╌>

Liberals Target Trump Supporters Businesses in Midwestern City to Get Them Shut Down

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  5 years ago  •  138 comments


Liberals Target Trump Supporters Businesses in Midwestern City to Get Them Shut Down
This year, the left has accused innocent kids of being evil racists, fabricated countless hate crimes to push a false narrative, and pushed the entire Democratic platform off the edge of insane leftist policy. If you don’t support extreme gun control, you’re evil. If you don’t hate President Trump, you’re evil. If you think that terrorists shouldn’t be running Middle Eastern countries, you’re evil. If you dare to have white skin or be a gender-binary male, you’re extra evil.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



It’s getting crazy. We’ve seen the cycle of rhetorical escalation for years. It felt like it was coming to a head in 2016. Now, we know that we were only seeing the beginning. This year, the left has accused innocent kids of being evil racists, fabricated countless hate crimes to push a false narrative, and pushed the entire Democratic platform off the edge of insane leftist policy.

If you don’t support extreme gun control, you’re evil. If you don’t hate President Trump, you’re evil. If you think that terrorists shouldn’t be running Middle Eastern countries, you’re evil. If you dare to have white skin or be a gender-binary male, you’re extra evil.

History tells us that when a group of fundamentalists gets riled up enough and starts to believe demonizing propaganda, they do truly horrific things. Anyone who thinks this can’t happen in America is sorely mistaken. Liberals in the Midwest just crossed a line that shows exactly how ready they are to tear this country apart.

Boycotts have been used by a lot of people for a lot of reasons throughout history. People who dislike Hobby Lobby’s health insurance policies choose to do business elsewhere. Likewise, many conservatives stopped purchasing Gillette in response to their recent ‘woke’ ad campaign.

We’ll skip the nuance in these two boycotts (there are big differences between them) and simply say that it’s fairly reasonable to try to shop with companies with which you philosophically agree. That’s all fine.

Boycotts have a darker side to them. A few classic examples of malicious boycotts can be found in the U.S. during the peak of McCarthyism or Germany in the 1930s and 40s.

The fundamental difference between these kinds of boycotts is the goal. If you boycotted Gillette, it’s probably because you don’t want to give money to a company that vilifies masculinity as evil. When the Germans boycotted Jewish businesses, it was to drive them to poverty. It wasn’t about principle. The goal was for the Jews, packed into ghettos, to starve to death. Keep that distinction in mind. 

Meanwhile in Pittsburgh

You probably already heard about actors Debra Messing and Eric McCormack asking for a blacklist for Hollywood Trump supporters. That’s already pretty bad, but what’s happening in Pittsburgh right now takes that extra step.

Left-wing activists have taken to social media to publish lists of every local business that has any association or tie with President Trump. The association could be in the form of a campaign donation, vocalizing their support for the President, or just being baselessly accused of sympathizing with Trump supporters. If someone in a shop wears a red hat, that’s enough to go on these black lists.

You can see how that’s flirting with the darker form of boycotts. The malice doesn’t wait for confirmation, and it’s aimed at someone for simply having a different politician opinion.

The problem is that it doesn’t stop here. The left-wing nut jobs in Pittsburgh aren’t satisfied with simply spending their money elsewhere. They have vandalized these shops and protested in front of storefronts. These boycotts are designed to intimidate customers into joining the boycott. They aren’t expressing an ideological difference with their wallets. They’re trying to destroy every local business that they affiliate with President Trump.

You understand the historical connection. You see why this is dangerous, wrong and illegal. Unfortunately, the rabid left can’t make those connections.

If you explain to them the history of Jewish boycotts, they’ll argue that it’s why they’re doing these boycotts. If only people had been as aggressive with Nazi businesses as Antifa, there wouldn’t have been a Holocaust. They’re actually that delusional, and that’s what you really need to take away from all of this.

Not a single member of the SS believed that they were the bad guys. You can see historical pictures. They smiled at Auschwitz because they believed they were ridding the world of evil. That’s how extremism works, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing today.

The left doesn’t want to convert you. To them, you are an infidel, a dirty Jew, an expendable, lower life form. They’ve spent years building this narrative, and it’s all so they can justify whatever means they decide are necessary to get rid of you.

They will come after your business and your livelihood, and whether that works or not, they’ll try to round you up. This is the unifying theme in all of their policy proposals, and it’s plainly evident in the actions of every leftist “protester.”

They’re trying to silence and divide you. Don’t let them. They are trying to bully and intimidate you. Stand strong. History is full of extremists vying for power. The difference between their success or failure in that endeavor is you.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    5 years ago

...Marilyn Synek loves the coffee and crepes at Cultiva Espresso & Crepes in Lincoln, Nebraska. Her weekly visits have become something of a tradition.

But on Wednesday, Synek tells me she was confronted by one of the employees who demanded that she leave the coffee shop because of her conservative beliefs.

“Marilyn Synek! I didn’t recognize you until now, but I just realized who you are, what you stand for, and the work you do. You are f------ bigoted trash, and we do not want you in our restaurant,” the irate employee shouted.

It’s true that Ms. Synek is a conservative. She is employed by the Nebraska Family Alliance. She is also active in local Republican politics.

