╌>

Baghdad Rocket Attack kills Iranian MIlitary Leaders including Gen Qassim Soleimani, reports say

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  4 years ago  •  115 comments

By:   Frank Miles

Baghdad Rocket Attack kills Iranian MIlitary Leaders including Gen Qassim Soleimani, reports say
President Trump, who on Tuesday night vowed that the situation "will not be a Benghazi" -- a pointed reference to the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya on the Obama administration's watch, ordered deployment of about 750 U.S. soldiers to the Middle East. The embassy attack, one of the worst in recent memory, followed deadly U.S. airstrikes on Sunday that killed 25 fighters of the Iran-backed group, the Kataeb Hezbollah. The U.S. military said the airstrikes were retaliation...

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

All thanks to our President for being involved in and approving this attack against top Iranian terrorist leadership.  The man responsible for the killing of hundreds of Americans is now dead.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T










At least three rockets were fired at  Baghdad  International Airport Friday killing at least seven people, including Iranian Gen. Qassim Soleimani, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' elite Quds Force, according to multiple reports early Friday.

Soleimani  is the military mastermind whom Secretary of State  Mike Pompeo  had deemed equally as dangerous as  Islamic State  leader  Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi , who was killed in a strike by U.S.-led forces in October.

Soleimani was the long-running leader of the elite intelligence wing called Quds Force – which itself has been a designated terror group since 2007, and is estimated to be 20,000 strong. Considered one of the most powerful men in Iran, he was routinely referred to as the “shadow commander” or “spymaster.”

"Soleimani is our leader" had been photographed spray-painted on windows by Iran-backed militiamen at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

The strike also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces, three Iraqi officials told The Associated Press. Iraqi TV reported the deaths as well.


Local reporters had suggested that pro-Iran military leaders may have been targeted, but officials have not yet confirmed all of the dead and who may have been behind the attack. An official with an Iran-backed paramilitary group known as the Popular Mobilization Forces told The Associated Press one of the victims was its airport protocol officer, identifying him as Mohammed Reda.

Iraq ’s Security Media Cell, which released information regarding Iraqi security, said the three Katyusha rockets landed near the cargo hall.

Iraqi security also said two cars were on fire.

The nighttime attack occurred amid tensions with the U.S. after an  Iran -backed militia attacked the U.S. Embassy in  Baghdad , which was targeted Tuesday by angry mobs who were protesting recent U.S. airstrikes.

The two-day siege outside of the U.S. Embassy in  Baghdad  came to an end Wednesday afternoon after dozens of pro-Iran militiamen and their supporters withdrew from the compound.

The crisis started early Tuesday, when, in an orchestrated assault, hundreds of protesters stormed the embassy compound, one of the most heavily fortified U.S. diplomatic missions in the world.

President Trump , who on Tuesday night vowed that  the situation "will not be a Benghazi"  -- a pointed reference to the deadly 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya on the Obama administration's watch, ordered deployment of about 750 U.S. soldiers to the  Middle East .

The  embassy attack , one of the worst in recent memory, followed deadly  U.S. airstrikes on Sunday that killed 25 fighters  of the Iran-backed group, the Kataeb Hezbollah. The U.S. military said the airstrikes were retaliation for last week's killing of  an American contractor in a rocket attack on an Iraqi military base , which the U.S. blamed on the militia.


Secretary of Defense  Mark Esper  reacted on Thursday to the  U.S. Embassy attack in Iraq  earlier this week, saying that it's time for  Iran  to start "acting like a normal country.”

“We are there in  Iraq  working with our Iraqi partners to ensure the enduring defeat of  ISIS ,” Esper said on “ America’s Newsroom ” on Thursday.

“Through the president's direction, we were able to physically defeat the caliphate that remains physically defeated, if you will," he added. "And now our aim is to deter further Iranian bad behavior that has been going on now for over 40 years. It's time that Iran started acting like a normal country.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

Soleimani  is the military mastermind whom Secretary of State  Mike Pompeo had deemed equally as dangerous as Islamic State  leader  Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi , who was killed in a strike by U.S.-led forces in October.

Soleimani was the long-running leader of the elite intelligence wing called Quds Force – which itself has been a designated terror group since 2007, and is estimated to be 20,000 strong. Considered one of the most powerful men in Iran, he was routinely referred to as the “shadow commander” or “spymaster.”

