╌>

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  5 years ago  •  37 comments


The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered
I wrote and edited for the Family Research Council, a public advocacy organization that promoted the principles I have cared about since childhood: protecting the family, promoting the dignity of every human life and advocating for religious liberty. It reads like a tagline, but it’s also just what I believed and the way I chose to match my career with my convictions.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



I’ll never forget the moment I learned we were on lockdown. It was Aug.15, 2012. My frustration mingled with fear. Trapped on the sixth floor, we knew someone had been shot. We knew we couldn’t leave yet. We knew little else.

While I was missing lunch, a crime scene played out in the office lobby below me. My coworker and friend Leo wasn’t armed, but he had played the quick-thinking and inadvertent hero, disarming a young man on a mission to kill me and as many of my colleagues as possible . The gunman had packed his backpack with ammo and 15 Chick-fil-A sandwiches — later admitting that he had planned to smear them on our lifeless faces as a political statement. Leo took a bullet in the arm but managed to hold the attacker until law enforcement arrived.

I wrote and edited for the Family Research Council , a public advocacy organization that promoted the principles I have cared about since childhood: protecting the family, promoting the dignity of every human life and advocating for religious liberty. It reads like a tagline, but it’s also just what I believed and the way I chose to match my career with my convictions.

I never expected that everyone would celebrate or share my beliefs. But I did expect to be able to discuss and debate these differences without becoming a political target in an act of terrorism, the first conviction under Washington, D.C.’s 2002 Anti-Terrorism Act.

The Southern Poverty Law Center labeled us a 'hate group'


It was the type of violent incident that one could expect a group that purportedly monitors “hate,” like the Southern Poverty Law Center, to notice, research and decry. In fact, we were on the center’s radar but for all the wrong reasons. The assailant acknowledged later in FBI testimony that he had selected our office precisely because the SPLC had labeled my employer a “hate group.”

It has always been easier to smear people rather than wrestle with their ideas. It’s a bully who calls names and spreads lies rather than thoroughly reading a brief’s legal arguments or challenging the rationale underlying a policy proposal. The SPLC has chosen to take the easy path — to intimidate and mislead for raw political power and financial benefit.

For years, former employees revealed, local journalists reported  and commentators have lamented: The Southern Poverty Law Center is not what it claims to be. Not a pure-hearted, clear-headed legal advocate for the vulnerable, but rather an obscenely wealthy marketing scheme. For years, the left-wing interest group has used its “hate group” list to promote the fiction that violent neo-Nazis and Christian nonprofits peacefully promoting orthodox beliefs about marriage and sex are indistinguishable. Sometimes, it has apologized to public figures  it has smeared, and it recently paid out millions to settle a threatened defamation lawsuit .

The SPLC has its own troubles


These shameful secrets are no longer hidden in shadows. The New York Times , Politico , NPR and a host of other mainstream publications are reporting on the corruption and widening credibility gap. The SPLC dismissed its co-founder in March, and its president has resigned amidst numerous claims of sexual harassment, gender discrimination and racism within the organization — a parade of disgraces that vividly force the conclusion: The SPLC is hollow, rotten and failing at the very virtues it pretends to celebrate.

The criticism comes from many corners. There’s the Current Affairs editor who seems sympathetic to the center’s progressive mission but decries its “hate group” list as an “outright fraud” and a “willful deception designed to scare older liberals into writing checks to the SPLC.” 

There’s the retired investigative journalist who helped research and write an eight-part series on the center’s “litany of problems and questionable practices” in the mid-1990s . His Washington Post opinion piece reads with a thinly veiled message: We nearly got a Pulitzer Prize for TELLING YOU SO. 

But perhaps most damning of all are the indictments leveled by former employee Bob Moser in The New Yorker . He remembers being welcomed to the “Poverty Palace” and recounts the heart-sinking reality of it all — being “pawns” in a “highly profitable scam.”

