Feminist Author Says Parents With ‘Bad Genes’ Should Be Banned From Reproducing…

Via:  badfish-hd-h-u  •  4 months ago  •  8 comments

Feminist Author Says Parents With ‘Bad Genes’ Should Be Banned From Reproducing…

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The slow march of the collectivist thinker always leads society toward complete government control over every function of the individual — whether it be the economy or your sex life, the only way the world can work under a leftist reality is if self-autonomy becomes obsolete. We were reminded of this again today after a self-avowed “secular humanist, feminist, physician” tweeted that certain parents should be banned from having children. In other words, she supports eugenics much like early feminist hero Margaret Sanger.

“Men and women who have bad genes with genetic diseases like diabetes, hypertension, cancer, etc. should not produce children. They have no right to make others suffer,” Taslima Nasreen tweeted.

In what seems like a parody, she defended her position by claiming that she too suffers because of her parents’ genetic defects. “I love fish and meat and sweets. But I have to be a vegan in order to reduce the risk of early death,” Nasreen said.

Keep reading…


jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
Find text within the comments Find 
†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh    4 months ago

A whole new meaning to the term feminazi.....

1.1  Tessylo  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 months ago

Who says she's a leftist?  Or progressive?

So because one nut says this and someone claims she's a  leftist, all leftists are guilty of this nonsense?

1.2  Tessylo  replied to  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh @1    4 months ago

Now I guess you'll claim weasel zippers and townhall are progressive sites?

This idiotic piece also told nothing but lies about Margaret Sanger and rambled on about leftists and abortion and birth control. 

What a stinky mess this article is 

2  lib50    4 months ago

I'm a feminist and disagree with this woman.  Isn't that strange, not all women (even feminists) agree on everything.  Try it sometime.

3  Sunshine    4 months ago

Apparently she got the tyrant gene.

†hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh
3.1  seeder  †hε pε⊕pレε'š ƒïšh  replied to  Sunshine @3    4 months ago

Evidently Eugenics is progress for some progressives.

4  Tacos!    4 months ago

For starters, it's ignorant. You might have a diabetes gene or a cancer gene, but that doesn't mean you'll get those diseases.

It's also darkly cynical. Ok so you're going to have hypertension or cancer or whatever. You'd rather pay the price of not experiencing life just to avoid that? Seems extreme.

Finally, it's hypocritical. If her life is so bad, why doesn't she just off herself? I figure it's because she's full of shit.

5  Freefaller    4 months ago

Feminist Author Says Parents With ‘Bad Genes’ Should Be Banned From Reproducing

Meh nothing new there, have seen lots of people (including here on NT) say similar stuff.  No one ever listens to them.


Who is online

lady in black
pat wilson


50 visitors