Pelosi out of order, dems change rules

  
By:  Vic Eldred  •  5 months ago  •  90 comments


Pelosi out of order, dems change rules
"There is no place anywhere for the president's words, which are not only divisive, but dangerous -- and have legitimized and increased fear and hatred of new Americans and people of color......Nancy Pelosi

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

A strange thing happened in the House of Representatives yesterday. The same House members who could not censor or specifically condemn members for making anti-Semitic remarks, rushed to formally condemn the President of the United States for what democratic leadership considered "racist" remarks. The formal resolution (H Res 489) condemned the President's remarks directed at certain members of congress. The vote was 240-187, with every democrat voting in lock step.

Perhaps it was Pelosi's way of trying to trap Republicans by creating a situation where Republicans would have to vote on a Trump statement. Something like asking Trump nominees about how they feel about Trump statements.



hqdefault.jpg


One big problem:

The problem was the rules of the House forbid it. House rule XVII, clause 1(B), requires remarks on the floor “be confined to the question under debate, avoiding personality."  Georgia rep Doug Collins (R) called her on it:

Collins immediately stood and asked if Pelosi wanted to "rephrase that comment."

"I have cleared my remarks with the parliamentarian before I read them," Pelosi claimed, before walking away to applause.

"Can I ask the words be taken down? I make a point of order that the gentlewoman's words are unparliamentary and be taken down ," Collins said.

The chair, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, (D) Then called for compliance: "The chair will remind all members, please, please, do not make personality-based comments" 

Screen-Shot-2019-07-16-at-4.52.27-PM-2-e
The confused Emanuel Cleaver

Collins then repeated his request as House democrats talked with the House P arliamentarian. While that was going on Pelosi let the House floor, which is another rule violation! Then Clever (the Chair) walked off! Rep Steny Hoyer (D) eventually took over the chair, then read a statement: "The words used by the gentlewoman from California contained an accusation of racist behavior on the part of the President, the words should not be used in debate, " he said, affirming the House parliamentarian's decision and technically banning Pelosi from speaking on the House floor for the rest of the day.

Then House democrats quickly voted to change the rules, restoring Pelosi's words and restoring her speaking privileges.

Democrats at work!

 


Article is Locked


 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
 
Vic Eldred
1  author  Vic Eldred    5 months ago

Simply stunning!

 
 
 
XDm9mm
1.1  XDm9mm  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    5 months ago
Simply stunning!

Well, like the kid that takes his ball and goes home, when the Democrats don't like something, they simply change the rules of the game to suit their wishes.

However, it's actually a blessing in disguise.  They have shown very loudly and publicly that if they were to ever regain the WH, Senate and House, there would be nothing, allow that word to sink in a minute, NOTHING, that they would not do, regardless of what the people want or the rules relating to passing laws.

They would make Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Mao proud.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2  author  Vic Eldred    5 months ago

“In America, if you hate our Country, you are free to leave. The simple fact of the matter is, the four Congresswomen think that America is wicked in its origins, they think that America is even more wicked now, that we are all racist and evil"....Donald Trump


Remarks to be classified as "racist" or stupid?

Was he attacking their race or their radicalism?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    5 months ago

"Go back where you came from"  is a well know racist slogan. Trump's stupidity (not knowing the individuals are all Americans and 3 of the 4 were born in America (AOC is literally as American as Donald Trump-one of her parents is a native born American and one is an immigrant exactly like Donald Trump himself)) tripped him up and gave him away. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    5 months ago

Maybe for you John. If one were listening to some of the statements those 4 radicals made, one might be confused as to where they were from. They have little love for America. BTW there are 14 members of congress born outside the US:

" There are 14 congressional members who were born outside the United States, all of whom are Democrats, who became U.S. citizens. Thirteen of the 14 members of Congress born outside of the United States to non-American parents serve in the House of Representatives. Three of them are from Mexico – Salud Carbajal and Raul Ruiz (California) and Jesus Garcia (Illinois), and two are from India – Raja Krishnamoorthi (Illinois) and Pramila Jayapal (Washington). Other congressional members were born in the Dominican Republic, Cuba, Taiwan, Poland, Ecuador, Vietnam, and Guatemala."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/07/15/ilhan-omar-jayapal-bennet-members-congress-born-outside-us/39688427/


The thing that bothers me more than Trump making a knee-jerk statement is somebody hiding behind their race after making anti-American & anti-Semitic statements!