Jobs and years have passed, and I work now for Alliance Defending Freedom . ADF ranks among “ the top performing firm(s) " litigating First Amendment cases, according to the Empirical SCOTUS blog, and is the “ Christian legal powerhouse that keeps winning at the Supreme Court ,” according to The Washington Post. 

And yes, my new employer has also attracted one of the SPLC’s spurious hate labels . The label easily peels and fades away when one actually does the research and listens to truth before deciding to troll.

I won't be intimidated by the SPLC 


If the SPLC thought that its hate would intimidate or silence me and my colleagues, they’re sadly mistaken. I’m lucky — blessed, really — that I didn’t take a bullet for my beliefs back in 2012. But the center’s ugly slander and the gunman’s misguided attack have sharpened my resolve and deepened my faith in my Savior, who commands my destiny and shields me from the schemes of man. The same is true for my colleagues.

Fifty-one years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. fell to an assassin’s bullet. The SPLC pretends to carry his legacy but weaponizes hate labels instead. Unlike SPLC's name-calling, Dr. King’s words and vision stand the test of time. “Injustice anywhere,” he warned , “is a threat to justice everywhere.”

The SPLC, as an institution, has thoroughly disqualified itself as an arbiter of justice. But this country would be a better place if the center’s donors, lawyers and friends would truly believe and apply Dr. King’s legacy — his peaceful pursuit of justice and his love of neighbor.

Jessica Prol Smith is senior news writer and editor for Alliance Defending Freedom.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    5 years ago

But perhaps most damning of all are the indictments leveled by former employee Bob Moser in The New Yorker. He remembers being welcomed to the “Poverty Palace” and recounts the heart-sinking reality of it all — being “pawns” in a “highly profitable scam.”

Oberlin bakery owner: Gibson's Bakery paid a high cost for an unfairly damaged reputation

Jobs and years have passed, and I work now forAlliance Defending Freedom. ADF ranks among “the top performing firm(s)" litigating First Amendment cases, according to the Empirical SCOTUS blog, and is the “Christian legal powerhouse that keeps winning at the Supreme Court,” according to The Washington Post. 

And yes, my new employer has also attracted one of the SPLC’s spurious hate labels. The label easily peels and fades away when one actually does the research and listens to truth before deciding to troll.

I Won't Be Intimidated By The SPLC 

If the SPLC thought that its hate would intimidate or silence me and my colleagues, they’re sadly mistaken. I’m lucky — blessed, really — that I didn’t take a bullet for my beliefs back in 2012. But the center’s ugly slander and the gunman’s misguided attack have sharpened my resolve and deepened my faith in my Savior, who commands my destiny and shields me from the schemes of man. The same is true for my colleagues.

Fifty-one years ago, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. fell to an assassin’s bullet. The SPLC pretends to carry his legacy but weaponizes hate labels instead. Unlike SPLC's name-calling, Dr. King’s words and vision stand the test of time. “Injustice anywhere,” he warned, “is a threat to justice everywhere.”

The SPLC, as an institution, has thoroughly disqualified itself as an arbiter of justice.   https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/6775/the-southern-poverty-law-center-is-a-hate-based-scam-that-nearly-caused-me-to-be-murdered

 
 
 
Don Overton
Sophomore Quiet
1.1  Don Overton  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    5 years ago

It's really hard to try and read through such stupid comments and lie

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Don Overton @1.1    5 years ago

Don’t like it, don’t read it, no problem.  What exactly in her personal experience of surviving an SPLC inspired terrorist attack is she lying about?  

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2  Buzz of the Orient    5 years ago

It's a good thing I'm incognito or because of how I feel about the SPLC my name could be on their hate list as well.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2    5 years ago

Me too I’m sure since I’m a current supporter of and recent donor to both the Family Research Council and Alliance Defending Freedom and agree with both well over 90% of the time.  I think that they are fine organizations and it’s ridiculous that people who are supposed to be intelligent buy into the bigoted hate list of the terrorist hate group SPLC.  Some just want to believe... 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    5 years ago

Me three. There is a reason why they do it. Brit Hume said it well: "In fact, no country on earth has done more to overcome racial prejudice both in law and practice. Indeed, racism today is nearly universally rejected in America, which is why the left tries so hard to pin the label on its political opponents."

