╌>

Deepwater Horizon led to new protections for US waters. Trump just repealed them.

  

Category:  Environment/Climate

Via:  bob-nelson  •  6 years ago  •  27 comments

Deepwater Horizon led to new protections for US waters. Trump just repealed them.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig exploded on April 20, 2010, killing 11 workers. Gas erupted into a massive fireball, and then the rig gushed 4.9 million barrels of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico. It soon became the largest and most expensive marine oil spill in history, with an estimated $17.2 billion in damages to properties, fisheries, and tourism across the Gulf Coast.

GettyImages_98736482.0.jpg President Trump signed an executive order this week undoing an executive order signed by Barack Obama
that imposed regulations on offshore drilling after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

US Coast Guard

In response, President Barack Obama signed an executive order creating a commission to study the spill. The commission recommended new safety rules, accountability standards, and environmental regulations for drilling in US waters. Obama then signed another executive order to promote environmental stewardship of the ocean, coasts, and the Great Lakes in light of the oil spill. According to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management , the new rules were “the most aggressive and comprehensive reforms to offshore oil and gas regulation and oversight in U.S. history.”

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump revoked Obama’s stewardship directive , replacing it with a new executive order giving more responsibility to states for offshore oil and gas drilling, as well as prioritizing business interests ahead of the environment. Trump said the measure is “ rolling back excessive bureaucracy created by the previous administration .” (There was no mention of the Deepwater Horizon spill in his announcement or in the executive order.)

Rep. Rob Bishop (R-UT), who chairs the House Natural Resources Committee, said the order “puts our country’s ocean policy back on the right track.”

A former member of the Coast Guard who served during Deepwater Horizon was appalled:

Screenshot_33.png

House Natural Resources Committee ranking member Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) told the Associated Press the order was “unilaterally throwing out” years of environmental preservation efforts.

Perhaps most importantly, the order unravels coastal protection rules put in place to avoid future disasters like the Deepwater Horizon spill. The provisions limited where and how energy companies could drill, and the industry has been chafing at the regulations.

The new executive order is the oil industry’s wish come true


The Deepwater Horizon disaster showed that there were systemic failures in the offshore oil industry that came to a head on that day eight years ago. Oil major BP, which was leasing the rig, was pushing operators to work faster and had racked up hundreds of safety violations at the time of the explosion. The operator, Transocean , also made mistakes in reporting alerts and in interpreting critical data, highlighting poor training. And government regulators quickly approved last-minute changes to the well’s design shortly before it exploded.

The disaster also illustrated how ill-prepared coastal communities were for such a spill, and how vulnerable their economies were to such a traumatic event.

The Obama administration added new requirements and rules to reduce the risk of these factors aligning again. They strengthened the drilling permit review process, added stricter safety requirements, and forced companies to conduct better environmental reviews.

But in April 2017, Trump issued an executive order directing Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to “ reconsider ” rules implemented after the Deepwater Horizon spill. This week’s executive order is the culmination of that effort.

Industry groups were elated at the prospect of undoing the changes. Environmental groups were aghast.

Screenshot_34.png

It’s unlikely that the new executive order will lead to more drilling right away, given that the United States already has abundant onshore oil and drilling in the water can be up to 20 times more expensive. But oil prices are rising , and lower safety requirements and weaker environmental protections would lower operating costs for coastal rigs. Activists are worried looser regulations would lead to more drilling and less safe operations, increasing the likelihood of another disaster.

The Interior Department is also presiding over the largest rollback of federal land protections in US history, opening up public lands to fossil fuel extraction and mineral mining. Plus, Secretary Zinke opened up nearly all coastal waters to drilling last year and started the process for the largest offshore lease sale ever.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    6 years ago

MAGA!

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
2  bbl-1    6 years ago
MAGA! "I love the uneducated!" DJT. Hate sells but not as good as ignorance.
 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4  Hal A. Lujah    6 years ago

I wonder how Trump plans on pinning the next oil spill on Obama.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.1  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4    6 years ago

Easy.

Just say, "It's Obama's fault." Fox News will repeat this "fact", and the Unthinking Faithful TM will believe...

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
5  lennylynx    6 years ago

"Donaltrawmp is getting rid of dem dere job killin' regalayshuns Ma, hooray for Donaltraaawwmp!"