"Soleimani is our leader" had been photographed spray-painted on windows by Iran-backed militiamen at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

The strike also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces, three Iraqi officials told The Associated Press. Iraqi TV reported the deaths as well.



 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
2  charger 383    4 years ago

Problem with title corrected by Charger at HA's request

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  charger 383 @2    4 years ago

Thank you! 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    4 years ago

Great news!

Here's a profile of the dead terrorist.  The blood of many Americans was on his hands.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    4 years ago

Did you hear progressive members of Congress speaking out against what our President did?  Also progressives in the media and their network ‘contributors’?  Simply ridiculous.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    4 years ago

That’s really sad

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.2  1stwarrior  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    4 years ago

Wish I could get into the article - it's a Mediate thread - 

Congressperson Udall is leading the charge against the attack and is calling on Congress to "freeze" Trump's use of "power".

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  1stwarrior @3.1.2    4 years ago

From the link 1stwarrior posted.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/congressional-democrats-denounce-killing-of-soleimani-trump-is-bringing-u-s-to-brink-of-an-illegal-war/?fbclid=IwAR0sciiyupYI8ejNI_MaO0h6BtjrLwlfSKRTp_xNeKfcrE9UXL0yrPfeLac

When it comes to Iran, this administration has time and time again chosen rash provocation over any coherent strategy. I fear tonight’s escalation may be no different.

My first thought is with the men and women serving our country in the Middle East and around the globe.

— Senator Tom Carper (@SenatorCarper) January 3, 2020

The justification for the assasination is to “deter future Iranian attacks”.

One reason we don’t generally assasinate foreign political officials is the belief that such action will get more, not less, Americans killed.

That should be our real, pressing and grave worry tonight.

— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) January 3, 2020

There is no question that Qasem Soleimani was an enemy of the United States.  I feel no sadness at the news of his death. But I have serious concerns about this President’s execution of a potential act of war without authorization of Congress.

— Rep. Andy Levin (@RepAndyLevin) January 3, 2020

Trump’s apparent assassination of Soleimani is a massive, deliberate, and dangerous escalation of conflict with Iran. The President just put the lives of every person in the region – U.S. service members and civilians – at immediate risk.

We need de-escalation now.

— Ed Markey (@SenMarkey) January 3, 2020

Trump Admin owes a full explanation of airstrike reports—all the facts—to Congress&the American people. The present authorizations for use of military force in no way cover starting a possible new war. This step could bring the most consequential military confrontation in decades

— Richard Blumenthal (@SenBlumenthal)  January 3, 2020

Are the Democrats all on crack? WTF?

Not one damn peep out these assholes during Obama's 8 years of his NATO war with Libya; putting troops back into Iraq to save an Iraqi government that is loyal to Iran; sending troops to train "moderate" Sunnis and Kurds in Syria; along with massive airstrikes in that country; and not forgetting his greatly expanded extra judicial drone killings, which included two US citizens w/o any trial.

If Bush Jr hadn't tried our hand at failed nation building; and kept his father's and Clinton's containment plan in effect. And, if Obama hadn't reinserted US troops back into Iraq, w/o permission from Congress might I add, then we wouldn't be having this damn conversation to begin with.

If we are going to have US troops and personnel in Iraq we damn well better protect them. Killing the head of a terrorist group that is know to be coordinating strikes against US personnel in Iraq is a good thing. Leave it to the fucking Democrats to side with terrorists from Iran!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    4 years ago
Did you hear progressive members of Congress speaking out against what our President did?

I remember when we killed bin Laden and Americans came together in celebration. I think we are going to find the progressives will continue their hatred for this President and might even take the side of Iran.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  1stwarrior @3.1.2    4 years ago

Yup, that's what I expected from the left.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.3    4 years ago
Leave it to the fucking Democrats to side with terrorists from Iran!

It's who they are!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ronin2 @3.1.3    4 years ago

It’s what they do...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  Vic Eldred    4 years ago

They thought they could screw with Trump because it was election season. His name isn't Clinton or Obama - Don't screw with Trump!!!!

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    4 years ago

320

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1    4 years ago

Are you serious? You should be ashamed of yourself 1st. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.2  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    4 years ago

This should be more like it for some folks, eh John?