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3  Dismayed Patriot    5 years ago

So if you label something negatively like The FRC as a "hate group" and some radical attempts to act on that label, that means you "caused" the radicals violence as he headline claims? So what if you label a group of people "rapists"? What if you label them an "infestation" and some radical acts on those labels and shoots more than a dozen innocent people? I guess that means you "caused" their murder, right?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3    5 years ago

The author of the USA Today article was quite clear in what she said and I agree with her.  If the domestic terrorist had been successful in the completion of his mission she may well have not survived it.  What I’m doing openly thanks to the former Family Research Council and present Alliance Defending Freedom employee/author questioning the legitimacy of the SPLC label and the intelligence of all who act based on it.  The SPLC is a fraud, a racist, misogynistic organization, a fund raising scam artist agency and terrorist inspiring.  It had no legitimacy whatsoever and is worthy only of sheer and utter contempt.  

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  cjcold  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    5 years ago

[DELETED]

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  Ronin2  replied to  cjcold @3.1.1    5 years ago

Funny how the left seems to label anything or anyone that doesn't completely agree with their orthodoxy a hate group.

The SPLC has been sued repeatedly; you would think they would have learned by now.

Southern Poverty Law Center apologized and agreed Monday to a settlement of $3.375 million to Maajid Nawaz's Quilliam Foundation after admitting to falsely labeling his advocacy organization as "extremist."

Nawaz, a former British politician who has railed against Islamic extremism and the false use of the Koran to incite violence around the globe, and Quilliam were incorrectly characterized and listed in the SPLC's "A Journalist's Manual: Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists."

Nawaz, 40, announced the suit against SPLC in June of last year, and the organization admitted in its apology that it altered its position after several "human rights advocates affiliated with the United Nations" praised Nawaz's work.

Also, a leader of the SPLC, Heidi Beirich, was quoted during a speech as saying that Nawaz wanted mosques surveilled and that in turn meant "his opinion is that all Muslims are potential terrorists."

But the SPLC pulled back on its criticism of Nawaz after nearly a year.

The SPLC targeted Glen Keith Allen over his former ties to the National Alliance (NA), a white nationalist group. In doing so, the liberal group allegedly violated laws and legal codes of conduct by receiving and then paying for stolen documents in violation of confidentiality agreements. The group went after Allen with the intent of getting him fired by the city of Baltimore and permanently destroying his future prospects. Allen's suit claims that the SPLC should have its 501c3 tax-exempt status revoked, that it owes him restitution for racketeering, and that it should pay $6.5 million in damages. It also references Allen's pro bono work on behalf of African-Americans and his mentorship of an African-American teen, powerfully rebutting claims that he is a racist. Allen told PJ Media he now regrets his NA support, and an African-American friend of his laughed at the idea of this lawyer being branded a racist.

The lawsuit stems from an August 2016 article by SPLC Intelligence Project Director Heidi Beirich which described Allen as a " neo-Nazi lawyer " due to his former membership with the NA and suggested that his work for the Baltimore city solicitor involving a lawsuit filed by a black man who had been wrongly accused of murder was racially motivated and malicious. As part of his job with the solicitor, Beirich "filed one specific motion to help the city in a lawsuit filed by a black man who was wrongly accused of murder," O'Neil writes. "Beirich painted this work as malicious to African-Americans." Beirich's article prompted Baltimore's law department to immediately fire Allen, who had been hired just a few months earlier after leaving international law firm DLA Piper.

As part of the evidence for the article, Beirich publicized documents the suit says the SPLC obtained illegally, violating non-disclosure agreements and using an alleged "paid informant" to obtain them. The suit also accuses Beirich of smearing the American Eagle Party, which is described as racist and anti-Semitic in the article. It also accuses the SPLC of using its resources in a way that violates political campaigning restrictions for tax-exempt groups.

