╌>

Thanks to Trump, the liberal 9th Circuit is no longer liberal

  
Via:  Vic Eldred  •  5 years ago  •  7 comments


Thanks to Trump, the liberal 9th Circuit is no longer liberal
The president’s recent appointments are tilting the balance of the court toward conservatives.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



President Trump and conservative commentators routinely mock the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit as intolerably liberal: It’s the “ Ninth Circus ” to Rush Limbaugh, the “ Nutty Ninth ” to former NRATV commentator Dan Bongino, “a complete & total disaster,”   according to   the president. For the political right, it’s an institution loathed for once   finding   that the words “under God” meant mandatory public-school recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance runs afoul of the First Amendment; for once engaging in an   all-night battle   with the Supreme Court over the constitutionality of an execution; and for   thrice enjoining   the Trump administration’s infamous travel ban. The 9th Circuit is so notorious among congressional Republicans that as recently as the last Congress, they held   hearings   to consider splitting up the circuit geographically, on the premise its rulings, which once applied to a reported 4 percent of the country, now cover 20 percent of Americans — too much liberal influence, perhaps.

But that’s about to change. Once the president’s current 9th Circuit nominees are confirmed, there will be 12 GOP appointees among the court’s 29 full-time judges with one vacancy left for the president to fill. Almost half of the bench will lean right. Thanks to Trump, the liberal 9th Circuit will be liberal no more.

WFWD3RR2XUI6TMIL6BNCFZ2YMU.jpg
Eric Miller, recently confirmed as a judge for the 9th Circuit, attends a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Oct. 24, 2018. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The president has conservative nominees slated to fill four out of five vacancies: Daniel P. Collins, who,   according to   Climate Liability News, “has defended the oil industry in high-profile climate and environmental cases,” and who clerked for the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia; Daniel A. Bress, who also clerked for Scalia and, at 39, would likely serve on the federal appellate bench for decades; Kenneth Lee, who   worked in President George W. Bush’s White House and has written articles   criticizing   affirmative action programs; and Bridget Bade, a federal magistrate judge who   clerked for   conservative Judge Edith Jones of the 5th Circuit.

cddf8f53-bridget-bade-Getty.jpg?ve=1&tl=
Bridget S. Bade, nominated to be a U.S. circuit judge for the Ninth Circuit, during her nomination hearing held by the Senate Judiciary Committee in October 2018. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images, File)


If they’re ultimately confirmed, these four will join three recent Trump appointees already on the 9th Circuit with conservative bona fides:  Ryan D. Nelson , who served on the staff of former senator and Trump attorney general Jeff Sessions;  Mark Bennett , a onetime Republican attorney general of Hawaii; and Eric Miller, who clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas, was  opposed by  liberal-leaning Native American advocacy organizations and was confirmed earlier this week over the  objections  of both of his Democratic home-state senators.
These new judges follow several 9th Circuit judges who were among the most liberal ever to sit on a federal court, including the late Stephen Reinhardt, the “liberal lion” who authored the opinion  tossing  California’s ban on same-sex marriage; and the late Harry Pregerson, arguably even more liberal than Reinhardt, who in his 1979 confirmation hearing  told  the Senate that “if I had to follow my conscience or the law, I would follow my conscience.” They’re also filling vacancies left by unpredictable, libertarian-leaning conservative Judge Alex Kozinski, who  retired  in 2017 facing sexual harassment allegations, and the late John Noonan, a tough-to-label moderate whose decisions often leaned  on Catholic moral teaching .

These new and soon-to-be judges will have a significant impact on the median political alignment of the 9th Circuit and will likely make a difference in at least three ways: First, because the 9th Circuit decides many appeals in three-judge panels composed of both active judges and older, often part-time judges — a group of 18 “senior” judges   split 9-9   between Republican and Democratic appointees — these numbers mean any given panel will have a nearly even chance to draw a majority of Republican-appointed judges as Democrat-appointed ones. That means the 9th Circuit will boast a political balance not seen in decades, at least since President Jimmy Carter and a post-Watergate Democratic congressional majority   added 10 judgeships   to the court in the late 1970s.

Second, it means that   en banc panels , which are 11-member super-panels typically made up of randomly selected active judges, have a much greater chance of seating a conservative majority than before Trump took office. En banc panels have extraordinary power to reshape the circuit’s law because they can redecide three-judge panel decisions and even overrule the circuit’s own past precedent.