BREAKING: Ilhan Omar Attacks Trump For Killing Top Iranian Terrorist, Promotes Conspiracy Theory

Guess she hates Trump as much as you do.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.2    4 years ago

I'm watching Rachel Maddow and she is trying so hard to sell this as a bad idea because we hadn't taken this dude out before.

Pitiful.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.2    4 years ago

What is the conspiracy theory? 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.5  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.4    4 years ago

Read the article in the link.

Here - I did it for you - again.

Despite the statement from the Pentagon and the clear reasoning behind the attack, Omar responded by suggesting that Trump secretly carried out the strike to provide a “distraction” from the upcoming Senate impeachment trial.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.6  Tacos!  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.2    4 years ago

Am I really supposed to feel bad that this guy is dead?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.7  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.5    4 years ago

I saw that, so what is the conspiracy theory? 

If you dont think Trump is happy to have a distraction from impeachment you havent been paying attention. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.8  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.7    4 years ago
If you dont think Trump is happy to have a distraction from impeachment you havent been paying attention. 

Maybe it's the Democrats who are using impeachment to distract from any good thing that might happen while Trump is president.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.7    4 years ago
If you dont think Trump is happy to have a distraction from impeachment you havent been paying attention. 

Are Democrats incapable of doing more than one thing at a time?

What impeachment?

Is "the vote of our lifetime" going to take a backseat to anything?

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
4.1.10  al Jizzerror  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.6    4 years ago
Am I really supposed to feel bad that this guy is dead?

Fuck NO!

I'd like to do a happy dance on his fucking grave.

I just worry about retaliation against our forces in the area.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.11  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.8    4 years ago

You hit the nail on the head.  Right on target 🎯.  Progressives democrats would rather this guy and Baghdadi were still alive doing their thing rather than Trump get re elected because he took them out.  

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
4.1.12  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.11    4 years ago

how about we are all glad he is toast

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
4.1.13  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.7    4 years ago
Trump is happy to have a distraction from impeachment

what impeachment?  the one pelosi is scared to deliver to the senate?

that's funny :)

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
4.1.14  al Jizzerror  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.11    4 years ago
Progressives democrats would rather this guy and Baghdadi were still alive doing their thing rather than Trump get re elected because he took them out.

That's total fucking bullshit.

I'm glad Baghdadi is dead.

That's the best thing Trump has done in Syria.

Butt abandoning our Kurdish allies was wrong.

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
4.1.15  igknorantzrulz  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.14    4 years ago

Butt abandoning our Kurdish allies was wrong.

Seriously WRONG

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.16  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.7    4 years ago

Impeachment is the distraction from how well things are going for America and the American people.  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.1.17  Ronin2  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.14    4 years ago

We didn't abandon anyone in Syria.

We still have troops in Syria. They are holding the northern Syria oil fields. We are still conducting air strikes.

As for the Syrian Kurds- they quickly latched onto the Syrian government alliance. They are being protected by Syrian, Russian, and Iranian troops.

Sorry if Obama's and Hillary's misbegotten plan of removing Assad failed. It was doomed to failure the second Syria invited Russia, China, and Iran into the country.

Oh, and our troops in Syria are all there illegally. The Syrian government has requested they leave several times. 

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
4.1.18  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ronin2 @4.1.17    4 years ago
We didn't abandon anyone in Syria.

how do you expect to be taken seriously...

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.1.19  Ronin2  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.1.18    4 years ago

All you need to do is prove it.

If Turkey were wiping out the Syrian Kurds the MSM would be all over Trump about it. It would be headline news every night.

What, are you sorry there was no Kurdish massacre? Or, that Trump was right? Of course he capitulated to US intelligence agencies, military, and the state department and kept a limited amount of US troops in Syria to conduct operations against ISIS/ISIL. The only thing that has changed in Syria is our footprint, which lowered the exposure of US forces to attack from having to hold so much territory.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.20  Vic Eldred  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.10    4 years ago
I just worry about retaliation against our forces in the area.

They already attacked the Embassy. Before that they killed an American contractor. Before that they shot down an American drone. Before that they hit allied oil tankers. Before that they were killing American personnel.  

Regardless of what we do they will do these things. Yesterday they were finally punished.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.21  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.8    4 years ago

Donald Trump is not fit to be president of the United States.  That is the case with or without any good YOU think he may have done. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.22  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.7    4 years ago

John - you continue to show all of us that you really don't have a grasp on how governments interact nor protect each other.

