn for terrorist scumbags.
No, it's not. Look at news feeds of liberals saying that Trump "assassinated" the terrorist. You do not assassinate a terrorist. You take them out at first sight.
For instance, the far left wing loon Rose McGowan APOLOGIZED to Iran for taking out this terrorist.
Also, the speakers of the House, Illian Omar and AOC, tweeted that Trump ASSASSINATED the terrorist. She is in mourning for the loss to her.
They are not alone. Many other liberals agree with them.
No, it's not. Look at news feeds of liberals saying that Trump "assassinated" the terrorist. You do not assassinate a terrorist. You take them out at first sight.
No...they are in mourning. Just not saying it outright.
If libs really loved this country and cared about our military men and women, they would say that we should get behind President Trump and ensure Iran understands that the US will not stand for anymore of their antics, and will pay dearly if they tried any retaliation.
Instead, all we see are libs emboldening Iran by saying Trump escalated tension and calling the lawful takeout of a terrorist known for killing Americans and attacking American assets as an assassination.
Is the head of our Joint Chiefs of Staff on a terrorist watchlist, too?
Is he violating international travel bans? Is he plotting, planning, financing, and encouraging plots to kill Americans?
You can make all the excuses you want for the scumbucket, but I simply refuse to make any excuses for anything to do with the death of a known terrorist that was completely justified.
Still trying to change the subject of the article. Pathetic!
Another deflection. Yet another learned trump trait. Is the wall built yet? Is Hillary in jail yet? The do nothing party is alive and well and living in the Senate under Moscow Mitch's armpit.
Hahaha! You're so fuckin' right. How pathetic is that. How desperate is that. It's a crock that's funnier than shit! Goddam, that was fuckin' hilarious!
So I guess you think that if Iran kills the head of our Joint Chiefs of Staff,
If the Joint Chiefs was known and recognized internationally as a terrorist who arbitrarily killed soldiers and innocent civilians in other than countries, then, no. It won't be an act of war.
Yet another learned trump trait. Is the wall built yet? Is Hillary in jail yet? The do nothing party is alive and well and living in the Senate under Moscow Mitch's armpit.
Oh my God, Jizzerror. Somebody is deflecting from your seed. Where is your meme to point that out?
No, Obama only got the US involved in wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine. Let us not forget his 2 troop surges in Afghanistan along with his shitty SOFA agreement tying the US to a weak, corrupt Afghan government. Or the fact Obama sent US troops back into Iraq to rearm and retain Iraqi troops for a second time; and save a government that is loyal to Iran. Not to mention his extra judicial drone killing program across the ME; including 2 US citizens w/o trial.
Who's pathetic?
The f'ing Democrats that have removable backbones.
One second screaming at Trump for trying to withdraw troops from Syria; so now they are still there in the middle of harms way. The next screaming that Trump didn't consult their corrupt, seditious, leaking asses about killing a known terrorist that has killed thousands, including US forces and personnel, and was openly plotting more attacks in Iraq and Syria.
Of course had not Trump acted the Democrat neocons and chicken hawks would have blasted Trump for ignoring Iranian terrorist activities.
But Trruuummmmppppp!!!!!!
Who's pathetic?
The moronic left that seem to think this won't all come back to bite them in their collective asses the next time a Democrat holds the White House.
I have been called Tex and Miss plenty of times without anyone getting a ticket!guess it just depends, huh?
Yes, it depends on whether it's done for the purpose of mocking.
Do you think that Tex is mocking of your screen name Tex? Have you told other members that you feel mocked when they call you Tex? Have you flagged those comments? I for one should have had dozens of tickets.
I can't see how you'd think that Miss is a mockery of your screen name but same questions.
If you want hypocrisy, which is what your video suggests, go back to 1999 and look at the videos of Schiff, Nadler, Schumer and Pelosi during the Clinton impeachment.
Seems like they feel none of that happened 20 years later.
You are too easy. [deleted] wants us to admit that Trump is a hypocrite. So maybe he is by his past tweets.
Of course, libs will never admit the same, especially by a few choice lib/prog/dems during the Clinton impeachment. Seems amnesia is the condition of order these days for prog/libs.
Of course, libs will never admit the same, especially by a few choice lib/prog/dems during the Clinton impeachment. Seems amnesia is the condition of order these days for prog/libs.
You inability to address Trump's hypocrisy without spewing whataboutism is noted, as is your failure to answer my question.
Never one for logic. You don't agree with the subject matter; you don't agree with the commenters; you're not a member of this group; you have added nothing even close to intellectual intercourse ... and you're telling others to leave? Does that even make sense?
It seems no one on the right is addressing the hypocrisy issue. trump is the king of hypocrisy.
All hypocrites have one thing in common: they're offended by the truth. Everyone hypocrite here doesn't have an ounce of self-respect or honor. President Obama ended the life of osama bin laden and trump can't even acknowledge that.
And I would worry about anyone who has loved ones being sent to the mideast. Given that trumplethinskin has told the world that he doesn't like people who were captured, I'm loathe to think that any Americans captured will be thought of as fodder for torture since the Traitor-In-Chief wouldn't like them enough to send reinforcements for rescue. He doesn't like people who are captured. And the five time deferment coward has stated that on the world stage.
I don't give a shit what any right leaner has to say. I don't put any weight whatsoever to those who don't have any pride, any dignity, any self-esteem. They would rightfully be outraged if President Obama would have done 1/100th of the shit that trump has done. I would have too. But those supporters are disgusting. There's a trump derangement syndrome alright. But it's the right.
Yes, there is a bit of hypocrisy there, but I don't remember you being upset about all of the comments Schiff, Scumer, Pelosi and no nads Nadler made during the Clinton impeachment, but seemed to have forgotten about those comments 20 years later.
If you consider our response to getting attacked an act of war, so be it.
If that makes Trump hypocritical to you, who gives a damn? Sue him, or better yet, get Nancy to impeach him.
What Trump did was justified and long overdue. Whether you accept that or not doesn't matter. The man was a fucking TERRORIST. Get it yet? A TERRORIST!
People criticizing Trump for an 8+year old video or tweet are simply engaging in political flim-flam, and refuse to recognize facts.
What Trump did was justified and long overdue. Whether you accept that or not doesn't matter. The man was a fucking TERRORIST. Get it yet? A TERRORIST!
He was the second most important government official in Iran.
He was the second most important government official in Iran.