"The SPLC should also lose its tax-exempt status for mail and wire fraud, false statements on its tax forms, and campaigns of destruction and defamation against its perceived enemies, the lawsuit claims," O'Neil reports, noting that the suit "includes no fewer than nine counts against the defendants, so even if one or more fail, it would be very difficult for the SPLC to convince the court to dismiss the case."

Allen does not deny being a member of the white nationalist NA, which endorses racist and anti-Semitic ideologies, but says he's since renounced it. "My affiliation with the National Alliance was a mistake, one of the greatest of my life," Allen told PJ Media. "I would like to believe we live in a society where people can learn from their mistakes and move on."

O'Neil underscores that "Americans will rightly view" the National Alliance's ideas as "disgusting." "Even so, the rights of free association extend to all Americans, even those who wish to affiliate with such groups," he writes. "The law should protect NA's property and enforce its contracts."

Read the full report here .

The SPLC has been hit with a few significant lawsuits recently, including from Maajid Nawaz, whom the group labeled an "anti-Muslim extremist," along with Ayaan Hirsi Ali. In June, the group settled with Nawaz, paying $3.375 million to his Quilliam Foundation after admitting to smearing him. Dozens of other individuals and groups that have been similarly labeled as "extremist" by the SPLC are considering taking legal action.

As many as 60 Christian or conservative organizations attacked as "hate groups" by the Southern Poverty Law Center are considering legal action against the Left-wing group.
 
Mat Staver, chairman of Liberty Counsel, told PJ Media he thinks, "a number of organizations have been considering filing lawsuits against the SPLC," after the SPLC agreed to pay a $3.375 million settlement to Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz and his organization the Quilliam Foundation for branding them a "hate group"  in its 2016  "Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists."

The case is brought pursuant to the federal RICO statute because Cohen and Beirich have been carrying out their scheme to destroy CIS through the SPLC "enterprise" for two years and will not stop without judicial intervention. "CIS does not hate immigrants or anyone else" said CIS Executive Director Mark Krikorian. "Our purpose is to make the case for a pro-immigrant policy of lower immigration – fewer immigrants but a warmer welcome for those admitted. SPLC attacks us simply because it disagrees with these policy views. SPLC and its leaders have every right to oppose our work on immigration, but they do not have the right to label us a hate group and suggest we are racists. The Center for Immigration Studies is fighting back against the SPLC smear campaign and its attempt to stifle debate through intimidation and name-calling."

The complaint makes clear that SPLC knows CIS does not meet its own definition of a "hate group," which SPLC describes as an organization whose "official statements or principles... attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics." ( Complaint, ¶14, quoting from SPLC’s website ) CIS has not attacked or maligned immigrants. Moreover, the Supreme Court has held that being an immigrant is not an immutable characteristic because it is the result of a personal choice. (Plyler v. Doe, 487 U.S. 202, 220 (1982).) CIS regularly opposes higher levels of immigration for sound public policy reasons, not because of any animus toward immigrants as human beings. CIS hopes this lawsuit will cause Mr. Cohen and Ms. Beirich to turn their attention to actual cases of racial animus.

Since the IRS will not act to reign in SPLC; maybe they can be sued into extinction.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.2    5 years ago

Great post and the final conclusion is correct.  

 
 
 
Don Overton
Sophomore Quiet
3.1.4  Don Overton  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    5 years ago

The ignorance of that comment just glares

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Don Overton @3.1.4    5 years ago

My statement is 100% correct. It is the SPLC that is the ignorance here.  

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
3.1.7  Willjay9  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.2    5 years ago

Umm...you do realize you only listed ONE peraon who has sued the SPLC right?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.8  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Willjay9 @3.1.7    5 years ago

Actually that’s not true.  There have been many who have sued the evil wicked human debris that is the terrorist inspiring hate group SPLC.  Several are underway and others being filed every so often.  

