Feel free to display your pride in the state of Md . Not much to write home about but you can mention being sensible [according to you] . What do they export : crabs and Baltimore drugs
Well, all I can say is Thank God you saved us all from a Nipple. Never mind it was a political statement, and not porn. Good Job. Meanwhile. XXJefferson's RB articles are getting steamrrolled by the trolls with absolutly no Moderator action. In fact, Moderators have taken to trolling them as well.
But the Nipple is gone. So all is right with the world.
XX told me that commenting on the exact words of one of his articles was off topic because the topic was a celebration of God. The christian God no doubt. XX is hardly the judge of what constitutes an off topic comment.
Well, Bruce, you see the advertisers who keep this site afloat, tell me what can and can't be on the site, and nudity is one of those small things... they don't care if it makes a political statement, although a piggy on a nipple seems to elude me as political..
As for XX Jeff... may I remind you, if we are contacted, we come. He doesn't contact us ever.
And no moderator has steamrolled him. The same thing that was told to him, was just told to John last night.. but hey why would you care? I mean John is a liberal, so if anything you enjoyed that one.
And as for John, he's actually correct. He gave a warning. That's what the CoC says. After that, he can demand that the individual leave his article. Which is what he did.
No you miss the point. I just skim the article to make sure that there is nothing wrong with the images, since that is where things go wrong the most often and I can run into problems... so it didn't matter what was the message, it was the nipple that mattered to the advertisers. Target doesn't care what point you are trying to make. They want to make sure that it is up to their standards. I only comply.
And for the record, by the time anyone noticed a pig on a nipple, damage done.
Yeah, well how about next time LETTING ME KNOW YOU DID IT! How about a fucking message, or a purple fucking note in its place? Is that too much to ask when you're going to censor an article?
Yeah, well how about next time LETTING ME KNOW YOU DID IT! How about a fucking message, or a purple fucking note in its place? Is that too much to ask when you're going to censor an article?
Actually there you are correct. But since I know you know the CoC and TOS inside and outside, I assumed you did that on purpose. If you didn't, I apologize. Now stop cursing at me!
#3: Author/seeder (with assistance from administration) moderates his/her own article. Authors/seeders are expected to foster healthy, open discussions. They are responsible for the content they submit and must exercise impartiality if/when reporting abuse.
You don't get to report a CoC violation if you are not being a good host. He was not.
In this case, yes Bruce. Once the author has set up a dynamic of a hostile article, any comments have a strong probability of being hostile in return. You get what you receive.
Hilariousness ensues !
That argument flips both ways John.
Oregon Oct 2015.
Seven years in and the nutjobs are still plugging away.
Seven years in and the economy still sucks . The middle class loves you Obama even if you failed econ 101 !
Maryland , named after the mother of Jesus ... how does that hit ya atheists ?!
Maryland was named after Mary, Queen of Scots, Mother of James who united the British and Scottish royal family in his person. How do facts grab you?
And by the way, Virginia wasn't named after her either.
So ... you're saying that your memes WERE based on fact ?
Here's another
Maryland : close enough to DC for the stink to rub off
"Maryland : close enough to DC for the stink to rub off"
... and still one million times more sensible than Florida.
Feel free to display your pride in the state of Md . Not much to write home about but you can mention being sensible [according to you] . What do they export : crabs and Baltimore drugs
Well, if you take Baltimore away from Maryland really all you have left is the eastern side of West Virginia.
I see one of the Mods chose to delete one of the memes. Fuck you.
It was me Bruce and your nipple picture is against the TOS and I am too much of a lady to retort in kind.
Much Holiday Happiness,
Perrie~
Well, all I can say is Thank God you saved us all from a Nipple. Never mind it was a political statement, and not porn. Good Job. Meanwhile. XXJefferson's RB articles are getting steamrrolled by the trolls with absolutly no Moderator action. In fact, Moderators have taken to trolling them as well.
But the Nipple is gone. So all is right with the world.
XX told me that commenting on the exact words of one of his articles was off topic because the topic was a celebration of God. The christian God no doubt. XX is hardly the judge of what constitutes an off topic comment.
ToS is what it is . Live with it Bruce .
Well, Bruce, you see the advertisers who keep this site afloat, tell me what can and can't be on the site, and nudity is one of those small things... they don't care if it makes a political statement, although a piggy on a nipple seems to elude me as political..
As for XX Jeff... may I remind you, if we are contacted, we come. He doesn't contact us ever.
And no moderator has steamrolled him. The same thing that was told to him, was just told to John last night.. but hey why would you care? I mean John is a liberal, so if anything you enjoyed that one.
A pig, tattooed on a nipple, to prevent rape from Muslim men. If you don't see the political statement in that, then you're part of the problem.
And as for John, he's actually correct. He gave a warning. That's what the CoC says. After that, he can demand that the individual leave his article. Which is what he did.
Bruce,
No you miss the point. I just skim the article to make sure that there is nothing wrong with the images, since that is where things go wrong the most often and I can run into problems... so it didn't matter what was the message, it was the nipple that mattered to the advertisers. Target doesn't care what point you are trying to make. They want to make sure that it is up to their standards. I only comply.
And for the record, by the time anyone noticed a pig on a nipple, damage done.
Yeah, well how about next time LETTING ME KNOW YOU DID IT! How about a fucking message, or a purple fucking note in its place? Is that too much to ask when you're going to censor an article?
Yeah, well how about next time LETTING ME KNOW YOU DID IT! How about a fucking message, or a purple fucking note in its place? Is that too much to ask when you're going to censor an article?
Actually there you are correct. But since I know you know the CoC and TOS inside and outside, I assumed you did that on purpose. If you didn't, I apologize. Now stop cursing at me!
No, John was wrong. You can't break the CoC while asking for it to be enforced. Do you not get the how ridiculous that is?
Two seperate issues. The fact that he broke the CoC with a personal attack does not negate the issue of keeping the comments on topic.
You are slipping Bruce... because:
#3: Author/seeder (with assistance from administration) moderates his/her own article. Authors/seeders are expected to foster healthy, open discussions. They are responsible for the content they submit and must exercise impartiality if/when reporting abuse.
You don't get to report a CoC violation if you are not being a good host. He was not.
So two wrongs cancel each other out eh?
I think I see her point . If you want the help of mods you need to not violate the CoC yourself . OTW it becomes unclear who to delete ...
Exactly Petey... also a ton more work to do which is all unnecessary.
In this case, yes Bruce. Once the author has set up a dynamic of a hostile article, any comments have a strong probability of being hostile in return. You get what you receive.