╌>

Trump set for another victory after Roberts waffles again

  
By:  Vic Eldred  •  5 years ago  •  15 comments


Trump set for another victory after Roberts waffles again
"We spend $20 billion on a census," Trump told attendees. "They go through houses, they go up, they ring doorbells, they talk to people. How many toilets do they have? How many desks do they have? How many beds? What's their roof made of? The only thing we can't ask is, are you a citizen of the United States. Isn't it the craziest thing?"

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

After suffering a temporary setback when the SCOTUS issued a decision based on "why the President wanted to put a citizenship question on the 2020 Census", the President has emerged with a much better plan which may or may not produce an accurate count. The President will now turn to the Commerce Department and maybe other departments to estimate the number of illegal aliens in each state.
I kind of wish I was running the Commerce Department. I'd have a report estimating all Illegal aliens to be living in Texas!  BTW, by now I would have had every Obama or Clinton appointee booted out of the Department and every staffer and Department official tested for objectivity. Enough about what ifs! The issue now is what the President is about to do.

He has been blocked by lower court justices as well as being torpedoed by the easily intimidated Justice Roberts.
However, the public is with him on this issue:

"Six in 10 registered voters, 60 percent, in a Hill-HarrisX survey released Tuesday said that the U.S. Census Bureau should ask the citizenship question even if it results in fewer responses. Another 21 percent said the question should not be included, while 19 percent were unsure."

https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/441372-most-americans-support-citizenship-question-on-census-form-poll




In other words, although Trump was denied adding the question by the Courts, he wins in the court of public opinion. His decision to get an estimate from Government agencies is sure to be challenged by the usual leftist groups like the ACLU and "the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law". Politically, he is on the right side as far as the American public is concerned.


Just having this issue benefits him in 2020 and if he can provide an estimate after being denied an actual count, it becomes a win/win!


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

It's called Checkmate!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    5 years ago

I don't think so!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    5 years ago

Well, we will get to see it play out. Interesting times we are living in.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
1.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.1    5 years ago

Interesting , 

is how you see Trumps' loss, as a win, just like every other thing Trump does, the "right" can never find any thing wrong in it 

That's just plain Wrong 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1.2    5 years ago

Asking about citizenship is wrong?

Why?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
1.1.5  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.1.3    5 years ago

All it will accomplish is an inaccurate census count imo

plus

cost Tens of Millions more to reprint etc

im not pro illegal immigrants, they cost me my business 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @1.1.4    5 years ago
 How fucked up is that.

Just fucked up enough to guarantee that CA will remain a blue state

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  igknorantzrulz @1.1.5    5 years ago
All it will accomplish is an inaccurate census count imo

plus

cost Tens of Millions more to reprint etc

So, we should estimate how many illegals are living among us? There have been studies done. The studies estimate a lot more than the 11 million wev'e been hearing about for over a decade.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    5 years ago

It has absolutely no bearing whatsoever 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2    5 years ago

"The U.S. Constitution empowers the Congress to carry out the census in "such manner as they shall by Law direct" (Article I, Section 2). The Founders of our fledgling nation had a bold and ambitious plan to empower the people over their new government. The plan was to count every person living in the newly created United States of America, and to use that count to determine representation in the Congress."


 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    5 years ago

The census would still count everyone without the question.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.1    5 years ago

The Constitution? Don't you believe in the rule of law?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.1    5 years ago
The census would still count everyone without the question. 

Oh I'm glad you changed that. That is true, but the problem is ONLY CITIZENS are to be represented!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.3    5 years ago

Well, that was almost too easy.

Have a good night all!

 
 

Who is online

JohnRussell
Just Jim NC TttH
Greg Jones
Igknorantzruls
Thomas


46 visitors