The Fall of a Media Icon

  
By:  Vic Eldred  •  9 months ago  •  137 comments


The Fall of a Media Icon
“Bif: If I were you, the last thing I would be doing is referencing other people getting out of federal prison. Because after you are indicted, you will likely be passing them on your way in. BTW, they don’t have silver spoons or gold toilets in the joint. Buckle up Buttercup.”

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People


Once upon a time there was a lawyer who represented a porn star. He became a media darling not because he representing a porn star, but because he was representing her in a case against a President the media despised. In the case of the porn star he sought to invalidate a nondisclosure agreement involving the President. I never understood how one can simply violate an agreement in which the person has already accepted payment for their silence. I guess my instincts were right - he lost that one big time. A federal judge dismissed the defamation lawsuit and ordered the infamous "Stormy" Daniels to pay President Trump's legal fees. That fact, like many others, got lost along the way. It seems the cocky lawyer, who threatened to take down a President, had become a beloved figure by the left wing media.

The lawyer became a household name. His name was Michael Avenatti and his road to stardom was paved with his attacks on the President via various legal issues from Stormy Daniels to Michael Cohen. In the end he was exposed as a devious liar, but prior to his downfall, he was heralded as the man who would take down Trump!



The media even fancied him as a presidential candidate!  It seems the only media outlet not to be taken in was Fox News. As a matter of fact it was Fox's own Tucker Carlson who challenged him to come on his show. Tucker had already been describing him as " the creepy porn lawyer. " Avenatti accepted and it didn't go well for Avenatti. Funny, how easy it is to stand up to a bully. Well done Tucker! Fox News can stand tall at a time when American journalism no longer exists in certain places.



In 2018, during the Kavanaugh hearings, Avenatti announced that he had a client who made additional allegations against Kavanaugh, as both a witness and a victim of his inappropriate behavior, and that she would soon come forward publicly. She turned out to be yet another of the false accusers rolled out during the democrats scheme to defame & topple Judicial nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

Thus began the fall of America's most vocal celebrity lawyer. To date Michael Avenatti has been indicted on charges of extortion, fraud, and embezzlement - including stealing millions from a paraplegic client. Prosecutors maintain that Avenatti continued to engage in criminal acts even after his indictment.

But what of the media which once had him appearing on TV on an almost daily basis?  They worshiped the man because of all the mean spirited things he said about the President. Now they are silent. Avenatti's once infamous boast's against the President and his son are hard to find on the internet. It's like he never existed.

Avenatti will get the justice he earned, but what of the liberal media?

Where is their reckoning?


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
Vic Eldred
1  author  Vic Eldred    9 months ago

Fame can be fleeting!


Rules of Civility apply

 
 
 
Tessylo
2  Tessylo    9 months ago

How is Avanetti a 'media icon'?  Excuse me, a 'left wing media icon'

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2    9 months ago

I refer you to the film in the article.

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    9 months ago

I will not watch Tucker squinty Carlson

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
2.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.1    9 months ago

So you don't listen to things that make you uncomfortable?  I understand.

 
 
 
Tessylo
2.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    9 months ago

Listening to lies does make me uncomfortable.

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1.4  MAGA  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.3    9 months ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tacos!
2.3  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @2    9 months ago
How is Avanetti a 'media icon'?  Excuse me, a 'left wing media icon'

CNN, MSNBC Have Given Stormy Daniels Lawyer Michael Avenatti $175 Million in Earned Media

108 appearances by Avenatti on MSNBC and CNN over a 64-day period from March 7 to May 10

108 appearances. In only two months. There aren’t even 108  days in two months! Worth $175 million. That’s how.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
2.3.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Tacos! @2.3    9 months ago

And that's not counting his appearances on left wing broadcast networks. 

Published   April 11 

The Media Research Center has  determined  that Avenatti made a whopping 254 television appearances over the course of a year

Avenatti appeared most frequently on CNN, which welcomed him an astonishing 121 times. MSNBC also had a high tally, having him on 108 times. He made 24 appearances on broadcast news; 12 on ABC, seven on CBS and five on NBC.

