Activist publishes 11,000 WikiLeaks Twitter direct messages
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Activist publishes 11,000 WikiLeaks Twitter direct messages
The messages show that WikiLeaks wanted the GOP to defeat Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.
An activist has published 11,000 direct messages on Twitter between the WikiLeaks account and a group of its supporters.
The direct messages were published by Emma Best on her own website. Her Twitter account states that she is a journalist on the East Coast. Best has been critical of WikiLeaks and has advocated for government transparency.
Some of the direct messages were previously published, but this is the first time all of the direct messages have been posted.
The messages show that WikiLeaks wanted the GOP to defeat Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.
"We believe it would be much better for the GOP to win," the WikiLeaks account states to a supporter named "Emmy B" in one of the messages from 2015.
Another Twitter message from the WikiLeaks account describes Clinton as a "bright, well-connected, sadistic sociopath."
WikiLeaks had been accused of bias against Democrats during the presidential race because of its release of hacked documents from the Democratic National Committee.
Critics believe that the documents released by the group were consistently helpful to President Trump 's campaign.
Best said in an exchange with the website Motherboard that she released the messages because she wanted to show how WikiLeaks was working with other online entities to shape public discussions.
“The idea was that the attitudes and behavior of WL [Wikileaks] behind closed doors is relevant, especially their coordination of PR, propaganda and troll ops through assets that are public supporters but not publicly known to take cues from WL," Best told Motherboard in a Twitter direct message.
Micah Lee, a technologist and journalist at The Intercept, confirmed to Motherboard the veracity of the message repository that Best published, saying that the cryptographic hash on her file matched his.
Tags
Who is online
67 visitors
Wikileaks has lost all credibility. I remember it's beginnings and so many people thought it would be a force for good.
I think the cause was always to foment anarchy. Assange has an anarchist background.
Now some people believe Wikileaks is in league with Putin.
I bet they magically lost all credibility with the left the second they aired the DNC emails!
That's true given that Wikileaks used to claim that their mission was to expose the misdeeds and corruption of governments, not to attempt to rig elections in favor of one candidate or another or to conspire with one government to rig the elections of another. It also became clear that Assange hates Clinton just as much as Putin does, and that his agenda in 2016 wasn't to promote government transparency but to prevent Clinton's election.
Well, in the infamous words of one Harry Reid:
"It worked, didn't it?"
LMFAO!
So you believe Wikileaks had an effect on the election. Which means by extension that Russian hacking had an effect on the election. Thanks for finally acknowledging reality.
Yep, it's doubtful Trump could have won enough EC votes without enlisting the criminal aid of Putin and Assange, where the latter was acting as a laundry service for the former by receiving and republishing stolen data and concealing the source. In the words of our Fuhrer, "I love Wikileaks!"
I believe that WikiLeaks exposed some inner workings of the DNC.
If people don't like that, how else would you expect them to vote?
And if the inner workings of the DNC are shameful, instead of bitching about HOW it was exposed or WHO exposed it, tell your party to clean up its act!
BTW, WikiLeaks had no votes, so your little jab about the EC is kind of silly.
Was there anything exposed by WikiLeaks that wasn't true?
Where the heck do you live that you have a Fuhrer, and why the heck are you so interested in American politics?
I wonder who runs them now. Who is actually behind all of it.
Assange can't do it all on his own being locked in an embassy.
Funny it says in the article that they are going to kick him out soon and he will have to find another place to go.
Ecuador cut off his internet access in March. He's persona non grata in the embassy and they're now trying to evict him.
Trying to evict him?
Not very damn hard. All they have to do is notify British Police and throw him out on the street. Eviction complete.
That's not so easy to do after the previous president of Ecuador had granted him asylum. But since that time Ecuador has learned that Assange has seriously abused their generosity and hacked the embassy computers.
So they can throw him out any time they choose. What a previous administration did regarding asylum isn't necessarily binding on a new administration.
Nice link. It seems Ecuador is getting tired of him.
Unsustainable. They will cut him off.
Julian Assange Is A Russian Front -Man, Not A Freedom …
WikiLeaks is a functional subsidiary of Vladimir Putin’s intelligence services and Assange—hiding in a London embassy rather than face charges as a sexual predator—is on the end of a long but firm Russian string.
Undermine America? "I love Wikileaks!" -- Donald J. Trump