Here - maybe you can respond - intelligently - to this info - 

There were ten times more air strikes in the covert war on terror during President Barack Obama’s presidency than under his predecessor, George W. Bush.

Obama  embraced the US drone programme , overseeing more strikes in his first year than Bush carried out during his entire presidency. A total of 563 strikes, largely by drones, targeted Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama’s two terms, compared to 57 strikes under Bush. Between 384 and 807 civilians were killed in those countries, according to reports logged by the Bureau.

That figure does not include deaths in active battlefields including Afghanistan – where US air attacks have shot up since Obama withdrew the majority of his troops at the end of 2014. The country has since come under frequent US bombardment, in an unreported war that saw 1,337 weapons dropped last year alone – a 40% rise on 2015 .

And guess what John - Congress DID NOT AUTHORIZE Obama's air strikes.  So, I wonder why, all of a sudden, they start screaming.  Oh Yeah - they need "another" Article of Impeachment and, if they keep screaming, they actually thing they'll get one???  Bullshyte.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
4.1.23  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.21    4 years ago

Oh sniff, sniff - remember this?? - click - click - click - click - and, no, that's not an RCA record.  Keep on dreaming your pipe dreams John - none of them have come true yet.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.25  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.7    4 years ago
'I saw that, so what is the conspiracy theory?  If you dont think Trump is happy to have a distraction from impeachment you havent been paying attention.'

That's exactly what this is.

It was predicted years ago.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.27  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.25    4 years ago
It was predicted years ago.  

Can you expound a bit on your statement? How many years? What prompted it to be "predicted"? And it specifically said he would piss off Iran? 

C'mon you can do it please.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.28  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.27    4 years ago

I don't answer to you Jim.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.30  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @4.1.26    4 years ago

You sound like Tex.  Prove it.

LOL!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.31  Tessylo  replied to  XDm9mm @4.1.24    4 years ago
'It's sad really to watch an adult have such temper tantrums.'

It's pathetic and deplorable that the 'president' has temper tantrums on a daily basis and his followers still support him.

Deplorable, deplorable, deplorable

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.32  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.16    4 years ago

'Impeachment is the distraction from how well things are going for America and the American people.'

You mean America's most wealthy and the tRump administration?

P.S. jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.33  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.28    4 years ago
I don't answer to you Jim. 

And on this subject, I knew you couldn't...........and wouldn't. Nuff said.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
4.1.34  al Jizzerror  replied to  Ronin2 @4.1.17    4 years ago
We didn't abandon anyone in Syria.

I guess it was just another lie when Trump said:

TRUMP INSISTS ABANDONING KURDS WAS “STRATEGICALLY BRILLIANT”

It was one of half-a-dozen crazy things the president said today about his disastrous decision to pull out of northern Syria and let Turkey invade. BY BESS LEVI N
OCTOBER 16, 2019

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
4.1.35  al Jizzerror  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.20    4 years ago
they killed an American contractor.

We bombed them and killed 25 for that:

US bombs pro-Iran militant group in Iraq, Syria in retaliation for rocket attack

The U.S. attack - the largest yet targeting an Iraqi state-sanctioned militia - and the calls for retaliation, represent a new escalation in the proxy war between the U.S. and Iran playing out in the Middle East that could threaten U.S. interests in the region. 

The calls for revenge in Baghdad came a day after U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Washington had carried out military strikes targeting the Iranian-backed Iraqi militia it had blamed for a rocket attack that killed an American contractor in Iraq last week. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.36  Vic Eldred  replied to  al Jizzerror @4.1.35    4 years ago

And they came back and attacked the Embassy. I'm afraid they will have to stop. De-escalation is still an option for them.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.37  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.30    4 years ago

Aww....you care. You really, really care.