I don't care if he was the Grand Poobah. He was a terrorist first and foremost, responsible for hordes of American deaths, in clear violation of international travel bans and got exactly what he deserved.
Get it?
Yeah, I get it .
Bad Man Dead.
Right on!
I won't apologize for a President doing exactly what I and many others would have done. Ignoring terrorists doesn't make them go away, it only emboldens them.
Because the timing didn't suit you and you simply detest the man who issued the orders isn't my concern.
Gee, I consider it an act of war when Americans are attacked and killed. I have no regrets for responding and saving lives.
Yes, there will be retaliation. That is what this was--retaliation to a known terrorist responsible for American deaths. I won't apologize for him getting what was due.
No one knows for sure what Iran's response will be.
WE DO know, however, what actions they have undertaken in the last 20 or so years, actions resulting in American deaths.
And it will continue to happen if we simply ignore it as we have done.
The head of the international organization charged with monitoring Iran’s compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal said Iran is meeting its obligations under the accord and warned against states trying to influence verification activities. Less than three weeks later, the United States imposed sanctions against Iranian officials and institutions that Washington alleges are working to retain nuclear weapons-related expertise in Iran.
IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano cautioned in March that some nations' efforts to micromanage the nuclear agency's monitoring of Iran would threaten the credibility of its findings. (Photo: Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images)
“Iran is implementing its nuclear commitments,” said Yukiya Amano, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in March 4 remarks to the agency’s Board of Governors. Amano urged Tehran to continue adhering to the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
I do hope we can de-escalate this shit and avoid losing more lives.
Of course, so do I, but if Iran does retaliate and kills more Americans, do we take the route the left prefers and sit back, do nothing, and just hope they will go away. That has been their point of view for 40 years.
Iran to restart some nuclear activity in response to U.S. withdrawal from nuclear deal
GENEVA (Reuters) - Iran will restart part of its halted nuclear program in response to the U.S. withdrawal from a landmark 2015 nuclear deal but does not itself plan to pull out of the agreement, the state-run IRIB news agency reported on Monday.
Here what they say now after the killing of Soleimani:
Blowback: Iran abandons nuclear limits after US killing
By NASSER KARIMI , JON GAMBRELL and ZEINA KARAM Associated Press
JANUARY 5, 2020 — 11:59PM
TEHRAN, Iran — The blowback over the U.S. killing of a top Iranian general mounted Sunday as Iran announced it will no longer abide by the limits contained in the 2015 nuclear deal and Iraq's Parliament called for the expulsion of all American troops from Iraqi soil.
Blowback: Iran abandons nuclear limits after US killing
Iran was so in-compliance with the "Non-Binding" agreement by Obama and Crew (According to an inspector), it only took them a day or two to get things back on track again ?
What are the "Other" countries that signed-on and Praised this "Non-Binding" agreement, doing about Iran's …… "Threat" ?
The head of the international organization charged with monitoring Iran’s compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal said Iran is meeting its obligations under the accord and warned against states trying to influence verification activities. Less than three weeks later, the United States imposed sanctions against Iranian officials and institutions that Washington alleges are working to retain nuclear weapons-related expertise in Iran.
IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano cautioned in March that some nations' efforts to micromanage the nuclear agency's monitoring of Iran would threaten the credibility of its findings. (Photo: Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images)
“Iran is implementing its nuclear commitments,” said Yukiya Amano, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in March 4 remarks to the agency’s Board of Governors. Amano urged Tehran to continue adhering to the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
This little link in the "Opinion Piece" (as you note it is)....is a fun read:
Institute for Science and International Security
Analysis of the IAEA’s Seventh Iran Nuclear Deal Report: Still Little Detail and Potential Verification Problems by David Albright and Andrea Stricker - September 1, 2017
This ones a Hoot too:
U.S. pressure or not, U.N. nuclear watchdog sees no need to check Iran military sites
Soooooo….the 2019 summary by the IAEA inspector, should make one wonder if they actually did their job to it's "Fullest" extent.
Is anyone? I'm never impressed by those who come into an article just to make ridiculous statements. I will never understand the mindset of someone who knows they don't agree with an article and author, who refuse to engage to intellectual intercourse, who refuse to offer something of substance, etc.
At times the word is incorrectly used to refer to anyone with controversial, or differing, opinions. Such usage goes against the ordinary meaning of troll in multiple ways. While psychologists have determined that the dark triad traits are common among Internet trolls, some observers claim trolls don't actually believe the controversial views they claim. Researcher Ben Radford wrote about the phenomenon of clowns in history and modern day in his book Bad Clowns and found that bad clowns have evolved into Internet trolls. They do not dress up as traditional clowns but, for their own amusement, they tease and exploit "human foibles" in order to speak the "truth" and gain a reaction. Like clowns in make-up, Internet trolls hide behind "anonymous accounts and fake usernames." In their eyes they are the trickster and are performing for a nameless audience via the Internet.
Researcher Ben Radford wrote about the phenomenon of clowns in history and modern day in his book Bad Clowns and found that bad clowns have evolved into Internet trolls.
So your preference is for appeasement, AKA sucking iranian crank.
This may surprise the fuck out of you but in the real world, not everything is black or white. Intelligent people recognize that interaction requires nuance.
I already knew that of course but it's better that you admit it.
Based on your comment, you don't know what you don't know.
Plus, we can now legitimately classify obummer as one of the world's foremost islamic terrorists by proxy.
So you're another vote for obummer sucking iranian crank. No surprise there. Gotta wonder about why someone would support the world's foremost islamic terrorist though.
Take your strawmen to someone who plays that game FW.
Go ahead and explain why so many Dems are so ready and willing to support an insane regime in Iran. Apparently more so then almost half of the population there.
I'm building an "I don't give a damn" in an attempt to prevent the bullshit that's being spewed on this thread from contaminating the computers that belong to the intelligent people using NewsTalkers. I hope your computer isn't affected by all of the right-wing shit.
The evidence here is overwhelmingly prima facie and the idea that you would attack somebody who supports US opposition to a manical despotic Iranian regime is further advancement of that.
Actually, there isn't FW. There is NO evidence that I attack anyone, there is plenty of evidence that I call out COMMENTS.
The mere idea that you label such opposition as insane defines the above referenced remarks.
Where did I do that FW?
Again, save your strawmen for those who play that game.
It is clear to everyone that some radical leftists are willing to sacrifice American lives in pursuit of their fascistic ideology at home.