 
 
 
XDm9mm
2.1.2  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    5 months ago
"Go back where you came from"  is a well know racist slogan.

Really?  I've personally told guys from England and France that.  So, am I now racist against other men, who like me, are white?

 
 
 
r.t..b...
2.2  r.t..b...  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    5 months ago
Remarks to be classified as "racist" or stupid?

Neither should be applied to anyone occupying this office. If he was attacking their radicalism, that demonstrates a lack of understanding as to how this great country was originally founded. If, and I believe he was, attacking their race, that speaks to his complete lack of understanding as to his role as President. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3  author  Vic Eldred    5 months ago

D_mRM87XUAALyqU?format=jpg&name=small




My advice to the President - To combat liberals, you don't have to become like them!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    5 months ago

Your career on Newstalkers seems to be dedicated to making daily excuses for President* Trump. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    5 months ago

I am as I have always been - a fierce opponent of the cancer known as "liberalism. Donald Trump may be crude, but he has taken on the left. He only needs to be careful not to alienate those of us who want a return to normalcy. I notice you are making this about Trump again. Do you have any opinion about what your democrats did yesterday?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    5 months ago

A few weeks ago the North Korean dictator criticized Joe Biden (possibly at Trump's request), saying that Biden is "low IQ" (sound familiar?). Trump tweeted out agreement with the NK dictator's attack on Biden ( a former vice president of the United States). 

The "traitor" here is Trump. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
3.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    5 months ago

All I can say John is just "Wow"!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    5 months ago
He only needs to be careful not to alienate those of us who want a return to normalcy.

Would that normalcy be Koch brothers normalcy or John Birch Society normalcy ? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.3    5 months ago

Good. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
3.1.6  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.5    5 months ago

It wasn't a compliment.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.7  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.6    5 months ago

My "good" was in agreement with your brevity. Keep all your responses to one sentence, and I think the forum will benefit. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.8  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    5 months ago
Your career on Newstalkers seems to be dedicated to making daily excuses for President* Trump.

Actually, your 'career' on NT is nothing but a continual barrage of vitriolic diatribes against President Trump and any and all that support him and his SUCCESSFUL policies.

Some of us simply expend too much time continually refuting the vitriol spewed.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.9  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.7    5 months ago
Keep all your responses to one sentence, and I think the forum will benefit.

I will submit that you should adhere to your own suggestions.   Better yet, make your all of your entire posts monosyllabic words.  One word per post.

Thanks!!  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.11  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1.8    5 months ago

Trump supporters are , by and large, brainwashed. 

Trump Is The Most Unpatriotic Presidential Candidate In American History

 
 
 
1stwarrior
3.1.12  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    5 months ago

"Your career on Newstalkers seems to be dedicated to making daily hate/idiotic detrains against President* Trump"

Looks much better and much more accurate John - sorry, but truth be told.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.13  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @3.1.12    5 months ago

Trump says the four democratic congresswomen are Un American. 

Trump sought and accepted help from an enemy nation to the United States to help him get elected president.  

When Putin said the US is not exceptional Trump did not disagree with Putin. He mealy mouthed approval of what Putin said. 

Trump publicly agreed with a communist dictator when that dictator attacked a former US vice president. 

The kicker is though, that Trump is no more American than these women are. His status as far as immigrant or native is EXACTLY like AOC.  Both had one immigrant parent and one native born parent. What the fuck is his basis or right to tell her "go back where you came from" ? 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.14  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.11    5 months ago
Trump supporters are , by and large, brainwashed. 

Quite the contrary.  We all have the ability to think independently and come to our own personal decisions.  Unlike the left who in some fashion continually spew the very same pabulum to support their positions and denigrate all others.

Trump Is The Most Unpatriotic Presidential Candidate In American History

Quite the contrary JR.  It was his predecessor that went on a global apology tour, castigating and chastising the United States of America for essentially all the good and great things THIS country did for the world.   

If I remember, it was also during his tenure that our military had to cannibalize some aircraft to keep other aircraft air worthy and capable.  

 
 
 
1stwarrior
3.1.15  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.13    5 months ago

"Trump sought and accepted help from an enemy nation to the United States to help him get elected president. "

Show your proof.  Obviously you think you know much more than what Mueller reported.

Proof please. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.16  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @3.1.15    5 months ago

He asked Russia to produce Hillary Clinton's private emails. Mueller said that. Where were you? 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.17  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.13    5 months ago
Trump says the four democratic congresswomen are Un American. 

One must surmise the truth hurts those on the left.