Third, Trump’s group of nominees includes no slouches. They’re all experienced practitioners with stellar credentials. Accordingly, once fully staffed, the court’s conservative wing will be newly empowered with sharp, young minds capable of steering the law in a more conservative direction over time.

Recall how we got here: In 2013, when Democrats controlled the Senate, they did away with filibuster protection for the appointment of federal judges (other than Supreme Court justices), and the current Republican-led Senate is effectively doing away with informal confirmation delays arising from the “blue slip” process, which once allowed home-state senators to indefinitely impede votes on disputed nominees. When Trump took office, he had one of the highest judicial vacancy rates in recent history, which a   New York Times review   in early 2017 suggests that he could appoint almost 40 percent of the federal judiciary during his tenure in the White House.

And unlike some of the appointees of his immediate Republican predecessors, there’s no need for Trump’s nominees to be considered moderate enough to secure a filibuster-proof 60-plus votes. With little need to gain interparty support, Trump can choose nominees who’ve been   approved   by staunchly conservative legal groups like the Federalist Society.

This translates to a shift in the development of the law in a jurisdiction that covers roughly 60 million people. While the Supreme Court has stepped in over the years to overrule the 9th Circuit, only a few cases wind up getting high court review each year, compared to   more than 7,000 cases   the 9th Circuit decides in the same period. Some of those are news-making decisions that the Supreme Court just doesn’t take up, such as a decision   allowing   local governments to restrict gun sales and another   blocking   the Trump administration from unilaterally reinterpreting U.S. asylum law.

But thousands are routine cases unlikely to merit high court involvement: whether an immigrant seeking review of a deportation order will be allowed to remain in the country; whether a criminal defendant’s challenge to his conviction will be affirmed or set aside; or whether a police officer will be deemed to have acted reasonably in the line of duty. Appellate courts do most of their work in these cases, which are less likely to create new law and in which a judge’s ideological bent can, and often does, make a difference. A more conservative 9th Circuit means a more conservative legal regime for a large portion of the country.

In reality, the 9th Circuit’s liberal reputation has been   overstated for some time . President Barack Obama’s nominees to the court were less liberal than President Bill Clinton’s, whose nominees, in turn, were less liberal than Carter’s. Likewise, reports claiming the 9th as the most-reversed circuit by the Supreme Court   are misleading : It is the largest circuit and hears the most cases overall, so it produces more potential cases for the Supreme Court to review. As a percentage of cases heard, though, the 9th Circuit was only the   fourth-most reversed circuit in the 2017-2018 term.

Whether it’s been overstated, however, conservatives will have a hard time calling the 9th Circuit the “Nutty Ninth” with 13 Republican nominees to 16 Democratic ones. Within a few years, Trump will have rendered this liberal icon a thing of the past.

636528406262688901-BXX-JUMP-0123-9681642
Senate Leader Mitch McConnell






a6ed1bb7-e8ec-4822-bd16-5a9a144b1022.jpg


Ben Feuer Ben Feuer is chairman of the California Appellate Law Group LLP and a former clerk for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

He's making America great again!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    5 years ago

Indeed he is! 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    5 years ago

He's making America a shithole.  

America was much better before it became 'president'

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2    5 years ago
a shithole.  

That's an interesting description. What's your definition?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    5 years ago

It’s a great start, but republican appointed judges are not necessarily conservatives. Democrats, for decades, have focused on only appointing, liberal justices. It’s only now, under trump, that republicans are acting like democrats.

In the past, republicans have allowed democrats to pick some  nominees in “trades” and have even appointed liberal judges who the senate rejected in the hope of securing “good will” from democrats.  Democrats, of course, still called bush a Nazi etc..

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    5 years ago

At one time the "strict constructionism " Conservative Judges simply defended whatever the law was including the activist rulings of liberal judges. That all changed with Bush v. Gore in 2000. That's when the left finally got it's comeuppance. It's a shame that the Judiciary is constantly overstepping it's authority, but with congress mired in gridlock and the Court all too willing to fill the void, we might as well have judges that serve the American people, the Constitution and the rule of law.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    5 years ago

Judges come and go, that is why every president has the opportunity to appoint many federal judges. 

All of Trump's 'accomplishments' will be fleeting, in one sense of the word or another. The world moves inexorably in the direction of progressivism. Now we need politicians that will catch up. 

Conservatives keep imagining that society will "go back" to some earlier utopian period that never existed anyway. That is not the way the world works. 

 
 

Who is online








Snuffy
Sean Treacy
Ozzwald


59 visitors