Ditto for the radical alt right. Point?
Iran not unlike NK is a virtual prison to those opposed to the regime there. In contrast, those who here are welcome to make their full support by way of their relocation to that region.
It's hypocritical to question whether in the future, members will admit they were wrong and ignore the fact that Trump has never admitted he was wrong.
Obama didn't launch a strike on Iran OR any of their leadership. Nor did he threaten to attack their cultural centers.
So why are you (and others) here? You have nothing of substance to add, you want to bob and weave while leaving midget comments, your typical land on an article and leave troll shit in the aisles, just to say you did something that served no purpose.
Not one comment of substance. Sad. Deplorably, deplorably sad. For you. Because I enjoy the shit out of it.
Sorry, but every one of my comments have substance. Anytime the stupidity of the ideology of liberalism is pointed out, and it is regularly, there is much substance to be had.
'Sorry, but every one of my comments have substance. Anytime the stupidity of the ideology of liberalism is pointed out, and it is regularly, there is much substance to be had. Just because you can't deal with it...'
The impotence of tRump and his supporters is so appalling.
As usual, you don't see the bigger picture. It would mean any foreign country. Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq. No matter the country, the intent is what's at stake. The intent was to start a war, or show an act of aggression, in order to get reelected. Think about it, Texan. Or is Sunday a day of rest for intellect?
We are enjoying seeing your rabid support of trump. I love seeing it. See, there are two types of trump supporters. There are those that sincerely thought he could bring about change. They hoped he would take the job seriously. And they admit they have made some mistakes. Then there are those who are either thinly veiled racists or those that love seeing some guy want to fuck his daughter.
We have been through this already. Let me repost it for you again.Maybe you missed it...
No...they are in mourning. Just not saying it outright.
If libs really loved this country and cared about our military men and women, they would say that we should get behind President Trump and ensure Iran understands that the US will not stand for anymore of their antics, and will pay dearly if they tried any retaliation.
Instead, all we see are libs emboldening Iran by saying Trump escalated tension and calling the lawful takeout of a terrorist known for killing Americans and attacking American assets as an assassination.
That is sedition and giving our enemy comfort.
Liberals are in mourning because this guy will no longer be responsible for American deaths that liberals can blame Trump for.
Instead, all we see are libs emboldening Iran by saying Trump escalated tension and calling the lawful takeout of a terrorist known for killing Americans and attacking American assets as an assassination.
No...they are in mourning. Just not saying it outright.
So no liberals have said they're mourning Soleimani butt you are pretending they're mourning him anyway.
That is sedition and giving our enemy comfort.Liberals are in mourning because this guy will no longer be responsible for American deaths that liberals can blame Trump for.
Wow! That is one of the dumbest statements posted in this thread.
I stand by my statement. They are in mourning, just not saying it outright.
Along with that, they are celebrating because it gives them yet another reason to blame Trump if Iran retaliates.
They then will freak out when Trump attacks back.
I just don't understand why the left is so adamant about protecting a terrorist after it is well documented he is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American soldiers.
It is a bad case of "he is a bad guy, and should be taken out, but the wrong guy took him out".
Unfortunately, the left wing media speaks for itself. Also the Hollywood idiots and many of those on here. They can't wait for an Iranian strike that will kill Americans so they can blame Trump. No matter that Iran has been killing Americans for decades.
Unfortunately, the left wing media speaks for itself. Also the Hollywood idiots and many of those on here. They can't wait for an Iranian strike that will kill Americans so they can blame Trump.
Okay. If that bullshit is what "left wing media" says and "many of those on here" are saying that shit, please post a quotation to back up that fucking lie.
In the video Trump did not accuse Obama of attacking Iran. Obama never said he would attack Iran. Trump made that shit up.
Nobody said Trump has attacked Iran. Butt Trump killed the head of Iran's military and has been rattling his saber ever since.
Trump has threatened to bomb Iran (including their "cultural sites" which is a war crime).
Iran vows revenge as Trump threatens Iraq with sanctions
UPDATED ON: JANUARY 6, 2020 / 10:51 AM / CBS NEWS
What you need to know
Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran's elite Quds military force and one of the most powerful figures in the Islamic Republic, was killed early Friday in an airstrike in Baghdad. Thousands of people have mourned him in both Iraq and Iran.
The Iranian government says it will no longer abide by key terms of the 2015 nuclear deal, lifting restrictions on centrifuges, uranium enrichment and more. President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the deal in 2018.
The Iraqi Parliament approved a resolution calling on the government to expel some 5,000 U.S. troops from the country. President Trump said "we are not leaving unless they pay us back" for an air base in Iraq.
Mr. Trump says his administration "may discuss" releasing the intelligence that led to the strike on Soleimani.
Mr. Trump tweeted Saturday that the U.S. would target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliates for the strike.
The White House sent a formal notification to Congress about the airstrike as required by the War Powers Act.
Lawmakers are divided over the strike, with Republicans applauding Mr. Trump's action and Democrats warning about the possible repercussions.
Obama got Iran to sign the JCPOA. Trump shredded that agreement.
From Wikipedia: Under JCPOA, Iran agreed to eliminate its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium, cut its stockpile of low-enriched uranium by 98%, and reduce by about two-thirds the number of its gas centrifuges for 13 years. For the next 15 years Iran will only enrich uranium up to 3.67
The UN nuclear monitoring agency says Iran continues to comply with a landmark 2015 nuclear deal, although its stockpiles of low-enriched uranium and heavy water are growing.
The finding by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is included in its latest quarterly report distributed to member states.
In its report on May 31, the agency said the IAEA found Iran had stayed within key limitations spelled out in the agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA.
(including their "cultural sites" which is a war crime).
He loves American war criminals. Hell, the people who come here because they feel they kick the dust up are entertainingly pathetic. Can't stay on other's like minded seeds, but they come here spouting the most ridiculous rhetoric. Love, love, love it!
Sigh....I understand most on the left is accustomed to being wrong, so this may come as a surprise to you...
this was today
Now, in the first frame of the video, it shows 23 people, give or take 1. In my original post, I stated there were 12. Another site updated the number at 1pm and said 10 more people showed. That put the number to 22.
Well, I guess the topic of this article (hypocrisy) eludes even the seeder.
i once veered off topic,
.
/.
/.