That's sweet.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.38  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XDm9mm @4.1.26    4 years ago

Inquiring minds want to know!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.39  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.31    4 years ago

Deplorable and darn proud of it.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.40  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    4 years ago

I thought it was awesome.  No more ‘leading’ from behind.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    4 years ago

They can’t screw with America with Trump as our President.  Remember when he canceled retribution of the drone shoot down because 150 Iranian civilians wasn’t proportional to the offense?  Well, this one was perfect.  And Trump pulled the trigger on the operation.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2    4 years ago
They can’t screw with America with Trump as our President

384

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2    4 years ago

I guess you could say he's more than "fit" for the office of President. I got an idea, let's give him another term!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.2    4 years ago

I agree. That’s a great 👍 idea 💡!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.3    4 years ago

See you on Tuesday, Nov 3rd.  Don't say anything but I heard Biden tell an audience to get out and vote on Nov 11.  It will be our secret!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago
7e4cef6d-8d80-4cf6-b1ba-dab8b0640300.jpg

Source: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP

UPDATE: The Pentagon has released a statement explaining that today's strike was launched in order to "deter future Iranian attack plans." And it sounds like there were quite a few. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
5.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5    4 years ago
UPDATE : The Pentagon has released a statement explaining that today's strike was launched in order to "deter future Iranian attack plans." And it sounds like there were quite a few.

The strike may encourage future Iranian attacks.

We are now facing a possible war with Iran.

I worry about our troops in the area.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1    4 years ago
The strike may encourage future Iranian attacks.

They have seemed pretty enthusiastic about attacking us or our allies wherever they can for about 40 years.

We did this in response to attacks that had already happened. How were we supposed to respond? Harsh language? Cash payments?

I worry about our troops in the area.

Were you not worried about them yesterday? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1    4 years ago

They are on high alert and ready for anything Iran might try.  Iran would be foolish to take on America in a war. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1    4 years ago

Which is the reason more marines are headed to the area.

I really wish we weren't in Iraq, Syria, or Afghanistan; but if we are going to be there we damn well better be protecting those serving our country.  If we need to kick the Iranian militia in the teeth a few times for them to leave us alone in the area, so be it.

It is time for the Iraqi government to piss or get off the pot. Either they are allied with Iran or they are allied with the US. There is no damn middle ground.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1    4 years ago

I think the next target should be to knock out all of their nuclear facilities. We have the bombers and specialized bombs for that task.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
5.1.6  KDMichigan  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1    4 years ago
The strike may encourage future Iranian attacks.

As opposed to all the other ones?

We are now facing a possible war with Iran.

Maybe we should just send them another 150 billion cash brought in on pallets? It worked for the shit stain in chief obama.

I worry about our troops in the area

Of course you do, but keeping them in Syria you don't care so much. Do you see the hypocricy? Probably not......But Trump.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
5.1.7  al Jizzerror  replied to  KDMichigan @5.1.6    4 years ago
Maybe we should just send them another 150 billion cash brought in on pallets? It worked for the shit stain in chief obama.

They money Obama returned to Iran was their money.

They sent us that money (before their revolution) to pay for military supplies (mainly aircraft) that we refused to deliver.

The World Court determined that the money should be returned so Obama used it to convince Iran to back off of its nuclear program.

Trump shredded the Iranian agreement so they are once again working hard on developing nukes.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
5.1.8  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1.7    4 years ago
The World Court determined that the money should be returned so Obama used it to convince Iran to back off of its nuclear program.

Under a "Non-Binding" ……… Agreement ?

"A non binding contract is an agreement in which the parties are not legally obligated to carry out its terms."

Obama gave "Cash"....Iran actually gave NOTHING but "Words" in return !

Great Job ! jrSmiley_104_smiley_image.jpg

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
5.1.9  igknorantzrulz  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1.7    4 years ago

man, r his supporters ever short on facts...

it's disturbing how brainwashed some have become.

actually, it's not that they are short on facts, they just don't know what the facts are.

know matter how u look at it, it is not good for our country, or the world

period

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
5.1.10  al Jizzerror  replied to  It Is ME @5.1.8    4 years ago
Obama gave "Cash"....Iran actually gave NOTHING but "Words" in return !

Obama returned their money.

They agreed to limit their nuclear program.  The inspectors said they were complying with the agreement that Trump shredded.  Great job!

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
5.1.11  It Is ME  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1.10    4 years ago
Obama returned their money .

Because of "Trust" ? jrSmiley_87_smiley_image.gif

" They agreed to limit their nuclear program."

"WORD" salad ! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

"The inspectors said they were complying with the agreement"

If they ACTUALLY were, you wouldn't be worried now. It hasn't been that long since the Obama/Kerry Non-Binding Agreement was nixed by Trump ! Is Iran Quicker than we are ? jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.12  Vic Eldred  replied to  al Jizzerror @5.1.10    4 years ago
Obama returned their money.