Avenatti appeared on Fox News twice.

Roughly 70 percent of his television appearances took place between March and June of 2018 as his client’s legal battle with the president repeatedly made headlines.  

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/lawyer-michael-avenatti-254-tv-appearances-prior-to-legal-troubles

 
 
 
Tessylo
3  Tessylo    9 months ago

How is that the press 'hates' tRump for reporting the truth?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3    9 months ago

Are you now saying that Trump reports the truth?

 
 
 
Tessylo
3.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    9 months ago

I meant to say that how is that the press hates the 'president' when the press reports the truth/video/quotes, etc. that the 'president' spouts?

You knew exactly what I meant.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.1    9 months ago

Just asking.  I'm inquisitive like you are.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
4  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Avenetti is one of those things that get flushed down the progressive memory hole.  

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1  MUVA  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    9 months ago

Remember Avenetti is the new face or just the face of the democratic party.

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @4.1    9 months ago

How so?

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1.2  MUVA  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.1    9 months ago

You don't remember the article when he was going to bring down the president he was the darling of the democrats to the rest of us he was the creepy porn lawyer.

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @4.1.2    9 months ago

Yeah, I see you got the 'creepy porn lawyer' from the 'article'.  Do you have any original thoughts?

I do remember him.  I don't remember any dems/libs/progressives claiming he was the darling of the democrats, just the 'right' claiming that.  

So what?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.3    9 months ago
Yeah, I see you got the 'creepy porn lawyer' from the 'article'.

Actually, it's been used quite a bit. Tucker Carlson should get the credit.

 
 
 
MUVA
4.1.5  MUVA  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.4    9 months ago

That is where I got it.Later I will go back and find the article about creepy and all the glowing things said about him on this very site and by some on this seed.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  MUVA @4.1.5    9 months ago

Background always helps, especially when some want to forget unpleasant details.

 
 
 
Tessylo
4.1.8  Tessylo  replied to  MUVA @4.1.5    9 months ago

If you say so.  I won't hold my breath on that though.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.7    9 months ago

The only thing I remember about Avenatti is that some "progressives" thought he could be used against Trump in the sense that the best way to fight sleaze like Trump is with another sleaze.  No one thought Avenatti was anything other than an egomaniac opportunist, which is exactly what Trump was/is. They would have deserved each other. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
4.1.10  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.9    9 months ago
The only thing I remember about Avenatti

Ah, and I thought you had a good memory


that some "progressives" thought he could be used against Trump in the sense that the best way to fight sleaze like Trump is with another sleaze.

No John, the media wasn't calling Avenatti sleaze (Fox was the exception). That's why I posted the films - to refresh memories.


No one thought Avenatti was anything other than an egomaniac opportunist

The films John, look at the films!

 
 
 
Kathleen
4.2  Kathleen  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    9 months ago

He was a loser.

 
 
 
Tessylo
5  Tessylo    9 months ago

'In the end he was exposed as a devious liar'

You mean the 'president'?

 
 
 
It Is ME
6  It Is ME    9 months ago

Avenatti, Parnas….etc....jrSmiley_97_smiley_image.gif

Liberal/Left types, do hang their hats on some GREAT folks to sooth their TDS, don't they ! 

 
 
 
The Magic Eight Ball
8  The Magic Eight Ball    9 months ago

is he still running for president?  LOL

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
8.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  The Magic Eight Ball @8    9 months ago

I kind of knew when he was predicting that Don Jr was going to jail, that it would be Avenatti who was destined for a steel cage.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
9  JohnRussell    9 months ago

The world has moved on from Michael Avenatti, quite a while ago actually. 

Not a surprise that right wing extremists,  who are active members of the demented cult of Trump, would try and make something significant out of whats left of any interest in Avenatti. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.1  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @9    9 months ago

Amen!

Keep digging up the past, to deflect from this 'president's impeachment and wrongdoing and lies.