“Over 80 percent of the people who work here are queer. You are not f------ wanted in our restaurant, so get out and don’t come back! If you do try to come back, we will all refuse any service to you,” the employee ranted.

Synek tells me she never told anyone about her political opinions in the coffee house. She just frequented the establishment because they made good crepes.

“I have always treated the employees of Cultiva with respect and courtesy,” she said. “While we, as Americans, can disagree politically, it is very important to maintain civility when interacting with people who hold different world views. Tolerance goes both ways, and the division in our current political climate will perpetuate if we neglect basic civility.”

The owners of Cultiva, who are “proudly liberal,” told the Lincoln Journal Star they fired the worker and apologized to Synek.

"We welcome everyone into our shop and do not condone the action of any employee that makes anyone feel unwelcome," co-owner Jason Anderson told the newspaper. "Making sure people feel welcome is our goal."

As I wrote in my new book, “Culture Jihad: How to Stop the Left From Killing a Nation,” it’s something of a sport among leftists these days to bully and badger conservatives, whether they be teenagers at a pro-life rally or a press secretary at a fancy restaurant.

Get in their faces. Absolutely harass them. That’s what Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., once told a mob of her supporters.

It’s a shame that our national discourse has become so coarsened. But there’s no one to blame but Democrats and their cronies in the mainstream media....

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    5 years ago

And in their businesses or where they work they harass conservative customers too.  Whether we are the business owner or the customer, they attack us because of our opinions and beliefs.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.1.1  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1    5 years ago

So you're all for fundamentalists denying gay people service but it's not okay for liberals to deny conservatives.

There's a term for that, hypocrisy. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @1.1.1    5 years ago

Serving customers in ordinary business dealings is fine. No problem with that.  Compelling a person  to express themselves or produce something that is in violation of ones religious beliefs is not ok.   

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.1.3  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1.2    5 years ago
Serving customers in ordinary business dealings is fine. No problem with that.  Compelling a person  to express themselves or produce something that is in violation of ones religious beliefs is not ok.   

We're not talking about compelling anyone to express themselves or produce anything.

We are talking about CUSTOMERS refusing to patronize a specific business. Try to stay on topic. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
1.2  Cerenkov  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    5 years ago

I'm glad they fired that bigot. Maybe it will be a teachable moment. Nah...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Cerenkov @1.2    5 years ago

Nah is right.  It says later in the article that she was not at all sorry for her actions.  Sad...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    5 years ago
You are f------ bigoted trash, and we do not want you in our restaurant

back in the early 80's I was a waiter. one night some religious jagoff stood up and made a loud public spectacle of himself when his family was seated in the section of a gay waiter, my now deceased friend John. after calling John a string of gay slurs, the thumper POS then went on a religious tirade to the astonishment of the now silent dining room. almost in unison seconds later, after the initial shock had worn off, I joined with 2 busboys, the head waiter, and an assistant manager to physically eject the bigot to the applause of some of the other diners. Todd the busboy tripped the thumper jackass as he was shoved out the front door and he ended up sprawled out on the sidewalk. it was a valuable bonding experience for the other restaurant employees and quite unique in the AIDS fearing 80's. after that event, I made sure that over the top displays of religion in my section did not go without some type of retribution, whether they realized it or not. stripping their tables of all dinnerware and the tablecloth while they were sitting there after the bill had been settled was my favorite. buh bye, gtfo and don't come back. most thumpers were shitty tippers anyway

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.3.1  MrFrost  replied to  devangelical @1.3    5 years ago

Dev...shoot me a private note... Got something to tell ya... LOL

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    5 years ago

Next comes the organized  breaking of  the windows of businesses that can be tied to Trump supporters. Probably a coordinated, overnight assault.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    5 years ago

The usual suspects are planning another fascist Antifa/illegal immigrant rally at the ICE facility in Aurora, Colorado on the 21st of this month.

There are efforts being planned to meet them by anti-protestors. These violent left wing radicals are turning out to be worse than Hitler's

Brown Shirts and their tactics are pretty much the same

th?id=OIP.RmysiJT_jXUNpG8dDq8n5QHaGd&w=2

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    5 years ago

The left doesn’t want to convert you. To them, you are an infidel, a dirty Jew, an expendable, lower life form. They’ve spent years building this narrative, and it’s all so they can justify whatever means they decide are necessary to get rid of you.

They will come after your business and your livelihood, and whether that works or not, they’ll try to round you up. This is the unifying theme in all of their policy proposals, and it’s plainly evident in the actions of every leftist “protester.”