.
and lost my freight trane of thought,
so i cried
crocodile tears for hippos critical of my thought process or, cause i thought it would be food for thought
processing, till i remembered,
i don't have a food for thought processor, or even a process, to attempt to digest all the crap flung around here, like it was a prime example of the baboon section of the primate section of the safari, where crap is freely flung
like a flying nun,
in a silly sally field outfitted with a left of center right fielders choice, not chosen to be found in the section frozen, like a vegetable
Who is it that struck Iran "just before the election"?
As the Trumpsters will be quick to yammer about, Trump hasn't actually struck Iran (yet).
Right now Trump is merely on the warm up lap.
Sure, he's doing everything he can to provoke a war with Iran, like killing their top general and threatening to bomb 52 sites in Iran, butt it's not quite close enough to the election to actually start the war.
He loves to talk shit though and he's stirring the pot by threatening to commit war crimes. Butt, the Bone-Spur-inChief has to act tough for his twit wits for awhile to get them whipped up into crazed mob before he attacks.
Torches and pitchforks will go on sale soon at all Trump locations. They're the perfect gift for the crazy MFers in your family.
Who's pathetic?
TRUMP!
Are you mad that we took out a leading terrorist?
Should we have left him alone, free to continue planning, plotting, orchestrating and financing plots resulting in American deaths?
THAT is a reasonable alternative to you?
you don't find Trumps own words, when used against him, a least a little bit interesting...? OF COURSE YOU DON"T
cause just like Trump, U R A Hippocritter
That's not the topic of this article. As you know, I discussed that elsewhere.
Please read my article that's about your deflection: The Impact Of Killing Qassem Suleimani
What do you think of the video clip (the actual topic here).
I think the left in general is soft on terrorists.
I think the left was perfectly content to let Iran flaunt international sanctions, and were completely fine with Iran plotting and killing Americans.
No, we do NOT know for sure what will happen now.
But we DAMN SURE knew what would CONTINUE to happen if we chose to stand idly by while Americans were getting killed.
We ended the life of a lowlife scumbag.
It was richly deserved and LONG overdue.
WTF was he even DOING in Iraq? He was under a travel ban, so I guess we should have just pretended he didn't break that ban, hmm? Told him no again? Because THAT certainly was working, eh?
That's just another stupid fucking deflection.
It has nothing to do with the topic of this article.
Care to comment on the video (the topic of this video)?
He's incapable of addressing Trump's actions and words without defection and strawmen.
You claim it is hypocrisy.
But Trump hasn't started any war with Iran. so WTF are you going on and on and on about now?
Iran said it was an act of war.
Oh, well then, that must settle it!
/s
Iran also doesn't consider its attacks through proxies an act of war, so that must mean they are right about THAT, too, huh?
WTF was he doing in Iraq anyways? He was defying an international travel ban. too fucking bad he got killed, but I refuse to mourn for terrorist scumbags.
I'll leave that for others.
Bunch of right leaning paper tigers.
Some trump supporters are the most irrelevant people alive. Hypocrites, liars, deflectors, shadow boxers, and totally irrelevant.
Don't be so sure....
(Let's see what happens now ...)
Why are you attempting to get someone else to violate the CoC?
(Interesting tactic...though it strikes me as being more than a bit sleazy...)
Perrie has said that tactic is a CoC violation.
that's a CoC violation and you know it. The next time you say that in S&B I'm deleting your comment because it's trolling
Reads to me, like they are stating the obvious.
He's trying to bait someone into committing a CoC violation.
He's a master baiter.
aren't we all...
What we do is spelled differently.
If you thought that the comment was skirting the CoC, you would have flagged it instead of whining about it.
The right-wingers who refuse to discuss the video (the topic of this article).
You know, people like you.
You still can't discuss Trump's hypocrisy can you?
Oh I get it now. You don't understand the paper tiger reference.
Here's a hint; It has nothing to do with being irrelevant.
Or much of anything else.
[deleted]
Still trying to change the subject of the article. Pathetic!
That's total fucking bullshit and just another deflection.
Care to comment on the video (the topic of this article)?
Your memes make no sense.
The liberal mantra is accuse others of what you yourself is guilty of.
You do it well.
Good job..
Trump didn't attack Iran, so WTF is this shit about hypocrisy?
Wait--do you think he DID attack Iran?
Where are you getting your news from?
That is such a crock of shit.
No, it's not. Look at news feeds of liberals saying that Trump "assassinated" the terrorist. You do not assassinate a terrorist. You take them out at first sight.
For instance, the far left wing loon Rose McGowan APOLOGIZED to Iran for taking out this terrorist.
Also, the speakers of the House, Illian Omar and AOC, tweeted that Trump ASSASSINATED the terrorist. She is in mourning for the loss to her.
They are not alone. Many other liberals agree with them.
Rose McGowan, Illian Omar and AOC do not represent "Almost every lib out there".
You're not that stupid.
But they do. I've never heard another lib speak out against them.
I'll leave the personal insult alone as I am not sure you meant to type what you did.
That is not "mourning".
No...they are in mourning. Just not saying it outright.
If libs really loved this country and cared about our military men and women, they would say that we should get behind President Trump and ensure Iran understands that the US will not stand for anymore of their antics, and will pay dearly if they tried any retaliation.
Instead, all we see are libs emboldening Iran by saying Trump escalated tension and calling the lawful takeout of a terrorist known for killing Americans and attacking American assets as an assassination.
That is sedition and giving our enemy comfort.
So I guess you think that if Iran kills the head of our Joint Chiefs of Staff, that wouldn't be an act of war if he was outside of the U.S.
Is the head of our Joint Chiefs of Staff on a terrorist watchlist, too?
Is he violating international travel bans? Is he plotting, planning, financing, and encouraging plots to kill Americans?
You can make all the excuses you want for the scumbucket, but I simply refuse to make any excuses for anything to do with the death of a known terrorist that was completely justified.
Sad when Americans root against America.
Another deflection. Yet another learned trump trait. Is the wall built yet? Is Hillary in jail yet? The do nothing party is alive and well and living in the Senate under Moscow Mitch's armpit.
Hahaha! You're so fuckin' right. How pathetic is that. How desperate is that. It's a crock that's funnier than shit! Goddam, that was fuckin' hilarious!
Actually, she was stating you couldn't be that stupid. That's giving you credit, don't you think? I could hardly call that a personal insult.
If the Joint Chiefs was known and recognized internationally as a terrorist who arbitrarily killed soldiers and innocent civilians in other than countries, then, no. It won't be an act of war.