Trump sought and accepted help from an enemy nation to the United States to help him get elected president. 

Sorry JR, you have that wrong.  The loser Clinton was the one, with the aid of the DNC and some highly placed American officials that sought and paid for foreign help to get elected.  Fortunately, unsuccessfully. 

When Putin said the US is not exceptional Trump did not disagree with Putin. He mealy mouthed approval of what Putin said. 

I seem to remember this little exchange which some seem to forget:

“This is my last election ... After my election I have more flexibility,” Obama said, expressing confidence that he would win a second term.

“I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” said Medvedev, Putin’s protégé and long considered number two in Moscow’s power structure.

Trump publicly agreed with a communist dictator when that dictator attacked a former US vice president.

 Why would he not when it's a truthful statement?

The kicker is though, that Trump is no more American than these women are. His status as far as immigrant or native is EXACTLY like AOC.  Both had one immigrant parent and one native born parent. What the fuck is his basis or right to tell her "go back where you came from" ? 

No John, the "kicker" is, he is MUCH MORE American than those women.  He has a love on THIS country that those women don't, never will, and will never understand.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.18  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.16    5 months ago
He asked Russia to produce Hillary Clinton's private emails. Mueller said that. Where were you? 

Actually, this is what he said:

“By the way, if they hacked, they probably have her 33,000 emails,” Trump said. “I hope they do. They probably have her 33,000 emails that she lost and deleted. Because you’d see some beauties there.”
“I will tell you this: Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” he said. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

He was simply asking for them to provide the EVIDENCE of Clintons illegal actions.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.19  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1.17    5 months ago
No John, the "kicker" is, he is MUCH MORE American than those women.  He has a love on THIS country that those women don't, never will, and will never understand.

You have no idea whether or not that is true. You are just mouthing right wing propaganda. It is not unAmerican to criticize America from the left any more so than it is to criticize it from the right. 

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez wants a better life for the working class people of the United States. There is nothing un American about that. Republicans and conservatives generally oppose workers having unions. I call that un American. 

Trump has repeatedly shown ignorance of US laws, or disagreement with US laws. He has called an entire federal district court unAmerican. He's so stupid he didnt even know that Puerto Ricans are Americans.   He's not a true patriot, he's a joke patriot. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.20  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.19    5 months ago
You have no idea whether or not that is true. You are just mouthing right wing propaganda. It is not unAmerican to criticize America from the left any more so than it is to criticize it from the right. 

When you call for the complete dismantling of a law enforcement agency that's not criticism.  When you claim this country is running CONCENTRATION CAMPS, that's not criticism.

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez wants a better life for the working class people of the United States. There is nothing un American about that. Republicans and conservatives generally oppose workers having unions. I call that un American. 

If she wants a better life for the working class people, why then does she not work for the people that elected her?  She's apparently more sympathetic to the people breaking the laws of this country than she is to the people that actually put her into office.  Hell, she's spent more time on the southern border than she has in her own district.

Trump has repeatedly shown ignorance of US laws, or disagreement with US laws. He has called an entire federal district court unAmerican. He's so stupid he didnt even know that Puerto Ricans are Americans.   He's not a true patriot, he's a joke patriot. 

Oh, I'm quite sure he know's Puerto Ricans are citizens.  Interestingly while Puerto Ricans enjoy citizenship, and Puerto Rico enjoys many of the trappings of being American, the vast majority don't contribute to the finances of this country, while they do accept the checks headed their way.  

As to "knowing" what is true or not, you John, are not the one to chastise anyone here.  You're so blinded by you abject hatred of Donald Trump and any that support him or his policies, you wouldn't know the truth if you were chewing on it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.21  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1.20    5 months ago

The people who support Trump and Trumpism in the face of a daily mountain of evidence against him are the "blinded" ones. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.22  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    5 months ago
Your career on Newstalkers seems to be dedicated to making daily excuses for President* Trump.

While your career on Newstalkers seems to be dedicated to making daily "I Hate Trump" comments and seeding articles to exhibit that.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.23  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.21    5 months ago
The people who support Trump and Trumpism in the face of a daily mountain of evidence against him are the "blinded" ones. 

Evidence?  As supplied by you, VOX and every other radical left leaning, progressive, socialist site on the internet?

What's amazing is that when challenged to provide proof, you run away or simply cut and paste some more drivel and balderdash from another Trump hating pabulum spewing far left radical site.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
3.1.24  JohnRussell  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1.23    5 months ago

It is very easy to find evidence against Trump. 