They’re trying to silence and divide you. Don’t let them. They are trying to bully and intimidate you. Stand strong. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    5 years ago

Fascism ( / ˈ f æ ʃ ɪ z əm / ) is a form of  far right-wing authoritarian   ultranationalism [1] [2]  characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy [3]  which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. [4]  The first fascist movements  emerged in Italy  during  World War I , before  spreading to other European countries . [4]   Opposed to  liberalism Marxism , and  anarchism , fascism is placed on the  far-right  within the traditional  left–right spectrum . [4] [5] [6]

Fascists saw  World War I  as a  revolution  that brought massive changes to the nature of war, society, the state, and technology. The advent of  total war  and the total mass mobilization of society had broken down the distinction between civilians and combatants. A "military citizenship" arose in which all citizens were involved with the military in some manner during the war. [7] [8]  The war had resulted in the rise of a powerful state capable of mobilizing millions of people to serve on the front lines and providing economic production and logistics to support them, as well as having unprecedented authority to intervene in the lives of citizens. [7] [8]

Fascists believe that  liberal democracy  is obsolete and regard the complete mobilization of society under a  totalitarian   one-party state  as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties. [9]  Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a  dictator  and a  martial  government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society. [9]  Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature and views political violence, war and  imperialism  as means that can achieve national rejuvenation. [10] [11]  Fascists advocate a  mixed economy , with the principal goal of achieving  autarky  (national economic self-sufficiency) through  protectionist  and  interventionist  economic policies. [12]

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.1    5 years ago

I find that comment deeply disturbing. How can you speak for the Jewish Community? You probably don't even know one. Stop with the fear mongering. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    5 years ago
The usual suspects are planning another fascist Antifa/illegal immigrant rally at the ICE facility in Aurora, Colorado on the 21st of this month.

I'll be there to watch and film tea party fascists that attempt to hinder the 1st amendment rights of a legal protest get their over ripened melons thumped. let them tempt some 1960's karma. that ICE facility is surrounded by immigrant neighborhoods. it won't bother me a bit to watch Michelle Malkin and the xenophobic cult scum get their unamerican and unconstitutional asses kicked.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.3    5 years ago
Stop with the fear mongering.

The seeded article doesnt even have a name attached to it at the source.  And the article linked to in the first comment is by Todd Starnes, a known far right nut case from Fox News Radio. 

This is what happens to the seeds when such trash is allowed to roam free on your site. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
2.1.6  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    5 years ago
This is what happens to the seeds when such trash is allowed to roam free on your site. 

It's called freedom of speech, John. See what I did. I countered his position. That is what you are supposed to do.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.7  JohnRussell  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.6    5 years ago

They are posting nutjob articles and links. Then we cant say anything to them without having it censored. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.8  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.3    5 years ago

Take it up with the author of the seeded article as those words were clearly his not mine and attributed to him.  I agree with and stand by the author and the overall content of the whole article.  

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
2.1.9  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.2    5 years ago
 characterized by dictatorial power

"I have a pen and a phone."

forcible suppression of opposition

Antifa.

and strong regimentation of society and of the economy

P.C. policeand Business killing taxes.

That doesn't sound like the right in the U.S., I don't have to say what that sounds like do I?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.10  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.2    5 years ago

Today’s secular progressive left are doing their best to imitate and are now liberal fascists.  I note no response from the left here to leftists actions against business and customers for the “crime” of being conservative and or supporting the elected President of the United States 🇺🇸

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.11  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.3    5 years ago

Would my aunt being married to a Jew and my cousins being his and her offspring and me knowing some of his relatives count? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.13  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  devangelical @2.1.4    5 years ago

What?  We don’t have first amendment rights of free speech and association to protest their protest in public on the public square without fear of physical aggression being perpetrated upon us by the fist protest group?  They will peacefully accept our presence or go to jail for disturbing the peace and any property damage and physical assault they commit.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.14  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    5 years ago

American Liberty Report is on the board of censors non disapproved list and is thus tolerated here.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.1.15  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @2.1.9    5 years ago
"I have a pen and a phone."

And trump has a sharpie... Maybe he can upgrade to a pen and a phone when he gets past 5th grade. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
2.1.16  Raven Wing  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.1    5 years ago
They will come after your business and your livelihood, and whether that works or not, they’ll try to round you up. This is the unifying theme in all of their policy proposals, and it’s plainly evident in the actions of every leftist “protester.”

Wow! Talk about fear mongering. You are doing a really good job of that yourself to be pointing the finger at anyone else.

Your own hatred is truly palpable, and you have the gall to talk about others being hate mongers. Such hypocrisy is out in far right field.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.17  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.1    5 years ago
The left doesn’t want to convert you. To them, you are an infidel, a dirty Jew, an expendable, lower life form. They’ve spent years building this narrative, and it’s all so they can justify whatever means they decide are necessary to get rid of you.

Hey XX, since when do you speak for anyone but yourself. I would imagine that most Jews on NT and in the US would think that your comment, at best, is complete BS. BTW the majority of Jews are democratic, not republican. Which can be said of most all minorities. 

You'd better concentrate on keeping the few minorities in the Republican party happy before running your mouth about something you have little or no knowledge of. 

You could start with Trump's African American that just quit the republican party. And he lives in Redding the mythical capital of Jeffersonia. 

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
2.1.18  Raven Wing  replied to  Kavika @2.1.17    5 years ago

You could start with Trump's African American that just quit the republican party. And he lives in Redding the mythical capital of Jeffersonia. 

jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.19  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Kavika @2.1.17    5 years ago

Perhaps you could use the benefit of context by reading the whole article.  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.20  Kavika   replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.19    5 years ago
Perhaps you could use the benefit of context by reading the whole article.  