Oh my God, Jizzerror. Somebody is deflecting from your seed. Where is your meme to point that out?
Hypocrite?
OK, maybe so. I misread. My apologies to Pat.
Nope.
Then why are you supporting actions that will result in the deaths of more Americans...???
(Curious minds want to know!)
I am not.
Nor am I naïve enough to think that doing nothing was successful in the least little bit.
Americans had died and would continue to die because of the actions of this terrorist.
That would be projection which is the prime mantra and MO of the gop and this 'president'
My thoughts exactly.
No, Obama only got the US involved in wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine. Let us not forget his 2 troop surges in Afghanistan along with his shitty SOFA agreement tying the US to a weak, corrupt Afghan government. Or the fact Obama sent US troops back into Iraq to rearm and retain Iraqi troops for a second time; and save a government that is loyal to Iran. Not to mention his extra judicial drone killing program across the ME; including 2 US citizens w/o trial.
Who's pathetic?
The f'ing Democrats that have removable backbones.
One second screaming at Trump for trying to withdraw troops from Syria; so now they are still there in the middle of harms way. The next screaming that Trump didn't consult their corrupt, seditious, leaking asses about killing a known terrorist that has killed thousands, including US forces and personnel, and was openly plotting more attacks in Iraq and Syria.
Of course had not Trump acted the Democrat neocons and chicken hawks would have blasted Trump for ignoring Iranian terrorist activities.
But Trruuummmmppppp!!!!!!
Who's pathetic?
The moronic left that seem to think this won't all come back to bite them in their collective asses the next time a Democrat holds the White House.
That's what I expected, Republican deflections.
Would you like to express an opinion about the topic of this article?
Did you watch the fucking video?
The memes are stupid. We know you can do better than that, right?
Nope, that is the best effort.
A little sad, isn't it?
Meh...I thought he was better than that. Guess I was wrong.
The deflections are stupid.
Yes, the deflections are sad.
You're always wrong.
Memes are still stupid.
Come on [[Deleted]] we know you can do better. Don't disappoint...s/
Thanks for providing an example of a CoC violation.
I knew you wouldn't disappoint.
Butt don't worry I never flag comments.
How exactly is that a CoC? A shortening of your screen name? Really?
Yes. Really.
Since 2005 when NV was created, it was against the rules to mock avatars and screen names.
That tradition & rule has been and will be continued here on NT as a CoC violation. SP
"really? ... [blink. blink blink...]"
Well, that made no sense...
That's ridiculous.
[deleted]
Derp.
Aw, did someone hurt your feelings?
Derp.
But it's Wally. It's what he does.
Yep.
He said I'm deflecting from my own article.
I post dozens of comments about the Trumpsters deflections.
Yes, it depends on whether it's done for the purpose of mocking.
Do you think that Tex is mocking of your screen name Tex? Have you told other members that you feel mocked when they call you Tex? Have you flagged those comments? I for one should have had dozens of tickets.
I can't see how you'd think that Miss is a mockery of your screen name but same questions.
I can see Dulay's comments but am ignoring them.
You're breaking my heart Tex.
I'll try real hard to muster up some sympathy for your little broken heart!
No you're not ignoring Dulay's comments. Here's the proof you provided:
It was certainly easy to prove your comment was a lie. Maybe you should consider spamming someone else's threads.
AGAIN with the Spam thingy?
Perhaps you should consider a change to your diet.
What fun would that be? /sac
You've posted over a hundred comments on my last three articles.
Many of those comments were directed at me.
So, you're either spamming my threads or you're stalking me.
Are you spamming anyone else on NT?
I have an Apple MacBook so you can't peek in my windows.
Sorry, my bad. I shouldn't have suggested spamming someone else.
I don't want anyone to get spammed.
I'm flattered you cared enough to keep track! Or did the site number them for you?
Nope. Is this the new topic now--spamming?
Am I?
why, I would never dream of it!
Well that whole ignoring thingy didn't last very long did it Tex?
It was brought to my attention by my chief of security.
He was concerned about the way you drone on and on and on and on and on and on and on....
I told him not to worry. Your kind of droning is just boring, not dangerous.
The duration of that thingy demonstrated the same staying power that Trump has.
Nope? You're not spamming me?
Then why are you posting so many comments on my content?
I guess that means you're stalking me.
I already have a NewsTalkers girlfriend - Cobalt.
TRUMP!
If you want hypocrisy, which is what your video suggests, go back to 1999 and look at the videos of Schiff, Nadler, Schumer and Pelosi during the Clinton impeachment.
Seems like they feel none of that happened 20 years later.
What was the word you used again?
Oh, yea...that's right..
Hypocrisy
How does the video suggest that al want's hypocrisy? Be specific.
You are too easy. [deleted] wants us to admit that Trump is a hypocrite. So maybe he is by his past tweets.
Of course, libs will never admit the same, especially by a few choice lib/prog/dems during the Clinton impeachment. Seems amnesia is the condition of order these days for prog/libs.
[deleted]
This is NOT your article.
Do NOT tell anyone to "go away".
I called for Clinton to resign (even before he was impeached).
That's what she said.
You inability to address Trump's hypocrisy without spewing whataboutism is noted, as is your failure to answer my question.
Nope, I'm a member of this group.
As did I. I didn't given a rat's ass about the blowjob; I cared only that he lied to Congress.
Never one for logic. You don't agree with the subject matter; you don't agree with the commenters; you're not a member of this group; you have added nothing even close to intellectual intercourse ... and you're telling others to leave? Does that even make sense?
Holy shit.
And we're lucky to have you.
Well the blowjob left a stain on the office (and a dress).
I just got tired of having to explain "oral sex" to my children.
If you gathered every haz mat specialist out there, they could not remove the stain on the office Trump has created.
I see you're still deflecting.
Care to comment on the video in this article?
It seems no one on the right is addressing the hypocrisy issue. trump is the king of hypocrisy.
All hypocrites have one thing in common: they're offended by the truth. Everyone hypocrite here doesn't have an ounce of self-respect or honor. President Obama ended the life of osama bin laden and trump can't even acknowledge that.
And I would worry about anyone who has loved ones being sent to the mideast. Given that trumplethinskin has told the world that he doesn't like people who were captured, I'm loathe to think that any Americans captured will be thought of as fodder for torture since the Traitor-In-Chief wouldn't like them enough to send reinforcements for rescue. He doesn't like people who are captured. And the five time deferment coward has stated that on the world stage.
