Joe Biden Is Either Incapable, Or Unwilling, To Stand Up To The Radical Leftist Mob

  
Via:  1776 Traditional American  •  3 months ago  •  25 comments

By:   Mercedes V. Schlapp

Joe Biden Is Either Incapable, Or Unwilling, To Stand Up To The Radical Leftist Mob
Joe Biden’s refusal to acknowledge anti-American behavior by radical-left wing provocateurs and professional anarchists behind the violence is telling — he is incapable of leading from the front, choosing instead to capitulate to the radical left in order to advance his own political ambitions. While President Trump gears up for a full travel schedule to speak directly to the American people, Joe Biden sticks mostly to the basement of his home.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

President Trump is doing a great job guiding America through perilous Times and restoring us while putting America first.  Trump had America going great before the China virus and the left wing looting and rioting mobs.  Biden is in sympathy with both and won’t stand up to China as a threat to America nor will he reign in the agitators and anarchists acting on his behalf.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



President Donald Trump is back on the road to energize and connect directly with the American people. The president is most at home when he is outside the swamp, sharing his aspirational vision for the future.

As America continues toward a safe and full reopening, it’s more important than ever before to contrast President Trump’s bold leadership throughout the pandemic and recovery, with Joe Biden’s weakness and blatant attempt to politicize the pandemic for political gain.

While President Trump hosted his first rally in months Saturday from Oklahoma, Biden has now gone 82 days without a press conference and the media should be asking — at what point will Biden subject himself to the scrutiny American voters deserve when considering who to elect as the next President of the United States?

Biden’s weakness and inability to lead the country is a threat to us all. He’s unfit to be president.

While President Trump and his administration focus on safely reopening the greatest economy in the world, Joe Biden continues to lob ineffective attacks from his basement while continuing to try and score cheap political points through divisive rhetoric and fear.

Defunding and dismantling the police is now a serious policy proposal being pushed by leading Democrats, such as Sen. Kamala Harris and Rep. Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez, and Joe Biden has been slow to push back in any meaningful way. 

For example, Biden remains silent on the professional anarchists and radical leftists currently occupying a major section of downtown Seattle.

Despite campaign press releases and incomplete statements, Joe Biden owns the radical left’s mission to defund and eliminate law enforcement as the standard bearer for the Democrat Party. By refusing to denounce the dangerous rhetoric of others within his party, Biden is leaving open the door for a future where law enforcement’s ability to protect and serve is severely diminished.

Contrast Biden’s weakness to President Trump’s strength. The president stands with America’s law enforcement communities while recognizing the need to constantly stay up on policies and procedures to keep communities safe and allow law enforcement to do their jobs.

And while Biden is hesitant to criticize objectively dangerous and destructive policies that will hurt the American people, especially the most vulnerable among us, he has no problem criticizing the men and women of law enforcement if he thinks it’ll serve his political ambitions.

In Seattle, police are unable to respond to emergencies, and had to shut down a precinct, which is tripling response times and leading to unresolved criminal behavior.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden remains silent even as Seattle’s Police Chief reports how conditions have quickly deteriorated in what the radical left is calling the “Autonomous Zone.”

“Rapes, robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we’re not able to get to them,” Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best recently said.

Joe Biden’s refusal to acknowledge anti-American behavior by radical-left wing provocateurs and professional anarchists behind the violence is telling — he is incapable of leading from the front, choosing instead to capitulate to the radical left in order to advance his own political ambitions.

While President Trump gears up for a full travel schedule to speak directly to the American people, Joe Biden sticks mostly to the basement of his home.

The contrast between President Trump’s pro-growth policies that protect economic opportunity for all Americans, and Joe Biden’s slow-growth, job-killing policies that decimated once great American cities and hurt working families could not be clearer.

President Trump ushered in a new era of innovation, economic opportunity, and economic growth that supercharged the American economy before it was artificially shut down by a global pandemic.

Biden, who has championed policies that shuttered small businesses and cost millions of Americans their jobs, sees the White House as just the next step in his half-century political career.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
MAGA
1  seeder  MAGA    3 months ago

Biden remains silent on the professional anarchists and radical leftists currently occupying a major section of downtown Seattle.

