╌>

E.P.A. to Reconsider Obama-Era Curbs on Mercury Emissions by Power Plants

  

Category:  Environment/Climate

Via:  bob-nelson  •  6 years ago  •  5 comments

E.P.A. to Reconsider Obama-Era Curbs on Mercury Emissions by Power Plants

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The Trump administration is reviewing a major Obama-era clean air regulation on the emission of mercury — a pollutant linked with damage to the brain, to the nervous system and to fetal development — with the intent of proposing a replacement rule, a spokeswoman for the Environmental Protection Agency said Wednesday.

The E.P.A.’s review of the 2011 mercury rule comes amid a string of initiatives by the Trump administration to roll back or weaken many environmental regulations put forth by the Obama administration. After reviewing the rule, a process which typically takes 60 to 90 days, the E.P.A. will issue a proposed replacement rule, the agency spokeswoman, Molly Block, said in an email.

30CLIMERCURYjumbo1.jpg A coal-burning power station in Cheshire, Ohio. The mercury regulation under review chiefly affects pollution from coal-fired plants.
Maddie McGarvey for The New York Times

The mercury regulation under review chiefly affects pollution from coal-fired power plants. The move comes as President Trump has pressed forward on numerous fronts in an attempt to meet his campaign pledge to revive the nation’s coal industry, despite economic analyses showing that the decline in demand for coal is largely driven by market forces rather than regulations.

Last week, the E.P.A. proposed a new rule designed to replace the Clean Power Plan, another major Obama-era regulation governing coal-fired power plants. That rule would have restricted coal plants’ emission of a different pollutant: carbon dioxide, one of the chief causes of global warming.

At the time the Obama administration put forth the mercury regulations, which took more than 20 years to formulate, E.P.A. officials estimated they would save thousands of lives and return economic and health benefits many times their estimated $9.6 billion annual cost.

While owners of coal plants fought the rule in the courts, most have since complied with regulation. Because coal plant owners have already invested in the technology required to lower mercury pollution, some analysts say, it makes little sense to change the regulation now.

“This is reckless chaos for the sake of chaos,” said John Walke, an expert on the Clean Air Act with the Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group. “The power sector is fully complying and has appealed to E.P.A. publicly, with labor organizations, to leave the standards alone.”

If the agency rolls back the rules, he said, it raises the prospect that “coal plant owners will face legal challenges to prior utility-commission approvals of pollution-control costs incurred to meet those obligations.”

In 2015, in a victory for opponents of the mercury rule, the Supreme Court concluded that the E.P.A. did not appropriately consider the costs to industry when crafting the rule and directed the E.P.A. to recalculate those costs. The Obama administration then reissued the rule in 2016, and power plants have complied with it since then.

Jeffrey Holmstead, a lawyer who represents coal-burning electric utilities and who served in the E.P.A. under former President George W. Bush, said in an email he was “not surprised” that the agency was reviewing the Obama-era finding that it was “appropriate and necessary” to regulate power plants for mercury pollution considering that several Supreme Court justices “expressed skepticism about the argument that the Obama E.P.A. made to support its second finding, which the current E.P.A. is now reviewing.”

Mr. Holmstead said, however, that he did not expect the Trump administration to try to eliminate a rule on mercury pollution entirely. “It would serve no purpose because the power sector has already spent billions of dollars to bring all their plants into compliance.”


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    6 years ago

minamata.jpg

 
 
 
Old Hermit
Sophomore Silent
1.1  Old Hermit  replied to  Bob Nelson @1    6 years ago

Bob, well chosen, very powerful imagery!

.

Tomoko Uemura in Her Bath

Tomoko Uemura in Her Bath is a photograph taken by American photojournalist W. Eugene Smith in 1971. Many commentators regard Tomoko as Smith's greatest work.

The black-and-white photo depicts a mother cradling her severely deformed, naked daughter in a traditional Japanese bathroom.

The mother, Ryoko Uemura, agreed to deliberately pose the startlingly intimate photograph with Smith to illustrate the terrible effects of Minamata disease (a type of mercury poisoning) on the body and mind of her daughter Tomoko.

Upon publication the photo became world-famous, significantly raising the international profile of Minamata disease and the struggle of the victims for recognition and compensation.

At the wishes of Tomoko Uemura's family, the photograph was withdrawn from further publication in 1997, 20 years after Tomoko's death.

Alternate names given for the photograph include: Tomoko in the Bath, Tomoko and Mother in the Bath and Tomoko is Bathed by her Mother.
 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1.1.1  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Old Hermit @1.1    6 years ago

This photo has haunted me for decades.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Participates
2  epistte    6 years ago

Coal-fired plants are dead and the industry knows it. Trump is not going to save coal. He is only boosting profits and damaging our health/the environment.

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- FirstEnergy Solutions on Wednesday night announced it plans to close its last Ohio coal-fired power plant, the W.H. Sammis plant on the Ohio River in Stratton, and its last Pennsylvania coal plant, the Bruce Mansfield plant on the River in Shippingport.

The company blamed the regional wholesale markets overseen by grid manager PJM Interconnection. It set June 1, 2021, to close Bruce Mansfield and June 1, 2022 to close Sammis.

"Our decision to retire the fossil-fueled plants was every bit as difficult as the one we made five months ago to deactivate our nuclear assets [in 2020 and 2021]," said Donald Moul, President of FES Generation Companies and Chief Nuclear Officer, in a prepared statement.
 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.1  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  epistte @2    6 years ago

Trump gesticulates, for the greater pleasure of the Unthinking Faithful TM. His gesticulation signifies nothing.

His policies are pure GOP: more money for the already-rich.

 
 

Who is online



399 visitors