My comment was directed and in response to your ignorant comment.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.22  JohnRussell  replied to  Release The Kraken @2.1.21    5 years ago

No one in the history of this forum has posted as much fake news as you have.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.23  Greg Jones  replied to  devangelical @2.1.4    5 years ago

You know as well as all the rest of us that Antifa wants nothing better than another Charlottesville. Why would you support such violent actions by people who should be in the US in the first place and forcibly raise a Mexican flag over a facility that is currently housing mostly illegals who were already criminals? Whose side are you on anyway?

Hopefully the Aurora police will do their jobs this time and restrain the protestors for assaulting peaceful anti-protestors. The last time they were ordered to stand down by Aurora authorities who ordered the police chief to make the call ignore the trouble makers and made no attempt to keep them apart. Denver is just as bad, letting the same type of scum desicrate the memorial to fallen police officers which is right outside the main police station while the rank and file were told to stay in inside and chain the door shut.

Hope you film your leftist buddies hiding behind their black masks when they start the trouble. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.24  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Raven Wing @2.1.16    5 years ago

Your own hatred is truly palpable, and you have the gall to talk about others being hate mongers. Such hypocrisy is out in far left field.

 
 
 
sixpick
Professor Quiet
2.1.25  sixpick  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    5 years ago

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.26  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  sixpick @2.1.25    5 years ago

Sixpick?!! Welcome back.🎊🎉  We here on the right missed your valuable presence here.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
2.1.27  Raven Wing  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.24    5 years ago

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_24_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.28  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.8    5 years ago
I agree with and stand by the author and the overall content of the whole article. 

That's unfortunate because the author is a clueless hack. 

First of all, the Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses was an action by the GOVERNMENT. Both you and the author should open a fucking history book. 

Secondly, your author doesn't support one word of his accusations about the boycotts in Pittsburgh. Since you claim to stand by the overall content of the whole article, how about you prove that businesses have been vandalized and protests have occurred outside of those businesses since this alleged list came out. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.29  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.23    5 years ago
Antifa wants nothing better than another Charlottesville

it was a trumpster idiot that drove a car into that protest and killed a woman, not antifa.

I listen to the same ADF ass licking thumper owned AM radio station hosted by tea party advocates you listen to. they've been promoting a violent confrontation at the protest for a month. some of the radio hosts and callers have been threatening a violent response to anyone that does anything they define as desecrating the american flag, which is a protected 1st amendment right. they have even threatened protesters by claiming they will be carrying firearms on air. let the tea party morons try and we'll see what happens next.

describing those exercising that right as antifa is a sweeping generalization. antifa isn't a tool of the democrats, they're an international group started after WWII, but the proud boys, kkk, neo-nazis, white supremacists, and tea party are definitely associated with trump and the right. I think it's hilarious that a puny 5K watt directional AM radio station ginning up a bunch of old mental defectives to put themselves in harms way for ratings and to promote book sales for a dumbass tea party skank. any tea party dipshit blood that flows from that protest will be on their hands.

I won't be wearing a black mask. I'll be in the anti-protest group waiting for someone to set off a string of firecrackers so I can watch the tea party faithful drop and kiss the pavement in fear. although I doubt there's any real antifa members in denver, I cordially invite them to do a buck and wing on anyone with a selective definition of the 1st amendment. I plan on defending the whole thing.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.30  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.11    5 years ago
my aunt being married to a Jew and my cousins being his and her offspring

not according to buzz, better check with him on blood purity.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
2.1.31  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.8    5 years ago

Well, if you agree with him, you have to have some basis for that and I doubt that you do. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.32  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  devangelical @2.1.30    5 years ago

We aren’t talking about blood purity but about whether I know anyone of that religion and ethnic background as if I needed that to agree with the author and source of the seeded article.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.33  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.31    5 years ago

I don’t owe anyone an explanation or defense of who or what I believe or who I support or agree with on any issue.  I notice that none on the center left to far left deny that conservative businesses and customers are being targeted by the left or condemn the practice. Isn’t being opposed to what is happening as described by the article enough reason to support the article author?  

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
2.1.34  Cerenkov  replied to  devangelical @2.1.4    5 years ago

I see the left continues to embrace violence and intolerance. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.35  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.33    5 years ago
I notice that none on the center left to far left deny that conservative businesses and customers are being targeted by the left or condemn the practice.

I notice that you can't prove that any such thing is actually happening. 

Isn’t being opposed to what is happening as described by the article enough reason to support the article author?  

Since the author failed to support his claims with any evidence, NO. 

I did a search for news stories about protests and vandalism by 'liberals' @ businesses in Pittsburgh. There isn't one news article about your author's claim. It looks like this article is just another example of conservative fever dream. 

You and the conservatives here jump to condemn actions that you have no proof ever happened. Now you insist that you don't have to defend your agreement with  FABRICATED allegations. It looks like you and others here are just fine making shit up so you can spew bullshit about liberals.