Trumpsters dont care about evidence.  I'm not going to hop around like a monkey just to amuse Trumpsters. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.25  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.24    5 months ago
It is very easy to find evidence against Trump.

When challenged to do so, you never have.   So, jump around however you want.  It's actually amusing, so I need to thank you for the laughs.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
3.1.26  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.24    5 months ago

But you play the part so well jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jasper2529
3.1.27  Jasper2529  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.24    5 months ago
It is very easy to find evidence against Trump. 

I've been on tenterhooks for months waiting for "evidence" that no one, not even Mueller, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, et al, have been able to provide. How long must I wait? 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
3.1.28  XDm9mm  replied to  Jasper2529 @3.1.27    5 months ago
I've been on tenterhooks for months waiting for "evidence" that no one, not even Mueller, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, et al, have been able to provide. How long must I wait? 

Uhmmm.....   till hell freezes over?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.29  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    5 months ago

The traitors are those who won't accept election results and tried to remove a President from office. Still no thoughts on anything in the article?  Yesterday I found out that even if the seeder/author discusses a topic, she gets to declare it Off Topic later! 

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.30  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.29    5 months ago

So the millions (almost 3 million more than the turd of a 'president' received) of people who voted for Hillary are traitors?  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.31  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.4    5 months ago
Would that normalcy be Koch brothers normalcy or John Birch Society normalcy ? 

I got a feeling you don't know much about either. Normalcy involves all the decent Americans living between the east coast slums and the west coast homeless communities.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.32  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.30    5 months ago

Shall I do what you did yesterday?   Ok, Hillary and Trump are now off topic!

You discussed something, then declared it off topic and found a moderator to go along with it

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.1.33  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  Jasper2529 @3.1.27    5 months ago
I've been on tenterhooks for months waiting for "evidence" that no one, not even Mueller, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, et al, have been able to provide. How long must I wait? 
As far as the "foreign intervention " goes , I find it ironic that the freedom of the press in the first amendment is mostly to blame , Some outside press agency posts /reports something , and it gets picked up by our own media and press and reported here , and its NOT suppose to affect what people think about what is reported?
 As far as im concerned , the US media is complicent, the evidence is in their own coverage and reporting.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.1.34  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.30    5 months ago
So the millions (almost 3 million more than the turd of a 'president' received) of people who voted for Hillary are traitors?

Nope I don't consider them traitors , those 3 million more votes just happened to be in places that it didn't effect the assignment of available electors in the electoral college .

every single vote that Hillary garnered counted towards the electors where the votes were cast.

basic High School US government class stuff.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
3.1.35  Jasper2529  replied to  XDm9mm @3.1.28    5 months ago
Uhmmm.....   till hell freezes over?

That's accurate. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.36  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.32    5 months ago

Cry me a fucking river Vic

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.37  Tessylo  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.1.34    5 months ago

Blah blah fucking blah.  I wasn't talking to you 

 
 
 
Texan1211
3.1.38  Texan1211  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.1.34    5 months ago
basic High School US government class stuff.

Sometimes it simply isn't appreciated when you try to educate people on how elections are really conducted.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.39  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.36    5 months ago

It dosen't work that way for me. If I comment on something I don't get to later say it's off topic. I bet if I took that to someone, she would overturn it.

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.40  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.39    5 months ago

jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.41  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.40    5 months ago

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
luther28
4  luther28    5 months ago

In America, if you hate our Country, you are free to leave.

The love it or leave it defense, a redux from the sixties. I do not believe that they hate our Country, more along the lines of improving what they see as injustice.

Whether one agrees with what one says or not, they are also free to say what they may, as are we all. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  luther28 @4    5 months ago
I do not believe that they hate our Country

I beg to differ!

more along the lines of improving what they see as injustice.

Like elevating one race over another?

Whether one agrees with what one says or not, they are also free to say what they may, as are we all. 

So is Donald Trump!!!

 
 
 
luther28
4.1.1  luther28  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    5 months ago
Whether one agrees with what one says or not, they are also free to say what they may, as are we all. So is Donald Trump!!!

Yup, even Mr. Trump.

more along the lines of improving what they see as injustice.

Like elevating one race over another?

Nope, just going about what they deem correct.

I do not believe that they hate our Country

I beg to differ!

I suppose only they can answer that question.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  luther28 @4.1.1    5 months ago
I suppose only they can answer that question.

