╌>

Masking the Truth: It’s not about the Virus, It’s about Obedience

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  4 years ago  •  55 comments

By:   Karen Kataline

Masking the Truth: It’s not about the Virus, It’s about Obedience
Democrat governors and other politicians are refusing to relinquish the “emergency powers” they awarded themselves to allow them to continue to impose lock downs and restrict businesses at their own whim. As if they somehow thought of it themselves, they act simultaneously to continually tighten demands and micromanage our lives. As if on cue, they are now moving from suggesting to demanding that everyone, no matter what their risk level, health or opinion be forced to wear masks in public....

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

It is time to resist the edicts and mandates of blue city mayors and blue state governors.  We must remind them that they are out public servants and that we are not their subjects.  They have gone too far with their elitist god complexes and control freak zealotry.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The Left has sprinted past what we previously thought was a line in the sand between personal freedom and forced dictates of personal behavior by the state.





The breach of that boundary has led to numerous other fundamental rights crumbling to dust along with our historical monuments.

There is still time to restore those boundaries and our rights but only if we start telling the truth en masse and defying unjust edicts from lawless lawmakers. We can’t simply hope that there will be enough lawful lawmakers to speak up. We must speak up.

Coronavirus is still being used as an excuse to crack down on our freedoms despite false projections that even the CDC dramatically ratcheted down months ago.

Democrat governors and other politicians are refusing to relinquish the “emergency powers” they awarded themselves to allow them to continue to impose lock downs and restrict businesses at their own whim.

As if they somehow thought of it themselves, they act simultaneously to continually tighten demands and micromanage our lives.  As if on cue, they are now moving from suggesting to demanding that everyone, no matter what their risk level, health or opinion be forced to wear masks in public. What a perfect and ever-present reminder that we are not in charge of our lives. They are.

Even weak-kneed Republicans like Governor Greg Abbott of Texas have become lost in this masquerade.

It doesn’t matter whether masks work or make sense. It only matters that it has been a wildly successful tool for obedience training in collectivism for Americans. Socialism can’t take hold without it.

The avowed and secret socialists among us are engaged in an all-out battle to punish America for being built precisely on that individualism and for flourishing because of a constitution that was created to protect it.

While Democrat tacticians have their Democrat politicians ramping up threats of fines and jail time for refusing to wear a mask, they’re also pushing the idea that masks are “cool.”  There is a whole new cottage industry that is marketing masks as an opportunity to make a “signature” fashion statement. There’s nothing quite like superficial individuality to “mask” one’s prostration to serfdom and conformity.

Savvy watchers of the Left were suspicious early on when they noticed a familiar Leftist tactic being warmed up and served for public consumption. 
They went to work making it socially acceptable to vilify dissenters and brand them as selfish. They rewarded it. How dare anyone question the efficacy of masks or the use of bullying and intimidation to force Americans to comply?  How dare anyone care about their own personal freedom and the freedom of their fellow citizens, even those too ignorant or complacent to care?  We’re in the middle of a pandemic!

Masks create further alienation and suspicion between friends, neighbors and business associates. They muzzle us while helping to easily identify dissenters.

We have seen how deadly the combination of collectivism and social bullying can be. It can often lead to mob rule and violence. At that point, politicians don’t have to worry about enforcing their unconstitutional orders. The mob does it for them.

Masks also blur the lines between criminals and law-abiding citizens. We are indistinguishable from Antifa and other groups who now commit heinous crimes in plain sight and with impunity. The backward subliminal message is that masked people are law-abiding and unmasked people are criminals.

After watching the same Democrat politicians refuse to impose their own orders on rioters, looters and vandals, their credibility is lower than the fatality rate of the coronavirus.

In light of such a blatant dereliction of duty to protect their innocent constituents, they still have the chutzpah to claim that it is compassion that compels them to order us to wear masks.

The good news is that a growing number of people believe that these suffocating orders are ridiculous and even dangerous. The bad news is that most still only whisper it in muffled tones behind their cloth masks.

As we have seen, complying with the orders of authoritarians only brings more authoritarianism. Masks will continue to be a major battleground on which we can beat it back.


Previously polite, law-abiding citizens must unmask themselves and let their voices be heard. Unlike their oppressive opposition, they have little interest in vilifying those who choose to wear a mask for their own reasons.


In the 1982 film, Ben Kingsley portrayed Gandhi as saying, “100,000 Englishmen simply cannot control 350 million Indians, if those Indians refuse to cooperate.”

It’s time to stop cooperating.






Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

Masks also blur the lines between criminals and law-abiding citizens. We are indistinguishable from Antifa and other groups who now commit heinous crimes in plain sight and with impunity. The backward subliminal message is that masked people are law-abiding and unmasked people are criminals.