I don't give a shit what any right leaner has to say. I don't put any weight whatsoever to those who don't have any pride, any dignity, any self-esteem. They would rightfully be outraged if President Obama would have done 1/100th of the shit that trump has done. I would have too. But those supporters are disgusting. There's a trump derangement syndrome alright. But it's the right.
Let's see where this takes us, shall we?
Yep.
There's also a Trump Deflection Syndrome.
I guess they can't defend the indefensible.
Hypocrisy
Sniff, sniff. Still can't quite over it, can you?
wow...you really engaged the ol' brain on that comment didn't you?
Yes, there is a bit of hypocrisy there, but I don't remember you being upset about all of the comments Schiff, Scumer, Pelosi and no nads Nadler made during the Clinton impeachment, but seemed to have forgotten about those comments 20 years later.
Plus, Trump didn't START this mess.
That is something Democrats tend to forget.
I suppose we could have looked the other way and continued to let the terrorist plot, plan, orchestrate, and finance American deaths.
Doesn't that sound reasonable?
It does to the libs. Lord knows we don't want to hurt a terrorist's feeeeeeeeelings.
Gotta deflect.
Yep, that one is stupid, too.
Still can't discuss the video?
Explain what you consider to be hypocritical about this old video.
I just don't see it.
But I trust you do, so explain it.
Aaaaaaand that one's stupid too.
I think you are wasting everyone's time by making them scroll through the stupidity.
Did Obama start a war with Iran? No.
Did Trump commit an act of war against Iran? Yes.
I'm not forcing you to stay here and waste your time.
Okay.
If you consider our response to getting attacked an act of war, so be it.
If that makes Trump hypocritical to you, who gives a damn? Sue him, or better yet, get Nancy to impeach him.
What Trump did was justified and long overdue. Whether you accept that or not doesn't matter. The man was a fucking TERRORIST. Get it yet? A TERRORIST!
People criticizing Trump for an 8+year old video or tweet are simply engaging in political flim-flam, and refuse to recognize facts.
He was the second most important government official in Iran.
Get it?
I know you can't handle the truth.
I don't care if he was the Grand Poobah. He was a terrorist first and foremost, responsible for hordes of American deaths, in clear violation of international travel bans and got exactly what he deserved.
Yeah, I get it .
Bad Man Dead.
Right on!
I won't apologize for a President doing exactly what I and many others would have done. Ignoring terrorists doesn't make them go away, it only emboldens them.
Because the timing didn't suit you and you simply detest the man who issued the orders isn't my concern.
It was the right thing to do.
When were we attacked?
Really?
And you don't care that it constitutes an act of war.
The Iranians said it's an act of war and they have promised to retaliate.
Terrorists just killed an American soldier and two American contractor in Kenya. Please tell their loved ones that you don't care.
Another missile hit the green zone in Baghdad.
Butt Americans are safer right?
Americans have been asked to leave the area (because it's safer).
They better not get captured. Five time deferment Traitor in Chief will leave them there. He doesn't like people who get captured.
Been watching nothing but CNN and MSDNC again, huh?
Gee, I consider it an act of war when Americans are attacked and killed. I have no regrets for responding and saving lives.
Yes, there will be retaliation. That is what this was--retaliation to a known terrorist responsible for American deaths. I won't apologize for him getting what was due.
No one knows for sure what Iran's response will be.
WE DO know, however, what actions they have undertaken in the last 20 or so years, actions resulting in American deaths.
And it will continue to happen if we simply ignore it as we have done.
That is proven, that is a fact.
And that isn't acceptable any longer.
That's why the Iranians use proxies to attack Americans and Israelis (and Saudis).
What Trump did is escalate the situation.
I hope it can be de-escalated (even though Trumps and his supporters are not interested in de-esculation).
If by escalating you mean he dealt a blow to terrorism in the region you are correct.
When a gang leader sends his boys to get you, you don't deal with them, You go to the leader.
We've pussyfooted around for far too long, suffering attack after attack after attack.
What we have been doing for decades simply ain't working.
Time to try new tactics.
Of course that is not true.
My belief is that by Trump doing what he did by taking out the terrorist, he let Iran know what to expect if they try anything stupid.
Trump saved American lives by taking out this POS. He was responsible for the deaths of thousands. Now, he's dead. He will no longer kill innocents.
If his successor tries anything, he will be in the same predicament.
His first words when he found out he was the successor?
"Aw shit!!"
Do you have an answer?
Making unfounded and irrelevant comments again, huh.
Yes.
Use your words, use your words.
Not impressed.
You are accusing me of lying again, yet your boy Donald is the biggest liar in history.
I do hope we can de-escalate this shit and avoid losing more lives.
In 2016 Trump promised to get us out of these endless wars and bring our troops home.
I wish that was true.
Good, that makes us even.
I was spectacularly unimpressed with your question.
Yet you still can't state WHEN the Iranians attacked the US.
Sure I can. I have the Google now!
Obama managed to get 20 sailors released.
I hope Trump doesn't get a bunch of Americans killed.
What is your preference?
War with Iran?
Neocons have wanted war with Iran for decades.
It appears that Trump is going to give them what they want.
Obama got Iran to sign the JCPOA which Trump has shredded.
Obama showed us that using sanctions and negotiating with Iran can yield results.
I guess we are going to find out what Trump's threats can accomplish.
" Non-Binding" is such a cowardly Greatness !
"Peace in our time" !
Iran adhered to the agreement until Trump ripped it up.
Are you afraid that Iran has Nukes...… now ?
My question exactly.
Don't expect an answer.
Of course, so do I, but if Iran does retaliate and kills more Americans, do we take the route the left prefers and sit back, do nothing, and just hope they will go away. That has been their point of view for 40 years.
No, butt they're working on it again.
Here's what they said the Trump withdrew from the agreement:
Here what they say now after the killing of Soleimani:
[deleted]
Iran was so in-compliance with the "Non-Binding" agreement by Obama and Crew (According to an inspector), it only took them a day or two to get things back on track again ?
What are the "Other" countries that signed-on and Praised this "Non-Binding" agreement, doing about Iran's …… "Threat" ?
How do you know how long it will take for them to get "back on track".
I'm surprised that anyone would find Iran's intention to make nukes a laughing matter.
Well, no sane person would laugh about Iran getting nukes.
How do you know that they weren't always on track in the first place ?
'cause some inspector that wasn't allowed to go to certain places in Iran (Read Non-Binding Agreement) in the first place, said so ?