 
 
 
Willjay9
Freshman Silent
3.1.9  Willjay9  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.8    5 years ago

Dude i can sue a ham sandwich.....doesnt mean it will get anywhere!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.10  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Willjay9 @3.1.9    5 years ago

Many of these suits will be as successful as the one with the settlement.  We will destroy the SPLC   Via these suits against their despicable behavior.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
3.2  Jack_TX  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3    5 years ago
So if you label something negatively like The FRC as a "hate group" and some radical attempts to act on that label, that means you "caused" the radicals violence as he headline claims?   So what if you label a group of people "rapists"? What if you label them an "infestation" and some radical acts on those labels and shoots more than a dozen innocent people? I guess that means you "caused" their murder, right?

You noticed that, did you?  

It is an interesting situation.  It would seem to me that either they're ALL responsible or NONE of them are responsible.  

But that's entirely too reasonable an idea to be accepted in America these days.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
3.3  Drakkonis  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3    5 years ago
So if you label something negatively like The FRC as a "hate group" and some radical attempts to act on that label, that means you "caused" the radicals violence as he headline claims?

Are you unaware that many of the Democrats in Congress are going on and on about what so and so said is to blame for an act of violence they did not participate in? Anyone who doesn't toe the democratic line is accused of inciting the violence. Rather than engage in dialogue with those who disagree with them, they just label them haters and inciters of violence. Then, when anything happens, they blame them for it. 

In the case of the FRC, we see an extreme example of this. The SPLC is a left wing hit squad that has little to do with justice. Anyone without a political ax to grind knows the FRC is not a hate group. Yet the SLPC, which used to stand for something, labels them as a hate group and some sucker believes them. Then we get this. So, when the perp says they specifically chose their target because the SPLC painted a target on them, then, yeah, they caused the violence. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Drakkonis @3.3    5 years ago

Well said and right on.  Only intellectual midgets and bigots would call FRC or ADF a hate group.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    5 years ago

The SPLC is one of the  more successful conjobs in history. It's essentially scared white liberals into donating millions and millions of dollars into funding the lavish lifestyle  of a former Klan lawyer who realized that the real money was to be made on the other side.  It's really sort of amusing, liberals scared by the ever growing list of  laughable, often imaginary "hate groups" of giving money to an organization that discriminated against its own black employees and sexually  harassed it's females.  Instead of "fighting the Klan" gullible liberals  sent their money to sit in off shore bank accounts or to fund the settlements towards the people the SPLC itself abused.  Jim and Tammy Faye Baker could have learned alot from Morris Dees.

It's almost funny till you are reminded the evil that their propaganda can cause, by gullible progressives who take the SPLC seriously and too dumb to realize they are being scammed.

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
5  JumpDrive    5 years ago

The FRC promotes lies about LGBT people like “one of the primary goals of the homosexual rights movement is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the ‘prophets’ of a new sexual order.” The FRC also supported draconian Ugandan laws pushed by US ’christian’ ‘missionaries’ that proposed that “Individuals or companies that promote LGBT rights would be fined or imprisoned, or both”, as well as a variety of other extreme penalties.

Blaming the SPLC for labelling the FRC a hate group is like blaming a map-maker for the shape of Texas. It is what it is.
——————————————

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JumpDrive @5    5 years ago
“one of the primary goals of the homosexual rights movement is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the ‘prophets’ of a new sexual order

Using quotes from the last century to call a group a "hate group."

So  the Democratic Party is a hate group, per the SPLC.  

 
 
 
Don Overton
Sophomore Quiet
5.1.1  Don Overton  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1    5 years ago

Comments of lies and bullshit

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Don Overton @5.1.1    5 years ago

Arglebargle or foofarraw?

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
5.1.3  JumpDrive  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1    5 years ago

So, 1999 it too long ago... Here’s a current example from FRC.org wrt SOGI laws (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity).

SOGI laws:
1) are not justified in principle;
2) are invasive and cause tangible harms; and
3) are coercive and cannot be reconciled with religious liberty.