After watching the same Democrat politicians refuse to impose their own orders on rioters, looters and vandals, their credibility is lower than the fatality rate of the coronavirus.

In light of such a blatant dereliction of duty to protect their innocent constituents, they still have the chutzpah to claim that it is compassion that compels them to order us to wear masks.

The good news is that a growing number of people believe that these suffocating orders are ridiculous and even dangerous. The bad news is that most still only whisper it in muffled tones behind their cloth masks.

As we have seen, complying with the orders of authoritarians only brings more authoritarianism. Masks will continue to be a major battleground on which we can beat it back.

Previously polite, law-abiding citizens must unmask themselves and let their voices be heard. Unlike their oppressive opposition, they have little interest in vilifying those who choose to wear a mask for their own reasons. https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/9091/masking-the-truth-its-not-about-the-virus-its-about-obedience

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
2  lady in black    4 years ago

More bullshit

 
 
 
MonsterMash
Sophomore Quiet
2.1  MonsterMash  replied to  lady in black @2    4 years ago
More bullshit

If so, post the facts

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @2    4 years ago

It just shows that we won’t be controlled.  Even if Biden won the presidency and democrats gain the senate, we won’t be.  The tea party and reopen movements will become one and the resistance would begin.  

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
2.2.1  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @2.2.1    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
2.2.3  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.2    4 years ago

Nope, it's they whining snowflake children posing as adults that are throwing temper tantrums in public that they have to wear a mask. See Costco Ken...recently fired because of this

 
 
 
MonsterMash
Sophomore Quiet
2.2.5  MonsterMash  replied to  lady in black @2.2.1    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MonsterMash @2.2.5    4 years ago

The resistance to the BLM and cancel culture lunacy will re elect President Trump on a law and order and preserve our history platform.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @2.2.3    4 years ago

What are you responding to? What’s your point?  There’s nothing there in 2.2.2 that you claim to be replying to.  

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3  lady in black    4 years ago

99399240_10214040950817687_9011921614232616960_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=110474&_nc_oc=AQlb-FAoUr9mAXvvKTcCKy05kHnee6b1UnlV-bybE38k_3vN8rKqj3GMVR_mFFV5DTI&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-1.xx&oh=9f1e9a12c7e208c53eade3de1cdb7476&oe=5F2B555F

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @3    4 years ago

We aren’t going to scream at those who voluntarily make the choice to wear a mask.  If you’d bothered to read the article you commented about you would have seen this:

“As we have seen, complying with the orders of authoritarians only brings more authoritarianism. Masks will continue to be a major battleground on which we can beat it back.

Previously polite, law-abiding citizens must unmask themselves and let their voices be heard. Unlike their oppressive opposition, they have little interest in vilifying those who choose to wear a mask for their own reasons.


In the 1982 film, Ben Kingsley portrayed Gandhi as saying, “100,000 Englishmen simply cannot control 350 million Indians, if those Indians refuse to cooperate.”

It’s time to stop cooperating.“  https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/9091/masking-the-truth-its-not-about-the-virus-its-about-obedience?g=5#cm1352759

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.1.1  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1    4 years ago

More excuses, that's all this is.  Wear the mask so EVERYONE is safe, use some common sense.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to    4 years ago

As Jerry Williams once said - "Let's not bring any dead veterans into this."  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @3.1.1    4 years ago

No.  I will not.  I will wear a mask when at work or indoors in a crowd but never at home, never in my car, never outdoors, and never indoors when I can wash hands and social distance.  In this state I make it a point not to wear one whenever where ever I can because our governor said we must.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @3.1.1    4 years ago

You making the demand is the best reason I can think of to not do it.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @3.1.1    4 years ago

Make me!  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.3  JohnRussell  replied to  lady in black @3    4 years ago

We are seeing the true colors of a lot of people this year. They are claiming serious violation of their civil rights because they are required to wear a thin cloth mask inside a store or office.  It is ridiculous. 

This is what violation of civil rights looks like

bh_birmingham_protests.jpg

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.3.1  lady in black  replied to  JohnRussell @3.3    4 years ago

I'd hate to see what people who don't want to wear masks would have been like during WWII, so sad that this is to benefit all people living here, yet some are too ignorant to see that.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.3.2  JohnRussell  replied to  lady in black @3.3.1    4 years ago
I'd hate to see what people who don't want to wear masks would have been like during WWII

" I have a right as an American  to buy as much steak as I want. If you want the soldiers in the combat zones to have meat too, grow more cows." "

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  lady in black @3    4 years ago

That's really divisive and it also creates a false narrative. I didn't see many masks worn by those vicious demonstrators.