Spreading lies is the opposite of 'Christian' Xx. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.36  devangelical  replied to  Cerenkov @2.1.34    5 years ago

unamerican filth with no respect for the US Constitution or those that died defending it deserve public beat downs

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.37  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Cerenkov @2.1.34    5 years ago

Without a doubt.  It’s sad but true.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.38  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  devangelical @2.1.36    5 years ago

And those who engage in public beat downs deserve to be arrested and put in prison for their crimes 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1.39  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.38    5 years ago

You don't seem to understand free speech goes both ways. We do not imprison people merely for expressing themselves in the USA...

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2.1.40  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.38    5 years ago
And those who engage in public beat downs deserve to be arrested and put in prison for their crimes

Then based on that premise, I trust you'll be turning yourself in to your local constabulary...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.43  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @2.1.39    5 years ago

Physical violence is not free speech or expression and is not constitutionally protected no matter how much one disagrees with what another is saying.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.44  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.1.40    5 years ago

Why?  I’ve never harmed another person in my life.  It would never occur to me to beat someone who disagrees with me even if they say to to me face to face.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.45  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.35    5 years ago

I await but not with held breath your apology for falsely accusing me regarding the truth of the seed.  

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.46  devangelical  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.38    5 years ago

[delete

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.47  devangelical  replied to    5 years ago

see what happens when commas aren't used?

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
2.1.48  Raven Wing  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2.1.40    5 years ago

I trust you'll be turning yourself in to your local constabulary...

jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.49  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.42    5 years ago

Where is your proof of vandalism and protests Xx? 

STOP deflecting. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.50  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.43    5 years ago

Neither you nor the author provided any evidence that there has been any physical violence Xx. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.51  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.45    5 years ago
I await but not with held breath your apology for falsely accusing me regarding the truth of the seed.  

Since those links are all you've got to support the bullshit in your seed, you have no right to expect an apology. 

From your TH link:

"The data that we plan to publish is publicly available from state governments and the Federal Election Commission. We're simply indexing that data in a more searchable way, the administrators of "Boycott MAGA" wrote on their Facebook page. "We do not encourage violence against Trump supporters. We simply support ridiculing them, alienating them, and refusing to patronize businesses run by them."

There has been NO vandalism or protests Xx. So you're slurping up the pablum and encourage your fellow travelers to swill it along with you.

Don't get pissed off when those of us who prefer facts don't imbibe. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
2.1.53  MrFrost  replied to  Release The Kraken @2.1.21    5 years ago
Yet the site allowed your parade of unsourced Russian hoax propaganda. Amazing!

Hey if it will allow you to post your vibrator/gif on a daily basis, you'll have a hard time complaining about others... yea? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.54  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @2.1.53    5 years ago

Please stay on topic which is liberal acts and expressions of intolerance of businesses and customers who are conservatives/Trump supporters.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.55  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  devangelical @2.1.4    5 years ago

How did the anti ice riot go today?  Did you enjoy the speech by Michelle Malkin in front of our beautiful American Flag?🇺🇸  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.56  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  devangelical @2.1.36    5 years ago

Did we get beat down in Aurora, Co. in front of the ICE facility today or in front of it’s commanding person at his home Thursday night?  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.58  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.55    5 years ago
How did the anti ice riot go today?

Another fever dream Xx. No riot occurred. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.59  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.56    5 years ago
Did we get beat down in Aurora, Co. in front of the ICE facility today

You were in Aurora, Co today? Tell me all about it...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.60  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.59    5 years ago

I wasn’t but the one I was addressing lives in the area and made claims as to what he just might do.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.61  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.58    5 years ago

Of course not.  The pro ICE group was much larger than the enemy group and Antifa doesn’t usually act out unless they are the ones with the large numerical advantage.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.62  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.60    5 years ago
I wasn’t but the one I was addressing lives in the area and made claims as to what he just might do. 

That doesn't give a reason why you would say 'we' when you weren't there. 

BTW, the one you were addressing said that he would video and watch the confrontation [which never happened]. What is your issue with him doing so? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.63  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.61    5 years ago
Of course not.  The pro ICE group was much larger than the enemy group and Antifa doesn’t usually act out unless they are the ones with the large numerical advantage.

That is FALSE Xx. Do you never tire of posting bullshit? 

There were more Anti-ICE protestors at the event at the commander's home than there were Pro-ICE counter protestors at the detention center. The Pro-ICE counter protestors were the ones that were outnumbered. The Anti-ICE protestors CHOSE to remain non-violent. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.64  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.62    5 years ago

We /our being the side I identify with and support. Using a sports analogy, when on a sports board I say we won last night referring to my Nebraska Cornhuskers doesn’t mean I was literally there playing nor when referring to other Husker fans and saying our team had a great game are they literally ours.  Of course you knew that in the first place. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.65  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.63    5 years ago

And three thugs were arrested by the police at the home. Not to mention some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors and its possible that some of them may well have made it obvious that they were packing heat.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.66  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.65    5 years ago
And three thugs were arrested by the police at the home.

Just as many of y'all [I use that to indicate those that you identify with and support] claim that 'bigot' has lost it's meaning from being overused, many of us [I use that to indicate those that I identify with and support] thin the term 'thugs' has also lost it's meaning and for exactly the same reason. 