Despite campaign press releases and incomplete statements, Joe Biden owns the radical left’s mission to defund and eliminate law enforcement as the standard bearer for the Democrat Party. By refusing to denounce the dangerous rhetoric of others within his party, Biden is leaving open the door for a future where law enforcement’s ability to protect and serve is severely diminished.

Contrast Biden’s weakness to President Trump’s strength. The president stands with America’s law enforcement communities while recognizing the need to constantly stay up on policies and procedures to keep communities safe and allow law enforcement to do their jobs.

And while Biden is hesitant to criticize objectively dangerous and destructive policies that will hurt the American people, especially the most vulnerable among us, he has no problem criticizing the men and women of law enforcement if he thinks it’ll serve his political ambitions.

In Seattle, police are unable to respond to emergencies, and had to shut down a precinct, which is tripling response times and leading to unresolved criminal behavior.

Meanwhile, Joe Biden remains silent even as Seattle’s Police Chief reports how conditions have quickly deteriorated in what the radical left is calling the “Autonomous Zone.”

“Rapes, robberies and all sorts of violent acts have been occurring in the area and we’re not able to get to them,” Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best recently said.

Joe Biden’s refusal to acknowledge anti-American behavior by radical-left wing provocateurs and professional anarchists behind the violence is telling — he is incapable of leading from the front, choosing instead to capitulate to the radical left in order to advance his own political ambitions. https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/8943/joe-biden-is-either-incapable-or-unwilling-to-stand-up-to-the-radical-leftist-mob

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  MAGA @1    3 months ago
By refusing to denounce the dangerous rhetoric of others within his party

Trump called the Nazi's marching in the streets "fine people" instead of really denouncing the Nazi's, white supremacists and KKK member within his party. I think most reasonable sane patriotic Americans will stick with Biden on this one instead of going with the racist king of lies and dangerous rhetoric dirty Donald.

 
 
 
bugsy
1.1.1  bugsy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1    3 months ago
Trump called the Nazi's marching in the streets "fine people"

Not true but you already knew that.

I bet CNN and MSDNC did not tell you Biden called the Daughters of the Confederacy, who some chapters have known ties to the KKK "fine people" back in 1993, did they?

https://nypost.com/2020/06/16/joe-biden-once-called-female-confederacy-group-fine-people/

But because he has the almighty "D" next to his name, him calling them fine people is absolutely OK with you.

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @1.1.2    3 months ago

You REALLY should learn the difference between TRUMP saying something and others--who he has NO control over, saying something.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  bugsy @1.1.1    3 months ago
Not true but you already knew that.

It's amazing how they persist in that falsehood.  No matter how many times it's pointed out to them, they still parrot false talking points.

And, of course, they ignore that Biden called people who actually built monuments to the KKK, fine people. 

It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. 

 
 
 
bugsy
1.1.5  bugsy  replied to  JBB @1.1.2    3 months ago

So some guy that is the "leader" of probably a dozen people, most of whom are probably family members, endorses Trump.....and you feel the need to point that out,

but Biden telling a group of people, whose membership is in the thousands, and have ties to the KKK nationwide, that they are fine people, and you intentionally gloss over that.

And that is why Americans are finding that most of the racism in this country is coming from the left, not the right.

 
 
 
MAGA
1.1.6  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JBB @1.1.2    3 months ago

But Trump! Lol@u!  jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.1.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  bugsy @1.1.1    3 months ago
Not true but you already knew that

Trump: "Yes, I think there’s blame on both sides. If you look at both sides -- I think there’s blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it, and you don’t have any doubt about it either. And if you reported it accurately, you would say."

Reporter: "The neo-Nazis started this. They showed up in Charlottesville to protest --"

Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.

So Trump did refer to the group that contained white supremacists, KKK member and neo-Nazi's as "fine people". It's a fact.

“I, too, heard that speech and, for the public listening to this, the senator made a very moving and eloquent speech," Biden said, referring to remarks by then-Alabama Democratic Sen. Howell Thomas Heflin. "As a son of the Confederacy, acknowledging that it was time to change and yield to a position that Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun raised on the Senate floor, not granting a federal charter to an organization made up of many fine people who continue to display the Confederate flag as a symbol.”