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @9    9 months ago

Looners on the left are quick to move on from all things that have blown up in their collective faces like Stormy Daniels, Avenatti and every other hoax they’ve tried to pull.    They have to if they want to protect their fake narratives

Your attempts at resisting/denying the truth are childlike in nature.    You are fooling no one.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
9.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @9.3    9 months ago

Your'e just upset because Stormy Daniels told the world that Trump's dick was smaller than average and shaped like a mushroom.   Too disillusioning. 

Ok Sparty, go back through my comments and find one where I say Avenatti is the second coming and will solve all the country's problems and should be our national leader.   I'll wait right here. 

His usefulness was in his willingness to get dirty and harsh with Trump. Big deal. 

When it turned out he was a crook like Trump too , it ended his usefulness. When was the last time you saw a "progressive" bringing up Avenatti?  A year ago?

Dont embarrass yourself any further. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.1    9 months ago
it ended his usefulness. When was the last time you saw a "progressive" bringing up Avenatti?  A year ago?

So you do admit that progressives are willing to get in bed with anything to destroy Trump? Be it Avenatti or Iran!  And yes, that was part of my point - progressives have stopped bringing up Avenatti. They would like us all to forget it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
9.3.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.3.2    9 months ago

The difference between progressives and right wingers is when someone is shown to be a scum bag the progressives drop him. 

When someone is shown to the right wingers to be a scumbag they elect him president. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.3    9 months ago
The difference between progressives and right wingers is when someone is shown to be a scum bag the progressives drop him. 

You mean like Ted Kennedy?


When someone is shown to the right wingers to be a scumbag they elect him president. 

We vote for what's best for this country, not on identity politics and envy....that's the difference

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3.5  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.1    9 months ago

Lol, I’m not the one who should be embarrassed John.    Your body of work here speaks for itself for anyone who has paid a modicum of attention to it

Hate on brother, hate on.

 
 
 
It Is ME
9.3.6  It Is ME  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.3    9 months ago
The difference between progressives and right wingers is when someone is shown to be a scum bag the progressives drop him. 

Lizzy's still around, and running for President of this country too ! jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3.7  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.3    9 months ago

Most progressives have their heads shoved so squarely up their rear ends they haven’t seen the light of day for years.

Progressive = Fascist in training

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.3.8  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.3.2    9 months ago

He was forgotten by us, until y'all brought him up.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
9.3.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @9.3.5    9 months ago

I'm not the Trump supporter between the two of us.  

All I have done is show the truth about the asshole that you support to be president of the United States.  You are the one with the problem. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.10  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @9.3.8    9 months ago

Your'e welcome

 
 
 
JohnRussell
9.3.11  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.3.4    9 months ago

Vic, when Trump says he could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and not lose a vote, he is thinking of you. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3.12  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.9    9 months ago

No problems here.   None at all.     I’m so happy these days I could be whistling zippity do da day out my rear end

Life is good John, sorry you appear to not be enjoying it.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
9.3.13  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sparty On @9.3.7    9 months ago
Progressive = Fascist in training

What total bullshit. Apparently you've either forgotten or never learned what fascism actually is.

Fascism: noun - a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

The white nationalism and support for the wannabe dictator dishonest Donald are far closer to the definition of fascism than progressives who want justice and equality for all.

"(Kim Jong Un) speaks and his people sit up at attention,I want my people to do the same." - Donald J Trump

“Anybody wants to come in. Dictators? It’s OK. Come on in. Whatever’s good for the United States. We want to help our people,” - Donald J Trump

“With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License?” - Donald J Trump

Most Trump supporters = experienced fascists.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.14  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.11    9 months ago
when Trump says he could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and not lose a vote, he is thinking of you. 

But John, the people he really hooked with that one were people like you. You have quoted that line many times. It really got to you. It's like when Barak Obama called his grandmother "a typical white person." I could never dismiss it

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.3.13    9 months ago

Could you give us the link where your definition came from?

 
 
 
Ender
9.3.16  Ender  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.11    9 months ago

512

 
 
 
Texan1211
9.3.17  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.3.14    9 months ago

The shooting folks on 5th avenue quote is like the "Trump loves the poorly educated"--like Democrats don't or something?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.18  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @9.3.17    9 months ago

They can quote him verbatim. Iv'e never seen anything like it. It's even beyond the people who like to quote the Bible. Progressives will be forever linked to Donald Trump!