That was Obama's explanation. If so it was the government of the Shah's money.


They agreed to limit their nuclear program.

At a tremendous cost. Sanctions were lifted, Russia was allowed to do just about anything so they would help on the deal and we delivered everything up front for their word.


The inspectors said they were complying with the agreement that Trump shredded. 

Trump wouldn't have been able to shred it if it was a formal treaty. Why didn't Obama get congressional approval?


Great job!

A badly needed one. Thank you Mr President.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
6  al Jizzerror    4 years ago
At least three rockets were fired at  Baghdad  International Airport Friday killing at least seven people, including Iranian Gen. Qassim Soleimani, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' elite Quds Force, according to multiple reports early Friday.

I wonder if our personnel in the area feel safer tonight (I'm glad I'm not in the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad).

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1  Texan1211  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago

Maybe.

Might feel a little better, knowing that the guy approving and planning and sometimes funding attacks resulting in hundreds of American deaths is gone for good.

I think most folks know the risk of being stationed in the Middle East. Do you think we will do nothing to protect our people?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6.2  Tacos!  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago
I wonder if our personnel in the area feel safer tonight

I hope so. I know I would be encouraged knowing that we had just killed a critical enemy leader. If our military is going to be cringing in fear and anxiety every time we hurt the enemy, then what are we doing in the world?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago

"In April 2019, the State Department announced Iran was responsible for killing 608 U.S. troops during the Iraq War. Soleimani was the head of the Iranian and Iranian-backed forces carrying out those operations killing American troops. According to the State Department, 17 percent of all deaths of U.S. personnel in Iraq from 2003 to 2011 were orchestrated by Soleimani.

As recently as 2015, a travel ban and United Nations Security Council resolutions had barred Soleimani from leaving Iran.

Friday's Baghdad strike also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, the deputy commander of Iran-backed militias known as the Popular Mobilization Forces, a source told Fox News. In all, at least seven people were killed and at least three rockets were fired, officials told The Associated Press. An official with the Popular Mobilization Forces said its airport protocol officer, Mohammed Reda, also died."

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
6.4  KDMichigan  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago
(I'm glad I'm not in the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad).

I bet Chris Stevens wishes he was there. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.4.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  KDMichigan @6.4    4 years ago

Oh ya, the time help was never called. When some were more worried about offending the locals.

This was a frightening moment for the Obama/Clinton crowd.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
6.4.2  1stwarrior  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.4.1    4 years ago

They were only offended by the "movie".

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.4.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  1stwarrior @6.4.2    4 years ago

Oh ya, that's right!  BTW, did you know that the media did it again? The New York Times referred to these Iranian operatives as "mourners."

They got bagged for it:

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
6.4.4  al Jizzerror  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.4.1    4 years ago
Oh ya, the time help was never called.

Ambassador Stevens was offered a full U.S. security detail butt unfortunately, he turned it down because he wanted to use locals to establish trust.

Big mistake.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.4.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.4.4    4 years ago

There were thoughts for a rescue, nonetheless. Unfortunately, Hillary & Co were more worried about offending the locals and the Marines were ordered to change from military uniforms to civilian clothing and back numerous times:

"But, one commander told the committee that as they were readying themselves to deploy they kept having to change in and out of their uniforms four times.

The military never deployed to Benghazi."


 
 
 
user image
Freshman Silent
6.5    replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago

You didn't seem to care much when Americans died under Hillary's watch at Benghazi. Due to straight up negligence. You wanted to make her president! lol. All of a sudden you are concerned with "American" lives. Sounds to me you are pouting over a dead terrorist. Typical baizuo complex.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
6.5.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  @6.5    4 years ago
You didn't seem to care much when Americans died under Hillary's watch at Benghazi.

That's a fucking lie.

The Republicans conducted four Congressional investigations that cleared her.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.5.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.5.1    4 years ago
That's a fucking lie.

They didn't die under her watch?  Who was Secretary of State at the time?

 
 
 
user image
Freshman Silent
6.5.3    replied to  al Jizzerror @6.5.1    4 years ago

They may have cleared her from being criminally charged, but they didn't clear her incompetence. She was sent dozens of emails asking for aid and support that were flat out ignored.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
6.5.4  KDMichigan  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.5.1    4 years ago
That's a fucking lie.