Yes, allowing huge corporations to poison our environment is somehow a positive thing to the right wing dingbats.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  lennylynx @5    6 years ago
... somehow a positive thing to the right wing dingbats.

Simple.

More money for the already-rich. The right serves the already-rich.

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
5.1.1  lennylynx  replied to  Bob Nelson @5.1    6 years ago

The Republican politicians?  Sure, their motivation is obvious.  What's harder to understand is the millions of people who get sucked in to thinking government regulations that protect the people from corporate abuses are a bad thing FOR the people.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
5.1.2  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  lennylynx @5.1.1    6 years ago
What's harder to understand is the millions of people who get sucked in to thinking government regulations that protect the people from corporate abuses are a bad thing FOR the people.

The GOP tells the Unthinking Faithful TM that they will be protected from those people, in exchange for their surrendering everything. They joyously accept the offer.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
5.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  lennylynx @5.1.1    6 years ago

I think that leaded paint should be provided to them at a deep discount, to make their corner of America great again.

 
 
 
lennylynx
Sophomore Quiet
5.1.4  lennylynx  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.3    6 years ago

Lol, they don't mind drinking leaded water, spreading leaded paint on their walls should not even cause them an afterthought!

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
7  MrFrost    6 years ago

This is pretty funny stuff actually. It was bush that repealed the safety regs that led to the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the first place. Pretty clear that once again, the GOP could care less about the environment, but is "all in" when it comes to supporting big oil. 

BP oil spill: “Bush administration allowed safety precautions to be circumvented”

While US senators grill BP over the ongoing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, it has emerged that it was the US government itself - under George W. Bush - which allowed oil companies to leave out a safety device which would have prevented the explosion on 20 April. An American environmentalist tells us: "Our politicians are beholden to the oil companies".

Almost a month after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that killed 11 workers, operator British Petroleum (BP) has yet to find a way to stop oil escaping from the rig, which sunk to the sea floor two days after the incident. The US Coast Guard originally estimated that 1,000 barrels of crude oil were leaking per day, but that number was increased to 5,000 barrels per day on 28 April.

On 5 May the US government put in place a fishing ban in the area, and a day later, oil reached the shores of the Chandeleur islands, 100 kilometres off the Louisiana coast. BP has made several attempts to block the ruptured well; its latest plan comes into force on Thursday , when it will try to seal the rupture with a new, smaller "top hat" containment dome.

The company has sprayed over 1.5 million litres (400,000 gallons) of dispersant onto the slick in the hope of it breaking down the oil components. But environmentalists and fishermen say that the solvent will do further harm to sea life.

Meanwhile executives from BP, Transocean and Halliburton - the three companies involved with the rig - face US senators at congressional hearings in Washington, where it was revealed on Tuesday that BP knew that there was a problem with the faulty well after doing pressure tests just hours before the explosion.

“Most of our politicians take money from the oil companies and therefore are beholden to them”

There's enough oil in the sea to coat the coast from Florida to Texas. In terms of area of impact, this spill has far exceeded previous spills, including the Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989. There simply aren't enough booms in the world to stop this amount of oil.

They say that 5,000 barrels a day are seeping out, but they have no way of proving it. To put a fixed number on the amount of oil that's escaping is making it up. The people at BP, the Coast Guard and all those releasing information are wilfully participating in a campaign of misinformation.

As for the dispersant, I think it's a serious mistake. For one, the product [Corexit, which contains the solvent 2-butoxyethanol] is a danger to sea life. Secondly, although the dispersant might break up the oil, the components then sink to the bottom of the ocean. That's where sea life begins!

Traceable to George Bush and Dick Cheney?

This has happened because most of our politicians take money from the oil companies and therefore are beholden to the oil companies. The US is one the most technologically advanced countries in the world. But we do not secure our oil rigs with acoustic switches - an automatic shut-off device attached to the blowout preventer that stops oil escaping in the case of an explosion. Operators in places like the Persian Gulf and Norway have them [in Norway and Brazil they are a legal requirement], but not in the US.

That's because the Bush and Cheney administration allowed safety precautions to be circumvented. [The US discussed making acoustic switches a legal requirement several years ago, but it was decided by the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service, which is closely tied to the oil industry , that the devices, which cost 500,000 dollars (400,000 euros) each, were an unnecessary cost].