I already answered that question (comment # 7.2.39 author al Jizzerror replied to It Is ME @ 7.2.38 ).
Please read it this time.
You're "Fooling" yourself with that repeat of nothingness !
Reading is fundamental. This is part of the referenced document:
Understanding reality is being "Smart" (History ALWAYS proceeds word salads of the day).
"(Mis)Reading the IAEA reports on Iran's nuclear program"
Did you click on any of the "Backup" links in the article ?
This little link in the "Opinion Piece" (as you note it is)....is a fun read:
Institute for Science and International Security
Analysis of the IAEA’s Seventh Iran Nuclear Deal Report: Still Little Detail and Potential Verification Problems
by David Albright and Andrea Stricker - September 1, 2017
This ones a Hoot too:
U.S. pressure or not, U.N. nuclear watchdog sees no need to check Iran military sites
Soooooo….the 2019 summary by the IAEA inspector, should make one wonder if they actually did their job to it's "Fullest" extent.
That article is based on an opinion from the FDD (a conservative think tank).
The shit published by that stink tank is not reliable.
Is anyone? I'm never impressed by those who come into an article just to make ridiculous statements. I will never understand the mindset of someone who knows they don't agree with an article and author, who refuse to engage to intellectual intercourse, who refuse to offer something of substance, etc.
This may surprise the fuck out of you but in the real world, not everything is black or white. Intelligent people recognize that interaction requires nuance.
Based on your comment, you don't know what you don't know.
Drivel.
I do NOT share your preference.
I'm glad you have a hobby.
Why don't you post a list of the acts of war that Iran has committed against the US since 2000 so we can decide how to react?
Take your strawmen to someone who plays that game FW.
Why do you insist on spewing bullshit like that?
It's just fucking ridiculous.
Why are you so obsessed with "sucking crank"?
Who are you claiming will die because of Trump being removed from office? You don't seem to understand that your comment disses Pence big time.
Who has done that here FW?
Post some evidence of that FW. Any evidence.
I'm much more interested in why so many 'conservatives' are so ready and willing to support and insane regime in the United States.
That's only apparent to you apparently.
Please don't hold your breath waiting for that evidence.
So you have NO evidence yet you continue to spew the same stupid shit.
What's more stupid? You thinking everything on this thread is stupid or you for staying here and continuing to make ridiculous claims?
I'll take Bugsy for a thousand, Alex.
I should start commenting in this group more often. I understand there is more leeway as to the commenting style in the groups.
CB, you have been pinpointing stupidity. Keep up the good work.
I'm building an "I don't give a damn" in an attempt to prevent the bullshit that's being spewed on this thread from contaminating the computers that belong to the intelligent people using NewsTalkers. I hope your computer isn't affected by all of the right-wing shit.
Actually, there isn't FW. There is NO evidence that I attack anyone, there is plenty of evidence that I call out COMMENTS.
Where did I do that FW?
Again, save your strawmen for those who play that game.
Ditto for the radical alt right. Point?
Pffft.
My computer AND I are current on our vaccinations against RW BS.
For once, a tweet I can agree with. The EC unleashed this disaster on us.
Hypocrisy
Hypocrisy
Hypocrisy
Too many to count and too many to spend my time on. It's a beautiful day. I have lunch and love to make.
When has Trump launched a strike into Iran?
It's hypocritical to question whether in the future, members will admit they were wrong and ignore the fact that Trump has never admitted he was wrong.
Obama didn't launch a strike on Iran OR any of their leadership. Nor did he threaten to attack their cultural centers.
= Liberalism
Why attack when you can just dump pallets of cash off in the middle of the night?
That seemed to make things better, right?
So you still can't discuss the video?
So why are you (and others) here? You have nothing of substance to add, you want to bob and weave while leaving midget comments, your typical land on an article and leave troll shit in the aisles, just to say you did something that served no purpose.
Not one comment of substance. Sad. Deplorably, deplorably sad. For you. Because I enjoy the shit out of it.
Sorry, but every one of my comments have substance. Anytime the stupidity of the ideology of liberalism is pointed out, and it is regularly, there is much substance to be had.
Just because you can't deal with it...
I hate to see you getting bored with the deflections.
I made this meme for your amusement.
The impotence of tRump and his supporters is so appalling.
I think you meant "importance".
Sure I can. I love that you're always wrong.
Trump didn't attack Iran.
What ever makes you think that?
He attacked a known terrorist in Iraq, where he wasn't even allowed to be.
His last mistake!
And liberals are mourning.
Why do you drag out 8 year old videos to cry about?
Didn't you do enough when they first came out?
Here, let me put two and two together for you.
Cobalt:
Hypocrisy, and then a tweet from Trump about Obama attacking Iran.
Well, here is where it gets tricky for you, I guess.
Trump didn't attack Iran. That is just a fact, and I don't gove a damn whether or not you know that.
SO unless Trump attacked Iran, (which he clearly did not), there is no hypocrisy in it. Despite what some left-wing, hysteria-driven fools think.
Thanks for allowing me to explain it to you.
Next?
As usual, you don't see the bigger picture. It would mean any foreign country. Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq. No matter the country, the intent is what's at stake. The intent was to start a war, or show an act of aggression, in order to get reelected. Think about it, Texan. Or is Sunday a day of rest for intellect?
We are enjoying seeing your rabid support of trump. I love seeing it. See, there are two types of trump supporters. There are those that sincerely thought he could bring about change. They hoped he would take the job seriously. And they admit they have made some mistakes. Then there are those who are either thinly veiled racists or those that love seeing some guy want to fuck his daughter.
Just because some choose to attach sinister motives to some actions doesn't mean that it is true.
Or does your intellect not allow you to see more than one angle?
Well, good thing I am of the first description, huh?
BTW, I'm glad you see what support looks like, unlike literal adoration and worship of the followers of the past occupant of the White House.
That's a fucking lie.
Nope. Full scale mourning in progress.
Please post evidence of this so-called "mourning".
We have been through this already. Let me repost it for you again.Maybe you missed it...
No...they are in mourning. Just not saying it outright.
If libs really loved this country and cared about our military men and women, they would say that we should get behind President Trump and ensure Iran understands that the US will not stand for anymore of their antics, and will pay dearly if they tried any retaliation.
Instead, all we see are libs emboldening Iran by saying Trump escalated tension and calling the lawful takeout of a terrorist known for killing Americans and attacking American assets as an assassination.