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3.19  Sparty On  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.3.13    9 months ago

Ah but history tells us a different story.

Historically speaking Fascism has been a type hyper nationalism that rejects individual liberty.    Rejecting individual liberty?    That’s progressive territory not conservative.

Fascism has usually been hostile to religion.    More progressive territory not conservative.  

Mussolini, arguably the original Fascist, more or less invented the totalitarism of Fascism.     Working towards a society where everybody belonged, where everyone was taken care of, where everything was inside the state and nothing was outside of the state.     Sounds like a progressive to me

The only BS here is the supposition that progressives can’t have fascist tendencies.    They can and do.

 
 
 
Tessylo
9.3.20  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.3.10    9 months ago

'Your'e welcome

For what?

 
 
 
Ender
9.3.21  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @9.3.19    9 months ago
Historically speaking Fascism has been a type hyper nationalism

And which side is promoting hyper nationalism....

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
9.3.22  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.3.15    9 months ago
Could you give us the link where your definition came from?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.23  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.3.22    9 months ago

Thanks

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
9.3.25  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ender @9.3.21    9 months ago
And which side is promoting hyper nationalism....

Sadly, they're apparently not able to self reflect. Many are the blind, stuffed in a sack of stupid shoved inside dishonest Donald's voluminous rectum. They're like a Trumpduckin...

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3.26  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @9.3.21    9 months ago

That’s largely fabricated in the TDS ridden mind but give me call when a brown shirt knocks on your door.    I’ll be the first person there to defend you.

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3.27  Sparty On  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.3.25    9 months ago

Sadly The TDS ridden just can’t seem to shake the butthurt.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.28  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ender @9.3.21    9 months ago

Nationalism is best described as an identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.

Does anyone want to debate that?

 
 
 
It Is ME
9.3.29  It Is ME  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.3.25    9 months ago
Sadly, they're apparently not able to self reflect.

I need help ! jrSmiley_15_smiley_image.gif

Tell us how YOU do it ? jrSmiley_32_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ender
9.3.30  Ender  replied to  Sparty On @9.3.26    9 months ago
Nationalism and patriotism both show the relationship of an individual towards his or her nation. The two are often confused and frequently believed to mean the same thing. However, there is a vast difference between nationalism and patriotism.

Nationalism means to give more importance to unity by way of a cultural background, including language and heritage. Patriotism pertains to the love for a nation, with more emphasis on values and beliefs.

When talking about nationalism and patriotism, one cannot avoid the famous quotation by   George Orwell , who said that nationalism is ‘the worst enemy of peace’. According to him, nationalism is a feeling that one’s country is superior to another in all respects, while patriotism is merely a feeling of admiration for a way of life. These concepts show that patriotism is passive by nature and nationalism can be a little aggressive.

Patriotism is based on affection and nationalism is rooted in rivalry and resentment. One can say that nationalism is militant by nature and patriotism is based on peace.

Most nationalists assume that their country is better than any other, whereas patriots believe that their country is one of the best and can be improved in many ways. Patriots tend to believe in friendly relations with other countries while some nationalists don’t.

In patriotism, people all over the world are considered equal but   nationalism   implies that only the people belonging to one’s own country should be considered one’s equal.

A patriotic person tends to tolerate criticism and tries to learn something new from it, but a nationalist cannot tolerate any criticism and considers it an insult.

Nationalism makes one to think only of one’s country’s virtues and not its deficiencies. Nationalism can also make one contemptuous of the virtues of other nations. Patriotism, on the other hand, pertains to value responsibilities rather than just valuing loyalty towards one’s own country.

Nationalism makes one try to find justification for mistakes made in the past, while patriotism enables people to understand both the shortcomings and improvements made.

Summary:

Patriot: Expresses the emotion of love towards his country in a passive way

Nationalist: Strives for independence and the interests and domination of a nation and expresses his love or concern for the country in an active political way.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.31  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ender @9.3.30    9 months ago

Obviously, that is an opinion piece. Can we have a link?