They have

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
4.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  luther28 @4    5 months ago

was love it or leave it racist?

 
 
 
luther28
4.2.1  luther28  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2    5 months ago

Nope, just a knee jerk reaction to those that differed on an opinion that ultimately proved correct.

 
 
 
luther28
4.2.2  luther28  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2    5 months ago

Republican support for Trump rises after racially charged tweets

No but the fan base seems to be embracing this incarnation of it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.2.3  JohnRussell  replied to  luther28 @4.2.2    5 months ago

He could get 100% Of Republican support and still lose if the rest of the country is unified against him. 

 
 
 
XDm9mm
4.2.4  XDm9mm  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.3    5 months ago
still lose if the rest of the country is unified against him.

Possibly.  If memory serves me, one Hillary Clinton thought the same thing.  And we all know the outcome of that.  By the way, has anyone run across Hillary wandering in the woods lately?

 
 
 
luther28
4.2.5  luther28  replied to  XDm9mm @4.2.4    5 months ago
still lose if the rest of the country is unified against him.
Possibly.  If memory serves me, one Hillary Clinton thought the same thing.  And we all know the outcome of that.

That one is difficult to argue.

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.2.6  Texan1211  replied to  luther28 @4.2.2    5 months ago

Has it ever occurred to you that MAYBE the support is a reaction to the over-the-top, hypocritical, insane, melodramatic responses to his tweets?

 
 
 
luther28
4.2.7  luther28  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.6    5 months ago

While everything that occurs these days from both sides seems to be shrouded in drama, real or imagined offence, hypocrisy and hyperbole, the tweets were both vile and not required.

The Dems were on the verge of self destruction, all he had to do was sit back shut his mouth ( or thumbs ) and allow it to reach its conclusion. All he seems to have accomplished is to unify them and make his path all the more difficult. 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4.2.8  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  luther28 @4.2.7    5 months ago

personally I think they are ALL( both parties) a bunch of braying jackasses that have no public speaking abilities....

 
 
 
Raven Wing
4.2.9  Raven Wing  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.2.8    5 months ago

Totally agree!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.2.10  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  luther28 @4.2.2    5 months ago
No but the fan base seems to be embracing this incarnation of it.

Link please

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.2.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.3    5 months ago
He could get 100% Of Republican support and still lose if the rest of the country is unified against him. 

How many fuckin liberals do you think there are?

 
 
 
Jasper2529
4.2.12  Jasper2529  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.11    5 months ago

Seems that some haven't learned and are still hoping/relying on making the popular vote the factor for presidential elections. They still believe that electing a POTUS is the same as electing a prom king/queen.

 
 
 
luther28
4.2.13  luther28  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.2.8    5 months ago

Pretty much

 
 
 
luther28
4.2.14  luther28  replied to  Raven Wing @4.2.9    5 months ago

Yup

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.2.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Jasper2529 @4.2.12    5 months ago

If only they could get all of those "voters" out in CA to really make an impact!

 
 
 
luther28
4.2.16  luther28  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.10    5 months ago

Republican support for Trump rises after racially charged tweets ...


21 hours ago -   Support   for U.S. President Donald   Trump increased   slightly among Republicans   after   he lashed out on   Twitter   over the weekend in a   racially charged   attack on four minority Democratic congresswomen, a Reuters/Ipsos public opinion poll shows.   ...   Trump , who is seeking re-election next ...

GOP support for Trump rises after tweets attacking congresswomen: Poll


10 hours ago -   Support   for U.S. President Donald   Trump increased   slightly among Republicans   after   he lashed out on   Twitter   over the weekend in a   racially charged   attack on four minority Democratic congresswomen, a Reuters/Ipsos public opinion poll shows.   ... His net approval — the percentage who ...
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.2.17  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  luther28 @4.2.16    5 months ago

Thanks Luther for backing up an opinion. Those numbers were rising and I believe they are rising because people are seeing and hearing the liberal democrats. Please keep them talking!

 
 
 
r.t..b...
4.2.18  r.t..b...  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.6    5 months ago
MAYBE the support is a reaction to the over-the-top, hypocritical, insane, melodramatic responses to his tweets?