Not to mention some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors and its possible that some of them may well have made it obvious that they were packing heat.

You know this how? Link? Or is that just more BS that you pulled from your nether regions? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.67  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.66    5 years ago

Read what I wrote and figure it out yourself if you can.  Then see if you notice the words “possibly” and “may well” and then try to figure out if I was stating a fact or expressing an opinion.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.68  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.67    5 years ago
Read what I wrote and figure it out yourself if you can.  

I did read what you wrote, you aren't hard to figure out at all Xx. 

Then see if you notice the words “possibly” and “may well” and then try to figure out if I was stating a fact or expressing an opinion. 

Not in these comments you didn't. 

And three thugs were arrested by the police at the home. Not to mention some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors

No 'possibly' or may well' in either of those statements. 

So where's your link stating that ANY of his neighbors are 'pro-ICE'? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.69  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.68    5 years ago

Really?  Who do you think you are dealing with here?  Did you not think that I’d present the evidence from the very post you clipped only parts from leaving out what I said was there?  Here it is:     “some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors and its possible that some of them may well have made it obvious that they were packing heat.”

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.70  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.69    5 years ago
 Here it is:     “some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors and its possible that some of them may well have made it obvious that they were packing heat.”

This will be the second time that I have asked you to PROVE that "some of the pro ICE people at his home were his literal neighbors". 

Tic Toc. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.71  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.70    5 years ago

...David Booth, who lives in Choate's neighborhood, refuses to sit by while these bullies invade his community.

"I was shocked and surprised when I found out there was going to be an 'ICE protest' in my neighborhood," he told me Tuesday. Booth discovered that Abolish ICE Denver used Facebook to spread information on how they will be "going door to door in the neighborhood to let people know that a 'monster' lives among us."

Booth condemned the witch hunt headed his community's way: "This policy of intimidation that we see the left continue to use is not OK. ... I would like to see the neighborhood rise up and support this man and his family."

I reached out to Facebook for a response to these public safety concerns, but received no answer by my deadline.

For Coloradans, violent threats to law enforcement officials' neighborhoods are especially disturbing given the chilling 2013 assassination of the head of the Colorado Department of Corrections outside his home in Monument. Booth will stand publicly in defense of his community Thursday and says he has his neighbors' support. "I think most of us, if not all, believe this protest is inappropriate regardless of where we stand on the issue of immigration," said Booth. "Our neighbor is just doing his job, and has done nothing wrong, or illegal, in carrying out his duties."...

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.72  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.71    5 years ago
David Booth, who lives in Choate's neighborhood, refuses to sit by while these bullies invade his community.

Yet he doesn't say anything about being out on the street during the protest in 'his neighborhood'. 

"I would like to see the neighborhood rise up and support this man and his family."

Nothing about supporting ICE. 

For Coloradans, violent threats to law enforcement officials' neighborhoods are especially disturbing given the chilling 2013 assassination of the head of the Colorado Department of Corrections outside his home in Monument.

Yet though Fox tried to infer at the time that it was a Muslim, Tom Clements was assinated by a white supremist. 

Oh, BTFW, I note that Malkin decries images of  Choate's face surrounded by flames, claiming that it suggests arson. After the AOC ad, I thought y'all were all about that kind of imagery. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.73  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.72    5 years ago

“Booth will stand publicly in defense of his community Thursday and says he has his neighbors' support. "I think most of us, if not all, believe this protest is inappropriate regardless of where we stand on the issue of immigration," said Booth. "Our neighbor is just doing his job, and has done nothing wrong, or illegal, in carrying out his duties."...”

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.74  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.73    5 years ago

Still not a 'pro-ICE' statement. He is supporting his NEIGHBOR, not ICE. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.75  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.74    5 years ago

Today's Abolish ICE extremists harbor the same seething "Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em like bacon" contempt for immigration enforcement as the "progressive" cop-haters of the 1970s and their George Soros-subsidized heirs in the Bush-era A.N.S.W.E.R. and amnesty coalitions, Code Pink, Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter movement.

The underlying mission back then was the same as now: Destabilization, disruption and destruction of civil order. 

David Booth, who lives in Choate's neighborhood, refuses to sit by while these bullies invade his community.

"I was shocked and surprised when I found out there was going to be an 'ICE protest' in my neighborhood," he told me Tuesday. Booth discovered that Abolish ICE Denver used Facebook to spread information on how they will be "going door to door in the neighborhood to let people know that a 'monster' lives among us."

Booth condemned the witch hunt headed his community's way: "This policy of intimidation that we see the left continue to use is not OK. ... I would like to see the neighborhood rise up and support this man and his family."

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.77  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.74    5 years ago

That must be why he was communicating with Michelle Malkin of the pro ICE counter protesters, because he wasn’t pro ICE? Any more attempts at hair splitting?  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.78  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.75    5 years ago

Seriously, WHY do you think that repeating the same non responsive bullshit contributes to the discussion Xx?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.79  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.77    5 years ago

Nope, not going to believe a fucking word out to Malkin's mouth. She's been caught in more false comments than you...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.80  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.78    5 years ago

It is responsive.  It’s the proof that Booth was in communication with Michelle Malkin the Pro ICE counter protest leader about the issue and creating a neighborhood response on the Thursday night to the anti ICE mob invasion of the neighborhood prior to the twin protests on Saturday.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.81  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.80    5 years ago

All it proves is that Malkin claims that. As I said, Malkin isn't credible. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.82  Texan1211  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.75    5 years ago

They won't ever accept as a source any right-wing-leaning source.

