╌>

Caitlyn Jenner Appears To Have Ruined The Name For Everybody Else

  

Category:  Now Trending

Via:  johnrussell  •  7 years ago  •  9 comments

Caitlyn Jenner Appears To Have Ruined The Name For Everybody Else

Caitlyn Jenner attends the Moschino Spring/Summer 17 Menswear and Women's Resort Collection during MADE LA at L.A. Live Event Deck on June 10, 2016 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Kevin Winter/Getty Images)


'Caitlyn' Dropped in Popularity More Than Any Other Baby Name in 2016


Don't call me Caitlyn.

A year after Caitlyn Jenner announced her new name and gender, the popularity of the name Caitlyn plummeted more than any other baby name, according to Social Security's annual list of the most popular baby names.

In fact, the four names that dropped the most were all variations of the same name: Caitlin, Caitlyn, Katelynn and Kaitlynn.

"It was inevitable," said Laura Wattenberg, founder of BabynameWizard . com . "Caitlyn was already falling in popularity. Now it is suddenly controversial."

Each year, the Social Security Administration releases the top 1,000 baby names and uses the announcement to drive traffic to their website, where workers can start tracking their benefits long before they retire.

Emma was the top baby name for girls for the third year in a row. It was followed by Olivia, Ava, Sophia and Isabella, the Social Security Administration announced Friday.

Noah was the top baby name for boys for the fourth year in a row. It was followed by Liam, William, Mason and James.

The agency also lists the baby names that increase - and decrease - the most in popularity.

All four versions of Caitlyn fell out of the top 1,000.

In 2015, the former Bruce Jenner, an Olympic gold medalist, shocked the world when she announced that she is now a transgender woman. The iconic cover of Vanity Fair magazine was emblazoned with the quote, "Call me Caitlyn," on top of a picture of a very feminine Jenner.

The issue sparked much debate and an outpouring of support for Jenner in a country that is still evolving in its views of gay marriage and equal rights for the LGBT community.

Wattenberg said it would be wrong to blame Caitlyn's drop in popularity solely to a wave of homophobia. In general, she said, parents don't want to give their children names that might attract controversy.

It's one reason few parents name their children after politicians.

"Even parents who are huge Donald Trump supporters are unlikely to name their child Donald," Wattenberg said. "In part, we just want to avoid controversy in picking names."

The Social Security Administration's website provides lists of the top 1,000 baby names for each year, dating to 1880. The top baby names that year were John and Mary. John is now No. 28 and Mary has fallen to No. 127.

Sometimes old is new: Emma was the third most popular name in 1880.

The top 10 baby names for girls stayed the same in 2016, though the order shuffled a bit. For boys, Alexander dropped to No. 11 and Elijah cracked the top 10 for the first time ever, at No. 9.

Baby naming experts said parents have long used biblical names for their children. However, there has been a decided shift from the New Testament to the Old.

"Elijah to our grandparents would be unimaginable," Wattenberg said.

Also, parents are getting more creative in naming the little ones. As a result, today's top names aren't nearly as popular as the top names from 50 years ago.

For example, a little more than 19,000 baby boys were named Noah last year. In 1966, about 80,000 babies were named Michael, the top name for baby boys that year.

"Once parents see that a name is super popular, they are going to start avoiding it," said Jennifer Moss, founder of  Babynames . com .

http://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/whats-hot/caitlyn-dropped-in-popularity-more-than-any-other-baby-name-in-2016/ar-BBB3N0R?OCID=ansmsnnews11


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   seeder  JohnRussell    7 years ago

The name was fading already and "Caitlyn" Jenner shoved it out the door.  

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
link   1ofmany  replied to  JohnRussell   7 years ago

The name was fading already and "Caitlyn" Jenner shoved it out the door.  

Why would anybody want their baby to share the same name as that ball of confusion? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  1ofmany   7 years ago

Evidently they don't.  I think the article probably has it right. The name Caitlyn was already a little passe , and having it publicized by Caitlyn Jenner just sped the process along. Maybe she chose the name knowing it was on the way out. 

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
link   1ofmany  replied to  JohnRussell   7 years ago

Any name he chose would be on its way out just be he chose it. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
link   seeder  JohnRussell    7 years ago

The names Huckabee and Spicer are mud now too, not to mention Kellianne. 

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
link   1ofmany  replied to  JohnRussell   7 years ago

Nobody was ever going to name their baby Huckabee or Spicer so the popularity of the names was unaffected. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
link   Hal A. Lujah    7 years ago

There are an estimated 1.4 million transgender US citizens.  Some of them have to have been named Caitlyn at birth.  I want to know how many Caitlyns have changed their named to Bruce.

 
 
 
1ofmany
Sophomore Silent
link   1ofmany  replied to  Hal A. Lujah   7 years ago

I want to know how many trans-species balls of confusion had whiskers surgically attached to their faces, started eating meow mix, and insisted on being called Garfield.  

 
 

Who is online

Igknorantzruls


432 visitors