╌>

Stephen Moore is quite the Douchebag

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  thrawn-31  •  5 years ago  •  14 comments

Stephen Moore is quite the Douchebag
(A)sking if there was any area in life "where men can take vacation from women."

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


One of President Donald Trump's picks to serve on the Federal Reserve Board has written that women should be banned from refereeing, announcing or beer vending at men's college basketball games, asking if there was any area in life "where men can take vacation from women."


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Thrawn 31    5 years ago
(A)sking if there was any area in life "where men can take vacation from women."

I am 100% positive he has NEVER had that problem. I get the very strong feeling his life has been a perpetual "vacation."

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Thrawn 31 @1    5 years ago
In one of his 2002 columns, Moore suggested changes to March Madness tournament to get rid of "un-American" aspects of it. The first rule proposed by Moore was "no women."
"Here's the rule change I propose: No more women refs, no women announcers, no women beer venders, no women anything," he wrote in March 2002. "There is, of course, an exception to this rule. Women are permitted to participate, if and only if, they look like Bonnie Bernstein. The fact that Bonnie knows nothing about basketball is entirely irrelevant." He later wrote that Bernstein, a CBS sports journalist at the time, should wear halter tops.
Earlier the column, Moore expressed disgust at a woman refereeing an NCAA game.
"How outrageous is this? This year they allowed a woman ref a men's NCAA game. Liberals celebrate this breakthrough as a triumph for gender equity," Moore wrote. "The NCAA has been touting this as example of how progressive they are. I see it as an obscenity. Is there no area in life where men can take vacation from women? What's next? Women invited to bachelor parties? Women in combat? (Oh yeah, they've done that already.) Why can't women ref he women's games and men the men's games. I can't wait to see the first lady ref have a run in with Bobby Knight."
Moore wrote that this was part of the "bigger and more serious social problem in America" which was "the feminization of basketball generally." Moore added he didn't care about watching women's basketball and he was upset games were shown on ESPN.
"And while I'm venting on the subject, here's another travesty: in playground games and rec leagues these days, women now feel free to play with the men — uninvited in almost every case," added Moore. "There's no joy in dunking over a girl. Never mind that I can't dunk (except on the eight-foot baskets). If I could, I wouldn't celebrate dunking over someone named Tina."
Moore addressed complaints about his column the 13 days later, mocking claims of sexism.
"Several readers (all women) have called and e-mailed complaining about my last column as 'sexist' because I said that women shouldn't be permitted to ref the men's game," wrote Moore . "Their retort was: 'Well then why should men ref the women's games?' Look, for all I care the women can use chimpanzees to ref their games. I hate women's basketball."
In another column in 2003 , Moore again wrote there should be "no women announcers." And in 2001 , Moore wrote, "Another problem is that CBS now has women announcers and commentators. Is nothing sacred?"
Writing in another column in 2000, Moore said the real issue of inequality in sports was women making more than "collegiate level" men who Moore said "could beat them handily."
"The women tennis pros don't really want equal pay for equal work. They want equal pay for inferior work. There's a very practical reason why Pete Sampras, for example, makes a lot more money than Martina Hingis does," wrote Moore. "He's much, much better than she is. The day that Martina can return Pete's serve is the day she should get paid what he does. If there is an injustice in tennis, it's that women like Martina Hingis and Monica Seles make millions of dollars a year, even though there are hundreds of men at the collegiate level (assuming their schools haven't dropped the sport) who could beat them handily."
"Yet these men make nothing. Venus Williams is a multi-millionaire not in spite of the fact that she is a women, but precisely because she's a woman," continued Moore. "She receives much higher pay than an equally skilled man. Isn't that precisely the opposite of what is meant by pay equity?"
Typically Moore makes forecasts depending on which news channell he is appearing on and usually covers, complete collapse, stalled or tremendous success ,
so that the next time he appears he can he was a genious
 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
1.1.1  seeder  Thrawn 31  replied to  Split Personality @1.1    5 years ago

Dude is a total incel, sorry, bitch.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Guide
1.1.2  epistte  replied to  Thrawn 31 @1.1.1    5 years ago

He is the kind of guy who couldn't get laid in a women's prison, even if he had a stack of pardons.

He and Stephen Miller make my skin crawl.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
1.1.3  seeder  Thrawn 31  replied to  epistte @1.1.2    5 years ago

Stephen Miller makes Harvey Weinstein seem like a good guy. Seriously, the guy just screams rapist.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Guide
1.1.4  epistte  replied to  Thrawn 31 @1.1.3    5 years ago
Stephen Miller makes Harvey Weinstein seem like a good guy. 

I'm not sure I'd go that far. Weinstein abuses teens and Stephen Miller hates anyone who has more melanin in their skin than Wonder bread.  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  epistte @1.1.2    5 years ago

This schmuck could only get me wet if he stole my umbrella during a rain storm.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
1.1.6  seeder  Thrawn 31  replied to  epistte @1.1.4    5 years ago
I'm not sure I'd go that far.

Come on, you know Stephen Miller has murdered children and made skin suits out of them. Even Buffalo Bill is creeped out by him.

 
 
 
epistte
Junior Guide
1.1.7  epistte  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @1.1.5    5 years ago
This schmuck could only get me wet if he stole my umbrella during a rain storm.

I wouldn't let him get that close to me. He wouldn't like my umbrella because it is black. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.1.8  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  epistte @1.1.7    5 years ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2  Kavika     5 years ago

And his comment (s) on women are only the start. His divorce and failure to pay the settlement as per court orders is another area of concern. 

Supply side economics is his claim to fame.

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Guide
2.1  seeder  Thrawn 31  replied to  Kavika @2    5 years ago

In other words he is a dumbass from start to finish. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Kavika   replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.1    5 years ago
In other words he is a dumbass from start to finish. 

BINGO

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
2.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Thrawn 31 @2.1    5 years ago

Trump found another mini me with this asswipe.

 
 

Who is online




73 visitors