That is sedition and giving our enemy comfort.
Liberals are in mourning because this guy will no longer be responsible for American deaths that liberals can blame Trump for.
Derp.
DERP.
So no liberals have said they're mourning Soleimani butt you are pretending they're mourning him anyway.
Wow! That is one of the dumbest statements posted in this thread.
No liberals are "mourning" Soleimani.
That premise is fucking idiotic.
I stand by my statement. They are in mourning, just not saying it outright.
Along with that, they are celebrating because it gives them yet another reason to blame Trump if Iran retaliates.
They then will freak out when Trump attacks back.
I just don't understand why the left is so adamant about protecting a terrorist after it is well documented he is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American soldiers.
It is a bad case of "he is a bad guy, and should be taken out, but the wrong guy took him out".
TDS at it's finest.
So, go ahead and stand by that ridiculous statement (even though you can't provide a shred of evidence that supports it).
Just like Trump in the video claiming Obama will attack Iraq.
You are just as wrong as Trump was.
Unfortunately, the left wing media speaks for itself. Also the Hollywood idiots and many of those on here. They can't wait for an Iranian strike that will kill Americans so they can blame Trump. No matter that Iran has been killing Americans for decades.
That's total fucking bullshit.
Nope. Like always, I'm right.
Yeah, you're extreme right-wing.
Butt nobody wants "an Iranian strike that will kill Americans".
That's bullshit.
Okay. If that bullshit is what "left wing media" says and "many of those on here" are saying that shit, please post a quotation to back up that fucking lie.
They can't. They just think if they say shit often enough, it's true. I love watching it.
You're as often right as Texan is. Which is never.
Wow...that really hurt s/. Almost like it was sent out by a 12 year old.
Thanks for the personal insult, and the CoC violation. Of course unlike some....cough cough... you cough, I won't flag it.
Let me redirect you back to 8.2.12
they are in mourning. Just not saying it outright.
They are hoping something bad happens so they can blame Trump
On the flip side, if this dead terrorist was allowed to live, then went on to kill other Americans, the left would blame Trump for being weak.
Sorry to tell you, but AMERICA is tired of the left's BS.
I thought right wingers were proud to be deplorables
Tex wants me. He can't stay away from me. It's like Trumplelthinskin dreaming about Ivanka ... in that way. Wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
Gee, I thought you would consider that a compliment.
Flag me all you want, I don't care if you flag every comment I post.
I have never flagged anything on this site and I never will.
You should take something for that cough.
That's total fucking bullshit.
You know it's not.
On the lighter side...I do like your avatar. A dead terrorist. Something Trump is assuring happens over and over again.
All of Trump's videos are pathetic. This is just one more.
In the video Trump did not accuse Obama of attacking Iran. Obama never said he would attack Iran. Trump made that shit up.
Nobody said Trump has attacked Iran. Butt Trump killed the head of Iran's military and has been rattling his saber ever since.
Trump has threatened to bomb Iran (including their "cultural sites" which is a war crime).
Obama got Iran to sign the JCPOA. Trump shredded that agreement.
Did the very same Iran that signed that agreement also defy IAEA inspectors and have failed to answer certain questions in defiance of that agreement?
The IAEA said Iran was in compliance with the agreement.
https://newsrnd.com/news/2019-09-10-iaea-requests-prompt-response-from
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iran-news-iaea-nuclear-agency-us-iranian-breaches-nuke-iran-over..
https://newsrnd.com/news/2019-09-10-iaea-requests-prompt-response-from
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iran-news-iaea-nuclear-agency-us-iranian-breaches-nuke-iran-over..
That is five months after Trump shredded the agreement.
This is based on the last quarterly report before Trump officially withdrew from the agreement:
He loves American war criminals. Hell, the people who come here because they feel they kick the dust up are entertainingly pathetic. Can't stay on other's like minded seeds, but they come here spouting the most ridiculous rhetoric. Love, love, love it!
I understand there was yet another protest in DC against Trump today. There were about 12 people there.
There would have been millions, but most of the libs here in the US flew to Iran to attend the funeral of the dead terrorist.
More stupid bullshit.
This was Saturday in DC. Looks like at least 13 people.
Sigh....I understand most on the left is accustomed to being wrong, so this may come as a surprise to you...
this was today
Now, in the first frame of the video, it shows 23 people, give or take 1. In my original post, I stated there were 12. Another site updated the number at 1pm and said 10 more people showed. That put the number to 22.
Again, I am right.
Weakest shit I've ever seen here. Weak, weak, weak. And fuckin' desperate.
It's the dumbest shit I've seen.
But probably the most correct.
Prove it. Unless you meant the weak shit comment was most correct. Then in that case, you're finally right. Ha~!
Your comments prove you're desperate.
Nothing desperate about me. Liberals are mourning the killing of this terrorist.
THAT is a correct statement.
Aren't you just a little embarrassed about making such a ridiculous comment?
Well, being a Trumpster is a major embarrassment so it makes people used to being embarrassed all of the time.
After while they can spew bullshit on social sites and it doesn't even bother them.
Off topic. I'm waiting for the seeder to come and tell you that s/
Well, I guess the topic of this article (hypocrisy) eludes even the seeder.
The Hypocrite-in-Chief:
When has he sent kids to die?
We notice you would never dare put up a meme of Obama, who actually DID send kids out to die.
So lets see. Who is it that struck Iran "just before the election"? Well, it wasn't the previous prez was it?
As the Trumpsters will be quick to yammer about, Trump hasn't actually struck Iran (yet).
Right now Trump is merely on the warm up lap.
Sure, he's doing everything he can to provoke a war with Iran, like killing their top general and threatening to bomb 52 sites in Iran, butt it's not quite close enough to the election to actually start the war.
He loves to talk shit though and he's stirring the pot by threatening to commit war crimes. Butt, the Bone-Spur-inChief has to act tough for his twit wits for awhile to get them whipped up into crazed mob before he attacks.
Torches and pitchforks will go on sale soon at all Trump locations. They're the perfect gift for the crazy MFers in your family.
You know history.
The Republicans like to rewrite history.
Lindsey Graham is wearing flip-flops.
He called Trump a conman (and worse) in 2016.
Lindsey has been Trump's girlfriend since 2017.
Exactly. Apparently eating the corn out of Trumps shit is addictive.
Well put!
There may be some RWers here who would drink their "Fool-Aid" with that shit.