I wouldn't have called them "fine people" but the confederate flag was a lot more common back in the 1980's and early '90's, heck, you couldn't go to an elementary school back then without seeing a dozen Dukes of Hazards lunch boxes with confederate flags on them. But Biden's comment in context from nearly 30 years ago is no where near the equivalent to the one Trump made within the last two years about actual, literal Nazi's marching with tiki torches chanting "Jews will not replace us!". But nice attempt at another pointless irrelevant "whataboutism".

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.7    3 months ago
xcuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides

That's some chop job. Here it is, in context:

"Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group.  But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides.  You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures you did.  You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”

followed by 

"And you had people -- and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly."

As anyone with a fifth grade reading comprehension can tell, Trump was distinguishing between those who protested the destruction of a statute, and the neo-nazis, who he unequivocally condemned. It's just  a matter of reading in context, which is why no respectable left wing outlet claims Trump called neo-nazi's very fine people.  Any audience capable of reading a transcript knows how dishonest the claim is. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
1.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.8    3 months ago
As anyone with a fifth grade reading comprehension can tell, Trump was distinguishing between those who protested the destruction of a statute, and the neo-nazis, who he unequivocally condemned.

Trump is incapable of "distinguishing".  Why is it that people have to interpret what he says all the time? Do you want to know ? 

He wants to spread confusion and misinformation as much as possible. He lives for chaos. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.10  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.9    3 months ago

hy is it that people have to interpret what he says all the time

Is that  a road you want to go down with Biden? One of the last times he was in public you had to explain why he couldn't tell the difference between his wife and his sister.

Trump's statement  doesn't need interpreting, it just needs to be published in full. 

Just like with  Biden's endorsement of a group that put up monuments to the KKK, the meaning  is clear. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
1.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.9    3 months ago
Trump is incapable of "distinguishing". 

Then why was he able to give you a quote from Trump doing EXACTLY that?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.1.12  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.8    3 months ago
As anyone with a fifth grade reading comprehension can tell, Trump was distinguishing between those who protested the destruction of a statute, and the neo-nazis, who he unequivocally condemned.

There is no real difference between the two. If you're standing there shoulder to shoulder with Nazi's and the KKK just because you have a shared goal, perhaps you should rethink your position.

"You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”

Yes, worthless piece of shit racist scum desperate to protect the memory of a worthless piece of shit scumbag racist.

Nazi's "Don't you dare take down that statue of a racist I revere!"

Others in the crowd with the Nazi's "Don't you dare take down that statue of a racist I revere!"

See, no difference. I don't consider a single person who would stand shoulder to shoulder on the same side as Nazi's and white supremacists waving swastikas and confederate flags as a "fine" person no matter how much someone wants to try and twist and contort confederate history. The racist President disagrees, but then again, he's a fucking racist just like every single one of those in that crowd of Nazi's.

 
 
 
gooseisgone
1.1.13  gooseisgone  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.9    3 months ago
Trump is incapable of "distinguishing".  Why is it that people have to interpret what he says all the time?

Good fucking luck trying to figure out what Biden says, hell he can't complete three sentences without everyone going Whatttttttt.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
1.1.14  Sean Treacy  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.12    3 months ago
There is no real difference between the two

Now the goalposts are moving and we move to the ridiculous. Those who oppose the left's descent into full taliban mode of destroying monuments are now equal  "Nazis" 

So apparently, the 53% of DEMOCRATS who don't support the destruction of monuments are now full on Nazis. Think about how absurd your argument is. You are reduced to claiming the majority of Democrats are NO Different than Nazis. Despite most Democrats being no different than Nazis, you come on here and repeat Democratic talking points every day.  What does that make you?

Given the attacks on  monuments to abolitionists, Abe Lincoln,  WWII veterans,do you really need to have it pointed out to you why some non- Nazi's objected to removing statues? As Trump presciently pointed out, you start with Lee and then it's Washington and Jefferson. And now it's Lincoln and abolitionist heroes. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
1.1.15  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.14    3 months ago
So apparently, the 53% of DEMOCRATS who don't support the destruction of monuments are now full on Nazis.