If so, what does that say about his supporters, other than a shared disdain for everything and everyone subject to the divisiveness  openly expressed in his tweets. He is not the problem, he is the but the voice that his supporters have longed for. He has astutely capitalized on their fear and ignorance in disrupting the comfort of the status quo, regardless of the legitimate concerns of those who will never know the same level of comfort.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.2.19  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  r.t..b... @4.2.18    5 months ago
the status quo

The same status quo we see on campus and in the biased media that lied to us for three years. I'd say the average American is a lot wiser than you give them credit for.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
4.2.20  Mark in Wyoming  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.11    5 months ago

last I saw a couple years ago was Reps made up around 25-28 % of the voters , dems between 28-32% leaving the rest as independent voters not tied to any party affiliation, but having the same as the 2 major parties , liberal moderate and conservative factions , neither major party would win without convincing those independents to vote their way. fact of life actually , even the what passes as dems cant win if the others unify against them.

 
 
 
r.t..b...
4.2.21  r.t..b...  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.19    5 months ago
I'd say the average American is a lot wiser than you give them credit for.

I hope you are right, Vic. Perhaps a break from the daily grinder on NT is in order. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
5  Sean Treacy    5 months ago

breaking rules and rewriting the rule book to avoid accountability.  

And Democrats complain about trump...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
5.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    5 months ago
breaking rules and rewriting the rule book to avoid accountability.  

That's their MO, be it Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi or the liberal judges that have been blocking Trump.

 
 
 
cms5
6  cms5    5 months ago

While I believe Trump definitely could have handled his tweet differently...he has shown all of America the nature of the beast that calls themselves the Democratic Party.

The 'squad' now believe that they can whip anyone into complete control....after all, they got Pelosi to use harsh words and lie about it. When caught, changing the rules is the answer. This group of little merry lawmakers would rather complain than create a comprehensive immigration policy that would end any type of cruelty they claim occurs. Blame Trump, blame the org that is tasked with ensuring laws are complied with...sit back and complain some more. If anyone disagrees...yell RACIST...anti-woman of color...whatever suits you.

Manufactured Crisis....oh wait, there really is a crisis! Blame Trump! Blame ICE! Blame CBP!

Yes, Trump could do things differently...but showing the underbelly of the Dems seemed to be more fun.

 
 
 
XDm9mm
6.1  XDm9mm  replied to  cms5 @6    5 months ago
he has shown all of America the nature of the beast that calls themselves the Democratic Party.

BRAVO!!!!

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
7  Buzz of the Orient    5 months ago

I thought the article was about Pelosi and what she said/did, but as I read through the comments it seems that the whole discussion was off topic.  Seems to me that John* (asterisk intended) led that discussion.  Eh Hombre?  

 
 
 
WallyW
7.1  WallyW  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @7    5 months ago

Thankfully, only a handful of people pay any attention to this left wing hate site

 
 
 
It Is ME
8  It Is ME    5 months ago

"The problem was the rules of the House forbid it."

What are Rules to the "Left" anyway ?

"ILLEGAL" is the Great and Powerful "Legal" now.

 
 
 
Texan1211
8.1  Texan1211  replied to  It Is ME @8    5 months ago

Democrats seem mighty fond of rules.

Until they decide they don't like those rules being applied to THEM.

 
 
 
It Is ME
8.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  Texan1211 @8.1    5 months ago

Rules are just a thingy to be broken for "Self Indulgence" by the "Dimbulbs". jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

That's why we have so many folks in Jail to this day …. and it keeps growing ! After all, the "Left" keep lifting up the "Common Folk" to be like them ! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jasper2529
9  Jasper2529    5 months ago
"There is no place anywhere for the president's words, which are not only divisive, but dangerous -- and have legitimized and increased fear and hatred of new Americans and people of color
Ms. Pelosi seems to be unaware or deliberately obtuse/lying when she refers to ILLEGAL ALIENS as "new Americans".  
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
10  Sean Treacy    5 months ago

So it appears Democrats believe racism is not offensive.  They just went on record that they don't think anyone  should be offended by being called a racist.

 
 
 
It Is ME
11  It Is ME    5 months ago

Nancy Pelosi (D) = I was told I could use those words (LIED).

Steny Hoyer (D) = NO YOU CAN'T (TRUTH)!

it was GREAT !

To bad they voted to let Nancy speak again, but what are "Rules" really for anyway. jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Nerm_L
12  Nerm_L    5 months ago

What is fascinating is the absence of the Democratic Presidential candidates.  Seems like a perfect opportunity for the Democratic candidates to parade in front of the cameras denouncing Trump to get free face time.  Since the mantra has been to defeat Trump, this episode should have been Gravy Train that makes its own gravy.

So, where are the Presidential candidates?

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

jungkonservativ111
CB
Tacos!


27 visitors