But they will believe anything CNN or MSNBC puts out.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.84  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to    5 years ago

Mocking in a carefully stated manner is more fun than simply ignoring....

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.85  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @2.1.82    5 years ago

They just petition to slide our sources from right bias to questionable at the other site and it happens often.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
2.1.86  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.85    5 years ago

What ? Who petitions whom ?

To move the arrow thingy in the graphics ?  

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.87  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  pat wilson @2.1.86    5 years ago

People petition the other site to re review sites that  have have already been reviewed and listed as right bias by them in order to get them moved into questionable by them.  It has happened this year to a large number of sites. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.88  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.87    5 years ago
People petition the other site to re review sites that  have have already been reviewed and listed as right bias by them in order to get them moved into questionable by them.  It has happened this year to a large number of sites. 

Gee Xx. Based on your prior comments, you are one of those people.

As their methodology states, review is a normal practice. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.1.89  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.22    5 years ago
No one in the history of this forum has posted as much fake news as you have.

No way! That's totally false. I personally have posted more fake news that anyone...and am proud of it!

(While this may seem like a stupid comment, please be aware that I am merely trying to fit in...to the general tone and mental level of most of the participants in these discussions).

Are you people really this stupid-- or are you just pretending?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.1.90  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @2.1.89    5 years ago

Are you people really this stupid-- or are you just pretending?

(And if so...why? 'Tis a mystery . . . jrSmiley_26_smiley_image.gif )

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.91  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.88    5 years ago

I have never asked that site to re review a left bias site to make it questionable instead.  I despise that site and everything it stands for and there is no way I’d go on their site asking them to approve or disapprove of any other.  They are nothing more than human debris over there, much like Facebook, Twitter, and Google.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.92  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Krishna @2.1.90    5 years ago

The stupidity of some American and European secular progressives knows no bounds.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.93  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.91    5 years ago
I have never asked that site to re review a left bias site to make it questionable instead.

You know that others have how? 

I'm sure that your requests were on behalf of getting questionable sites to be rated as acceptable. What you should be doing is petitioning the sites to get them to stop posting BS. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.94  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @2.1.93    5 years ago

I’d never stoop to that.  They are human debris scum of the earth and there is no way I’d beg anything from them.  I’m more interested in getting them included in a lawsuit by certain groups listed as hate against those who use the SPLC labeling in the pursuit of their business practices.  I’m hoping ADF or FAIR or AFA or FRC or all of them include MBFC in such a lawsuit. 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
2.1.95  pat wilson  replied to  Krishna @2.1.90    5 years ago

Sometimes I think we're being pranked.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
2.1.96  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.94    5 years ago
I’d never stoop to that.  They are human debris scum of the earth and there is no way I’d beg anything from them.  

Yet you stoop to calling people you don't even know 'human debris scum. 

I’m more interested in getting them included in a lawsuit by certain groups listed as hate against those who use the SPLC labeling in the pursuit of their business practices.  I’m hoping ADF or FAIR or AFA or FRC or all of them include MBFC in such a lawsuit. 

MBFC's methodology doesn't take into consideration whether a site is run by a hate group or not. They base their ratings on CONTENT. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3  MrFrost    5 years ago
If you don’t support extreme gun control, you’re evil. If you don’t hate President Trump, you’re evil. If you think that terrorists shouldn’t be running Middle Eastern countries, you’re evil. If you dare to have white skin or be a gender-binary male, you’re extra evil.

Any article that supports that level of hyperbole cannot be taken seriously. 

NEXT!!!!!!!!!!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @3    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    5 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    5 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    5 years ago

removed for context

You don't even know what fascism is, we should take you seriously because.......?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    5 years ago

He served our country so even though we can disagree with him about any political, economic, or religious issue, his words should be seriously considered even in total disagreement 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.3    5 years ago

Your definition of fascism applies much more to today’s political left than to constitutional republic free market capitalist conservatives and libertarians 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @3.1.3    5 years ago

Quit going anal on terminology.

How does the term Left Wing Brown Shirts fit? How about socialist left wing scum agitators?

Putin's police do the same things in the same way.

Both of them would be proud that some so called Americans are emulating them and their methods.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1.6    5 years ago

💯⚠️👏🇺🇸

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @3    5 years ago

Some hate their political side being called out on their excesses.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2    5 years ago

[delete

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2    5 years ago

Some hate their political side being called out on their excesses.  

[deleted    meta]

[Deleted coc  (retard)]

[Deleted  coc  (STFU)]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.2    5 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
3.2.4  KDMichigan  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.2    5 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.1    5 years ago

 I guess that you figure that MBFC doesn’t tie is conservatives hands behind our back or limit what we can say or how we can express ourselves enough for your satisfaction.  MBFC has broadened my horizons as sites I used to seed from get taken away for no good reason whatsoever other than someone’s whim there and I find other sites that seem to offend you just as much or more.  In a way MBFC has allowed me to find more sites harder to the right that barely fit their limits that I’d not have found otherwise.  