Did I say that? Of course not. I said that those standing shoulder to shoulder with those Nazi's marching and chanting along side were no different than the Nazi's they were marching with. If there were democrats in that crowd then yes, they are just as bad as those they were marching with.

"Do not be deceived: “Bad company corrupts good morals.” - 1 Corinthians 15:33

What does that make you?

Obviously smart enough not to go march with a bunch of Nazi's. Nice try at false equivalency though, but it was hilariously disingenuous and ignorant.

Given the attacks on  monuments to abolitionists, Abe Lincoln,  WWII veterans,do you really need to have it pointed out to you why some non- Nazi's objected to removing statues?

First, were there Nazi's marching to protect those statues? No.

Second, I have not and would not condone the removal of those monuments to WWII veterans or Abraham Lincoln. While no man is perfect, neither Lincoln or any WWII vets abandoned their own humanity to fight to preserve their right to own humans as cattle.

As Trump presciently pointed out, you start with Lee and then it's Washington and Jefferson. 

What a stupid claim, but considering the source I'm not surprised. Trump is one of the dumbest most ignorant sacks of shit on the planet. Anyone listening to him for advice needs to have their heads examined.

I will admit there are some stupid people on the left who attack monuments they know little about, they are as ignorant and useless as the worthless bigots defending confederate monuments.

 
 
 
JBB
2  JBB    3 months ago

Only if you consider all those even slightly to the political left of Ghengis Kahn to be radicals...

 
 
 
MAGA
2.1  seeder  MAGA  replied to  JBB @2    3 months ago

The contrast between President Trump’s pro-growth policies that protect economic opportunity for all Americans, and Joe Biden’s slow-growth, job-killing policies that decimated once great American cities and hurt working families could not be clearer.

President Trump ushered in a new era of innovation, economic opportunity, and economic growth that supercharged the American economy before it was artificially shut down by a global pandemic.

Biden, who has championed policies that shuttered small businesses and cost millions of Americans their jobs, sees the White House as just the next step in his half-century political career. https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/8943/joe-biden-is-either-incapable-or-unwilling-to-stand-up-to-the-radical-leftist-mob#cm1342884

 
 
 
Ronin2
2.2  Ronin2  replied to  JBB @2    3 months ago

Unlike the left that consider everyone to the right of Lenin to to be radicals?

Pot meet kettle.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
3  Sean Treacy    3 months ago

Last night a leftist mob destroyed a statue of a abolitionist who saved slaves from slave catchers and beat a state legislator unconscious.  The left wing propaganda networks are too busy explaining how a  pulldown rope that's been in a garage for a year is somehow an act of terrorism to bother with actual violence so their leaders sit silently and do nothing. 

And rather than address their leaders tacit support of the violent mobs, they completely distort a quote from Trump to try and deflect. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
4  JohnRussell    3 months ago

The author of the seeded article is a professional propagandist, one whose husband is the organizer of the despicable CPAC , the annual Washington DC gathering of far right nut cases. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
4.2  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @4    3 months ago

Wow. I am absolutely shocked you would object to the source.

 
 
 
Tacos!
5  Tacos!    3 months ago

In defense of Handsy Joe, no one else is standing up to the idiots, either.

 
 
 
Ronin2
6  Ronin2    3 months ago

The answer is both.

Biden isn't able to stop the radicals from doing anything. He has no power over them and he knows it.  They will laugh off anything he says.

Biden also doesn't want to do anything to stop them, even if he could. The more chaos and disorder the US the better his wife and handlers believe his chances are of winning. The media is doing their part trying to blame Trump for Democratic mayors and governors unwillingness to stop these far left loons. Also, Biden needs these leftist morons to be ginned up until elections roll around. It is the only way they will come out and vote for him. If they calm down and retreat to their parents basements again, Joe will never be able to coerce them back out.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online


Thrawn 31
Old Hermit
CB
Tacos!


55 visitors