Is this more lefty white-wing revisionism?

Please tell who's watch it was under, plz tell who was in a alcohol induced sleep that couldn't be bothered, plz tell us who blamed it on a video?

256

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.5.5  Tessylo  replied to  al Jizzerror @6.5.1    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Guide
6.6  Drakkonis  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago
I wonder if our personnel in the area feel safer tonight (I'm glad I'm not in the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad).

I was in Iraq. Can't speak for those there now, but I can tell you I feel pretty good about what President Trump did. If I were there now I'd feel pretty encouraged that the guy who had killed so many of us is now part of the atmosphere. I'd feel pretty good that someone finally did something about it. If I were there right now I might not feel safer but I wouldn't feel less safe, as my brothers and sisters were getting killed already anyway. And as for retaliation, well, bring it on. We never were cowering in our bunkers, hoping they'd just leave us alone. They can go ahead and "retaliate", as if they were just minding their own business, innocently killing our troops. Hopefully, if they do "retaliate", Trump let's us bomb the stuffing out of Iranian military bases. 

 
 
 
TTGA
Professor Silent
6.7  TTGA  replied to  al Jizzerror @6    4 years ago
I wonder if our personnel in the area feel safer tonight

Ask yourself whether the personnel in the Solomon Islands in April of 1943 felt safer after the P-38's took out Admiral Yamamoto. Answer:  It wasn't their job to feel safe; it was their job to kick some Japanese ass no matter how they felt about it.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7  Tacos!    4 years ago

Kudos to our people for knowing where this enemy was and putting him down so efficiently. Job well done all around.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8  Kavika     4 years ago

Glad the bastard is dead. No matter how you look at it this killing is a major escalation of tension with Iran. I'm sure that Iran will retaliate somewhere in the world and it my not be the middle east. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Kavika @8    4 years ago
Glad the bastard is dead.

It was justice for a lot of American soldiers, I'm sure.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9  Vic Eldred    4 years ago

"Look at those faces. We eliminate an enemy of humanity, a mass murdering terrorist making plans to murder more Americans and they’re as sour as they were on 11/8/16. Trump again ruined their narrative, how dare he!" ......Tammy Bruce


ENU8hyiXsAAwp8x?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11  Tessylo    4 years ago

That needs to have your 'president's' photo in place of his.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
11.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @11    4 years ago

Is that a death wish?


All can see where you stand.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
11.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @11.1    4 years ago

It is to any objectIve observer.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12  Tessylo    4 years ago

Who is 'all'?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @12    4 years ago

All those who are reading this.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @12.1    4 years ago

[delete]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
12.1.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.1    4 years ago
deleted for context by Charger
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @12.1    4 years ago

Like I care.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12.1.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.3    4 years ago

Obviously you don't.

I'm glad you were able to give people the progressive perspective. People need to know.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @12.1.5    4 years ago

I don't care what you or any tRump supporter thinks, PERIOD.

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Participates
12.1.7  KDMichigan  replied to  Vic Eldred @12.1.5    4 years ago

256

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
12.1.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.6    4 years ago

I think we all got it the first time.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
12.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @12.1.8    4 years ago

I forgot how important it was for some to have the last word.

You may proceed.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
12.1.11  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.6    4 years ago

That feeling is mutual as to what you and any who oppose Trump thinks, period.  

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
13  It Is ME    4 years ago

Breaking News: Dems PISSED ! Trump DID what all of congress has been talking about doing for a decade. Time to "Impeach Trump" ……. AGAIN !

Ain't it great when someone that runs for office.....WINS..... and does things they said they would do, that congress has talked about doing back in the days, that they NEVER did ? jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
13.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  It Is ME @13    4 years ago

Agreed. Like my new seed there is all these Trump accomplishments and the progressives don’t like any of them because Trump....

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Guide
13.1.1  It Is ME  replied to  XXJefferson51 @13.1    4 years ago
progressives don’t like any of them because Trump....

They're all focused on "Tweets". 

Trumps "Plan" is working wonderfully.

"Oh Look..... there's a Squirrel" ! "Lefties" grab their binoculars. jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
14  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

 
 

Who is online

Ronin2
Kavika
Igknorantzruls
Sean Treacy


87 visitors