 
 
 
Ender
9.3.32  Ender  replied to  Vic Eldred @9.3.31    9 months ago

Yes it is an opinion. Imo a very accurate one.

Link is first word.

 
 
 
Sparty On
9.3.33  Sparty On  replied to  Ender @9.3.30    9 months ago
9.3.19
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
9.3.34  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ender @9.3.32    9 months ago
Yes it is an opinion.

I was wondering why you wouldn't simply return to Merriam-Webster, which gives a contrast of Patriotism vs Nationalism. BTW nobody here seems to think they are one in the same.

Imo a very accurate one.

Actually it puts Nationalism in a negative light. I wonder why?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
9.3.35  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  It Is ME @9.3.29    9 months ago
Tell us how YOU do it ?

It's not that hard. Just take a deep breathe, accept that Bill Clinton was a lying scum bag adulterer like many politicians, which in no way excuses other lying scum bag adulterers like dishonest Donald. Realize that you don't have to take sides, you can condemn them both as both are reprehensible bastards. Try and understand that you are the only one who should get to decide your own standards of morality, don't let others make those decisions for you, whether coming from the left or the right. Stop letting yourself be manipulated into defending worthless scum bags like Avenatti, Trump or Clinton due to some desperate desire to belong to one side or another. Condemn bullshit wherever it may rear its stinky brown head.

 
 
 
It Is ME
9.3.36  It Is ME  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.3.35    9 months ago

So....Relax....Breath....and Not look at politics as a "Personal" thing, but look at "Politics" as a "Policy" thing ?

I think I've been doing that all this time. jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

How 'bout You ? jrSmiley_87_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
9.3.37  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  It Is ME @9.3.36    9 months ago
I think I've been doing that all this time

That's truly funny. I've been reading your comments for about two years now and I've never once gotten that impression.

 
 
 
It Is ME
9.3.38  It Is ME  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.3.37    9 months ago
I've been reading your comments for about two years now and I've never once gotten that impression.

Soooooo…. you've read that I've been worried about Trumps "Past" personal Life, his "Tweets", and his demeanor as  President ?

 
 
 
Greg Jones
9.3.39  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @9.3.1    9 months ago
When was the last time you saw a "progressive" bringing up Avenatti?  A year ago?

The leftists are the ones who are being embarrassed by following fake and frivolous follies.

Everything they try blows up in the faces. Did you know that even if Trump was removed from office///

that he could legally run for reelection. .

 
 
 
KDMichigan
9.3.40  KDMichigan  replied to  Ender @9.3.16    9 months ago

Yeah cute meme of something he never said, Isn't that a Nazi tactic, repeat a lie enough times until people actually start to believe it?

 
 
 
Ender
9.3.41  Ender  replied to  KDMichigan @9.3.40    9 months ago

Why not? republicans do it all the time.

 
 
 
MUVA
9.5  MUVA  replied to  JohnRussell @9    9 months ago

You are so quick to throw your savior under the bus who’s next Schitt?

 
 
 
Kathleen
10  Kathleen    9 months ago

Geez.... looks like some are taking up for this guy.... Then they have the nerve to tell some they are taking up for Trump.

Hypocrisy big time.

I am not seeing some say this guy did wrong.. sound familiar?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
10.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Kathleen @10    9 months ago
Geez.... looks like some are taking up for this guy.... Then they have the nerve to tell some they are taking up for Trump. Hypocrisy big time.

Utter nonsense.  Kathleen please give us the number of one comment on this seed where someone is "taking up for this guy."

 
 
 
Kathleen
10.1.1  Kathleen  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1    9 months ago

Read #12.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
10.1.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Kathleen @10.1.1    9 months ago

That is not a valid link. 

 
 
 
Kathleen
10.1.3  Kathleen  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.2    9 months ago

No, my comment. I should have put ( comment 12)

 
 
 
It Is ME
10.1.4  It Is ME  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.2    9 months ago
That is not a valid link.