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
3.2.6  KDMichigan  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.3    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.6    5 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.2.8  MrFrost  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.3    5 years ago

removed for context

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.2.9  MrFrost  replied to  KDMichigan @3.2.4    5 years ago

Removed for context

800

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2.10  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @3.2.1    5 years ago

You do that all of the time yourself.

As you well know by now, the source doesn't matter if the facts are true.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.2.11  Greg Jones  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.2    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.14  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.9    5 years ago

And occupy democrats is one of the very few left bias sites that MBFC rates as questionable and you put it here and I didn’t flag it.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.2.15  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.14    5 years ago

Questionable sources can't be seeded but they can be posted in a thread. Of course since you've done it, you know that. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @3    5 years ago

The mud-slinging and smear campaigns also are being directed at supporters and donors, namely those with the temerity to back President Trump. They're facing a revived effort by Trump critics to name and shame them, with the apparent goal of hurting their businesses.

In one of the latest examples, a Facebook post on a page called simply “Ban Kenny Chesney from Pittsburgh” threatened to make public a list of almost 100 local businesses in the Pennsylvania city that are owned by Trump supporters. While the page has since been taken down, a new website has been promised that will include “a database of Trump supporter-owned businesses in the Pittsburgh area, as well as tips for how to get those specific businesses closed down,” according to local media.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4  Dismayed Patriot    5 years ago
"The fundamental difference between these kinds of boycotts is the goal. If you boycotted Gillette, it’s probably because you don’t want to give money to a company that vilifies masculinity as evil. When the Germans boycotted Jewish businesses, it was to drive them to poverty. It wasn’t about principle. The goal was for the Jews, packed into ghettos, to starve to death. Keep that distinction in mind."

Hilarious. So according to the "American Liberty Report's" anonymous opinion author, conservative boycotts equal the righteous allies, while the progressive boycotts equate to Nazi Germany starving Jews.

 "left-wing nut jobs in Pittsburgh", "the rabid left" , "The left doesn’t want to convert you. To them, you are an infidel, a dirty Jew, an expendable, lower life form"

Just more expected despicable hate and bullshit rhetoric trying to put words in their opponents mouths. 79% of Jewish Americans vote Democrat, and from this conservatives statement it's very clear why. This dumb shit is the only one saying "dirty Jew", not those on the left. His/Her (who knows because the opinion piece doesn't list an author) comparison is just gross and completely uncalled for. 

"They will come after your business and your livelihood, and whether that works or not, they’ll try to round you up"

What vile hateful lies some on the right spout. Many claimed Obama was going to "round them up" too and even though after 8 years that never happened, they're still pissed off at Obama for their tiny weak minds ever having to imagine it.

"They’re trying to silence and divide you.", "They are trying to bully and intimidate you."

Talk about ginning up hate with disgusting violent rhetoric and fear. What they're really afraid of are people who can think for themselves and refuse to financially support the anti-immigrant, anti-minority, anti-lgtbq and truly Anti-American right wing extremists and the actual calculable violence they inspire. This anonymous conservative moron that is claiming boycotts from the left are akin to Nazi oppression yet completely ignores the dozens and dozens of innocent Americans gunned down by right wing extremists every year just shows how hypocritical and insincere the right wing forked tongued really is.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
4.1  lady in black  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4    5 years ago

69993107_1351832564983368_4798842933497298944_n.png?_nc_cat=101&_nc_oc=AQlW2pmiwY8A0vUVTMkQS2Fx5cZbsw3_tEdkBeC7BmPPyc_4iyDPiY0XMviCn-SNZmc&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=8e040cab6c017152c0212480b55fedfe&oe=5DFFA345

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Raven Wing  replied to  lady in black @4.1    5 years ago

For many it seems the Constitution is not worth the paper it was written on...

.......unless they want to use it for their own agenda.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Raven Wing @4.1.1    5 years ago

You describe the secular progressive democrat left faction quite well...

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Guide
4.1.3  Raven Wing  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.2    5 years ago
You describe the secular progressive democrat left faction quite well

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_36_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4    5 years ago

You're not thinking for yourself. [delete] It appears you have been brainwashed by an overload of hateful left wing lies and propaganda.

Very sad....

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2    5 years ago

Well said and note how they on the left are much more angry about their attempts to boycott and vandalize business to the point of being shutdown and their making it hard for conservative customers to shop or dine being exposed than they are about anything else.  They are furious that we are talking about their hypocrisy. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
4.2.2  Cerenkov  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.1    5 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Cerenkov @4.2.2    5 years ago

Thank you for your very fine contribution to this seed above.  It was a good one.  The reason why we must all stick together manifested itself above.  Also, welcome back. You’ve been missed here and like I said to sixpick above I’m glad you are back as well.  🎉🎊

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4    5 years ago

See 3.3 above.  

 
 

Who is online





98 visitors