Potential catastrophe

This is not just an American disaster, it's an international disaster. If - or rather, when - the spill gets into the Gulf Stream, it will be transferred to the Atlantic. That means it's going to hit the Everglades National Park in Florida, Jamaica, the Bahama Islands, Cuba...

Another potential hazard is that if the light sheen on the edge of the slick is evaporated then the oil will be rained down on the south coast.

Even worse: a hurricane - and we are entering hurricane season here - would blow the oil ashore. The debris line from a serious hurricane like Katrina is 30-40 yards wide and 30 feet high. In the event that we coat that debris with crude oil and it catches fire, we would have a coastline of burning debris.

The quality and safety of life in the Gulf Coast was compromised for BP profit. And I believe that that quality of life, for both the people and sea life, will not return to normal in our lifetimes."

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
8  MrFrost    6 years ago

Trump is a fucking retard... 

BP oil spill: Disaster by numbers

The scale of the BP oil spill can be hard to take in. Now, five months on, these shocking figures reveal the extent of the devastation. Compiled by Alice-Azania Jarvis

11 platform workers were killed when the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded on 20 April. Their bodies have never been found, despite a three-day Coast Guard search operation. Seventeen others were injured.


36 The number of hours for which Deepwater Horizon burned before it sank on the morning of 22 April 2010.


4.9 million The total barrels of crude oil released before the leak was capped on 15 July. This makes Deepwater Horizon the biggest oil spill to have occurred in US-controlled waters, exceeding the Exxon Valdez spill of 1989, which released 750,000 barrels.

4 million The number of barrels of crude oil it would take, according Harry Roberts of Louisiana State University, to "wipe out marine life deep at sea near the leak and elsewhere in the Gulf" as well as "along hundreds of miles of coastline".


1,000 BP's initial prediction of the leak in barrels per day. The real figure was 53,000.


5,000 The depth below sea-level, in feet, at which Deepwater Horizon was drilling at the time of the explosion. It could operate in waters of up to 8,000ft in depth and drill as far down 30,000ft.


3,850 The square-mile spread of the leaked oil, which had landed along 125 miles of Louisiana's coast by 4 June. Three weeks later, oil began to wash up on Pensacola Beach in Florida and at the nearby Gulf Islands National Seashore nature reserve.

50-60 The percentage of the oil spill thought to have remained on the water. 35 per cent was thought able to evaporate.


3 The percentage of that oil that it was possible to skim off. The remainder had to be removed through the use of other methods, such as burning, chemical dispersion and direct extraction.


125 The weight, in tonnes, of the containment dome placed over the largest leak. Oil was then piped to a storage vessel on the surface. BP's initial containment strategy, this failed when leaking gas combined with cold water to create methane hydrate crystals, blocking the pipe way.


92,000 The number of clean-up suggestions received by BPs dedicated oil spill helpline between May and June. 320 were categorised as promising. In the meantime, some 170 US Coast Guard vessels, 7,500 employees, and 2,000 volunteers had been engaged in grassroots clean-up activity.

4,768 The number of dead animals collected as of 13 August: 4,080 of these were birds and 525 sea turtles.




8,332-plus The number of species living within the vicinity of the oil spill. This includes the endangered Kemp's Ridley turtle, as well as more than 1,200 fish, 200 birds, 1,400 molluscs, 1,500 crustaceans, and 29 marine mammals and three other sea turtle specimens.




$2.5 billion Initial estimated cost of the oil spill to the US fishing industry.


$1 billion The value of the seafood harvested in the Gulf in 2008.


$23billion The estimated cost, according to the US Travel Association, of the oil spill to the Gulf Coast tourist industry, which currently employs upwards of 400,000 people and generates $34bn revenue each year.


$25million The amount donated by BP to Florida in order to promote its coastline. $15m million more was allocated to Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi individually.


$100million The amount allocated by BP to compensate those put out of work as a result of the spill.


23.5 The percentage of United States' oil production comprised by offshore drilling.




143 The number of oil spill exposure-related health cases recorded by the Louisiana Department of Health between April and June. Cases included 108 working on the clean-up efforts; 35 were working on a voluntary basis. Symptoms included dizziness, vomiting, nausea, headaches, and chest pains.