512

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
10.1.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  It Is ME @10.1.4    9 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JohnRussell
10.1.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Kathleen @10.1.3    9 months ago

Ok, I thought you said someone was taking up for the guy. What you want is more criticism of the guy. 

I stopped thinking about him the day he got arrested for stealing his clients money.  The only people who still care about him seem to be conservatives. 

 
 
 
Kathleen
10.1.7  Kathleen  replied to  JohnRussell @10.1.6    9 months ago

Not too good John....

 
 
 
Texan1211
10.2  Texan1211  replied to  Kathleen @10    9 months ago

I see what you did there.

Great job!

I am almost positive that the person won't recognize it. though!

jrSmiley_7_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Kathleen
10.2.1  Kathleen  replied to  Texan1211 @10.2    9 months ago

I know.... but I just had to say it. : )

 
 
 
Tessylo
11  Tessylo    9 months ago

No one is taking up for him.  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
11.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @11    9 months ago

So why are you defending him instead of criticizing him?

 
 
 
Kathleen
12  Kathleen    9 months ago

Well then.... let’s hear some criticism about the guy...

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
12.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Kathleen @12    9 months ago

I was amazed by the lack of criticism also. Seems to me that everyone should be able to agree this nobody with nothing burgers on the side should be easily dismissed and given good riddance status. The lack of that shows that some still held and  hold the hope that he would have brought Mr. Trump to his knees. Thing is, Congress isn't even going to be able to and this narcissistic prick thought he was God and had him by the short hairs. 

I looked back, using the search feature, to former NT articles with Avenatti in it. Not much of the commentary has changed. 

Sis boom bah....................

 
 
 
Tessylo
12.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @12.1    9 months ago

No one ever said Avenatti would bring this 'president' to his knees.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
12.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @12.1    9 months ago
I was amazed by the lack of criticism also

As am I. How anyone can look at the long history of disgusting comments, abuse of power, obstruction of justice, obstruction of congress, is currently an unindicted coconspirator in an illegal campaign finance case where his coconspirator is already serving jail time, has been credibly accused by more than two dozen women of sexual assault which he himself described saying he doesn't "even wait" for consent and just grabs women he finds attractive "by the pussy". The monumental lack of criticism from right wing media is deafening and proof that whenever they get all angry and bitter over the left not coming down harder on law breakers and scum bags that they're really just scum bag hypocrites themselves desperate to deflect and distract from their own failings.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
12.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.1.2    9 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

yes, but.... Hillary. jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
12.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.1.2    9 months ago

That's pretty tired and also, not the topic at hand. Got anything to say about Avenatti or is Kathleen right on the mark?

Give you an "A" for deflection though. You never disappoint with your long winded op/ed's.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
12.1.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @12.1.4    9 months ago
Got anything to say about Avenatti or is Kathleen right on the mark?

Try reading my comment (12.2) from a half hour before your sad attempt to counsel me.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
12.1.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.1.5    9 months ago

I saw that and for dessert, you just had to stick in your "but Trump"

he's a total scum bag, but so is the current President of the United States,

Again, I don't think Trump is the subject but if it helps you concentrate and get through the day, keep it coming. You're a good read........................

 
 
 
Jasper2529
12.1.9  Jasper2529  replied to  Tessylo @12.1.1    9 months ago

deleted.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
12.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Kathleen @12    9 months ago

Avenatti is a self-promoting ambulance chasing scum bag that virtually no one had heard of before he chased Stormy's ambulance. The fact that CNN and other media outlets gave him a soap box isn't really that unusual, the "media" has let all sorts of crazy people express themselves on the networks. They've given air time to the likes of David Meade and many other nut job "doomsday" predicters. Heck, all the news networks, right wing and left, give the most air time ever to a known liar with over 15,000 confirmed lies, is an unindicted coconspirator in an illegal campaign finance scheme who has been accused of sexual assault by more than two dozen credible women. I have no problem criticizing Avenatti, he's a total scum bag, but so is the current President of the United States, so I have a hard time placing any blame on the media for their coverage of his claims.