1) might as well read blah, blah, blah. It’s just noise
2) is a lie, how does gay marriage or someone being transgendered have any real effect on anyone else?
3) is hysterical. Because they believe one of the 4,000+ fantasies we refer to as religions, they should be allowed to discriminate. How can you be fine with having protection for beliefs, but not fine with having protection from beliefs?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sean Treacy @5.1.2    5 years ago

Just let him ride his broom 🧹 and move on...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JumpDrive @5.1.3    5 years ago

All three are factually true and I personally stand by them.  Essentially I am an extension of every conservative and evangelical Christian group that the SPLC has labeled hate over political and ideological differences.  If the SPLC Targets 🎯 a like minded group as hate I will affiliate with that group because the bigoted haters at SPLC did it.  It is a way of expressing sheer and utter contempt for any and all organizations that use their hate list for any reason.  The SPLC truly sucks as does it’s organization and membership.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
5.1.6  Jack_TX  replied to  JumpDrive @5.1.3    5 years ago
how does gay marriage or someone being transgendered have any real effect on anyone else?

It doesn't....until.....

Until a boy who identifies as a girl wants to use the girls' locker room, where the actual girls are required to undress in front of him or fail their physical education classes.

Other than that, it doesn't.

And frankly, the solution to that problem is to start to treat P.E. like a real class instead of something for the football coach to do during the day until practice starts.  You know....move it out of 1950 and into the digital age where we teach kids how to eat right and use their Fitbits while assigning workouts for homework.

But that won't happen, because public schools are first and foremost about "we've done it this way since 1924".

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Jack_TX @5.1.6    5 years ago

Your usual nonsense 

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
5.1.8  Jack_TX  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.7    5 years ago
Your usual nonsense 

Ah.  That must mean I'm right again.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.9  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Don Overton @5.1.1    5 years ago

“Trapped on the sixth floor, we knew someone had been shot. We knew we couldn’t leave yet. We knew little else.

While I was missing lunch, a crime scene played out in the office lobby below me. My coworker and friend Leo wasn’t armed, but he had played the quick-thinking and inadvertent hero, disarming a young man on a mission to kill me and as many of my colleagues as possible. The gunman had packed his backpack with ammo and 15 Chick-fil-A sandwiches — later admitting that he had planned to smear them on our lifeless faces as a political statement. Leo took a bullet in the arm but managed to hold the attacker until law enforcement arrived.

I wrote and edited for the Family Research Council, a public advocacy organization that promoted the principles I have cared about since childhood: protecting the family, promoting the dignity of every human life and advocating for religious liberty. It reads like a tagline, but it’s also just what I believed and the way I chose to match my career with my convictions.

I never expected that everyone would celebrate or share my beliefs. But I did expect to be able to discuss and debate these differences without becoming a political target in an act of terrorism, the first conviction under Washington, D.C.’s 2002 Anti-Terrorism Act.

The Southern Poverty Law Center Labeled Us A 'Hate Group'

It was the type of violent incident that one could expect a group that purportedly monitors “hate,” like the Southern Poverty Law Center, to notice, research and decry. In fact, we were on the center’s radar but for all the wrong reasons. The assailant acknowledged later in FBI testimony that he had selected our office precisely because the SPLC had labeled my employer a “hate group.”

It has always been easier to smear people rather than wrestle with their ideas. It’s a bully who calls names and spreads liesrather than thoroughly reading a brief’s legal arguments or challenging the rationale underlying a policy proposal. The SPLC has chosen to take the easy path — to intimidate and mislead for raw political power and financial benefit.” https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/6775/the-southern-poverty-law-center-is-a-hate-based-scam-that-nearly-caused-me-to-be-murdered

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.10  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Jack_TX @5.1.8    5 years ago

It does in this case.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.11  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.7    5 years ago

It is the SPLC that is engaging in its usual nonsense. It’s who and what they are.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6  Tessylo    5 years ago

NOPE

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @6    5 years ago

Yep.  

 
 

Who is online



Outis
Thomas


73 visitors