58,000 The number of people employed by the oil industry in Louisiana alone. Oil accounts for about 17 per cent of all Louisiana jobs. Now that a six-month moratorium exists on drilling deep-water drilling, these people face unemployment.


10-40 The range in percentage decline in reported custom at BP petrol stations post-spill. Most aren't, in fact, owned by BP.


847,730 The number of people who have "liked" the Facebook page "Boycott BP".


468,157 The number of people who have "liked" the FaceBook page "RIP SpongeBob, who died in an oil spill cause of BP".


$105 billion The total value lost by BP between April and June. Investors saw the worth of their holdings fall to $27.02, representing a loss of almost 54 per cent. In July the company's loss in market value totalled $60bn, a 35 per cent decline since the explosion. BP posted second-quarter losses – the company's first for almost two decades – of $17bn.


$50 million The estimated cost of the PR offensive which was launched by BP at the end of May. The campaign saw Anne Kolton, a former spokesman for the former US vice presidentDick Cheney, hired as head of media relations in the United States and included a series of TV adverts featuring an apologetic Tony Hayward, then CEO of the company, promising to "make this right".


130 The number of lawsuits lodged against BP, Transocean, Cameron International Corporation, or Halliburton Energy Services within a month of Deepwater Horizon's sinking.


220 The number of lawsuits filed against BP alone within two months.


5 The number of New Orleans judges who have had to excuse themselves from hearing oil-spill cases because of conflicts of interest (such as share ownership).


$10 billion The figure at which BP's liability for non-clean-up costs should be capped, according to a group of campaigning Democrats. This would represent a massive increase from the current legal limit of $75m, which was introduced by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.

$20 billion The size of BP's "oil spill response fund", created following a meeting between BP executives and Barack Obama. Claims on the fund, which is being chaired by Ken Feinberg, began to be accepted on 23 August. Within a week, almost 19,000 were submitted. Around $38.5m in claims has been paid out so far.


193 The number of pages in BP's official investigation into events leading to the Deepwater Horizon fire and subsequent oil spill, as released on their website on last week. The company took some responsibility for the disaster, though it also pointed to the failings of the Transocean drilling company crew, who, they say, incorrectly interpreted a pressure test, and the cement contractors, Halliburton.


23 The number of countries who offered to aid the clean-up efforts. In total, 70 offers were received from across those 23. Eight were accepted, involving the assistance of 12 different countries.


$4 million The amount donated by private charities and companies (many of them oil companies) to tackle the impact of the spill.


$69 billion The bill sent to BP by the Obama administration for the clean up effort.




$10 million The estimated size of former BP CEO Tony Hayward's pension, which is to be paid out in £500,000 annual instalments. He resigned on 26 July with one-year's pay of £1m and was replaced by Bob Dudley, an American citizen.




21 The number of years since the Exxon Valdez spill off the coast of Alaska. Puddles of oil can still be found in Prince William Sound on the state's South Coast. It is not known how long the fallout of Deepwater Horizon will last.


28,400 The number of people, to date, who have been involved in the clean-up operation. More than 4,050 ships and dozens of aircraft continue to work on the project.


$8 billion The estimated total cost of the spill and subsequent clean-up operations to BP. The company plans to sell around $30bn-worth of assets in order to meet its obligations.

But trump wants to make it EASIER for a disaster like this to happen again because a Black guy made it HARDER for disasters like this to happen. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
8.1  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  MrFrost @8    6 years ago
But trump wants to make it EASIER for a disaster like this to happen again because a Black guy made it HARDER for disasters like this to happen.

This is a no-brainer twofer for Trump:
- He revokes the Black guy's heritage,
- He shovels tons of money to Big Oil!

What's not to love?

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
8.1.2  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  XDm9mm @8.1.1    6 years ago

Ummmm... Did you read the definition? Eye Roll

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
8.1.4  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  XDm9mm @8.1.3    6 years ago
Obama is still half black

O. M. G....

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
8.1.5  MrFrost  replied to  XDm9mm @8.1.3    6 years ago
1-Obama is still half black

Funny how this comes up when the right wants to try to escape the racism tag. Ben Carson is only 80% black. See how that works? 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
8.1.8  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  XDm9mm @8.1.6    6 years ago
... mulatto...

Now, there's a word we don't see very often nowadays.

Do you also use "quadroon" and "octoroon"?

 
 

Who is online



Outis


101 visitors