 
 
 
It Is ME
12.2.1  It Is ME  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.2    9 months ago
The fact that CNN and other media outlets gave him a soap box isn't really that unusual

Definitely not when it comes to CNN, MSNBC and other "left" media outlets these days....for sure !

https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/28/cnn-and-msnbc-made-shakedown-artist-michael-avenatti-a-household-name/

Avenatti was interviewed on broadcast and cable news networks 214 times in 2018, spanning from March to November. Presumably, the only reason the invitations eventually came to halt was Avenatti’s November 14 arrest for allegations of domestic abuse.

The Media Research Center found that in a 10-week span last spring, from March to May, Avenatti was interviewed a whopping 147 times. Neither of those totals include additional segments about Avenatti, where he was the subject of news, but not interviewed. In 2018, CNN gave him the most airtime, with 107 live interviews. MSNBC came in a close second at 81.

Avenatti had a similar marathon run on Sept. 26, the day he revealed the identity of his client, the third Kavanaugh accuser. In less than 24 hours, starting on MSNBC and ending with an appearance on “Good Morning America,” he was interviewed on nine different television shows. At one point, he bounced from CNN at 9:00 to MSNBC at 10:00, then back to Don Lemon’s show on CNN in the same hour.

CNN hosts did not just reserve their affection for Avenatti to working hours. They invited him to their parties, and lauded his ambitions to run for president in 2020.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
12.2.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  It Is ME @12.2.1    9 months ago
Definitely not when it comes to CNN, MSNBC and other "left" media outlets these days....for sure !

Should I link all the air time FOX gave to the longest sitting Republican speaker of the House Dennis Hastert? You know, the Republican who raped kids and then paid millions to try and keep them quiet. He was often given a soap box at Fox and other right wing media outlets. I'm sure they had no clue as to his criminal activities, much like CNN had no clue about Avenatti's illicit acts. Are we really going to go back through everyone the right and left have given air time to in some moronic attempt at one ups-man-ship? It seems rather ridiculous and doesn't actually prove anything about any of the networks other than they're all willing to give air time to anything they think might get them ratings.

 
 
 
It Is ME
12.2.3  It Is ME  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.2.2    9 months ago

Does that have anything to do with Avenatti and the "Lefts" media blitz on making him their "relevant" source against trump ?

 
 
 
Jasper2529
12.2.4  Jasper2529  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.2.2    9 months ago
Should I link all the air time FOX gave to the longest sitting Republican speaker of the House Dennis Hastert?

Q: Are Fox and Hastert the topic?

A: No.

 
 
 
Kathleen
12.2.5  Kathleen  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.2    9 months ago

Referring to your first sentence, now that wasn’t so bad was it? 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
12.2.6  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jasper2529 @12.2.4    9 months ago
Q: Are Fox and Hastert the topic?

They are when others here are trying to claim that only "left wing" media outlets give criminals a platform to dispense their bullshit. Trying to claim this is a "left wing" only problem is beyond dishonest. I have no problem calling out the slime when I see it regardless of what network it's on. Avenatti is a slime ball, so was Denny Hastert and dozen of other high ranking Republicans through the years who spouted off on right wing news networks then were found out to be disgusting criminals. Is that the fault of the networks?

 
 
 
Kathleen
12.2.7  Kathleen  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @12.2    9 months ago

Well I do blame the media when they jump to conclusions before they do any research. Not to mention how quick they are to pass judgment on people AND they voice their own opinions, which I really don’t want to hear.

 
 
 
Tessylo
13  Tessylo    9 months ago

Read #12 would indicate that you're taking up for the guy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
14  author  Vic Eldred    9 months ago

Final thoughts:

Michael Avenatti, got what he deserved. As for the dishonest liberal media, which gave him a platform & promoted him, there have been no consequences. Everything they have done seems to be absolved with a simple retraction/apology.

There were two exceptions. One is CNN which has suffered a dramatic loss of viewership and has made a settlement with Nick Sandman amid other lawsuits.

The other - Fox News which has stood alone, never taken in by Avenatti or the Russia hoax.

Good night all

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

zuksam


56 visitors