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.4.1  lady in black  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.4    4 years ago

Did I ever once post anywhere on this site that I agreed with the demonstrations, NO I did not.

Did I ever once post anywhere on this site that I excused any demonstrator for not wearing a mask, NO I did not.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.4.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  lady in black @3.4.1    4 years ago

That poster implies something. If anyone doubts that, all one has to do is look at the leanings of those who voted it up. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.4.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  lady in black @3.4.1    4 years ago

but so many on that side did and do...

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.4.4  lady in black  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.4.2    4 years ago

The poster implies, wear a mask and if not, you won't get served at a business.  

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.4.5  lady in black  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.4.3    4 years ago

What side are you talking about....I posted about me and that you will not find one post from me that condoned the demonstrations and condoned the demonstrators not wearing masks, I don't speak for anyone but myself

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.4.6  JohnRussell  replied to  lady in black @3.4.5    4 years ago

There is nothing divisive about the poster LIB. 

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
3.4.7  lady in black  replied to  JohnRussell @3.4.6    4 years ago

I know there isn't..it's plain common sense.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.4.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.4.6    4 years ago

Lol...You just did two little articles portraying those who don't wear masks as partisan. 

Personally, when I go to the supermarket - during senior hours (6AM -7AM), I don't see any shoppers not wearing a mask. I don't think the problem lies with people shopping. It usually involves the more serious matter of large groups not distancing themselves.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.4.9  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.4.8    4 years ago

I too wear one when in a long line at the Walmart checkout or any other such place crowded where social distancing isn’t possible .  If I go into a store with few or no other customers I use the sanitizer and social distance without a face covering.  I wear it only where I want to protect others or myself.  If a store makes me put one on that isn’t crowded and there’s a like store nearby, I leave for the other store.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    4 years ago
As we have seen, complying with the orders of authoritarians only brings more authoritarianism. Masks will continue to be a major battleground on which we can beat it back.

This is so ridiculous.

When in public, engage in social distancing and wear a mask to mitigate infecting others in close proximity.   Keep your hands clean and avoid touching your face.   If you feel sick, stay home.

Once we have a vaccine and infection is mitigated by effective herd immunity we will be able to slowly return to something closer to normal.   Until then, it is foolish to follow partisan attempts to work people into a frenzy.   Get past the partisan agendas and think critically.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @4    4 years ago

I follow all precautions except face coverings and I do social distance , following the marlins on the floor, etc.  If social distancing is impossible indoors, then I pull out my reusable cloth mask and use it long enough to get out of the situation.  For the most part the mask fad is strictly a matter of control and expected obedience and nothing more

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1    4 years ago
For the most part the mask fad is strictly a matter of control and expected obedience and nothing more

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif   Masks inhibit an infected person spreading the infection via breathing and talking.   They are not part of some worldwide conspiracy to gratuitously control people. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    4 years ago

I have problems with some of the emergency policies, but honestly making people wear masks is not one of them. It's pretty simple. It's not very disruptive of our lives. The things are cheap. And the government doesn't get anything out of it. It's a small thing that inhibits spread of the disease and might save a lot of lives. I can see complaining about some things, but come on. Masks?

Other stuff makes less sense. Science tells us being outside is better than being inside, so government closes the beaches. If you just restrict people to family groups, the beach seems pretty safe to me. Lower risk, at any rate. But marching down Main Street in groups of hundreds is A-OK.

Also, they opened up bars before they opened up churches. What's the difference?

A buddy of mine who runs a car shop gets harassed constantly by government officials who test him and his guys frequently and get on them about disinfecting surfaces (which the CDC says is lower risk for transmission) and wants to charge him thousands of dollars for special equipment and chemicals to clean his place. That is the kind of thing that seems like a scam to make the government money and pay government employees. Think about it: it's a car shop. Customers are already not allowed in there and he's got his desk blocked off by plastic. 

Masks seem like small potatoes by comparison.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tacos! @5    4 years ago

It was the accumulation of petty tyrant god complex control freaking by blue mayors and governors that ended all trust in anything they say and a general desire to defy everything they do by decree.  I didn’t mind wearing them in certain circumstances when they were suggested or optional.  Making them mandatory crossed the line.  I still wear one indoors working or shopping where social distancing is difficult or impossible.  Anywhere else I make a point of not doing so because resistance is important.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1    4 years ago

And besides, we have to remind our leftist opposition that even if they gain the Presidency and senate that they will find us every bit as difficult to govern as they have been for the current president.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1    4 years ago

https://www.instagram.com/p/CCdkf6jHQCu/?igshid=8lpvs39tuqst

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDWdjWvHOV3/?igshid=18qzpjmdfbv7c

 
 

Who is online



90 visitors