╌>

This Day In History: 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis

  

Category:  History & Sociology

Via:  vic-eldred  •  7 years ago  •  5 comments

This Day In History: 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis

EXCOMM_meeting_Cuban_Missile_Crisis_29_O


In a televised speech of extraordinary gravity, President   John F. Kennedy announces that U.S. spy planes have discovered Soviet missile bases in Cuba. These missile sites—under construction but nearing completion—housed medium-range missiles capable of striking a number of major cities in the United States, including   Washington , D.C. Kennedy announced that he was ordering a naval “quarantine” of Cuba to prevent Soviet ships from transporting any more offensive weapons to the island and explained that the United States would not tolerate the existence of the missile sites currently in place. The president made it clear that America would not stop short of military action to end what he called a “clandestine, reckless, and provocative threat to world peace.”

What is known as the Cuban Missile Crisis actually began on October 15, 1962—the day that U.S. intelligence personnel analyzing U-2 spy plane data discovered that the Soviets were building medium-range missile sites in Cuba. The next day, President Kennedy secretly convened an emergency meeting of his senior military, political, and diplomatic advisers to discuss the ominous development. The group became known as ExCom, short for Executive Committee. After rejecting a surgical air strike against the missile sites, ExCom decided on a naval quarantine and a demand that the bases be dismantled and missiles removed. On the night of October 22, Kennedy went on national television to announce his decision. During the next six days, the crisis escalated to a breaking point as the world tottered on the brink of nuclear war between the two superpowers.

On October 23, the quarantine of Cuba began, but Kennedy decided to give Soviet leader   Nikita Khrushchev   more time to consider the U.S. action by pulling the quarantine line back 500 miles. By October 24, Soviet ships en route to Cuba capable of carrying military cargoes appeared to have slowed down, altered, or reversed their course as they approached the quarantine, with the exception of one ship—the tanker   Bucharest . At the request of more than 40 nonaligned nations, U.N. Secretary-General U Thant sent private appeals to Kennedy and Khrushchev, urging that their governments “refrain from any action that may aggravate the situation and bring with it the risk of war.” At the direction of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, U.S. military forces went to DEFCON 2, the highest military alert ever reached in the postwar era, as military commanders prepared for full-scale war with the Soviet Union.

On October 25, the aircraft carrier USS   Essex   and the destroyer USS   Gearing attempted to intercept the Soviet tanker   Bucharest   as it crossed over the U.S. quarantine of Cuba. The Soviet ship failed to cooperate, but the U.S. Navy restrained itself from forcibly seizing the ship, deeming it unlikely that the tanker was carrying offensive weapons. On October 26, Kennedy learned that work on the missile bases was proceeding without interruption, and ExCom considered authorizing a U.S. invasion of Cuba. The same day, the Soviets transmitted a proposal for ending the crisis: The missile bases would be removed in exchange for a U.S. pledge not to invade Cuba.

The next day, however, Khrushchev upped the ante by publicly calling for the dismantling of U.S. missile bases in Turkey under pressure from Soviet military commanders. While Kennedy and his crisis advisers debated this dangerous turn in negotiations, a U-2 spy plane was shot down over Cuba, and its pilot, Major Rudolf Anderson, was killed. To the dismay of the   Pentagon , Kennedy forbid a military retaliation unless any more surveillance planes were fired upon over Cuba. To defuse the worsening crisis, Kennedy and his advisers agreed to dismantle the U.S. missile sites in Turkey but at a later date, in order to prevent the protest of Turkey, a key NATO member.

On October 28, Khrushchev announced his government’s intent to dismantle and remove all offensive Soviet weapons in Cuba. With the airing of the public message on Radio Moscow, the USSR confirmed its willingness to proceed with the solution secretly proposed by the Americans the day before. In the afternoon, Soviet technicians began dismantling the missile sites, and the world stepped back from the brink of nuclear war. The Cuban Missile Crisis was effectively over. In November, Kennedy called off the blockade, and by the end of the year all the offensive missiles had left Cuba. Soon after, the United States quietly removed its missiles from Turkey.

The Cuban Missile Crisis seemed at the time a clear victory for the United States, but Cuba emerged from the episode with a much greater sense of security.The removal of antiquated   Jupiter   missiles from Turkey had no detrimental effect on U.S. nuclear strategy, but the Cuban Missile Crisis convinced a humiliated USSR to commence a massive nuclear buildup. In the 1970s, the Soviet Union reached nuclear parity with the United States and built intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of striking any city in the United States.

A succession of U.S. administrations honored Kennedy’s pledge not to invade Cuba, and relations with the communist island nation situated just 80 miles from   Florida   remained a thorn in the side of U.S. foreign policy for more than 50 years. In 2015, officials from both nations announced the formal normalization of relations between the U.S and Cuba, which included the easing of travel restrictions and the opening of embassies and diplomatic missions in both countries.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/cuban-missile-crisis


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    7 years ago

"A succession of U.S. administrations honored Kennedy’s pledge not to invade Cuba, and relations with the communist island nation situated just 80 miles from  Florida  remained a thorn in the side of U.S. foreign policy for more than 50 years."

It is that deal which led a generation of Cuban refugees/Cuban Americans to trend toward the GOP. It was that deal along with JFK being upstaged at the "Bay of Pigs" & the Berlin crisis, which led the young President to try and make a red line stand in a place called Vietnam.

 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
1.2  Nowhere Man  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    7 years ago
.....which led the young President to try and make a red line stand in a place called Vietnam.

Although I agree with your other points my friend, this is actually incorrect. Jack had rejected sending combat troops to Vietnam and refused to expand the war or pay anymore money to France in financing the war.

Many people feel this is why he was assassinated, although there is no proof of such....

But then afterwards, LBJ with a lie did what the MIC wanted, full military commitment....

And we know who paid the price for that...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nowhere Man @1.2    7 years ago

You seem to be talking about the what ifs - I'm talking about what led to us going there. John Kennedy was thought to be young & inexperienced by Nikita  Khrushchev and thus was tested all over the world. In 1961, Kennedy gave a very revealing interview to the legendary New York Times reporter, James Reston:

"Kennedy, of course, was the first president to send soldiers to Southeast Asia, 16,732 of them, supposedly as mere “advisers,” but many of them actually combatants. As Kennedy had famously told  The New York Times ’s James Reston late in 1961 after the failure at the Bay of Pigs and the erection of the Berlin Wall, “Now we have a problem in making our power credible, and Vietnam is the place.” And a damned good place, his military men kept telling him: early in his third year as president, his Vietnam commanders reported that “barring greatly increased resupply and reinforcement of the Viet Cong by the infiltration, the military phase of the war can be virtually won in 1963”—an opinion he continued hearing repeatedly. That’s important context, for whether JFK’s plans on what to do in Vietnam were contingent on  military success  in Vietnam—as opposed to cutting and running even if that meant leaving the country to the Communist insurgency—is key to this debate."


 
 
 
Nowhere Man
Junior Participates
1.2.2  Nowhere Man  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.1    7 years ago

This is the thing.

Everyone has an opinion. The fact that Kennedy decided against sending combat troops to Vietnam is not a what if, it is an actual fact. We can argue his intentions all we want, but the FACT remains that Kennedy was seeking a way out in '62/'63, not a way in... (three weeks later he was dead)

Yes the military was screaming at him that "WE go in now, full commitment, we will have finished them by the end of '63, early '64 at the latest"......

The plain facts of history tell us different.....

 
 

Who is online



JohnRussell
Igknorantzruls
Kavika


172 visitors