U.S. top court rejects challenge to strict Arkansas abortion law
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
From MSN News:
In a setback to abortion rights advocates, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday paved the way for Republican-backed restrictions on medication-induced abortions to take effect in Arkansas that could lead to the shuttering of two of the state's three abortion clinics. The nine justices, with no noted dissents, declined to hear an appeal by abortion provider Planned Parenthood of a lower court ruling that had revived the state law, which sets regulations regarding the RU-486 "abortion pill," after it was earlier struck down by a federal judge. The law had remained blocked pending the outcome of the appeal to the Supreme Court.
The high court's action will not be the final word on the matter. Planned Parenthood, which argues that the law would ban medication abortion in Arkansas, said it will immediately ask a federal judge to reimpose the injunction blocking the law.
Planned Parenthood also said it is telling patients they can no longer access medication abortion at its two clinics in the state. The only other abortion clinic in Arkansas, Little Rock Family Planning Services in the state capital, offers both surgical and medication abortions.
"This law cannot and must not stand. We will not stop fighting for every person's right to access safe, legal abortion," said Dawn Laguens, Planned Parenthood's executive vice president.
A spokeswoman for Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge had no immediate comment. The Supreme Court in 1973 legalized abortion nationwide, but many Republican-governed states have passed laws seeking to impose a variety of restrictions, some so demanding that they may shut down abortion clinics and make the procedure far more difficult to obtain.
TEXAS RULING:
The justices, in a 2016 ruling, struck down a restrictive Republican-backed Texas law that had targeted abortion clinics and doctors in a decision that was seen as reaffirming and fortifying legal protections for abortion rights. Planned Parenthood had claimed the appeals court ruling in the Arkansas case had disregarded the precedent set in the Texas case. The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals restored the law last year, reversing a 2016 ruling by a district court judge that had prevented it from going into effect. Planned Parenthood Great Plains sued the state in 2015, saying the law would deprive many Arkansas women of their legal right to an abortion. The law involves the RU-486 "abortion pill," also called mifepristone (brand name Mifeprex) and misoprostol (brand name Cytotec). It requires any doctor dispensing the drug to sign a contract with another doctor who would agree to handle any medical complications from it, an unusual and difficult-to-achieve arrangement. The contracted doctor also must have admitting privileges at a hospital designated to handle emergencies.
Arkansas said the law was aimed at protecting women against the "dangerous and potentially dangerous" off-label use of the abortion pills.
RU-486 was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2000 subject to the instructions stated on the label. The "off-label" use prohibited by Arkansas allowed for less physician oversight when RU-486 is used. Planned Parenthood, which offers only medication-induced abortions at its two facilities in Arkansas, said the effect of the law would be to ban such abortions in the state.
The district court judge had found that women in Fayetteville, for example, would then have to make two 380-mile (610-km) round trips to get an abortion at what would be the state's last remaining abortion clinic.
Even as U.S. states seek to impose new limits on abortion, restrictions in some other countries are loosening. Ireland voted overwhelmingly last week to repeal a constitutional amendment that banned abortion.
In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court left intact an Oklahoma court ruling that struck down a state law that would have effectively banned RU-486. In the Supreme Court's current term, which runs through the end of June, the justices are weighing another abortion-related case in which operators of Christian-affiliated "crisis pregnancy centers" that steer women with unplanned pregnancies away from abortion are challenging a California law that requires them to post notices telling women about the availability of state-subsidized abortions.
Tags
Who is online
89 visitors
These backwards states certainly do not quit trying to limit or prohibit a woman's right to an abortion. It's also narrow-minded thinking on their part. Medication-induced abortions (from RU-486 use) is much safer, easier, and cheaper than invasive abortion procedures. So banning the use of abortion medications will only cause women to have more invasive procedures or utilize other potentially unsafe medications. Either way, it places an unnecessary burden and restriction on women regarding their choice for abortion.
This is total BS! RU-486 was approved by the FDA and is safe if used as indicated. Is Arkansas going to impose laws against other medications, say Tylenol or Nyquil, because people might use them for "off-label" use?
Who would have thought Ireland of all places is becoming more enlightened and progressive than some states in regards to women's rights?
How about the abuse of prescription drugs? It is appalling that they think women need "protecting" from themselves and making decisions for themselves.
Which I imagine is more common that "off-label" use of abortifacients.
That shows their mentality. It's both appalling and insulting.
Perhaps people in bassackward states need to start getting involved and vote less douchbags into office.
That might help. Although, it seems douchbags are the only candidates running.
Given that there weren't even 4 votes to grant cert this sounds like a procedural issue and not any sort of sympathy with the Arkansas law.